Open Access

Squalene epoxidase expression is associated with breast tumor progression and with a poor prognosis in breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Nah Ihm Kim
    • Min Ho Park
    • Sun-Seog Kweon
    • Namki Cho
    • Ji Shin Lee
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 4, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12520
  • Article Number: 259
  • Copyright: © Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) have been previously identified using massive parallel RNA sequencing in matched normal, breast cancer (BC) and nodal metastatic tissues. Squalene epoxidase (SQLE), one of these DEGs, is a key enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential involvement of SQLE in the tumorigenic process of BC and to determine its association with the clinical outcome of BC. SQLE mRNA expression was measured using reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR in 10 pairs of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and BC tissues and their adjacent normal tissues. Immunohistochemical staining of SQLE on tissue microarray was performed in 26 normal breast, 79 DCIS and 198 BC samples. The role of SQLE as a prognostic biomarker in patients with BC has been verified using BreastMark. SQLE mRNA expression was significantly increased in DCIS and BC tissues compared with that in their adjacent normal tissues. High SQLE expression was detected in 0, 48.1 and 40.4% of normal breast, DCIS and BC tissues, respectively. SQLE expression in DCIS and BC tissues was significantly higher than that in normal breast tissues. High SQLE expression was observed in DCIS with higher nuclear grade, comedo‑type necrosis and HER2 positivity. High SQLE expression in BC was associated with larger tumor size, nodal metastases, higher stage, HER2 subtype and distant metastatic relapse. High SQLE expression was associated with poor disease‑free and overall survival, and independently predicted poor disease‑free survival in patients with BC. Following BreastMark analysis, high SQLE mRNA expression in BC was significantly associated with a poor prognosis in the ‘all’, lymph node negative, lymph node positive, luminal A subtype and luminal B subtype groups. Therefore, SQLE expression may be upregulated during the tumorigenic process of BC, and high SQLE expression may be a useful biomarker for predicting a poor prognosis in patients with BC.

Introduction

In Korean women, breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common type of cancer (1). Despite the significant improvements in the overall survival and quality of life for women with BC, BC remains a leading cause of cancer-associated deaths (2). Therefore, it is necessary to develop new prognostic and therapeutic markers for patients with BC.

Cancer cells frequently exhibit altered cellular metabolism, which can mediate tumor progression and can be used for therapeutic purposes (3). Cholesterol is a unique lipid that is crucial for membrane formation, cell proliferation and cell differentiation (4). The critical role of cholesterol in the pathogenesis of various types of cancer, such as prostate and breast cancer, has been recognized in tumor cell proliferation, survival and treatment resistance (46). Moreover, several studies have revealed that inhibition of cholesterol synthesis at different steps results in human cancer cell death in both in vitro and in vivo models (3,4,7). Overall, dysregulation of cholesterol metabolism may be a promising new therapeutic target for cancer treatment.

Squalene epoxidase (SQLE) is one of the rate-limiting enzymes in cholesterol synthesis by catalyzing the first step of squalene oxygenation (8). Previous studies have revealed that dysregulation of SQLE expression is involved in the molecular pathogenesis of various types of cancer, such as prostate cancer (9,10), hepatocellular carcinoma (11), pancreatic cancer (12), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (13) and squamous lung cancer (14). SQLE has been proposed as a new molecular marker to predict a poor prognosis in the aforementioned types of cancer (914).

Several studies have already been conducted with the aim of exploring the potential effect of the dysregulation of SQLE expression in BC (1526). SQLE is involved in the maintenance of lipid droplet homeostasis in BC (15). Additionally, SQLE is involved in the process by which normal mammary fibroblasts induce a reversion of the malignant phenotype in primary BC (16). SQLE overexpression is more prevalent in groups with an unfavorable prognosis of stage I/II estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC (17), early-onset BC (18) and African-American patients with luminal A BC (19). Increased SQLE expression in patients with ER+ BC has been associated with poor response to endocrine therapy (20). Furthermore, high SQLE expression has been associated with increased risk of BC recurrence (2123). SQLE copy number amplification has been associated with its overexpression and poor prognosis (24). MYC gene amplification and aberrant SQLE methylation have also been observed in aggressive BC (25). Brown et al (26) have confirmed that SQLE is a true oncogene by clinically relevant amplification in BC. Brown et al (26) have demonstrated that SQLE overexpression represents an independent adverse prognostic factor and that SQLE inhibition may be a novel therapeutic target for BC. Most of the aforementioned SQLE studies in BC have been based on a molecular approach. Although ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive cancerous lesion of the breast (27), to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on the profile of SQLE expression during BC progression, including DCIS.

