Antitumor effects of ribavirin in combination with TMZ and IFN‑β in malignant glioma cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: August 31, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12039
- Article Number: 178
-
Copyright: © Ochiai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Although advances in multimodal therapies including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are being made, the prognosis for glioblastomas, the most common primary brain tumor in adults and classified as having WHO grade IV malignancy, has not improved adequately for more than 30 years. In 2009, the EORTC/NCIC reported final results indicating the benefits of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ: a relatively new alkylating agent) in addition to standard postoperative radiotherapy for glioblastomas (1). Subsequently, concomitant radiotherapy with TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy has become the current and global standard treatment for malignant gliomas, especially glioblastomas. Even though such treatments show a survival benefit in glioblastoma patients, the prognosis deriving from these therapies remains unsatisfactory.
Ribavirin, first reported in 1972 by Sidwell et al (2) as an anti-viral agent, is a nucleic acid analog. To date, ribavirin has served as a therapeutic agent widely used against RNA and DNA viruses, and is in particular one of the standard agents for chronic hepatitis C combined with interferon (3). On the other hand, we and others have recently observed an anti-tumor effect of ribavirin on various tumor cells, including breast cancer, acute myeloid leukemia, and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors, which is thought to be mediated via inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), histone methyltransferase enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK), and/or mitogen-activated protein kinase interacting protein kinase 1 (MNK1) (3–11). To date, there have been only a few studies on the anti-tumor effect of ribavirin against glioma cells. Volpin et al (9) reported an anti-tumor effect of ribavirin including in combination with TMZ and irradiation on glioma cells and glioma stem-like cells in vivo and in vitro. More recently, we demonstrated an effect of ribavirin on apoptosis induction, cell cycle arrest, p53 pathway activation, and DNA damage (double-strand breaks: DSBs) in malignant glioma cell lines (10).
In the present study, we obtained further data by examining the effect of ribavirin in combination with TMZ and interferon-beta (IFN-β) on malignant glioma cells. The reasons for using TMZ and IFN-β in combination with ribavirin were that TMZ is a standard chemotherapeutic agent for glioblastomas as mentioned above, and IFN-β exhibits pleiotrophic biological activities against neoplasias (12–15) and acts as a drug sensitizer enhancing the anti-tumor effect when administered in combination with nitrosoureas (alkylating agents) against malignant gliomas (16). Furthermore, a synergistic anti-tumor effect between TMZ and IFN-β has been demonstrated in malignant glioma cells (17–19), and a significant anti-tumor effect of ribavirin in combination with IFN-α (grouped to type I IFNs, the same as IFN-β) has been observed in hepatoma cells and renal carcinoma cells (20,21). Based on the findings of the present study, the combination of these three agents could exert a synergistic anti-tumor effect in malignant glioma cells and provide an experimental basis for rational clinical treatments in glioblastoma patients.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and cell culture
Human malignant glioma cells of the A-172 (cell no. JCRB0228, lot no. 021999), AM-38 (cell no. IFO50492, lot no. 12082003), T98G (cell no. IFO50303, lot no. 1007), U-251MG (cell no. IFO50288, lot no. 12132002), and YH-13 (cell no. IFO50493, lot no. 1164) cell lines were obtained from Health Science Research Resources Bank (Osaka, Japan), and U-87MG (glioblastoma of unknown origin; catalog no.: HTB-14, lot no. 2497162) and U-138MG (catalog no. HTB-16, lot no. 1104428) were procured from the American Type Culture Collection. It has been confirmed by us that O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT: a key factor of alkylating agents) is expressed in T98G, U-138MG and YH-13 by RT-PCR and western blot analysis in a previous study (22). Consistent with an earlier report (23), it was also confirmed that T98G (237 Met→Ile) and U-251MG (273 Arg→His) have a point mutation of the p53 gene. These cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Nissui Pharmaceutical) containing 10% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies) using plastic culture flasks (Corning®) in a standard humidified incubator at 37°C under a 5% CO2, 95% air atmosphere.
