Bone metastasis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A report of two cases

  • Authors:
    • Kayo Suzuki
    • Taketoshi Yasuda
    • Kaoru Nagao
    • Takeshi Hori
    • Kenta Watanabe
    • Masahiko Kanamori
    • Tomoatsu Kimura
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 17, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.2976
  • Pages: 1814-1818
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequently diagnosed mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract. GISTs usually arise from the stomach, followed by the small intestine, rectum and other locations in the GI tract. The most common metastatic sites are the liver and peritoneum, whereas GISTs rarely metastasize to the bone. Although a small number of previous studies have described bone metastases originating from GISTs, the true prevalence is yet to be elucidated. The present study describes two cases of bone metastasis in patients with GISTs and reviews the relevant literature. Case one was of a 78‑year‑old male who presented with bone metastasis to the femoral neck five years after the resection of a GIST. The metastasis was completely resected and the patient remains alive nine years after the initial diagnosis of the GIST. Case 2 was of a 41‑year‑old male who presented with bone metastases to the ribs following resection of GISTs seven and 17 years earlier. The metastases were completely resected and the patient remains alive 17 years after the initial diagnosis. In total, only 10 cases of GISTs with metastases to the bone have been reported in the English literature. The possibility of bone metastases originating from a GIST should be considered during clinical follow‑up, particularly in the presence of liver metastases. If feasible, bone metastases should be completely surgically excised.

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequently diagnosed mesenchymal tumor of the GI tract, accounting for 1–3% of all malignant GI tumors (1). They are defined pathologically as c-Kit-positive mesenchymal spindle cell or epithelioid neoplasms (1). GISTs usually arise from the stomach (60–70%), followed by the small intestine (20–30%), the rectum (5%) and the esophagus (<5%), with an estimated prevalence of 11–14 cases per 1,000,000 individuals (2,3). Only 70% of patients with GIST are symptomatic. While 20% are asymptomatic and the tumors are detected incidentally, the remainder of cases are detected during autopsy. The most common symptoms of GISTs are nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, bleeding from the GI tract and weight loss (4). The most common metastatic sites are the liver and peritoneum, whereas GISTs are rarely found to metastasize intracranially or to the lymph nodes, lungs or subcutaneous tissue, as described in a limited number of previous case studies (57). Although a small number of studies have described bone metastases originating from GISTs (6,814), the true prevalence remains unknown (15,16). At present, the standard therapy for GIST is surgical complete resection, which is is possible in ~85% of patients. However, GIST recurrences and metastases are identified in 50% of patients following complete resection. Thus, for the treatment of these advanced or unresectable GISTs, the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib or sunitinib, are used (4,17). The overall survival rates for patients with advanced or unresectable GISTs who are treated with imatinib is 55% (18). The present study describes two cases of bone metastasis in patients with GISTs and reviews the relevant literature. Written informed consent was obtained from both patients.

Case reports

Case one

A 78-year-old male had previously undergone surgical removal of a stomach GIST in 2004. The patient subsequently fell and fractured the left femoral neck in September 2009. Although osteosynthesis of the femoral neck was performed at a previous hospital, union of the femoral neck was not achieved and the patient reported a painful, swollen mass in the left buttock. Plain radiographs revealed non-union at the surgical site and a mass in the soft-tissue of the buttock. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip identified a giant mass spreading around the left buttock from the femoral neck (Fig. 1). A biopsy was performed at the previous hospital, and a diagnosis of synovial sarcoma was suggested. The patient was admitted to Toyama University Hospital (Toyama, Japan) in 2009, where wide resection of the tumor and reconstruction of the hip joint using a tumor prosthesis were performed (Fig. 2). Histopathological examination revealed a hypercellular spindle-cell neoplasm, with a severe mitotic index of 70 per 50 high-power fields (Fig. 3A). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for c-KIT and cluster of differentiation (CD)34, but negative for S-100 protein (Fig. 3B–D). Chemotherapy was administered, which consisted of treatment with imatinib (300 mg, daily) for four years. The patient remains alive at four years post-surgery and is able to walk unaided.

Case two

A 41-year-old male had previously undergone surgical removal of a GIST of the rectum at Nagoya University Hospital (Nagoya, Japan) in 1997. A local recurrence was identified and resected in 2004. Positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) revealed a metastatic bone lesion in the left fourth rib. The bony lesion was completely resected in April 2007 at Toyama University Hospital and the patient was treated with imatinib (400 mg, daily) for three years. A stable disease state was subsequently maintained with the administration of imatinib (400 mg, daily) for five years. However, metastatic renal and liver lesions were identified and completely resected at Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital (Fukui, Japan) in 2012. Following resection, the patient was administered imantinib (400 mg, daily). In 2013, PET-CT revealed the presence of metastasis in the right fifth rib (Fig. 4), which was subsequently completely resected at Toyama University Hospital in December 2013. Histopathological examination revealed oval-shaped spindle cells with fascicular proliferation. Immunohistochemical analysis identified that the tumor cells were positive for c-Kit and CD34. The patient remains alive 17 years after the initial diagnosis.

Discussion

GISTs are pleomorphic mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract, consisting of spindle cells, epithelioid cells, or a combination of these cells, expressing c-KIT protein and, in the majority of cases, CD34 (4,19). The gold standard of therapy for GISTs is surgical resection of the local disease. The aim of treatment is complete resection of the lesion whilst avoiding tumor rupture. Survival rates are determined by tumor size, and not the presence of negative microscopic surgical margins. Complete surgical resection is achieved in ~85% of patients, however, 50% go on to develop recurrence or metastasis following the surgery (17). The five-year survival rate for GIST patients is ~50%, while the median time to recurrence following resection of a primary high-risk GIST is two years (4). However, since the introduction of imatinib as a molecular-targeted therapy, marked improvements have been made in the rates of progression-free and overall survival. Despite this, GISTs have a high-risk of metastatic relapse.

The most common metastatic sites are the liver (65%) and peritoneal surface (50%) (17), while GISTs rarely metastasizes to the bone. In a series of studies concerning metastatic GISTs, the incidence of bone metastasis was ~3% (15,16,20). However, the specific characteristics of patients with bone metastasis have not yet been identified. In total, only 12 cases of GISTs with metastasis to the bone, including those in the present study, have been reported in the English literature (Table I) (6,814). In the 12 literature cases, the most common site of bone metastasis was the spine (6/12; 50%). Six cases that presented with metastases to the spine did not undergo resection of the lesions. This suggests that metastatic spinal lesions are typically unresectable due to the infiltration of surrounding nervous tissue. As a result, four of the six patients succumbed to the disease within 17–90 months (mean, 51.5 months). In total, 11 of the 12 cases (92%), excluding case 11 (case one of the present study), exhibited liver metastases at the time that the bone metastases were identified. Therefore, in the event that liver metastasis is identified during clinical follow-up, an examination for the presence of bone metastases should also be performed. The time between initial diagnosis and the development of bone metastasis varies. The location of the primary site also varies. In the present study, evidence of bone metastasis originating from a GIST was identified five and nine years after the diagnoses of primary stomach and rectal GISTs, respectively.

Table I

Clinical characteristics of patients with bone metastases from a gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Table I

Clinical characteristics of patients with bone metastases from a gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Case no. (ref.)Age, years/genderPrimary siteSite of metastasesPeriod of bone metastasesa, monthsSite of bone metastasesTherapy for bone metastasesOutcomea, months
1 (5)57/MRectumLiver, boneAt initial diagnosisSpineTKIDOD, 17
2 (7)58/MSmall intestineLiver, bone28Clavicle, spineTKI, radiationAWD, 47
3 (8)54/MRectumLiver24ScapulaTKI, resectionAWD, 120
4 (9)57/MSmall intestineLiver49HumerusTKI, resection, radiationDOD, 55
5 (10)62/MSmall intestineLiver, boneAt initial diagnosisSpine, pelvis, ribTKI, radiation, zoledronic acidDOD, 33
6 (10)82/FStomachLiver, boneAt initial diagnosisSpine, pelvisTKIAWD, 48
7 (10)54/FSmall intestineLiver84Spine, pelvis, ribTKI, zoledronic acidDOD, 96
8 (11)83/MRectumLiver, bone12FemurTKI, radiation, zoledronic acidAWD, NA
9 (12)53/MEsophagusLung, boneAt initial diagnosisHumerusTKIAWD, 2
10 (13)69/FStomachLiver, bone12SpineTKIDOD, 60
11 (Present study)78/MStomachBone48FemurTKI, resectionNED, 72
12 (Present study)41/MRectumLiver, bone, kidney108RibTKI, resectionNED, 204

a Period from initial diagnosis.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn2-ol-09-04-1814'] } M, male; F, female; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; AWD, alive with disease; DOD, died of disease; NED, no evidence of disease; NA, not available.

A diagnosis of bone metastases originating from a GIST is usually based upon clinical findings, bone fractures or pain. An early diagnosis of bone metastases is desirable in order to avoid a marked reduction in quality of life. PET-CT is useful for the early diagnosis of bone metastases that originate from GISTs. Upon PET-CT, metastatic bone lesions exhibit high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose avidity, similar to that of the liver and other metastatic sites (16). In the present study, PET-CT proved useful in achieving a diagnosis.

Imatinib has revolutionized the treatment of advanced GISTs (17), enabling the long-term survival of patients. However, the optimal treatment for bone metastases originating from GIST is yet to be elucidated. Of the 12 patients with GIST-induced bone metastases described to date, four were treated with imatinib alone, four received radiotherapy and four underwent surgical resection of the lesion (Table I). The choice of therapy alters according to a number of factors. In the event that multiple lesions develop despite the use of imatinib, another tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) may be administered. Treatment options for patients with progressive disease or widespread systemic disease and a good performance status include continuation of imatinib at the same dose, dose escalation to 800 mg/day in the absence of severe adverse drug reactions, or switching to sunitinib, a multi-targeted receptor TKI (4). In addition to TKIs, radiotherapy can be used in patients with bone metastases for palliative purposes (12). Bisphosphonates are also effective for the management of bone metastases (11). If the metastatic lesion is isolated and occurs in a resectable site, imatinib may prove useful. In cases where the tumor remains resectable, imatinib can be continued indefinitely until there is evidence of tumor progression following resection. In fact, long-term survival was achieved in the present study by resecting an isolated bone lesion.

In conclusion, although bone metastases originating from GISTs are rare, the likelihood of identifying metastases in unusual sites is increasing due to the prolonged survival of patients with the tumors and the introduction of imatinib therapy. The risk of bone metastases from GISTs should be considered during long-term follow-up, particularly in the presence of liver metastases. Furthermore, since side-effects from TKIs are common, bone metastases should be completely surgically excised if possible.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 24592227 (KAKENHI). The authors would like to thank Dr Ayumu Hosokawa, Third Department of Internal Medicine, Toyama University Hospital (Toyama, Toyama, Japan) for providing support during the clinical follow-up.

References

1 

Miettinen M, El-Rifai W, Sobin HL and Lasota J: Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Hum Pathol. 33:478–483. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al: Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Human Pathol. 33:459–465. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Joensuu H and Kindblom LG: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 75:62–71. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Rammohan A, Sathyanesan J, Rajendran K, et al: A gist of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A review. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 5:102–112. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Nannini M, Biasco G, Di Scioscio V, et al: Clinical, radiological and biological features of lung metastases in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (Case reports). Oncol Rep. 25:113–120. 2011.

6 

Barrière J, Thariat J, Vandenbos F, et al: Diplopia as the first symptom of an aggressive metastatic rectal stromal tumor. Onkologie. 32:345–347. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Hamada S, Itami A, Watanabe G, et al: Intracranial metastasis from an esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Inter Med. 49:781–785. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Feki J, Bouzguenda R, Ayedi L, et al: Bone metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a case of report. Case Rep Oncol Med. 5098452012.

9 

Selcukbiricik F, Tural D, Ozturk MA, et al: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum with scapular metastasis: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 6:1452012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Abuzakhm SM, Acre-Lara CE, Zhao W, et al: Unusual metastases of gastrointestinal stromal tumor and genotypic correlates: Case report and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2:45–49. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Di Scioscio V, Greco L, Pallotti MC, et al: Three cases of bone metastases in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Rare Tumors. 3:e172011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Tezcan Y and Koç M: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum with bone and liver metastasis: a case study. Med Oncol. 28(Suppl 1): S204–S206. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Ozan E, Oztekin O, Alacacioğlu A, et al: Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with pulmonary and bone metastases. Diagn Interv Radiol. 16:217–220. 2010.

14 

Kroep JR, Bovée JV, van der Molen AJ, et al: Extra-abdominal subcutaneous metastasis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: report of a case and a review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol. 36:565–569. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Burkill GJ, Badran M, Al-Muderis O, et al: Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor: distribution, imaging features and pattern of metastatic spread. Radiology. 226:527–532. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Jati A, Tatli S, Morgan JA, et al: Imaging features of bone metastases in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Diagn Interv Radiol. 18:391–396. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Stamatakos M, Douzinas E, Stefanaki C, et al: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. World J Surg Oncol. 7:612009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Blanke CD, Demetri GD, von Mehren M, et al: Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of standard- versus higher-dose imatinib mesylate for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing KIT. J Clin Oncol. 26:620–625. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Miettinen M and Lasota J: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors - definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Virchows Arch. 438:1–12. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Dematteo RP, JoLewis JJ, Leng D, Mudan SS, Woodruff JM and Brennan MF: Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg. 231:51–58. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2015
Volume 9 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Suzuki K, Yasuda T, Nagao K, Hori T, Watanabe K, Kanamori M and Kimura T: Bone metastasis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A report of two cases. Oncol Lett 9: 1814-1818, 2015.
APA
Suzuki, K., Yasuda, T., Nagao, K., Hori, T., Watanabe, K., Kanamori, M., & Kimura, T. (2015). Bone metastasis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A report of two cases. Oncology Letters, 9, 1814-1818. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.2976
MLA
Suzuki, K., Yasuda, T., Nagao, K., Hori, T., Watanabe, K., Kanamori, M., Kimura, T."Bone metastasis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A report of two cases". Oncology Letters 9.4 (2015): 1814-1818.
Chicago
Suzuki, K., Yasuda, T., Nagao, K., Hori, T., Watanabe, K., Kanamori, M., Kimura, T."Bone metastasis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A report of two cases". Oncology Letters 9, no. 4 (2015): 1814-1818. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.2976