Open Access

Smokeless tobacco extract inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in oral mucous fibroblasts

  • Authors:
    • Lei Li
    • Xiaoqing Zhou
    • Yanran Wang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 2, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9252
  • Pages: 5066-5074
  • Copyright: © Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The consumption of smokeless tobacco extract (STE) is growing rapidly, and it has been implicated in several human diseases including diabetes, inflammation and a number of types of cancer. The toxicity of STE requires evaluation, as it is known to induce numerous public health issues. To investigate whether STE serves a role in cultured human oral mucosa fibroblasts (hOMFs), the present study examined HOMF morphology with inverted microscopy and immunofluorescence staining. The cell viability was measured with MTT assays, which detected the cell apoptosis rate via flow cytometry. The activities of reactive oxygen species (ROS), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) were measured via flow cytometry and commercial kits, subsequent to exposing the cells to various concentrations of STE. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analyses were used to demonstrate that the mRNA and the protein expression levels of cell cycle‑associated genes (cyclin‑dependent kinase inhibitor 1 and cyclin D1), apoptosis‑associated genes [B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‑2) and Bcl‑2‑associatied X protein], tumor protein (p53), nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF‑κB)‑transcription factor (p65) signaling pathways, NF‑E2‑related factor 2 (Nrf2), heme oxygenase‑1 (HO‑1) and NAD(P)H: quinoneoxidoreductase1 (NQO1).The results indicated that the hOMF cells were positive for cytokeratin staining. STE induced G1‑S cell cycle progression and cell apoptosis by regulating the cell cycle or apoptosis‑associated proteins. STE treatment increased the concentrations of ROS and MDA, and decreased the concentrations of SOD and CAT. STE unregulated phosphorylated‑p53, NF‑κB p65, Nrf2, HO‑1, and NQO1 expression levels in the hOMF cells. The present study demonstrated that STE appears to promote oral disease.

Introduction

Smokeless tobacco (ST) has been used over centuries by large numbers of the global population. ST is a type of tobacco that is consumed orally or nasally, without burning the product (1,2). ST products include moist snuff (finely ground or shredded tobacco applied to the gum or tongue), dry snuff (powdered tobacco inhaled nasally) and chewing or sucking tobacco (3). The consumption of ST products has been popular in several Asian countries including India and Pakistan, and in Africa, northern Europe and the United States of America (1,4). The negative health consequences of ST remain controversial, although there is increasing evidence demonstrating that >30 compounds within ST exhibit cancer-inducing activities, including tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and formaldehyde (5,6). Previous studies have demonstrated that the chemical components in ST were associated with an increased risk of a number of types of cancer, including oral, or oropharyngeal and esophageal cancer (710). N-nitrosonornicotine and 4-methyl-N-nitrosamino-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanoneare2principal human carcinogens of TSNAs (11,12). These compounds were identified in the urine of ST users, and studies involving rats demonstrated that they may induce tumorigenesis in the pancreas, esophagus and oral cavity (1315).

ST consumption has been identified to generate free radicals and result in increased oxidative stress, which destroys the homeostasis between pro- and antioxidants (16). Cellular DNA is damaged by reactive oxygen metabolites (ROMs), including superoxide anions, malondialdehyde and nitric oxide, and therefore an imbalance between pro- and antioxidants is directly associated with carcinogenesis (16,17). The ability to eliminate ROMs using the antioxidant enzyme system is critically important for smokers (18). Active smokers and tobacco users have been demonstrated to exhibit the lowest levels of protective antioxidants in the general population, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase and catalase (CAT) (19,20).

ST extracts (STE) are not only absorbed locally, but may also enter the systemic circulation (21,22). Evidence has demonstrated the effects of STE in several biological processes, including inflammation, antioxidant defense and cell apoptosis (23,24). Block et al (20) revealed the toxicity of chronic STE exposure for 184 days in male and female rats, where the animals experienced decreased body weight and a moderate toxic effect on a number of organs including the stomach, liver, kidneys, esophagus and lungs. The exact mechanisms of STE in human diseases remain unknown.

In order to evaluate the toxicity of STE on oral mucous fibroblasts, the present study first identified human oral mucosa fibroblasts (hOMF) cells by detecting cytokeratin expression. The effects of STE on the rates of proliferation and apoptosis of hOMF cells were then investigated by a series of experiments, including MTT assays, reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blot analysis. The present study analyzed the effect of the STE on the oxidative status of hOMF cells by measuring the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), MDA, SOD and CAT following of exposure of the cells to a range of concentrations of STE (0, 200, 400 and 800 µg/ml). It was identified that the tumor protein 53 (p53) and nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB)-transcription factor p65 (p65) signaling pathways were involved in the effects of STE on cell proliferation and apoptosis.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and treatment

The hOMF cells and human normal fibroblast (NF) cells were purchased from Ai Yan Shanghai Biological Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in 95% humidity incubator with 5% CO2. After culturing, the cellular morphology of the hOMF cells was observed and images were captured using fluorescence microscope (×200 magnification; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in four randomly selected fields of view.

The hOMF cells were digested, centrifuged in 500 × g at 37°C for 5 min and seeded into plastic culture dishes (35 mm) with 5.0×105 cells/well for 48 h. The cells were then treated with STE (0, 200, 400 and 800 µg/ml) for 24, 48 and 72 h at 37°C. The treated cells were then used for the subsequent experiments.

RT-qPCR assay

Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol® reagent (Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. The total RNA was reverse transcribed into the first-strand cDNAs via a RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. The thermocycler conditions were as follows: 85°C for 15 min, 4°C for 10 min. The mRNA expression levels of the GAPDH and the target genes were evaluated with a qPCR assay using a SYBR GREEN PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and an ABI 7500 Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 min, (denaturation: 95°C for 30 sec; annealing: 55°C for 30 sec; elongation: 72°C for 25 sec) for 30 cycles, extending: 72°C for 30 sec. The data was analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCq method (25). The relative mRNA expression levels were normalized to GAPDH. The primers for the target genes and GAPDH are summarized in Table I.

Table I.

Primer sequences for reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis.

Table I.

Primer sequences for reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis.

GenePrimer sequences
GAPDHForward: 5′-TATGATGATATCAAGAGGGTAGT-3′
Reverse: 5′-TGTATCCAAACTCATTGTCATAC-3′
p21Forward: 5′-CTGGTGACTCTCAGGGTCGAA-3′
Reverse: 5′-GGATTAGGGCTTCCTCTTGGA-3′
Cyclin D1Forward: 5′-GCTGCTCCTGGTGAACAAGC-3
Reverse: 5′-TTGCGTCTCAGCTCAGGGAC-3
BaxForward: 5′-CAGCTCTGAGCAGATCATGAAGACA-3′
Reverse: 5′-GCCCATCTTCTTCCAGATGGTGAGC-3′
Bcl-2Forward: 5′-ACTTGTGGCCCAGATAGGCACCCAG-3′
Reverse: 5′-CGACTTCGCCGAGATGTCCAGCCAG-3′
p53Forward: 5′-CAGCGTGATGATGGTAAGGA-3′
Reverse: 5′-GCGTTGCTCTGATGGTGA-3′
NF-κB p65Forward: 5′-ACGATCTGTTTCCCCTCATCT-3′
Reverse: 5′-TGCTTCTCTCCCCAGGAATA-3′
Nrf2Forward: 5′-TACTCCCAGGTTGCCCACA-3′
Reverse: 5′-CATCTACAAACGGGAATGTCTGC-3′
HO-1Forward: 5′-CACGCATATACCCGCTACCT-3′
Reverse: 5′-AAGGCGGTCTTAGCCTCTTC-3′
NQO1Forward: 5′-CATTCTGAAAGGCTGGTTTGA-3′
Reverse: 5′-CTAGCTTTGATCTGGTTGTCAG-3′

[i] p21, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1; Bcl-2, B cell lymphoma 2; Bax, Bcl-2-associated X protein; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells, p65, transcription factor p65; p53, tumor protein 53; Nrf2, Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2; HO-1, Hemeoxygenase 1; NQO1, NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1.

Western blot analysis

The hOMF cells were lysed with a radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with a Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The protein concentrations were quantified with a BCA protein assay kit (Qcbio Science Technologies Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The proteins (30 µg) were separated with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The proteins were then transferred on to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), and TBST buffer containing 5% skim milk was used to block the membranes at room temperature for 90 min. The primary antibodies were incubated with the membranes overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-mouse; cat. no., SC-2005; anti-rabbit, cat. no., SC-2004; dilution: 1:700, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) at room temperature for 60 min and then incubation with a chemiluminescence substrate (Amersham; GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) at room temperature for 2 min. The results were analyzed with an ECL system (Amersham; GE Healthcare). Images were captured by the LAS-3000 imaging system (FUJIFILM, Tokyo, Japan) and Multi Gauge Version 2.0 software (FUJIFILM). The primary antibodies used were as follows: Anti-GAPDH (cat. no., SC-47724, dilution, 1:2,000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1 (p21; dilution, 1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; cat. no., ab54562); anti-cyclin D1 (dilution, 1:1,000, Abcam; cat.no, ab134175); anti-B cell-lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2)-associated X protein (Bax; dilution, 1:1,000; Abcam; cat.no. ab32503); anti-Bcl-2 (dilution, 1:1,000; Abcam; cat. no., ab32124); anti-p53 (dilution, 1:100; Abcam; cat. no., ab28); anti-phosphorylated (p)-p53 (dilution, 1:500; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA; cat. no., 9284); anti-NF-κB p65 (dilution, 1: 1,000, Abcam, cat. no., ab76026); anti-Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2; dilution, 1:1,000; Abcam; cat. no., ab76026); anti-Hemeoxygenase 1 (HO-1; dilution, 1:1,000; Abcam; cat. no., ab13248); and anti-NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (NQO1; dilution, 1:1,000; Abcam; cat. no., ab28947).

Cell viability assay

The treated hOMF cells were seeded in 96-well plates with 100 µl DMEM medium (10% FBS) at a density of 2×103 cells/well. They were cultured at 5% CO2 for 48 h at 37°C. A total of 20 µl MTT solution (5 mg/ml) was added into each well. The cells were then incubated for 4 h at 37°C. A total of 200 µl dimethyl sulfoxide was then added into each well for 10 min at room temperature, which dissolved the formazan product. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm with an Elx800 Reader (Bio-Tek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).

Immunofluorescence assay

The treated hOMF cells (1×106 cells/ml) were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde in PBS at room temperature for 20 min. Triton X-100 (0.2%) solutions in PBS were used for permeabilizing cells at room temperature for 10 min. 5% BSA (Bovogen Biologicals, Keilor East, VIC, Australia) was used for blocking cells at room temperature for 20 min. The cells were then incubated with cytokeratin antibody (cat. no. ab9377, dilution: 1:100; Abcam) overnight at 4°C. The goat-anti-rabbit-Alexa 594-conjugated secondary antibody (cat. no. R37117, dilution: 1:6,000; Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was then incubated with the treated coverslips for 1 h at room temperature. The treated coverslips were then incubated with DAPI (Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 10 min at room temperature. The images were obtained with a fluorescence microscope (×400 magnification), in four fields of view.

Flow cytometric analysis

A cell cycle analysis was performed with propidium iodide (PI; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) staining, as described previously (26,27). The cells were collected and fixed in 70% (v/v) ethanol (cat. no. 5054.2; Carl Roth GmbH & Co., KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) for 15 min at room temperature, then washed with PBS and suspended in a PI staining solution (50 mg/l; Biolegend, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA; cat. no. 421301) supplemented with 0.1% Triton X-100 and Ribonuclease A (0.25 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). The cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 min and then the cell fluorescence was measured with a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). The cell cycle analysis was performed with ModFit LT 2.0 software (Verity SoftwareHouse, Topsham, ME, USA).

The cell apoptosis assay was performed with an Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/PI apoptosis detection kit (BestBio, Co., Shanghai, China) as described previously (28). The treated hOMF cells (1×106 cells/ml) were re-suspended with a1X binding buffer (100 µl), and then double-stained with 20 µg/ml Annexin V-FITC and 50 µg/ml PI for 15 min at room temperature. Cell apoptosis levels were then detected by flow cytometry with version 5.1 Cell Quest Pro software (BD FACSCalibur, San Jose, CA, USA).

Flow cytometry for ROS expression

ROS levels were detected with the membrane-permeable fluorescent probes 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA), as described previously (29). The treated hOMF cells (1×106 cells/ml) were incubated with 2.5 mmol/l DCFH-DA at 37°C for 25 min. The cells were then washed with PBS, digested with 0.25% trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), treated with DCFH-DA at 37°C for 25 min, and finally detected by flow cytometry with version 5.1 Cell Quest Pro software. The fluorescence intensity was measured, and the average was calculated using at least 3 replicates.

SOD, MDA and CAT expression levels

SOD assay kit (cat, no. A001-3), MDA assay kit (cat, no. A003-1) and CAT assay kit (cat, no. A007-2) were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). SOD, MDA and CAT activities (30,31) were based on a colorimetric method and used in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol, as described previously (3032). The colorimetric reactions were determined at 450 and 405 nm using UV-5800H spectrophotometer (Metash Instruments, Shanghai, China).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. A one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's post-hoc tests were performed to compare the differences between each group. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Morphology and cytokeratin of hOMF cells are identified

The results indicated that the hOMF cells exhibited a typical morphology (Fig. 1A). The cytokeratin level was detected with immunofluorescence staining in the hOMF and NF cells. It was identified that cytokeratin was expressed in the hOMF cells, but not in the NF cells (Fig. 1B).

Treatment with STE inhibits cell viability

The effects of STE on the proliferation of hOMF cells were determined by culturing the hOMF cells with specified concentrations of STE (0, 200, 400 or 800 µg/ml) for 24, 48 and 72 h. MTT assays was performed to analyze the viability rate. It was identified that the STE inhibited the viability HOMF cells in dose- and a time-dependent manners (Fig. 2A).

Treatment with STE induces cycle progression of hOMF cells

The cell cycle distribution was additionally analyzed via flow cytometry with PI staining. The results revealed that the average percentages of cells in G1 phase were 67.03, 55.31, 49.69 and 46.50% at 0, 200, 400 and 800 µg/ml STE respectively. The average percentages of cells in the S phase were 11.37, 29.50, 33.38 and 35.28% in the hOMF cells that were treated with 0, 200, 400 and 800 µg/ml STE, (Fig. 2B). In comparison with the control group (STE, 0 µg/ml), STE treatment decreased the percentage of cells in the G1 phase, and increased the percentage of cells in the S phase at 200, 400 and 800 µg/ml STE (Fig. 2C). The results indicated that the G1-S cell cycle progression was induced by the STE in the hOMF cells. The mRNA and the protein expression levels of p21 and cyclin D1 were evaluated by RT-qPCR and western blot analysis. Fig. 2D indicates that STE treatment upregulated p21 expression and downregulated cyclin D1 expression in a concentration-dependent manner. It was also identified that the protein expression levels of p21 were increased and the protein expression levels of cyclin D1 were decreased in the STE treatment group (STE, 0 µg/ml; Fig. 2E).

Treatment with STE promotes the apoptosis ability of hOMF cells

The present study analyzed the effects of the STE on apoptosis via flow cytometry (Fig. 3A), and the results indicated that the apoptotic indexes of the control (0 µg/ml) and STE treatment groups (200, 400 and 800 µg/ml) were 4.43, 7.21, 8.93 and 16.58%, respectively (Fig. 3B). The expression levels of the apoptosis-associated genes (Bax and Bcl-2) were then measured with RT-qPCR and western blot analysis. The results indicated that Bax expression levels were increased and the Bcl-2 levels were decreased in the hOMF cells treated with STE in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3C and D).

STE increases the concentrations of ROS and MDA and decreases the concentrations of SOD and CAT

There have been several previous studies demonstrating that ROS serves a significant role in apoptosis induction under physiological and pathological conditions (33,34). In the present study, the concentration of ROS was analyzed with a flow cytometer with DCFH-DA fluorescent probe in the hOMF cells treated with STE (0, 200, 400 and 800 µg/ml) for 48 h. The results indicated significant differences in the ROS levels among the STE treatment and the control (STE, 0 µg/ml) groups (Fig. 4A). The concentration of ROS was significantly increased in the STE treatment groups (Fig. 4B). The results indicated that the SOD (Fig. 4C) and the CAT (Fig. 4D) activity levels were significantly decreased compared with 0 µg/ml. The MDA activity level was significantly increased in the STE treatment group, compared with 0 µg/ml (Fig. 4E).

STE upregulates p-p53, NF-κB p65, Nrf2, HO-1, and NQO1 expression levels in the hOMF cells

The regulatory effects of STE treatment were investigated by detecting the expression levels of p53, NF-κB p65, Nrf2, HO-1, and NQO1 via RT-qPCR and western blot analysis in hOMF cells treated with the STE (0, 200, 400 and 800 µg/ml) for 48 h. As demonstrated in Fig. 5A, the expression level of p-p53 was increased in the STE treatment group compared with 0 µg/ml. The results also indicated that STE treatment increased the expression level of NF-κB p65 in the hOMF cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5B). The Nrf2, HO-1 and NQO1 expression levels were upregulated in the STE treatment group compared with 0 µg/ml (Fig. 5C).

Discussion

The use of tobacco remains a major public health concern in a number of countries, due to its established associations with a number of diseases and nicotine addiction (35,36). The nicotine within tobacco is the primary psychoactive substance, and the major source of alkaloids (37,38). Previous studies have identified that tobacco contains a variety of toxic substances, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nitrosamines, nicotine, formaldehyde and hydrogen (39). The use of general tobacco may result in a variety of oral diseases, including oral inflammation, oral injury and Snuff dipper's lesions (40,41). Previous studies also have indicated that smokeless tobacco causes other diseases, including peripheral vascular disease, cardiovascular disease, hypertension and increased fetal morbidity and mortality (42). In the present study, the effect of STE on hOMF cells over a range of concentrations and time intervals was explored, in order to identify the potential pathogenic mechanism of STE.

Previous studies have indicated that p21 was present in several biological progresses and served as a negative regulator of cell proliferation (43). An association between poor prognosis and an accumulation of nuclear p21 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) was demonstrated (44). A number of studies also indicated that STE affected the cell proliferation and cell cycle in OSCC (45,46). STE promoted NF-κB expression and the expression levels of cell cycle-associated proteins p53 and p21 in premalignant lesions in the oral cavity (47,48). The results of the present study indicated that STE significantly inhibited cell proliferation and induced G1-S cell cycle progression in the hOMF cells. It was also identified that STE increased p21 expression and decreased cyclin D1 expression in the hOMF cells.

Apoptosis is a gene-controlled cell-independent death process, which is an important mechanism for the maintenance of a stable internal environment. Apoptosis serves an important role of normal biological function (49,50). Previous studies have indicated that STE may lead to the apoptosis of multiple cell types, including hamster cheek pouch cells, Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells and oral keratinocytes (5154). Bcl-2 and Bax proteins are the 2 primary members of apoptosis pathway (55). Bcl-2 serves an anti-apoptotic role, and the Bax protein is similar to the Bcl-2 in structure, but serves an antagonistic role to that of Bcl-2 (56). The molecular mechanisms of STE-induced apoptosis are not fully understood in hOMF cells. The present study identified that the percentage of apoptotic cells was significantly increased subsequent to treatment of the hOMF cells with STE in a dose dependent manner. In addition, Bax expression levels were increased and Bcl-2 levels were decreased in the hOMF cells treated with STE in a dose-dependent manner. The present study indicated that the ROS were chemically reactive molecules containing oxygen, which may induce apoptosis. The results of the present study also revealed that STE increased the concentrations of ROS, and that ROS was closely associated with MDA, SOD and CAT.

NF-κB is a nuclear transcription factor that regulates the expression of various genes that are critical for the regulation of apoptosis, inflammation, viral replication, tumorigenesis and various autoimmune diseases (57). Nrf2 is a transcription factor activated by oxidative stress that binds to the antioxidant response element (ARE) (58). ARE-associated genes may participate in the maintenance of redox homeostasis through the activation of proteins, including HO-1 and NQO1 (58). In the present study, it was identified that STE increased the expression level of NF-κB p65 in the hOMF cells in a dose-dependent manner, and the levels of Nrf2, HO-1 and NQO1 expression were upregulated in the STE treatment group.

In the present study, the potential roles that STE serves in proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis of hOMF cells were identified. The results indicated that STE increased the rate of cell cycle progression and apoptosis via cell cycle- and apoptosis-associated proteins. STE increased the concentrations of ROS and MDA, decreased the concentrations of SOD and CAT and upregulatedp-p53, NF-κB, p65, Nrf2, HO-1 and NQO1 expression levels in hOMF cells.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

LL and XZ designed the experimental scheme. YW analyzed and interpreted data. LL was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Boffetta P, Hecht S, Gray N, Gupta P and Straif K: Smokeless tobacco and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 9:667–675. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Chagué F, Guenancia C, Gudjoncik A, Moreau D, Cottin Y and Zeller M: Smokeless tobacco, sport and the heart. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 108:75–83. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

England LJ, Kim SY, Tomar SL, Ray CS, Gupta PC, Eissenberg T, Cnattingius S, Bernert JT, Tita AT, Winn DM, et al: Non-cigarette tobacco use among women and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 89:454–464. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Bates C, Fagerström K, Jarvis MJ, Kunze M, McNeill A and Ramström L: European Union policy on smokeless tobacco: A statement in favour of evidence based regulation for public health. Tob Control. 12:360–367. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

McAdam K, Kimpton H, Vas C, Rushforth D, Porter A and Rodu B: The acrylamide content of smokeless tobacco products. Chem Cent J. 9:562015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Janbaz KH, Qadir MI, Basser HT, Bokhari TH and Ahmad B: Risk for oral cancer from smokeless tobacco. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 18:160–164. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Lee CH, Lee JM, Wu DC, Hsu HK, Kao EL, Huang HL, Wang TN, Huang MC and Wu MT: Independent and combined effects of alcohol intake, tobacco smoking and betel quid chewing on the risk of esophageal cancer in Taiwan. Int J Cancer. 113:475–482. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Znaor A, Brennan P, Gajalakshmi V, Mathew A, Shanta V, Varghese C and Boffetta P: Independent and combined effects of tobacco smoking, chewing and alcohol drinking on the risk of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal cancers in Indian men. Int J Cancer. 105:681–686. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Brinton LA, Blot WJ, Becker JA, Winn DM, Browder JP, Farmer JC Jr and Fraumeni JF Jr: A case-control study of cancers of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Am J Epidemiol. 119:896–906. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Johansson SL, Hirsch JM, Larsson PA, Saidi J and Osterdahl BG: Snuff-induced carcinogenesis: Effect of snuff in rats initiated with 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide. Cancer Res. 49:3063–3069. 1989.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Lam E, Kelley E, Martin S and Buettner G: Tobacco xenobiotics release nitric oxide. Tob Induc Dis. 1:207–211. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Stich HF, Parida BB and Brunnemann KD: Localized formation of micronuclei in the oral mucosa and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in the saliva of ‘reverse’ smokers, Khaini-tobacco chewers and gudakhu users. Int J Cancer. 50:172–176. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Hecht SS, Rivenson A, Braley J, DiBello J, Adams JD and Hoffmann D: Induction of oral cavity tumors in F344 rats by tobacco-specific nitrosamines and snuff. Cancer Res. 46:4162–4166. 1986.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Rivenson A, Hoffmann D, Prokopczyk B, Amin S and Hecht SS: Induction of lung and exocrine pancreas tumors in F344 rats by tobacco-specific and Areca-derived N-nitrosamines. Cancer Res. 48:6912–6917. 1988.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Hecht SS: Biochemistry, biology, and carcinogenicity of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines. Chem Res Toxicol. 11:559–603. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Patel BP, Rawal UM, Shah PM, Prajapati JA, Rawal RM, Dave TK and Patel PS: Study of tobacco habits and alterations in enzymatic antioxidant system in oral cancer. Oncology. 68:511–519. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Naga Sirisha CV and Manohar RM: Study of antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase levels in tobacco chewers and smokers: A pilot study. J Cancer Res Ther. 9:210–214. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Sugiura T, Dohi Y, Takase H, Yamashita S, Fujii S and Ohte N: Oxidative stress is closely associated with increased arterial stiffness, especially in aged male smokers without previous cardiovascular events: A cross-sectional study. J Atheroscler Thromb. 24:1186–1198. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Ermis B, Ors R, Yildirim A, Tastekin A, Kardas F and Akcay F: Influence of smoking on maternal and neonatal serum malondialdehyde, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase levels. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 34:405–409. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Block G, Dietrich M, Norkus EP, Morrow JD, Hudes M, Caan B and Packer L: Factors associated with oxidative stress in human populations. Am J Epidemiol. 156:274–285. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Harris AC, Tally L, Schmidt CE, Muelken P, Stepanov I, Saha S, Vogel RI and LeSage MG: Animal models to assess the abuse liability of tobacco products: Effects of smokeless tobacco extracts on intracranial self-stimulation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 147:60–67. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Yu C, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Zong Y, Chen Y, Du X, Chen J, Feng S, Hu J, Cui S and Lu G: Toxicity of smokeless tobacco extract after 184-day repeated oral administration in rats. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13(pii): E2812016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Avti PK, Vaiphei K, Pathak CM and Khanduja KL: Involvement of various molecular events in cellular injury induced by smokeless tobacco. Chem Res Toxicol. 23:1163–1174. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Avti PK, Kumar S, Pathak CM, Vaiphei K and Khanduja KL: Smokeless tobacco impairs the antioxidant defense in liver, lung, and kidney of rats. Toxicol Sci. 89:547–553. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Li CJ: Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle and specific cell synchronization with butyrate. Methods Mol Biol. 1524:149–159. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Filby A, Day W, Purewal S and Martinez-Martin N: The analysis of cell cycle, proliferation, and asymmetric cell division by imaging flow cytometry. Methods Mol Biol. 1389:71–95. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Zhang W and Liang Z: Comparison between annexin V-FITC/PI and Hoechst33342/PI double stainings in the detection of apoptosis by flow cytometry. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 30:1209–1212. 2014.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

29 

Shen Y, Guo W, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Zhong L and Zhu Y: Protective effects of hydrogen sulfide in hypoxic human umbilical vein endothelial cells: A possible mitochondria-dependent pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 14:13093–13108. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

McCord JM and Fridovich I: Superoxide dismutase. An enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J Biol Chem. 244:6049–6055. 1969.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Archbald RM: Enzymatic methods in amino acid analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 47:181–186. 1946. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Cheng C, Yi J, Wang R, Cheng L, Wang Z and Lu W: Protection of Spleen Tissue of γ-ray irradiated mice against immunosuppressive and oxidative effects of radiation by adenosine 5′-monophosphate. Int J Mol Sci. 19(pii): E12732018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Simon HU, Haj-Yehia A and Levi-Schaffer F: Role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in apoptosis induction. Apoptosis. 5:415–418. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Yee C, Yang W and Hekimi S: The intrinsic apoptosis pathway mediates the pro-longevity response to mitochondrial ROS in C. elegans. Cell. 157:897–909. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Napierala M and Florek E: Historical trends in prevalence of tobacco smoking among women. Przegl Lek. 72:155–157. 2015.(In Polish). PubMed/NCBI

36 

Weintraub JM and Hamilton WL: Trends in prevalence of current smoking, Massachusetts and states without tobacco control programmes, 1990 to 1999. Tob Control. 11 Suppl 2:ii8–ii13. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

37 

Corrigall WA: Nicotine self-administration in animals as a dependence model. Nicotine Tob Res. 1:11–20. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Rose JE and Corrigall WA: Nicotine self-administration in animals and humans: Similarities and differences. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 130:28–40. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Schick SF, Farraro KF, Perrino C, Sleiman M, van de Vossenberg G, Trinh MP, Hammond SK, Jenkins BM and Balmes J: Thirdhand cigarette smoke in an experimental chamber: Evidence of surface deposition of nicotine, nitrosamines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and de novo formation of NNK. Tob Control. 23:152–159. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Furukawa S, Ueno M and Kawaguchi Y: Influence of tobacco on dental and oral diseases. Nihon Rinsho. 71:459–463. 2013.(In Japanese). PubMed/NCBI

41 

Didilescu A: Tobacco induced oral diseases. Pneumologia. 49:300–303. 2000.(In Romanian). PubMed/NCBI

42 

Critchley JA and Unal B: Health effects associated with smokeless tobacco: A systematic review. Thorax. 58:435–443. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Gartel AL, Serfas MS and Tyner AL: p21-negative regulator of the cell cycle. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 213:138–149. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Huang KJ, Kuo CH, Chen SH, Lin CY and Lee YR: Honokiol inhibits in vitro and in vivo growth of oral squamous cell carcinoma through induction of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and autophagy. J Cell Mol Med. 22:1894–1908. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Mishra R and Das BR: Activation of STAT 5-cyclin D1 pathway in chewing tobacco mediated oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Biol Rep. 32:159–166. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Mishra R and Das BR: Cyclin D1 expression and its possible regulation in chewing tobacco mediated oral squamous cell carcinoma progression. Arch Oral Biol. 54:917–923. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Rohatgi N, Kaur J, Srivastava A and Ralhan R: Smokeless tobacco (khaini) extracts modulate gene expression in epithelial cell culture from an oral hyperplasia. Oral Oncol. 41:806–820. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Sawhney M, Rohatgi N, Kaur J, Shishodia S, Sethi G, Gupta SD, Deo SV, Shukla NK, Aggarwal BB and Ralhan R: Expression of NF-kappaB parallels COX-2 expression in oral precancer and cancer: Association with smokeless tobacco. Int J Cancer. 120:2545–2556. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Jiang P and Yue Y: Human papillomavirus oncoproteins and apoptosis (Review). Exp Ther Med. 7:3–7. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Ni Nyoman AD and Lüder CG: Apoptosis-like cell death pathways in the unicellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii following treatment with apoptosis inducers and chemotherapeutic agents: A proof-of-concept study. Apoptosis. 18:664–680. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Bagchi M, Balmoori J, Bagchi D, Ray SD, Kuszynski C and Stohs SJ: Smokeless tobacco, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and antioxidants in human oral keratinocytes. Free Radic Biol Med. 26:992–1000. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Jenson HB, Baillargeon J, Heard P and Moyer MP: Effects of smokeless tobacco and tumor promoters on cell population growth and apoptosis of B lymphocytes infected with epstein-barr virus types 1 and 2. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 160:171–182. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Mangipudy RS and Vishwanatha JK: Role of nitric oxide in the induction of apoptosis by smokeless tobacco extract. Mol Cell Biochem. 200:51–57. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Banerjee AG, Gopalakrishnan VK and Vishwanatha JK: Inhibition of nitric oxide-induced apoptosis by nicotine in oral epithelial cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 305:113–121. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Kuwana T and Newmeyer DD: Bcl-2-family proteins and the role of mitochondria in apoptosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 15:691–699. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Breckenridge DG and Xue D: Regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilization by BCL-2 family proteins and caspases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 16:647–652. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Panday A, Inda ME, Bagam P, Sahoo MK, Osorio D and Batra S: Transcription factor NF-κB: An update on intervention strategies. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 64:463–483. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Jaiswal AK: Nrf2 signaling in coordinated activation of antioxidant gene expression. Free Radic Biol Med. 36:1199–1207. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2018
Volume 16 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li L, Zhou X and Wang Y: Smokeless tobacco extract inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in oral mucous fibroblasts. Oncol Lett 16: 5066-5074, 2018.
APA
Li, L., Zhou, X., & Wang, Y. (2018). Smokeless tobacco extract inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in oral mucous fibroblasts. Oncology Letters, 16, 5066-5074. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9252
MLA
Li, L., Zhou, X., Wang, Y."Smokeless tobacco extract inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in oral mucous fibroblasts". Oncology Letters 16.4 (2018): 5066-5074.
Chicago
Li, L., Zhou, X., Wang, Y."Smokeless tobacco extract inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in oral mucous fibroblasts". Oncology Letters 16, no. 4 (2018): 5066-5074. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9252