Analysis of changes in the expression of Notch1 and HES1 and the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients following surgery
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 17, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11890
- Article Number: 29
Abstract
Introduction
Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant tumor among children, adolescents and young adults (1). Osteosarcoma originates from primary bone-forming mesenchymal cells, accounting for 20% of all primary osteosarcoma, and is the most common primary bone malignant tumor (2). Osteosarcoma usually occurs in the long bone of limbs near the metaphyseal plate. The most common sites are the femur, tibia and humerus (3). Before 1970, the treatment for osteosarcoma was mainly surgical resection. With the application of multi-drug regimens, chemotherapy has markedly improved the 5-year survival rate of patients with localized osteosarcoma from <20 to 65%; however, its prognosis is still very poor (4). Moreover, the mortality rate of patients with recurrent and metastatic osteosarcoma is still very high. Therefore, it of utmost importance to explore novel prognostic factors for osteosarcoma patients, particularly those diagnosed with metastatic disease.
Notch1 is a type 1 transmembrane receptor protein, which is important for cell fate regulation, the differentiation of various systems and neuronal development, such as neurogenesis and the maintenance of neural stem cells (5). The increased expression of Notch1 is related to the low survival rate of patients with various types of cancer (6–8). The proliferation of cells from these types of cancer can be inhibited by the pharmacological inhibition of Notch1. Therefore, preventing the occurrence of Notch1 is a potential strategy for the treatment of various types of cancers (9). The transcription factor hairy and enhancer of split-1 (HES1) is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix (BHLH) of transcription inhibitor family, and is the downstream target of Notch signal pathway (10). HES1 is overexpressed in a number of tumor types, including colon cancer (11), breast cancer (12), non-small cell lung cancer (13), etc., suggesting that HES1 has carcinogenic activity and is closely associated with cancer.
Therefore, the present study examined the changes in the expression of Notch1 and HES1 in osteosarcoma patients following surgery. The correlation between Notch1 expression and HES1 expression, and its association with prognosis were also investigated, so as to identify novel potential diagnostic and treatment targets that may be used clinical practice.
Patients and methods
General patient information
In the present study, samples from 62 patients with osteosarcoma treated at Shandong Cancer Hospital from April, 2011 to June, 2013 were collected as the research group, and those from 52 healthy individuals undergoing a physical examination were collected as the control group. There were 33 males and 29 females in the research group, with an average age of 18.6±10.1 years, while the control group consisted of 28 males and 24 females with an average age of 19.1±10.3 years. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Cancer Hospital. Signed written informed consents were obtained from the patients and/or parents or guardians.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were as follows: Patients who met the ESMO diagnostic criteria (14), or received treatment at Shandong Cancer Hospital after diagnosis; patients who did not receive radiotherapy or chemotherapy prior to surgery; patients who did not receive any treatment within 30 days after surgery; patients aged between 10 to 40 years; patients with complete case data; patients who agreed to cooperate with the work arrangement of the medical staff at Shandong Cancer Hospital; patients or their immediate family members signed informed consents.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: Patients who died during the course of treatment; patients with injury to important organs; patients suffering from other cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, as well as any physical disability; pregnant mothers; patients suffering from other autoimmune diseases and chronic diseases; patients transferred to Shandong Cancer Hospital; patients with contraindications to surgery, mental diseases and language dysfunction.
Surgical treatment plan
The patients were subjected to limb preservation surgery according to the strategies outlined in the study by Ando et al (15) and references listed in that study.
Blood sample processing
Before surgery and at 30 days after surgery, early in the morning on an empty stomach, venous blood was drawn and stored at 4°C for 30 min, and the serum samples were then centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C (1,500 × g). The supernatant was then extracted and stored in a refrigerator at −80°C.
Main reagents
Notch1 and HES1 kits were purchased from Wuhan Feien Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (cat. nos. EH0926 and EH3223), and were used strictly in accordance with the operating instructions provided with the kits. The Eppendorf CryoCube F740hi ultra-low temperature refrigerator was purchased from Eppendorf Co., Ltd. (cat. no. ep000000).
Follow-up of patients
The patients were followed-up for 5 years, and their survival rates were recorded via telephone communications and outpatient medical records. The follow-up time points were the 3rd, 6, 9 and 12th month of each year.
Observation indicators
The main observation indicators were as follows: The expression levels of Notch1 and HES1 in osteosarcoma patients before and after surgery were observed, and the diagnostic value of Notch1 and HES1 in osteosarcoma was determined.
The secondary observation indicators were the following: Pearson's correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between Notch1 expression and HES1 expression in osteosarcoma patients. According to the expression levels of Notch1 and HES1 (obtained by ELISA), the patients were divided into the high and low expression groups, and the 5-year survival rate of the patients was observed.
Statistical analysis
In the present study, the SPSS20.0 software package was used to perform the statistical analysis on the collected data. The GraphPad 7 software package was used to obtain the required graphs, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to analyze the distribution of these data, in which normally distribution data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (means ± SD). Inter-group comparisons were conducted using an independent-samples t-test, and intra-group comparisons were conducted using a paired t-test. Count data are expressed as a percentage (%) and analyzed using the Chi-squared (χ2) test. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was created to plot the diagnostic value of Notch1 and HES1 in osteosarcoma, which was represented by the χ2 value. Cut-off values were calculated using Youden's index (YI) calculation formula as follows: YI=[a/(a + c) + d/(b + d)]-1. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between Notch1 expression and HES1 expression in the osteosarcoma patients. The 5-year survival of the patients was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and data were analyzed using the log-rank test. In addition, univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to analyze the independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of the patients. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Clinical data
No significant differences were observed in the clinical data of the research group and the control group, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), marital status, nationality, place of residence, smoking, alcohol consumption and exercise, which proved comparability (P>0.05), as shown in Table I.
Expression levels of Notch1 and HES1 in osteosarcoma patients before and after surgery
The expression levels of Notch1 and HES1 in the osteosarcoma patients before surgery were 15.03±1.35 and 13.86±1.53, while the expression levels of Notch1 and HES1 in the osteosarcoma patients after surgery were 4.12±1.01 and 5.02±0.99, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the comparisons of Notch1 and HES1 expression levels before and after surgery (P<0.05), as shown in Fig. 1.
Diagnostic value of Notch1 and HES1 expression in osteosarcoma
ROC curve analysis demonstrated that when the cut-off value was 13.230, the sensitivity, specificity and AUC of Notch1 in the diagnosis of osteosarcoma were 93.55%, 58.06% and 0.732, respectively (P<0.001); when the cut-off value was 12.810, the sensitivity, specificity and AUC of HES1 in the diagnosis of osteosarcoma were 82.26%, 61.29% and 0.766, respectively (P<0.001), as shown in Table II and Fig. 2.
Correlation between Notch1 and HES1 expression in patients with osteosarcoma
Pearson's correlation analysis identified that the expression level of Notch1 positively correlated with that of HES1 in the osteosarcoma patients (r=0.795, P<0.001), 95% CI: 0.681-0.872, as shown in Fig. 3.
High and low expression levels of Notch1 and HES1, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with osteosarcoma
The patients in the present study were then divided into the Notch1 high expression group (≥16.57), the HES1 high expression group (≥15.18) (31 cases), the Notch1 low expression group (<16.57) and the HES1 low expression group (<15.18) (31 cases) according to the median value of the expression levels of Notch1 and HES1. All the patients were interviewed at follow-up. In the Notch1 and HES1 low expression groups, 10 patients died, with a 5-year survival rate of 67.74%; there were 16 patients that died in the high expression group, with a 5-year survival rate of 48.39%. The survival rate of the patients in the low expression group was significantly higher than that of the patients in the high expression group (P=0.045), as shown in Fig. 4.
Univariate logistic regression analysis
The patients were divided into the survival group (36 cases) and the mortality group (26 cases) according to their survival conditions. Univariate analysis based on the clinical data of the survival group and mortality group illustrated that there were no significant differences in age, sex and TNM staging between the groups (P>0.05). Significant differences were observed for in tumor location, chemotherapy response, tumor size, and Notch1 and HES1 expression (P<0.05), as shown in Table III.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis
Multivariate difference indicators (tumor location, chemotherapy response and tumor size) were assigned, as shown in Table IV. Subsequently, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to confirm tumor location (OR, 3.521; 95% CI, 1.061-3.183), chemotherapy response (OR, 5.020; 95% CI, 0.218-0.675), tumor size (OR, 3.227; 95% CI, 1.072-2.901), Notch1 expression (OR, 4.019; 95% CI, 1.467-4.218) and HES1 expression (OR, 4.629; 95% CI, 1.353-5.727). Tumor location, chemotherapy response and tumor size, and Notch1 and HES1 expression were independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients, as shown in Table V.
Discussion
Osteosarcoma is one of the most common primary malignant bone diseases, which severely threatens the health of children and adolescents (16). It has a high tendency of local invasion and early systemic metastasis, such as lung metastasis (17,18). Its morbidity rate is high, mainly among children and adolescents aged between 10 and 25 years, whose skeleton is growing rapidly, accounting for 70% of all osteosarcoma cases (19). Osteosarcoma has a high malignancy and a poor prognosis. According to statistics, approximately 85% of osteosarcoma patients exhibit metastasis (20). Chen et al (21) and Shin et al (22) demonstrated that the 5-year survival rate of non-metastatic patients increased to 55–70% with the application of high-dose combination chemotherapy. However, the 5-year survival rate of metastatic patients was only 5–20%. Although the survival rate of osteosarcoma patients has improved, there certain serious issues still exist, including severe side-effects and recurrent or metastatic disease (23). Therefore, it is of utmost importance to identify effective indicators for the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma.
Notch1 is an evolutionarily conserved ligand-receptor signaling system that regulates cell proliferation, survival, apoptosis and differentiation (24,25). The dysfunction of the Notch1 signaling pathway may lead to abnormal differentiation or undifferentiation, and may eventually lead to the malignant transformation of these cells. Of note, it has been revealed that changes in Notch1 signaling are associated with a number of human cancers (26–28); however, the role of Notch1 in osteosarcoma has yet not been elucidated. HES1 is a highly conserved basic helix-loop-helix transcription inhibitor, which mediates its biological effects by binding to N-cassettes (CACNAG) in the entire genome and recruiting chromatin modification factors to these sites (29,30). HES1 is necessary for organogenesis and development of several species as a component of Notch1 (31,32). However, the molecular function of HES1 in adult tissues remains unclear. Therefore, by investigating the clinical diagnostic values of Notch1 and HES1 in osteosarcoma patients and their influence on prognosis, this may provide the basis for the future clinical diagnosis and treatment of osteosarcoma.
In the present study the expression levels of Notch1 and HES1 in osteosarcoma patients before and after surgery, we first observed. It was found that Notch1 and HES1 in osteosarcoma patients after surgery exhibited a low expression, which differed significantly from that before surgery. This indicated that Notch1 and HES1 may become potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets for osteosarcoma. Therefore, a ROC curve was then drawn and it was found that the areas under the Notch1 and HES1 curves were 0.732 and 0.766, respectively, which were not associated with a high specificity, but with a high sensitivity and were clinical diagnostic indicators of osteosarcoma. Zhang et al (33) found a new regulatory pathway of invasion and metastasis in osteosarcoma, as well as a novel function of the Notch pathway: The regulation of metastasis. As the Notch pathway can be pharmacologically inhibited, these findings suggest possible novel therapeutic strategies with which to reduce the invasion and metastasis of osteosarcoma. Subsequently, Pearson's correlation analysis demonstrated that the expression level of Notch1 positively correlated with the expression level of HES1 in osteosarcoma patients (r=0.795, P<0.001). The patients were further divided into the high and low expression groups according to the median value of the expression levels of Notch1 and HES1 in osteosarcoma. Observing the 5-year survival rate of the patients, it was found that the 5-year survival rate of the patients in the Notch1 and HES1 high expression groups was 48.39%, and that of the patients in the Notch1 and HES1 low expression groups was 67.74%. The higher the expression levels of Notch1 and HES1, the lower the survival rate of the osteosarcoma patients, suggesting that Notch1 and HES1 may be used as prognostic survival indicators of osteosarcoma patients. Finally, it was found that tumor location, chemotherapy response, tumor size, and Notch1 and HES1 expression were independent prognostic factors of patients through logistic multivariate analysis, which indicated that tumor location, chemotherapy response, tumor size, Notch1, HES1 and may be used as prognostic indicators for patients with osteosarcoma.
The present study preliminarily proved the clinical value of Notch1 and HES1 through the above-mentioned findings. However, there are still certain limitations to this research. First, tissue samples were not collected and basic cell experiments were not performed. Second, no animal experiments were conducted. Thus, the authors aim to conduct further in-depth experimental analyses as soon to confirm and further broaden the findings of the present study.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that Notch1 and HES1 were highly expressed in osteosarcoma patients. Notch1 and HES1 as indicators exhibited a good diagnostic efficacy, as shown by ROC curve analysis, and Notch1 and HES1 expression were strongly associated with the occurrence and development of osteosarcoma. Thus, they may prove to be efficient markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma. These findings may provide future reference and insight into future studies on osteosarcoma.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
LF, BL, DY and TZ were involved in the conception and design of the study. LF, BL, DY, BW and TZ were responsible for data collection and analysis. LF, BW and TZ were responsible for the interpretation of the data and for drafting the manuscript. LF and TZ made revisions from a critical perspective for important intellectual content. All authors have read and confirmed the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Cancer Hospital. Signed written informed consents were obtained from the patients and/or parents or guardians.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Moore DD and Luu HH: Osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res. 162:65–92. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Harrison DJ, Geller DS, Gill JD, Lewis VO and Gorlick R: Current and future therapeutic approaches for osteosarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 18:39–50. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ottaviani G and Jaffe N: The epidemiology of osteosarcoma. Pediatric and adolescent osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res. 152:3–13. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lamora A, Talbot J, Bougras G, Amiaud J, Leduc M, Chesneau J, Taurelle J, Stresing V, Le Deley MC, Heymann MF, et al: Overexpression of smad7 blocks primary tumor growth and lung metastasis development in osteosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 20:5097–5112. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD and Lake RJ: Notch signaling: Cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science. 284:770–776. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pece S, Serresi M, Santolini E, Capra M, Hulleman E, Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Maisonneuve P, Viale G and Di Fiore PP: Loss of negative regulation by Numb over Notch is relevant to human breast carcinogenesis. J Cell Biol. 167:215–221. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li Y, Zhang J, Ma D, Zhang L, Si M, Yin H and Li J: Curcumin inhibits proliferation and invasion of osteosarcoma cells through inactivation of Notch-1 signaling. FEBS J. 279:2247–2259. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Diévart A, Beaulieu N and Jolicoeur P: Involvement of Notch1 in the development of mouse mammary tumors. Oncogene. 18:5973–5981. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Garber K: Notch emerges as new cancer drug target. J Natl Cancer Inst. 99:1284–1285. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang SC, Lin XL, Wang HY, Qin YJ, Chen L, Li J, Jia JS, Shen HF, Yang S, Xie RY, et al: Hes1 triggers epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like cellular marker alterations and promotes invasion and metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by activating the PTEN/AKT pathway. Oncotarget. 6:36713–36730. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Candy PA, Phillips MR, Redfern AD, Colley SM, Davidson JA, Stuart LM, Wood BA, Zeps N and Leedman PJ: Notch-Induced transcription factors are predictive of survival and 5-fluorouracil response in colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 109:1023–1030. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Farnie G, Clarke RB, Spence K, Pinnock N, Brennan K, Anderson NG and Bundred NJ: Novel cell culture technique for primary ductal carcinoma in situ: Role of Notch and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways. J Natl Cancer Inst. 99:616–627. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Konishi J, Kawaguchi KS, Vo H, Haruki N, Gonzalez A, Carbone DP and Dang TP: Gamma-secretase inhibitor prevents Notch3 activation and reduces proliferation in human lung cancers. Cancer Res. 67:8051–8057. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bielack S, Carrle D and Casali PG; ESMO Guidelines Working Group, : Osteosarcoma: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 20 (Suppl 4):S137–S139. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ando K, Heymann MF, Stresing V, Mori K, Rédini F and Heymann D: Current therapeutic strategies and novel approaches in osteosarcoma. Cancers (Basel). 5:591–616. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sampson VB, Yoo S, Kumar A, Vetter NS and Kolb EA: MicroRNAs and potential targets in osteosarcoma: Review. Front Pediatr. 3:692015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao H, Yao Y, Wang Z, Lin F, Sun Y and Chen P: Therapeutic effect of pirarubicin-based chemotherapy for osteosarcoma patients with lung metastasis. J Chemother. 22:119–124. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
He A, Yang X, Huang Y, Feng T, Wang Y, Sun Y, Shen Z and Yao Y: CD133(+) CD44(+) cells mediate in the lung metastasis of osteosarcoma. J Cell Biochem. 116:1719–1729. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Daw NC, Chou AJ, Jaffe N, Rao BN, Billups CA, Rodriguez- Galindo C, Meyers PA and Huh WW: Recurrent osteosarcoma with a single pulmonary metastasis: A multi-institutional review. Br J Cancer. 112:278–282. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Faisham WI, Mat Saad AZ, Alsaigh LN, Nor Azman MZ, Kamarul Imran M, Biswal BM, Bhavaraju VM, Salzihan MS, Hasnan J, Ezane AM, et al: Prognostic factors and survival rate of osteosarcoma: A single-institution study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 13:e104–e110. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen J, Ma L and Wei G: Comment on Fu et al.: A systematic review of p53 as a biomarker of survival in patients with osteosarcoma. Tumour Biol. 35:5049–5050. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shin SH, Jeong HJ, Han I, Cho HS and Kim HS: Osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma of the shoulder: Site-Specific comparative analysis. Orthopedics. 36:e179–e185. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
He H, Ni J and Huang J: Molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance in osteosarcoma (Review). Oncol Lett. 7:1352–1362. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miele L: Notch signaling. Clin Cancer Res. 12:1074–1079. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chiba S: Notch signaling in stem cell systems. Stem Cells. 24:2437–2447. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Villanueva A, Alsinet C, Yanger K, Hoshida Y, Zong Y, Toffanin S, Rodriguez-Carunchio L, Solé M, Thung S, Stanger BZ and Llovet JM: Notch signaling is activated in human hepatocellular carcinoma and induces tumor formation in mice. Gastroenterology. 143:1660–1669.e7. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bocchicchio S, Tesone M and Irusta G: Convergence of wnt and notch signaling controls ovarian cancer cell survival. J Cell Physiol. 234:22130–22143. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lai XX, Li G, Lin B and Yang H: Interference of Notch 1 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of breast cancer cells: Involvement of the β-catenin signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 17:2472–2478. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Takebayashi K, Sasai Y, Sakai Y, Watanabe T, Nakanishi S and Kageyama R: Structure, chromosomal locus, and promoter analysis of the gene encoding the mouse helix-loop-helix factor HES-1. Negative autoregulation through the multiple N box elements. J Biol Chem. 269:5150–5156. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Sasai Y, Kageyama R, Tagawa Y, Shigemoto R and Nakanishi S: Two mammalian helix-loop-helix factors structurally related to Drosophila hairy and enhancer of split. Genes Dev. 6:2620–2634. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ishibashi M, Ang SL, Shiota K, Nakanishi S, Kageyama R and Guillemot F: Targeted disruption of mammalian hairy and Enhancer of split homolog-1 (HES-1) leads to up-regulation of neural helix-loop-helix factors, premature neurogenesis, and severe neural tube defects. Genes Dev. 9:3136–3148. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohtsuka T, Ishibashi M, Gradwohl G, Nakanishi S, Guillemot F and Kageyama R: Hes1 and Hes5 as notch effectors in mammalian neuronal differentiation. EMBO J. 18:2196–2207. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang P, Yang Y, Zweidler-McKay PA and Hughes DP: Critical role of notch signaling in osteosarcoma invasion and metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 14:2962–2969. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |