Long non‑coding RNA‑neighboring enhancer of FOXA2 inhibits the migration and invasion of small cell lung carcinoma cells by downregulating transforming growth factor‑β1
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 15, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10152
- Pages: 4969-4975
-
Copyright: © Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Tumor metastasis is the principal reason for poor survival in patients with cancer (1), and its treatment and prevention are particularly challenging (2). Lung cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancer types, and is the leading cause of mortality among males, and the second leading cause among females (3). A considerable number of patients with lung cancer are diagnosed at the late stages of the disease, and with existing tumor metastasis, their prognosis is poor (3). The majority of lung cancer studies have focused on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (4). SCLC is an aggressive, highly metastasizing and frequently lethal type of lung cancer, yet it accounts for only ~15% of all cases of lung cancer (5). At present, studies on SCLC are limited in number.
Through its role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), activation of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) pathway is associated with metastasis in a number of malignancies (6). The tumor suppressive and oncogenic roles of TGF-β have been extensively investigated in different types of lung cancer (7,8). TGF-β signaling inhibits cell proliferation at the early stages of tumor initiation (7,8). By contrast, activation of TGF-β signaling promotes tumor metastasis at the late stages of cancer development. The actions of TGF-β may be mediated by interactions with long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) (9), a group of ncRNAs composed of >200 nucleotides (10). A growing body of literature has illustrated that lncRNAs are critical in human diseases (10). lncRNA-neighboring enhancer of FOXA2 (NEF) is a recently identified tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma, but with unknown functionality in other cancer types (11). In the present study, lncRNA-NEF inhibited the migration and invasion of SCLC cells, possibly as a result of TGF-β pathway inhibition.
Materials and methods
Patients
A total of 134 patients with SCLC were diagnosed and treated in The First People's Hospital of Tianmen City (Tianmen, Hubei, China) between May 2015 and January 2018. Among those patients, 46 were included in the present study according to pre-determined exclusion and inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Patients diagnosed using fine-needle lung biopsies; ii) patients diagnosed and treated for the first time; and iii) patients willing to participate. Exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Patients with other malignancies; ii) patients with chronic lung diseases; iii) patients >70 years of age; and iv) patients who had previously received treatment for lung cancer. The patient group included 29 males and 17 females (age range, 23–68 years; mean age, 45.5±5.6 years), and all patients were between cancer stages IIIA and IVB (as defined by The American Joint Committee on Cancer) (12). A total of 98 individuals concurrently received lung biopsies in The First People's Hospital of Tianmen City to detect potential lung lesions; 32 of these individuals tested negative for lung lesions, and were recruited as the control group consisting of 18 males and 14 females (age range, 26–69 years; mean age, 46.6±6.1 years). There were no significant differences in age and sex between the two groups. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First People's Hospital of Tianmen City, and all patients provided written informed consent.
Lung biopsies and preparation of plasma
Lung biopsies of all subjects were obtained from the specimen library of The First People's Hospital of Tianmen City. Blood (10 ml) was extracted in the morning prior to breakfast from the elbow vein of each subject. Blood was used to prepare plasma through centrifugation at 1,200 × g for 15 min at room temperature.
Cell lines, culture and transfection
The human SCLC cell lines, SHP-77 [American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) CRL-2195™] and NCI-H69 [H69] (ATCC HTB-119™) were purchased from the ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were cultured with ATCC-formulated RPMI-1640 Medium (cat. no. 30-2001; ATCC) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; cat. no. 30–2020; ATCC) at 37°C with 5% CO2. Full-length lncRNA-NEF DNA (11) was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and inserted into the pIRSE2 vector (Clontech, Laboratories, Inc., Mountainview, CA, USA) to establish an lncRNA-NEF expression vector. Cells were cultured to 80–90% confluence and 5×105 cells were transfected with 10 mM vector using Lipofectamine 2000® reagent (cat. no. 11668-019; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Untransfected cells and cells transfected with empty vector were used as controls and further experiments were carried out at 24 h following transfection.
Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to extract total RNA from lung biopsy tissues, plasma and in vitro cultured cells. For TGF-β1 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) treatment, cells were treated with exogenous TGF-β1 at 5, 10, 20 and 50 ng/ml for 24 at 37°C after transfection before RNA extractions. The SuperScript IV Reverse Transcriptase kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to synthesize cDNA, and SYBR® Green Real-Time PCR Master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to conduct PCR using an ABI PRISM 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Rockford, IL, USA). The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 80 sec at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 22 sec at 95°C and 40 sec at 58°C. Primers used in the PCR were as follows: lncRNA-NEF forward, 5′-CTGCCGTCTTAAACCAACCC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCCCAAACAGCTCCTCAATT-3′; and β-actin forward, 5′-GACCTCTATGCCAACACAGT-3′ and reverse, 5′-AGTACTTGCGCTCAGGAGGA-3′. Data normalization was performed using the 2−ΔΔcq method (13), and the experiment was performed in triplicate.
Cell migration and invasion assays
Following transfection, an lncRNA-NEF expression rate of >200% was confirmed using RT-qPCR. Following transfection, for TGF-β1 treatment, cells were treated with 10 ng/ml exogenous TGF-β1 (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) for 24 h at 37°C prior to use. Cell migration and invasion were detected using Transwell cell migration and invasion kits (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Cell suspensions were prepared using RPMI-1640 medium (non-serum) to a final concentration of 5×104 cell/ml. For the migration assay, 5×103 cells in 0.1 ml cell suspension were added to the upper Transwell chamber, while the lower chamber was filled with RPMI containing 20% FBS. Cells were cultured for 6 h and the membranes were subsequently stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at room temperature for 20 min. The invasion assay was performed in the same manner, but the upper chamber was pre-coated with Matrigel (cat. no. 356234; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) prior to the addition of the cells. Stained cells were counted under an optical microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Western blotting
Cell lysis buffer (Clontech, Laboratories, Inc.,) was used to extract protein from in vitro-cultured cells, and the protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay. Protein samples were denatured and 20 µg protein per lane was separated using SDS-PAGE on a 10% gel. Following transfer, PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) were blocked with 5% skimmed milk at room temperature for 2 h, and incubated with rabbit anti-human primary antibodies against TGF-β1 (1:2,000; cat. no. ab92486, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and GAPDH (1:1,000; cat. no. ab9485, Abcam) overnight at 4°C. Subsequent to washing with PBS in triplicate at room temperature for 15 min per time, membranes were further incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody (1:1,000; cat. no. MBS435036; MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA) at room temperature for 2 h. ECL™ Prime Western Blotting System (ECL; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was used to develop the blots, and the relative expression level of TGF-β1 was normalized to GAPDH using Image J 1.51 software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Gene expression, cell migration and invasion data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and compared using the unpaired t-test (between two groups), or one-way analysis of variance followed by least significant difference test (among multiple groups). Associations between the plasma levels of lncRNA-NEF and the clinicopathological data of patients were analyzed using the χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Expression of lncRNA-NEF is downregulated in patients with SCLC compared with healthy controls
Expression level of lncRNA-NEF was detected in the lung tissue and plasma of patients with SCLC, and in healthy controls. As illustrated in Fig. 1, the expression levels of lncRNA-NEF were significantly lower in the lung tissue (Fig. 1A, P<0.05) and plasma (Fig. 1B, P<0.05) of patients with SCLC, compared with those of the healthy controls.
Downregulation of lncRNA-NEF distinguishes patients with SCLC from healthy controls
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of lncRNA-NEF in SCLC. For lncRNA-NEF expression in lung biopsies, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.8549, with a standard error of 0.04144 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.7737–0.9362 (Fig. 2A). For lncRNA-NEF expression in plasma, the AUC was 0.8309, with a standard error of 0.04755 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.7377–0.9241 (Fig. 2B).
Expression levels of lncRNA-NEF are associated with distant tumor metastasis, but not tumor size
Patients were divided into high and low expression groups according to the median relative expression level of lncRNA-NEF in lung biopsies (2.14) and plasma (2.02), respectively. Associations between plasma levels of lncRNA-NEF and the clinicopathological data of patients were analyzed using the χ2 test. The results illustrated that expression levels of lncRNA-NEF in lung biopsies (Table I) and plasma (Table II) were significantly associated with distant tumor metastasis (P<0.05), but not age, sex, smoking status, alcohol consumption or tumor size.
Table I.Associations between the expression levels of long non-coding RNA-neighboring enhancer of FOXA2 in lung biopsy tissues and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with small cell lung cancer. |
Table II.Associations between the plasma expression levels of long non-coding RNA-neighboring enhancer of FOXA2 in and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with small cell lung cancer. |
lncRNA-NEF overexpression inhibits and exogenous TGF-β1 promotes the migration and invasion of SCLC cells
The aforementioned results indicated the involvement of lncRNA-NEF in SCLC metastasis. To further support these findings, lncRNA-NEF expression vectors were transfected into SHP-77 and NCI-H69 cell lines, and cell migration and invasion were assessed using Transwell migration and invasion assays, respectively. Compared with the control and negative control cells, the cells overexpressing lncRNA-NEF demonstrated a significant reduction in migration (Fig. 3A) and invasion (P<0.05; Fig. 3B). By contrast, treatment with 10 ng/ml exogenous TGF-β1 significantly promoted cell migration and invasion, and reduced the inhibitory effects of lncRNA-NEF overexpression on cell migration and invasion (P<0.05).
lncRNA-NEF is a potential upstream inhibitor of TGF-β1 in SCLC
To further investigate the interactions between TGF-β1 and lncRNA-NEF, the expression level of TGF-β1 following lncRNA-NEF overexpression was detected using western blotting. As displayed in Fig. 4A, overexpression of lncRNA-NEF was achieved in two SCLC cell lines (P<0.05). Compared with the control and negative control cells, cells overexpressing lncRNA-NEF exhibited significantly lower TGF-β1 expression levels (active homodimer; Fig. 4B; P<0.05). By contrast, treatment with exogenous TGF-β1 at 5, 10, 20 and 50 ng/ml did not significantly effect lncRNA-NEF expression (Fig. 4C; P>0.05).
Discussion
lncRNA-NEF is a recently identified lncRNA with characterized tumor suppressor activity in hepatocellular carcinoma (11). The primary finding of the present study was that lncRNA-NEF may also be a tumor suppressor in SCLC. The results provided evidence that lncRNA-NEF was involved in the regulation of SCLC tumor metastasis, and that this was associated with the TGF-β pathway.
Altered expression levels of particular lncRNAs have been observed in the development of different types of lung cancer, including SCLC (14); lncRNA-taurine upregulated gene 1 (TUG1) was upregulated in SCLC, and the overexpression of TUG1 in cancer tissues and cells not only promoted cell growth, but also reduced the chemoresistance of cancer cells (15). Upregulation of lncRNA-exocyst complex component 7 (EXOC7) has also been observed in the cancer tissues of patients with SCLC (compared with para-cancerous tissues), and increased expression levels of lncRNA-EXOC7 provided diagnostic value (16). Additionally, lncRNA-NEF displayed a downregulated expression pattern in hepatocellular carcinoma (11). In the present study, significantly lower expression levels of lncRNA-NEF were observed in the lung tissue and plasma of patients with SCLC, compared with those in the healthy controls, indicating a role for lncRNA-NEF as a tumor suppressor in SCLC.
Differential expression of lncRNAs provides guidance for the diagnosis of lung cancer (17,18). In the present study, ROC curve analysis revealed that the downregulation of lncRNA-NEF may be used to effectively distinguish SCLC patients from healthy individuals. Furthermore, lncRNA-NEF expression levels were not significantly associated with patients' age, gender, alcohol consumption and smoking status, factors that may potentially influence lncRNA expression. Therefore, lncRNA-NEF may serve as a potential diagnostic marker for SCLC. However, lncRNA-NEF is a newly identified lncRNA with a known expression pattern in hepatocellular carcinoma only (11), thus the use of multiple biomarkers may improve diagnostic specificity.
TGF-β signaling is a double-edged sword in cancer biology (19), as it inhibits tumor growth at the initiation of cancer, but promotes tumor metastasis at the later stages of disease (7,20). The involvement of TGF-β signaling in the regulation of lung cancer metastasis has been reported in a number of subtypes, including lung adenocarcinoma metastasis (7) and NSCLC (21). In the present study, TGF-β1 resulted in accelerated migration and invasion of SCLC cells in vitro, suggesting that TGF-β1 is involved in the metastasis of SCLC. It has been frequently observed that expression of TGF-β1 can be regulated by lncRNAs during cancer development (22,23). The present study suggested that lncRNA-NEF is an upstream inhibitor of TGF-β1 in the regulation of migration and invasion of cells in SCLC. However, whether this regulatory role is direct or indirect remains unknown. Future studies aim to identify the potential intermediates between lncRNA-NEF and TGF-β1.
In conclusion, lncRNA-NEF is downregulated in SCLC patients compared with healthy controls, supporting its role as a tumor suppressor in this disease. lncRNA-NEF may promote metastasis, but not tumor growth, in SCLC by interacting with TGF-β1.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Author's contributions
LW and PW were responsible for the conception and design of the study, and performed the experiments. LW analyzed and interpreted the data. LW and PW then drafted the article and were responsible for the revision of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The protocol of the present study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of The First People's Hospital of Tianmen City (Tianmen, China), and all patients provided written informed consent.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Heerboth S, Housman G, Leary M, Longacre M, Byler S, Lapinska K, Willbanks A and Sarkar S: EMT and tumor metastasis. Clin Transl Med. 4:62015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ghajar CM: Metastasis prevention by targeting the dormant niche. Nat Rev Cancer. 15:238–247. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:5–29. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ettinger DS, Akerley W, Bepler G, Blum MG, Chang A, Cheney RT, Chirieac LR, D'Amico TA, Demmy TL, Ganti AK, et al: Non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 8:740–801. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tanoue LT, Tanner NT, Gould MK and Silvestri GA: Lung cancer screening. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 191:19–33. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
David CJ, Huang YH, Chen M, Su J, Zou Y, Bardeesy N, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA and Massagué J: TGF-β tumor suppression through a lethal EMT. Cell. 164:1015–1030. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu JR, Tai Y, Jin Y, Hammell MC, Wilkinson JE, Roe JS, Vakoc CR and Van Aelst L: TGF-β/Smad signaling through DOCK4 facilitates lung adenocarcinoma metastasis. Genes Dev. 29:250–261. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang H, Wang L, Zhao J, Chen Y, Lei Z, Liu X, Xia W, Guo L and Zhang HT: TGF-β-activated SMAD3/4 complex transcriptionally upregulates N-cadherin expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 87:249–257. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li C, Wan L, Liu Z, Xu G, Wang S, Su Z, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Liu X, Lei Z and Zhang HT: Long non-coding RNA XIST promotes TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition by regulating miR-367/141-ZEB2 axis in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 418:185–195. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fatica A and Bozzoni I: Long non-coding RNAs: New players in cell differentiation and development. Nat Rev Genet. 15:7–21. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liang WC, Ren JL, Wong CW, Chan SO, Waye MM, Fu WM and Zhang JF: LncRNA-NEF antagonized epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cancer metastasis via cis-regulating FOXA2 and inactivating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Oncogene. 37:1445–1456. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Travis WD and Rusch VW: Lung cancer-major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:138–155. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Peng Z, Zhang C and Duan C: Functions and mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs in lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 9:4411–4424. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Niu Y, Ma F, Huang W, Fang S, Li M, Wei T and Guo L: Long non-coding RNA TUG1 is involved in cell growth and chemoresistance of small cell lung cancer by regulating LIMK2b via EZH2. Mol Cancer. 16:52017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zeng L, Yang R, Wang J and Liu Y: The relationship between the expression of LncRNA EXOC7 and the prognosis of patients with small cell lung cancer. Tumor. 37:269–274. 2017. | |
Wan L, Zhang L, Fan K and Wang JJ: Diagnostic significance of circulating long noncoding RNA PCAT6 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 10:5695–5702. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang HM, Lu JH, Chen WY and Gu AQ: Upregulated lncRNA-UCA1 contributes to progression of lung cancer and is closely related to clinical diagnosis as a predictive biomarker in plasma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 8:11824–11830. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Akhurst RJ and Derynck R: TGF-beta signaling in cancer-a double-edged sword. Trends Cell Biol. 11:S44–S51. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Seoane J and Gomis RR: TGF-β family signaling in tumor suppression and cancer progression. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 9(pii): a0222772017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang L, Yang H, Lei Z, Zhao J, Chen Y, Chen P, Li C, Zeng Y, Liu Z, Liu X and Zhang HT: Repression of TIF1γ by SOX2 promotes TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 35:867–877. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang D, Qin H, Leng Y, Li X, Zhang L, Bai D, Meng Y and Wang J: LncRNA MEG3 overexpression inhibits the development of diabetic retinopathy by regulating TGF-β1 and VEGF. Exp Ther Med. 16:2337–2342. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao B, Lu YL, Yang Y, Hu LB, Bai Y, Li RQ, Zhang GY, Li J, Bi CW, Yang LB, et al: Overexpression of lncRNA ANRIL promoted the proliferation and migration of prostate cancer cells via regulating let-7a/TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway. Cancer Biomark. 21:613–620. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |