Selective enrichment of CD133+/SOX2+ glioblastoma stem cells via adherent culture
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 17, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9154
- Pages: 4567-4576
Abstract
Introduction
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), central nervous system (CNS) tumors can be subdivided into primary and secondary tumors. Secondary tumors develop from cells that spread to the brain from a cancer in another part of the body. Primary brain tumors, including medulloblastoma, choroid plexus papilloma, pituitary tumor, neurocytoma, germ cell tumor and glioma in the majority of cases start from local cells of the brain (1). Given the ability of brain tumors to infiltrate and a high rate of recurrence, the prognosis is usually poor even though multimodal therapies have been applied (2). For example, it was reported that the median survival is ≤15 months for patients with grade IV glioma (glioblastoma, GBM) (2).
The cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis originates from the hierarchical cellular organization within a tumor. Indeed, CSCs could be enriched and expanded in vitro, and more importantly they could initiate the formation of new tumors following xenotransplantation (3–7). An increasing number of studies suggested that purified CSCs grown in vitro could be applied for studying the initiation and progression of tumor as well as chemo- or radiotherapy resistance, tumor relapse and testing for new therapeutic drugs (3,5). In general, suspension spheroid-formation culture protocols are used for CSC enrichment. Solid brain tumor mass is disassociated into single cells and then grown in a non-adherent serum-free culture with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) to trigger spheroid formation (6). By using this suspension culture technique, CSCs have been successfully cultured from various brain tumors, including glioblastoma, medulloblastoma and oligodendroglioma (4,7–9). However, the efficiency for initial growing tumorspheres from brain tumors may be low and variable (10–12). Furthermore, the spheroid culture method tends to enrich CSCs with specific molecular profiles, including phosphatase and tensin homolog deficiency, wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase 1, amplified chromosome 7 and deleted chromosome 10q (4,13).
Previously, two groups reported that they developed a new adherent culture protocol for growing brain CSCs (14,15). In this protocol, freshly resected glioblastomas from patients were digested into single cells and then seeded onto laminin-coated culture surface under standard neural stem cell culture conditions (14,15). Through this advanced cell culture protocol, brain CSCs could be enriched as an adherent monolayer, which displayed a great potential for initiating the formation of new tumors in vivo (14,15).
In the present study, the efficiency of deriving brain CSCs was investigated by using this adherent culture method. Whether the adherent culture method may be applied to a wide spectrum of brain tumors or specifically to glioblastomas was also examined. The results indicated that CSCs from glioblastomas but not other types of brain tumors could be grown through adherent culture and the derivation efficiency was ~50%. It was also found that CD133+/Sox2+ cells within the glioblastomas might be the original cells, which were enriched under adherent culture conditions.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The entire study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (Shanghai, China). All patients provided written informed consent to the surgical procedures and gave permission for the use of resected tissue specimens. All animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji University (Shanghai, China). A total of 20 male Balb/c nude mice (18-20 g, 6 weeks old) purchased from Shanghai Slaccas Experimental Animal Limited Company (Shanghai, China), were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions throughout the experiments that were automatically maintained at a temperature of 23±2°C, a relative humidity of 45-65%, and a controlled 12/12 h light/dark cycle. Animals had ad libitum access to food and water.
Brain tumor samples
Tumor specimens were obtained from 18 patients with CNS tumors who underwent surgical procedures at the neurosurgery department, the Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital. Tumors were classified by histopathologic examination according to the WHO classification, including the cytokeratin AE1/AE3, epithelial tumor marker (16). The clinical profiles of the patients were obtained from medical records, and patient characteristics are listed in Table I.
Isolation of primary brain CSCs
The standard CSC enrichment protocols (14,15) were followed, which resemble the culture conditions for normal neural stem cells. The tumor tissues were minced with a scissor and then digested with accutase (A11105; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) for 20 min. The cells were then triturated into single cells and plated on culture surfaces precoated with laminin for ≥3 h at 37°C. The formula for the culture medium (DMEM/F12/N2/B27) was, DMEM/F12 (catalog no. 11330; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 1× N2 (catalog no. 17502; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 1× B27 supplement (catalog no. 17504; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 10 ng/ml EGF (catalog no. E9644; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 10 ng/ml bFGF (catalog no. 100-18B; PeproTech, Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). The cells were attached overnight, and cell debris together with floating red blood cells and tumor cells were removed on the next day. The established CSC lines were regularly passaged every 5-6 days by using accutase for digestion.
Mice brain tissue collection
Male C57BL/6 nude mice (6 weeks) were purchased from Slaccas Experimental Animals LLC, Shanghai Slaccas (Shanghai, China). The mice were deeply anesthetized with avertin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PB for 15 min via transcardial perfusion. The brains were excised and dehydrated in gradient sucrose. The frozen sections were cut at 40 µm in thickness using a freezing microtome (Leica Microsystems, Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, USA).
Immunostaining
The expression levels of CD133, Nestin, Sox2 and GFAP in brain tumor tissues, normal mice brain or cultured cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence staining. The resected brain tumors were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 3 h, dehydrated by sucrose and sectioned using a microtome. The cultured cells were plated on laminin-coated coverslips and subsequently were used for immunostaining. The sections or 4% PFA fixed-coverslips with cultured cells were blocked with 10% normal donkey serum (Beijing Biodee Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS for 1 h at room temperature followed by incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. On the next day, after adequate washing, the tissue sections or coverslips were incubated with the appropriate fluorescence-labeled secondary antibodies for 40 min at room temperature. The antibodies used in this study were: Anti-CD133 (1:50; catalog no. ARH4033; Antibody Revolution Inc., San Diego, USA), anti-Nestin (1:500; catalog no. MAB5326; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), anti-Sox2 (1:500; catalog no. AF2018; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-GFAP (1:1,000; catalog no. z0334; Dako A/S, Glostrup, Denmark), Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-goat (1:1,000, catalog no. 705035003; Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., West Grove, PA, USA), Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1:1,000, catalog no. 115035003; Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc.) and Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:1,000, catalog no. 111035003; Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc.). The nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst solution for 5 min at room temperature. The images were taken with a confocal microscope (SP-5; Leica Microsystems, Inc.).
Statistical analysis
The data were statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical (version 21) software from SPSS, Inc., (Chicago, IL, USA) and using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Enrichment of CSCs from clinically resected glioblastomas through adherent culture
A total of 18 surgically resected brain tumors were mechanically grinded followed by digestion with accutase. Single cell mixtures were plated down onto laminin-coated surface in DMEM/F12/N2/B27 medium supplied with bFGF and EGF. A total of 4 adherent lines were then successfully established from these 18 tumors. As indicated in Table I, all 4 tumors that were able to generate adherent cultures were primary glioblastomas (grade IV astrocytoma). While other tumor subtypes, including germ cell tumor (patient no. 1), ependymoma (patient no. 8), neurocytoma (patient no. 9), low-grade astrocytoma (patient nos. 2, 5, 12, 14 and 17), and secondary brain tumor metastasized from lung adenocarcinoma (patient no. 19), were not able to generate adherent cultures. This suggests that the adherent culture paradigm favors enriching CSCs from glioblastomas. A total of 4 out of 8 glioblastomas generated adherent CSCs, and therefore the derivation efficiency was ~50% (Fig. 1A-D). The derivation efficiency may be more closely associated with the molecular signatures of CSCs rather than the proliferation rate of the tumor cells, since there is no difference in the percentage of Ki67+ cells in the tumor mass between the groups that succeeded and failed (Table I). A total of 3 out of 4 adherently cultured CSCs were able to be for >50 passages, while cell line 15 gradually stopped growing and died within 3 passages. All derived cell lines exhibited typical progenitor morphology, and tumorspheres were easily formed from adherent cells when re-suspended in a petri dish (Fig. 1E and F). In addition, the cultured cells uniformly expressed CSC markers-Nestin, Sox2, CD133 and GFAP (Fig. 2). Together, these data indicated that the adherent culture paradigm is suitable for enriching homogenous CSCs. In addition, this adherent culture method is more suitable for enriching CSCs from glioblastomas and is less efficient for other brain tumor subtypes.
Secondary brain tumor does not contain Sox2+/CD133+ cells and fails to generate adherent CSCs
Next, whether different types of brain tumors might harbor various molecular signatures were examined, which may account for the differences in the efficiency of CSC enrichment. Nestin, Sox2, CD133 and GFAP are key progenitor markers used for labeling brain CSCs (17). To test the specificity of the antibodies, normal brain tissues that were adjacent to tumors and adult mouse brain tissues were used for immunostaining. As expected, only GFAP-positive astrocytes were detected in normal brain tissues that were adjacent to tumors and adult mouse brain sections. By contrast, no immunostaining were detected for Nestin, Sox2 or CD133 (Fig. 3A, B, D and E). The tumor from patient no. 19 was a secondary brain tumor that was metastasized from lung adenocarcinoma. The results indicated that the metastasized tumor only had infiltrated GFAP+ astrocytes, whereas it was negative for Nestin, Sox2 or CD133, confirming that the metastasized tumor cell origin was not of a neural lineage (Fig. 3C and F). Furthermore, enriching CSCs from this tumor by using the adherent culture paradigm failed, suggesting that the adherent culture method may favor tumors of a neural lineage.
Sox2-negative brain tumors fail to generate adherent CSCs
The tumors from patients with pilocytic astrocytoma (WHO grade I, patient no. 17) and CNS germ cell tumor (patient no. 1) failed to yield adherent CSCs. The immunostaining results showed that there was a significant number of GFAP+, Nestin+, CD133+, GFAP+/Nestin+ and GFAP+/CD133+ cells within the original biopsy compared with Sox2+ cells, which were rarely identified (Fig. 4A-F). These data indicated that Sox2+ cells may be from cells that were enriched on laminin-coated culture surface and neither GFAP+/Nestin+/Sox2− nor GFAP+/CD133+/Sox2− cells were able to be cultured under the adherent culture conditions.
CD133-negative brain tumors fail to generate adherent CSCs
The tumors from patients with astrocytoma (WHO grade II, patient no. 2) and ependymoma (WHO grade II, patient no. 8) also failed to generate adherent CSCs. The immunostaining studies indicated that these tumors did contain large populations of Sox2+ cells (24-33%). Moreover, there were also a large amount of GFAP+, Netstin+, Sox2+/GFAP+, Sox2+/Nestin+ and GFAP+/Nestin+ cells within the tumor mass. However, these tumors almost completely lacked CD133 expression (Fig. 5A-F). It was therefore hypothesized that CD133 expression may be another prerequisite for enrichment of adherent CSCs.
Sox2+/CD133+ glioblastomas were able to generate adherent CSCs
Adherent CSCs were successfully enriched from glioblastomas (WHO grade IV, patient nos. 3, 6, 15 and 18). The immunostaining of these tumor samples indicated a high level of Sox2 expression (30%) as well as a high level of CD133 expression (from 10 to 14%) (Fig. 6D-F). The percentage of GFAP+ and Nestin+ cells were similarly detected within the tumor samples (Fig. 6D-F). The glioblastomas comprised 4-5% Sox2+/CD133+ cells as quantified in Fig. 6G-I. Combined with aforementioned data that Sox2− or CD133− tumors failed to enrich CSCs, it was concluded that Sox2+/CD133+ cells may represent CSCs within the tumor biopsy, and these double positive cells may be adherently enriched.
Discussion
In the present study, the feasibility of the adherent culture paradigm in enriching brain CSCs was analyzed. A total of 4/9 glioblastomas were able to successfully yield CSCs with a high purity, which was positive for GFAP, Nestin, Sox2 and CD133. It was also revealed that Sox2+/CD133+ cells might be originated from cells that were enriched under the adherent culture conditions.
CD133, Nestin, GFAP and Sox2 are frequently used as key markers to characterize CSCs in human glioblastomas (17). Among these key markers, CD133 is the most widely used for identification and enrichment of CSCs. CD133 may also be used to predict prognosis of individual glioblastoma of patient and allow specific therapies (18–20). At the cellular level, the knockdown of CD133 in CSCs significantly compromised their self-renewal ability and tumorigenic potential (21).
Sox2 is a transcription factor involved in pluripotent stem cell or neural stem cell maintenance and lineage reprogramming (22–24). Sox2 is also another CSC marker for glioblastomas due in part to its association with initiating gliomas as well as its role in multipotency and cell cycle progression of progenitor cells (9,25,26). Silencing of Sox2 in glioblastomas results in cell cycle arrest (9,25–29). Moreover, high level of Sox2 expression could also serve as a reliable prognostic indication for accelerated disease progression and poor clinical outcomes (26,29,30).
In the present study, Sox2+/CD133+ cells may be easily enriched through adherent culture. There is not a single marker, which has been shown to be sufficient to confer stem cell-like properties. Therefore, a combination of different markers is used to identify and isolate CSCs in glioma, including Nestin, Sox2 and GFAP (4,30–35). Despite CD133-positive glioma cells exhibiting CSC properties, there is a subset of CD133-negative cells with apparent stem cell-like characteristics (17–20). On the other hand, Sox2 is also expressed in more differentiated neoplastic cells within the glioblastoma (9,25–27,29). These findings are in line with our conclusion that Sox2+/CD133+ cells rather than those single positive cells represent real CSCs and the cells were efficiently enriched under adherent culture conditions in vitro.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Funding
The present study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2018YFA0108000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31271588) and partly by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
All authors discussed the experiments and contributed to the text of the manuscript. KL and ZC conducted most of the experiments and wrote the draft of the manuscript. LL, QZ and XZ conceived, discussed the project and modified the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (Shanghai, China).
Patient consent for publication
All patients or parents of patients under 16 provided written informed consent for publication according to the ethical principles of Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Thurnher MM: 2007 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Cancer Imaging. 9(Special Issue A): S1–S3. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wen PY and Kesari S: Malignant gliomas in adults. N Engl J Med. 359:492–507. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen J, Li Y, Yu TS, McKay RM, Burns DK, Kernie SG and Parada LF: A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth following chemotherapy. Nature. 488:522–526. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen R, Nishimura MC, Bumbaca SM, Kharbanda S, Forrest WF, Kasman IM, Greve JM, Soriano RH, Gilmour LL, Rivers CS, et al: A hierarchy of self-renewing tumor-initiating cell types in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 17:362–375. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gillet JP, Calcagno AM, Varma S, Marino M, Green LJ, Vora MI, Patel C, Orina JN, Eliseeva TA, Singal V, et al: Redefining the relevance of established cancer cell lines to the study of mechanisms of clinical anti-cancer drug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:18708–18713. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee J, Kotliarova S, Kotliarov Y, Li A, Su Q, Donin NM, Pastorino S, Purow BW, Christopher N, Zhang W, et al: Tumor stem cells derived from glioblastomas cultured in bFGF and EGF more closely mirror the phenotype and genotype of primary tumors than do serum-cultured cell lines. Cancer Cell. 9:391–403. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, Squire JA, Bayani J, Hide T, Henkelman RM, Cusimano MD and Dirks PB: Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature. 432:396–401. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang X, Ketova T, Litingtung Y and Chiang C: Isolation, enrichment, and maintenance of medulloblastoma stem cells. J Vis Exp. 2086:2010. | |
Favaro R, Appolloni I, Pellegatta S, Sanga AB, Pagella P, Gambini E, Pisati F, Ottolenghi S, Foti M, Finocchiaro G, et al: Sox2 is required to maintain cancer stem cells in a mouse model of high-grade oligodendroglioma. Cancer Res. 74:1833–1844. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reynolds BA and Rietze RL: Neural stem cells and neurospheres-re-evaluating the relationship. Nat Methods. 2:333–336. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Singec I, Knoth R, Meyer RP, Maciaczyk J, Volk B, Nikkhah G, Frotscher M and Snyder EY: Defining the actual sensitivity and specificity of the neurosphere assay in stem cell biology. Nat Methods. 3:801–806. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Suslov ON, Kukekov VG, Ignatova TN and Steindler DA: Neural stem cell heterogeneity demonstrated by molecular phenotyping of clonal neurospheres. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:14506–14511. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Balvers RK, Kleijn A, Kloezeman JJ, French PJ, Kremer A, van den Bent MJ, Dirven CM, Leenstra S and Lamfers ML: Serum-free culture success of glial tumors is related to specific molecular profiles and expression of extracellular matrix-associated gene modules. Neuro Oncol. 15:1684–1695. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fael A, l-Mayhani TM, Ball SL, Zhao JW, Fawcett J, Ichimura K, Collins PV and Watts C: An efficient method for derivation and propagation of glioblastoma cell lines that conserves the molecular profile of their original tumours. J Neurosci Methods. 176:192–199. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pollard SM, Yoshikawa K, Clarke ID, Danovi D, Stricker S, Russell R, Bayani J, Head R, Lee M, Bernstein M, et al: Glioma stem cell lines expanded in adherent culture have tumor-specific phenotypes and are suitable for chemical and genetic screens. Cell Stem Cell. 4:568–580. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P and Ellison DW: The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A summary. Acta Neuropathol. 131:803–820. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ma YH, Mentlein R, Knerlich F, Kruse ML, Mehdorn HM and Held-Feindt J: Expression of stem cell markers in human astrocytomas of different WHO grades. J Neurooncol. 86:31–45. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pallini R, Ricci-Vitiani L, Montano N, Mollinari C, Biffoni M, Cenci T, Pierconti F, Martini M, De Maria R and Larocca LM: Expression of the stem cell marker CD133 in recurrent glioblastoma and its value for prognosis. Cancer. 117:162–174. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
He J, Shan Z, Li L, Liu F, Liu Z, Song M and Zhu H: Expression of glioma stem cell marker CD133 and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase is associated with resistance to radiotherapy in gliomas. Oncol Rep. 26:1305–1313. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Shin JH, Lee YS, Hong YK and Kang CS: Correlation between the prognostic value and the expression of the stem cell marker CD133 and isocitrate dehydrogenase1 in glioblastomas. J Neurooncol. 115:333–341. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brescia P, Ortensi B, Fornasari L, Levi D, Broggi G and Pelicci G: CD133 is essential for glioblastoma stem cell maintenance. Stem Cells. 31:857–869. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maucksch C, Jones KS and Connor B: Concise review: The involvement of SOX2 in direct reprogramming of induced neural stem/precursor cells. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2:579–583. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Z, Chi L, Fang Y, Liu L and Zhang X: Specific expression pattern of a novel Otx2 splicing variant during neural differentiation. Gene. 523:33–38. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang X, Huang CT, Chen J, Pankratz MT, Xi J, Li J, Yang Y, Lavaute TM, Li XJ, Ayala M, et al: Pax6 is a human neuroectoderm cell fate determinant. Cell Stem Cell. 7:90–100. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Berezovsky AD, Poisson LM, Cherba D, Webb CP, Transou AD, Lemke NW, Hong X, Hasselbach LA, Irtenkauf SM, Mikkelsen T and deCarvalho AC: Sox2 promotes malignancy in glioblastoma by regulating plasticity and astrocytic differentiation. Neoplasia. 16:193–206.e25. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ellis P, Fagan BM, Magness ST, Hutton S, Taranova O, Hayashi S, McMahon A, Rao M and Pevny L: SOX2, a persistent marker for multipotential neural stem cells derived from embryonic stem cells, the embryo or the adult. Dev Neurosci. 26:148–165. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oppel F, Müller N, Schackert G, Hendruschk S, Martin D, Geiger KD and Temme A: SOX2-RNAi attenuates S-phase entry and induces RhoA-dependent switch to protease-independent amoeboid migration in human glioma cells. Mol Cancer. 10:1372011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Alonso MM, Diez-Valle R, Manterola L, Rubio A, Liu D, Cortes-Santiago N, Urquiza L, Jauregi P, Lopez de Munain A, Sampron N, et al: Genetic and epigenetic modifications of Sox2 contribute to the invasive phenotype of malignant gliomas. PLoS One. 6:e267402011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fang X, Yoon JG, Li L, Yu W, Shao J, Hua D, Zheng S, Hood L, Goodlett DR, Foltz G and Lin B: The SOX2 response program in glioblastoma multiforme: An integrated ChIP-seq, expression microarray, and microRNA analysis. BMC Genomics. 12:112011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cox JL, Wilder PJ, Desler M and Rizzino A: Elevating SOX2 levels deleteriously affects the growth of medulloblastoma and glioblastoma cells. PLoS One. 7:e440872012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Skalli O, Wilhelmsson U, Orndahl C, Fekete B, Malmgren K, Rydenhag B and Pekny M: Astrocytoma grade IV (glioblastoma multiforme) displays 3 subtypes with unique expression profiles of intermediate filament proteins. Hum Pathol. 44:2081–2088. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Irshad K, Mohapatra SK, Srivastava C, Garg H, Mishra S, Dikshit B, Sarkar C, Gupta D, Chandra PS, Chattopadhyay P, et al: A combined gene signature of hypoxia and notch pathway in human glioblastoma and its prognostic relevance. PLoS One. 10:e01182012015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kang TW, Choi SW, Yang SR, Shin TH, Kim HS, Yu KR, Hong IS, Ro S, Cho JM and Kang KS: Growth arrest and forced differentiation of human primary glioblastoma multiforme by a novel small molecule. Sci Rep. 4:55462014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang XQ and Zhang SC: Differentiation of neural precursors and dopaminergic neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 584:355–366. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hu BY, Weick JP, Yu J, Ma LX, Zhang XQ, Thomson JA and Zhang SC: Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:4335–4340. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |