Immune disorder in endometrial cancer: Immunosuppressive microenvironment, mechanisms of immune evasion and immunotherapy (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 25, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11774
- Pages: 2075-2090
-
Copyright: © Zhan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in the developed world. The latest estimates indicated that there were 61,880 new cases and 12,160 EC-related deaths in 2019 in the USA (1). Obesity, hypertension and diabetes are the major risk factors for the development of EC in developed nations (2,3). Furthermore, Lynch syndrome is known to lead to the development of EC (4,5). In 1983, EC was first classified into the type I and II subgroups based on clinicopathological characteristics. Type I EC represents the most common form (70-80%). At least 90% of tumors express estrogen receptor (ER) moderately or strongly. By contrast, type II EC is estrogen-independent and predominantly represents serous carcinoma (6–8). However, this histological classification of EC has its limitations, such as poor reproducibility and overlapping morphological and immunohistochemical features (9,10). By performing comprehensive genomic analysis, The Cancer Genome Atlas program, which was first funded by the National Cancer Institute, aimed to classify EC on the basis of survival outcomes. The percentage of cases found for each type were as follows: i) Polymerase ε (POLE) ultramutated, 7%; ii) microsatellite instability (MSI) hypermutated, 30%; iii) copy-number low (microsatellite stable), 65%; and iv) copy-number high (predominantly serous histology), 26%. However, The Cancer Genome Atlas classification guidelines are not suitable for clinical application due to differences in demographic and clinical characteristics other than race/ethnicity and age, the members of The Cancer Genome Atlas classification guidelines not being systematically characterized, and no specific diagnosis criteria for each cancer type being present in the guidelines (11). Talhouk et al (12) developed a more practical technique, the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE), which utilizes immunohistochemistry to identify mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, including mutL homolog 1, PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component, mutS homolog 2 and mutS homolog 6, as well as p53 expression and DNA sequencing to identify POLE mutations. The feasibility of the ProMisE system has recently been validated in 452 EC cases (12–14).
The standard therapeutic approach for EC is surgical resection of the uterus by total hysterectomy (15). During the past decade, considerable advances made in the field of cancer cell-mediated immune evasion in the tumor microenvironment have invigorated the field of immuno-oncology (16,17). The success of immunomodulating strategies, such as the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer and melanoma, has generated great interest regarding their potential in the treatment of other solid tumors (18,19). Recently, immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of EC have been extensively evaluated. However, the developed treatment strategies have not been successful (20–22). In the present review, PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) was used to search for peer-reviewed publications using the following search terms: ‘endometrial cancer’, ‘endometrial carcinoma’, ‘immune response’, ‘immunosuppressive’, ‘immune evasion mechanisms’ and ‘immunotherapy’ in combination with other keywords related to the subject area. Relevant articles published until March 2020 are critically discussed. An overview of the immunosuppressive microenvironment of EC is presented first. The well-characterized mechanisms of immune evasion in EC are also described. Finally, preclinical studies and clinical trials involved in the development of immunotherapies for EC are reviewed.
Immunosuppressive microenvironment in EC
Immunoregulation in the endometrium is associated with the balance of the immune system in the endometrial microenvironment (20). The endometrium serves various immunological roles and acts as a physical barrier that prevents infection (20). The endometrium also establishes an immunosuppressive microenvironment that is essential for gestation and fetal development (20,23). The immunosuppressive microenvironment in EC is induced either through cell-mediated mechanisms or through molecular targets.
Cell-mediated mechanisms
CD8+ T cellsPascual-García et al (24) analyzed 35 neoplastic and 23 non-neoplastic endometrial samples, as well as corresponding peripheral blood samples, and demonstrated that the number of CD8+ T cells was lower in the endometrium of patients with EC than in the endometrium of control subjects. Furthermore, there was a lower number of CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood from patients with endometrioid grade 3 EC, who had not received radio- or chemotherapy before surgery, compared with that in the healthy group. Additionally, these data also indicated that CD8 expression was downregulated in EC (24). In another study involving 90 patients with EC, Kondratiev et al (25) demonstrated that an increase in the number of CD8+ T cells at the invasive border of the tumor epithelium is a favorable prognostic factor for patients with EC. Patients with a higher number of intraepithelial CD8+ lymphocytes at the invasive border of the tumor epithelium had improved overall survival (OS) time compared with patients with a lower number of intraepithelial CD8+ lymphocytes. Survival analysis demonstrated that cancer stage, vascular invasion, tumor grade and the number of intraepithelial CD8+ lymphocytes at the invasive border were independent predictors of OS time (25).
Regulatory T cells (Tregs)Chang et al (26) studied 57 patients with stage I–IV EC and observed that the CD4+CD25+ T cell population was considerably larger in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) than that in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs). Correlation analysis suggested that the upregulation of CD4 and CD25 expression in T cells in the cancer microenvironment was positively associated with high tumor grade, stage and myometrium invasion (26). Forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) expression in CD4+CD25+ Tregs is lower in PBLs than in TILs (26). Additionally, both granzyme B and perforin are rarely expressed in peripheral Tregs, but are widespread in Tregs in the tumor milieu (26). However, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), derived from PBLs, express higher levels of granzyme B and perforin than TILs, and T helper 1 cytokines and cytotoxic molecules are simultaneously increased in CD8+ CTLs, suggesting that, in the EC microenvironment, Tregs restrict CD8+ T cell activity in a granzyme B- and perforin-dependent manner (26). Low levels of both T helper 1 cytokines and cytotoxic enzymes contribute to the Treg-mediated inhibition of tumor clearance (26). Similar results were also obtained by Yamagami et al (27), who reported that the CD4+Foxp3+ cell count and CD4+Foxp3+/CD8+ ratio were novel prognostic factors for EC.
MacrophagesMacrophages, which can be polarized to the M1 (classical) or M2 (alternative) phenotypes, are one of the most abundant stromal immune cell types. In the tumor microenvironment, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) polarize to the M2 phenotype, which promotes immunosuppression, tumor progression and metastasis (28–30). The frequency of CD68+ macrophages is higher in the epithelial and stromal cells of type I and II EC than in those of the benign endometrium (31). Furthermore, patients with EC who have high CD68+ macrophage counts in the intra-tumoral border have worse progression-free survival (PFS) and OS time than patients with low CD68+ TAM density (32). Weber et al (33) demonstrated that the density of CD163+ M2 macrophages increased to a high level in the advanced stages of endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus. Consistent with these findings, Kübler et al (34) reported that there is a positive association between the expression of TAMs and advanced stage, higher tumor grade, lymphovascular space invasion and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in type I EC. Furthermore, TAMs are independently associated with recurrence-free survival and OS in type I EC (34).
Natural killer (NK) cellsNK cells are effector cells involved in antitumor and antiviral innate immune responses. NK cell activation is impaired in the tumor microenvironment, including the EC microenvironment. Garzetti et al (35) suggested that locally advanced stage I and II ECs had significantly lower mean values of NK cell activity compared with healthy controls. Furthermore, a decrease in NK cell activity increased the depth of myometrial tumor invasion (35). NK cell activity also diminished with increased nuclear grade in stage I EC. In another study involving 40 patients with stage I EC who underwent radical surgery, NK cell activation was negatively associated with histopathological features of stage I EC, including myometrial tumor invasion and proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunoreactivity (36). Recently, Versluis et al (37) suggested that the upregulation of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-E predicted improved disease-free survival and disease-specific survival time in EC. The number of NKp46 positive cells predicted a good clinical outcome, when the HLA-E levels were upregulated. However, the prognosis was poor when HLA-E levels were normal (Hazard ratio, 13.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.70–106.14).
