Inhibiting the proliferation and metastasis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma cells by blocking the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor with small interfering RNA

  • Authors:
    • Ke Xiao
    • Zhengxiao Ouyang
    • Hui‑Huan Tang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 30, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8840
  • Pages: 1841-1848
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the proliferation and metastasis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma cells can be suppressed and whether apoptosis can be induced by small interfering RNA (siRNA) repression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). siRNA sequences targeting the VEGF gene were designed and the human hilar cholangiocarcinoma QBC939, HCCC‑9810 and RBE cell lines were transfected with VEGF‑siRNA plasmids for 48 h. Reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting measured the levels of VEGF‑A, VEGF‑C and matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) mRNA expression and protein content. The cell invasion potential was evaluated using the Transwell invasion and migration assay and the MTT assay was employed to detect the proliferation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma cells. Flow cytometry was used to quantify cell apoptosis and necrosis. Following the transfection of VEGF‑siRNA, a significant reduction of mRNA and protein levels of VEGF‑A, VEGF‑C and MMP2 was observed in the hilar cholangiocarcinoma cells. The invasion, migration and proliferation of tumor cells were also notably decreased. The rate of tumor cell apoptosis was increased in the VEGF‑siRNA group (15.42%) compared with the non‑siRNA control (2.22%) and the negative control (2.71%) groups. It was concluded that blocking the expression of VEGF via VEGF‑siRNA effectively inhibited the invasion, migration and proliferation, and induced apoptosis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma cells. These observations suggested that targeting VEGF with RNAi may be an effective therapeutic strategy for treating hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Introduction

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is a primary malignant tumor that originates from the biliary epithelium cholangiocytes and develops at the confluence of the right and left biliary ducts within the portal hepatic duct. HC was first described by Nicolas Klatskin in 1957, and has therefore been termed a ‘Klatskin tumor.’ These tumors account for 58–75% of all extrahepatic biliary carcinomas. Patients with Klatskin tumors that receive either conservative treatment or forego surgicalintervention have had a 5-year survival rate <5% over the past 50 years. Diagnosis and therapeutic efficacy have also not substantially improved due to the extremely aggressive nature of this neoplasm and its asymptomatic presentation during early stages of illness. Asymptomatic presentation and aggressive growth are associated with a poor prognosis during the advanced stages (1,2). In addition, over the last two decades, the incidence and mortality of hilar cholangiocarcinoma have been increasing worldwide and this has been more significant in the Far East than in the West (35).

Recent studies have suggested that neo-angiogenesis serves a key role in the growth and spreading of tumor mass, including in cholangiocarcinoma (68). Although numerous growth factors are involved, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been revealed to make an important contribution to the angiogenesis in a solid tumor and its metastasis (9,10). Our recent study demonstrated that expression of VEGF and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) was significantly higher in cholangiocarcinoma tissues than in normal bile duct tissues and para-neoplastic tissues (11). Among the VEGF family, VEGF-A has the largest effect in promoting angiogenesis, whereas VEGF-C has recently been revealed to induce angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis (12,13).

Recently, small interfering RNA (siRNA) has been revealed to inhibit the expression of a corresponding target gene in mammals through the biologically conserved mechanism of RNA interference (RNAi) (14,15). RNAi is a sequence-specific, post-transcriptional gene-silencing mechanism that allows for specific repression of target genes (1619). RNAi is now being exploited as a powerful tool for the analysis of gene function and demonstrates potential for therapeutic applications.

There have been a number of studies evaluating VEGF in the treatment of tumors, including gastrointestinal cancer, liver cancer, mammary cancer, prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer (2024). In addition to these studies, several anti-angiogenic drugs, including Bevacizumab and Celecoxib, have been developed and used in clinical practice (25,26). However, there have been no studies on VEGF in hilar cholangiocarcinomas. The aim of the present study was to identify an improved VEGF-specific RNAi for the preclinical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Cell lines used for experimentation were the normal human bile duct epithelial HIBEpiC cell line, in addition to the QBC939, HCCC-9810 and RBE cell lines, which are all poorly differentiated hilar cholangiocarcinoma cells originating from adenocarcinoma. The cell lines were obtained from Third Military Medical University(Chongqing, China), Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA), respectively. All cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and no antibiotics at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Streptomycin (100 µg/ml) and penicillin (100 U/ml) were later added to the medium.

The expression of VEGF in hilar cholangiocarcinoma lines

The mRNA expression of VEGF was detected by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). First, total RNA from each experimental group was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) followed by removal of DNA according to the manufacturer's protocols.

The reverse transcription was performed using 20-µl reactions of RevertAid™ M-MulV Reverse Transcriptase (Fermentas; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocols.

RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with an ABI Prism 7500 Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The amplification conditions were as follows: Denaturation for 10 sec at 95°C, 40 amplification cycles (95°C 5 sec, 60°C 20 sec), and generation of a dissociation curve (95°C 60 sec, 55°C 30 sec). The primer sequences were as follows: VEGF, 5′-TGCCCACTGAGGAGTCCAAC-3′; VEGF-A (226 bp) forward, 5′-CGTGTACGTTGGTGCCCGCT-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCCTTCCTCCTGCCCGGCTC-3′; VEGF-C (200 bp) forward, 5′-AGCCAATGTGGGGCCAACCG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGGCGGTTCGTACATGGCCG-3′; MMP2 (235 bp) forward, 5′-GGCAATGCAGTGGGGGCTTAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCTCTCCTTGGGGCAGCCATAGA-3′; and β-actin (208 bp) forward, 5′-ACAGAGCCTCGCCTTTGCCGATC-3′ and reverse, 5′-ATCCTTCTGACCCATGCCCACCA-3′. The expression of the target gene was measured using the 2−ΔΔCq method (27). Experiments were performed in triplicate.

The protein expression of VEGF was detected by western blotting. The primary antibodies used for western blotting were rabbit VEGF-A (catalog no., sc-152; dilution, 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), rabbit VEGF-C (catalog no., sc-25783; dilution, 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), and mouse MMP2 (catalog no., sc-13594; dilution, 1:300; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), respectively. A mouse GAPDH antibody (catalog no., Mab-2005079; dilution, 1:8,000; Promab Biotechnologies, Inc., Richmond, CA, USA) was used as an internal standard. The secondary antibody was goat anti rabbit IgG-HRP (catalog no., sc-2004; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), with dilution 1:10,000; 1:10,000; 1:20,000 and 1:80,000, respectively. All reagents were used according to the manufacturer's protocol.

The cell protein was obtained using the RIPA buffer (Promab Biotechnologies, Inc.) and quantified by the BCA method. Equal amounts of extracted protein were run on an SDS-PAGE gel (12%) and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed dry milk in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 2 h at 37°C, followed by incubation with the primary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. The membrane was rinsed four times with PBST and then incubated with secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. To remove the secondary antibody, the membrane was washed four times with PBST. The protein was detected with the SuperSignal protein detection kit (Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). These data were compared and analyzed by Gel-pro Analyzer 4.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA) and normalized to GAPDH. The whole experiment was performed in triplicate and results were represented as ratios of VEGF to GAPDH.

VEGF-siRNA preparation and transfection

Three VEGF specific siRNA fragments and one scrambled shRNA (negative control) were synthesized by Shanghai Gene Pharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer's protocols. The two complementary oligonucleotides of VEGF-siRNA were: siRNA1 forward, 5′-GGCCAGCACAUAGGAGAGATT-3′ and reverse, 5′-UCUCUCCUAUGUGCUGGCCTT-3′; siRNA2 forward, 5′-ACCTCACCAAGGCCAGCACTT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GTGCTGGCCTTGGTGAGGTTT-3′; siRNA3 forward, 5′-GTGGTGAAGTTCATGGATGTT-3′ and reverse, 5′-CATCCATGAACTTCACCACTT-3′; and scrambled shRNA forward, 5′-CACCGTTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGTCAAGAGATTACGTGACACGTTCGGAGAATTTTTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-GATCCAAAAAATTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGTAATCTCTTGACGTGACACGTTCGGAGAAC-3′. The reconstructed plasmids were verified by sequence analysis at Promab Biotechnologies, Inc. These constructs were named siRNA-VEGF-1, siRNA-VEGF-2, siRNA-VEGF-3 and siRNA-VEGF-NC, respectively.

QBC939, HCCC-9810 and RBE cell lines were transfected with siRNA-VEGF-1, siRNA-VEGF-2, siRNA-VEGF-3 and shRNA-VEGF-NC using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocols. In a word, cells were seeded in a six-well plate (Corning Incorporated, USA) at 50–60% confluence. After cultivation for 24 h, the cells were transfected with 100 nM siRNAs using Lipofectamine 2000. Fluorescence microscopy (at ×1,000 magnification) was used to monitor the transfection of each cell following a 6 h incubation. Following transfection for 48 h (37°C, 5% CO2), cells were harvested for additional experiments.

In vitro invasion assay

The invasion assay was performed using Transwell polycarbonate membranes inserted into 6-well plates (Costar; Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Briefly, Transwell filters were coated with Matrigel (3.9 µg/l, 60–80 µl; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lanes, NJ, USA) on the upper surface of the polycarbonate membrane inserts (pore size, 8 µm). Following incubation at 37°C for 30 min, the Matrigel became solidified and served as the extracellular matrix for cell invasion analysis. A total of 2 ml cells (containing 5×104 cells) suspension was added to the upper compartment and 1 ml DMEM + fetal calf serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was added to the lower compartment. After 36 h of incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2, the cells were allowed to migrate from the Matrigel into the pores of the filters. The membranes were excised from the insert and the cells on the upper surface of the membrane were removed with a cotton bud. The inserts were then fixed in 95% alcohol for 20 min at room temperature and stained with toluidine blue for 5 min at room temperature.

The number of migrated cells was counted using five randomly selected visual fields from the central and peripheral portion of the filters by an inverted microscope at high-power magnification (4×10×25). Each experiment was repeated three times.

MTT assay for proliferation detection

Cell proliferation was measured using the MTT Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Detection kit (Nanjing Keygen Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), according to the manufacturer's protocols. Briefly, all groups of cells were placed in 96-well plates (Costar; Corning Incorporated) at a density of 1×104 cells/well in a humidified atmosphere (37°C, 5% CO2). After a 24-h incubation, 10 µl MTT labeling reagent was added (final concentration, 0.5 mg/ml) to each well and incubated again at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 4 h. Subsequently, 50 µl 1X MTT was added to each well, followed by incubation at 37°C for 4 h. After the medium containing MTT was absorbed, the purple formazan crystals were dissolved in 150 µl dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The absorbance of each well was measured on a microtiter plate reader at a wavelength of 570 nm. Each experiment was repeated three times.

Apoptosis assay

An Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) kit (catalog no., A0001a; Adlitteram Diagnostic Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA) was used with a FACSAria™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Briefly, the harvested cells were washed with PBS at 4°C and centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min at 4°C, prior to 100 µl Annexin V labeling reagent being added (10 µl 10X binding buffer, 5 µl Annexin V-FITC, 85 µl distilled water), followed by a 15-min incubation in the dark. Following the incubation, 10 µl PI and 400 µl cold 1X binding buffer were added to each well to dilute the cell suspension. Finally, cell apoptosis was measured using a flow cytometer (FACSAriaTM, CellQuestPro, BD Biosciences). This experiment was repeated three times.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls method, or two-tailed Student's t-tests. SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Statistically significant differences are annotated as *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001.

Results

Expression of VEGF in hilar cholangiocarcinoma lines

The mRNA expression of VEGF in the QBC939 group was higher than that in the RBE group and HCCC-9801 groups (16.62 vs. 15.35 and 6.21; P <0.001). The same result was also observed at the protein level (Fig. 1). Therefore, the QBC939 cell line was used for further experiments.

Inhibition ratios of mRNA and protein levels

RT-qPCR and western blotting revealed that in the QBC939, HCCC-9810 and RBE cell lines, the expression of VEGF at the mRNA and protein levels in the siRNA-VEGF-1 groups was significantly reduced. The inhibition ratios of mRNA levels in the three cell lines were as follows: siRNA-VEGF-1 (92.21, 93.04 and 88.12%), siRNA-VEGF-2 (75.66, 72.31 and 71.67%) and siRNA-VEGF-3 (61.79, 64.05 and 62.98%). The inhibition ratios of protein levels in the three cell lines were as follows: siRNA-VEGF-1 (86.43, 83.02 and 85.62%), siRNA-VEGF-2 (72.43, 71.55 and 71.24%) and siRNA-VEGF-3 (63.59, 60.37 and 61.93%). siRNA-VEGF-1 was the most effective at inhibiting VEGF expression (P<0.05, Fig. 2), with no significant differences between the three cell lines being observed (P>0.05). According to these results, the QBC939 cell line and siRNA-VEGF-1 were selected for further study. The experimental design used siRNA-VEGF-1 and shRNA-VEGF-NC as the treatment and negative control (NC) groups, respectively, whereas cells in the blank control (BC) group were not treated with any siRNA.

Downregulation of VEGF-A, VEGF-C and MMP-2 mRNA expression by siRNA in QBC939 cells

The VEGF-siRNA-1 and scrambled shRNA were transiently transfected into QBC939 cells for 48 h. The transfection rates in the VEGF-siRNA-1 and siRNA-VEGF-NC groups were ~80% (Fig. 3A-D). After the cells had been passaged once, the transfection rates remained unchanged.

As demonstrated in Fig. 4, a significant reduction in VEGF-A, VEGF-C and MMP-2 mRNA expression was observed in the VEGF-siRNA-1 group compared with the two control groups 48 h post-transfection. The VEGF-A mRNA levels in the BC, NC and VEGF-siRNA-1 group were 11.21±2.89, 9.18±1.78 and 1.44±0.62, respectively. The inhibition ratio was 87.12% by VEGF-siRNA-1 (P<0.01), while the NC group had no significant difference in expression of VEGF-A mRNA in QBC939 cells (P>0.05). Similar outcomes were observed in VEGF-C and MMP-2 mRNA expression, with inhibition ratios of 81.98 and 71.62%, respectively.

Downregulation of VEGF-A, VEGF-C and MMP-2 protein levels in QBC939 cells

Levels of the target proteins and GAPDH were analyzed by western blotting, and images were captured using a digital video camera (Fig. 5A). The protein levels of VEGF-A, VEGF-C and MMP-2 were significantly downregulated following siRNA treatment. The inhibition ratio of the proteins varied among the three groups, with ratios of: 80.85% for VEGF-A, 77.96% for VEGF-C and 80.25% for MMP-2. The differences were significantly greater in the VEGF-siRNA-1 group than in the two control groups (P<0.01); however, there was no significant difference between the BC and NC groups (P>0.05, Fig. 5B).

Reduced invasion of QBC939 cells

As shown in Fig. 6, for each 1000× field under the inverted microscope, the number of migrated cells in the VEGF-siRNA group was 20.8±2.39, significantly lower than that of the BC group (37.2±4.32) and the NC group (32.8±3.56, P<0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference between the two control groups (P>0.05).

Reduced proliferation of QBC939 cells

As demonstrated in Fig. 7, the survival rate of the QBC939 cells was measured by the MTT assay in the VEGF-siRNA-1 group and the NC group. Cell proliferation was significantly reduced in VEGF-siRNA-1-transfected cells (0.302±0.004) compared with the blank (0.466±0.0045) and negative control groups (0.455±0.0026). The survival rate in the VEGF-siRNA-1 group was 64.3%, significantly lower than that of the BC group (100%) and the NC group (97.5%; P<0.01). There was no difference between the BC and NC groups (P>0.05).

Induction of apoptosis by VEGF-siRNA in QBC939 cells

Significant apoptosis was observed in the VEGF-siRNA group compared with that in the two control groups. In the VEGF-siRNA-1 group, the rate of apoptosis of QBC939 cells reached 15.42%, significantly higher than that of the BC group (2.22%) and the NC group (2.71%, P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two controls (P>0.05; Fig. 8).

Discussion

The majority of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma are diagnosed in the late stage of disease and have little chance to undergo surgery, resulting in a poor prognosis (28). Advances in interventional radiology and endoscopy have enabled non-surgical palliation of this disease; however, the effects are limited (9,29). The majority of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma are treated with conventional chemotherapy as the primary treatment of choice. In such clinical settings, an aggressive regimen of chemotherapy may not only fail to improve survival but may also harm the quality of life (28).