Cell culture growth studies
Malignant glioma cell proliferation was evaluated using a Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter) to determine the cell numbers in 24-well plates (Iwaki). Each well was seeded with 1×104 cells and cultured for 24 h prior to treatment to allow adherence of the cells to the plate. The culture medium was replenished with fresh medium containing ribavirin (0.1–100 µM; Sigma) alone, or in combination with TMZ (10 µM; LKT Laboratories) and IFN-β (10 IU/ml; Toray), and the cells were cultured for 72 h. We selected the incubation conditions as 10 µM TMZ and/or 10 IU/ml IFN-β, because these values represent clinically achievable concentrations of TMZ and IFN-β (19,24). Furthermore, in order to assess whether the effect of the combination of these agents, TMZ, IFN-β, and/or ribavirin, was synergistic, the ribavirin was set at a clinically relevant concentration of 10 µM (25). The proliferated cells were harvested with trypsin-EDTA solution (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and the numbers counted. The cell culture growth experiments were repeated a minimum of four times each.
Synergism of drug combination treatment
Moreover, to confirm whether the anti-tumor effect of the combination with TMZ, IFN-β, and ribavirin was synergistic, a combination index (CI) was also calculated using the Chou-Talalay method (26). In the present study, we decided to calculate the CI at 50% inhibition of cell proliferation (IC50). Two malignant glioma cell lines, A-172 and U-251MG, were therefore employed to calculate the CI, because their IC50 values had been obtained on the basis of dose response curves. The IC50 of TMZ, IFN-β, and ribavirin for A-172 was 52.4 µM, 57.5 IU/ml, and 53.6 µM, and for U-251 was 22.5 µM, 26.4 IU/ml, and 257.7 µM, respectively (7,15,22). Based on the Chou-Talalay method, CI values of less than 1 are indicative of synergism (the smaller the value, the greater the degree of synergy), those equal to 1 indicate additivity, and those of more than 1 are interpreted as antagonism. Values of CI < 0.4, between 0.4 and 0.8, and >0.8 indicate strong, medium and slight synergism, respectively (26,27). An additive effect is defined as a situation in which the final effect is equal to the sum of the effects of the drugs. Drug interactions are interpreted as antagonistic if they lead to a decrease in the effects of one or both drugs (26,27).
Assessment of apoptosis
From the results for the growth inhibitory effect and CI, U-251MG cells were subjected to further experiments. Apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry, using dual staining with an Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences). Cells were seeded in 6-well plates (Iwaki) at 1×106 cells and incubated for 24 h to adhere. The culture medium was then replenished with fresh medium containing ribavirin, TMZ, IFN-β, TMZ and IFN-β, or TMZ, IFN-β and ribavirin for 72 h (ribavirin, 10 µM; TMZ, 10 µM; IFN-β, 10 IU/ml). The cells were next washed in PBS and harvested using trypsin-EDTA solution. Following centrifugation and washing in PBS, the solution was agitated with 100 ml of binding buffer (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.), into which 5 µl of Annexin V Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 10 µl of PI (Miltenyi Biotech) were added, and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. An additional 400 µl of binding buffer was added to give a total sample volume of 500 µl. The fluorescence was measured with an FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson). The apoptotic cells were analyzed using Flowjo software (BioLegend). The experiments were repeated three times to confirm reproducibility.
Statistical analysis
Appropriate comparisons were made employing one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey-Kramer method among multiple comparisons using the software Stat View (Ver. 5.0; SAS Institute Inc.). Data were expressed as the means ± standard error and were considered significant at P<0.05.
Results
Anti-tumor effects of a combination of ribavirin with TMZ and IFN-β
We have previously demonstrated an anti-tumor effect of ribavirin on malignant glioma cell lines (7). In that study, seven malignant glioma cell lines were exposed to 0.1–1,000 µM of ribavirin and treated for 72 h, and it was found that ribavirin inhibited the growth of all seven cell lines in a dose-dependent manner (7).
To assess whether or not a combination of ribavirin with TMZ and IFN-β could produce a more profound anti-tumor effect as compared to ribavirin alone in malignant glioma cell lines, cells were incubated in culture medium containing various concentrations (0–100 IU/ml) of ribavirin alone or ribavirin with TMZ (10 µM) and IFN-β (10 IU/ml) for 72 h. As shown in Fig. 1, the combination of ribavirin with TMZ (10 µM) and IFN-β (10 IU/ml) revealed a significant cell growth inhibitory effect with a ribavirin dose-dependency in all seven malignant glioma cell lines. Such a cell growth inhibitory effect was also observed at a relative low concentration of ribavirin, 0.1 and 1 µM. Furthermore, it was evident at 0.1 µM of ribavirin in AM-38, T98G, U-87MG, and U-251MG cells.
In addition, we examined whether the combination of TMZ, IFN-β, and ribavirin displayed an enhanced cell growth inhibitory effect as compared to the control, TMZ alone, or TMZ and IFN-β. As demonstrated in Fig. 2, the cell growth inhibitory effect at 72 h was significantly higher in the group treated with TMZ (10 µM), IFN-β (10 IU/ml), and ribavirin (10 µM) as compared to the group treated with TMZ alone in all seven malignant glioma cell lines. Furthermore, the combination of TMZ, IFN-β and ribavirin exerted a significantly enhanced growth inhibitory effect as compared to TMZ and IFN-β in the AM-38, U-87MG, U-138MG, and YH-13 cells.
Drug synergy analysis of a combination of ribavirin with TMZ and IFN-β
Our results indicated that the combination of TMZ, IFN-β and ribavirin displayed significant growth inhibition in malignant glioma cells. When TMZ, IFN-β, and ribavirin were applied in combination, a synergistic effect was detected as analyzed by the Chou-Talalay method in malignant glioma cells. The CI value was 0.68 (medium synergism) in A-172 and 0.98 (slight synergism) in U-251MG at the IC50 level, respectively.
Apoptosis induced by a combination of TMZ, IFN-β, and ribavirin in U-251MG cells
The induction of apoptosis by TMZ, IFN-β, ribavirin, TMZ and IFN-β, or TMZ, IFN-β and ribavirin in U-251MG cells was examined by Annexin V/PI double staining and evaluated using flow cytometry. The distribution of apoptotic cells (Annexin V-positive, early-stage apoptosis; Annexin V/PI-positive, late-stage apoptosis) after 72 h treatment is illustrated in Fig. 3. In particular, the proportion of Annexin V/PI positive cells (late-stage apoptosis) following treatment with three agents (TMZ, IFN-β and ribavirin; mean=10.56%) was higher than that for each single agent (means: TMZ, 5.57%; IFN-β, 5.74%; and ribavirin, 5.57%, respectively). The results indicated that the apoptotic cells after treatment with three agents tend to be increased, showing an elevation of more than 2% between each treatment, in U-251MG cells. However, the fact that statistically significant differences were not found among the treatments might reflect the small numbers in each group.
Discussion
TMZ has become the current first-line chemotherapeutic agent, but it does not provide satisfactory benefits for glioblastoma patients. Further studies are needed to improve the clinical therapeutic efficacy and to establish a therapeutic strategy for glioblastomas. On the other hand, we demonstrated a dose-dependent anti-tumor efficacy of ribavirin for malignant glioma cell lines (7). Recently, Volpin et al (9) showed that ribavirin (30 µM) inhibited cell proliferation and migration, and increased cell arrest and cell death in glioma cells, potentially through modulation of the elF4E, EZH2, and ERK pathways. Furthermore, they indicated that ribavirin combined with TMZ (100 µM) and irradiation (5 Gy) could potentially enhance the anti-tumor response in glioma cells and glioma stem-like cells, and that animals treated with a combination of ribavirin, irradiation, and TMZ had a significantly increased survival time (9). More recently, we found that ribavirin (10 µM) exerts an anti-tumor effect on malignant glioma cells via the biological processes of induction of DSBs, cell cycle arrest in G0/G1, and both exogenous and endogenous apoptosis (10). Moreover, such effects might not be dependent on MGMT expression, which is closely correlated with resistance to TMZ treatment (10).
In the present study, the combination of ribavirin with TMZ and IFN-β (clinically achievable concentrations) revealed a more profound cell growth inhibitory effect as compared to ribavirin alone with a ribavirin dose-dependency, which was observed from a relatively low concentration of ribavirin, in all seven malignant glioma cell lines (Fig. 1), suggesting that ribavirin has some anti-tumor effect as a medical drug. Although TMZ (10 µM) did not show a cell growth inhibitory effect in A-172, T98G, U-138MG, and YH-13, the combination of ribavirin with TMZ and IFN-β did exhibit a significant cell growth inhibitory effect in these cell lines. Out of the four cells, U-138MG and YH-13 displayed a significant cell growth inhibitory effect when treated with ribavirin, TMZ, and IFN-β as compared to the effect without ribavirin (Fig. 2). These findings suggested that the combination of ribavirin with TMZ and IFN-β revealed a more significant cell growth inhibitory effect in not only TMZ sensitive cells but also in TMZ resistant cells. Furthermore, in this study, the anti-tumor efficacy of a combination of these three agents on A-172 and U-251MG cells indicated a synergistic interaction when assessed by the Chou-Talalay method [A-172 and U-251MG were used in the analysis because the IC50 for each drug had been obtained (7,22)]. Such a combination of ribavirin with TMZ and IFN-β might therefore be considered as an effective treatment in certain glioblastoma cells, although, to the best of our knowledge, no report has yet described the detailed effect of such a combination on glioma cell lines and other cell lines.
Although the mechanism underlying the anti-viral and anti-tumor effects of ribavirin has not yet been fully elucidated, several participating/possible processes have been mentioned above. Kast et al (28) pointed out the following major mechanisms of action, particularly related to the anti-viral action: i) actual intermingling within the viral RNA; ribavirin enters the cell via a nucleoside transport mechanism, subsequently inhibiting/altering viral RNA synthesis, ii) structural analogy to GTP; incorporation into the cell passively, then binding/inhibiting RNA polymerase/RNA synthesis, iii) immune clearance; immune-stimulation by up-regulation of cytokines to shift the Th1/2 cell balance to Th1 dominance, iv) inhibition of eIF4E; thereby inhibiting mRNA capping and translation initiation, v) modulation of IFN-related gene expression, vi) inhibition of IMPDH; with consequent depletion of intracellular GTP, and vii) RNA mutagen; following triphosphorylation, ribavirin triphosphate is incorporated into replicating RNA viral RNA polymerases with consequent induction of viral mutagenesis. These processes are attractive as factors in the repurposing of the anti-viral ribavirin as an anti-tumor agent, and also in the mechanism underlying the synergistic effect of ribavirin in combination with other agents. In particular, the modulation of IFN-related gene expression is thought to be a potential factor in the synergistic effect of ribavirin with IFN (13,19), since IFN exerts a priming effect on the ribavirin-induced IFN-related gene (29). Further studies investigating the molecular mechanisms are clearly needed to reaffirm the efficacy of these combinations.
In the present study, the flow cytometry analysis might indicate that apoptosis induction represented one possible biological process associated with the synergistic anti-tumor effect of triple combination treatment, because the apoptotic cells after such triple treatment tended to be increased in U-251MG, although no statistically significant differences were observed. Schlosser et al (20) demonstrated that ribavirin and IFN enhanced apoptosis and caspase activation in hepatoma cells. Further, Teng et al (21) showed that ribavirin in combination with IFN could significantly inhibit the cell proliferation and migration, induce apoptosis, arrest the cell cycle, and decrease IL-10 production in renal carcinoma cells. On the basis of these findings, we propose that ribavirin in combination with TMZ and IFN-β could increase apoptosis in glioblastoma cells.
Finally, and very importantly, we need briefly to mention other effects of the drug combination used in this study. Chemotherapy-induced toxicity is a major problem in anti-tumor therapy. A cell growth inhibitory effect was also observed at a relatively low concentration of ribavirin (0.1 and 1 µM) in some glioma cell lines, AM-38, T98G, U-87MG, U-138MG, and U2-51MG, combined with 10 µM TMZ and 10 IU/ml IFN-β: both concentrations are clinically achievable (19,24). Ribavirin at 10 µM is considered a clinically relevant concentration, because when administered at a dose of 800 mg/day as a therapeutic agent for chronic hepatitis C, the blood concentration of ribavirin reached 13 µM and the cerebral spinal migration of ribavirin was 70% (10,25). In addition, Casaos et al (11) employed 50 µM ribavirin as a clinically appropriate concentration in their in vitro experiments. A very low concentration of ribavirin should help to reduce the adverse events of ribavirin, such as anemia, and be easier for clinical use. In addition, ribavirin is relatively inexpensive, and therefore beneficial in relation to the rising medical costs particularly of tumor treatment. Since the clinical use of triple combination therapy could lead to combined toxicity in patients, further studies are needed to investigate the extent of efficacy at various doses and times of use of these combinations.
In conclusion, we have provided evidence that ribavirin in combination with TMZ and IFN-β can induce synergistic anti-tumor effects involving of cell growth inhibition in glioma cells, and could be of potential importance in the clinical setting.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mr. Nobuo Miyazaki (Toray Industries Inc., Tokyo, Japan) for his discussions. Some parts of the present study have been included within a Japanese-language thesis submitted for the Ph.D. degree of Yushi Ochiai at Nihon University School of Medicine.
Funding
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant no. 16K10772) and in part by a grant from the Health Sciences Research Institute, Inc. (Yokohama, Japan) for the Division of Companion Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
AY contributed to the experimental concept and design. YO and ES developed the experimental design, performed most of the experiments and some of the data analysis, and wrote part of the draft manuscript. KS and AY also conducted part of the data analysis and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. SYo, SYa and AO were involved in the conception and design of the study, undertook part of the experiments, analyzed the data, and contributed to the writing of the draft manuscript. TU, YS, TN, HH and YK supervised the study (including the experimental design), performed some of the experiments, analyzed data, helped prepare the draft manuscript, and proofread the manuscript. YO and KS contributed equally to this work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, et al: Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 10:459–466. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sidwell RW, Huffman JH, Khare GP, Allem LB, Witkowski JT and Robins RK: Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of Virazole: 1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide. Science. 177:705–706. 1972. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kohli A, Shaffer A, Sherman A and Kottilil S: Treatment of hepatitis C: A systematic review. JAMA. 312:631–640. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kentsis A, Topisirovic I, Culjkovic B, Shao L and Borden KL: Ribavirin suppresses eIF4E-mediated oncogenic transformation by physical mimicry of the 7-methyl guanosine mRNA cap. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:18105–18110. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Assouline S, Culjkovic B, Cocolakis E, Rousseau C, Beslu N, Amri A, Caplan S, Leber B, Roy DC, Miller WH Jr and Borden KL: Molecular targeting of the oncogene eIF4E in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): A proof-of-principle clinical trial with ribavirin. Blood. 114:257–260. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Borden KL and Culjkovic-Kraljacic B: Ribavirin as an anti-cancer therapy: Acute myeloid leukemia and beyond? Leuk Lymphoma. 51:1805–1815. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ogino A, Sano E, Ochiai Y, Yamamuro S, Tashiro S, Yachi K, Ohta T, Fukushima T, Okamoto Y, Tsumoto K, et al: Efficacy of ribavirin against malignant glioma cell lines. Oncol Lett. 8:2469–2474. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De la Cruz-Hernandez E, Medina-Franco JL, Trujillo J, Chavez-Blanco A, Dominguez-Gomez G, Perez-Cardenas E, Gonzalez-Fierro A, Taja-Chayeb L and Dueñas-Gonzalez A: Ribavirin as a tri-targeted antitumor repositioned drug. Oncol Rep. 33:2384–2392. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Volpin F, Casaos J, Sesen J, Mangraviti A, Choi J, Gorelick N, Frieche J, Lott T, Felder R, Scotland SJ, et al: Use of an anti-viral drug, Ribavirin, as an anti-glioblastoma therapeutic. Oncogene. 36:3037–3047. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ochiai Y, Sano E, Okamoto Y, Yoshimura S, Makita K, Yamamuro S, Ohta T, Ogino A, Tadakuma H, Ueda T, et al: Efficacy of ribavirin against malignant glioma cell lines: Follow-up study. Oncol Rep. 39:537–544. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Casaos J, Huq S, Lott T, Felder R, Choi J, Gorelick N, Peters M, Xia Y, Maxwell R, Zhao T, et al: Ribavirin as a potential therapeutic for atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors. Oncotarget. 9:8054–8067. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Saito R, Mizuno M, Hatano M, Kumabe T, Yoshimoto T and Yoshida J: Two different mechanisms of apoptosis resistance observed in interferon-β induced apoptosis of human glioma cells. J Neurooncol. 67:273–280. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshino A, Katayama Y, Yokoyama T, Watanabe T, Ogino A, Ota T, Komine C, Fukushima T and Kusama K: Therapeutic implication of interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) and IRF-2 in diffusely infiltrating astrocytomas (DIA): Response to (IFN)-beta in glioblastoma cells and prognostic value for DIA. J Neurooncol. 74:249–260. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vannucchi S, Chiantore MV, Mangino G, Percario ZA, Affabris E, Fiorucci G and Romeo G: Perspective in biomolecular therapeutic intervention in cancer: From the early to the new strategies with type 1 interferons. Curr Med Chem. 14:667–679. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshino A, Tashiro S, Ogino A, Yachi K, Ohta T, Fukushima T, Watanabe T, Katayama Y, Okamoto Y, Sano E and Tsumoto K: Gene expression profiles predicting the response to IFN-β and a combination of temozolomide and IFN-β in malignant gliomas. Int J Oncol. 39:529–542. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshida J, Kajita Y, Wakabayashi T and Sugita K: Long-term follow-up results of 175 patients with malignant glioma: Importance of radical tumor resection and post-operative adjuvant therapy with interferon, ACNU and radiation. Acta Neurochir. 127:55–59. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Natsume A, Ishii D, Wakabayashi T, Tsuno T, Hatano H, Mizuno M and Yoshida J: IFN-beta down-regulates the expression of DNA repair gene MGMT and sensitizes resistant glioma cells to temozolomide. Cancer Res. 65:7573–7579. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park JA, Joe YA, Kim TG and Hong YK: Potentiation of anti-glioma effect with combined temozolomide and interferon-beta. Oncol Rep. 16:1253–1260. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshino A, Ogino A, Yachi K, Ohta T, Fukushima T, Watanabe T, Katayama Y, Okamoto Y, Naruse N and Sano E: Effect of IFN-beta on human glioma cell lines with temozolomide resistance. Int J Oncol. 35:139–148. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schlosser SF, Schuler M, Berg CP, Lauber K, Schulze-Osthoff K, Schmahl FW and Wesselborg S: Ribavirin and alpha interferon enhance death receptor-mediated apoptosis and caspase activation in human hepatoma cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 47:1912–1921. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Teng L, Ding D, Chen Y, Dai H, Liu G, Qiao Z and An R: Anti-tumor effect of ribavirin in combination with interferon-α on renal cell carcinoma cell lines in vitro. Cancer Cell Int. 14:632014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshino A, Ogino A, Yachi K, Ohta T, Fukushima T, Watanabe T, Katayama Y, Okamoto Y, Naruse N, Sano E and Tsumoto K: Gene expression profiling predicts response to temozolomide in malignant gliomas. Int J Oncol. 36:1367–1377. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wischhusen J, Naumann U, Ohgaki H, Rastinejad F and Weller M: CP-31398, a novel p53-stabilizing agent, induces p53-dependent and p53-independent glioma cell death. Oncogene. 22:8233–8245. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ostermann S, Csajka C, Buclin T, Leyvraz S, Lejeune F, Decosterd LA and Stupp R: Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid population pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in malignant glioma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 10:3728–3736. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Naik GS and Tyagi MG: A pharmacological profile of ribavirin and monitoring of its plasma concentration in chronic hepatitis C infection. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2:42–54. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chou TC: Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol Rev. 58:621–681. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ren H, Tan X, Dong Y, Giese A, Chou TC, Rainov N and Yang B: Differential effect of imatinib and synergism of combination treatment with chemotherapeutic agents in malignant glioma cells. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 104:241–252. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kast RE, Skuli N, Cos S, Karpel-Massler G, Shiozawa Y, Goshen R and Halatsch ME: The ABC7 regimen: A new approach to metastatic breast cancer using seven common drugs to inhibit epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and augment capecitabine efficacy. Breast Cancer. 9:495–514. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Stewart WE, Gosser JB and Lockart RZ Jr: Priming: A nonantiviral function of interferon. J Virol. 7:792–801. 1971. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |