B cells inhibit the antitumor immunity against an established murine fibrosarcoma

  • Authors:
    • Andrea Maglioco
    • Damián G. Machuca
    • María Noel Badano
    • Paula Nannini
    • Gabriela V. Camerano
    • Héctor Costa
    • Roberto Meiss
    • Raúl A. Ruggiero
    • Mirta Giordano
    • Graciela I. Dran
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 6, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.5810
  • Pages: 3225-3232
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Despite the classic role of B cells in favoring the immune response, an inhibitory action of B lymphocytes in tumor immunity has emerged in certain studies. In methylcolanthrene-induced murine fibrosarcoma (MCC), the loss of immunogenicity and the establishment of tolerance are paralleled by systemic immune suppression and the appearance of B+IL‑10+ cells in tumor‑draining lymph nodes. The present study aimed to assess the role of the B+IL‑10+ cell population in the immune evasion and tolerance induced by MCC through the depletion of B cells in mice at various times of tumor progression: Prior to or subsequent to tumor implantation. Tumor growth and immunological parameters were evaluated. B cell depletion prior to tumor inoculum enhanced tumor growth, initiating the onset of the tumor‑induced systemic immune response; however, an increase in the T regulatory cells (Tregs) at the tumor‑draining lymph node could account for tumor exacerbation. B cell depletion once the tumor was established resulted in decreased tumor growth and a delayed onset of tolerance. Additionally, B cell absence exacerbated T cell dependent‑tumor rejection, reduced Tregs and increased cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. In vitro analysis showed a direct effect of B cells upon T cell proliferation. In conclusion, B cell depletion exerts opposite effects when performed prior to or subsequent to tumor implantation. In this initially immunogenic tumor, B cell absence would delay the establishment of immunological tolerance probably by unmasking a pre‑existing antitumor response. The present findings elucidate the convenience of modulating B cells in the development of future and more effective immunotherapies against cancer.

Introduction

The role of the host immune system in the control of cancer progression has been assessed for several years; at present, it is vastly accepted that antitumor immunity occurs and that numerous tumors have developed mechanisms to escape immune control, leading to malignant progression (1). The mechanisms responsible for antitumor immunity failure in individuals with cancer include a wide diversity of soluble immunosuppressive factors, including transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), interleukin 10 (IL-10), reactive oxygen species (ROS), enzymes and inhibitory ligands such as Fas ligand (FasL) or TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, released by tumor cells or by other regulatory cells in the tumor microenvironment (2). The majority of immunotherapies against cancer aim to counteract the action of regulatory cells in order to achieve tumor remission or prevent recurrences; of these, T regulatory cells (Tregs) have been the major focus of efforts to therapeutically modulate their inhibitory activity (3,4).

B cells have been classically associated with antigen presentation, antibody secretion and T cell activation during immune responses (58). However, in autoimmune diseases, B cells were demonstrated to exert immune-regulatory roles suppressing cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ T cell responses, mainly through IL-10 secretion (9,10). Therefore, novel studies focusing on the role of B cells as negative modulators of the antitumor response are currently underway. Evidence that accounts for the role of B cells in tumor-induced immunosuppression includes the existence of human B cells with a regulatory phenotype in solid tumors (11), the B cell-mediated induction of Tregs expansion (1214) and the increase of tumor growth (12,1517).

Methylcolanthrene-induced murine fibrosarcoma (MCC) is a highly immunogenic tumor that elicits an early specific antitumor immune reaction, which is not strong enough to impede tumor growth (1821). The antitumor response declines at a certain tumor volume (~500 mm3) and disappears comprising a state of tolerance (1821). Immunological characteristics of MCC and its rapid growth in vivo make it a suitable model to study mechanisms underlying tumor immunity and tumor-induced immunosuppression. Using this model, previous studies have demonstrated that small tumor-bearing mice (TBM) are able to reject a secondary distant implant of the same tumor through a T cell mediated-reaction, phenomenon known as concomitant immunity (CI) (18). Later, in the tolerogenic stage, CI is no longer detected and a second tumor implant grows without being rejected (18). MCC growth was also found to induce a series of alterations in the cell composition of tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLN), including the progressive increase in B cells with the emergence of an IL-10-producing subpopulation (20,22). These results suggest that B cells may be implicated in the downregulation of the antitumor immunity and the establishment of tumor tolerance in the MCC model. The present study examines the role of B cells in the immunological control of the MCC tumor growth.

Materials and methods

Mice

A total of 255 BALB/c and AKR mice (age, 2–3 months), inbred at the animal facilities of The Institute of Experimental Medicine, National Scientific and Technical Research Council, National Academy of Science (Buenos Aires, Argentina) were used in the experiments. Mice were housed at 23°C and exposed to 12 h light/dark cycles, with free access to food and water and handled according to the policies of the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Tumor

The MCC was induced in male BALB/c mice by the subcutaneous implantation of a methylcholanthrene pellet and was maintained by syngeneic transplantation. MCC is an immunogenic murine tumor characterized by an initial immunogenic state (tumor volume, 100–400 mm3) followed by a tolerance state (tumor volume, >500 mm3). Tumor size and volume were assessed every 2 days according to the Attia and Weiss formula: Tumor volume = 0.4 × (a × b2), where a and b represent the larger and smaller diameters, respectively.

B-cell depletion

The B cell-depleting monoclonal mouse anti-CD20 antibody (clone, 18B12), kindly provided by Biogen Idec (Cambridge, MA, USA), or rat non B cell-depleting immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (catalog. no., 10700; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was injected intraperitoneally (10 mg/kg) 3 days prior to or 9 days post tumor inoculation (p.i.). Blood samples were collected on day 0, 12, 16 and 24 and CD19+ cell presence was analyzed using a FACS flow cytometer (BD Biosciences San Jose, CA, USA) and WinMDI 2.8 software (developed by Joe Trotter). Experiments were performed at various times following antibody administration.

CI assay

For CI experiments, TBM received a second tumor inoculation of 7×105 tumor cells in the contralateral flank. The inoculation was performed 12 days p.i. in the group with B cell-depletion prior to the tumor implant, or 18 days p.i. in the group with B cell-depletion following the tumor implant. Tumor rejection was evaluated when the control group (mice with the second tumor implant only) developed tumors. The physical appearance, movement and weight of the mice were evaluated daily and the tumors were assessed for evidence of ulceration and necrosis.

Cells and culture conditions

Inguinal and axillary TDLN from TBM, equivalent lymph nodes (LN) from non TBM and tumor tissues were aseptically excised and mechanically disaggregated in PBS. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were obtained after sedimentation with Ficoll-Triyoson (1.099 g/cm3), as previously described (23). For in vitro assays, single cell suspensions were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 atmosphere in complete medium (RPMI-1640; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Natocor, Córdoba, Argentina) L-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin/amphotericin B and 2-mercaptoethanol (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

CD19+ and CD3+ cell purification

For functional assays, CD19+ B cells or CD3+ T cells were isolated from LN or TILs cell suspension, respectively, via cell sorting (FACSAria II; BD Biosciences).

Flow cytometry

Cell suspensions (1×106) were incubated with appropriate concentrations of the following monoclonal antibodies (1:100; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA): Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD8α (clone, 53–6.7; catalog no., 553031); FITC monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD4 (clone, H129.19; catalog no., 553651); phycoerythrin (PE) monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD19 (clone, 1D3; catalog no., 553786); PE monoclonal rat anti-mouse interferon-γ (IFN-γ; catalog no., 562020); PE monoclonal rat anti-mouse IL-10 (catalog no., 561060); PE-Cy5.5 monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD45R/B220 (clone, RA3-6B2; catalog no., 552771); and PE-Cy5.5 monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD25 (clone, PC61; catalog no., 551071). Cells were analyzed using a FACS flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and WinMDI 2.8 software. Irrelevant isotype-matched antibodies were used as controls. The intracellular presence of forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) was detected with PE-rat anti-mouse Foxp3 (clone, FJK-16s; catalog no., 12-5773; eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and the Foxp3 staining buffer set (eBioscience, Inc.). Following the stimulation of LN cells (2×106 cells/ml) with ionomycin (1 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, USA) and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (50 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) during 6 h incubation with brefeldin A (eBioscience, Inc.), intracellular staining of IFN-γ was detected with the monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD8α and PE monoclonal rat anti-mouse interferon-γ antibodies using the Cytofix/Cytoperm and Perm/Wash buffers (BD Pharmingen), according to the manufacturer's protocol.

B cell inhibitory activity in vitro

Balb/c mouse LN cells (2×105) were incubated with 2×105 AKR spleen cells treated with mitomycin C (Sigma-Aldrich) for 96 h. The final 18 h-pulse was 1 µCurie/well of [3H]-thymidine (DuPont NEN Research Products, Boston, MA, USA) for a standard allogeneic proliferation. Balb/c mouse B cells (7.5×104) isolated by cell-sorting from TBM or non TBM LN were added in co-culture or through a Transwell chamber, in the presence or absence of IL-10 neutralizing antibody (5 µg/ml; BD Pharmingen) or granzyme B inhibitor (ZAAD CMK; 10 µM; Enzo Life Sciences, Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA), from the beginning of the incubation.

Cytotoxicity assay

In vitro cytotoxicity was evaluated through the JAM test (20,24) Briefly, tumor CD3+ T cells isolated by cell sorting were incubated with [3H]-thymidine-labeled MCC cells (2×104) for 8 h. Specific killing was calculated as: Specific killing (%) = 100 × (S-E)/S, where S is the spontaneous killing and E is the experimental killing. Normal [3H]-thymidine-labeled fibroblasts were used as controls.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 3.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Differences in tumor growth were evaluated by two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post-tests (Fig. 1). Differences obtained in flow cytometry phenotyping (Figs. 2, 3 and 4A), cytotoxicity (Fig. 4B) and B cell inhibitory activity through Transwell (Fig. 5A) experiments were all evaluated for significance using the Student's t-test. Differences in B cell inhibitory activity in the presence or absence of anti-IL-10 or ZAAD CMK (Fig. 5B and C) were evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's Multiple Comparison test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001).

Results

Systemic B cell depletion exerts opposite effects during tumor implantation or tumor growth

Previous studies have described that a progressive increase in IL-10-expressing B cells occurs at the TDLN, as a tumor grows and evolves from an immunogenic to a tolerogenic state (20,22). In order to analyze a possible role for B cells in the establishment of tolerance and consequent tumor progression, TBM were depleted of B cells using an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, 3 days prior to or 9 days p.i. (Fig. 1). In the TBM, a single administration of anti-CD20 induced a sustained depletion of peripheral blood B cells (Fig. 1A and C). Depletion prior to tumor implantation resulted in increased tumor growth, which became significant at ~day 15 p.i. (P<0.05; Fig. 1B). By contrast, depletion performed after tumor implantation induced tumor growth retardation (Fig. 1D). The inhibition of tumor growth began immediately after antibody inoculum and reached significance ~10 days later (P<0.05). These results may indicate that B cells are initially necessary for the occurrence of the antitumor reaction, and are also required for subsequent tumor progression.

Systemic B cell depletion prior to tumor inoculation does not modify the early antitumor response at the TDLN, but enhances Treg number

Lymph node draining the tumor site is the first place where the immune response against tumor development takes place. A previous study showed that the initial growth of MCC could induce the activation of TDLN dendritic and T cells (immunogenic phase) (20). As the tumor increased in size, the signs of immune activation at TDLN disappeared as the mice became tolerant (tolerogenic phase) (20). On the supposition that B cell depletion prior to tumor implantation could impair the proper onset of the antitumor immune response and thus enhance tumor growth, the TDLN from B cell-depleted TMB were analyzed at various times p.i.. Mice were injected with anti-CD20 or IgG antibodies 3 days prior to tumor inoculum, and the TDLN were excised at days 5 and 20 p.i. and analyzed for cell composition. On day 5, a similar number of total and activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs were observed in TDLN from the two groups (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, the groups were inoculated with a secondary tumor implant to evaluate the CI, which evaluates the capacity of T cells to reject a secondary implant (18). The two groups showed the same proportion of tumor rejection (75%), suggesting that B cell depletion did not prevent the early activation stage that occurs in the TDLN following tumor implant. TDLN from depleted and control mice were analyzed on day 20 p.i., when the tumor growth curves of the two groups were clearly separated. An increased number of activated CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and increased Tregs were observed in B cell-depleted mice (Fig. 2B).

Systemic B cell depletion once the tumor is established prevents the inhibition of an antitumor response, increases activated T cells and decreases Tregs in TDLN and tumor tissue

Mice were injected with anti-CD20 or IgG antibodies 9 days p.i. and TDLN were excised and analyzed 8 days later. While B cell depletion did not affect the absolute number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, an increase in the number and proportion of activated CD25+- and IFN-γ-expressing CD8+ T cells and a decrease in the number and proportion of Tregs was induced (Fig. 3A-F). The subpopulation with putative inhibitory function, B cells expressing IL-10, also decreased (28,733±6,294 vs. 11,533±2,463; n=3; P=0.0116). At tumor tissue level, B cell depletion induced decreased Treg number and increased CD25+CD4+ activated T cell proportion among CD4+ TILs (Fig. 4A). In addition, the functional evaluation of CD3+ T cells isolated from tumors of depleted mice exhibited an increased cytotoxic capacity against MCC cells in culture (Fig. 4B). When CI was evaluated in B cell-depleted mice bearing large tumors (>500 mm3), an increased rate of tumor rejection (80%) was observed in depleted mice, whereas no rejection was observed in the control IgG-treated group (Chi-square test; P=0.00026). This result reinforces the possibility that B cells may be interfering with T cell activity. Overall, the results suggest that the absence of B cells could prevent immune suppression, unveiling the antitumor response.

B cells impair T cell activity, partially through IL-10 secretion

A possible inhibitory role of B cells on T cell function was further analyzed in vitro. Allogeneic T cell proliferation was assayed in the presence of B cells isolated from control- or TBM-LN, either with or without allowing cellular contact (Transwell assay). The results indicated that, unlike normal B cells, TBM-derived B cells were able to inhibit lymphocyte proliferation, and that this inhibition did not depend upon cell contact (Fig. 5A). To analyze the possible molecules involved in the inhibition, the same experiment was performed in presence of an IL-10 blocking antibody or a granzyme B inhibitor (ZAAD-CMK). The B cell-mediated inhibition of T cell proliferation was observed to be partially prevented by the blockade of IL-10 (Fig. 5B), while the inhibition of granzyme B exerted no effect (Fig. 5C). Overall, these results indicate that B cells from TBM have a direct inhibitory effect upon T lymphocyte function that is, at least partially, mediated by IL-10.

Discussion

Tumor presence generally leads to the appearance of immunosuppressive cell populations that not only affect endogenous antitumor response but weaken the efficacy of immunotherapies (25,26). Although Tregs have been classically assessed as one of the main mediators of tumor-induced immunosuppression (3,4), recent papers described a subset of B cells able to negatively regulate cellular immune responses, mainly through the production of IL-10, in several pathologies including cancer (2730). The MCC is a highly immunogenic tumor that provokes a strong antitumor immune reaction at the early stages of development. At a certain volume (~400 mm3) all systemic humoral and cellular antitumor evidences disappear, and tumor immunogenicity decreases and disappears leading the immune system to a state of tolerance (20). In the MCC model, the immune status of the host is reflected at various levels. During the immunogenic phase, subsequent secondary distant implants of the same tumor are rejected in a T cell-dependent fashion through CI, whereas this capacity is lost in the tolerogenic phase (18). Also, at the TDLN level, the cellular composition of the MCC switches from an activated antitumor profile to a predominantly immunosuppressive environment with immature dendritic cells, Tregs and a marked increase in B cells and IL-10-secreting B cells (20), the latter suggesting B cell involvement in the loss of tumor immunity. The present study aimed to elucidate the role of B cells in the immune response against MCC and in tumor-induced tolerance, by means of systemic B cell depletion. To get a close insight in B cell-mediated temporal events, depletion was performed prior to tumor inoculum or subsequent to tumor establishment, when the immune status of the host had clearly changed (20). Notably, opposite effects on tumor growth were obtained. B cell depletion prior to tumor inoculum enhanced tumor growth, suggesting that B cells are initially necessary for the onset of the antitumor response. On the contrary, B cell depletion performed once the immune system had been affected by the growing tumor resulted in decreased tumor growth, suggesting that B cells are also involved in tumor-induced tolerance.

The supposition that B cell absence would impair the initial antitumor response was analyzed through the TDLN cell composition and the CI response. Contrarily to previous expectations, the immune response within TDLN was unchanged in B cell-depleted animals. At day 5 p.i., no differences in activated and regulatory T cells were observed compared with non depleted TBM. In addition, the two groups displayed comparable rates of CI. Later, on day 20 p.i., when the growth curves in the two groups had clearly separated, an increase in number activated CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, along with an increase in CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs were observed in the TDLN of B cell-depleted mice. Speculatively, in the absence of B cells, tumor-induced mechanisms to evade the immune system may involve a compensatory exacerbation of the Tregs population, which could explain the separation of the tumor growth curves at that time.

When depletion was performed following the implant of the tumor, TDLN from B cell-depleted animals exhibited an increased number and proportion of IFN-γ-expressing CD8+ T cells and a decreased number and proportion of Tregs compared with control animals. Also in the tumor tissue, depletion decreased the proportion of Tregs, increased activated CD4+ T cells and increased the cytotoxic capacity of CD3+ T cells. It is feasible that B cell elimination would prevent or delay the negative impact on the immune system and the induction of regulatory cells induced by the growing tumor. In addition, a remarkable 80% of T cell-mediated secondary tumor rejection (CI) was obtained in B cell-depleted mice, whereas no tumor rejection was evidenced in control mice. Overall, these findings suggested that the absence of B cells would extend the immunogenic period, probably by allowing proper T cell action.

A regulatory role for B cells in cancer immunity that favors tumor progression has previously been assessed in other tumor models. Qin et al (31) demonstrated that low immunogenicity exhibited by a weakly immunogenic breast tumor is associated with B cell presence, while Tadmor et al (12) demonstrated the inhibition of a murine breast tumor and decrease in Tregs in B cell deficient mice. In addition, Shah et al (16) determined that B cells may inhibit an antitumor T cell-mediated response by antigen nonspecific mechanisms, and Inoue et al (17) showed that robust antitumor cytotoxicity can be developed only in B cell-knockout mice. While these studies have been performed in B cell deficient mice, to the best of our knowledge, only few studies have analyzed a role of B cells in cancer in B cell-depleted animal models. DiLillo et al (8) demonstrated that B cell depletion induced tumor growth exacerbation when performed prior to melanoma implantation; no effect was evidenced when depletion was performed following tumor implantation. These results led the authors to postulate that B cells were required for the onset of T cell activation in the melanoma model, though a promoting action of B cells on tumor growth was not observed (8). In another system Kim et al (15) found that B cell depletion following the establishment of the tumor not only retarded tumor growth but augmented the immunotherapeutic efficacy of a vaccine approach. The results of the present study partially agree with these two studies (8,15). An exacerbation of tumor growth was induced by B cell depletion prior to tumor implant; however, no effects of B cell depletion were detected in two of the recognized markers (activated cells within TDLN and CI) of an immune antitumor reaction in MCC. By contrast, depletion following tumor implantation impaired tumor growth, increased activated T cells and decreased Tregs. The different time frames in which B cell depletion is performed, the extent of depletion and even the subsets of B cells in various situations may account for these differences.

Multiple regulatory pathways were recently described for B cells in other pathologies, and certain pathways, such as FasL (32) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (33), require cell-to-cell contact to be effective, while others, including TGFβ (34), granzyme B (11) and IL-10 (13,27,28,35,36), are mediated by soluble molecules secreted by B cells. Accordingly, a previous study reported that B cells expressing IL-10, granzyme B and FasL are present during MCC growth (22). The present study demonstrates that B cells from MCC bearing mice are able to inhibit T cell proliferation in a contact-independent manner, with IL-10 being partially involved in this inhibition. Our previous results, which indicated a lack of TGFβ secretion by TDLN cells (20) and the results of the present study which demonstrated no effect of Granzyme B in T cell proliferation inhibition enable the involvement of these mediators to be ruled out. Future studies are required in order to elucidate whether another nontraditional soluble molecule could be implicated in the inhibition of T cell proliferation induced by B cells.

In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that B cells from MCC bearing mice contribute to tumor-induced immunosuppression and tolerance, favoring tumor progression, by affecting T lymphocyte function, increasing Treg number at TDLN and preventing T cell activation and cytotoxicity at the tumor site. Thus, B cell absence creates an imbalance in tumor immunity, which delays the establishment of tolerance and extends the period during which the immune system is able to react against the tumor. The present authors postulate that modulating B cells in a determined time frame could improve immunotherapeutic approaches against cancer.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Cancer (grant no. 6, ministerial resolution 1006/2016, Argentina), the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (grant no. 11220120100628, Argentina), the National Agency of Scientific Promotion and Technology (grant no 2014-1590, Argentina) and the Alberto J Roemmers Foundation, Argentina. The authors are grateful to Dr Christiane Dosne Pasqualini (National Academy of Medicine, Buenos Aires, Argentina) for a critical discussion of this article.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

MCC

methylcolanthrene-induced murine fibrosarcoma

Tregs

T regulatory cells

CI

concomitant immunity

LN

lymph node

TDLN

tumor-draining lymph node

TBM

tumor bearing mice

p.i

post tumor inoculation

References

1 

Cavallo F, De Giovanni C, Nanni P, Forni G and Lollini PL: 201: The immune hallmarks of cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 60:319–326. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Rabinovich GA, Gabrilovich D and Sotomayor EM: Immunosuppressive strategies that are mediated by tumor cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 25:267–296. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Petrausch U, Poehlein CH, Jensen SM, Twitty C, Thompson JA, Assmann I, Puri S, LaCelle MG, Moudgil T, Maston L, et al: Cancer immunotherapy: The role regulatory T cells play and what can be done to overcome their inhibitory effects. Curr Mol Med. 9:673–682. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Rech AJ, Mick R, Martin S, Recio A, Aqui NA, Powell DJ Jr, Colligon TA, Trosko JA, Leinbach LI, Pletcher CH, et al: CD25 blockade depletes and selectively reprograms regulatory T cells in concert with immunotherapy in cancer patients. Sci Transl Med. 4:134ra622012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

LeBien TW and Tedder TF: B lymphocytes: How they develop and function. Blood. 112:1570–1580. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Crawford A, Macleod M, Schumacher T, Corlett L and Gray D: Primary T cell expansion and differentiation in vivo requires antigen presentation by B cells. J Immunol. 176:349–3506. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Coughlin CM, Vance BA, Grupp SA and Vonderheide RH: RNA-transfected CD40-activated B cells induce functional T-cell responses against viral and tumor antigen targets: Implications for pediatric immunotherapy. Blood. 103:2046–2054. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

DiLillo DJ, Yanaba K and Tedder TF: B cells are required for optimal CD4+ and CD8+ T cell tumor immunity: Therapeutic B cell depletion enhances B16 melanoma growth in mice. J Immunol. 184:4006–4016. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Fillatreau S, Gray D and Anderton SM: Not always the bad guys: B cells as regulators of autoimmune pathology. Nat Rev Immunol. 8:391–397. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Bouaziz JD, Yanaba K and Tedder TF: Regulatory B cells as inhibitors of immune responses and inflammation. Immunol Rev. 224:201–214. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Lindner S, Dahlke K, Sontheimer K, Hagn M, Kaltenmeier C, Barth TF, Beyer T, Reister F, Fabricius D, Lotfi R, et al: Interleukin 21-induced granzyme B-expressing B cells infiltrate tumors and regulate T cells. Cancer Res. 73:2468–2479. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Tadmor T, Zhang Y, Cho HM, Podack ER and Rosenblatt JD: The absence of B lymphocytes reduces the number and function of T-regulatory cells and enhances the antitumor response in a murine tumor model. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 60:609–619. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Olkhanud PB, Damdinsuren B, Bodogai M, Gress RE, Sen R, Wejksza K, Malchinkhuu E, Wersto RP and Biragyn A: Tumor-evoked regulatory B cells promote breast cancer metastasis by converting resting CD4+ T cells to T-regulatory cells. Cancer Res. 71:3505–3515. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Zhang Y, Eliav Y, Shin SU, Schreiber TH, Podack ER, Tadmor T and Rosenblatt JD: B lymphocyte inhibition of antitumor response depends on expansion of Treg but is independent of B-cell IL-10 secretion. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 62:87–99. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Kim S, Fridlender ZG, Dunn R, Kehry MR, Kapoor V, Blouin A, Kaiser LR and Albelda SM: B-cell depletion using an anti-CD20 antibody augments antitumor immune responses and immunotherapy in nonhematopoetic murine tumor models. J Immunother. 31:446–457. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Shah S, Divekar AA, Hilchey SP, Cho HM, Newman CL, Shin SU, Nechustan H, Challita-Eid PM, Segal BM, Yi KH, et al: Increased rejection of primary tumors in mice lacking B cells: inhibition of antitumor CTL and TH1 cytokine responses by B cells. Int J Cancer. 117:574–586. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Inoue S, Leitner WW, Golding B and Scott D: Inhibitory effects of B cells on antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 66:7741–7747. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Franco M, Bustuoabad OD, Di Gianni PD, Goldman A, Pasqualini CD and Ruggiero R: A serum- mediated mechanism for concomitant resistance shared by immunogenic and non-immunogenic murine tumors. Br J Cancer. 74:178–186. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Bustuoabad OD, Ruggiero RA, Di Gianni PD, Lombardi G, Beli C, Camerano GV, Dran GI, Schere-Levy C, Costa H, Isturiz MA, et al: Tumor transition zone: A new putative morphological and functional hallmark of tumor aggressiveness. Oncol Res. 15:169–182. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Maglioco A, Machuca D, Mundiñano J, Cabrera G, Camicia G, Bruzzo J, Camerano G, Costa H, Ruggiero RA and Dran GI: Lymphadenectomy exacerbates tumor growth while lymphadenectomy plus the adoptive transfer of autologous cytotoxic cells and low-dose cyclophosphamide induces regression of an established murine fibrosarcoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 60:389–399. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Chiarella P, Vulcano M, Bruzzo J, Vermeulen M, Vanzulli S, Maglioco A, Camerano GV, Palacios V, Fernández G, Brando RF, et al: Anti-inflammatory pretreatment enables an efficient dendritic cell-based immunotherapy against established tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 57:701–718. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Maglioco A, Machuca D, Camerano G, Costa H, Ruggiero R and Dran GI: Regulatory B cells presence in lymph nodes draining a murine tumor. Medicina (B Aires). 74:185–188. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Rosenberg SA, Spiess P and Lafreniere R: A new approach to the adoptive immunotherapy of cancer with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Science. 233:1318–1321. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Matzinger P: The JAM test. A simple assay for DNA fragmentation and cell death. J Immunol Methods. 145:185–192. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Zou W: Regulatory T cells, tumour immunity and imunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 6:295–307. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Whiteside T: Inhibiting the inhibitors: Evaluating agents targeting cancer immunosuppression. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 10:1019–1035. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Mauri C, Gray D, Mushtaq N and Londei M: Prevention of arthritis by interleukin 10-producing B cells. J Exp Med. 197:489–501. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Watanabe R, Ishiura N, Nakashima H, Kuwano Y, Okochi H, Tamaki K, Sato S, Tedder TF and Fujimoto M: Regulatory B cells (B10 cells) have a suppressive role in murine lupus: CD19 and B10 cell deficiency exacerbates systemic autoimmunity. J Immunol. 184:4801–4809. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Matsushita T, Yanaba K, Bouaziz JD, Fujimoto M and Tedder TF: Regulatory B cells inhibit EAE initiation in mice while other B cells promote disease progression. J Clin Invest. 118:3420–3430. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

30 

DiLillo DJ, Matsushita T and Tedder TF: B10 cells and regulatory B cells balance immune responses during inflammation, autoimmunity and cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1183:38–57. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Qin Z, Richter G, Schüler T, Ibe S, Cao X and Blankenstein T: B cells inhibit induction of T cell-dependent tumor immunity. Nat Med. 4:627–630. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Lundy S: Killer B lymphocytes: The evidence and the potential. Inflamm Res. 58:345–357. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Zhong X, Tumang JR, Gao W, Bai C and Rothstein TL: PD-L2 expression extends beyond dendritic cells/macrophages to B1 cells enriched for V(H)11/V(H)12 and phosphatidylcholine binding. Eur J Immunol. 37:2405–2410. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Parekh VV, Prasad DV, Banerjee PP, Joshi BN, Kumar A and Mishra GC: B cells activated by lipopolysaccharide, but not by anti-Ig and anti-CD40 antibody, induce anergy in CD8+ T cells: Role of TGF-beta 1. J Immunol. 170:5897–5911. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Moore KW, De Waal Malefyt R, Coffman RL and O'Garra A: Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. 19:683–765. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Zheng SG, Wang JH, Gray JD, Soucier H and Horwitz DA: Natural and induced CD4+CD25+ cells educate CD4+CD25- cells to develop suppressive activity: The role of IL-2, TGF-beta, and IL-10. J Immunol. 172:5213–5221. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2017
Volume 13 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Maglioco A, Machuca DG, Badano MN, Nannini P, Camerano GV, Costa H, Meiss R, Ruggiero RA, Giordano M, Dran GI, Dran GI, et al: B cells inhibit the antitumor immunity against an established murine fibrosarcoma. Oncol Lett 13: 3225-3232, 2017.
APA
Maglioco, A., Machuca, D.G., Badano, M.N., Nannini, P., Camerano, G.V., Costa, H. ... Dran, G.I. (2017). B cells inhibit the antitumor immunity against an established murine fibrosarcoma. Oncology Letters, 13, 3225-3232. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.5810
MLA
Maglioco, A., Machuca, D. G., Badano, M. N., Nannini, P., Camerano, G. V., Costa, H., Meiss, R., Ruggiero, R. A., Giordano, M., Dran, G. I."B cells inhibit the antitumor immunity against an established murine fibrosarcoma". Oncology Letters 13.5 (2017): 3225-3232.
Chicago
Maglioco, A., Machuca, D. G., Badano, M. N., Nannini, P., Camerano, G. V., Costa, H., Meiss, R., Ruggiero, R. A., Giordano, M., Dran, G. I."B cells inhibit the antitumor immunity against an established murine fibrosarcoma". Oncology Letters 13, no. 5 (2017): 3225-3232. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.5810