Open Access

MicroRNA‑9‑5p increases the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to 5‑fluorouracil by downregulating high mobility group A2 expression

  • Authors:
    • Huizhe Zheng
    • Bin Yan
    • Qi Wu
    • Jingli Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 26, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12496
  • Article Number: 235
  • Copyright: © Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Chemotherapy drug 5‑fluorouracil (5‑FU) is the first‑line treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC); however, 5‑FU resistance decreases CRC therapeutic efficiency. A previous study revealed that microRNA (miR)‑9‑5p serves an antitumor effect in CRC. However, the effect of miR‑9‑5p in CRC chemoresistance remains unknown. In the present study, two CRC cell lines, including HT‑29 and HCT‑116 cells, were used to investigate the impact of miR‑9‑5p in overcoming 5‑FU resistance. The results revealed that treatment with 5‑FU decreased CRC cell viability and upregulated miR‑9‑5p expression in both CRC cells. Knockdown of miR‑9‑5p decreased HCT‑116 cell sensitivity to 5‑FU and inhibited apoptosis. By contrast, miR‑9‑5p overexpression enhanced the sensitivity of HT‑29 cells to 5‑FU and induced apoptosis. Additionally, it was confirmed that miR‑9‑5p directly targeted high mobility group A2 (HMGA2). HMGA2 overexpression reversed miR‑9‑5p‑induced HT‑29 apoptosis. The present study indicated that miR‑9‑5p enhanced the sensitivity of CRC cells to 5‑FU via downregulating HMGA2 expression.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent malignant tumor, with 1.85 million new cases per year, and the second primary cause of death worldwide, with 881,000 deaths estimated in 2018 (1). 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been widely used as a chemotherapeutic agent for CRC (2). However, the therapeutic effects of 5-FU on patients with CRC are very limited due to the development of drug resistance (3). It is imperative to investigate the potential mechanisms of CRC chemoresistance, which may help to develop novel treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs), a class of short endogenous non-coding RNAs, serve key roles in gene regulation after transcription via targeting the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of mRNAs (4). A previous study has revealed the antitumor effects of miRNAs in numerous types of cancer, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, prostate cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (5). Dysregulation of miRNAs has been reported to exert a crucial function in drug chemoresistance (6). For example, miR-20a overexpression sensitizes breast cancer cells to chemotherapy drugs and inhibits their proliferation (7). Wang et al (8) demonstrated that miR-26b was involved in 5-FU-induced apoptosis in CRC. Recent studies have suggested that miR-9 behaves as a tumor suppressor in different types of cancer, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (9), gastric cancer (10), acute myeloid leukemia (11) and CRC (12). Cekaite et al (13) observed low miR-9-5p expression in CRC cells and found that miR-9-5p overexpression inhibits cell survival and promotes apoptosis. Additionally, miR-9-5p represses CRC cell migration and invasion via downregulating transmembrane-4-L6 family 1 expression (14). However, the impact of miR-9-5p in CRC chemoresistance remains unclear.

The high mobility group A2 (HMGA2) gene is located on human chromosome 12q14 (15). Accumulating evidence has revealed that HMGA2 is highly expressed in a number of malignant tumors, including lung cancer (16), breast cancer (17) and CRC (18). Previous studies have demonstrated that high HMGA2 expression is associated with a poor prognosis and a lower survival rate in patients with CRC (18,19). Furthermore, Xu et al (20) revealed that HMGA2 contributes to 5-FU chemoresistance in CRC via the dishevelled segment polarity protein 2/Wnt signaling pathway. Based on the aforementioned studies, the present study speculated that miR-9-5p may modulate 5-FU resistance in CRC by regulating HMGA2 expression.

In the current study, the function and underlying mechanism of miR-9-5p in 5-FU resistance in two CRC cell lines, including HCT-116 and HT-29 cells, were investigated.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

According to previous studies (21,22), human CRC HCT-116 and HT-29 cell lines were chosen to evaluate the effect of miR-9-5p in CRC chemoresistance. HCT-116 and HT-29 cells were obtained from Procell Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd., and maintained in McCoy's 5A medium (Procell Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). 293T cells (Shanghai Zhongqiao Xinzhou Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) were incubated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) containing 10% FBS. Cells were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Cell transfection

Human miR-9-5p agomir (sense, 5′-UCUUUGGUUAUCUAGCUGUAUGA-3′ and antisense, 5′-AUACAGCUAGAUAACCAAAGAUU-3′) and its scrambled negative control (NC; sense, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′ and antisense, 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′), miR-9-5p antagomir (5′-UCAUACAGCUAGAUAACCAAAGA-3′) and its scrambled NC (5′-CAGUACUUUUGUGUAGUACAA-3′) were bought from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. HCT-116 and HT-29 cells were seeded in a 12-well plate (4×104 cells/well) and incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2. At 70% confluency, HT-29 cells were transfected with 100 pmol miR-9-5p agomir or agomir NC at room temperature for 48 h using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) following the manufacturer's protocol. Similarly, HCT-116 cells were transfected with 100 pmol miR-9-5p antagomir or antagomir NC. An HMGA2-overexpression pcDNA3.1 plasmid (over-HMGA2) was obtained from GenScript, whereas an empty pcDNA3.1 vector (GenScript) was applied as a NC (vector). A small interference (si)RNA sequence of HMGA2 (si-HMGA2; sense, 5′-AGAGGCAGACCUAGGAAAUTT-3′ and antisense, 5′-ATTTCCTAGGTCTGCCTCTTT-3′) was bought from JTS Scientific, Ltd. A scrambled siRNA (JTS Scientific, Ltd.) was used as a NC (siRNA NC; sense, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′ and antisense, 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′). A total of 1 µg of over-HMGA2 was transfected alone or co-transfected with 50 pmol miR-9-5p agomir into HT-29 cells at room temperature for 48 h using Lipofectamine 2000 following the manufacturer's protocol. HCT-116 cells were transfected with 50 pmol si-HMGA2 or co-transfected with 50 pmol miR-9-5p antagomir and si-HMGA2. Transfected cells were collected 48 h after incubation for subsequent experiments.

Hoechst staining

After fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, two CRC cell lines (HCT-116 and HT-29 cells) were used to observe nuclear changes and apoptotic body formation using the Hoechst staining kit (Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were visualized under a fluorescence microscope (IX53; Olympus Corporation; magnification, ×400) and counted by a professional researcher, who was blind to the grouping. The percentage of apoptotic cells was calculated as follows: Apoptotic cells (%)=(the number of apoptotic cells/the number of total cells) ×100%.

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA from HCT-116 and HT-29 cells was isolated using the TRIpure lysis buffer (BioTeke Corporation). Subsequently, RT to cDNA was performed using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase kit (cat. no. PR6502; BioTeke Corporation) according to the manufacturer's protocol. qPCR reactions were performed using the SYBR Green PCR kit (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The PCR reaction was run for an initial denaturation for 5 min at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 15 sec, annealing at 60°C for 25 sec and extension at 72°C for 30 sec. Subsequently, the 2−ΔΔCq comparative method was applied to determine the relative expression levels of mRNA and miRNA (23). U6 was used as the internal reference for miR-9-5p, while β-actin acted as the internal reference for HMGA2. The primer sequences used are listed in Table I.

Table I.

Primers used for reverse transcription-quantitative PCR.

Table I.

Primers used for reverse transcription-quantitative PCR.

GeneSequence (5′-3′)
HMGA2F: CTTCAGCCCAGGGACAAC
R: TCCAGTGGCTTCTGCTTTC
β-actinF: CTTAGTTGCGTTACACCCTTTCTTG
R: CTGTCACCTTCACCGTTCCAGTTT
U6F: GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACT
R: GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTC
hsa-miR-9-5pF: GCAGCCTCTTTGGTTATCTAGC
R: GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTC

[i] HMGA2, high mobility group A2; miR, microRNA; F, forward; R, reverse.

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org) was used to predict the potential target genes of miR-9-5p. For the miR-9-5p-target analysis, a fragment of the HMGA2 3′-UTR containing either the wild-type (WT) or mutated (Mut) binding sites for miR-9-5p was cloned in a pmirGLO luciferase reporter vector (Promega Corporation) following the manufacturer's instructions. 293T cells were plated into 12-well plates and co-transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 with luciferase reporter plasmid and miR-9-5p agomir and agomir NC. After 4 h, cells were incubated in new DMEM for 48 h at 37°C. Subsequently, luciferase activities were detected using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay kit (Promega Corporation) following the manufacturer's protocol. Luciferase activity was normalized to the Renilla luciferase activity.

Western blotting

Cells were lysed using the RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and the supernatants were collected via centrifugation (10,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C). Protein concentration was measured using the BCA Protein Concentration Determination kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) following the manufacturer's protocol. Protein separation (40 µg/lane) was performed via 12 or 15% SDS-PAGE (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and blocked with 5% (m/v) skimmed milk, followed by incubation with the following primary antibodies at 4°C overnight: Polyclonal rabbit anti-HMGA2 (1:1,000; cat. no. 20795-1-AP; ProteinTech Group, Inc.) and monoclonal mouse anti-β-actin (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-47778; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). After washing with TBS-Tween (0.1% Tween-20), proteins were incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5,000; cat. no. A0208; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and goat anti-mouse IgG (1:5,000; cat. no. A0216; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) secondary antibodies for 40 min at 37°C. The protein bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and quantified using the Gel-Pro-Analyzer 4.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc.).

Cell counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

Briefly, 4×103 cells/well were plated in a 96-well plate. Subsequently, CRC cells were subjected to distilled water (vehicle control group) or different concentrations of 5-FU (0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 µM; Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.). After 48 h at 37°C, the CCK-8 assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was used to measure CRC cell viability at 37°C for 1 h following the manufacturer's protocol. Optical density values at 450 nm were detected using an ELX-800 microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc.; Agilent Technologies, Inc.).

Apoptosis assay

The Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection kit (Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd.) was used to measure apoptosis. After washing two times with PBS, CRC cells were double-stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI in the dark for 10 min at room temperature. Transfected cells were subjected to 2.5 or 10 µM 5-FU. After 48 h, apoptosis was measured via flow cytometry (NovoCyte; ACEA Biosciences, Inc.; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) and analyzed using NovoExpress 1.2.5 (ACEA Biosciences, Inc.; Agilent Technologies, Inc.).

Caspase activity assay

Cells were lysed in cold lysis buffer and maintained on ice for 15 min. After centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C, protein concentration in the cell supernatant was detected using the Bradford Protein Concentration Determination kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Subsequently, caspase-3 and activities of the CRC cells were measured using the Caspase 3 Activity Assay kit (cat. no. C1116; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and caspase-9 activities were detected using the Caspase 9 Activity Assay kit (cat. no. BC3890; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), following the manufacturers' protocol.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (v8.0; GraphPad Software, Inc.) and data were presented as the mean ± SD (n=3). IC50 values were measured using GraphPad Prism. The IC50 value represents the drug concentration at which tumor cells are inhibited by half. Unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test was used for comparisons between two groups, while one-way or two-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test was used for multiple comparisons to analyze statistically significant differences. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

5-FU upregulates miR-9-5p expression in CRC cells

The effect of 5-FU on two CRC cell lines, including HT-29 and HCT-116 cells, was assessed via CCK-8 assay. The cell viability of both CRC cell lines was significantly decreased in a concentration-dependent (0.65–80 µM) manner compared with the vehicle group (0 µM 5-FU) (Fig. 1A; P<0.05). HCT-116 cells were more sensitive to 5-FU than HT-29 cells (IC50 6.343±0.767 and 30.510±3.440 µM, respectively). A previous study demonstrated that miR-9-5p expression was markedly lower in CRC cells compared with that in normal colorectal epithelial cells (13); thus, the present study further assessed miR-9-5p expression in 5-FU-treated CRC cells. The RT-qPCR results revealed that treatment with 5-FU significantly upregulated miR-9-5p expression in both CRC cells in a dose-dependent manner compared with the vehicle group (Fig. 1B; P<0.05).

miR-9-5p overexpression enhances CRC cell sensitivity to 5-FU

To explore the effect of miR-9-5p in overcoming 5-FU resistance, HT-29 cells with a high IC50 value were transfected with miR-9-5p agomir or agomir NC, and HCT-116 cells with a low IC50 value were transfected with miR-9-5p antagomir or antagomir NC. The results revealed that miR-9-5p overexpression significantly increased miR-9-5p expression in HT-29 cells, while miR-9-5p expression was significantly downregulated in HCT-116 transfected with antagomiR-9-5p (Fig. 2A; P<0.05). The CCK-8 analysis indicated that after transfection with miR-9-5p agomirs and antagomirs, treatment with 5-FU significantly decreased CRC cell viability in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2B; P<0.05). Upregulation of miR-9-5p significantly enhanced HT-29 cell sensitivity to 5-FU, with the IC50 value decreasing from 28.488±4.069 µM in the agomir NC group to 15.680±2.001 µM in the miR-9-5p agomir group, whereas miR-9-5p-knockdown decreased HCT-116 cell sensitivity to 5-FU, with the IC50 value increasing from 6.464±0.686 to 17.586±2.501 µM in the antagomir NC and miR-9-5p antagomir groups, respectively (Fig. 2B; P<0.05). Additionally, based on the IC50 value of the two CRC cell lines (HT-29 and HCT-116), one-third of the IC50 value (2.5 µM 5-FU for HCT-116 cells and 10 µM 5-FU for HT-29 cells) was chosen to explore the impact of miR-9-5p on the sensitivity of CRC cells to 5-FU. The results revealed that miR-9-5p overexpression significantly induced HT-29 apoptosis, whereas knockdown of miR-9-5p significantly repressed the apoptosis of HCT-116 cells (Fig. 2C; P<0.05). Hoechst staining revealed that the nuclei of apoptotic cells were densely stained after transfection with the miR-9-5p agomir compared with the agomir NC, while treatment with miR-9-5p antagomir decreased the staining number of apoptotic cells compared with the antagomir NC (Fig. 2D). Corresponding quantitative analysis revealed that the percentage of apoptotic cells was significantly increased by miR-9-5p agomir and significantly decreased by miR-9-5p antagomir compared with the corresponding NCs (Fig. 2D; P<0.05). Furthermore, the expression levels of apoptosis-associated markers, including caspase-3 and caspase-9, were significantly upregulated after miR-9-5p overexpression and downregulated after miR-9-5p-knockdown (Fig. 2E; P<0.05).

miR-9-5p directly targets HMGA2

To clarify the functional effect of miR-9-5p in CRC cell sensitivity to 5-FU, bioinformatics analysis was applied to predict its target genes. The results revealed that HMGA2 was one of target genes of miR-9-5p. Therefore, HMGA2 expression was determined by RT-qPCR and western blot assays. The results indicated that compared with the vehicle group (0 µM 5-FU), treatment with 5-FU decreased HMGA2 expression in the two CRC cell lines (Fig. 3A and B). Additionally, miR-9-5p overexpression significantly downregulated HMGA2 expression in HT-29 cells, whereas miR-9-5p silencing significantly upregulated HMGA2 expression in HCT-116 cells compared with their respective controls (Fig. 3A and B; P<0.05). TargetScan predicted that miR-9-5p potentially bound to HMGA2 mRNA. There was a targeted binding association between miR-9-5p and HMGA2 (Fig. 3C). Results of the luciferase reporter assay verified that miR-9-5p overexpression significantly repressed the luciferase activity of the reporter via binding to the WT but not the MUT 3′-UTR of HMGA2 (Fig. 3C; P<0.05).

Overexpression of HMGA2 reverses miR-9-5p-induced HT-29 apoptosis

To confirm whether HMGA2 was involved in miR-9-5p-mediated CRC drug resistance response, HMGA2-overexpression plasmid was co-transfected with miR-9-5p agomir into HT-29 cells. Additionally, a HMGA2 siRNA was co-transfected with miR-9-5p antagomir into HCT-116 cells. Fig. 4A shows that HMGA2 expression was significantly upregulated in HT-29 cells after transfection with over-HMGA2 and significantly downregulated in si-HMGA2-transfected HCT-116 cells (P<0.05). After co-transfection with miR-9-5p agomir + vector/over-HMGA2 into HT-29 cells, and miR-9-5p antagomir + siRNA NC/si-HMGA2 into HCT-116 cells, CCK-8 assays revealed that overexpression of HMGA2 significantly increased the viability of miR-9-5p agomir-transfected HT-29 cells, whereas the viability of miR-9-5p antagomir-transfected HCT-116 cells was significantly inhibited by HMGA2-knockdown (Fig. 4B; P<0.05). Results of flow cytometry analysis exhibited that the apoptotic rates in miR-9-5p agomir-transfected HT-29 cells were significantly decreased after HMGA2 overexpression, while increased apoptosis was observed in miR-9-5p antagomir-transfected HCT-116 cells following downregulation of HMGA2 expression (Fig. 4C; P<0.05). A similar trend was observed in the caspase activity assays. As shown in Fig. 4D, HMGA2 overexpression significantly decreased the levels of caspase-3 and caspase-9 in miR-9-5p agomir-transfected HT-29 cells, while HMGA2-knockdown significantly increased the levels of caspase-3 and caspase-9 in miR-9-5p antagomir-transfected HCT-116 cells (P<0.05). The current findings indicated that HMGA2 overexpression reversed miR-9-5p-induced apoptosis of HT-29 cells.

Discussion

Various types of treatment plans have been developed for a more effective treatment of CRC; 5-FU is one of the most important anticancer drugs for the therapy of CRC (2). However, resistance to anticancer drugs frequently drives tumor progression (2,3). Accumulating studies have demonstrated that miRNAs serve vital roles in drug resistance for cancer chemotherapy based on their functions and targets (24,25). A previous study revealed that upregulation of miR-9-5p increased the sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells to cisplatin via modulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2 signaling (9). However, whether miR-9-5p is involved in 5-FU resistance of CRC is unknown. A previous study suggested that miR-9-5p expression was lower in CRC cells, including HCT-116 and HT-29 cells, compared with that in normal colorectal epithelial cells (13). In the current study, the functional effect of miR-9-5p in CRC chemoresistance was further investigated and the targeted signaling that mediated CRC escaping from drug toxicity was explored. The present study revealed that the cell viability of HT-29 cells (p53 wild-type) and HCT-116 cells (TP53 allele homozygous mutant) (26) was decreased in a concentration-dependent manner after 5-FU treatment. HCT-116 cells seemed more sensitive to 5-FU than HT-29 cells. van Boxtel et al (27) have reported that homozygous mutant rats lacking TP53 exhibit decreased survival due to spontaneous tumor development compared with heterozygous rats, which can explain the aforementioned finding. Additionally, RT-qPCR was performed to examine miR-9-5p expression, and the results suggested that 5-FU significantly upregulated miR-9-5p expression in CRC cells. Notably, overexpression of miR-9-5p suppressed cell viability and induced apoptosis in 5-FU-treated HT-29 cells, whereas these responses were mitigated by miR-9-5p-knockdown. Application of miR-9-5p agomir alleviated 5-FU chemoresistance in HT-29 cells. The present study confirmed the crucial role of miR-9-5p in 5-FU chemoresistance.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that miR-9 acts as a tumor suppressor by binding to various targets in CRC, such as C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (12), ubiquitin-like with plant homeodomain and ring finger domains 1 (28) and P21-activated kinase 4 (29). However, the association between miR-9-5p and its target gene in CRC cells to 5-FU resistance has not been defined. The chromatin structuring protein HMGA2 has been found to affect the chemosensitivity of CRC to irinotecan and the stability of human subtelomere (30). A previous study revealed that HMGA2 promotes gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer cells in vitro by increasing histone acetylation (31). Additionally, high HMGA2 expression protects CRC cells from DNA breaks caused by the drug irinotecan, which is a clinically important inhibitor of DNA topoisomerases I (TOP-I) (30). During the shift of replication forks, the transient accumulation of DNA supercoil disrupts gene stability and is manipulated by DNA TOP (30). The protective role of HMGA2 may be due to inhibition of the formation of TOP-I/DNA complexes (32). On the other hand, low HMGA2 expression contributes to the formation of TOP-I/DNA complexes induced by irinotecan (30). Tsavaris et al (33) have confirmed that TOP-I is highly expressed in CRC following 5-FU treatment. In the current study, miR-9-5p overexpression significantly decreased HMGA2 expression by directly targeting the 3′-UTR of HMGA2. Overexpression of HMGA2 restored miR-9-5p-repressed 5-FU chemoresistance in vitro. The present findings indicated an association between miR-9-5p and 5-FU resistance in CRC. Further exploration is required on whether TOP-I may be a miR-9-5p-inhibited 5-FU sensitivity determinant.

In summary, the present study confirmed that the inhibition of miR-9-5p in 5-FU resistance was mediated by downregulating HMGA2 expression. miR-9-5p enhanced the CRC cell sensitivity to 5-FU and induced apoptosis. The current data provides evidence supporting the association of miR-9-5p with 5-FU resistance in CRC.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by a grant from the Fundamental Research Business Expense of Universities in Heilongjiang Province (grant no. 2018-KYYWFMY-0056).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

HZ and BY designed the study. HZ and QW performed the research and analysed the data. HZ wrote the first draft of the manuscript. JZ performed the supplementary experiments and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Pisano A, Griñan-Lison C, Farace C, Fiorito G, Fenu G, Jiménez G, Scognamillo F, Peña-Martin J, Naccarati A, Pröll J, et al: The inhibitory role of miR-486-5p on CSC phenotype has diagnostic and prognostic potential in colorectal cancer. Cancers (Basel). 12:34322020. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Giuliani J and Bonetti A: The pharmacological costs of first-line therapies in unselected patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A review of published phase III trials. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 15:277–284. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Yao J, Huang A, Zheng X, Liu T, Lin Z, Zhang S, Yang Q, Zhang T and Ma H: 53BP1 loss induces chemoresistance of colorectal cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil by inhibiting the ATM-CHK2-P53 pathway. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 143:419–431. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Wu C, Bardes EE, Jegga AG and Aronow BJ: ToppMiR: Ranking microRNAs and their mRNA targets based on biological functions and context. Nucleic Acids Res. 42((Web Server Issue)): W107–W113. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Berindan-Neagoe I, Monroig Pdel C, Pasculli B and Calin GA: MicroRNAome genome: A treasure for cancer diagnosis and therapy. CA Cancer J Clin. 64:311–336. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Zhao L, Shan Y, Liu B, Li Y and Jia L: Retraction Note: Functional screen analysis reveals miR-3142 as central regulator in chemoresistance and proliferation through activation of the PTEN-AKT pathway in CML. Cell Death Dis. 11:1212020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Si W, Shen J, Du C, Chen D, Gu X, Li C, Yao M, Pan J, Cheng J, Jiang D, et al: A miR-20a/MAPK1/c-Myc regulatory feedback loop regulates breast carcinogenesis and chemoresistance. Cell Death Differ. 25:406–420. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Wang B, Lu FY, Shi RH, Feng YD, Zhao XD, Lu ZP, Xiao L, Zhou GQ, Qiu JM and Cheng CE: miR-26b regulates 5-FU-resistance in human colorectal cancer via down-regulation of Pgp. Am J Cancer Res. 8:2518–2527. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Bao Y, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Guo H, Dong Z, Chen Q, Zhang X, Shen W, Chen W and Wang X: Overexpression of microRNA-9 enhances cisplatin sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating EIF5A2-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Int J Biol Sci. 16:827–837. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Meng Q, Xiang L, Fu J, Chu X, Wang C and Yan B: Transcriptome profiling reveals miR-9-3p as a novel tumor suppressor in gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 8:37321–37331. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Zhu B, Xi X, Liu Q, Cheng Y and Yang H: miR-9 functions as a tumor suppressor in acute myeloid leukemia by targeting CX chemokine receptor 4. Am J Transl Res. 11:3384–3397. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Xiong WC, Han N, Ping GF, Zheng PF, Feng HL, Qin L and He P: microRNA-9 functions as a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer by targeting CXCR4. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 11:526–536. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Cekaite L, Rantala JK, Bruun J, Guriby M, Agesen TH, Danielsen SA, Lind GE, Nesbakken A, Kallioniemi O, Lothe RA and Skotheim RI: miR-9, −31, and −182 deregulation promote proliferation and tumor cell survival in colon cancer. Neoplasia. 14:868–879. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Park YR, Lee ST, Kim SL, Liu YC, Lee MR, Shin JH, Seo SY, Kim SH, Kim IH, Lee SO and Kim SW: MicroRNA-9 suppresses cell migration and invasion through downregulation of TM4SF1 in colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 48:2135–2143. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Borrmann L, Schwanbeck R, Heyduk T, Seebeck B, Rogalla P, Bullerdiek J and Wiśniewski JR: High mobility group A2 protein and its derivatives bind a specific region of the promoter of DNA repair gene ERCC1 and modulate its activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:6841–6851. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Gao X, Dai M, Li Q, Wang Z, Lu Y and Song Z: HMGA2 regulates lung cancer proliferation and metastasis. Thorac Cancer. 8:501–510. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Mansoori B, Mohammadi A, Asadzadeh Z, Shirjang S, Minouei M, Abedi Gaballu F, Shajari N, Kazemi T, Gjerstorff MF, Duijf PHG and Baradaran B: HMGA2 and Bach-1 cooperate to promote breast cancer cell malignancy. J Cell Physiol. 234:17714–17726. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Wang X, Liu X, Li AY, Chen L, Lai L, Lin HH, Hu S, Yao L, Peng J, Loera S, et al: Overexpression of HMGA2 promotes metastasis and impacts survival of colorectal cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 17:2570–2580. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Li Y, Zhao Z, Xu C, Zhou Z, Zhu Z and You T: HMGA2 induces transcription factor Slug expression to promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and contributes to colon cancer progression. Cancer Lett. 355:130–140. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Xu X, Wang Y, Deng H, Liu C, Wu J and Lai M: HMGA2 enhances 5-fluorouracil chemoresistance in colorectal cancer via the Dvl2/Wnt pathway. Oncotarget. 9:9963–9974. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Wang YN, Zeng ZL, Lu J, Wang Y, Liu ZX, He MM, Zhao Q, Wang ZX, Li T, Lu YX, et al: CPT1A-mediated fatty acid oxidation promotes colorectal cancer cell metastasis by inhibiting anoikis. Oncogene. 37:6025–6040. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Lesuffleur T, Violette S, Vasile-Pandrea I, Dussaulx E, Barbat A, Muleris M and Zweibaum A: Resistance to high concentrations of methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil of differentiated HT-29 colon-cancer cells is restricted to cells of enterocytic phenotype. Int J Cancer. 76:383–392. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Longley DB and Johnston PG: Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. J Pathol. 205:275–292. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Xia H, Ooi LL and Hui KM: MicroRNA-216a/217-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition targets PTEN and SMAD7 to promote drug resistance and recurrence of liver cancer. Hepatology. 58:629–641. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Ahmed D, Eide PW, Eilertsen IA, Danielsen SA, Eknæs M, Hektoen M, Lind GE and Lothe RA: Epigenetic and genetic features of 24 colon cancer cell lines. Oncogenesis. 2:e712013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

van Boxtel R, Kuiper RV, Toonen PW, van Heesch S, Hermsen R, de Bruin A and Cuppen E: Homozygous and heterozygous p53 knockout rats develop metastasizing sarcomas with high frequency. Am J Pathol. 179:1616–1622. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Zhu M, Xu Y, Ge M, Gui Z and Yan F: Regulation of UHRF1 by microRNA-9 modulates colorectal cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis. Cancer Sci. 106:833–839. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Wang M, Gao Q, Chen Y, Li Z, Yue L and Cao Y: PAK4, a target of miR-9-5p, promotes cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis in colorectal cancer. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 24:582019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Ahmed SM, Ramani PD, Wong SQR, Zhao X, Ivanyi-Nagy R, Leong TC, Chua C, Li Z, Hentze H, Tan IB, et al: The chromatin structuring protein HMGA2 influences human subtelomere stability and cancer chemosensitivity. PLoS One. 14:e02156962019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Dangi-Garimella S, Sahai V, Ebine K, Kumar K and Munshi HG: Three-dimensional collagen I promotes gemcitabine resistance in vitro in pancreatic cancer cells through HMGA2-dependent histone acetyltransferase expression. PLoS One. 8:e645662013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Zhao X, Peter S, Dröge P and Yan J: Oncofetal HMGA2 effectively curbs unconstrained (+) and (−) DNA supercoiling. Sci Rep. 7:84402017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Tsavaris N, Lazaris A, Kosmas C, Gouveris P, Kavantzas N, Kopterides P, Papathomas T, Agrogiannis G, Zorzos H, Kyriakou V and Patsouris E: Topoisomerase I and IIalpha protein expression in primary colorectal cancer and recurrences following 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 64:391–398. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2021
Volume 21 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zheng H, Yan B, Wu Q and Zhang J: MicroRNA‑9‑5p increases the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to 5‑fluorouracil by downregulating high mobility group A2 expression. Oncol Lett 21: 235, 2021.
APA
Zheng, H., Yan, B., Wu, Q., & Zhang, J. (2021). MicroRNA‑9‑5p increases the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to 5‑fluorouracil by downregulating high mobility group A2 expression. Oncology Letters, 21, 235. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12496
MLA
Zheng, H., Yan, B., Wu, Q., Zhang, J."MicroRNA‑9‑5p increases the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to 5‑fluorouracil by downregulating high mobility group A2 expression". Oncology Letters 21.3 (2021): 235.
Chicago
Zheng, H., Yan, B., Wu, Q., Zhang, J."MicroRNA‑9‑5p increases the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to 5‑fluorouracil by downregulating high mobility group A2 expression". Oncology Letters 21, no. 3 (2021): 235. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12496