Retrospective observational cohort study on cosmetic outcome of using Ti‑Ni memory alloy wire for intradermal suture following mastectomy in patients with breast cancer
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 13, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7603
- Pages: 2465-2470
Abstract
Introduction
In 1882, Halsted pioneered the radical resection of the breast. Breast surgery methods have changed since and clinicians commonly perform breast-conserving surgery. However, the optimal approach for radical resection remains controversial (1). Along with social progress and improvements in the quality of life, patients with cancer, particularly patients with breast cancer have increasing requirements for the function and cosmetic outcome following surgery (2,3). A previous study identified that 61% of patients reported that the opinions of their partners of the scars were important to them (4). The way an incision is closed and managed post-operatively affects cosmetic outcome (5). Historically, in breast cancer surgery, simultaneously ensuring treatment effect, shrinking excision scope and attending to the cosmetic effect has been important (6). To improve the aesthetic results for female patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, surgical techniques have been developed to render scars less noticeable (7,8).
In China, the majority of patients with breast cancer are treated with modified radical surgery using discontinuous silk suture, which leaves a very noticeable scar (9). A study on cosmetic surgery identified that 50% of patients reported that the extent of the visual scar greatly affected their self-assessment of the outcome (10).
Previous studies have assessed how drugs can be used to decrease scarring but the results demonstrated that there remains no ‘gold standard’ for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scars (11,12). The authors of the present study evaluated the methods of closing wounds in modified radical surgery in April 2014 and proposed using intradermal suture with Ti-Ni memory alloy wire (13). After >2 years of practice and observation, the wounds of patients with scarring markedly improved following intradermal suture with Ti-Ni memory alloy wire.
The primary objective of the present study is to assess the impact of using a Ti-Ni memory alloy wire intradermal sutures on the cosmetic outcome of the wound scar within 25 weeks following mastectomy.
Materials and methods
Study design
Prior to the start of the present study, the methods of surgical suturing were altered and the postoperative effects were observed. After >2 years of observing and evaluating Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores and the number of wound healing day(s), the present study reviewed the retrospective data. The present study is a retrospective observational cohort study with parallel groups and compares conventional closure with closure using intradermal sutures and Ti-Ni memory alloy wire in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary surgery.
Setting
The present study included diagnostic surgery and post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer in the Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Shaanxi, China), a process that took ~6 months. The patients were treated with interrupted suture or intradermal suture.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Female patients with operable breast cancer (invasive carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in situ); ii) age, ≥18 and ≤85 years; iii) scheduled for mastectomy either alone or in association with axillary clearance; iv) either sentinel lymph node biopsy or standard level I/II axillary node dissection (14); v) written hospital-approved informed consent by the patient; and vi) surgical wound classified class I (Surgical Wound Classification) (15). Patients were excluded if any of the following criteria were met: i) Undergoing surgery for modified radical mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction, cosmetic breast operations, reduction, expansion, insertion of a prosthesis, duct ectasia, infective breast disease or implant; ii) surgical wounds identified as class II, III or IV using Centers for Disease Control surgical site infection Surgical Wound Classification (15); iii) inflammatory breast cancer or skin ulceration; iv) presence of physical or psychiatric conditions that could impair outcome assessment and intended follow-up (5); v) personal or family skin scar history; vi) received an experimental drug or used an experimental medical device within 30 days prior to the planned start of treatment; vii) employees of the assessor associated with the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that assessor; and viii) unlikely to comply with chemotherapy or complete the 25-week follow-up visit.
Patients
The first patient received intradermal sutures using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire in April 2014. In total, 98 female patients aged between 24 and 74 years, categorized into the active (n=50) and control (n=48) groups, were enrolled between April 2014 and April 2016. A total of 10 patients suffered from diabetes in the active group and 9 patients suffered from diabetes in the control group. The patients of control group were treated with traditional methods of wound closure. The present study reviewed all patient data for those admitted to the Second Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Shaanxi, China) who met the inclusion criteria. The present study focused on scarring. Baseline data were collected following enrollment during the therapy period. The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Ethics Committee approved the present study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Study interventions
Experienced breast surgeons using a standardized technique performed mastectomies (16). The skin incision included the tumor biopsy site, any invaded or edematous skin and the nipple-areola complex (17). The present study addressed the type of wound closure in mastectomy. The patients were divided into two groups, and the two groups were distinguished by the use of two different types of wound closure. In the intradermal suture group, intradermal suture using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire was implemented. In the conventional closure group, the incision was closed using the interrupted transcutaneous pattern with Chinese silk (Fig. 1). These two sutures were removed when the wounds were adequately healed (i.e., re-establishment of normal tissue integrity).
All patients were provided with a drainage tube and suction bottle to prevent subcutaneous seroma following mastectomy. All patients received chemotherapy and the same follow-up plan, including chest-abdominal computed tomography and tumor markers, was implemented every 3 months (18,19). The scars were assessed 25 weeks following mastectomy. All scars were assessed independently by three observers (one oncologist and two breast cancer research associates) on the same day, using the VSS. The VSS observes four physical characteristics of scars: Vascularity, pigmentation, pliability and height (20,21). Each variable contains ranked subscales that may be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 13, with 0 representing normal skin (Table I) (20,21).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using computer software SPSS (version 16.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In the present study, the differences between the baseline characteristics of patients were compared using Fisher's exact test for the different categories and independent sample t-test for continuous variables. The endpoint means of the VSS scores were analyzed using independent sample t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Characteristics of enrolled patients
All patients completed the present study. The baseline characteristics of the patients were provided (Table II). The present study compared the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The groups were similar in terms of mean age (P>0.05), body mass index (P>0.05), operating time (P>0.05), blood loss (P>0.05), length of post-operative hospital stay (P>0.05), pathological stage (7th edition; American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control tumor-node-metastasis staging systems; P>0.05) and medical history (P>0.05) (22).
Cosmetic outcome
Results demonstrated that the mean VSS score of the active group was decreased (indicating improved cosmetic outcome) compared with that of the control group (P<0.001; Table III). The four features of the VSS scores differed statistically (P<0.001). The cosmetic results of suturing for four cases are also presented in Fig. 2. A comparison of cosmetic results between the experimental and control groups is shown in Fig. 3, and statistical differences between the active and control groups are shown.
Unexpected benefits of using memory alloy wire in patients with diabetes
Aside from improved recovery from the surgical wound, the present study also observed accelerated wound healing in both groups. The mean number of wound healing days required to take out stitches was decreased for the active group compared with that for the control group in patients with diabetes (P=0.0026; Fig. 4). Results indicated that using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire was able to decrease the days of wound healing required between patients with diabetes and their non-diabetic counterparts (P=0.7009; Fig. 4). Results of the present study suggested that using memory alloy facilitated wound healing.
Discussion
In the present study, the scar of patients in the active group was limited to a light spot in the majority of cases. The results of the present study indicated that patients whose incisions were closed using intradermal suture with Ti-Ni memory alloy wire suture exhibited an improved cosmetic outcome compared with those for whom incisions were closed using the interrupted suturing technique. The cosmetic outcome was assessed using VSS. VSS is a reliable, comprehensive approach for assessing linear surgical scars (23). VSS assesses four subjective variables (vascularity, pigmentation, pliability and height) within a range of 0–13 for the total score (calculated as the sum of all four subjective variables scores), where a lower score (0–4) indicates improved healing (21).
In China, certain surgeons use discontinuous silk suture to close the skin incision (9,24). Therefore, suture track scars are present on each side of the incision in numerous cases and one can observe a suture reaction, inflammation, liquefaction, infection or incision dehiscence requiring secondary suture (4). Scars are usually caused by excessive repair of skin wounds due to excessive proliferation, activation and migration of fibroblasts. Increase in the biosynthesis of fibroblasts cause excessive collagen deposition of extracellular matrix (25,26). Collagen fibers also form here as a result of the body synthesizing collagen at an increased rate compared with that at which it catabolizes collagen over a longer period of time (27,28).
The present study indicated that continuous intradermal suture was able to decrease scar formation compared with the control group, although patients exhibited scar hyperplasia. Despite this, intradermal suture may decrease the discomfort the hyperplastic scar causes, including prominent surface, thick texture, local pain, heat-induced itch. Intradermal suture may also improve the function of sleep quality (29–31). Typically, the time taken for wounds to heal in patients without diabetes is decreased compared with patients with diabetes (32–35). Consistent with these previous studies, it was indicated in the present study that the time taken for wounds to heal in patients with diabetes was increased compared with that of the patients without diabetes in the control group. However, the time taken for wounds to heal in patients with and without diabetes was similar in the active group. Furthermore, it was indicated that the time taken for wounds to heal in patients with diabetes differed significantly between the active and control groups, the healing time of active groups was shorter compared with that of control groups. The present study suggested that continuous intradermal suture of incision with Ti-Ni memory alloy wire may promote skin incisions to heal and decrease scar hyperplasia, and therefore this method may be recommended to other surgeons for patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary surgery.
The present study was a retrospective, observational cohort study and had a number of limitations. The present study was not double blind, which may have generated bias. The 2-year follow-up period was short, and the prognosis of disease was not assessed. VSS reflects the different physical characteristics carried out by the observer, reflecting different physiological aspects of wound healing and scar maturation. The present study identified that VSS scores objectively reflected scar maturation. However, the VSS does not include a self-assessment of the patient outcome.
To conclude, the intradermal suture technique offers an improved cosmetic outcome for patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary surgery. The present study suggested that intradermal suture using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire may represent an effective means of inhibiting scars from forming following mastectomy. For patients undergoing intradermal suture using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire, the scar was less noticeable and wound healing was improved compared with the control group, particularly in patients with diabetes.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (grant nos. 81402506 and 81602597).
References
Akram M and Siddiqui SA: Breast cancer management: Past, present and evolving. Indian J Cancer. 49:277–282. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sehl M, Lu X, Silliman R and Ganz PA: Decline in physical functioning in first 2 years after breast cancer diagnosis predicts 10-year survival in older women. J Cancer Surviv. 7:20–31. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Derks MG, de Glas NA, Bastiaannet E, de Craen AJ, Portielje JE, van de Velde CJ, van Leeuwen FE and Liefers GJ: Physical functioning in older patients with breast cancer: A prospective cohort study in the TEAM trial. Oncologist. 7:946–953. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Joyce CW, Murphy S, Murphy S, Kelly JL and Morrison CM: Scar wars: Preferences in breast surgery. Arch Plast Surg. 42:596–600. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang ZT, Zhang HW, Fang XD, Wang LM, Li XX, Li YF, Sun XW, Carver J, Simpkins D, Shen J and Weisberg M: Cosmetic outcome and surgical site infection rates of antibacterial absorbable (Polyglactin 910) suture compared to Chinese silk suture in breast cancer surgery: A randomized pilot research. Chin Med J (Engl). 124:719–724. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ünsal MG, Dural AC, Çelik MF, Akarsu C, Başoğlu İ, Dilege ME, Kapan S and Alış H: The adaptation process of a teaching and research hospital to changing trends in modern breast surgery. Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 31:34–38. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Peyser PM, Abel JA, Straker VF, Hall VL and Rainsbury RM: Ultraconservative skin-sparing ‘keyhole’ mastectomy and immediate breast and areola reconstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 82:227–235. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Shrotria S: The periareolar incision - gateway to the breast! Eur J Surg Oncol. 27:601–603. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang J, Zhang YF, Wang X, Wang J, Yang X, Gao YQ and Fang Y: Treatment outcomes of occult breast carcinoma and prognostic analyses. Chin Med J (Engl). 126:3026–3029. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoeller U, Kuhlmey A, Bajrovic A, Grader K, Berger J, Tribius S, Fehlauer F and Alberti W: Cosmesis from the patient's and the doctor's view. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 57:3452003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
O'Kane S: Wound remodeling and scarring. J Wound Care. 11:296–299. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Truong PT, Lee JC, Soer B, Gaul CA and Olivotto IA: Reliability and validity testing of the patient and observer scar assessment scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 119:487–494. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Neelakantan L, Zglinski JK, Frotscher M and Eggeler G: Design and fabrication of a bending rotation fatigue test rig for in situ electrochemical analysis during fatigue testing of NiTi shape memory alloy wires. Rev Sci Instrum. 84:0351022013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kinoshita T, Takasugi M, Iwamoto E, Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T and Terui S: Sentinel lymph node biopsy examination for breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg. 191:225–229. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yamamoto T, Takahashi S, Ichihara K, Hiyama Y, Uehara T, Hashimoto J, Hirobe M and Masumori N: How do we understand the disagreement in the frequency of surgical site infection between the CDC and Clavien-Dindo classifications? J Infect Chemother. 21:130–133. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li YJ, Huang XE and Zhou XD: Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery for Paget's disease: A meta-analysis. Breast Care (Basel). 9:431–434. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ouldamer L, Bonastre J, Brunet-Houdard S, Body G, Giraudeau B and Caille A: Dead space closure with quilting suture versus conventional closure with drainage for the prevention of seroma after mastectomy for breast cancer (QUISERMAS): Protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open. 6:e0099032016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
MacFater H, MacFater W, Hill A and Lill M: Individualised follow-up booklets improve recall and satisfaction for cancer patients. N Z Med J. 130:39–45. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Allinson VM and Dent J: Supportive care after breast cancer surgery. Nurs Times. 110:20–23. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Pauline T, Truong F, Yong CM, Hayashi A, Runkel JA, Phillips T and Olivotto IA: Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the vancouver scar scale, short-form mcgill pain questionnaire and patients' perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg. 116:1291–1299. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nedelec B, Shankowsky HA and Tredget EE: Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: Comparison of the vancouver scar scale and scar volume. J Burn Care Rehabil. 21:205–212. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ursaru M, Jari I, Popescu R, Negru D, Naum A and Scripcariu V: Multifactorial analysis of local and lymph node recurrences after conservative or radical surgery for stage 0–II breast cancer. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 118:1062–1067. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kaartinen IS, Välisuo PO, Bochko V, Alander JT and Kuokkanen HO: How to assess scar hypertrophy - a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method. Wound Repair Regen. 19:316–323. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao WX, Wang B, Yan SY and Zhang LY: Strategy of points, lines and layers in needle assisted laparoscope functional modified neck dissection through bilateral breast approach. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 54:823–827. 2016.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI | |
Liebl H and Kloth LC: Skin cell proliferation stimulated by microneedles. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 4:2–6. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guo J, Lin Q, Shao Y, Rong L and Zhang D: miR-29b promotes skin wound healing and reduces excessive scar formation by inhibition of the TGF-β1/Smad/CTGF signaling pathway. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 95:437–442. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li J, Chen L, Cao C, Yan H, Zhou B, Gao Y, Li Q and Li J: The long non-coding RNA LncRNA8975-1 is upregulated in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts and controls collagen expression. Cell Physiol Biochem. 40:326–334. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li H, Yang L, Zhang Y and Gao Z: Kaempferol inhibits fibroblast collagen synthesis, proliferation and activation in hypertrophic scar via targeting TGF-β receptor type I. Biomed Pharmacother. 83:967–974. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kotaluoto S, Pauniaho SL, Helminen M, Kuokkanen H and Rantanen T: Wound healing after open appendectomies in adult patients: A prospective, randomised trial comparing two methods of wound closure. World J Surg. 36:2305–2310. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Koskela A, Kotaluoto S, Kaartinen I, Pauniaho SL, Rantanen T and Kuokkanen H: Continuous absorbable intradermal sutures yield better cosmetic results than nonabsorbable interrupted sutures in open appendectomy wounds: A prospective, randomized trial. World J Surg. 38:1044–1050. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Paolini S, Morace R, Lanzino G, Missori P, Nano G, Cantore G and Esposito V: Absorbable intradermal closure of elective craniotomy wounds. Neurosurgery. 62 Suppl 2:ONS490–ONS492. 2008.PubMed/NCBI | |
Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J and Mirastschijski U: Skin wound healing: An update on the current knowledge and concepts. Eur Surg Res. 58:81–94. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nouvong A, Ambrus AM, Zhang ER, Hultman L and Coller HA: Reactive oxygen species and bacterial biofilms in diabetic wound healing. Physiol Genomics. 48:889–896. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reed GW, Salehi N, Giglou PR, Kafa R, Malik U, Maier M and Shishehbor MH: Time to wound healing and major adverse limb events in patients with critical limb ischemia treated with endovascular revascularization. Ann Vasc Surg. 36:190–198. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Khamaisi M, Katagiri S, Keenan H, Park K, Maeda Y, Li Q, Qi W, Thomou T, Eschuk D, Tellechea A, et al: PKCδ inhibition normalizes the wound-healing capacity of diabetic human fibroblasts. J Clin Invest. 126:837–853. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |