Open Access

Screening and identification of key biomarkers in bladder carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatics analysis

  • Authors:
    • Meiqin Yan
    • Xuan Jing
    • Yina Liu
    • Xiangrong Cui
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 21, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9002
  • Pages: 3092-3100
  • Copyright: © Yan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most common urogenital malignancies. However, present studies of its multiple gene interaction and cellular pathways remain unable to accurately verify the genesis and the development of BC. The aim of the present study was to investigate the genetic signatures of BC and identify its potential molecular mechanisms. The gene expression profiles of GSE31189 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The GSE31189 dataset contained 92 samples, including 52 BC and 40 non‑cancerous urothelial cells. To further examine the biological functions of the identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs), Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed, and a protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network was mapped using Cytoscape software. In total, 976 DEGs were identified in BC, including 457 upregulated genes and 519 downregulated genes. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses indicated that upregulated genes were significantly enriched in the cell cycle and the negative regulation of the apoptotic process, while the downregulated genes were mainly involved in cell proliferation, cell adhesion molecules and oxidative phosphorylation pathways (P<0.05). From the PPI network, the 12 nodes with the highest degrees were screened as hub genes; these genes were involved in certain pathways, including the chemokine‑mediated signaling pathway, fever generation, inflammatory response and the immune response nucleotide oligomerization domain‑like receptor signaling pathway. The present study used bioinformatics analysis of gene profile datasets and identified potential therapeutic targets for BC.

Introduction

Bladder cancer (BC), the most frequently occurring urogenital malignancy of the urinary tract worldwide, results in substantial morbidity and mortality (1,2). In the USA, bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer, with 76,960 estimated new cases and 16,390 mortalities in 2016 (3). In addition to other carcinoma types, such as cervical (4), prostate (5) and ovarian cancer (6), the accumulation of inherited and somatic mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are believed to be the reason for the occurrence, progression and metastasis of BC (79). Although a number of cancer-associated genes and cellular pathways have been proven to be associated with the initiation and development of BC (10,11), the accuracy of early diagnosis, therapeutic and prognostic evaluation for BC remains low. Consequently, investigating the molecular mechanisms, including the proliferation, apoptosis and invasion of BC is crucial for the progress of diagnostic and treatment strategies. With the development of gene microarray technology, various advanced techniques for assessing gene expression have been widely applied in assessing tumor development and progression with lower expenses, compared with past decades (12,13). In previous years, numerous gene expression profiling studies on BC have revealed hundreds of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and provided substantial functional information on gene regulatory network analysis (1416). However, comparative analysis of DEGs reported by independent research appears to rarely display substantial overlap (17), and no reliable biomarker profile discriminating cancerous from non-cancerous samples has been identified. At present, due to bioinformatics methods, the data generated by microarray technology have been analyzed in order to identify mRNA expression changes in collected urothelial cells and to examine DEGs in BC and non-cancerous urothelial cells (18). However, the interactions among DEGs, particularly pathways in the interaction network, remain to be elucidated.

In the present study, original data (data set GSE31189) were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (19), in order to identify DEGs between BC and non-cancerous urothelial cells. Then, functional annotation and network analyses were performed to identify DEGs. By analyzing the biological functions and networks of BC, the present study may be useful to gain a better understanding of BC development at a molecular level and explore the potential candidate biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment.

Materials and methods

Data source

The GSE31189 gene expression profile and its corresponding platform annotation files were downloaded from the GEO database. This data set was submitted by Professor Virginia Urquidi on 3rd August 2011, last updated on 21st April 2017 and stockpiled on the GPL570 platform (HG-U133_Plus_2) Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (Affymetrix; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). This gene expression data consisted of the data of 92 samples, including 52 BC and 40 non-cancerous urothelial cells.

Data preprocessing and screening of DEGs

The probes without annotation of the gene expression profiles were filtered using the Affy package (20), which is based on the Bioconductor principles of reproducibility, transparency and efficiency of development (21). The probe ID for each gene was then transformed into a gene symbol using the Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array annotation data (hgu133plus2.db) and Genome wide annotation for Human, version: 3.7 (org. Hs.eg.db) packages from Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org/). For a gene symbol corresponding to multiple probe IDs, the average value of these probes was calculated as the representative expression level of this gene. The DEGs were screened by using the Linear Models for Microarray Analysis package in R software (R ×64 3.3.3) (22) with cut-off criteria of P<0.05 and |log2 fold-change (FC)|>0.5.

Functional annotation and pathway enrichment

Gene Ontology analysis (GO) is a common useful approach for annotating genes and gene products and for identifying characteristic biological phenomena for high-throughput genome or transcriptome data (23,24). To describe gene product attributes, GO provides three categories of defined terms, including biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF) categories (25). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) is an integrated database resource for the systematic analysis of gene functions, linking genomic information with higher-order functional information (26). The two analyses were available in the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; https://david.ncifcrf.gov/; date of access, 8/02/2018), which is a bioinformatics data resource composed of an integrated biology knowledge base and analysis tools to extract biological meanings from large quantities of genes and protein collections through a novel agglomeration algorithm (27). In the present study, GO term analysis and KEGG pathway analysis were performed using the DAVID online tool. P<0.05 was set as the cut-off criterion.

PPI network construction and analysis of modules

Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database (http://string-db.org/) is an online software designed to assess protein-protein interaction (PPI) information, including direct (physical) and indirect (functional) associations (28). In the present study, the DEGs were mapped using STRING to evaluate the PPI information with a combined score of >0.4 set as the cut-off criterion. Then, the PPI network was visualized using Cytoscape 3.5.0 (29). To screen the hub genes, a node degree of ≥10 was selected as the threshold. Furthermore, the Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) plug-in was used to screen modules of hub genes from the PPI network with degree threshold=10, haircut on, node score cut-off=0.2, k-core=2 and maximum depth=100 (30). The genes in the significant modules were further mapped to GO terms and KEGG pathways for functional analysis.

PrognoScan database analysis

The overall survival (OS) rate of mRNA expression was assessed using an online database, PrognoScan (http://www.abren.net/PrognoScan/; keywords: NOD2, S100A9, CXCL1, CXCR2; date of access, 8/02/2018), which is a platform used for evaluating potential tumor markers and therapeutic targets. To evaluate the OS rate of patients with breast cancer, patient samples were divided into two groups by median expression [high vs. low expression; Threshold: NOD (0.87), S100A9 (0.77), CXCL1 (0.68), CXCR2 (0.55)] and analyzed using PrognoScan, with a hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals and Cox's Proportional-Hazards Model.

Results

Data processing and DEG screening

With a criteria of the false discovery ratio <0.05 and |log2 FC|≥0.571, a total of 976 DEGs (when compared with those of the noncancerous urothelial cells) were identified in the BC samples, including 457 upregulated genes and 519 downregulated genes (Fig. 1).

Functional enrichment of DEGs

DAVID analysis was performed to predict the potential functions and mechanisms of BC by mapping the upregulated and downregulated genes using GO terms and the KEGG pathways. The top five significant GO terms of the BP, CC and MF categories enriched by the up- and downregulated DEGs were identified (Figs. 2 and 3). The results demonstrated that the upregulated genes were mainly involved in the negative regulation of the apoptotic process in the BP category, constituted integral components of the plasma membrane in the CC category, and were mainly involved in protein binding in the MF category (Fig. 2), whereas the downregulated genes were mainly associated with cell proliferation in the BP category, were mainly intracellular in the CC category, and were mainly involved in metal ion binding in the MF category (Fig. 3). The results for the KEGG pathway enrichment are shown in Fig. 4, which indicated that the upregulated genes were significantly enriched in amoebiasis, malaria, osteoclast differentiation, Legionellosis, Chagas disease, advanced glycation end product-receptor for AGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications, salmonella infection, toxoplasmosis, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling pathway and rheumatoid arthritis pathways, while the downregulated genes were mainly enriched in cell adhesion molecules, oxidative phosphorylation, taurine and hypotaurine metabolism, collecting duct acid secretion, vitamin digestion and absorption, rheumatoid arthritis and vibrio cholerae infection pathways.

Construction of a PPI network and functional analysis for key genes

The Cytoscape tool visually constructed the PPI network with 98 nodes and 321 edges, which were predicted using STRING with a PPI score of >0.4 (Fig. 5). In the PPI network, 28 nodes with a degree of ≥10 were regarded as key genes (Table I), including interleukin (IL)-1B, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)9, heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 6, FGR proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase, ribosomal protein S6 kinase A1, TNF receptor superfamily member 1A, RAS-like family 11 member B, MMP1, chemokine ligand (CCL)5, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1), Pim-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase, nucleotide binding oligomerization domain containing 2 (NOD2), CCL20, src-related kinase lacking C-terminal regulatory tyrosine and N-terminal myristylation sites, serine threonine kinase 21B, S100 calcium binding protein A9 (S100A9), Kruppel-like factor 8, phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 β, cluster of differentiation 83, renin, G protein subunit α 15, transporter 1, ATP binding cassette subfamily B member, secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor, NME/NM23 family member 5, BCS homolog, ubiquinol-cytochome c reductase complex chaperone, cell division cycle 20 and NME/NM23 nucleoside diphosphate kinase 3. One module including 12 nodes and 62 edges was obtained using MCODE (Fig. 6). The heat map indicated that the 12 genes were able to distinguish the two groups of cell samples, in that their expression was distinctly different between the two groups (Fig. 7). GO term enrichment analysis demonstrated that in the BP category, the genes in this module were significantly involved in the chemokine-mediated signaling pathway, fever generation, inflammatory responses, immune responses and the positive regulation of cell division (Table II). The genes were significantly enriched in the CC category were significantly part of the extracellular space, autophagosome, cytoplasmic vesicle, extracellular matrix and lysosome (Table II). Finally, in the MF category, analysis revealed that the genes were mainly associated with chemokine activity, IL-1 receptor binding, C-C motif receptor chemokine receptor, cytokine activity and metalloendopeptidase activity (Table II). KEGG analysis revealed that the genes were mainly enriched in the TNF signaling pathway, rheumatoid arthritis, prion diseases, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction and NOD-like receptor signaling pathway (Table II).

Table I.

Key nodes in the protein-protein interaction network with a degree ≥10.

Table I.

Key nodes in the protein-protein interaction network with a degree ≥10.

GeneDegree of changeLog2 fold-change
IL-1B231.211413
MMP9220.762970
HSPA6201.198230
FGR180.674802
RPS6KA118−0.692775
TNFRSF1A170.601014
RASL11B16−0.600296
MMP1150.743885
CCL515−0.698948
CXCR2150.988178
CXCL1151.088843
PIM1140.686538
NOD2140.633431
CCL20140.677125
SRMS13−0.619940
STK21B13−0.598366
S100A9131.202516
KLF813−0.585851
PIK3c2B12−0.604130
CD83120.801585
REN12−0.737372
GNA15120.647069
TAP1111.004478
SLPI111.064963
NME511−0.905805
BCS1L10−0.621588
CDC20100.646275
NME310−0.709424

Table II.

Functional and pathway enrichment analysis of the genes in the module.

Table II.

Functional and pathway enrichment analysis of the genes in the module.

CategoryTermCount%P-value
GO BP GO:0070098-chemokine-mediated signaling pathway340.4 1.09×10−04
GO_BPGO:0001660-fever generation227.0 2.00×10−03
GO_BP GO:0006954-inflammatory response340.4 3.14×10−03
GO_BPGO:0006955-immune response340.4 3.21×10−03
GO_BPGO:0051781-positive regulation of cell division227.0 5.48×10−03
GO_CC GO:0005615-extracellular space547.4 1.86×10−04
GO_CC GO:0005776-autophagosome227.0 1.67×10−02
GO_CC GO:0031410-cytoplasmic vesicle227.0 3.19×10−02
GO_CC GO:0031012-extracellular matrix227.0 3.66×10−02
GO_CC GO:0005764-lysosome227.0 4.73×10−02
GO_MF GO:0008009-chemokine activity340.4 1.16×10−04
GO_MF GO:0005149-interleukin-1 receptor binding227.0 4.78×10−03
GO_MFGO:0048020-C-C motif receptor chemokine receptor binding227.0 1.01×10−02
GO_MFGO:0005125-cytokine activity227.0 4.28×10−02
GO_MF GO:0004222-metalloendopeptidase activity227.0 4.95×10−02
KEGG_PATHWAYecb04668: Tumor necrosis factor signaling pathway680.9 4.39×10−09
KEGG_PATHWAYecb05323: Rheumatoid arthritis567.4 3.04×10−07
KEGG_PATHWAYecb05020: Prion diseases340.4 3.42×10−04
KEGG_PATHWAYecb04060: Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction453.9 5.48×10−04
KEGG_PATHWAYecb04621: Nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor signaling pathway340.4 8.04×10−04

[i] GO, Gene Ontology; BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; MF, molecular function; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. The count was the number of enriched genes in each term. If there were >5 terms enriched in this category, the top five terms were selected according to their P-value.

Association between 12 key genes and prognosis in patients with BC

The PrognoScan database was used to perform the association analysis of mRNA expression and OS rate in patients with BC. As presented in Table III and Fig. 8, the high expression of NOD2 (P<0.05), S100A9 (P<0.001), CXCL1 (P<0.05) and CXCR2 (P<0.01) were significantly associated with a poor prognosis in patients with BC.

Table III.

Association between mRNA expression of enriched genes and overall survival in patients with bladder cancer.

Table III.

Association between mRNA expression of enriched genes and overall survival in patients with bladder cancer.

Gene nameEnd pointPROBE IDnCox P-valueHazard ratio
CCL5Overall survival rateILMN_17733521650.1124591.2
SLPIOverall survival rateILMN_16696501650.2256931.09
S100A9Overall survival rateILMN_17149911650.0001191.28
CXCL1Overall survival rateILMN_17878971650.0138031.23
TNFRSF1AOverall survival rateILMN_16850051650.7324441.08
CCL20Overall survival rateILMN_16572341650.6363720.95
MMP1Overall survival rateILMN_17264481650.2797561.07
NOD2Overall survival rateILMN_17625941650.0250391.45
IL1BOverall survival rateILMN_17755011650.3746881.10
CXCR2Overall survival rateILMN_17830851650.0060800.59
CD83Overall survival rateILMN_17805821650.1699561.27
MMP1Overall survival rateILMN_17963161650.1140521.15

Discussion

BC is the ninth most common genitourinary malignancy, globally and resulted in 165,000 mortalities in 2012 (3133). Understanding the molecular mechanism of BC is of great importance for diagnosis and treatment. Due to well-developed microarray and high-throughput sequencing technology, it is now easier to determine the general genetic alterations in the progression of diseases, and has been widely adopted to predict potential diagnosis and therapeutic targets for BC (34).

In the present study, data were extracted from the GSE31189 dataset and 457 upregulated and 519 downregulated DEGs between BC and normal control specimens were identified using bioinformatics analysis. The upregulated genes were enriched in the negative regulation of apoptotic processes and the positive regulation of cell division, while the downregulated genes were mainly involved in cell proliferation, bicellular tight junction, mitochondrial matrix and immune responses. Furthermore, by constructing the PPI, a number of key genes were identified that may be useful in future therapeutic studies on BC. Notably, key nodes in the PPI network and genes in the significant modules, including NOD2, S100A9, CXCL1 and CXCR2, may have specific contributions to the occurrence and development of BC.

The NOD2 gene, a member of the evolutionarily conserved Nod-like receptors family, is located on chromosome 16q21 (35,36). Wang et al revealed that the abnormal expression of NOD2 was highly expressed in primary liver tumor types, which was associated with a shorter median survival time (36). In addition, in the present study, a higher NOD2 mRNA expression was identified in BC, which was associated with a shorter OS rate.

S100A9, a member of the S100 family of calcium-binding proteins, is primarily detected in neutrophil granulocytes and known to serve a function in the innate immune system (37,38). Previous studies have demonstrated that the abnormal overexpression of S100A9 is an unfavorable prognostic factor for carcinogenesis and prognosis in various neoplasms, such as hypopharyngeal and bladder cancer (3943). Additionally, S100A9 is associated with colorectal carcinoma progression and contributes to colorectal carcinoma cell survival and migration via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (37). In the present study, S100A9 was revealed to be differentially expressed in BC and non-cancerous urothelial cells and was identified as a key node in the PPI network constructed using DEGs between these two groups. The results additionally demonstrated that a high S100A9 expression was associated with a shorter OS rate. Therefore, this gene may be an essential marker for the diagnosis and prognosis of BC.

CXCL1, a member of the CXC chemokine family, was originally characterized by Wang et al (44) and is known to promote the proliferation of melanoma cells. Previous studies have demonstrated that CXCL1 may be associated with tumor epithelial-stromal interactions that facilitate tumor growth and invasion (4547). In addition, Wang et al (48) revealed that CXCL1 derived from tumor-associated lymphatic endothelial cells drives gastric cancer cells into the lymphatic system by activating integrin β1/focal adhesion kinase/protein kinase B (Akt) signaling. Furthermore, Kawanishi et al (49) revealed that CXCL1 may modulate the invasive abilities of BC cells, and therefore is a potential candidate biomarker and therapeutic target for invasive BC. In the present study, a higher CXCL1 mRNA expression was identified in patients with BC in the GSE31189 gene expression profile. Furthermore, PrognoScan analysis results revealed that high CXCL1 expression was significantly associated with a shorter OS rate. Due to these findings, the expression level of CXCL1 may be a useful prognostic marker of BC.

CXCR2, the co-receptor of IL-8 and CXCL1, is an important therapeutic target in a number of solid tumor types, including lung, breast, prostate, ovarian, colorectal and liver cancer (5055). Xu et al (56) revealed that CXCR2 may promote breast cancer metastasis and chemoresistance via the suppression of AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 and activation of cyclooxygenase 2. Inhibition of CXCR2 may reduce the activity of breast cancer stem cells and improve the survival of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients in combination with HER2-target chemotherapies (57). Furthermore, Gao et al (58) demonstrated that the CXCL5/CXCR2 axis may promote BC cell migration and invasion by activating the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt-induced upregulation of MMP2/MMP9. In the present study, CXCR2 was increased in BC compared with normal specimens, similar with the previous studies. However, the BC patients with higher mRNA levels of CXCR2 were predicted to have a better OS rate. As few studies have focused on CXCR2, the underlying function of CXCR2 requires further research.

Altogether, the DEGs identified in the BC urothelial cells when compared with the normal controls may be involved in tumorigenesis. The key nodes identified in the PPI network constructed with these DEGs and genes involved in the significant module, including NOD2, S100A9 and CXCL1, may be important in the development of BC, and may provide valuable clues in order to investigate the pathogenesis of BC. However, further biological experimental evidence is required in order to confirm the function of the identified gene in BC.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Scientific Research Project of Shanxi Provincial Department of Health (grant no. 201601070).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

XJ and XC participated in the design of the present study, performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. MY and YL performed the study and collected background information and data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

DEG

differentially expressed gene

GO

gene ontology

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

PPI

protein-protein interaction

References

1 

Hao L, Zhao Y, Li ZG, He HG, Liang Q, Zhang ZG, Shi ZD, Zhang PY and Han CH: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of prostate and bladder cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 13:3638–3640. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Li X, Ma X, Tang L, Wang B, Chen L, Zhang F and Zhang X: Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and bladder: A systematic review and meta-analys. Oncotarget. 8:62681–62692. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Peng M, Huang Y, Tao T, Peng CY, Su Q, Xu W, Darko KO, Tao X and Yang X: Metformin and gefitinib cooperate to inhibit bladder cancer growth via both AMPK and EGFR pathways joining at Akt and Erk. Sci Rep. 6:286112016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Kim HJ, Eoh KJ, Kim LK, Nam EJ, Yoon SO, Kim KH, Lee JK, Kim SW and Kim YT: The long noncoding RNA HOXA11 antisense induces tumor progression and stemness maintenance in cervical cancer. Oncotarget. 7:83001–83016. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Luo G, Wang M, Wu X, Tao D, Xiao X, Wang L, Min F, Zeng F and Jiang G: Long non-coding RNA meg3 inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in prostate cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 37:2209–2220. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Huang S, Qing C, Huang Z and Zhu Y: The long non-coding RNA CCAT2 is up-regulated in ovarian cancer and associated with poor prognosis. Diagn Pathol. 11:492016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Cui X, Jing X, Long C, Yi Q, Tian J and Zhu J: Accuracy of the urine UCA1 for diagnosis of bladder cancer: A meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 8:35222–35233. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Cui X, Jing X and Wu X: The prognostic value of long non coding RNAs in cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 8:62470–62477. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Jing X, Liang H, Cui X, Han C, Hao C and Huo K: Long noncoding RNA CCAT2 can predict metastasis and a poor prognosis: A meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 468:159–165. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Cui X, Jing X, Yi Q, Long C, Tan B, Li X, Chen X, Huang Y, Xiang Z, Tian J and Zhu J: Systematic analysis of gene expression alterations and clinical outcomes of STAT3 in cancer. Oncotarget. 9:3198–3213. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Cui X, Jing X, Yi Q, Long C, Tian J and Zhu J: Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of SDC1 overexpression in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 8:111444–111455. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Guo Y, Sheng Q, Li J, Ye F, Samuels DC and Shyr Y: Large scale comparison of gene expression levels by microarrays and RNAseq using TCGA data. PLoS One. 8:e714622013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Senchenko VN, Kisseljova NP, Ivanova TA, Dmitriev AA, Krasnov GS, Kudryavtseva AV, Panasenko GV, Tsitrin EB, Lerman MI, Kisseljov FL, et al: Novel tumor suppressor candidates on chromosome 3 revealed by NotI-microarrays in cervical cancer. Epigenetics. 8:409–420. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Chen G, Li Y, Su Y, Zhou L, Zhang H, Shen Q, Du C, Li H, Wen Z, Xia Y and Tang W: Identification of candidate genes for necrotizing enterocolitis based on microarray data. Gene. 661:152–159. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Shu B, Fang Y, He W, Yang J and Dai C: Identification of macrophage-related candidate genes in lupus nephritis using bioinformatics analysis. Cell Signal. 46:43–51. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Shao K, Shen LS, Li HH, Huang S and Zhang Y: Systematic-analysis of mRNA expression profiles in skeletal muscle of patients with type II diabetes: The glucocorticoid was central in pathogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 233:4068–4076. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Chen J, Ding J, Wang Z, Zhu J, Wang X and Du J: Identification of downstream metastasis-associated target genes regulated by LSD1 in colon cancer cells. Oncotarget. 8:19609–19630. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Urquidi V, Goodison S, Cai Y, Sun Y and Rosser CJ: A candidate molecular biomarker panel for the detection of bladder cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 21:2149–2158. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Edgar R, Domrachev M and Lash AE: Gene expression omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:207–210. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM and Irizarry RA: Affy-analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics. 20:307–315. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Carvalho BS and Irizarry RA: A framework for oligonucleotide microarray preprocessing. Bioinformatics. 26:2363–2367. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, et al: Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5:R802004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Gene Ontology Consortium, . The Gene Ontology (GO) project in 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:(Database Issue). D322–D326. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al: Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 25:25–29. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, Lomax J, Ashburner M, Foulger R, Eilbeck K, Lewis S, Marshall B, Mungall C, et al: The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:(Database Issue). D258–D261. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M, Katayama T, Kawashima S, Okuda S, Tokimatsu T and Yamanishi Y: KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:(Database Issue). D480–D484. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

da Huang W, Sherman BT and Lempicki RA: Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 4:44–57. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Roth A, Santos A, Tsafou KP, et al: STRING v10: Protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:(Database Issue). D447–D452. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL and Ideker T: Cytoscape 2.8: New features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 27:431–432. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Shrivastava S, Hassanali M, Stothard P, Chang Z and Woolsey J: DrugBank: A comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:(Database Issue). D668–D672. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Cui X, Jing X, Long C, Tian J and Zhu J: Long noncoding RNA MEG3, a potential novel biomarker to predict the clinical outcome of cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 8:19049–19056. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Gnesin S, Mitsakis P, Cicone F, Deshayes E, Dunet V, Gallino AF, Kosinski M, Baechler S, Buchegger F, Viertl D and Prior JO: First in-human radiation dosimetry of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGDyK. EJNMMI Res. 7:432017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Cohen T, Ricchiuti D and Memo M: Bladder cancer that metastasized to the skin: A unique presentation that signifies poor prognosis. Rev Urol. 19:67–71. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

34 

Zhang Y, Fang L, Zang Y and Xu Z: Identification of core genes and key pathways via integrated analysis of gene expression and DNA methylation profiles in bladder cancer. Med Sci Monit. 24:3024–3033. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Liu J, He C, Xu Q, Xing C and Yuan Y: NOD2 polymorphisms associated with cancer risk: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 9:e893402014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Wang X, Yang C, Liao X, Han C, Yu T, Huang K, Yu L, Qin W, Zhu G, Su H, et al: NLRC and NLRX gene family mRNA expression and prognostic value in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Med. 6:2660–2672. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Duan L, Wu R, Ye L, Wang H, Yang X, Zhang Y, Chen X, Zuo G, Zhang Y, Weng Y, et al: S100A8 and S100A9 are associated with colorectal carcinoma progression and contribute to colorectal carcinoma cell survival and migration via Wnt/β-catenin pathway. PLoS One. 8:e620922013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Källberg E, Vogl T, Liberg D, Olsson A, Björk P, Wikström P, Bergh A, Roth J, Ivars F and Leanderson T: S100A9 interaction with TLR4 promotes tumor growth. PLoS One. 7:e342072012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

De Veirman K, De Beule N, Maes K, Menu E, De Bruyne E, De Raeve H, Fostier K, Moreaux J, Kassambara A, Hose D, et al: Extracellular S100A9 protein in bone marrow supports multiple myeloma survival by stimulating angiogenesis and cytokine secretion. Cancer Immunol Res. 5:839–846. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Yasar O, Akcay T, Obek C and Turegun FA: Significance of S100A8, S100A9 and calprotectin levels in bladder cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 77:437–441. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Wu P, Quan H, Kang J, He J, Luo S, Xie C, Xu J, Tang Y and Zhao S: Downregulation of calcium-binding protein S100A9 inhibits hypopharyngeal cancer cell proliferation and invasion ability through inactivation of NF-κB signaling. Oncol Res. 25:1479–1488. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Yang Q, Li X, Chen H, Cao Y, Xiao Q, He Y, Wei J and Zhou J: IRF7 regulates the development of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells through S100A9 transrepression in cancer. Oncogene. 36:2969–2980. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Lim SY, Yuzhalin AE, Gordon-Weeks AN and Muschel RJ: Tumor-infiltrating monocytes/macrophages promote tumor invasion and migration by upregulating S100A8 and S100A9 expression in cancer cells. Oncogene. 35:5735–5745. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Wang D, Yang W, Du J, Devalaraja MN, Liang P, Matsumoto K, Tsubakimoto K, Endo T and Richmond A: MGSA/GRO-mediated melanocyte transformation involves induction of Ras expression. Oncogene. 19:4647–4659. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Verbeke H, Struyf S, Laureys G and Van Damme J: The expression and role of CXC chemokines in colorectal cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 22:345–358. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Miyake M, Lawton A, Goodison S, Urquidi V, Gomes-Giacoia E, Zhang G, Ross S, Kim J and Rosser CJ: Chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 1 (CXCL1) protein expression is increased in aggressive bladder cancers. BMC Cancer. 13:3222013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Han KQ, Han H, He XQ, Wang L, Guo XD, Zhang XM, Chen J, Zhu QG, Nian H, Zhai XF and Jiang MW: Chemokine CXCL1 may serve as a potential molecular target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Med. 5:2861–2871. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Wang Z, Wang Z, Li G, Wu H, Sun K, Chen J, Feng Y, Chen C, Cai S, Xu J and He Y: CXCL1 from tumor-associated lymphatic endothelial cells drives gastric cancer cell into lymphatic system via activating integrin β1/FAK/AKT signaling. Cancer Lett. 385:28–38. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Kawanishi H, Matsui Y, Ito M, Watanabe J, Takahashi T, Nishizawa K, Nishiyama H, Kamoto T, Mikami Y, Tanaka Y, et al: Secreted CXCL1 is a potential mediator and marker of the tumor invasion of bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 14:2579–2587. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Cong L, Qiu ZY, Zhao Y, Wang WB, Wang CX, Shen HC and Han JQ: Loss of β-arrestin-2 and activation of CXCR2 correlate with lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer. J Cancer. 8:2785–2792. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Devapatla B, Sharma A and Woo S: CXCR2 inhibition combined with sorafenib improved antitumor and antiangiogenic response in preclinical models of ovarian cancer. PLoS One. 10:e01392372015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Zhang T, Tseng C, Zhang Y, Sirin O, Corn PG, Li-Ning-Tapia EM, Troncoso P, Davis J, Pettaway C, Ward J, et al: CXCL1 mediates obesity-associated adipose stromal cell trafficking and function in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Commun. 7:116742016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Ignacio RM, Kabir SM, Lee ES, Adunyah SE and Son DS: NF-κB-mediated CCL20 reigns dominantly in CXCR2-driven ovarian cancer progression. PLoS One. 11:e01641892016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Zhao J, Ou B, Feng H, Wang P, Yin S, Zhu C, Wang S, Chen C, Zheng M, Zong Y, et al: Overexpression of CXCR2 predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 8:28442–28454. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

55 

Ding D, Zhang Y, Yang R, Wang X, Ji G, Huo L, Shao Z and Li X: miR-940 suppresses tumor cell invasion and migration via regulation of CXCR2 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed Res Int. 2016:76183422016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Xu H, Lin F, Wang Z, Yang L, Meng J, Ou Z, Shao Z, Di G and Yang G: CXCR2 promotes breast cancer metastasis and chemoresistance via suppression of AKT1 and activation of COX2. Cancer Lett. 412:69–80. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Singh JK, Farnie G, Bundred NJ, Simões BM, Shergill A, Landberg G, Howell SJ and Clarke RB: Targeting CXCR1/2 significantly reduces breast cancer stem cell activity and increases the efficacy of inhibiting HER2 via HER2-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Clin Cancer Res. 19:643–656. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Gao Y, Guan Z, Chen J, Xie H, Yang Z, Fan J, Wang X and Li L: CXCL5/CXCR2 axis promotes bladder cancer cell migration and invasion by activating PI3K/AKT-induced upregulation of MMP2/MMP9. Int J Oncol. 47:690–700. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-2018
Volume 16 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yan M, Jing X, Liu Y and Cui X: Screening and identification of key biomarkers in bladder carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatics analysis. Oncol Lett 16: 3092-3100, 2018.
APA
Yan, M., Jing, X., Liu, Y., & Cui, X. (2018). Screening and identification of key biomarkers in bladder carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatics analysis. Oncology Letters, 16, 3092-3100. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9002
MLA
Yan, M., Jing, X., Liu, Y., Cui, X."Screening and identification of key biomarkers in bladder carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatics analysis". Oncology Letters 16.3 (2018): 3092-3100.
Chicago
Yan, M., Jing, X., Liu, Y., Cui, X."Screening and identification of key biomarkers in bladder carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatics analysis". Oncology Letters 16, no. 3 (2018): 3092-3100. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9002