MicroRNA‑28‑5p inhibits the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells by suppressing AKT phosphorylation
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 27, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8603
- Pages: 9777-9785
-
Copyright: © Xiao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Gastric cancer is one of the malignant tumor with the highest mortality rates worldwide (1). Although the incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer have declined globally, it remains the second most common cause of cancer-associated mortality (2). A total of >70% of cases occur in developing countries and half of cases occur in Eastern Asia, primarily in China (3,4). Invasion and metastasis are the primary reasons that lead to gastric cancer-associated mortalities. Investigating molecular mechanisms of invasion and metastasis is of great value for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of gastric cancer. In the past several decades, a number of molecular mechanisms have been investigated, but the role of microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) in gastric cancer remains to be elucidated.
miRNAs are non-coding RNA molecules containing ~20 nucleotides in length that are major post-transcriptional regulators. miRNAs regulate numerous cellular processes, including cellular proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, invasion and metastasis (5). miRNAs may undergo aberrant regulation during carcinogenesis and serve as oncogenes or tumor suppressors (6). Aberrant expression of miRNAs is common in various human malignancies and may modulate cancer-associated genomic regions or fragile sites (7). miR-28 is an important miRNA, including miR-28-5p and miR-28-3p. A large body of evidence indicates that the abnormality of miR-28 expression is associated with carcinogenesis of breast cancer (8), colorectal cancer (9), B-cell lymphoma (10), glioma and renal cell carcinoma (11). However, studies concerning the role of miR-28-5p in human gastric cancer remain to be performed.
The present study profiled the expression of miR-28-5p in 91 gastric cancer tissue and adjacent normal mucosal tissue pairs by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). In addition, gastric cancer BGC823 and SGC7901 cells were infected with miR-28-5p mimics to evaluate the role of mir-28-5p in gastric cancer. Low-expression of miR-28-5p in gastric cancer tissues with poor prognosis was identified, and miR-28-5p was demonstrated to serve a role in inhibiting gastric cancer migration and invasion. These results indicate that miR-28-5p may be a potential biomarker and therapeutic target against gastric cancer.
Materials and methods
Clinical samples
Fresh samples of 91 pairs of gastric cancer and adjacent normal mucosal tissues farthest from the tumor (>5 cm) were obtained from patients who underwent surgical resection for gastric cancer diagnosed based on the 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system (12) in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (Shenyang, China) between March 2007 and November 2008. The aforementioned samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80°C instantly until they were experimentally utilized. The present study was approved by the Medical Ethics and Human Clinical Trial Committee at the First Hospital of China Medical University and each patient provided written informed consent for their inclusion in the present study.
Cell culture
Human gastric cancer BGC823 and SGC7901 cell lines obtained from the Department of Cell Biology, China Medical University were incubated in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2, and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). DMEM was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 U/ml streptomycin according to the supplier's protocol.
Construction of stable cell lines
To construct a stable miR-28-5p-overexpressing cell line, BGC823 and SGC7901 cells in the logarithmic growth phase in 6-well plates were infected with 50 µl (1×108 TU/ml) commercial lentiviral packaged pre-miR-28 and the control lentivirus (Shanghai GeneChem Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The negative control short hairpin RNA sequence was 5′-TTCTCCGAACGTGUCACGT-3′. After 24 h, DMEM containing puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to culture and select stable cell lines for two weeks prior to subsequent phenotypic and functional analyses.
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from frozen tissue samples with TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Next, miRNA was purified with the mirVana miRNA Isolation kit (Ambion; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's manual. cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScript™ RT Reagent kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). qPCR was performed as previously described (13) to detect the expression level of miR-28-5p in the 91 pairs of human gastric and adjacent normal mucosal tissue samples. The expression of miRNAs was calculated relative to U6 small nuclear RNA. All the quantitation of PCR data was presented as fold-change and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (14). Primers used were as follows: miR-28-5p reverse transcription primer, 5′-CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGCTCAATAG-3′; miR-28-5p forward primer, 5′-GCGGAAGGAGCTCACAGTCT-3′; miR-28-5p reverse primer, 5′-TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG-3′; U6 forward primer, 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′; U6 reverse primer, 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′.
MTT assay
The proliferative rates were assessed by MTT assay. The stable infected cells and control cells were inoculated in 96-well plates at a density of 2×103 cells/well and cultured for 1–6 days. At 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 144 h, 20 µl MTT (10 mg/ml) was added to cells and they were incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Next, dimethyl sulfoxide was added to solubilize the formazan product for 20 min at room temperature. The absorbance was determined at 490 nm with a spectrophotometer. All experiments were performed three times in triplicate.
Cell cycle analysis
BGC823 and SGC7901 cells (5×105) were cultured for 48 h in 6-well plates, and then digested, washed with cold PBS and fixed in 100% precooled methanol overnight at 4°C. Cells were washed with cold PBS again, re-suspended in PBS solution containing 100 µg/ml propidium iodide and 20 µg/ml RNase A (Omega Bio-Tek, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA), and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Next, the cells were measured using a flow cytometer and analyzed with FACSCalibur™ (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and FlowJo software (version 7.6.1; Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
Adhesion assay
BGC823 and SGC7901 cells were seeded on 24-well plates at equal numbers (~2×104), incubated for 20 min and washed three times with PBS to remove the non-adherent cells. Next, cells were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, and stained with 0.4% Trypan Blue for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were then counted under a light microscope in 20 independent symmetrical visual fields at a magnification of ×400.
Wound scratch assay
Equal numbers (~2×105) of stably infected cells and control cells were incubated in 6-well plates equal numbers for 24 h until they reached 90–100% confluence. The capacity of movement on cells was detected by wound-healing assay. Briefly, a scratch was made across the center of the cell monolayer in each well using sterile 200-µl pipette tip and the medium was replaced with fresh medium. The scratch distance between the two linear regions was imaged and measured at different time points using an inverted microscope.
Transwell assay
For the cell migration assay, ~1×105 cells were harvested, re-suspended in serum-free DMEM, and added to the top chamber of 24-well Transwell chambers (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) with a pore size of 8.0 µm; the lower chamber was filled with 500 µl DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were fixed with 100% precooled methanol for 10 min and stained with 0.4% Trypan Blue following incubation at 37°C for 24 h. Cells on the top chambers were removed by a cotton swab. The number of cells that invaded to the bottom surface was counted using a light microscope. The invasion assay was performed as migration assay, with the exception that the cells were seeded onto the filters of the Transwell chambers with coated Matrigel.
Protein extraction and western blot analysis
Total protein was extracted from cells using ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer supplemented with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). ABCA kit with Varioskan multimode microplates spectrophotometer from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA) was used to detect the concentration of protein in the supernatant. A total of 20 µg protein/well was fractionated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Membranes were blocked at room temperature for 2 h with 5% non-fat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) and incubated with P-ERK (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology; cat. no. 9101), P-Pak1 (1:1,000; Thermo Fisher Scientific; cat. no. PA5-37677), P-Pak4 (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology; cat. no. 3241) and P-AKT (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology; cat. no. 4060) at 4°C overnight. The membranes were washed in TBST and incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (Goat anti-rabbit, 1:5,000; ZSGQ-BIO; cat. no. ZF-0311) for 2 h at room temperature. Bound antibody complexes were detected and visualized by ECL western bolting detection kit (Ambion; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
Independent verified data set from the NCBI-Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database
The GSE39845 dataset was downloaded from the GEO database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, accessed on December 10th 2015). The GSE39845 contained six colorectal cancer samples (three normal vs. three cancer samples). The platform was based on the GPL14613 (miRNA-2) Affymetrix Multispecies miRNA-2 Array. Then, the preprocessing of Microarray Data was conducted by Affy package in R software (R software, version 3.2.1; Affy package, version 1.56.0; http://www.r-project.org/, accessed on December 5th 2015), and differentially expressed miRNA was identified by the limma package in R software (limma package, version 3.34.6). Only the differentially expressed miRNA with P<0.05 and |log2 (fold-change)|>1.5 were screened out, as calculated by Student's t-test. To additionally visualize differentially expressed miRNA, the heatmap was constructed using the Pheatmap package in R (Pheatmap package, version 1.0.8; http://www.r-project.org/).
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables for the summary statistics of the study are presented as mean ± standard deviation, or as median value with interquartile ranges. The experimental data were analyzed by SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant when P<0.05. Mann-Whitney test (for two groups) or Kruskal-Wallis test (for >2 groups) were used to analyze the association between the expression of miR-28-5p and clinicopathological features in patients with gastric cancer. Survival curves were produced using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to analyze survival difference. Student's t-test was used to analyze other parameters of phenotypes of gastric cancer cells.
Results
Clinical significance of miR-28-5p in gastric cancer tissues
Previous reports have identified that the expression of miR-28-5p was abnormal in various tumors (9,15–19). The present study used RT-qPCR to detect the expression level of miR-28-5p in 91 gastric cancer tissues and corresponding non-tumor adjacent tissues. As presented in Fig. 1A, the expression level of miR-28-5p was reduced significantly in gastric cancer tissues compared with corresponding non-tumor adjacent tissues (P<0.01). The association between the expression of miR-28-5p and the clinicopathological factors of gastric cancer was further analyzed (Table I). No statistical difference between miR-28-5p expression, and age, gender, location, grosstype, size, histological type and lymphatic invasion was identified. The expression level of mir-28-5p in gastric cancer tissues from patients with TNM stage IIIC and stage IV disease was significantly lower compared with that in gastric cancer tissues from patients with TNM stage I, II, IIIA, and IIIB disease (P=0.030). The miR-28-5p level was significantly reduced in the T4 group compared with that in T1, T2 and T3 groups (P=0.024). In addition, a significantly lower expression level of miR-28-5p was observed in gastric cancer tissues from patients with N3 lymph node status compared with that in gastric cancer tissues from patients with N0, N1 and N2 lymph node status (P=0.035). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis illustrated that the overall survival time was significantly longer in patients with higher miR-28-5p expression, compared with patients with lower miR-28-5p expression (P=0.041; Fig. 1B). The dividing standard was that if the median value was >0.73-fold, the patients were in the higher miR-28-5p expression group, whereas if the median value was ≤0.73-fold, the patients were in the lower miR-28-5p expression group. Based on the Limma package, the published expression dataset GSE39845 of the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database was analyzed and the differentially expressed miRNAs between colorectal cancer and paired normal tissues were obtained. The results of the analysis indicated that miR-28-5p expression was downregulated in colorectal cancer tissues (P<0.001), which demonstrated that the expression of miR-28-5p was markedly reduced in colorectal tumors, compared with corresponding normal tissues (Fig. 1C).
Table I.Association between the expression of miR-28-5p with clinicopathological features in patients with gastric cancer. |
miR-28-5p inhibits the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells
To investigate the functional significance of miR-28-5p overexpression in gastric cancer, miR-28-5p-lentivirus infection was used to establish stable BGC823 and SGC7901 cell lines overexpressing miR-28-5p. Fig. 2A demonstrated that expression of miR-28-5p was significantly increased in BGC823 and SGC7901 cell lines following infection with miR-28-5p-lentivirus. To characterize the functionofmiR-28-5pin gastric cancer progression, the effect of miR-28-5p expression on the proliferation of gastric cancer cells was detected using an MTT assay and flow cytometry analysis. No statistically significant difference was identified in the proliferative ability of cells overexpressing miR-28-5p compared with the control cells (Fig. 2B). Similarly, cell cycle analysis also revealed that there were no significant differences between the cells overexpressing miR-28-5p and control cells (Fig. 2C and D). A cell adhesion assay was performed to assess whether miR-28-5p expression affected cell adhesion capability of gastric cancer cells, and revealed that upregulation of miR-28-5p exhibited no effect on cell adhesion (Fig. 3A). Wound-scratch and cell migration assays were performed to evaluate whether miR-28-5p was able to affect the migration of gastric cancer cells. Fig. 3B and C revealed that there was a significant inhibition in migration in cells infected with miR-28-5p mimics compared with cells infected with negative control. In Fig. 3C, an invasion assay revealed miR-28-5p inhibited the invasion ability of gastric cancer cells.
Overexpressing miR-28-5p inhibits the phosphorylation of RAC serine/threonine-protein kinase (AKT) in gastric cancer cells
Previous studies have validated thatP21-activated kinase-1 (Pak1) (20), P21-activated kinase-4 (Pak4) (21), extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK) (22) and AKT (23) are involved in invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer. Western blotting detected the phosphorylation level of Pak1, Pak4, ERK and AKT protein in BGC823, and SGC7901 cells overexpressing miR-28-5p. Only the phosphorylation level of AKT protein revealed a marked reduction in BGC823 and SGC7901 cells overexpressing miR-28-5p, compared with cells that were infected with negative control (Fig. 4). These results revealed that overexpression miR-28-5p inhibited the phosphorylation of AKT protein in gastric cancer cells.
Discussion
Gastric cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer-associated mortality in the world (24). A large proportion of gastric cancer patients, particularly in China, are diagnosed at advanced stage with metastasis, and therefore are unable to undergo curative resection (25,26). It has been documented that patients with advanced stage gastric cancer have a poor prognosis, with a reduced 5-year survival rate (27). Therefore, metastasis is a key event in determining the prognosis of gastric cancer. miRNAs possess essential roles in angiogenesis and cancer metastasis (28). The Snail-regulated miR-375 inhibited the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells partially by targeting Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) (29). Liu et al (30) reported that miR-10b promoted the invasion of gastric cells by activating RhoC-AKT signaling, through targeting homeobox protein Hox-D10. Mir-28-5p has been reported to be associated with development and progression of a number of tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer and renal cell carcinoma (9,17,31,32). However, the role of miR-28-5p in gastric cancer remains unknown. The present study revealed the significant downregulation of miR-28-5p in gastric cancer tissues. The overall survival time was significantly longer in patients with higher miR-28-5p expression compared with those with low expression. Detailed analysis of miR-28-5p expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer revealed significant association between the expression level of miR-28-5p, and depth of invasion, lymph node status and TNM stage. The data indicated that the expression of miR-28-5pwas clinically relevant and maybe a potent biomarker for the prognosis of gastric cancer.
The present study investigated the biological function of miR-28-5p in gastric cancer in vitro. MTT assay and flow cytometry analysis revealed that overexpression of miR-28-5p in human gastric cell line BGC823 and SGC7901 did not affect cellular proliferation, and cell cycle progression. To further characterize the role of miR-28-5p in invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer, cell adhesion, wound healing, migration, and invasion assays were performed. Overexpression of miR-28-5p inhibited the migratory and invasive ability of gastric cancer cells, but not the adhesion ability (Fig. 3). These data suggested that miR-28-5p might be a tumor suppressor gene, which inhibited the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer.
ERK, Pak1, Pak4 and AKT have been reported to be involved in the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer. ERK signaling pathway can be activated by transforming growth factor-β to regulate the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer (33). Pak1 activates ERK and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) to induce the metastasis of gastric cancer (34). Pak4 kinase mediates the phosphorylation of stathmin 2 to promote the invasive potential of gastric cancer cells (21). AKT has three isoforms, AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3, and serves an essential role in the regulation of diverse cellular functions, including cell growth, proliferation, glucose metabolism, survival, genome stability, transcription and neovascularization (35). AKT signaling regulates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, affecting the migration and invasion of circulating gastric cancer cells (36). Western blot analysis was used to profile the phosphorylation level of ERK, Pak1, Pak4 and AKT in BGC823, and SGC7901 cells overexpressing miR-28-5p. The results revealed that overexpression of miR-28-5p markedly inhibited the phosphorylation level of AKT, but not ERK, Pak1 and Pak4, in gastric cancer cells. Overexpression of miR-28-5p reduced the migratory and invasive capacity of gastric cancer cells, and the possible mechanism may involve the inhibition of the activation of the AKT signaling pathway via miR-28-5p.
In summary, to the best of our knowledge, the present study demonstrated that miR-28-5p expression was significantly downregulated in gastric cancer and associated with poor gastric cancer patient prognosis for the first time. miR-28-5p, as a tumor suppressor, inhibited gastric cancer cell invasion and metastasis by repressing the phosphorylation level of AKT. miR-28-5p may be a potential biomarker for prognosis of gastric cancer and a therapeutic target for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81001092) and Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning (grant no. 2013021097). The funding body had no role in the design the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
FX, ZC and FL conceived and designed the study. FX, ZC and HH performed the experiments. PW and BG performed the statistical and bioinformatics analyses. YX performed statistical analyses. FX and ZC wrote the manuscript. YX and FL revised the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Our study was approved by the Medical Ethics and Human Clinical Trial Committee at the First Hospital of China Medical University and the written informed consent of each patient included in our study was also provided.
Consent for publication
All patients have provided the written informed consent for the publication for the associated data.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Glossary
Abbreviations
Abbreviations:
RT-qPCR |
reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction |
miRNA/miR |
microRNA |
Pak1 |
p21-activated kinase-1 |
Pak4 |
p21-activated kinase-4 |
ERK |
extracellular-signal regulated kinase |
JAK |
Janus kinase |
JNK |
c-Jun N-terminal kinase |
References
Arnold M, Moore SP, Hassler S, Ellison-Loschmann L, Forman D and Bray F: The burden of stomach cancer in indigenous populations: A systematic review and global assessment. Gut. 63:64–71. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 127:2893–2917. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang L: Incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in China. World J Gastroenterol. 12:17–20. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fock KM and Ang TL: Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer in Asia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 25:479–486. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao X, Li X and Yuan H: microRNAs in gastric cancer invasion and metastasis. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 18:803–810. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ventura A and Jacks T: MicroRNAs and cancer: Short RNAs go a long way. Cell. 136:586–591. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wagner S, Ngezahayo A, Escobar Murua H and Nolte I: Role of miRNA let-7 and its major targets in prostate cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2014:3763262014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang M, Yao Y, Eades G, Zhang Y and Zhou Q: miR-28 regulates Nrf2 expression through a Keap1-independent mechanism. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 129:983–991. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Almeida MI, Nicoloso MS, Zeng L, Ivan C, Spizzo R, Gafà R, Xiao L, Zhang X, Vannini I, Fanini F, et al: Strand-specific miR-28-5p and miR-28-3p have distinct effects in colorectal cancer cells. Gastroenterology. 142(886–896): e92012. | |
Schneider C, Setty M, Holmes AB, Maute RL, Leslie CS, Mussolin L, Rosolen A, Dalla-Favera R and Basso K: MicroRNA 28 controls cell proliferation and is down-regulated in B-cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111:8185–8190. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Malzkorn B, Wolter M, Liesenberg F, Grzendowski M, Stühler K, Meyer HE and Reifenberger G: Identification and functional characterization of microRNAs involved in the malignant progression of gliomas. Brain Pathol. 20:539–550. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL and Trotti A: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th edition. Springer-Verlag; New York: pp. 347–377. 2010 | |
Cheng Z, Liu F, Wang G, Li Y, Zhang H and Li F: miR-133 is a key negative regulator of CDC42-PAK pathway in gastric cancer. Cell Signal. 26:2667–2673. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li Z, Gu X, Fang Y, Xiang J and Chen Z: microRNA expression profiles in human colorectal cancers with brain metastases. Oncol Lett. 3:346–350. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li LL, Qu LL, Fu HJ, Zheng XF, Tang CH, Li XY, Chen J, Wang WX, Yang SX, Wang L, et al: Circulating microRNAs as novel biomarkers of ALK-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer and predictors of response to crizotinib therapy. Oncotarget. 8:45399–45414. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou SL, Hu ZQ, Zhou ZJ, Dai Z, Wang Z, Cao Y, Fan J, Huang XW and Zhou J: miR-28-5p-IL-34-macrophage feedback loop modulates hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. Hepatology. 63:1560–1575. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lim EL, Trinh DL, Scott DW, Chu A, Krzywinski M, Zhao Y, Robertson AG, Mungall AJ, Schein J, Boyle M, et al: Comprehensive miRNA sequence analysis reveals survival differences in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. Genome Biol. 16:182015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rizzo M, Berti G, Russo F, Evangelista M, Pellegrini M and Rainaldi G: The miRNA pull out assay as a method to validate the miR-28-5p targets identified in other tumor contexts in prostate cancer. Int J Genomics. 2017:52148062017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang G, Zhang Q, Song Y, Wang X, Guo Q, Zhang J, Li J, Han Y, Miao Z and Li F: PAK1 regulates RUFY3-mediated gastric cancer cell migration and invasion. Cell Death Dis. 6:e16822015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guo Q, Su N, Zhang J, Li X, Miao Z, Wang G, Cheng M, Xu H, Cao L and Li F: PAK4 kinase-mediated SCG10 phosphorylation involved in gastric cancer metastasis. Oncogene. 33:3277–3287. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fukui H, Zhang X, Sun C, Hara K, Kikuchi S, Yamasaki T, Kondo T, Tomita T, Oshima T, Watari J, et al: IL-22 produced by cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes gastric cancer cell invasion via STAT3 and ERK signaling. Br J Cancer. 111:763–771. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sasaki T and Kuniyasu H: Significance of AKT in gastric cancer (Review). Int J Oncol. 45:2187–2192. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Danaei G, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, Murray CJ and Ezzati M: Comparative Risk Assessment collaborating group (Cancers): Causes of cancer in the world: Comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors. Lancet. 366:1784–1793. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shen L, Shan YS, Hu HM, Price TJ, Sirohi B, Yeh KH, Yang YH, Sano T, Yang HK, Zhang X, et al: Management of gastric cancer in Asia: Resource-stratified guidelines. Lancet Oncol. 14:e535–e547. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takahashi T, Saikawa Y and Kitagawa Y: Gastric cancer: Current status of diagnosis and treatment. Cancers (Basel). 5:48–63. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hochwald SN, Kim S, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF and Karpeh MS: Analysis of 154 actual five-year survivors of gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 4:520–525. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhong J, Chen Y and Wang LJ: Emerging molecular basis of hematogenous metastasis in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 22:2434–2440. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu Y, Jin J, Liu Y, Huang Z, Deng Y, You T, Zhou T, Si J and Zhuo W: Snail-regulated miR-375 inhibits migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells by targeting JAK2. PLoS One. 9:e995162014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Z, Zhu J, Cao H, Ren H and Fang X: miR-10b promotes cell invasion through RhoC-AKT signaling pathway by targeting HOXD10 in gastric cancer. Int J Oncol. 40:1553–1560. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Shi X and Teng F: Down-regulated miR-28-5p in human hepatocellular carcinoma correlated with tumor proliferation and migration by targeting insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Mol Cell Biochem. 408:283–293. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang C, Hu J, Lu M, Gu H, Zhou X, Chen X, Zen K, Zhang CY, Zhang T, Ge J, et al: A panel of five serum miRNAs as a potential diagnostic tool for early-stage renal cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 5:76102015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fu H, Hu Z, Wen J, Wang K and Liu Y: TGF-beta promotes invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells by increasing fascin1 expression via ERK and JNK signal pathways. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 41:648–656. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li LH, Luo Q, Zheng MH, Pan C, Wu GY, Lu YZ, Feng B, Chen XH and Liu BY: P21-activated protein kinase 1 is overexpressed in gastric cancer and induces cancer metastasis. Oncol Rep. 27:1435–1442. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bellacosa A, Kumar CC, Di Cristofano A and Testa JR: Activation of AKT kinases in cancer: Implications for therapeutic targeting. Adv Cancer Res. 94:29–86. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yuan D, Xia H, Zhang Y, Chen L, Leng W, Chen T, Chen Q, Tang Q, Mo X, Liu M and Bi F: P-Akt/miR-200 signaling regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration and invasion in circulating gastric tumor cells. Int J Oncol. 45:2430–2438. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |