Open Access

Suppression of tumor cell proliferation and migration by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: A possible role for apoptosis and Wnt signaling

  • Authors:
    • Yin Yuan
    • Chang Zhou
    • Xuan Chen
    • Changli Tao
    • Huiqing Cheng
    • Xin Lu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 28, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8368
  • Pages: 8536-8544
  • Copyright: © Yuan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Human umbilical cord‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSCs) represent potential therapeutic tools for solid tumors. However, there are numerous inconsistent results regarding the effects of hUCMSCs on tumors, and the mechanisms underlying this remain poorly understood. The present study further examined this controversial issue by analyzing the molecular mechanisms of the inhibitory effects of hUCMSCs on the proliferation and migration of the human lung cancer A549 cell line and the human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) BEL7402 cell line in vitro. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that hUCMSCs arrested tumor cells in specific phases of the cell cycle and induced the apoptosis of tumor cells by using the hUCMSC‑conditioned medium (hUCMSC‑CM). The hUCMSC‑CM also attenuated the migratory abilities of the two tumor cell types. Furthermore, the expression of B‑cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‑2), the pro‑form of caspase‑7 (pro‑caspase‑7), β‑catenin and c‑Myc was downregulated, while that of ephrin receptor (EphA5), a biomarker of cancer cell dormancy, was slightly increased in these two tumor cell lines treated with hUCMSC‑CM. Specifically, when co‑cultured via direct cell‑to‑cell contact, hUCMSCs were able to spontaneously fuse with any of the two types of solid tumor cells. These observations suggested that hUCMSCs may be a promising candidate for the biological therapy of lung cancer and HCC. Future studies should focus on detailed evidence for cell fusion, as well as other mechanisms proposed in the present study, by introducing additional experimental approaches and models.

Introduction

Solid tumors are often malignant and are a serious threat to human health. At present, lung carcinoma is the most common type of malignancy and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer-associated mortality (1,2). Surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy remains a common treatment for malignant tumors (3,4). However, these treatments are rarely curative. Therefore, the development of specific and highly efficient therapies is important. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSCs), derived from the umbilical cord matrix, have been proposed as a promising tool for the attenuation of tumor growth and metastasis (5).

hUCMSCs are a type of adult stem cell exhibiting primitive stem cell characteristics, including self-renewal and multi-potency. Following specific induction, hUCMSCs may differentiate into cardiomyocytes, neuron-like cells, skeletal muscle, endothelial cells and pancreatic islet-like cell clusters (6). Therefore, the initial research on hUCMSCs primarily focused on their multi-directional differentiation ability, which is applicable for repairing damaged tissues. At present, human MSCs used in experiments are primarily acquired from adult bone marrow. Compared with bone marrow-derived MSCs, hUCMSCs have several advantages for use in cell-based therapy, including improved expansion capability, painless collection procedures and lower risk of viral contamination. In addition, these MSCs also share important characteristics, including low immunogenicity, cytokine secretion and transdifferentiation, which favor their potent application in the development of novel tumor therapies (79).

Along with the frequent research into the use of hUCMSCs as a tool for cancer treatment, the interactions between hUCMSCs and malignant cells have been increasingly reported. However, there are numerous inconsistent results regarding the effects of hUCMSCs on tumors. In breast carcinoma models, the interferon-β-transfected hUCMSCs were capable of migrating to tumor sites and attenuating the proliferation of human triple-negative breast carcinoma MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T cell lines (10). For glioma, hUCMSCs exerted antitumor effects by inhibiting proliferation, modulating the cell cycle in G0/G1 phase, and downregulating the expression of β-catenin and c-Myc in C6 glioma cells (11); hUCMSCs may also induce apoptosis in glioma U251 cells, resulting in the significant upregulation of apoptotic genes, including caspase-3 and caspase-9, and the significant downregulation of anti-apoptotic genes, including survivin and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (12). By contrast, other studies (13,14) have indicated that hUCMSCs may promote tumor proliferation in the tumor microenvironment. For example, hUCMSCs activated by macrophages promote the proliferation and migration of gastric epithelial cells and gastric cancer cells (13); in addition, esophageal carcinoma (EC) cells recruit hUCMSCs, and hUCMSCs promote EC cell migration and invasion illustrated by the upregulation of metastasis-related proteins, including matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 in EC cells co-cultured with hUCMSCs (14).

In order to better understand the interactions between hUCMSCs and specific tumor types, the present study further examined this controversial issue by analyzing the underlying mechanisms of the influence of hUCMSCs on the lung cancer A549 cell line and the hepatocellular cancer BEL7402 cell line via indirect and direct co-culture. The results indicated that hUCMSCs inhibit lung cancer and HCC cell progression by inducing apoptosis and targeting Wnt signaling, and possibly via direct cell-to-cell contact.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

hUCMSCs were isolated from the umbilical cords of healthy neonates delivered in local hospitals with the written informed consent of their mothers. The research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the School of Life Science and Biopharmacology of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University (Guangzhou, China). Separation, expansion and identification of hUCMSCs were performed as previously described (15). Cells at passage 3 to 8, displaying a homogeneous MSC immunophenotype and multipotent differentiation potential into adipocytic, osteoblastic and chondrocytic lineages (data not shown), were selected for experiments.

The human lung cancer A549 cell line and the human HCC BEL7402 cell line were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Zhejiang Tianhang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2, according to the American Type Culture Collection protocols.

Treatment of tumor cells with conditioned medium from hUCMSCs

hUCMSCs were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/F12 (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS to 100% confluence. The culture medium was then harvested, filtered through 0.22-µm pore sterile filters (Pall Life Sciences, Port Washington, NY, USA), and stored at −80°C in aliquots until use. A mixture of the aforementioned supernatant derived from hUCMSCs and RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS at a volume ratio of 3:2, designated as hUCMSC-CM, was subsequently used to treat tumor cell lines at 37°C for 72 h. During the incubation time, the hUCMSC-CM was replaced every 24 h (16) to prevent the rapid acidification of culture medium due to the pre-mixing of hUCMSC supernatant with fresh medium and to replenish the degradation of bioactive substances in hUCMSC-CM. In the control group, the same tumor cells were cultured with DMEM/F12 medium without FBS for 72 h.

Cell cycle analysis

A total of 1×106 cells were harvested, washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 70% cold ethanol and stained with 5 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in the dark for 15 min at 37°C. The DNA content of the stained cells was detected using a flow cytometer (Gallios; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) and analyzed using ModFit software (Verity Software House, Inc., Topsham, ME, USA).

Transwell migration assay

After culturing at 37°C for 72 h with or without hUCMSC-CM, the A549 and BEL7402 cells (1×105 cells/well) were plated into the top chambers of Transwell plates (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA). RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS was placed into the bottom chambers, followed by incubation at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 for 24 h. The cells that did not penetrate the polycarbonate membrane were removed with cotton stickers. The membrane was then fixed in 100% methanol at room temperature for 15 min. Subsequently, the morphological differences between the two tumor cell types became less clear. To distinguish them properly, two different staining agents, eosin and crystal violet, which are common in Transwell assays of tumor cells (17,18), were used to stain A549 cells and BEL7402 cells at room temperature for 5 min, respectively. The migratory ability of tumor cells was determined by counting the number of cells that had penetrated the membrane using a light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), in at least 5 fields for each assay (magnification, ×400).

Cell apoptosis assay

An Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/PI apoptosis detection kit (MBL International Co., Woburn, MA, USA) was used to examine the percentage of apoptotic cells. In brief, 1×105 cells were washed with cold PBS and re-suspended in binding buffer provided in the aforementioned kit. Cells were incubated at room temperature with 10 µl Annexin V-FITC and 5 µl PI for 15 min, and were then analyzed using a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and FlowJo software 7.6.1 (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA).

Western blot analysis

Protein expression was measured via western blot analysis. Total protein was extracted from A549 and BEL7402 cells with ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechonology, Shanghai, China), and the protein concentration was determined using Bradford reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). A quantity of 30 µg total protein per lane was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The membranes were then blocked by 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at 4°C under agitation, followed by incubation with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight against EphA5 (cat. no. sc-1014; 1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), Bcl-2 (cat. no. 32124; 1:1,000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), pro caspase-7 (cat. no. 32067; 1:1,000; Abcam), β-catenin (cat. no. 8480; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) and c-Myc (cat. no. 5605; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.). An antibody against GAPDH (cat. no. AB-P-R001; 1:1,000; Hangzhou Goodhere Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China; http://www.goodhere.com/) was used as the loading control. Membranes were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (cat. no. ZB-2301; OriGene Technologies, Inc., Beijing, China) at a dilution of 1:5,000 for 1 h at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized by incubating the membranes with enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and recorded on X-film (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). Protein expression was quantified by densitometry using ImageJ software 1.51 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Cell co-culture and detection

Cell fusion experiments based on direct contact between tumor cell lines and hUCMSCs were performed as previously described (19,20) with slight modification. Tumor cells (A549 and BEL7402) and hUCMSCs were labeled with DIO and DID fluorescent dyes (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), respectively, according to the manufacturer's protocols. Next, a total of 1×104 DIO-labeled tumor cells were mixed with the DID-labeled hUCMSCs, at a ratio of 1:1, in 100-mm glass bottom dishes or 6-well cell culture plates containing DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin; these were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Monochrome fluorescence-labeled hUCMSCs or tumor cells cultured alone were set as controls. The co-cultured cells were observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (FluoView FV1000, Olympus Corporation) at a magnification of ×400 every 2–3 days and the images obtained were analyzed using FV10-ASW 1.6 software (Olympus Corporation) according to the manufacturer's protocol. On day 8 of co-culture, the hybrids (double-stained cells) were further confirmed using a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and the fusion efficiency was calculated using FlowJo software 7.6.1 (FlowJo LLC).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) software and GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The Student's t-test was used to test the probability of significant differences between groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

hUCMSC-CM influences the cell cycle of A549 and BEL7402 cells

We hypothesized that the influence of the supernatant from hUCMSCs on the growth of A549 and BEL7402 tumor cells may be associated with altered cell cycle progression. As expected, the analysis of cell cycle distribution indicated that A549 tumor cells were arrested in the G1 phase, as illustrated by an increased number of cells in the G1 phase (Fig. 1A). This was accompanied by a corresponding reduction in the number of cells in the S phase following incubation with hUCMSC-CM. The results for BEL7402 cells treated with hUCMSC-CM were different, with an increased cell number in the S phase and a corresponding reduction in the G1 phase population (Fig. 1A). Overall, analysis of the cell cycle distribution revealed that hUCMSC-CM inhibited the proliferation of tumor cells by arresting the cell cycle in specific phases.

hUCMSC-CM inhibits the migration of A549 and BEL7402 cells

The effect of hUCMSC-CM on the migration of A549 and BEL7402 tumor cells was investigated using 24-well polycarbonate Transwell inserts. The results revealed that fewer A549 and BEL7402 cells were able to cross the membrane following treatment with hUCMSC-CM, compared with the control group (P<0.05; Fig. 1B). Therefore, hUCMSC-CM markedly reduced the migratory abilities of A549 and BEL7402 tumor cells.

hUCMSC-CM induces the apoptosis of A549 and BEL7402 cells. In order to investigate whether apoptosis was involved in the hUCMSC-mediated inhibition of tumor cell growth, flow cytometric analysis was performed using Annexin V/PI staining. As demonstrated in Fig. 1C, incubation with hUCMSC-CM induced a significant increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells, with 46.27±9.96% of A549 tumor cells and 18.23±6.66% of BEL7402 tumor cells in late-stage apoptosis (P<0.05; Fig. 1C). Taken together, these results demonstrated that hUCMSC-CM induced the apoptosis of cancer cells.

hUCMSC-CM modulates molecular expression changes in A549 and BEL7402 cells

The results of western blot analysis revealed that hUCMSC-CM slightly increased the expression of EphA5, which has been identified as a biomarker of cancer cell dormancy. hUCMSC-CM also resulted in the downregulation of Bcl-2 and caspase-7 in these two tumor cell types (Fig. 2A and B). The primary antibody against caspase-7 (cat. no. 32067; Abcam) that was used in the present study only recognizes the pro-form but does not react with cleaved forms of caspase-7. Accordingly, the caspase-7 bands in Fig. 2A presented the pro-form, but not the cleaved form of caspase-7. Wnt signaling is known to serve critical roles in regulating the proliferation and progression of tumor cells. Therefore, the involvement of Wnt signaling was investigated in the present study. The expression levels of β-catenin and c-Myc, two key signaling molecules in the Wnt pathway, were downregulated in A549 and BEL7402 tumor cells treated with hUCMSC-CM. Taken together, these results indicated the involvement of cell apoptosis molecules, as well as that of the Wnt signaling pathway, in the inhibitory effects of hUCMSCs on A549 and BEL7402 tumor cells.

Co-culture of hUCMSCs with A549 and BEL7402 cells induces cell fusion

hUCMSCs were mixed with the two solid tumor cell types by direct cell-to-cell co-culture. The cell fusion event and cell fusion efficiency were demonstrated using confocal laser-scanning microscopy and flow cytometry, respectively. After co-culture for 72 h in vitro, the hUCMSCs were revealed to have merged into A549 or BEL7402 tumor cells, as illustrated by the existence of bi-nucleated hybrid cells of dual color (DiO and DiD double-stained cells), which were detected by confocal laser-scanning microscopy (Fig. 3). Following co-culture for 8 days, flow cytometry revealed that the fusion efficiencies were approximately 79.0±2.6% in A549 cells and 76.4±4.3% in BEL7402 cells (Fig. 4).

Discussion

Increasing evidence has indicated that adult stem cells may be effective therapeutic tools for cancer therapy (21,22). hUCMSCs are a group of adult stem cells that are easy to collect, may be expanded extensively in vitro and have a low immunogenicity. It is important to study the effects of hUCMSCs on tumor growth in order to develop novel therapies for the treatment of cancer. Recently, certain studies have reported that hUCMSCs have an intrinsic ability to attenuate the growth of several types of cancer cells. Ma et al (23) directly injected hUCMSCs into an immunodeficient xenograft mouse model transplanted with MDA-MB-231 breast cancer stem cells. The hUCMSCs reduced tumor volume and tumor weight in these mice. Zhang et al (24) reported that modified hUCMSCs that were transfected with the inerleukin-21 gene inhibited the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Subramanian et al (25) confirmed that hUCMSCs did not transform into tumor-associated fibroblasts, making them safer than bone marrow MSCs.

In our previous study, hUCMSCs were successfully separated from the umbilical cords of healthy donors (15). hUCMSCs have the general characteristics of MSCs. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of hUCMSCs on the malignant behaviors, including proliferation, migration and survival capabilities, of the two types of solid tumor cells in vitro. Cell proliferation is specifically controlled in the G1 phase and the G1/S phase transition in the cell cycle. When cell cycle analysis was conducted, significantly more tumor cells were observed in the G1/S phase following treatment with hUCMSC-CM in vitro. However, the cell cycle arrest in these two types of tumor cells was different. Lung cancer A549 cells were arrested in the G0/G1 phase, while HCC BEL7402 cells were arrested in the S phase of the cell cycle. Therefore, we hypothesized that hUCMSCs may interfere with the growth of tumor cells through regulating cell cycle arrest in different phases. These outcomes also suggest that the anticancer effect of hUCMSCs may depend on the specific types of tumor cells. Metastasis is one of the most important biological behaviors of malignant tumors. The present study demonstrated that hUCMSCs also significantly inhibited the migratory behavior of the two types of tumor cells in Transwell chambers. Furthermore, it was revealed that hUCMSC-CM significantly increased the proportion of Annexin V/PI-positive cells. Consistently, the western blot analysis revealed that hUCMSC-CM inhibited the expression of apoptosis-related proteins, including Bcl-2 and pro caspase-7, in A549 and BEL7402 cells. Caspase-7 has been identified as a major contributor to the execution of apoptosis. During apoptosis, caspase-7 is activated through proteolytic processing to produce the mature and active subunits, resulting in the decrease of pro-caspase-7 and emergence of cleaved caspase-7 (26). Therefore, the downregulation of pro-caspase-7, as well as that of Bcl-2, indicated the activation of intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways, and constituted the molecular mechanisms underlying the hUCMSC-induced apoptosis of tumor cells.

To further investigate other molecular mechanisms by which hUCMSCs inhibited tumor cells, the present study focused on the influence of hUCMSC-CM on Wnt signaling and tumor dormancy biomarkers in A549 and BEL7402 tumor cells.

Wnt/β-catenin signaling has been demonstrated to serve an important role in regulating tumor initiation and progression in various malignant tumor types, including lung cancer and HCC (27,28). Furthermore, Wnt signaling may regulate genes that are involved in cell-cycle regulation and cell apoptosis, including Cyclin and Bcl-2 (29). Therefore, we hypothesized that this signaling pathway may be involved in governing the inhibitory effects of hUCMSCs on lung cancer A549 cells and HCC BEL7402 cells. β-catenin is a key mediator in Wnt signaling, regulating multiple cellular functions. Stabilized β-catenin translocates into the nucleus, binds with T-cell factor/lymphoid-enhancing factor transcriptional factors and regulates the expression of downstream β-catenin-dependent genes, including cyclin D1 and c-Myc (30). The results of western blot analysis in the present study demonstrated that the treatment of A549 and BEL7402 cells with hUCMSC-CM resulted in the downregulation of β-catenin. To further assess whether known β-catenin targets were also reduced, the expression of c-Myc was analyzed. Consistent with the observed reduction in β-catenin, the expression levels of c-Myc in these two tumor cell types receiving hUCMSC-CM were also downregulated. These molecular data revealed that the hUCMSC-mediated tumor inhibition was associated with the depression of Wnt signaling in the two tumor cell types. It has been demonstrated that MSCs may secret bioactive molecules, including signaling proteins, cytokines and chemokines, into culture medium (31). Some of these soluble factors may have helped the triggering of the downregulation of Wnt signaling in tumor cells.

Tumor dormancy describes a process through which malignant cells exit the cell cycle and survive in a quiescent state (32). Namely, the dormant cancer cells usually experience the static stage at which they do not proliferate or no longer enter the cell cycle. The maintenance or reversal of tumor dormancy involves the changes of a series of malignant biological behaviors, including the metastasis, proliferation and apoptosis of tumor cells in a specific environment. Accordingly, one possible explanation for tumor dormancy is proliferative arrest, and the other is the equilibrium between proliferation and apoptosis (32). At the beginning of the present study, it was observed that hUCMSCs induced cell cycle arrest, an increase in apoptosis and a decrease in the migration of A549 and BEL7402 tumor cells, which indicated the possible involvement of dormancy mechanisms. However, it has been demonstrated that the interactions between cancer cells and their normal neighbors act as an important microenvironmental control of the onset and maintenance of dormancy during cancer development (33). MSCs are one of the critical components in the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesized that MSCs may also serve a role in tumor dormancy. On the basis of the aforementioned speculations, the present study aimed to investigate the expression of dormancy-specific biomarkers (34). EphA5, one of the tumor dormancy markers that was detected, was upregulated at the mRNA and protein levels in the two tumor cell types following incubation with hUCMSC-CM. This may be a possible explanation for how hUCMSCs support tumor dormancy. Similarly, Glick and Yuspa (35) observed that the tumor microenvironment may inhibit or reverse the malignant characteristics of tumor cells that are in a dormant state, and tumors are able to develop only when the stability of the microenvironment is disrupted. Alt-Holland et al (36) also proposed that the signaling network interaction between tumor cells and adjacent normal cells may control tumor growth and maintain the dormancy of tumor cells.

The majority of solid tumor cells and MSCs are adherent cells. Therefore, in order to avoid the interference of MSCs with the detection of tumor cells, the majority of experiments prefer to culture tumor cells with conditioned medium from MSCs. However, MSCs will inevitably come into contact with tumor cells after entering the body when they are used for tumor therapy. To better reflect this situation, in the present study, hUCMSCs were co-cultured with the two solid tumor cell types by direct cell-to-cell contact. With confocal scanning, bi-nucleated hybrid cells were observed due to the fusion of hUCMSCs with the co-cultured tumor cells, and it was re-affirmed by flow cytometry. Specifically, hybrid cells with two clear nuclei were observed until the end of 6 days of confocal tracking in the present study (data not shown), which may aid in distinguishing cell fusion from other mechanisms, including phagocytosis among cells as well as endocytosis of MSC-secreted exosomes to a certain extent. Phagocytosis refers to the process of specifically engulfing and destroying particulate targets via diverse mechanisms (37). Targets of phagocytosis include microorganisms, dead or dying cells, and environmental debris. By contrast, cell fusion is a nuclear reprogramming process that involves fusing two or more cell types to form a single identity and generally does not cause deadly damage to the two sides of the fusion (19). However, membranous vesicle transport, particularly the exosome-mediated endocytosis, is one of the important mechanisms by which mesenchymal stem cells exert their biological functions, possibly including the communication between MSCs and tumor cells (38). Exosomes and other extracellular vesicles belong to subcellular components without nuclear structures, although they usually contain cell-specific proteins, lipids and nucleic acids. However, in the present study, bi-nucleated cells were observed under confocal microscope, which indicated the direct fusion of hUCMSCs into tumor cells. Considering the limitations of the present study, including the absence of electron microscopy data, the aforementioned observation does not exclude the involvement of exosomes or other mechanisms, but emphasized the potential roles of cell fusion in the crosstalk between MSCs and tumor cells.

It has been widely demonstrated that numerous cell types in the tumor microenvironment are able to merge with malignant cells by cell fusion (39,40). As one of the critical components in the tumor microenvironment, MSCs are also a putative fusogenic candidate. Similarly, the study of Wei et al (19) co-cultured RFP-expressing MSCs with eGFP-expressing lung cancer H441 cells without any fusogenic agent and demonstrated that MSCs fuse spontaneously with lung cancer cells. Transcriptome profiles revealed that the lung cancer cells are reprogrammed to slow growth and a stem-like state upon MSC fusion, accomplished by the restoration of p21 function and the upregulation of forkhead box F1, a putative tumor suppressor (19). Wang et al (20) also generated fusion progeny by fusing DiD-labeled MSCs and DiO-labeled esophageal carcinoma cells with PEG1500, and confirmed that the fusion aids in controlling the malignant phenotype of esophageal cancer cells.

In summary, the results of the present study suggested that hUCMSCs may inhibit the malignant biological behaviors of human lung cancer and hepatocellular cancer cells in vitro by activating cell apoptosis and inhibiting Wnt signaling. hUCMSCs also have the potential ability to induce tumor dormancy, at least through the mechanism of cell cycle arrest. In addition, the present study provided evidence to support spontaneous cell fusion between hUCMSCs and tumor cells, which may contribute to the antitumor effects of hUCMSCs. Unlike individual molecules, including protein and DNA/RNA, each complete cell is functionally independent and the cell-cell interaction involves complex mechanisms. As a preliminary attempt to investigate such a complicated issue, the present study may only provide limited conclusions for the time being. Notably, the results of the present study provide valuable clues for in-depth research on the interactions between MSCs and tumors, including the identification of bioactive molecules in hUCMSC-CM as upstream modulators of Wnt signaling. Therefore, the mechanisms emphasized in the present study warrant further efforts by using additional approaches and more suitable models in the future.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr Danliang Chen of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (Guangdong, China) and Dr Liqin Zhao in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Guangdong, China) for their help in umbilical cord collection.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81502973), the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 2014A030310259 and 2015A030310310) and the Innovative School Project of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University (grant no. 2014KQNCX142).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

XL and YY designed the experiments. YY performed the hUCMSC isolation. CZ performed tumor cell culture. YY, CZ, and XC performed Transwell assay and western blot analysis. YY and XC performed flow cytometric analyses. CT and XL performed confocal laser scanning and image analysis. HC performed cell co-culture. YY, CZ, and XL wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Human umbilical cord collection for research was approved by the institutional review board of the School of Life Science and Biopharmacology of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University (Guangzhou, China). MSCs were isolated from umbilical cords with donor's informed consent.

Consent for publication

The patients consented to the publication of this data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Wang W, Zhang L, Liu L, Zheng Y, Zhang Y, Yang S, Shi R and Wang S: Chemosensitizing effect of shRNA-mediated ERCC1 silencing on a Xuanwei lung adenocarcinoma cell line and its clinical significance. Oncol Rep. 37:1989–1997. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Rojas A, Zhang P, Wang Y, Foo WC, Muñoz NM, Xiao L, Wang J, Gores GJ, Hung MC and Blechacz B: A positive TGF-β/c-KIT feedback loop drives tumor progression in advanced primary liver cancer. Neoplasia. 18:371–386. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Baskar R, Yap SP, Chua KL and Itahana K: The diverse and complex roles of radiation on cancer treatment: Therapeutic target and genome maintenance. Am J Cancer Res. 2:372–382. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Lee DH, Ahn Y, Kim SU, Wang KC, Cho BK, Phi JH, Park IH, Black PM, Carroll RS, Lee J and Kim SK: Targeting rat brainstem glioma using human neural stem cells and human mesenchymal stem cells. Clin Cancer Res. 15:4925–4934. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Ciavarella S, Dominici M, Dammacco F and Silvestris F: Mesenchymal stem cells: A new promise in anticancer therapy. Stem Cells Dev. 20:1–10. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Yang J, Miao Y, Chang Y, Zhang F, Wang Y and Zheng S: Condition medium of HepG-2 cells induces the transdifferentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells into cancerous mesenchymal stem cells. Am J Transl Res. 8:3429–3438. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Liao W, Zhong J, Yu J, Xie J, Liu Y, Du L, Yang S, Liu P, Xu J, Wang J, et al: Therapeutic benefit of human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stromal cells in intracerebral hemorrhage rat: Implications of anti-inflammation and angiogenesis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 24:307–316. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Zhong YS, Lin N, Deng MH, Zhang FC, Tang ZF and Xu RY: Deficient proliferation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in patients with chronic hepatitis B viral infections and cirrhosis of the liver. Dig Dis Sci. 55:438–445. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Bieback K, Kem S, Kluter H and Eichler H: Critical parameters for the isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells. 22:625–634. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Shen CJ, Chan TF, Chen CC, Hsu YC, Long CY and Lai CS: Human umbilical cord matrix-derived stem cells expressing interferon-β gene inhibit breast cancer cells via apoptosis. Oncotarget. 7:34172–34179. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Ma S, Liang S, Jiao H, Chi L, Shi X, Tian Y, Yang B and Guan F: Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells inhibit C6 glioma growth via secretion of dickkopf-1 (DKK1). Mol Cell Biochem. 385:277–286. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Yang C, Lei D, Ouyang W, Ren J, Li H, Hu J and Huang S: Conditioned media from human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells efficiently induced the apoptosis and differentiation in human glioma cell lines in vitro. Biomed Res Int. 2014:1093892014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Wang M, Cai J, Huang F, Zhu M, Zhang Q, Yang T, Zhang X, Qian H and Xu W: Pre-treatment of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells with interleukin-6 abolishes their growth-promoting effect on gastric cancer cells. Int J Mol Med. 35:367–375. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Yang X, Li Z, Ma Y, Gao J, Liu S, Gao Y and Wang G: Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells promote carcinoma growth and lymph node metastasis when co-injected with esophageal carcinoma cells in nude mice. Cancer Cell Int. 14:932014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Yuan Y, Lu X, Chen X, Shao H and Huang S: Jagged1 contributes to the drug resistance of Jurkat cells in contact with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Oncol Lett. 6:1000–1006. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Qiao L, Xu ZL, Zhao TJ, Ye LH and Zhang XD: Dkk-1 secreted by mesenchymal stem cells inhibits growth of breast cancer cells via depression of Wnt signalling. Cancer Lett. 269:67–77. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Ba Q, Li J, Huang C, Qiu H, Li J, Chu R, Zhang W, Xie D, Wu Y and Wang H: Effects of benzo [a]pyrene exposure on human hepatocellular carcinoma cell angiogenesis, metastasis and NF-κB signaling. Environ Health Perspect. 123:246–254. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Tian LL, Yue W, Zhu F, Li S and Li W: Human mesenchymal stem cells play a dual role on tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Physiol. 226:1860–1867. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Wei HJ, Nickoloff JA, Chen WH, Liu HY, Lo WC, Chang YT, Yang PC, Wu CW, Williams DF, Gelovani JG and Deng WP: FOXF1 mediates mesenchymal stem cell fusion-induced reprogramming of lung cancer cells. Oncotarget. 5:9514–9529. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Wang Y, Fan H, Zhou B, Ju Z, Yu L, Guo L, Han J and Lu S: Fusion of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells with esophageal carcinoma cells inhibits the tumorigenicity of esophageal carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 40:370–377. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Di GH, Jiang S, Li FQ, Sun JZ, Wu CT, Hu X and Duan HF: Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells mitigate chemotherapy-associated tissue injury in a pre-clinical mouse model. Cytotherapy. 14:412–422. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Zhang C, Yang SJ, Wen Q, Zhong JF, Chen XL, Stucky A, Press MF and Zhang X: Human-derived normal mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in anticancer therapies. J Cancer. 8:85–96. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Ma Y, Hao X, Zhang S and Zhang J: The in vitro and in vivo effects of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells on the growth of breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 133:473–485. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Zhang Y, Wang J, Ren M, Li M, Chen D, Chen J, Shi F, Wang X and Dou J: Gene therapy of ovarian cancer using IL-21-secreting human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in nude mice. J Ovarian Res. 7:82014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Subramanian A, Shu-Uin G, Kae-Siang N, Gauthaman K, Biswas A, Choolani M, Bongso A and Chui-Yee F: Human umbilical cord wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells do not transform to tumor-associated fibroblasts in the presence of breast and ovarian cancer cells unlike bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 113:1886–1895. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Cohen GM: Caspases: The executioners of apoptosis. Biochem J. 326:1–16. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Ghoshal A and Ghosh SS: Antagonizing canonical Wnt signaling pathway by recombinant human sFRP4 purified from E. coli and its implications in cancer therapy. Mol Cell Biochem. 418:119–135. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Wei Y, Shen N, Wang Z, Yang G, Yi B, Yang N, Qiu Y and Lu J: Sorafenib sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cell to cisplatin via suppression of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Mol Cell Biochem. 381:139–144. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Baek SH, Kioussi C, Briata P, Wang D, Nguyen HD, Ohgi KA, Glass CK, Wynshaw-Boris A, Rose DW and Rosenfeld MG: Regulated subset of G1 growth-control genes in response to derepression by the Wnt pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:3245–3250. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Liu J, Han G, Liu H and Qin C: Suppression of cholangiocarcinoma cell growth by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: A possible role of Wnt and Akt signaling. PLoS One. 8:e628442013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Caplan AI and Correa D: The MSC: An injury drugstore. Cell Stem Cell. 9:11–15. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Aguirre-Ghiso JA: Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy. Nat Rev Cancer. 7:834–846. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Barkan D, El Touny LH, Michalowski AM, Smith JA, Chu I, Davis AS, Webster JD, Hoover S, Simpson RM, Gauldie J and Green JE: Metastatic growth from dormant cells induced by a col-I-enriched fibrotic environment. Cancer Res. 70:5706–5716. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Almog N, Ma L, Raychowdhury R, Schwager C, Erber R, Short S, Hlatky L, Vajkoczy P, Huber PE, Folkman J and Abdollahi A: Transcriptional switch of dormant tumors to fast-growing angiogenic phenotype. Cancer Res. 69:836–844. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Glick AB and Yuspa SH: Tissue homeostasis and the control of the neoplastic phenotype in epithelial cancers. Semin Cancer Biol. 15:75–83. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Alt-Holland A, Zhang W, Margulis A and Garlick JA: Microenvironmental control of premalignant disease: The role of intercellular adhesion in the progression of squamous cell carcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol. 15:84–96. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

David DM and Goodridge HS: Information processing during phagocytosis. Nat Rev Immuno. 12:492–502. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Lavoie JR and Rosu-Myles M: Uncovering the secretes of mesenchymal stem cells. Biochimie. 95:2212–2221. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Jacobsen BM, Harrell JC, Jedlicka P, Borges VF, Varella-Garcia M and Horwitz KB: Spontaneous fusion with and transformation of mouse stroma by, malignant human breast cancer epithelium. Cancer Res. 66:8274–8279. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Mortensen K, Lichtenberg J, Thomsen PD and Larsson LI: Spontaneous fusion between cancer cells and endothelial cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 61:2125–2131. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2018
Volume 15 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yuan Y, Zhou C, Chen X, Tao C, Cheng H and Lu X: Suppression of tumor cell proliferation and migration by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: A possible role for apoptosis and Wnt signaling. Oncol Lett 15: 8536-8544, 2018.
APA
Yuan, Y., Zhou, C., Chen, X., Tao, C., Cheng, H., & Lu, X. (2018). Suppression of tumor cell proliferation and migration by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: A possible role for apoptosis and Wnt signaling. Oncology Letters, 15, 8536-8544. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8368
MLA
Yuan, Y., Zhou, C., Chen, X., Tao, C., Cheng, H., Lu, X."Suppression of tumor cell proliferation and migration by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: A possible role for apoptosis and Wnt signaling". Oncology Letters 15.6 (2018): 8536-8544.
Chicago
Yuan, Y., Zhou, C., Chen, X., Tao, C., Cheng, H., Lu, X."Suppression of tumor cell proliferation and migration by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: A possible role for apoptosis and Wnt signaling". Oncology Letters 15, no. 6 (2018): 8536-8544. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8368