We have previously performed massive parallel RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis in 21 samples (normal, cancer and nodal metastases) from 7 patients with ER+, HER2 BC, revealing SQLE as one of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (28). Therefore, the present study evaluated the potential involvement of SQLE in the tumorigenic process of BC. Additionally, whether SQLE detection by immunohistochemistry may predict the prognosis in patients with BC was investigated. SQLE expression was examined in 10 pairs of DCIS and BC tissues and their adjacent normal tissues at the mRNA level by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). In addition, immunohistochemical staining of SQLE expression on tissue microarray (TMA) was performed in 26 normal breast, 79 DCIS and 198 BC samples. The role of SQLE as a prognostic biomarker in patients with BC was then verified using BreastMark (29).

Materials and methods

Validation of SQLE RNA-Seq data by RT-qPCR

We have previously generated comprehensive gene expression profiles of matched normal, cancer and lymph node metastatic tissues from 7 patients with ER+, HER2 BC using RNA-Seq analysis (28). To validate the RNA-Seq data, SQLE mRNA expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR, as previously described (30). The isolated RNA used for RNA-Seq in our previous study (28) was used for RT-qPCR. The qPCR reaction was performed in a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System using TaqMan® Gene Expression Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) using the following thermocycling conditions: Initial denaturation for 30 sec at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 60 sec. The following probes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) were used: Hs01123768_m1 (SQLE) and Hs02758991_g1 (GAPDH). The 2−ΔΔCq method (31) was used for data analysis and the value of 2−ΔΔCq indicated the fold change in SQLE expression normalized to GAPDH expression.

Samples for SQLE mRNA expression in DCIS and BC tissues and their adjacent normal tissues

New frozen samples of DCIS and BC tissues and their adjacent normal tissues (≥2 cm from DCIS/BC tissues) were provided by the Biobank of Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (Jeollanam, Republic of Korea), which is a member of the Korea Biobank Network, and were used for RT-qPCR, as aforementioned. The present study included 10 female patients each with DCIS or BC. The mean age in patients with DCIS was 57.2 years (median age, 57.6 years; age range, 48–73 years), while the mean age in patients with BC was 56.6 years (median age, 53.0 years; age range, 39–86 years).

SQLE expression in normal, DCIS and BC tissues
Patients and tissues

Tissues were fixed in 10% formalin for 12–24 h at room temperature, cut into <3-mm-thick sections and embedded in paraffin. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of normal breast tissues with no pathological lesions (n=26), DCIS (n=79) and BC (n=198) were selected from female patients within Chonnam National University Hospital (Gwangju, Republic of Korea) and Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (Jeollanam, Republic of Korea). The mean age in patients with no pathological lesions was 44.3 years (median age, 45.5 years; age range, 25–69 years), the mean age in patients with DCIS was 49.3 years (median age, 48.0 years; age range, 27–73 years) and the mean age in patients with BC was 46.6 years (median age, 45.0 years; age range, 26–89 years). Patients diagnosed with BC between January 1997 and December 2002 were included in the present study and had a follow-up of ≥10 years. After surgery, the patients underwent standard radiation therapy or adjuvant systemic therapy (hormone therapy or chemotherapy), according to the medical insurance program controlled by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea. Medical records were reviewed to obtain clinicopathological information including patient outcome. ER, progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 expression was assessed according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines (3234). DCIS samples between February 2005 and December 2011 were selected based on the availability of FFPE samples.

TMA construction

TMA blocks were constructed using one representative FFPE block in each case. Three cores of 1-mm diameter for BC and two cores of 2-mm diameter for normal breast and DCIS were punched from the donor block.

Immunohistochemistry and evaluation of immunostaining

SQLE expression was examined by immunohistochemical staining using the Bond-max automatic device (Leica Microsystems, Inc.), as previously described (35). Mouse polyclonal antibody against SQLE (1:200; cat. no. 042278; United States Biological) was used. According to a previous study (36), SQLE immunoreactivity was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate) or 3 (strong), based on the intensity of cytoplasmic staining. SQLE expression was evaluated by light microscopy (magnification, ×200). Samples with intensity staining scores of 0–2 were considered as low SQLE expression, while scores of 3 were defined as high SQLE expression.

Validation of SQLE as a prognostic biomarker using BreastMark

SQLE was further analyzed to validate its prognostic value in patients with BC using the BreastMark database, as previously described (29).

Statistical analysis

The data of SQLE expression in matched normal, cancer and lymph node metastatic tissues from seven patients were analyzed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by post-hoc analysis with Fisher's Least Significant Difference adjustment for multiple comparisons. SQLE mRNA expression according to RT-qPCR in the DCIS and BC tissues and their adjacent normal tissues were compared using a paired Student's t-test (two-sided). Categorical nominal variables were tested using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Linear-by-linear association was added to test for the trend. Univariate survival analysis was performed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and the differences in survival curves were assessed with the log-rank test. Cox's proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. SPSS (v25 for windows; IBM Corp.) was used for all statistical analyses. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Validation of SQLE RNA-Seq data by RT-qPCR

SQLE expression was assessed by RNA-Seq (Fig. 1A) and RT-qPCR (Fig. 1B) in matched normal, cancer and nodal metastatic tissues in seven patients with BC. In the RNA-Seq results, SQLE expression (mean ± SD) was upregulated in BC tissues compared with in adjacent normal breast tissues (22.8±10.4 vs. 5.3±3.9 for BC vs. normal, respectively; fold change, 3.915; P=0.007) and subsequently unchanged when comparing nodal metastatic tissues with corresponding BC tissues (17.4±13.5 vs. 22.8±10.4 for nodal vs. BC; fold change, −1.3014; P=0.354) (data not shown). For RT-qPCR, the unamplified total RNA (from the same batch used for RNA-Seq) was used as the template. Although no significant differences among groups were observed, SQLE expression was mainly upregulated in BC and nodal metastatic tissues compared with in adjacent normal breast tissues (data not shown). Overall, the results obtained with the two different techniques were consistent for ~70% (5/7) of the samples tested.

SQLE mRNA in DCIS and BC tissues and their adjacent normal breast tissues

SQLE expression was assessed by RT-qPCR in 10 frozen DCIS tissues (Fig. 2A) and 10 BC tissues (Fig. 2B) and their respective adjacent normal breast tissues. The expression levels of SQLE mRNA (mean ± SD) were significantly increased in DCIS and BC tissues compared with in their adjacent normal breast tissues (6.27±7.54 vs. 1.00±0.00 for DCIS vs. normal, P<0.05; 14.02±22.95 vs. 1.00±0.00 for BC vs. normal, P<0.05) (data not shown). No significant differences in SQLE mRNA expression (mean ± SD) were observed between DCIS and BC (6.27±7.54 vs. 14.02±22.95, respectively; P=0.323) (data not shown).

SQLE expression in normal, DCIS and BC tissues

Normal breast tissues exhibited weak cytoplasmic SQLE expression (Fig. 3A and B). In DCIS and BC tissues, the carcinoma cells displayed variable SQLE expression (Fig. 3C-F). Table I summarizes SQLE expression in normal breast, DCIS and BC tissues. High SQLE expression was detected in 0/26 (0%) of normal breast tissues, 38/79 (48.1%) of DCIS samples, and 80/198 (40.4%) of BC samples. Differential SQLE expression was noted in the DCIS and BC groups compared with in the normal breast group (P<0.05, linear-by-linear association for trend). SQLE expression in DCIS and BC tissues was significantly higher compared with in normal breast tissues (DCIS vs. normal, 48.1 vs. 0%, P<0.001; BC vs. normal, 40.4 vs. 0%, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the expression levels of SQLE between DCIS and BC (DCIS vs. BC, 48.1 vs. 40.4%, P=0.242).

Table I.

SQLE expression in normal breast, ductal carcinoma in situ and breast cancer tissues.

Table I.

SQLE expression in normal breast, ductal carcinoma in situ and breast cancer tissues.

Type of tissueHigh SQLE expression, n/total n (%)P-value
Normal0/26 (0.0)0.018a
Ductal carcinoma in situ38/79 (48.1)
Breast cancer80/198 (40.4)

a Linear-by-linear association. Normal vs. ductal carcinoma in situ, P<0.001; normal vs. breast cancer, P<0.001; ductal carcinoma in situ vs. breast cancer, P=0.242. SQLE, squalene epoxidase.

Tables II and III summarize the associations between SQLE expression and the clinicopathological features of patients with DCIS and BC, respectively. High SQLE expression in DCIS tissues was associated with nuclear grade (P<0.01), comedo-type necrosis (P<0.05) and HER2 status (P<0.01) (Table II). Although not statistically significant, the percentage of high SQLE expression was higher in patients with recurrence (5/7; 71.4%) than in patients without recurrence (33/72; 45.8%) (Table II). High SQLE expression in BC tissues was associated with tumor size (P<0.05), nodal metastases (P<0.001), stage (P<0.01), molecular subtype (P<0.05) and distant metastatic relapse (P<0.05) (Table III).

Table II.

Association between SQLE expression and clinicopathological parameters of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (n=79).

Table II.

Association between SQLE expression and clinicopathological parameters of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (n=79).

CharacteristicsHigh SQLE expression, n/total n (%) P-valuea
Age, years >0.05
  ≤5021/45 (46.7)
  >5017/34 (50.0)
Size, cm >0.05
  ≤2.521/45 (46.7)
  >2.517/34 (50.0)
Nuclear grade <0.01
  11/7 (14.3)
  219/46 (41.3)
  318/26 (69.2)
Comedo-type necrosis <0.05
  No11/32 (34.4)
  Yes27/47 (57.4)
Estrogen receptor-α >0.05
  Negative17/28 (60.7)
  Positive21/51 (41.2)
HER2 <0.01
  Negative18/51 (35.3)
  Positive20/28 (71.4)
Recurrence >0.05b
  No33/72 (45.8)
  Yes5/7 (71.4)

a Analyzed by χ2 test

b Analyzed by Fishers exact test. SQLE, squalene epoxidase.

Table III.

Association between SQLE expression and clinicopathological parameters of patients with breast cancer (n=198).

Table III.

Association between SQLE expression and clinicopathological parameters of patients with breast cancer (n=198).

CharacteristicsHigh SQLE expression, n/total n (%) P-valuea
Age, years >0.05
  ≤4640/112 (35.7)
  >4641/86 (47.7)
Histopathologic type >0.05
  Invasive ductal carcinoma, NOS67/171 (39.2)
  Invasive lobular carcinoma14/25 (56.0)
  Mucinous carcinoma0/2 (0.0)
Tumor size, cm <0.05
  ≤211/35 (31.4)
  2–551/133(38.3)
  >519/30 (63.3)
Number of nodal metastasis <0.001
  029/105 (27.6)
  1–325/51 (49.0)
  4–913/25 (52.0)
  ≥1014/17 (82.4)
Histological grade >0.05
  14/26 (15.4)
  247/101 (46.5)
  330/71 (42.3)
Stage <0.01
  I11/35 (31.4)
  II37/112 (33.0)
  III33/51 (64.7)
Estrogen receptor-α >0.05
  Negative40/87 (46.0)
  Positive41/111 (36.9)
Progesterone receptor >0.05
  Negative39/87 (44.8)
  Positive42/111 (37.8)
HER2 >0.05
  Negative64/162 (39.5)
  Positive17/36 (47.2)
Molecular subtypes <0.05
  Luminal50/135 (37.0)
  HER214/21 (66.7)
  Triple negative17/42 (40.5)
Distant metastatic relapse <0.05
  No52/146 (35.6)
  Yes29/52 (55.8)

a Analyzed by χ2 test. NOS, not otherwise specified; SQLE, squalene epoxidase.

Summary of survival analysis in patients with BC

Table IV summarizes the results of univariate survival analysis according to log-rank test for Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Patients with high SQLE expression exhibited a poor prognosis for disease-free survival and overall survival compared with those with low expression (P=0.001 and P=0.001, respectively; Fig. 4). Lymph node status and SQLE expression were independent poor prognostic factors for disease-free survival, while lymph node status was the only independent poor prognostic factor for overall survival (Table V).

Table IV.

Univariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer.

Table IV.

Univariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer.

CharacteristicsDisease-free survival (P-value)Overall survival (P-value)
Age (≤46 vs. >46 years)0.9720.522
Histological type (invasive carcinoma of no special type vs. other types)0.0760.409
Tumor size (pT1 vs. pT2 vs. pT3)<0.001<0.001
Lymph node status (pN0 vs. pN1 vs. pN2 vs. pN3)<0.001<0.001
Histological grade (1 vs. 2 vs. 3)0.5130.105
Stage (I vs. II vs. III vs. IV)<0.001<0.001
Hormonal therapy (no vs. yes)0.3950.295
Chemotherapy/radiotherapy (no vs. yes)0.0260.017
Estrogen receptor-α status (negative vs. positive)0.4300.424
Progesterone receptor status (negative vs. positive)0.5270.625
HER-2 status (negative vs. positive)0.9660.627
Squalene epoxidase expression (low vs. high)0.0010.001

Table V.

Multivariate analysis with Coxs proportional hazard model for prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer.

Table V.

Multivariate analysis with Coxs proportional hazard model for prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer.

Disease-free survivalOverall survival


CharacteristicsHR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
Age (≤46 vs. >46 years)0.0720.566–1.5390.7880.0380.597–1.8770.845
Tumor size (≤5 vs. >5 cm)2.8850.291–1.0920.0891.4920.320–1.3030.222
Lymph node status (negative vs. positive)6.4430.212–0.8190.0114.9220.170–0.8960.027
Stage (I/II vs. III)0.4400.394–1.5840.5071.8850.265–1.2630.170
Chemotherapy/radiotherapy (no vs. yes)1.2850.193–1.5510.2571.4840.096–1.7300.223
Squalene epoxidase expression (low vs. high)4.0790.354–0.9850.0433.5610.318–1.0220.059

[i] HR, hazard ratio.

Validation of SQLE as a prognostic biomarker using BreastMark

Following BreastMark analysis, high SQLE mRNA expression in patients with BC was significantly associated with poor prognosis in all groups [hazard ratio (HR), 1.467; P=1.57×10−10; n=2,652), lymph node negative group (HR, 1.781; P=8.53×10−8; n=1,183), lymph node positive group (HR, 1.337; P=0.011; n=744), luminal A subtype (HR, 1.427; P=0.007; n=823) and luminal B subtype (HR, 1.284; P=0.007; n=1,013) (Fig. 5). However, high SQLE mRNA expression was not associated with prognosis in patients with HER subtype (HR, 1.117; P=0.537; n=286) and basal subtype (HR, 1.169; P=0.276; n=424) (Fig. 5).

Discussion

SQLE expression is associated with pathogenesis and clinical outcome in various types of cancer (914). The present study demonstrated the upregulation of SQLE mRNA expression in DCIS and BC tissues compared with in their adjacent normal breast tissues. SQLE expression was associated with breast tumor progression and with a poor clinical outcome in patients with BC.

Cholesterol is the main sterol that is synthesized in all animal cells and is an essential structural component of cell membrane (4). An association between cholesterol and cancer has been previously recognized (6). Moreover, previous studies have indicated that inhibition at different stages of cholesterol synthesis contributes to inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, cell death and resistance to therapies in cancer (3,4,7). Overall, dysregulation of cholesterol metabolism may be a new therapeutic target in cancer treatment.

SQLE encodes squalene epoxidase, one of the major enzymes in the late stages of cholesterol synthesis (8). SQLE catalyzes the oxidation of squalene to 2,3-oxidosqualene (squalene epoxide), and its inhibition can affect the synthesis of sterols and of the cell membrane, or even cell growth (3). Previous studies have indicated that dysregulation of SQLE is involved in the molecular pathogenesis of various types of cancer and has also been associated with poor prognosis (914). SQLE has been associated with radiation resistance in pancreatic cancer (12) and metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (13), as well as with poor outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (9,10), hepatocellular carcinoma (11) and squamous lung cancer (14).

Several studies have already been conducted to explore the potential role of the dysregulation of SQLE in BC (1526). Polycarpou-Schwarz et al (16) identified a new microprotein gene, Cancer-Associated Small Integral Membrane Open reading frame 1 (CASIMO1), utilizing a microarray approach. CASIMO1 was found to be overexpressed and important for proper proliferation of breast cancer cells, and exerted its effects through interactions with SQLE maintaining lipid droplet homeostasis (16). Römer et al (15) assessed the ability of normal human mammary fibroblasts (HMFs) to induce reversion of the malignant phenotype of primary breast carcinoma cells in a three-dimensional cell culture model. The reversion of the malignant phenotype was detected in 5/13 primary breast carcinoma cell co-cultures with HMFs (15). Gene expression analysis revealed that SQLE expression was downregulated in the reverted cases compared with in the non-reverted cases (15). These findings were consistent with the role of SQLE in regulating BC progression and inhibition of differentiation (15). cDNA microarrays reported that SQLE was differentially expressed in BC and that SQLE expression was increased dramatically in cancer tissues compared with in normal and cancer-adjacent normal tissues (18,19). In the present study, SQLE expression was directly compared in sets of matched normal breast, BC and nodal metastatic tissues using RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR. In the RNA-Seq data, SQLE expression was upregulated in BC tissues compared with in matched normal breast tissues, and was unchanged when comparing nodal metastatic tissues with matched BC tissues. Based on changes in gene expression during progression from normal tissue to cancer tissue and then to metastatic node of BC, SQLE may belong to genes associated with tumorigenesis (normal-cancer transition) rather than metastasis (cancer-metastasis transition).

Although BC is believed to develop from DCIS (27), to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies that have examined the association between SQLE and tumor progression in BC, including DCIS lesions. In the present study, mRNA expression levels of SQLE in frozen DCIS and BC tissues and their adjacent normal breast tissues were assessed using RT-qPCR. The present data revealed that SQLE mRNA expression was significantly increased in DCIS and BC tissues compared with in adjacent normal tissues. This result demonstrated the oncogenic properties of SQLE in BC as well as in DCIS. However, there were no significant differences in SQLE mRNA expression between DCIS and BC. In accordance with the RT-qPCR findings, immunohistochemical analysis revealed that SQLE expression in DCIS and BC was significantly higher than that in normal breast tissues, but there was no significant difference in SQLE expression between DCIS and BC tissues. These results suggest that SQLE may serve an essential role in BC progression and may be especially activated during the process of DCIS development.

Although the underlying mechanism of SQLE dysregulation in BC remains unclear, SQLE is frequently altered by copy number gains in BC, and SQLE expression appears to be tightly regulated by increases in the copy dosage of its gene locus (17,24,26). SQLE methylation has also been associated with SQLE overexpression in BC (25).

Recently, it has been suggested that the dysregulation of SQLE may be associated with the prognosis in patients with BC. Helms et al (17) compared SQLE mRNA expression of BC cases with and without chromosomal 7p and 8q gains by suppression subtractive hybridization PCR. SQLE mRNA expression was upregulated in BC with ER+ 7p/8q gains (17). Although SQLE expression was not associated with tumor size, grade and ER or HER2 status, SQLE mRNA expression was an independent risk factor for the early onset of distant metastasis among early stage I/II BC cases (17). Simigdala et al (20) found that the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway was the common adaptive mechanism associated with acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors in the ER+ long-term estrogen-deprived cell lines. The aforementioned study analyzed in-silico data from primary patients with ER+ BC with neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy and revealed that increased on-treatment SQLE expression was significantly associated with poor response to endocrine therapy (20). Kim et al (21) found that SQLE was one of the important genes for BC metastasis based on a standardized pathway-based approach. Shkurnikov et al (22) searched for novel parameters predicting the risk of relapse in patients with BC using public microarray datasets, revealing that SQLE expression was significantly associated with the risk of relapse in patients with BC. Parada et al (23) examined racial differences in the expression levels of eight genes, including SQLE, and their associations with the risk of BC recurrence among white and black women with BC. Compared with white women, black women exhibited higher expression levels of SQLE, and high SQLE expression was associated with increased risk of BC recurrence (23). Chin et al (24) performed a high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization analysis in BC, revealing that 8q24 locus, where the SQLE gene resides, is one of the hotspot genomic regions exhibiting the strongest association between copy number gain and aberrant gene expression in high-grade, ER BC. Furthermore, amplification of 8q24 was associated with a poor prognosis independently of standard prognostic factors (24). Brown et al (26) independently confirmed that SQLE is a bona fide oncogene by amplification with clinical relevance in BC. SQLE overexpression was more prevalent in high-grade, HER2+ and hormone receptor-negative invasive BC, and was an independently significant unfavorable prognostic biomarker in BC (26). Yu et al (18) evaluated gene expression profiles from early-onset BC tissues (age of patients, <40 years) and their adjacent normal tissues to explore the genes and prognostic factors associated with BC, revealing that SQLE expression was upregulated in BC and that high SQLE expression was associated with a poor prognosis.

Most studies on SQLE in BC have been based on molecular approaches. The present study investigated whether SQLE detection by immunohistochemistry could predict the prognosis in patients with BC. High SQLE expression was more prevalent in aggressive BC, such as larger tumor size, nodal metastases, higher stage, HER2 subtype and distant metastatic relapse. High SQLE expression was associated with poor disease-free survival and overall survival, and independently predicted unfavorable disease-free survival in patients with BC. SQLE was subsequently verified as a prognostic biomarker for BC using the public BreastMark database. High SQLE mRNA expression was significantly associated with a poor prognosis in the ‘all’, lymph node negative, lymph node positive, luminal A subtype and luminal B subtype groups. The present results support the findings of previous studies (17,18,2024,26) and suggest that high SQLE expression assessed by immunohistochemistry may be associated with a more aggressive phenotype in BC and may be used as a prognostic marker in patients with BC.

In the present study, high SQLE expression in DCIS was significantly associated with high nuclear grade, comedo-type necrosis and HER2 positivity, which are risk factors for DCIS recurrence or progression (27). However, high SQLE expression was not associated with the recurrence of DCIS. Considering the potential prognostic value of SQLE expression in patients with DCIS, further studies in a large cohort of DCIS cases with long-term follow-up period are required.

Several studies have demonstrated that SQLE promotes cancer cell proliferation and migration, and the presence of SQLE inhibitors in both in vitro and in vivo models causes cancer cell death (11,13). Brown et al (26) demonstrated that SQLE inhibition decreased the viability of a BC cell line in a copy-dosage-dependent way and increased the doubling time only in BC cell lines with high SQLE expression. In the present study, SQLE mRNA expression was significantly increased in BC tissues compared with in adjacent normal breast tissues. The current findings may pave the way for the development of novel therapeutic strategies aimed at SQLE in BC. Further studies in vivo, such as animal models of BC, are required to elucidate the mechanism of action of SQLE in promoting BC and to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of SQLE inhibitors for the treatment of BC.

The selection of appropriate internal control genes is crucial for proper interpretation of RT-qPCR data. In the present study, only the GAPDH gene was used as an internal reference control because the mRNA expression levels were constant in different tissue samples. It is recommended to use at least two reference genes to increase the resolution and accuracy of the RT-qPCR analysis (37). Therefore, the accuracy of the RT-qPCR results in the present study may be limited.

In summary, the current results suggested that upregulation of SQLE expression serves an important role in BC progression. Analysis of SQLE expression by immunohistochemistry may be a useful biomarker to predict the prognosis in patients with BC. Therefore, the present findings may open the way for further research in clinical settings to assess the relevance of SQLE inhibition as a new treatment option in patients with BC.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by a grant from the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital Institute for Biomedical Science (grant no. HCRI20013).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy and other restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

NIK conceived the experiments and wrote the manuscript. NC designed the experiments. MHP prepared the samples. NIK and MHP performed the experiments and confirmed the authenticity of all the raw data. NIK and NC processed and analyzed the data. SSK designed the study, performed statistical analysis and edited the manuscript. JSL developed the project, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote and revised the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was a retrospective study that utilized archived materials of normal, DCIS and BC tissues and did not impact patient care; hence, approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (Jeollanam, Republic of Korea) without patient consent (reference no. CNUHH-2020-056).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Park EH, Min SY, Kim Z, Yoon CS, Jung KW, Nam SJ, Oh SJ, Lee S, Park BW, Lim W, et al Korean Breast Cancer Society, : Basic facts of breast cancer in Korea in 2014: The 10-year overall survival progress. J Breast Cancer. 20:1–11. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Akram M, Iqbal M, Daniyal M and Khan AU: Awareness and current knowledge of breast cancer. Biol Res. 50:332017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Cirmena G, Franceschelli P, Isnaldi E, Ferrando L, De Mariano M, Ballestrero A and Zoppoli G: Squalene epoxidase as a promising metabolic target in cancer treatment. Cancer Lett. 425:13–20. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Silvente-Poirot S and Poirot M: Cholesterol metabolism and cancer: The good, the bad and the ugly. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 12:673–676. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Hu J, Locasale JW, Bielas JH, O'Sullivan J, Sheahan K, Cantley LC, Vander Heiden MG and Vitkup D: Heterogeneity of tumor-induced gene expression changes in the human metabolic network. Nat Biotechnol. 31:522–529. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Silvente-Poirot S and Poirot M: Cancer. Cholesterol and cancer, in the balance. Science. 343:1445–1446. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Silvente-Poirot S and Poirot M: Cholesterol epoxide hydrolase and cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 12:696–703. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Nagai M, Sakakibara J, Wakui K, Fukushima Y, Igarashi S, Tsuji S, Arakawa M and Ono T; Nagai M1, ; Sakakibara J, Wakui K, Fukushima Y, Igarashi S, Tsuji S, Arakawa M and Ono T: Localization of the squalene epoxidase gene (SQLE) to human chromosome region 8q24.1. Genomics. 44:141–143. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Stopsack KH, Gerke TA, Sinnott JA, Penney KL, Tyekucheva S, Sesso HD, Andersson SO, Andrén O, Cerhan JR, Giovannucci EL, et al: Cholesterol metabolism and prostate cancer lethality. Cancer Res. 76:4785–4790. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Stopsack KH, Gerke TA, Andrén O, Andersson SO, Giovannucci EL, Mucci LA and Rider JR: Cholesterol uptake and regulation in high-grade and lethal prostate cancers. Carcinogenesis. 38:806–811. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Liu D, Wong CC, Fu L, Chen H, Zhao L, Li C, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Xu W, Yang Y, et al: Squalene epoxidase drives NAFLD-induced hepatocellular carcinoma and is a pharmaceutical target. Sci Transl Med. 10:4372018. View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Souchek JJ, Baine MJ, Lin C, Rachagani S, Gupta S, Kaur S, Lester K, Zheng D, Chen S, Smith L, et al: Unbiased analysis of pancreatic cancer radiation resistance reveals cholesterol biosynthesis as a novel target for radiosensitisation. Br J Cancer. 111:1139–1149. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Qin Y, Zhang Y, Tang Q, Jin L and Chen Y: SQLE induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by regulating of miR-133b in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 49:138–148. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Zhang HY, Li HM, Yu Z, Yu XY and Guo K: Expression and significance of squalene epoxidase in squamous lung cancerous tissues and pericarcinoma tissues. Thorac Cancer. 5:275–280. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Römer AM, Lühr I, Klein A, Friedl A, Sebens S, Rösel F, Arnold N, Strauss A, Jonat W and Bauer M: Normal mammary fibroblasts induce reversion of the malignant phenotype in human primary breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 33:1525–1536. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Polycarpou-Schwarz M, Gross M, Mestdagh P, Schott J, Grund SE, Hildenbrand C, Rom J, Aulmann S, Sinn HP, Vandesompele J, et al: The cancer-associated microprotein CASIMO1 controls cell proliferation and interacts with squalene epoxidase modulating lipid droplet formation. Oncogene. 37:4750–4768. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Helms MW, Kemming D, Pospisil H, Vogt U, Buerger H, Korsching E, Liedtke C, Schlotter CM, Wang A, Chan SY, et al: Squalene epoxidase, located on chromosome 8q24.1, is upregulated in 8q+ breast cancer and indicates poor clinical outcome in stage I and II disease. Br J Cancer. 99:774–780. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Yu Z, He Q and Xu G: Screening of prognostic factors in early-onset breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. Feb 7–2020.(Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1177/1533033819893670. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

D'Arcy M, Fleming J, Robinson WR, Kirk EL, Perou CM and Troester MA: Race-associated biological differences among Luminal A breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 152:437–448. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Simigdala N, Gao Q, Pancholi S, Roberg-Larsen H, Zvelebil M, Ribas R, Folkerd E, Thompson A, Bhamra A, Dowsett M, et al: Cholesterol biosynthesis pathway as a novel mechanism of resistance to estrogen deprivation in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 18:582016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Kim S, Kon M and DeLisi C: Pathway-based classification of cancer subtypes. Biol Direct. 7:212012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Shkurnikov MY, Galatenko VV, Lebedev AE, Podol'skii VE, Tonevitskii EA and Mal'tseva DV: On statistical relationship between ADRA2A expression and the risk of breast cancer relapse. Bull Exp Biol Med. 157:454–458. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Parada H Jr, Sun X, Fleming JM, Williams-DeVane CR, Kirk EL, Olsson LT, Perou CM, Olshan AF and Troester MA: Race-associated biological differences among luminal A and basal-like breast cancers in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Breast Cancer Res. 19:1312017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Chin SF, Teschendorff AE, Marioni JC, Wang Y, Barbosa-Morais NL, Thorne NP, Costa JL, Pinder SE, van de Wiel MA, Green AR, et al: High-resolution aCGH and expression profiling identifies a novel genomic subtype of ER negative breast cancer. Genome Biol. 8:R2152007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Parris TZ, Kovács A, Hajizadeh S, Nemes S, Semaan M, Levin M, Karlsson P and Helou K: Frequent MYC coamplification and DNA hypomethylation of multiple genes on 8q in 8p11-p12-amplified breast carcinomas. Oncogenesis. 3:e952014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Brown DN, Caffa I, Cirmena G, Piras D, Garuti A, Gallo M, Alberti S, Nencioni A, Ballestrero A and Zoppoli G: Squalene epoxidase is a bona fide oncogene by amplification with clinical relevance in breast cancer. Sci Rep. 6:194352016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Schnitt SJ, Allred C, Britton P, Ellis IO, Lakhani SR, Morrow M, Palazzo J, Reynolds C, Rutgers E, Simpson J, et al: Ductal carcinoma in situ. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Tan PH and van de Vijver MJ: IARC Press; Lyon: pp. 90–94. 2012

28 

Kim GE, Kim NI, Lee JS, Park MH and Kang K: Differentially expressed genes in matched normal, cancer, and lymph node metastases predict clinical outcomes in patients with breast cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 28:111–122. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Madden SF, Clarke C, Gaule P, Aherne ST, O'Donovan N, Clynes M, Crown J and Gallagher WM: BreastMark: An integrated approach to mining publicly available transcriptomic datasets relating to breast cancer outcome. Breast Cancer Res. 15:R522013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Xu YF, Yi Y, Qiu SJ, Gao Q, Li YW, Dai CX, Cai MY, Ju MJ, Zhou J, Zhang BH, et al: PEBP1 downregulation is associated to poor prognosis in HCC related to hepatitis B infection. J Hepatol. 53:872–879. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−ΔΔC(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, Fitzgibbons PL, Francis G, Goldstein NS, Hayes M, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 134:907–922. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

33 

Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, Dowsett M, Fitzgibbons PL, Hanna WM, Langer A, et al American Society of Clinical Oncology; College of American Pathologists, : American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 25:118–145. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Bae YK, Gong G, Kang J, Lee A, Cho EY, Lee JS, Suh KS, Lee DW and Jung WH; Breast Pathology Study Group of Korean Society of Pathologists, : HER2 status by standardized immunohistochemistry and silver-enhanced in situ hybridization in Korean breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 15:381–387. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Kim GE, Kim JH, Lee KH, Choi YD, Lee JS, Lee JH, Nam JH, Choi C, Park MH and Yoon JH: Stromal matrix metalloproteinase-14 expression correlates with the grade and biological behavior of mammary phyllodes tumors. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 20:298–303. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Jardel P, Debiais C, Godet J, Irani J and Fromont G: Ductal carcinoma of the prostate shows a different immunophenotype from high grade acinar cancer. Histopathology. 63:57–63. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Kozera B and Rapacz M: Reference genes in real-time PCR. J Appl Genet. 54:391–406. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2021
Volume 21 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kim NI, Park MH, Kweon S, Cho N and Lee JS: Squalene epoxidase expression is associated with breast tumor progression and with a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Oncol Lett 21: 259, 2021.
APA
Kim, N.I., Park, M.H., Kweon, S., Cho, N., & Lee, J.S. (2021). Squalene epoxidase expression is associated with breast tumor progression and with a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Oncology Letters, 21, 259. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12520
MLA
Kim, N. I., Park, M. H., Kweon, S., Cho, N., Lee, J. S."Squalene epoxidase expression is associated with breast tumor progression and with a poor prognosis in breast cancer". Oncology Letters 21.4 (2021): 259.
Chicago
Kim, N. I., Park, M. H., Kweon, S., Cho, N., Lee, J. S."Squalene epoxidase expression is associated with breast tumor progression and with a poor prognosis in breast cancer". Oncology Letters 21, no. 4 (2021): 259. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12520