These clinical realities provide a strong rationale for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. RNAi techniques have made remarkable progress in in vitro studies over the last decade, in 2002, McCaffrey et al (30) published the first in vivo study for gene silencing by siRNA using mouse models. Subsequently, other studies have demonstrated that highly specific siRNAs have significant effects on the treatment of certain malignant tumors, including gastrointestinal cancer, liver cancer, mammary cancer, prostatic cancer and pancreatic cancer (3134). The success of those experiments using RNAi gene-silencing techniques caused widespread interest for the development of RNAi-based therapeutics. In light of these unmet clinical requirements, the present study aimed to identify a novel approach to more effectively treat hilar cholangiocarcinomas.

According to the results of the present study, siRNA sequences targeting the VEGF gene were successfully designed and synthesized and siRNA can effectively silence VEGF expression. When VEGF is blocked, VEGF-A, VEGF-C and MMP2 expression at the mRNA and protein levels is inhibited in the QBC939 cell line. There have been a series of studies (3537) that have established the key role that VEGF serves in the angiogenesis and metastasis of tumors. This function is mediated by members of the VEGF signaling family, including VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D and VEGF-E, as well as the VEGF receptors VEGFR-1 to VEGFR-3 (10,35,37).

In addition, the results of the present study using Transwell and MTT assays revealed that the invasion, migration and proliferation of these tumor cells can be suppressed following VEGF silencing. Results from the apoptosis assay also revealed that the rate of apoptosis was increased in the VEGF-siRNA-1 group. These results can be explained by the combined functions of VEGF-A, VEGF-C and MMP2. VEGF-A is believed to stimulate angiogenesis by activating endothelial cell proliferation via the intracellular tyrosine phosphorylation pathway through a paracrine or autocrine mechanism. In addition, VEGF-A acts as a major anti-apoptotic factor for endothelial cells observed in immature, newly formed blood vessels (3840). Therefore, blocking VEGF-A expression should effectively suppress intra-tumoral angiogenesis, vascular permeability and tumor growth. VEGF-C is regarded as a crucial factor for regulating lymphogenesis, acting via VEGFR-3. Certain studies have also demonstrated that there is a correlation between tumor VEGF-C expression and lymph node metastasis (4143). This suggested that blocking the expression of VEGF-C in the tumor cells can relieve lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis. MMP2 acts as a gelatinase, which is a major factor for homeostatic regulation of the extracellular environment. MMP2 can promote cancer progression, as well as allow cancer cell invasion, migration and metastasis by degrading the extracellular matrix and regulating the function of bioactive molecules by proteolytic processing (4446).

In summary, VEGF-A, VEGF-C and MMP2 serve key roles in the angiogenesis, proliferation and metastasis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. These observations suggested that an RNAi approach targeting VEGF maybe an effective therapeutic strategy for treating hilar cholangiocarcinoma. In addition, detection of the serum levels of VEGF-A, VEGF-C and MMP2 may be a useful and significant prognostic indicator, although this possibility requires substantial future research. Furthermore, one limitation of the present study is that it only incorporated a single cell line. Future studies should include two or three different cell lines in order to further verify the conclusions of the present study.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation for Youths (grant no. 81702670).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

KX and HHT conceived and designed the study. KX and ZO performed the experiments. KX wrote the paper. HHT analyzed the data, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics statement and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Blechacz B and Gores GJ: Cholangiocarcinoma: Advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology. 48:308–321. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Ito F, Cho CS, Rikkers LF and Weber SM: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Current management. Ann Surg. 250:210–218. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Blendis L and Halpern Z: An increasing incidence of cholangiocarcinoma: Why? Gastroenterology. 127:1008–1009. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Shin HR, Oh JK, Masuyer E, Curado MP, Bouvard V, Fang YY, Wiangnon S, Sripa B and Hong ST: Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma: An update focusing on risk factors. Cancer Sci. 101:579–585. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Feige JJ: Tumor angiogenesis: Recent progress and remaining challenges. Bull Cancer. 97:1305–1310. 2010.(In French). PubMed/NCBI

7 

Tang D, Nagano H, Yamamoto H, Wada H, Nakamura M, Kondo M, Ota H, Yoshioka S, Kato H, Damdinsuren B, et al: Angiogenesis in cholangiocellular carcinoma: Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, angiopoietin-1/2, thrombospondin-1 and clinicopathological significance. Oncol Rep. 15:525–532. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Thelen A, Scholz A, Weichert W, Wiedenmann B, Neuhaus P, Gessner R, Benckert C and Jonas S: Tumor-associated angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis correlate with progression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 105:1123–1132. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Halper J: Growth factors as active participants in carcinogenesis: A perspective. Vet Pathol. 47:77–97. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Appelmann I, Liersch R, Kessler T, Mesters RM and Berdel WE: Angiogenesis inhibition in cancer therapy: Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and their receptors: Biological functions and role in malignancy. Recent Results Cancer Res. 180:51–81. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Zhou J and Tang HH: Significance and expression of microvessel density, vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinases 2 in cholangiocarcinoma. Chin J Gen Surg. 12:122–124. 2003.(In Chinese).

12 

Das S, Ladell DS, Podgrabinska S, Ponomarev V, Nagi C, Fallon JT and Skobe M: Vascular endothelial growth factor-C induces lymphangitic carcinomatosis, an extremely aggressive form of lung metastases. Cancer Res. 70:1814–1824. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Achen MG and Stacker SA: Molecular control of lymphatic metastasis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1131:225–234. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Vázquez-Vega S, Contreras-Paredes A, Lizano-Soberón M, Amador-Molina A, García-Carrancá A, Sánchez-Suárez LP and Benítez-Bribiesca L: RNA interference (RNAi) and its therapeutic potential in cancer. Rev Invest Clin. 62:81–90. 2010.(In Spanish). PubMed/NCBI

15 

Farazi TA, Spitzer JI, Morozov P and Tuschl T: miRNAs in human cancer. J Pathol. 223:102–115. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lares MR, Rossi JJ and Ouellet DL: RNAi and small interfering RNAs in human disease therapeutic applications. Trends Biotechnol. 28:570–579. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Sui G, Soohoo C, Affar el B, Gay F and Shi Y, Forrester WC and Shi Y: A DNA vector based RNAi technology to suppress gene expression in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:5515–5520. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Yu JY, DeRuiter SL and Turner DL: RNA interfering by expression of short interfering RNAs and hairpin RNAs in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:6047–6052. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

McManus MT and Sharp PA: Gene silencing in mammals by small interfering RNAs. Nat Rev Genet. 3:737–747. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Macedo F, Ladeira K, Longatto-Filho A and Martins SF: gastric cancer and angiogenesis: Is VEGF a useful biomarker to assess progression and remission? J Gastric Cancer. 17:1–10. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Chen J, Wu H, Han D and Xie C: Using anti-VEGF McAb and magnetic nanoparticles as double-targeting vector for the radioimmunotherapy of liver cancer. Cancer Lett. 231:169–175. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Queiroga FL, Pires I, Parente M, Gregório H and Lopes CS: COX-2 over-expression correlates with VEGF and tumour angiogenesis in canine mammary cancer. Vet J. 189:77–82. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Botelho F, Pina F and Lunet N: VEGF and prostatic cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Prev. 19:385–392. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Eibl G, Bruemmer D, Okada Y, Duffy JP, Law RE, Reber HA and Hines OJ: PGE (2) is generated by specific COX-2 activity and increases VEGF production in COX-2-expressing human pancreatic cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 306:887–897. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Shah MA: The development of bevacizumab in noncolorectal gastrointestinal malignancies: Gastroesophageal, pancreatic, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 12:239–246. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Bhardwaj A, Kaur J, Wuest F and Knaus EE: Fluorophore-labeled cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for the imaging of cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression in cancer: Synthesis and biological studies. ChemMedChem. 9:109–116, 240. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Mansour JC, Aloia TA, Crane CH, Heimbach JK, Nagino M and Vauthey JN: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Expert consensus statement. HPB (Oxford). 17:691–699. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Tsao JI, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Hayakawa N, Kondo S, Nagino M, Miyachi M, Kanai M, Uesaka K, Oda K, et al: Management of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison of an American and a Japanese experience. Ann Surg. 232:166–174. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

McCaffrey AP, Meuse L, Pham TT, Conklin DS, Hannon GJ and Kay MA: RNA interference in adult mice. Nature. 418:38–39. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Petrocca F and Lieberman J: Promise and challenge of RNA interference-based therapy for cancer. J Clin Oncol. 29:747–754. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Addepalli MK, Ray KB, Kumar B, Ramnath RL, Chile S and Rao H: RNAi-mediated knockdown of AURKB and EGFR shows enhanced therapeutic efficacy in prostate tumor regression. Gene Ther. 17:352–359. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Cuevas EP, Escribano O, Monserrat J, Martínez-Botas J, Sánchez MG, Chiloeches A, Hernández-Breijo B, Sánchez-Alonso V, Román ID, Fernández-Moreno MD and Guijarro LG: RNAi-mediated silencing of insulin receptor substrate-4 enhances actinomycin D- and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced cell death in hepatocarcinoma cancer cell lines. J Cell Biochem. 108:1292–1301. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Varnholt H: The role of microRNAs in primary liver cancer. Ann Hepatol. 7:104–113. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

35 

Holash J, Davis S, Papadopoulos N, Croll SD, Ho L, Russell M, Boland P, Leidich R, Hylton D, Burova E, et al: VEGF-Trap: A VEGF blocker with potent antitumor effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:11393–11398. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Ylä-Herttuala S: Gene therapy with vascular endothelial growth factors. Biochem Soc Trans. 37:1198–1200. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Grünewald FS, Prota AE, Giese A and Ballmer-Hofer K: Structure-function analysis of VEGF receptor activation and the role of coreceptors in angiogenic signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1804:567–580. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Geva R, Prenen H, Topal B, Aerts R, Vannoote J and van Cutsem E: Biologic modulation of chemotherapy in patients with hepatic colorectal metastases: The role of anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR antibodies. J Surg Oncol. 102:937–945. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Vermeulen PB, van Golen KL and Dirix LY: Angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, growth pattern, and tumor emboli in inflammatory breast cancer: A review of the current knowledge. Cancer. 116(Suppl 11): S2748–S2754. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Winder T and Lenz HJ: Vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor signaling pathways as therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 138:2163–2176. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Kluger MS and Colegio OR: Lymphangiogenesis linked to VEGF-C from tumor-associated macrophages: Accomplices to metastasis by cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma? J Invest Dermatol. 131:17–19. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Beeghly-Fadiel A, Shu XO, Lu W, Long J, Cai Q, Xiang YB, Zheng Y, Zhao Z, Gu K, Gao YT and Zheng W: Genetic variation in VEGF family genes and breast cancer risk: A report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Genetics Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 20:33–41. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Nakatani H, Akimori T, Takezaki Y and Hanazaki K: Vascular endothelial growth factors and their receptors in the novel human cell line, HN-Eso-1, established from esophageal spindle cell carcinoma. J Med Invest. 57:232–236. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Park KS, Kim SJ, Kim KH and Kim JC: Clinical characteristics of TIMP2, MMP2, and MMP9 gene polymorphisms in colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 26:391–397. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Overall CM and Dean RA: Degradomics: Systems biology of the protease web. Pleiotropic roles of MMPs in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 25:69–75. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Gialeli C, Theocharis AD and Karamanos NK: Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression and their pharmacological targeting. FEBS J. 278:16–27. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2018
Volume 16 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Xiao K, Ouyang Z and Tang HH: Inhibiting the proliferation and metastasis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma cells by blocking the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor with small interfering RNA. Oncol Lett 16: 1841-1848, 2018.
APA
Xiao, K., Ouyang, Z., & Tang, H. (2018). Inhibiting the proliferation and metastasis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma cells by blocking the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor with small interfering RNA. Oncology Letters, 16, 1841-1848. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8840
MLA
Xiao, K., Ouyang, Z., Tang, H."Inhibiting the proliferation and metastasis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma cells by blocking the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor with small interfering RNA". Oncology Letters 16.2 (2018): 1841-1848.
Chicago
Xiao, K., Ouyang, Z., Tang, H."Inhibiting the proliferation and metastasis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma cells by blocking the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor with small interfering RNA". Oncology Letters 16, no. 2 (2018): 1841-1848. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8840