Retrospective observational cohort study on cosmetic outcome of using Ti‑Ni memory alloy wire for intradermal suture following mastectomy in patients with breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Gang Li
    • Sida Qin
    • Xin Sun
    • Jiansheng Wang
    • Yunfeng Zhang
    • Jia Zhang
    • Jing Zhang
    • Shou‑Ching Tang
    • Hong Ren
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 13, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7603
  • Pages: 2465-2470
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The method of suturing for incisions is crucial for the comprehensive treatment of clinical patients with breast cancer. Suturing is considered a major part of post‑surgical recovery and may serve as a marker for evaluation of surgical outcome. The present study aimed to establish an effective means of suturing for patients who received modified radical surgery that helps to improve the cosmetic outcome of the incision. Enrolled patients were divided into an active and a control group. Ti‑Ni memory alloy wire for intradermal suture in the active group and silk for interruption suture in the control group were applied to assess the different prognosis‑associated factors. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used to evaluate the wound size and the recovery time of the scars. The association between diabetes and the number of days of wound healing was also analyzed. The results indicated that the mean VSS score of the active group was decreased compared with that of the control group (P<0.001). The VSS scores of four main features (vascularity, pigmentation, pliability and height) between the two groups also statistically differed (P<0.001). Furthermore, the mean number of days of wound healing was significantly decreased for the active group compared with that for the control group (P=0.0026) in the patients with diabetes. In addition, the usage of Ti‑Ni memory alloy wire was able to decrease the mean number of wound healing days between patients with diabetes and their non‑diabetic counterparts (P=0.7009). The present study indicated that intradermal suture offers improved cosmetic outcome for patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary surgery. This technique may be useful for preventing scar overgrowth and for facilitating the recovery process in patients with diabetes.

Introduction

In 1882, Halsted pioneered the radical resection of the breast. Breast surgery methods have changed since and clinicians commonly perform breast-conserving surgery. However, the optimal approach for radical resection remains controversial (1). Along with social progress and improvements in the quality of life, patients with cancer, particularly patients with breast cancer have increasing requirements for the function and cosmetic outcome following surgery (2,3). A previous study identified that 61% of patients reported that the opinions of their partners of the scars were important to them (4). The way an incision is closed and managed post-operatively affects cosmetic outcome (5). Historically, in breast cancer surgery, simultaneously ensuring treatment effect, shrinking excision scope and attending to the cosmetic effect has been important (6). To improve the aesthetic results for female patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, surgical techniques have been developed to render scars less noticeable (7,8).

In China, the majority of patients with breast cancer are treated with modified radical surgery using discontinuous silk suture, which leaves a very noticeable scar (9). A study on cosmetic surgery identified that 50% of patients reported that the extent of the visual scar greatly affected their self-assessment of the outcome (10).

Previous studies have assessed how drugs can be used to decrease scarring but the results demonstrated that there remains no ‘gold standard’ for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scars (11,12). The authors of the present study evaluated the methods of closing wounds in modified radical surgery in April 2014 and proposed using intradermal suture with Ti-Ni memory alloy wire (13). After >2 years of practice and observation, the wounds of patients with scarring markedly improved following intradermal suture with Ti-Ni memory alloy wire.

The primary objective of the present study is to assess the impact of using a Ti-Ni memory alloy wire intradermal sutures on the cosmetic outcome of the wound scar within 25 weeks following mastectomy.

Materials and methods

Study design

Prior to the start of the present study, the methods of surgical suturing were altered and the postoperative effects were observed. After >2 years of observing and evaluating Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores and the number of wound healing day(s), the present study reviewed the retrospective data. The present study is a retrospective observational cohort study with parallel groups and compares conventional closure with closure using intradermal sutures and Ti-Ni memory alloy wire in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary surgery.

Setting

The present study included diagnostic surgery and post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer in the Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Shaanxi, China), a process that took ~6 months. The patients were treated with interrupted suture or intradermal suture.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Female patients with operable breast cancer (invasive carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in situ); ii) age, ≥18 and ≤85 years; iii) scheduled for mastectomy either alone or in association with axillary clearance; iv) either sentinel lymph node biopsy or standard level I/II axillary node dissection (14); v) written hospital-approved informed consent by the patient; and vi) surgical wound classified class I (Surgical Wound Classification) (15). Patients were excluded if any of the following criteria were met: i) Undergoing surgery for modified radical mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction, cosmetic breast operations, reduction, expansion, insertion of a prosthesis, duct ectasia, infective breast disease or implant; ii) surgical wounds identified as class II, III or IV using Centers for Disease Control surgical site infection Surgical Wound Classification (15); iii) inflammatory breast cancer or skin ulceration; iv) presence of physical or psychiatric conditions that could impair outcome assessment and intended follow-up (5); v) personal or family skin scar history; vi) received an experimental drug or used an experimental medical device within 30 days prior to the planned start of treatment; vii) employees of the assessor associated with the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that assessor; and viii) unlikely to comply with chemotherapy or complete the 25-week follow-up visit.

Patients

The first patient received intradermal sutures using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire in April 2014. In total, 98 female patients aged between 24 and 74 years, categorized into the active (n=50) and control (n=48) groups, were enrolled between April 2014 and April 2016. A total of 10 patients suffered from diabetes in the active group and 9 patients suffered from diabetes in the control group. The patients of control group were treated with traditional methods of wound closure. The present study reviewed all patient data for those admitted to the Second Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Shaanxi, China) who met the inclusion criteria. The present study focused on scarring. Baseline data were collected following enrollment during the therapy period. The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Ethics Committee approved the present study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Study interventions

Experienced breast surgeons using a standardized technique performed mastectomies (16). The skin incision included the tumor biopsy site, any invaded or edematous skin and the nipple-areola complex (17). The present study addressed the type of wound closure in mastectomy. The patients were divided into two groups, and the two groups were distinguished by the use of two different types of wound closure. In the intradermal suture group, intradermal suture using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire was implemented. In the conventional closure group, the incision was closed using the interrupted transcutaneous pattern with Chinese silk (Fig. 1). These two sutures were removed when the wounds were adequately healed (i.e., re-establishment of normal tissue integrity).

All patients were provided with a drainage tube and suction bottle to prevent subcutaneous seroma following mastectomy. All patients received chemotherapy and the same follow-up plan, including chest-abdominal computed tomography and tumor markers, was implemented every 3 months (18,19). The scars were assessed 25 weeks following mastectomy. All scars were assessed independently by three observers (one oncologist and two breast cancer research associates) on the same day, using the VSS. The VSS observes four physical characteristics of scars: Vascularity, pigmentation, pliability and height (20,21). Each variable contains ranked subscales that may be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 13, with 0 representing normal skin (Table I) (20,21).

Table I.

Vancouver Scar Scale for assessment of the physical characteristics of scars.

Table I.

Vancouver Scar Scale for assessment of the physical characteristics of scars.

CharacteristicScore
Vascularity
  Normal0
  Pink1
  Red2
  Purple3
Pigmentation
  Normal0
  Hypopigmentation1
  Hyperpigmentation2
Pliability
  Normal0
  Supple (flexible with minimal resistance)1
  Yielding (gives way to pressure)2
  Firm (inflexible not easily moved; resistant to manual pressure)3
  Ropes (rope-like tissue that blanches with extension of scar)4
  Contracture (permanent shortening of scar leading to deformity or distortion)5
Height, mm
  Normal (flat)0
  <21
  2–52
  >53
Total score13
Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using computer software SPSS (version 16.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In the present study, the differences between the baseline characteristics of patients were compared using Fisher's exact test for the different categories and independent sample t-test for continuous variables. The endpoint means of the VSS scores were analyzed using independent sample t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Characteristics of enrolled patients

All patients completed the present study. The baseline characteristics of the patients were provided (Table II). The present study compared the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The groups were similar in terms of mean age (P>0.05), body mass index (P>0.05), operating time (P>0.05), blood loss (P>0.05), length of post-operative hospital stay (P>0.05), pathological stage (7th edition; American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control tumor-node-metastasis staging systems; P>0.05) and medical history (P>0.05) (22).

Table II.

Comparison of the baseline characteristics of patients who underwent mastectomy (n=98).

Table II.

Comparison of the baseline characteristics of patients who underwent mastectomy (n=98).

CharacteristicsActive group (n=50)Control group (n=48)χ2 or t-valueP-value
Mean ± SD age, years47.38±11.6446.58±11.790.337 (t-value)0.737
BMI, kg/m226.55±4.3827.17±4.210.710 (t-value)0.479
Diabetes, n (%)01 (2.08)  0.490
Pulmonary history (COPD), n (%)1 (2.00)0  1.000
Cardiac history (coronary disease), n (%)01 (2.08)  0.490
Smoking history, n (%)2 (4.00)2 (4.17)  0.676
Working outside the home, n (%)  6 (12.00)4 (8.33)  0.741
Pathological stage, n (%)    1.344 (χ2-value)0.969
  I1 (2.00)1 (2.08)
  IIA12 (24.00)12 (25.00)
  IIB15 (30.00)17 (35.42)
  IIIA  9 (18.00)  8 (16.67)
  IIIB11 (22.00)  9 (18.75)
  IIIC1 (2.00)1 (2.08)
  IV1 (2.00)0
Mean ± SD operating time, min100.98±11.31103.54±11.011.135 (t-value)0.259
Mean ± SD blood loss, ml52.30±17.5850.08±15.820.655 (t-value)0.514
Mean ± SD postoperative hospital stay, days4.36±0.834.45±0.970.542 (t-value)0.589

[i] BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SD, standard deviation.

Cosmetic outcome

Results demonstrated that the mean VSS score of the active group was decreased (indicating improved cosmetic outcome) compared with that of the control group (P<0.001; Table III). The four features of the VSS scores differed statistically (P<0.001). The cosmetic results of suturing for four cases are also presented in Fig. 2. A comparison of cosmetic results between the experimental and control groups is shown in Fig. 3, and statistical differences between the active and control groups are shown.

Table III.

Vancouver Scar Scale scores for the active and the control group.

Table III.

Vancouver Scar Scale scores for the active and the control group.

OutcomeaActive group (n=50)Control group (n=48)t-valueP-value
Vancouver Scar Scale score4.86±0.977.54±1.3011.518<0.001
  Vascularity1.30±0.581.92±0.714.718<0.001
  Pigmentation1.14±0.401.63±2.165.336<0.001
  Pliability1.34±0.522.27±0.846.543<0.001
  Height1.08±0.401.73±0.685.771<0.001

a mean ± standard deviation.

Unexpected benefits of using memory alloy wire in patients with diabetes

Aside from improved recovery from the surgical wound, the present study also observed accelerated wound healing in both groups. The mean number of wound healing days required to take out stitches was decreased for the active group compared with that for the control group in patients with diabetes (P=0.0026; Fig. 4). Results indicated that using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire was able to decrease the days of wound healing required between patients with diabetes and their non-diabetic counterparts (P=0.7009; Fig. 4). Results of the present study suggested that using memory alloy facilitated wound healing.

Discussion

In the present study, the scar of patients in the active group was limited to a light spot in the majority of cases. The results of the present study indicated that patients whose incisions were closed using intradermal suture with Ti-Ni memory alloy wire suture exhibited an improved cosmetic outcome compared with those for whom incisions were closed using the interrupted suturing technique. The cosmetic outcome was assessed using VSS. VSS is a reliable, comprehensive approach for assessing linear surgical scars (23). VSS assesses four subjective variables (vascularity, pigmentation, pliability and height) within a range of 0–13 for the total score (calculated as the sum of all four subjective variables scores), where a lower score (0–4) indicates improved healing (21).

In China, certain surgeons use discontinuous silk suture to close the skin incision (9,24). Therefore, suture track scars are present on each side of the incision in numerous cases and one can observe a suture reaction, inflammation, liquefaction, infection or incision dehiscence requiring secondary suture (4). Scars are usually caused by excessive repair of skin wounds due to excessive proliferation, activation and migration of fibroblasts. Increase in the biosynthesis of fibroblasts cause excessive collagen deposition of extracellular matrix (25,26). Collagen fibers also form here as a result of the body synthesizing collagen at an increased rate compared with that at which it catabolizes collagen over a longer period of time (27,28).

The present study indicated that continuous intradermal suture was able to decrease scar formation compared with the control group, although patients exhibited scar hyperplasia. Despite this, intradermal suture may decrease the discomfort the hyperplastic scar causes, including prominent surface, thick texture, local pain, heat-induced itch. Intradermal suture may also improve the function of sleep quality (2931). Typically, the time taken for wounds to heal in patients without diabetes is decreased compared with patients with diabetes (3235). Consistent with these previous studies, it was indicated in the present study that the time taken for wounds to heal in patients with diabetes was increased compared with that of the patients without diabetes in the control group. However, the time taken for wounds to heal in patients with and without diabetes was similar in the active group. Furthermore, it was indicated that the time taken for wounds to heal in patients with diabetes differed significantly between the active and control groups, the healing time of active groups was shorter compared with that of control groups. The present study suggested that continuous intradermal suture of incision with Ti-Ni memory alloy wire may promote skin incisions to heal and decrease scar hyperplasia, and therefore this method may be recommended to other surgeons for patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary surgery.

The present study was a retrospective, observational cohort study and had a number of limitations. The present study was not double blind, which may have generated bias. The 2-year follow-up period was short, and the prognosis of disease was not assessed. VSS reflects the different physical characteristics carried out by the observer, reflecting different physiological aspects of wound healing and scar maturation. The present study identified that VSS scores objectively reflected scar maturation. However, the VSS does not include a self-assessment of the patient outcome.

To conclude, the intradermal suture technique offers an improved cosmetic outcome for patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary surgery. The present study suggested that intradermal suture using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire may represent an effective means of inhibiting scars from forming following mastectomy. For patients undergoing intradermal suture using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire, the scar was less noticeable and wound healing was improved compared with the control group, particularly in patients with diabetes.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (grant nos. 81402506 and 81602597).

References

1 

Akram M and Siddiqui SA: Breast cancer management: Past, present and evolving. Indian J Cancer. 49:277–282. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Sehl M, Lu X, Silliman R and Ganz PA: Decline in physical functioning in first 2 years after breast cancer diagnosis predicts 10-year survival in older women. J Cancer Surviv. 7:20–31. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Derks MG, de Glas NA, Bastiaannet E, de Craen AJ, Portielje JE, van de Velde CJ, van Leeuwen FE and Liefers GJ: Physical functioning in older patients with breast cancer: A prospective cohort study in the TEAM trial. Oncologist. 7:946–953. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Joyce CW, Murphy S, Murphy S, Kelly JL and Morrison CM: Scar wars: Preferences in breast surgery. Arch Plast Surg. 42:596–600. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Zhang ZT, Zhang HW, Fang XD, Wang LM, Li XX, Li YF, Sun XW, Carver J, Simpkins D, Shen J and Weisberg M: Cosmetic outcome and surgical site infection rates of antibacterial absorbable (Polyglactin 910) suture compared to Chinese silk suture in breast cancer surgery: A randomized pilot research. Chin Med J (Engl). 124:719–724. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Ünsal MG, Dural AC, Çelik MF, Akarsu C, Başoğlu İ, Dilege ME, Kapan S and Alış H: The adaptation process of a teaching and research hospital to changing trends in modern breast surgery. Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 31:34–38. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Peyser PM, Abel JA, Straker VF, Hall VL and Rainsbury RM: Ultraconservative skin-sparing ‘keyhole’ mastectomy and immediate breast and areola reconstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 82:227–235. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Shrotria S: The periareolar incision - gateway to the breast! Eur J Surg Oncol. 27:601–603. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Wang J, Zhang YF, Wang X, Wang J, Yang X, Gao YQ and Fang Y: Treatment outcomes of occult breast carcinoma and prognostic analyses. Chin Med J (Engl). 126:3026–3029. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Hoeller U, Kuhlmey A, Bajrovic A, Grader K, Berger J, Tribius S, Fehlauer F and Alberti W: Cosmesis from the patient's and the doctor's view. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 57:3452003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

O'Kane S: Wound remodeling and scarring. J Wound Care. 11:296–299. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Truong PT, Lee JC, Soer B, Gaul CA and Olivotto IA: Reliability and validity testing of the patient and observer scar assessment scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 119:487–494. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Neelakantan L, Zglinski JK, Frotscher M and Eggeler G: Design and fabrication of a bending rotation fatigue test rig for in situ electrochemical analysis during fatigue testing of NiTi shape memory alloy wires. Rev Sci Instrum. 84:0351022013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Kinoshita T, Takasugi M, Iwamoto E, Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T and Terui S: Sentinel lymph node biopsy examination for breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg. 191:225–229. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Yamamoto T, Takahashi S, Ichihara K, Hiyama Y, Uehara T, Hashimoto J, Hirobe M and Masumori N: How do we understand the disagreement in the frequency of surgical site infection between the CDC and Clavien-Dindo classifications? J Infect Chemother. 21:130–133. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Li YJ, Huang XE and Zhou XD: Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery for Paget's disease: A meta-analysis. Breast Care (Basel). 9:431–434. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Ouldamer L, Bonastre J, Brunet-Houdard S, Body G, Giraudeau B and Caille A: Dead space closure with quilting suture versus conventional closure with drainage for the prevention of seroma after mastectomy for breast cancer (QUISERMAS): Protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open. 6:e0099032016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

MacFater H, MacFater W, Hill A and Lill M: Individualised follow-up booklets improve recall and satisfaction for cancer patients. N Z Med J. 130:39–45. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Allinson VM and Dent J: Supportive care after breast cancer surgery. Nurs Times. 110:20–23. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Pauline T, Truong F, Yong CM, Hayashi A, Runkel JA, Phillips T and Olivotto IA: Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the vancouver scar scale, short-form mcgill pain questionnaire and patients' perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg. 116:1291–1299. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Nedelec B, Shankowsky HA and Tredget EE: Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: Comparison of the vancouver scar scale and scar volume. J Burn Care Rehabil. 21:205–212. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Ursaru M, Jari I, Popescu R, Negru D, Naum A and Scripcariu V: Multifactorial analysis of local and lymph node recurrences after conservative or radical surgery for stage 0–II breast cancer. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 118:1062–1067. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Kaartinen IS, Välisuo PO, Bochko V, Alander JT and Kuokkanen HO: How to assess scar hypertrophy - a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method. Wound Repair Regen. 19:316–323. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Zhao WX, Wang B, Yan SY and Zhang LY: Strategy of points, lines and layers in needle assisted laparoscope functional modified neck dissection through bilateral breast approach. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 54:823–827. 2016.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

25 

Liebl H and Kloth LC: Skin cell proliferation stimulated by microneedles. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 4:2–6. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Guo J, Lin Q, Shao Y, Rong L and Zhang D: miR-29b promotes skin wound healing and reduces excessive scar formation by inhibition of the TGF-β1/Smad/CTGF signaling pathway. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 95:437–442. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Li J, Chen L, Cao C, Yan H, Zhou B, Gao Y, Li Q and Li J: The long non-coding RNA LncRNA8975-1 is upregulated in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts and controls collagen expression. Cell Physiol Biochem. 40:326–334. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Li H, Yang L, Zhang Y and Gao Z: Kaempferol inhibits fibroblast collagen synthesis, proliferation and activation in hypertrophic scar via targeting TGF-β receptor type I. Biomed Pharmacother. 83:967–974. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kotaluoto S, Pauniaho SL, Helminen M, Kuokkanen H and Rantanen T: Wound healing after open appendectomies in adult patients: A prospective, randomised trial comparing two methods of wound closure. World J Surg. 36:2305–2310. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Koskela A, Kotaluoto S, Kaartinen I, Pauniaho SL, Rantanen T and Kuokkanen H: Continuous absorbable intradermal sutures yield better cosmetic results than nonabsorbable interrupted sutures in open appendectomy wounds: A prospective, randomized trial. World J Surg. 38:1044–1050. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Paolini S, Morace R, Lanzino G, Missori P, Nano G, Cantore G and Esposito V: Absorbable intradermal closure of elective craniotomy wounds. Neurosurgery. 62 Suppl 2:ONS490–ONS492. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J and Mirastschijski U: Skin wound healing: An update on the current knowledge and concepts. Eur Surg Res. 58:81–94. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Nouvong A, Ambrus AM, Zhang ER, Hultman L and Coller HA: Reactive oxygen species and bacterial biofilms in diabetic wound healing. Physiol Genomics. 48:889–896. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Reed GW, Salehi N, Giglou PR, Kafa R, Malik U, Maier M and Shishehbor MH: Time to wound healing and major adverse limb events in patients with critical limb ischemia treated with endovascular revascularization. Ann Vasc Surg. 36:190–198. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Khamaisi M, Katagiri S, Keenan H, Park K, Maeda Y, Li Q, Qi W, Thomou T, Eschuk D, Tellechea A, et al: PKCδ inhibition normalizes the wound-healing capacity of diabetic human fibroblasts. J Clin Invest. 126:837–853. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2018
Volume 15 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li G, Qin S, Sun X, Wang J, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Zhang J, Tang SC and Ren H: Retrospective observational cohort study on cosmetic outcome of using Ti‑Ni memory alloy wire for intradermal suture following mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Oncol Lett 15: 2465-2470, 2018.
APA
Li, G., Qin, S., Sun, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J. ... Ren, H. (2018). Retrospective observational cohort study on cosmetic outcome of using Ti‑Ni memory alloy wire for intradermal suture following mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Oncology Letters, 15, 2465-2470. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7603
MLA
Li, G., Qin, S., Sun, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Tang, S., Ren, H."Retrospective observational cohort study on cosmetic outcome of using Ti‑Ni memory alloy wire for intradermal suture following mastectomy in patients with breast cancer". Oncology Letters 15.2 (2018): 2465-2470.
Chicago
Li, G., Qin, S., Sun, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Tang, S., Ren, H."Retrospective observational cohort study on cosmetic outcome of using Ti‑Ni memory alloy wire for intradermal suture following mastectomy in patients with breast cancer". Oncology Letters 15, no. 2 (2018): 2465-2470. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7603