Dendritic cells (DCs)DCs are a major part of the tumor microenvironment and serve an essential role in antitumor immunity by processing and presenting antigens to antigen-specific T cells. Disruption of DC activity is associated with EC progression (38). DC invasion has been observed in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (38). The DC markers S100-DR and HLA-DR serve a positive role in inhibiting EC progression and LNM (39). Jia et al (40) reported that the expression levels of CD80, CD86 and CD40 on DCs in the normal human endometrium were significantly higher than those on DCs in endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Morphological differences have also been observed between tumor-infiltrating DCs and those in the normal human endometrium. These findings suggested that the morphological differences and low expression levels of CD80, CD86 and CD40 on DCs in endometrioid adenocarcinoma could reflect functional changes in tumor-infiltrating DCs, affecting antigen uptake and presentation, thereby possibly promoting tumor immune escape.
B lymphocytes and others
Zinovkin and Pranjol (41) studied 82 patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma at stages I–III and demonstrated that the downregulation of lineage-specific markers in T lymphocytes (CD3), NK cells (CD57) and macrophages (CD68), and the upregulation of markers in B lymphocytes (CD20) and DCs (S100) in endometrioid adenocarcinoma, indicated a poor clinical outcome. Furthermore, as cancer-associated fibroblasts (42) and adipocytes (43) serve an important role in the genesis of an immunosuppressive microenvironment and in the malignant progression of hyperplasia, their functions in EC need to be studied further in the future. Cell-mediated mechanisms are summarized in Table I.
Molecular targets
Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) and PD-L2
The B7 family of immune checkpoint inhibitors is divided into three subgroups: Group I consists of B7-1, B7-2, CD28, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and B7H, group II includes PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2, and group III includes B7-H3, B7-H4, HERV-H LTR-associating 2, and transmembrane and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein 2. The members of the B7 family serve a critical role in the immune response (44). PD-1 was first discovered in 1992 and is expressed on the surface of T cells (45). PD-1 has two known ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2 (46). PD-L1, which has been extensively studied over the last few years, is the most well-known immune checkpoint inhibitor (47). Overall, 67–100% of primary, recurrent and metastatic EC cases express PD-L1 (48). Mo et al (49) suggested that PD-1, PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in all tumor-infiltrating immune cells is more frequent in moderately and poorly differentiated EC and non-endometrioid EC than in well-differentiated EC and endometrioid EC. Recently, Kim et al (50) proposed the prognostic significance of PD-1 and PD-L1 in patients with EC, and indicated that high PD-L1 levels were an independent adverse prognostic factor for PFS, especially for subgroups of patients with an MSI mutation. Analysis of immune markers suggested that high PD-L1/CD8 and PD-L1/PD-1 ratios were independently positively associated with shorter PFS times.
B7-H3 and B7-H4
B7-H3 and B7-H4, two novel members of the B7 family, have been suggested to serve an immune function in the tumor microenvironment (51). Brunner et al (52) studied 99 patients with type I or II primary EC and observed that patients with advanced tumors had markedly higher B7-H3 levels than patients with low-grade tumors. Additionally, expression analysis of B7-H3 in the vascular endothelium of the tumor tissue suggested a positive association with EC grade. Furthermore, there was a strong association between B7-H3 expression in tumor cells and frequency of CD8+ positive TILs. Univariate survival analysis indicated that B7-H3 overexpression in cancer cells was associated with shortened OS time (52). Similarly, B7-H4 was upregulated in hyperplastic and malignant endometrial epithelium, and associated with the frequency of T cells, suggesting that B7-H4 overexpression reflects more aggressive EC, leading to EC tumor cell evasion (53). Additionally, a recent study indicated that B7-H4 expression was consistent across the various molecular subtypes of EC, suggesting that B7-H4 expression is independent of EC grade, histological type and infiltrating-immune cell type (54).
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO)
IDO is an enzyme that catalyzes the metabolism of the essential amino acid tryptophan in the initial and rate-limiting steps of the kynurenine pathway (55). Accumulating evidence has indicated that cancer tissue contains higher IDO levels than normal tissue (55). Ino et al (56) reported that high IDO expression in EC cells was present in 37/80 cases and was positively associated with surgical stage, myometrial invasion status, lymphovascular space involvement and LNM, but not with histological grade. Patients with EC expressing high levels of IDO had significantly worse PFS and OS time than patients with EC with low or no IDO expression. Multivariate analysis has suggested that IDO expression is an independent predictor of PFS (56). Furthermore, high levels of IDO in EC correspond to a low density of TILs and NK cells (57,58), and high levels of PD-L1 (59).
HLA
The HLA class I system serves an important role in the tumor immune response. This system comprises the classical HLA-A, -B and -C antigens, and the non-classical HLA-E, -F and -G antigens (60). Cancer cells can escape the CTL response by inhibiting HLA class I molecules (61,62). de Jong et al (63) reported the loss of HLA-A and/or HLA-B/C in 41.3% of patients in a study conducted on a cohort of 486 patients with sporadic endometrioid EC. Furthermore, the downregulation of HLA-B/C has been observed to occur more frequently in high-grade EC (63). Barrier et al (64) demonstrated that HLA-G protein was localized in the glandular epithelium and expressed in a substantial proportion of endometrial adenocarcinoma cases. However, overexpression of HLA-G in EC is not associated with clinical variables, disease-free survival or disease-specific survival (65). Non-classical HLA-G comprises four membrane-bound isoforms (HLA-G1 to HLA-G4) and three soluble isoforms (HLA-G5 to HLA-G7) (66). All HLA-G isoforms are detectable in the early and advanced stages of EC (67). The plasma levels of soluble HLA-G are significantly higher in patients with EC compared with that in healthy individuals. Additionally, soluble HLA-G5 molecules are more frequently observed than membrane-bound HLA-G1 molecules in patients with EC (67). Notably, the level of soluble HLA-G is higher in the early stages of EC compared with that in high-grade EC (67).
Receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells (RCAS1)
RCAS1 is expressed on immune cells and serves as a ligand for a receptor of RCAS1 present on various human cell lines and normal peripheral lymphocytes such as T, B and NK cells (68,69). In hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreaticobiliary cancers, high levels of RCAS1 result in aggressive tumor behavior in humans, widely invasive type more frequently overexpressed RCAS1 than the minimally invasive type, and the incidences of RCAS1 overexpression increased with carcinoma dedifferentiation (70). Sonoda et al (71) was the first to report that the expression levels of RCAS1 were higher in endometrioid adenocarcinoma than in the normal and hyperplastic endometrium, and that RCAS1 exhibited significantly higher expression in grade III tumors than in grade I or II tumors. By contrast, RCAS1 expression is independent of clinical stage, myometrial invasion status, lymph-vascular space invasion and LNM in EC (71). Subsequently, the same authors (72) studied 147 patients with uterine EC and demonstrated that RCAS1 was expressed in 106 patients. Furthermore, 30/147 patients exhibited RCAS1 overexpression, which was positively associated with age at surgical resection, cancer stage, extent of myometrial invasion and positive peritoneal cytology results. Additionally, RCAS1 expression and metastasis were clinically significant predictors of OS according to multivariate analysis(72). Recently, Szubert et al (73) suggested that high levels of RCAS1 in post-surgery serum are an independent p redictor of shortened OS time in patients with EC.
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)
COX is the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of prostaglandins. COX exists both as a constitutively expressed isoform (COX-1) and a regulated isoform (COX-2) (74). COX-2 enables tumor cells to escape immunological surveillance (75,76). Ohno et al (77) studied 70 patients with EC and proposed that COX-2 overexpression was positively associated with EC stage and myometrial invasion status. There was also an inverse association between the levels of COX-2 and the frequency of CD8+ T cells in tumor cells. Furthermore, univariate analysis indicated that COX-2 levels were predictive of EC recurrence (77). A previous study demonstrated that patients with MSI-positive EC and high COX-2 expression had a worse prognosis than patients with MSI-positive EC and low COX-2 expression (78).
Fas and Fas ligand (FasL)
Fas (CD95) and its ligand FasL are expressed in various types of cancer and have been implicated in immune evasion mechanisms in cancer cells (79). In a previous study, Fas mRNA expression was markedly lower in EC tissue, compared with that in normal endometrial tissue. However, no significant difference in FasL mRNA expression was detected (80). Jia et al (81) reported that Fas expression was significantly lower in tumor-infiltrating DCs and significantly higher in endometrioid adenocarcinoma than in the normal endometrium, resulting in tumor immune escape (81).
Survivin
Immune responses to survivin have been described in several types of tumors (82,83). Survivin upregulation in patients with EC leads to the inhibition of apoptotic proteins and promotes multi-drug resistance. High levels of survivin have been suggested to be an independent prognostic factor of EC associated with poor PFS time (84,85). Furthermore, survivin downregulation by curcumin-loaded amphiphilic mixed micelles has been demonstrated to improve immunochemotherapy in EC (86).
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
IL-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is involved in the modulation of the immune response (87). Bellone et al (88) reported that IL-6 mRNA expression was significantly upregulated in uterine serous papillary carcinoma. Furthermore, IL-6 expression levels were significantly higher in patients with EC and uterine papillary serous carcinoma than in healthy females (88). The molecular targets described in this section are summarized in Table II.
Mechanisms of immune evasion in EC
The mechanisms of immune evasion in EC can be broadly grouped into five categories: i) Gene mutations; ii) inhibition of T lymphocyte activity; iii) inhibition of NK cell activity; iv) promotion of PD-L1 protein expression; and v) promotion of EC cell sensitivity to estrogen (Fig. 1). However, the actual mechanisms of immune evasion in EC are likely more complex. The available evidence is reviewed in the following sections.
Gene mutations
Ren et al (89) detected 50 Janus kinase 1 (JAK1)-truncating mutations in 5.67% of gynecological tumors, using the Total Cancer Care® tumor bank resource. Furthermore, frame-shift mutations at K142, P430 and K860 have been suggested to be hotspot mutation sites. Functional experiments revealed cancer cells lacking JAK1 in the interferon-γ-driven induction of low-molecular weight protein-2 of the proteasome and the MHC class I (MHC I) pathway protein transporter associated with antigen processing-1 expression (89). Furthermore, the loss of low-molecular weight protein-2 and transporter associated with antigen processing-1 inhibits the presentation of tumor antigens and contributes to tumor immune evasion in EC (89). Recently, Albacker et al (90) demonstrated that JAK1 frameshift mutations were associated with high tumor mutation burden and MSI mutations in EC. Furthermore, endometrial and stomach adenocarcinomas with JAK1 frameshift mutations displayed low interferon response levels and an increase in antitumor immunological reactions. These results suggested that mutations in JAK1 were associated with the loss of interferon response and tumor immune escape in MSI-type EC (90).
Mucin 16, cell surface-associated (MUC16), also known as CA125, is a diagnostic serum marker and an indicator of adverse prognosis in gynecological cancer types (91). Recently, the MUC16 gene was found to be frequently mutated in EC. Patients with EC harboring somatic MUC16 mutations had longer OS times compared with non-MUC16 mutated patients with EC. In addition, MUC16 mutations promoted antitumor immune responses in these patients. Furthermore, the upregulation of the NO2-dependent IL-12 signaling pathway indicated the higher rate of MUC16 mutations in NK cells and some surface proteins in CTLs. These patients also had significantly longer survival times. In addition, patients with EC harboring MUC16 mutations have an elevated level of cytotoxic TILs, thereby rescuing T cell antitumor immunity in the EC microenvironment as well as prolonging OS (92).
MHC I molecules inhibit cancer by activating the immune response, and MHC I inhibition leads to cancer immune evasion (93). Nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor (NLR) family, caspase recruitment domain-containing 5 (NLRC5) has recently been recognized as a crucial transcriptional coactivator of MHC I expression (94). Yoshihama et al (95) revealed that copy-number loss-, somatic mutation- and epigenetic alteration-mediated NLRC5 downregulation was associated with the expression of MHC I molecules and cytotoxic T cell markers in uterine cancer. Furthermore, overexpression of NLRC5 contributes to the activation of CD8+ CTLs and patient survival in uterine cancer (95).
Inhibition of T-lymphocyte activity
COX-2 upregulation suppresses antitumor immunity in several types of cancer (96,97). High levels of COX-2 are implicated in immunosuppression in EC. Ohno et al (77) reported that COX-2 attenuated the infiltration of CD8+ T cells into the EC tumor milieu, thereby allowing cancer cells to escape immunosurveillance. St-Germain et al (98) demonstrated that AKT signals induce COX-2 expression via the activation of the NF-κB/IκB signaling pathway in EC (98).
V-domain Ig suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA) is a newly identified immune checkpoint inhibitory molecule. VISTA is overexpressed in EC. Upregulation of VISTA in EC suppresses T cell proliferation and IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α expression in vitro, and reduces the number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in vivo (99). Furthermore, treatment with allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-VISTA antibody prolongs the survival of tumor-bearing mice (99).
TAMs serve an important role in immunosuppression mechanisms in EC (100). A previous study demonstrated that TAMs could mediate immune suppression by inhibiting T-cell activation and promoting the expression of immunosuppressive cytokines, as well as C-C motif chemokines 17 and 22 (101).
Inhibition of NK cell activity
Yoshida et al (102) demonstrated that, in a mouse xenograft model of EC, tumor growth was faster in nude mice bearing IDO-overexpressing xenografts than in control mice. Splenic NK cell counts were lower in mice bearing an IDO-overexpressing xenograft compared with those in control xenografted mice. Furthermore, IDO-overexpressing cell cultures greatly decreased the lytic activity of NK cells in nude mice. Oral administration of the IDO inhibitor 1-methyl-D-tryptophan and paclitaxel to mice bearing an IDO-overexpressing xenograft promoted the antitumor effect of paclitaxel and led to markedly longer survival times. These results indicated that IDO overexpression in human EC cells may lead to tumor development in vivo by restricting NK cell activity (102). In addition, Check and Cohen (103) demonstrated that progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) may be associated with the production of an immunomodulatory protein through the inhibition of NK cell cytotoxicity in cancer (103). Nevertheless, the role of PIBF in EC needs to be studied further.
Promotion of PD-L1 protein expression
Yang et al (104) reported that 17β-estradiol could increase the levels of PD-L1 by activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in ER-α-positive Ishikawa cells. In a co-culture of Ishikawa cells and T cells, the expression levels of interferon-γ and IL-2 were downregulated, and the expression levels of B cell lymphoma 2 were upregulated following treatment with 17β-estradiol, suggesting that ER-α-positive EC cells inhibit T-cell function by promoting PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment (104).
Promotion of EC cell sensitivity to estrogen
Ning et al (105) demonstrated that IL-4- and IL-13-induced CD68+CD163+ macrophages enhance the effects of estradiol on EC cell proliferation by upregulating ER-α. The infiltrating CD68+CD163+ macrophages upregulate the expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-17A, through ten-eleven translocation 1-mediated epigenetic modulation. The increased estrogen sensitivity of the EC cells stimulates cancer cell proliferation by activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.
Immunotherapy for EC
Based on the findings on the immunosuppressive microenvironment and the mechanisms of immune evasion in EC, several immunotherapeutic strategies were explored in EC. These approaches can be broadly subdivided into three categories: i) Anticancer vaccines; ii) immune checkpoint inhibitors; and iii) immunomodulatory agents (Fig. 2).
Anticancer vaccines
Vaccine-based treatments for cancer are designed with the aim of activating immune responses against tumor antigens. In a phase I trial by Kaumaya et al (106), which enrolled 24 patients with metastatic cancer (5 with breast cancer, 5 with ovarian cancer, 5 with colorectal cancer, 2 with EC, 1 with cervical cancer, 1 with pancreatic cancer, 1 with adrenal cancer, 1 with gastrointestinal stromal cancer, 1 with leiomyosarcoma, 1 with non-small cell lung cancer and 1 with an unspecified squamous cell cancer), a dose escalation (range, 0.5–3.0 mg) study was designed with a combination vaccine. The vaccine was a mixture of two chimeric, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 B cell epitopes fused to a promiscuous T cell epitope. After receiving three inoculations of the intended dose, 62.5% of patients raised an antibody response with no serious adverse events, autoimmune disease or cardiotoxicity. These results suggested that the peptide vaccine safely induced the generation of IgG antibodies in a population of patients who have metastatic disease, including EC (106). Nonetheless, to date, immunotherapeutic approaches, such as the use of vaccines in patients with EC (107,108), are largely limited to a handful of patients owing to the prognostic relevance of TILs, data related to TILS remains controversial with a higher level of TILs associated to low grade lesions by some authors (21) and to a high grade by others (22).
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
As aforementioned, PD-1 and PD-L1 are frequently expressed in EC. Overexpression of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibits the activation of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the EC microenvironment (48). Previous studies have indicated that POLE-ultramutated EC and MSI-hypermutated EC exhibit high neoantigen expression and a high number of TILs, as well as upregulation of PD-1 and PD-L1 (109). Therefore, targeting the PD-1 signaling pathway is a potentially useful approach to accelerate the antitumor immune response in the POLE-ultramutated and MSI-hypermutated subtypes of EC. Mehnert et al (110) described the case of a 53-year-old patient who presented with irregular vaginal bleeding and was subjected to a hysterectomy as a result of the diagnosis of a pT1b, pN0, stage IB, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (10) grade III endometrial adenocarcinoma of the high-grade endometrioid type, with extensive necrosis, lymphovascular invasion and myometrial invasion. Furthermore, the primary tumor tissue and LNM were subjected to genomic profiling and both samples exhibited POLE mutations (110). The patient was then enrolled in a phase Ib trial (NCT02054806). In the phase Ib trial, 24 patients with advanced and PD-L1-positive EC were administered an intravenous humanized monoclonal antibody targeting PD-1 (pembrolizumab) at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for up to 24 months. Among the 24 patients, 3 patients with EC had a partial clinical response, while stable disease was observed in 2 patients with EC. Furthermore, the overall response rate was 13%. The 6-month PFS and OS rates were 19.0 and 68.8%, respectively. Only mild adverse effects, such as fatigue, pruritus, pyrexia and anorexia, were observed in 54.2% of patients (111). In a phase II trial involving pembrolizumab, objective response rates reached 71% in 2 patients with MSIhigh EC (112). Recently, Makker et al (113) conducted a study involving 54 patients with EC (unscreened for MSI or PD-L1 expression) and analyzed 53 patients in an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study (NCT02501096). In this study, 21 patients had an objective response, with an acceptable safety profile at week 24 after they were administered 20 mg oral lenvatinib daily, plus 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab every 3 weeks. However, an increased frequency of hypothyroidism was observed (113). Other humanized antibodies of checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1, such as atezolizumab, durvalumab, tremelimumab, ipilimumab and nivolumab, were also studied in EC with a POLE-ultramutated and MSI-hypermutated phenotype. A significant clinical response was observed in these clinical trials (111,113–116). These clinical trials involving immunotherapy for EC are available at https://clinicaltrials.gov, and are listed in Table III.
Patients with Lynch syndrome-associated MSIhigh EC exhibit a lower response rate to single anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy than patients with sporadic MSIhigh EC (117). These data suggested that clinical trials assessing the effect of immunotherapy in patients with EC must assess Lynch-related and sporadic MSIhigh EC independently (117). However, POLE-ultramutated status has been revealed as an early and, possibly, initiating event in EC (118). These results provide a strong theoretical basis for further research of checkpoint inhibitors in EC with a POLE-ultramutated and MSI-hypermutated phenotype (119). Notably, a recent study by Talhouk et al (120) revealed that TILhigh tumors harbor dense T- and B-lineage infiltrates and multiple immunosuppressive features, and are more common among the molecular subtypes of EC associated with high mutation load (MMR and POLE) than ECs with a low mutation load (p53 abnormalities and p53 wild-type). Furthermore, TILlow tumors are generally devoid of immunological features and are more prevalent in ECs harboring p53 abnormalities and wild-type p53, although they are also seen in MMR and POLE subtypes. Additionally, in multivariate models involving a ProMisE subtype, T-cell markers and TIL clusters, only ProMisE was associated with independent prognostic significance (120). These findings suggested that the assessment of an immune response rather than the molecular subtype may better predict a clinical response to immunotherapy (120,121). Nevertheless, as aforementioned, targeting the PD-1 signaling pathway has great potential in enhancing antitumor immune responses, as accumulating evidence demonstrates that antitumor functions are induced following PD-1 and PD-L1 engagement in cancer cells in vivo (50,112–117). These multifunctional PD-1 signaling pathways need to be made available for the treatment of additional types of cancer.
Immunomodulatory agents in EC
Immunomodulatory agents, other than immune checkpoint inhibitors, may emerge as promising therapeutic agents in the future. Mills et al (59) demonstrated that IDO levels were upregulated in endometrial carcinoma and diffuse staining was principally more common in MMR-deficient cancer, particularly Lynch syndrome-associated cases, suggesting that targeting IDO may be a promising treatment approach for MMR-deficient endometrial carcinoma.
Other immunotherapies currently under investigation for the treatment of EC involve immunomodulatory agents, such as COX-2 (122), RCAS1 (123), tissue factor (124), human trophoblast-cell surface marker (125), survivin (126), IL-6 (127) and rBBX-01 (128). These targets are still in preclinical or early clinical development and have achieved promising clinical results, indicating that these immunotherapies are potential strategies in the treatment of EC.
Conclusions and future perspectives
The aforementioned research efforts, which aimed to investigate the role of the immune response in EC, including the immunosuppressive microenvironment, immune evasion mechanisms and immunotherapy, offer a strong rationale for immunotherapeutic approaches in the treatment of EC. Indeed, the use of checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines for EC treatment has yielded good clinical outcomes. Although key milestones have been reached, numerous efforts have proven ineffective and the efficacy of immunotherapy in EC needs to be further demonstrated in the future.
Firstly, the induced immunosuppressive microenvironment in EC is influenced by multiple factors, including immune cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and immunomodulatory agents and their interactions. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the manner in which the tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment can be modulated to enhance the immune response against EC. Furthermore, significant knowledge gaps need to be filled through the use of molecular, cellular and structural biology approaches, in order to identify appropriate targets for immune cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents in immunotherapeutic applications.
Secondly, the exact immunosuppressive or immune evasion mechanisms involved in EC remain to be determined. Indeed, only a few candidate neoantigens selected by the current neoantigen-prediction algorithms trigger an antitumor response. Mechanisms of immunosuppression and immune evasion proposed on the basis of preclinical studies on immune checkpoint inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents represent a promising clinical application. However, these have yet to be tested on patients in EC, with the results pending for numerous clinical trials.
Lastly, a single immunotherapy approach may be ineffective against advanced metastatic or recurrent EC. Evidence from preclinical research indicates that combinatorial modalities, targeting different facets of the immune response, lead to improved therapeutic efficacy; early clinical studies suggest that such therapeutic approaches can be more effective. However, side effects must be considered when using such combinations. The sequence, timing, dosage and choice of drugs should be designed well to achieve optimal antitumor and minimal off-target side effects. Furthermore, a combinatorial therapy approach may be appropriate to synergize the effects of conventional therapies and immunotherapy against EC.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81802586), the Natural Science Foundation of Colleges and Universities (grant no. KJ2017A197), the Special Funds for the Development of Science and Technology of Anhui Province (grant no. YDZX20183400004194), the Research Fund Project granted from Anhui Research Institute of Translational Medicine (grant no. 2017zhyx30), and the 2018 Anhui Key Research and Development Project (grant no. 1804a07020128).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
LZ wrote the manuscript and drafted the figures. XL and JZ revised the manuscript. YC and BW reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Glossary
Abbreviations
Abbreviations:
COX |
cyclooxygenase |
CTL |
cytotoxic T lymphocyte |
EC |
endometrial cancer |
ER-α |
estrogen receptor α |
FasL |
Fas ligand |
JAK1 |
Janus kinase 1 |
HLA |
human leukocyte antigen |
IDO |
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase |
IL |
interleukin |
LNM |
lymph node metastasis |
MMR |
mismatch repair |
MSI |
microsatellite instability |
MHC |
major histocompatibility complex |
NK |
natural killer |
NLR |
nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor |
NLRC5 |
NLR family, caspase recruitment domain containing 5 |
OS |
overall survival |
PBL |
peripheral blood lymphocyte |
PD-1 |
programmed cell death-1 |
PD-L1 |
PD-1 ligand 1 |
PFS |
progression-free survival |
ProMisE |
Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer |
RCAS1 |
receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells |
TAM |
tumor-associated macrophage |
TIL |
tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte |
Treg |
regulatory T cell |
VISTA |
V-domain Ig suppressor of T cell activation |
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 69:7–34. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Van Arsdale A, Miller DT, Kuo DY, Isani S, Sanchez L and Nevadunsky NS: Association of obesity with survival in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 154:156–162. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang X and Wang J: The Role of Metabolic Syndrome in Endometrial Cancer: A Review. Front Oncol. 9:7442019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lynch HT, Snyder CL, Shaw TG, Heinen CD and Hitchins MP: Milestones of Lynch syndrome: 1895–2015. Nat Rev Cancer. 15:181–194. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boretto M, Maenhoudt N, Luo X, Hennes A, Boeckx B, Bui B, Heremans R, Perneel L, Kobayashi H, Van Zundert I, et al: Patient-derived organoids from endometrial disease capture clinical heterogeneity and are amenable to drug screening. Nat Cell Biol. 21:1041–1051. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bokhman JV: Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 15:10–17. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N and Darai E: Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 387:1094–1108. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brooks RA, Fleming GF, Lastra RR, Lee NK, Moroney JW, Son CH, Tatebe K and Veneris JL: Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 69:258–279. 2019.PubMed/NCBI | |
Han G, Sidhu D, Duggan MA, Arseneau J, Cesari M, Clement PB, Ewanowich CA, Kalloger SE and Köbel M: Reproducibility of histological cell type in high-grade endometrial carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 26:1594–1604. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zannoni GF, Vellone VG, Arena V, Prisco MG, Scambia G, Carbone A and Gallo D: Does high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (grade 3 FIGO) belong to type I or type II endometrial cancer? A clinical-pathological and immunohistochemical study. Virchows Arch. 457:27–34. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, Akbani R, Liu Y, Shen H, Robertson AG, Pashtan I, Shen R, Benz CC, et al Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, : Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 497:67–73. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S, Yang W, Lum A, Senz J, Boyd N, Pike J, Anglesio M, Kwon JS, et al: Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer. Cancer. 123:802–813. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S, Li-Chang HH, Kwon JS, Melnyk N, Yang W, Senz J, Boyd N, Karnezis AN, et al: A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers. Br J Cancer. 113:299–310. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kommoss S, McConechy MK, Kommoss F, Leung S, Bunz A, Magrill J, Britton H, Kommoss F, Grevenkamp F, Karnezis A, et al: Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series. Ann Oncol. 29:1180–1188. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim M, Suh DH, Lee KH, Eom KY, Toftdahl NG, Mirza MR and Kim JW: Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2018. J Gynecol Oncol. 30:e182019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Melero I, Berman DM, Aznar MA, Korman AJ, Pérez Gracia JL and Haanen J: Evolving synergistic combinations of targeted immunotherapies to combat cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 15:457–472. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dracopoli NC and Boguski MS: The evolution of oncology companion diagnostics from signal transduction to immuno-oncology. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 38:41–54. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kowanetz M, Zou W, Gettinger SN, Koeppen H, Kockx M, Schmid P, Kadel EE III, Wistuba I, Chaft J, Rizvi NA, et al: Differential regulation of PD-L1 expression by immune and tumor cells in NSCLC and the response to treatment with atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 115:E10119–E10126. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tawbi HA, Forsyth PA, Algazi A, Hamid O, Hodi FS, Moschos SJ, Khushalani NI, Lewis K, Lao CD, Postow MA, et al: Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in melanoma metastatic to the brain. N Engl J Med. 379:722–730. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vanderstraeten A, Tuyaerts S and Amant F: The immune system in the normal endometrium and implications for endometrial cancer development. J Reprod Immunol. 109:7–16. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deligdisch L: Morphologic correlates of host response in endometrial carcinoma. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2:54–57. 1982. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Silverberg SG, Sasano N and Yajima A: Endometrial carcinoma in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan: Histopathologic analysis of a cancer registry-based series and comparison with cases in American women. Cancer. 49:1504–1510. 1982. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wira CR, Fahey JV, Ghosh M, Patel MV, Hickey DK and Ochiel DO: Sex hormone regulation of innate immunity in the female reproductive tract: The role of epithelial cells in balancing reproductive potential with protection against sexually transmitted pathogens. Am J Reprod Immunol. 63:544–565. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pascual-García M, Bértolo C, Nieto JC, Serrat N, Espinosa Í, D'Angelo E, Muñoz R, Rovira R, Vidal S and Prat J: CD8 down-regulation on cytotoxic T lymphocytes of patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 56:180–188. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kondratiev S, Sabo E, Yakirevich E, Lavie O and Resnick MB: Intratumoral CD8+ T lymphocytes as a prognostic factor of survival in endometrial carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 10:4450–4456. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chang WC, Li CH, Huang SC, Chang DY, Chou LY and Sheu BC: Clinical significance of regulatory T cells and CD8+ effector populations in patients with human endometrial carcinoma. Cancer. 116:5777–5788. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yamagami W, Susumu N, Tanaka H, Hirasawa A, Banno K, Suzuki N, Tsuda H, Tsukazaki K and Aoki D: Immunofluorescence-detected infiltration of CD4+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells is relevant to the prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 21:1628–1634. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sica A and Mantovani A: Macrophage plasticity and polarization: In vivo veritas. J Clin Invest. 122:787–795. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xue J, Schmidt SV, Sander J, Draffehn A, Krebs W, Quester I, De Nardo D, Gohel TD, Emde M, Schmidleithner L, et al: Transcriptome-based network analysis reveals a spectrum model of human macrophage activation. Immunity. 40:274–288. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zeng Q and Jewell CM: Directing toll-like receptor signaling in macrophages to enhance tumor immunotherapy. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 60:138–145. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dun EC, Hanley K, Wieser F, Bohman S, Yu J and Taylor RN: Infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages is increased in the epithelial and stromal compartments of endometrial carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 32:576–584. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Soeda S, Nakamura N, Ozeki T, Nishiyama H, Hojo H, Yamada H, Abe M and Sato A: Tumor-associated macrophages correlate with vascular space invasion and myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 109:122–128. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weber SK, Sauerwald A, Pölcher M, Braun M, Debald M, Serce NB, Kuhn W, Brunagel-Walgenbach G and Rudlowski C: Detection of lymphovascular invasion by D2-40 (podoplanin) immunoexpression in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 22:1442–1448. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kübler K, Ayub TH, Weber SK, Zivanovic O, Abramian A, Keyver-Paik MD, Mallmann MR, Kaiser C, Serçe NB, Kuhn W, et al: Prognostic significance of tumor-associated macrophages in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 135:176–183. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Garzetti GG, Ciavattini A, Muzzioli M, Goteri G, Fabris N, Valensise H and Romanini C: The relationship of clinical-pathologic status and adjuvant treatment with natural killer cell activity in stage I and II endometrial carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 73:652–657. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Garzetti GG, Ciavattini A, Goteri G, Tranquilli AL, Muzzioli M, Fabris N, De Nictolis M and Romanini C: Natural killer cell activity in stage I endometrial carcinoma: Correlation with nuclear grading, myometrial invasion, and immunoreactivity of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Gynecol Oncol. 55:111–114. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Versluis MA, Marchal S, Plat A, de Bock GH, van Hall T, de Bruyn M, Hollema H and Nijman HW: The prognostic benefit of tumour-infiltrating Natural Killer cells in endometrial cancer is dependent on concurrent overexpression of Human Leucocyte Antigen-E in the tumour microenvironment. Eur J Cancer. 86:285–295. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen C, Zhu YB, Qu QX, Ge Y, Huang JA, Wang Y and Zhang XG: CD40-activated apoptotic tumor cell-pulsed dendritic cell could potentially elicit antitumor immune response: Involvement of up-regulation of B7-H3 expression. J Immunother. 32:29–35. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lijun Z, Xin Z, Danhua S, Xiaoping L, Jianliu W, Huilan W and Lihui W: Tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells may be used as clinicopathologic prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 22:836–841. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jia J, Wang Z, Li X, Wang Z and Wang X: Morphological characteristics and co-stimulatory molecule (CD80, CD86, CD40) expression in tumor infiltrating dendritic cells in human endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 160:223–227. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zinovkin D and Pranjol MZ: Tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of corpus uteri as potential prognostic factors: An immunohistochemical study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 26:1207–1212. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Inoue T, Adachi K, Kawana K, Taguchi A, Nagamatsu T, Fujimoto A, Tomio K, Yamashita A, Eguchi S, Nishida H, et al: Cancer-associated fibroblast suppresses killing activity of natural killer cells through downregulation of poliovirus receptor (PVR/CD155), a ligand of activating NK receptor. Int J Oncol. 49:1297–1304. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kerr J, Anderson C and Lippman SM: Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, diet, and cancer: An update and emerging new evidence. Lancet Oncol. 18:e457–e471. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ni L and Dong C: New checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Immunol Rev. 276:52–65. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ishida Y, Agata Y, Shibahara K and Honjo T: Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J. 11:3887–3895. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Curran CS, Gupta S, Sanz I and Sharon E: PD-1 immunobiology in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Autoimmun. 97:1–9. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin H-T, Ahmed R and Okazaki T: Role of PD-1 in regulating T-cell immunity. 350:17–37. 2010. | |
Vanderstraeten A, Luyten C, Verbist G, Tuyaerts S and Amant F: Mapping the immunosuppressive environment in uterine tumors: Implications for immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 63:545–557. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mo Z, Liu J, Zhang Q, Chen Z, Mei J, Liu L, Yang S, Li H, Zhou L and You Z: Expression of PD-1, PD-L1 and PD-L2 is associated with differentiation status and histological type of endometrial cancer. Oncol Lett. 12:944–950. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim J, Kim S, Lee HS, Yang W, Cho H, Chay DB, Cho SJ, Hong S and Kim JH: Prognostic implication of programmed cell death 1 protein and its ligand expressions in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 149:381–387. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Janakiram M, Shah UA, Liu W, Zhao A, Schoenberg MP and Zang X: The third group of the B7-CD28 immune checkpoint family: HHLA2, TMIGD2, B7×, and B7-H3. Immunol Rev. 276:26–39. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brunner A, Hinterholzer S, Riss P, Heinze G and Brustmann H: Immunoexpression of B7-H3 in endometrial cancer: Relation to tumor T-cell infiltration and prognosis. Gynecol Oncol. 124:105–111. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miyatake T, Tringler B, Liu W, Liu SH, Papkoff J, Enomoto T, Torkko KC, Dehn DL, Swisher A and Shroyer KR: B7-H4 (DD-O110) is overexpressed in high risk uterine endometrioid adenocarcinomas and inversely correlated with tumor T-cell infiltration. Gynecol Oncol. 106:119–127. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bregar A, Deshpande A, Grange C, Zi T, Stall J, Hirsch H, Reeves J, Sathyanarayanan S, Growdon WB and Rueda BR: Characterization of immune regulatory molecules B7-H4 and PD-L1 in low and high grade endometrial tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 145:446–452. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ricciuti B, Leonardi GC, Puccetti P, Fallarino F, Bianconi V, Sahebkar A, Baglivo S, Chiari R and Pirro M: Targeting indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase in cancer: Scientific rationale and clinical evidence. Pharmacol Ther. 196:105–116. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ino K, Yoshida N, Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Yamamoto E, Kidokoro K, Takahashi N, Terauchi M, Nawa A, Nomura S, et al: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is a novel prognostic indicator for endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer. 95:1555–1561. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
de Jong RA, Kema IP, Boerma A, Boezen HM, van der Want JJ, Gooden MJ, Hollema H and Nijman HW: Prognostic role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 126:474–480. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ino K, Yamamoto E, Shibata K, Kajiyama H, Yoshida N, Terauchi M, Nawa A, Nagasaka T, Takikawa O and Kikkawa F: Inverse correlation between tumoral indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in endometrial cancer: Its association with disease progression and survival. Clin Cancer Res. 14:2310–2317. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mills A, Zadeh S, Sloan E, Chinn Z, Modesitt SC and Ring KL: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in endometrial cancer: A targetable mechanism of immune resistance in mismatch repair-deficient and intact endometrial carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 31:1282–1290. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Calviño-Sampedro C, Gomez-Tourino I, Cordero OJ, Reche PA, Gómez-Perosanz M, Sánchez-Trincado JL, Rodríguez MÁ, Sueiro AM, Viñuela JE and Calviño RV: Naturally presented HLA class I-restricted epitopes from the neurotrophic factor S100-β are targets of the autoimmune response in type 1 diabetes. FASEB J. 33:6390–6401. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liepe J, Marino F, Sidney J, Jeko A, Bunting DE, Sette A, Kloetzel PM, Stumpf MP, Heck AJ and Mishto M: A large fraction of HLA class I ligands are proteasome-generated spliced peptides. Science. 354:354–358. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chowell D, Morris LGT, Grigg CM, Weber JK, Samstein RM, Makarov V, Kuo F, Kendall SM, Requena D, Riaz N, et al: Patient HLA class I genotype influences cancer response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Science. 359:582–587. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
de Jong RA, Boerma A, Boezen HM, Mourits MJE, Hollema H and Nijman HW: Loss of HLA class I and mismatch repair protein expression in sporadic endometrioid endometrial carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 131:1828–1836. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Barrier BF, Kendall BS, Sharpe-Timms KL and Kost ER: Characterization of human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) expression in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 103:25–30. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bijen CB, Bantema-Joppe EJ, de Jong RA, Leffers N, Mourits MJ, Eggink HF, van der Zee AG, Hollema H, de Bock GH and Nijman HW: The prognostic role of classical and nonclassical MHC class I expression in endometrial cancer. Int J Cancer. 126:1417–1427. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin A and Yan WH: Heterogeneity of HLA-G expression in cancers: Facing the challenges. Front Immunol. 9:21642018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ben Yahia H, Babay W, Bortolotti D, Boujelbene N, Laaribi AB, Zidi N, Kehila M, Chelbi H, Boudabous A, Mrad K, et al: Increased plasmatic soluble HLA-G levels in endometrial cancer. Mol Immunol. 99:82–86. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sonoda K, Miyamoto S, Hirakawa T, Yagi H, Yotsumoto F, Nakashima M, Watanabe T and Nakano H: Association between RCAS1 expression and microenvironmental immune cell death in uterine cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 97:772–779. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakashima M, Sonoda K and Watanabe T: Inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptotic cell death by the human tumor-associated antigen RCAS1. Nat Med. 5:938–942. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Giaginis C, Giagini A and Theocharis S: Receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells (RCAS1): A novel biomarker in the diagnosis and prognosis of human neoplasia. Histol Histopathol. 24:761–776. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Sonoda K, Kaku T, Hirakawa T, Kobayashi H, Amada S, Sakai K, Nakashima M, Watanabe T and Nakano H: The clinical significance of tumor-associated antigen RCAS1 expression in the normal, hyperplastic, and malignant uterine endometrium. Gynecol Oncol. 79:424–429. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sonoda K, Miyamoto S, Hirakawa T, Kaku T, Nakashima M, Watanabe T, Akazawa K, Fujita T and Nakano H: Association between RCAS1 expression and clinical outcome in uterine endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer. 89:546–551. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Szubert S, Koper K, Dutsch-Wicherek MM and Kojs Z: The potential predictive value of serum srCaS1 levels for overall survival in endometrial cancer. Ginekol Pol. 90:134–140. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rand AA, Barnych B, Morisseau C, Cajka T, Lee KS, Panigrahy D and Hammock BD: Cyclooxygenase-derived proangiogenic metabolites of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 114:4370–4375. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Elling R, Robinson EK, Shapleigh B, Liapis SC, Covarrubias S, Katzman S, Groff AF, Jiang Z, Agarwal S, Motwani M, et al: Genetic models reveal cis and trans immune-regulatory activities for lincRNA-Cox2. Cell Reports. 25:1511–1524.e1516. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tang H, Liu Y, Wang C, Zheng H, Chen Y, Liu W, Chen X, Zhang J, Chen H, Yang Y, et al: Inhibition of COX-2 and EGFR by melafolone improves anti-PD-1 therapy through vascular normalization and PD-L1 downregulation in lung cancer. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 368:401–413. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohno Y, Ohno S, Suzuki N, Kamei T, Inagawa H, Soma G and Inoue M: Role of cyclooxygenase-2 in immunomodulation and prognosis of endometrial carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 114:696–701. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Suemori T, Susumu N, Iwata T, Banno K, Yamagami W, Hirasawa A, Sugano K, Matsumoto E and Aoki D: Intratumoral CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration as a prognostic factor and its relationship with cyclooxygenase 2 expression and microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 25:1165–1172. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ols ML, Cullen JL, Turqueti-Neves A, Giles J and Shlomchik MJ: Dendritic cells regulate extrafollicular autoreactive B cells via T cells expressing Fas and Fas ligand. Immunity. 45:1052–1065. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Das H, Koizumi T, Sugimoto T, Chakraborty S, Ichimura T, Hasegawa K and Nishimura R: Quantitation of Fas and Fas ligand gene expression in human ovarian, cervical and endometrial carcinomas using real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Br J Cancer. 82:1682–1688. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jia JJ, Wang ZN, Liu GX and Wang ZX: Apoptosis and expression of Fas/FasL in tumor infiltrating dendritic cells in human endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 31:1693–1696. 2011.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI | |
Rapoport AP, Aqui NA, Stadtmauer EA, Vogl DT, Fang HB, Cai L, Janofsky S, Chew A, Storek J, Akpek G, et al: Combination immunotherapy using adoptive T-cell transfer and tumor antigen vaccination on the basis of hTERT and survivin after ASCT for myeloma. Blood. 117:788–797. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Végran F, Mary R, Gibeaud A, Mirjolet C, Collin B, Oudot A, Charon-Barra C, Arnould L, Lizard-Nacol S and Boidot R: Survivin-3B potentiates immune escape in cancer but also inhibits the toxicity of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 73:5391–5401. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang Z, Liu Y and Liu M: Platelet-rich plasma injection is not more effective than hyaluronic acid to treat knee osteoarthritis when using a random-effects model. Br J Sports Med. 50:953–954. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chuwa AH, Sone K, Oda K, Ikeda Y, Fukuda T, Wada-Hiraike O, Inaba K, Makii C, Takeuchi M, Oki S, et al: Significance of survivin as a prognostic factor and a therapeutic target in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 141:564–569. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kumar A, Sirohi VK, Anum F, Singh PK, Gupta K, Gupta D, Saraf SA, Dwivedi A and Chourasia MK: Enhanced apoptosis, survivin down-regulation and assisted immunochemotherapy by curcumin loaded amphiphilic mixed micelles for subjugating endometrial cancer. Nanomedicine (Lond). 13:1953–1963. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kang S, Tanaka T, Narazaki M and Kishimoto T: Targeting Interleukin-6 Signaling in Clinic. Immunity. 50:1007–1023. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bellone S, Watts K, Cane' S, Palmieri M, Cannon MJ, Burnett A, Roman JJ, Pecorelli S and Santin AD: High serum levels of interleukin-6 in endometrial carcinoma are associated with uterine serous papillary histology, a highly aggressive and chemotherapy-resistant variant of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 98:92–98. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ren Y, Zhang Y, Liu RZ, Fenstermacher DA, Wright KL, Teer JK and Wu J: JAK1 truncating mutations in gynecologic cancer define new role of cancer-associated protein tyrosine kinase aberrations. Sci Rep. 3:30422013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Albacker LA, Wu J, Smith P, Warmuth M, Stephens PJ, Zhu P, Yu L and Chmielecki J: Loss of function JAK1 mutations occur at high frequency in cancers with microsatellite instability and are suggestive of immune evasion. PLoS One. 12:e01761812017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chao A, Tang YH, Lai CH, Chang CJ, Chang SC, Wu TI, Hsueh S, Wang CJ, Chou HH and Chang TC: Potential of an age-stratified CA125 cut-off value to improve the prognostic classification of patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 129:500–504. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hu J and Sun J: MUC16 mutations improve patients' prognosis by enhancing the infiltration and antitumor immunity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the endometrial cancer microenvironment. OncoImmunology. 7:e14879142018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Grotzke JE, Sengupta D, Lu Q and Cresswell P: The ongoing saga of the mechanism(s) of MHC class I-restricted cross-presentation. Curr Opin Immunol. 46:89–96. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen Y, Li H, Xiao C, Zeng X, Xiao X, Zhou Q and Xiao P: NLRC5: Potential novel non-invasive biomarker for predicting and reflecting the progression of IgA nephritis. J Transl Med. 16:3172018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshihama S, Roszik J, Downs I, Meissner TB, Vijayan S, Chapuy B, Sidiq T, Shipp MA, Lizee GA and Kobayashi KS: NLRC5/MHC class I transactivator is a target for immune evasion in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113:5999–6004. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mao Y, Poschke I, Wennerberg E, Pico de Coaña Y, Egyhazi Brage S, Schultz I, Hansson J, Masucci G, Lundqvist A and Kiessling R: Melanoma-educated CD14+ cells acquire a myeloid-derived suppressor cell phenotype through COX-2-dependent mechanisms. Cancer Res. 73:3877–3887. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sharma S, Yang SC, Zhu L, Reckamp K, Gardner B, Baratelli F, Huang M, Batra RK and Dubinett SM: Tumor cyclooxygenase-2/prostaglandin E2-dependent promotion of FOXP3 expression and CD4+ CD25+ T regulatory cell activities in lung cancer. Cancer Res. 65:5211–5220. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
St-Germain ME, Gagnon V, Parent S and Asselin E: Regulation of COX-2 protein expression by Akt in endometrial cancer cells is mediated through NF-kappaB/IkappaB pathway. Mol Cancer. 3:72004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mulati K, Hamanishi J, Matsumura N, Chamoto K, Mise N, Abiko K, Baba T, Yamaguchi K, Horikawa N, Murakami R, et al: VISTA expressed in tumour cells regulates T cell function. Br J Cancer. 120:115–127. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zsiros E and Odunsi K: Tumor-associated macrophages: Co-conspirators and orchestrators of immune suppression in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 135:173–175. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A and Locati M: The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 25:677–686. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshida N, Ino K, Ishida Y, Kajiyama H, Yamamoto E, Shibata K, Terauchi M, Nawa A, Akimoto H, Takikawa O, et al: Overexpression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in human endometrial carcinoma cells induces rapid tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model. Clin Cancer Res. 14:7251–7259. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Check JH and Cohen R: The role of progesterone and the progesterone receptor in human reproduction and cancer. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 8:469–484. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang L, Huang F, Mei J, Wang X, Zhang Q, Wang H, Xi M and You Z: Posttranscriptional control of PD-L1 expression by 17β-estradiol via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in ERα-positive cancer cell lines. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 27:196–205. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ning C, Xie B, Zhang L, Li C, Shan W, Yang B, Luo X, Gu C, He Q, Jin H, et al: Infiltrating macrophages induce ERα expression through an IL17A-mediated epigenetic mechanism to sensitize endometrial cancer cells to estrogen. Cancer Res. 76:1354–1366. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kaumaya PT, Foy KC, Garrett J, Rawale SV, Vicari D, Thurmond JM, Lamb T, Mani A, Kane Y, Balint CR, et al: Phase I active immunotherapy with combination of two chimeric, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, B-cell epitopes fused to a promiscuous T-cell epitope in patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 27:5270–5277. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohno S, Kyo S, Myojo S, Dohi S, Ishizaki J, Miyamoto K, Morita S, Sakamoto J, Enomoto T, Kimura T, et al: Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) peptide immunotherapy for gynecological malignancy. Anticancer Res. 29:4779–4784. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jäger E, Karbach J, Gnjatic S, Neumann A, Bender A, Valmori D, Ayyoub M, Ritter E, Ritter G, Jäger D, et al: Recombinant vaccinia/fowlpox NY-ESO-1 vaccines induce both humoral and cellular NY-ESO-1-specific immune responses in cancer patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:14453–14458. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Howitt BE, Shukla SA, Sholl LM, Ritterhouse LL, Watkins JC, Rodig S, Stover E, Strickland KC, D'Andrea AD, Wu CJ, et al: Association of Polymerase e-Mutated and Microsatellite-Instable Endometrial Cancers With Neoantigen Load, Number of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1. JAMA Oncol. 1:1319–1323. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mehnert JM, Panda A, Zhong H, Hirshfield K, Damare S, Lane K, Sokol L, Stein MN, Rodriguez-Rodriquez L, Kaufman HL, et al: Immune activation and response to pembrolizumab in POLE-mutant endometrial cancer. J Clin Invest. 126:2334–2340. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ott PA, Bang YJ, Berton-Rigaud D, Elez E, Pishvaian MJ, Rugo HS, Puzanov I, Mehnert JM, Aung KL, Lopez J, et al: Safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in advanced programmed death ligand 1-positive endometrial cancer: Results from the KEYNOTE-028 study. J Clin Oncol. 35:2535–2541. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Osterman C, McCarthy MBR, Cote MP, Beitzel K, Bradley J, Polkowski G and Mazzocca AD: Platelet-rich plasma increases anti-inflammatory markers in a human coculture model for osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 43:1474–1484. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Makker V, Rasco D, Vogelzang NJ, Brose MS, Cohn AL, Mier J, Di Simone C, Hyman DM, Stepan DE, Dutcus CE, et al: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: An interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20:711–718. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tran E, Turcotte S, Gros A, Robbins PF, Lu YC, Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Somerville RP, Hogan K, Hinrichs CS, et al: Cancer immunotherapy based on mutation-specific CD4+ T cells in a patient with epithelial cancer. Science. 344:641–645. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
de Bono JS, Concin N, Hong DS, Thistlethwaite FC, Machiels JP, Arkenau HT, Plummer R, Jones RH, Nielsen D, Windfeld K, et al: Tisotumab vedotin in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumours (InnovaTV 201): A first-in-human, multicentre, phase 1–2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20:383–393. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tuyaerts S, Van Nuffel AMT, Naert E, Van Dam PA, Vuylsteke P, De Caluwé A, Aspeslagh S, Dirix P, Lippens L, De Jaeghere E, et al: PRIMMO study protocol: A phase II study combining PD-1 blockade, radiation and immunomodulation to tackle cervical and uterine cancer. BMC Cancer. 19:5062019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pakish JB, Zhang Q, Chen Z, Liang H, Chisholm GB, Yuan Y, Mok SC, Broaddus RR, Lu KH and Yates MS: Immune microenvironment in microsatellite-instable endometrial cancers: Hereditary or sporadic origin matters. Clin Cancer Res. 23:4473–4481. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Temko D, Van Gool IC, Rayner E, Glaire M, Makino S, Brown M, Chegwidden L, Palles C, Depreeuw J, Beggs A, et al: Somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations are early events in sporadic endometrial and colorectal carcinogenesis, determining driver mutational landscape, clonal neoantigen burden and immune response. J Pathol. 245:283–296. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eggink FA, Van Gool IC, Leary A, Pollock PM, Crosbie EJ, Mileshkin L, Jordanova ES, Adam J, Freeman-Mills L, Church DN, et al: Immunological profiling of molecularly classified high-risk endometrial cancers identifies POLE-mutant and microsatellite unstable carcinomas as candidates for checkpoint inhibition. OncoImmunology. 6:e12645652016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Talhouk A, Derocher H, Schmidt P, Leung S, Milne K, Gilks CB, Anglesio MS, Nelson BH and McAlpine JN: Molecular subtype not immune response drives outcomes in endometrial carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 25:2537–2548. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mullen MM and Mutch DG: Endometrial tumor immune response: Predictive biomarker of response to immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 25:2366–2368. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
DeLong P, Tanaka T, Kruklitis R, Henry AC, Kapoor V, Kaiser LR, Sterman DH and Albelda SM: Use of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 63:7845–7852. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Han Y, Qin W and Huang G: Knockdown of RCAS1 expression by RNA interference recovers T cell growth and proliferation. Cancer Lett. 257:182–190. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cocco E, Hu Z, Richter CE, Bellone S, Casagrande F, Bellone M, Todeschini P, Krikun G, Silasi DA, Azodi M, et al: hI-con1, a factor VII–IgGFc chimeric protein targeting tissue factor for immunotherapy of uterine serous papillary carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 103:812–819. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Varughese J, Cocco E, Bellone S, de Leon M, Bellone M, Todeschini P, Schwartz PE, Rutherford TJ, Pecorelli S and Santin AD: Uterine serous papillary carcinomas overexpress human trophoblast-cell-surface marker (Trop-2) and are highly sensitive to immunotherapy with hRS7, a humanized anti-Trop-2 monoclonal antibody. Cancer. 117:3163–3172. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vanderstraeten A, Everaert T, Van Bree R, Verbist G, Luyten C, Amant F and Tuyaerts S: In vitro validation of survivin as target tumor-associated antigen for immunotherapy in uterine cancer. J Immunother. 38:239–249. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dijkgraaf EM, Santegoets SJ, Reyners AK, Goedemans R, Wouters MC, Kenter GG, van Erkel AR, van Poelgeest MI, Nijman HW, van der Hoeven JJ, et al: A phase I trial combining carboplatin/doxorubicin with tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6R monoclonal antibody, and interferon-α2b in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 26:2141–2149. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rader JS, Aylsworth CF, Juckett DA, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Lippmann L and Dimitrov NV: Phase I study and preliminary pharmacology of the novel innate immune modulator rBBX-01 in gynecologic cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 14:3089–3097. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |