Open Access

The effect of the area proportion of the metastatic lesion within the central metastatic lymph node on response to therapy in papillary thyroid carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Liuhong Shi
    • Liang Zhou
    • Jianbiao Wang
    • Lei Jin
    • Yinjiao Lei
    • Lian Xia
    • Lei Xie
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 12, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12545
  • Article Number: 284
  • Copyright: © Shi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Lymph node (LN) metastasis has been strongly associated with locoregional recurrence and decreased survival time of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Although the characteristics of the metastatic LNs (mLN) have been determined, including size, number, micro‑metastasis and extra‑nodal extension (ENE), further analysis is warranted. The present study introduced a new parameter known as the area proportion of the metastatic lesion within the central mLNs (APmCLN). The objective was to evaluate the impact of the APmCLN on response to therapy in patients with PTC. In total, 355 patients with PTC treated with total thyroidectomy and neck dissection, post‑operative radioactive iodine and thyroid‑stimulating hormone suppression were retrospectively studied. The patients were classified into two groups: Group A (APmCLN ≤75%) and group B (APmCLN >75%). The association of various clinicopathological characteristics between these two groups was investigated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate risk factors associated with a non‑Excellent response to therapy and recurrence‑free survival (RFS). The analysis showed that APmCLN >75% was significantly associated with extra‑thyroidal extension, clinically apparent nodes (cN1), pathological N1b (pN1b), ENE, greater number and larger size of central mLN and larger size of the central LN metastatic lesion. Furthermore, it was reported that chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, larger central mLN size and APmCLN >75% were independent risk factors for a non‑excellent response to therapy. Finally, it was determined that the rate of excellent response to therapy was significantly higher in pathological N1 (pN1) patients with APmCLN ≤75% (108/144, 75.0%) compared with patients with APmCLN >75% (27/47, 57.4%) (P=0.022). However, there was no significant difference (P=0.247) between patients with APmCLN ≤75% and pN0 (132/164, 80.5%). RFS was 89.4% in patients with pN1‑APmCLN >75%, whereas those with pN1‑APmCLN ≤75% and pN0 did not experience a relapse. Patients with PTC with APmCLN >75% should be regarded as high‑risk and may require more aggressive treatment and careful follow‑up.

Introduction

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is one of the most common endocrine malignancies and has a 10-year survival rate of 90–98% globally (14). Risk factors including age (>45 years), male sex, larger tumor size and distant metastasis contribute to poor survival based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (5). Despite the fact that the number of metastatic lymph nodes (mLNs) has been recognized as a negative prognostic factor, other features of mLNs have yet to be fully understood. Recently, the characteristics of mLNs, in particular, size, extra-nodal extension (ENE) and micro-metastasis (<0.2 cm as the largest dimension of the metastatic lesion) were initially proposed by the 2015 updated version of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines (68).

PTC often metastasizes to lymph nodes (LNs), especially in the central neck region, and the size of the metastatic lesion within the LN tends to reflect the degree of disease progression (9,10). However, the status of the metastatic lesion within a mLN varies to a large extent. This may include varying metastatic deposit sizes in different LNs of varying size (8,11). Therefore, it is reasonable to be concerned with not only the metastatic lesion size, but also the location within the LN. To better reflect the disease progression of patients with PTC, the present study proposed a novel parameter: The area proportion of the metastatic lesion within the central mLN (APmCLN).

The post-operative risk of recurrence during follow-up should be estimated dynamically according to the response to therapy re-staging system (2015 version of the ATA guidelines) (7). Previous studies have suggested that the therapeutic response system is closely correlated with prognosis (1216). The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of APmCLN on the response to therapy in patients with PTC.

Materials and methods

Patients

Between January 2013 and December 2015, 562 patients with PTC were enrolled onto the study at the Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (Zhejiang, China), and 355 of those underwent a total thyroidectomy (TT) with ipsilateral or bilateral central neck dissection (CND) (Fig. 1). Inclusion criteria were patients with pathologically diagnosed PTC. Exclusion criteria included no PTC diagnosis, poorly differentiated PTC (diagnostic criteria were based on the consensus Turin proposal) (6), coexisting other malignancies, previous thyroidectomy and no radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation. After surgery, a histological diagnosis of PTC and measurements of mLN were confirmed by two experienced pathologists from the Department of Pathology, who were independent from the present study. Of the 355 patients that met the final selection criteria, 191 and 164 were designated as pN1 and pN0, respectively (Fig. 1) (17). In the conventional Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging system established by the Union for International Cancer Control and the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC; 2010, 7th edition), pathologically confirmed lymph node metastasis was defined as pN1, no lymph node metastasis was defined as pN0. The study was approved by The Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and all enrolled patients provided written informed consent.

Treatment protocol

In accordance with the 2009 ATA guidelines (6), TT was performed if the patient met one of the following criteria: Bilateral nodularity, extra-thyroidal extension (ETE), tumor diameter >1 cm, mulifocal lesions in the affected lobe, regional or distant metastases, a personal history of radiation therapy to the head and neck or a first-degree family history of PTC. Ipsilateral CND was performed routinely for the affected side, regardless of whether the central neck LNs were clinically metastatic. Bilateral CND was performed for patients whose tumor(s) was located in the isthmus or both lobes, or for those with clinical metastasis in the neck LNs. Modified lateral neck dissection (LND), including levels II–IV or together with V, was performed only in patients with clinically evident nodal disease in the lateral neck on preoperative ultrasonography or when the ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of a lateral node exhibited positive results. RAI remnant ablation was performed postoperatively in all patients according to the 2009 ATA guidelines (6). Only the LNs from the central area were examined, which were derived from patients who underwent CND with or without LND.

Histopathological examination

Tissues with thyroid, tumor(s) and LN(s) were collected from each patient during surgery and were sent immediately to the Department of Pathology. Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin at 4°C overnight, dehydrated using graded ethanol (100, 95, 75 and 50%) and embedded in paraffin. If the thickness of the LNs was <6 mm, they were embedded entirely in paraffin, cut in half, and then sliced into three 3–4-µm pieces. If a LN was >6 mm in thickness, it was selected to be embedded and cut in half. All of the slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) prior to pathological diagnosis (18). In the event of suspicious micro-metastasis, thyroglobulin (Tg) immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed (19,20). For IHC, slides were incubated with a primary monoclonal rabbit anti-Thyroglobulin-antibody (1:300 dilution; Abcam; ab156008) at room temperature for 60 min. Then, the slides were incubated with a secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibody (ImmPress Reagent Kit; MP-7405; peroxidase-conjugated) followed by target detection using DAB plus chromogen for 10 min (Gene Tex; GTX73338). All mLNs in the central neck were observed using light microscopy (magnification, ×200-400) and measured by two experienced pathologists using an ocular micrometer, and the mean value of the measurements was recorded. In total, 2,768 central LNs were examined, of which 670 were positive, and the one with the largest size, lesion, or metastatic area was selected as the representative parameter for each patient.

Definitions

A new parameter (APmCLN) was identified and defined as the ratio of the metastatic deposit area to the whole mLN area in a cross-section, which was microscopically measured by a cross and divided into four quadrants: i) ≤25% (1 Quadrant occupied by the metastatic lesion), ii) 25–50% (2 quadrants occupied by the metastatic lesion), iii) 50–75% (3 quadrants occupied by the metastatic lesion) and iv) >75% (4 quadrants almost occupied by the metastatic lesion) (Fig. 2). When evaluating independent risk factors for treatment response, there was no statistical significance between group i) and ii)+iii)+iv), groups i)+ii) and iii)+iv). However, differences between groups i) +ii) +iii) and iv) were statistically significant. Therefore, groups i)-iii) were merged into group A and group iv) was merged into group B.

Micro-metastasis was defined as the presence of metastatic deposits within a LN <2 mm in diameter, which is a parameter commonly used in breast cancer and other solid tumors (11). Micro-metastasis has been a proposed modification expressed in the 2015 ATA guidelines as a low-risk parameter (7). Patients presenting with histopathological criteria including diffuse infiltration of the thyroid gland with lymphocytes and other inflammation-related cells were diagnosed with chronic lymphocyte thyroiditis (CLT) (21).

The current definition of ‘clinically apparent’ LN metastasis (clinical N1 disease; cN1) includes any metastatic LN identified by palpation or imaging either before initial surgery or intraoperatively (8). When suspicious LN appeared at level VI or II–IV, it was defined as cN1a or cN1b, respectively.

Assessment of treatment response

The response to the therapy re-staging system has been designed for the follow-up of patients with PTC in the 2015 ATA guidelines. According to biochemical, imaging and cyto-pathological findings, there are four response-to-therapy categories for patients treated with TT and RAI remnant ablation (7). These include: i) Excellent response, ii) biochemical incomplete response, iii) structural incomplete response and iv) indeterminate response. The current study rearranged these into two categories consisting of excellent response and non-excellent response. The latter included biochemical incomplete, structural incomplete and indeterminate responses. According to the ATA guidelines, the recurrence rate for the excellent response group is 1–4%, which is much lower compared with other groups (biochemical incomplete response, 20% develop structural disease; structural incomplete response, 50–85% continue to have persistent disease despite additional therapy and indeterminate response, 15–20% will have structural disease) (7).

All patients with PTC were followed up after completion of RAI remnant ablation. Routine neck ultrasound examination, and measurement of serum Tg and anti-thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) were performed in a state of TSH (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone) suppression every 3 months in the first year and every 6–12 months thereafter. When biochemical or structural incomplete response occurred, more frequent follow-up was recommended with additional examinations (including CT scan and Fine Needle Aspiration) were proposed. The follow-up time for all PTCs ranged from 40 to 75 months (median, 57 months), and the assessment of response to therapy was based on the latest examination results. Serum Tg (normal range, 1.15–35.00 ng/ml) and TgAb (normal range, 0–4.11 IU/ml) were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay in an Abbott Aeroset® Automated Instrument Analyzer (Canon Medical Systems Corp.) (2224).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables and categorical variables were determined by Mann-Whitney U test and χ2 test (including Fisher's exact tests, if needed), respectively. Bonferroni's correction was also applied where appropriate. The results are presented as medians with range and numbers with percentages. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed for sex, age, tumor size, tumor multifocality, ETE, CLT, N stage, number and size of central metastatic LN, the size of central metastatic lesion and APmCLN. The variables exhibiting P<0.05 in the univariate analysis were then selected and analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The results were represented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For all analyses, two-sided tests were employed and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 23.0 (IBM Corp.).

Results

Characteristics of patients with PTC with TT

The profiles of 562 patients are shown in Fig. 1. Among them, 207 underwent lobectomy, 355 underwent total thyroidectomy (TT), and these 355 patients included 311 cases of cN0 and 44 cN1. The clinicopathological characteristics of the 355 PTC patients are in Table I. The median age of the cohort was 42 years (range, 13–72 years). Most of the patients were female (77.2%) and were <55 years-old (83.9%). The majority of patients (234/355, 65.9%) were diagnosed with papillary thyroid micro-carcinoma (PTMC, primary tumor size ≤1 cm). Multifocality, CLT, and ETE were found in 56.1 (199/355), 26.5 (94/355) and 32.4% (115/355) of patients, respectively. The clinical N stage included 311 cN0 (87.6%), 7 cN1a (2.0%) and 37 cN1b (10.4%) patients, whereas the pathological N stage included 164 pN0 (46.2%), 154 pN1a (43.4%) and and 37 pN1b (10.4%) patients. An excellent response to primary therapy was observed in 267 patients (75.2%). For ATA risk stratification, there were 157 (44.2%), 100 (28.2%) and 98 (27.6%) patients in low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories, respectively.

Table I.

Characteristics of 355 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent total thyroidectomy.

Table I.

Characteristics of 355 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent total thyroidectomy.

CharacteristicsTotal
Sexa
  Male81 (22.8)
  Female274 (77.2)
Age of diagnosis, years
  Median (range), year42 (13–72)
  <55a298 (83.9)
  ≥55a57 (16.1)
Primary tumor size, cma
  ≤1234 (65.9)
  >1121 (34.1)
Multifocalitya
  Absent156 (43.9)
  Present199 (56.1)
CLTa
  Absent261 (73.5)
  Present94 (26.5)
ETEa
  Absent240 (67.6)
  Present115 (32.4)
Clinical Node stagea
  cN0311 (87.6)
  cN1a7 (2.0)
  cN1b37 (10.4)
Pathological Node stagea
  pN0164 (46.2)
  pN1a154 (43.4)
  pN1b37 (10.4)
Distant metastasisa
  Absent352 (99.2)
  Present3 (0.8)
ATA response-to-therapy categorya
  Excellent response267 (72.5)
  Biochemical incomplete response1 (0.3)
  Structural incomplete response15 (4.2)
  Indeterminate response72 (20.3)
ATA risk stratificationa
  Low157 (44.2)
  Intermediate100 (28.2)
  High98 (27.6)

a Presented as n (%). c, clinically apparent; N, node; p, pathological; ATA, American Thyroid Association; ETE, extra-thyroidal extension; CLT, chronic lymphocyte thyroiditis.

Clinicopathological features associated with the APmCLN of patients with pN1-PTC

Comparison of the postoperative pathological results revealed several factors that were significantly different between group A (APmCLN ≤75%) and group B (APmCLN >75%). A larger APmCLN (>75%) was associated with aggressive characteristics, including ETE (P=0.019), clinical node stage (P<0.001) and pathological node stage (P<0.001). To describe the features of the mLNs, a statistical analysis was performed for the number and size of the central mLN and the size and ENE of the metastatic foci. It was demonstrated that these factors were significantly different between the two groups (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). According to the 2015 ATA guidelines, the mLN ≤5 and micro-metastasis factors belong to the low-risk category. It was reported that these two factors were significantly higher in group A compared with group B (88.2 vs. 63.8% and 71.5 vs. 10.6%, respectively; both P<0.001). Therefore, in group A, the proportion of low- and intermediate-risk categories was 70.1%, whereas in group B, the proportion of intermediate- and high-risk categories was 89.4%. An APmCLN was associated with the risk stratification of disease recurrence (Table II).

Table II.

Characteristics of 191 patients with pN1-papillary thyroid carcinoma according to the APmCLN.

Table II.

Characteristics of 191 patients with pN1-papillary thyroid carcinoma according to the APmCLN.

APmCLN

CharacteristicsGroup A ≤75%, n=144Group B >75%, n=47P-value
Sexa
  Male37 (25.7)19 (40.4)0.054
  Female107 (74.3)28 (59.6)
Age of diagnosis, years
  Median (range)39.5 (20.0–69.0)37.0 (25.0–66.0)0.786
  <55a126 (87.5)44 (93.6)0.244
  ≥55a18 (12.5)3 (6.4)
Primary tumor size, cma
  ≤184 (58.3)22 (46.8)0.167
  >160 (41.7)25 (53.2)
Multifocalitya
  Absent62 (43.1)21 (44.7)0.845
  Present82 (56.9)26 (55.3)
ETEa
  Absent95 (66.0)22 (46.8)0.019
  Present49 (34.0)25 (53.2)
CLTa
  Absent108 (75.0)39 (83.0)0.259
  Present36 (25.0)8 (17.0)
Clinical Node stagea
  cN0123 (85.4)24 (51.1)<0.001
  cN121 (14.6)23 (48.9)
Pathological Node stagea
  pN1a128 (88.9)26 (55.3)<0.001
  pN1b16 (11.1)21 (44.7)
Number of central mLN
  Median (range)2.0 (1.0–19.0)5.0 (1.0–18.0)<0.001
  ≤5a127 (88.2)30 (63.8)<0.001
  >5a17(11.8)17 (36.2)
Size of central mLN, mm
  Median (range)4.33 (0.67–14.90)6.40 (1.07–18.27)0.001
Size of central LN metastatic foci, mm
  Median (range)1.34 (0.07–6.80)5.33 (1.07–18.27)<0.001
  <2a103 (71.5)5 (10.6)<0.001
  ≥2a41 (28.5)42 (89.4)
ENEa
  Absent135 (93.8)30 (63.8)<0.001
  Present9 (6.2)17 (36.2)
ATA response-to-therapy categoriesa
  Excellent response108 (75.0)27 (57.4)0.022
  Non-excellent response36 (25.0)20 (42.6)
ATA risk stratificationa
  Low52 (36.1)5 (10.6)0.003
  Intermediate49 (34.0)19 (40.4)
  High43 (29.9)23 (49.0)

a Presented as n (%). APmCLN, area proportion of the metastatic lesion within the central metastatic lymph node; CLT, chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis; ETE, extra-thyroidal extension; LN, lymph node; mLN, metastatic lymph node; ENE, extra-nodal extension; ATA, American Thyroid Association; c, clinically apparent; N, node; p, pathological.

Risk factors for non-excellent response to therapy of patients with pN1-PTC

Response to initial therapy was analyzed in all patients. The proportion of excellent responders in groups A and B were 75 and 57.4%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.022; Table II). The risk factors for non-excellent response to therapy in patients with pN1 PTC were further analyzed (Table III). Univariate analysis indicated that CLT (P<0.001), a higher quantity of central mLN (P=0.004), larger sizes of central mLN (P<0.001) and their metastatic foci (P=0.025) and higher APmCLN (P=0.023) significantly increased the risk of classification into the non-excellent response to therapy category. Furthermore, CLT, size of central mLN and APmCLN were independent variables for response to therapy in multivariate analysis (P<0.00, P=0.014 and P=0.020, respectively). Compared with cases without CLT, those with CLT were 5.405 times (95% CI, 2.339–12.492; P<0.001) more likely to exhibit a non-excellent response to therapy. For cases with an incremental increase of 1 mm in central mLN size, the non-excellent risk increased by 1.283 times (95% CI, 2.339–12.492; P=0.014). For PTCs with APmCLN >75%, the rate was 3.917 times higher compared with that of APmCLN ≤75% (95% CI, 1.245–12.327; P=0.020). Therefore, it was demonstrated that APmCLN (≤75 vs. >75%) represents a new independent risk factor for predicting clinical outcome.

Table III.

Relationships between clinicopathological variables and non-excellent response-to-therapy in patients with pN1-papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Table III.

Relationships between clinicopathological variables and non-excellent response-to-therapy in patients with pN1-papillary thyroid carcinoma.

UnivariateMultivariate


CharacteristicsOR (95% CI)P-valueOR (95% CI)P-value
Sex, male vs. female1.546 (0.754–3.171)0.235
Age of diagnosis, <55 vs. ≥55 years0.534 (0.171–1.664)0.279
Primary tumor size, ≤1 vs. >1 cm1.116 (0.597–2.087)0.730
Multifocality, absent vs. present1.755 (0.918–3.356)0.089
ETE, absent vs. present0.833 (0.437–1.590)0.580
CLT, absent vs. present6.462 (3.114–13.413)<0.0015.405 (2.339–12.492)<0.001
Pathological N stage, pN1a vs. pN1b1.623 (0.764–3.447)0.207
Clinical N stage, cN0 vs. cN11.529 (0.749–3.120)0.244
Number of central mLN, ≤5 vs. >53.026 (1.410–6.493)0.0042.082 (0.821–5.280)0.123
Size of central mLN, mm1.216 (1.103–1.341)<0.0011.283 (1.051–1.566)0.014
Size of central LN metastatic foci, mm1.110 (1.013–1.215)0.0250.823 (0.652–1.039)0.102
APmCLN, ≤25 vs. >25%1.148 (0.610–2.158)0.669
APmCLN, ≤50 vs. >50%1.826 (0.973–3.428)0.061
APmCLN, ≤75 vs. >75%2.222 (1.114–4.432)0.0233.917 (1.245–12.327)0.020
ENE, absent vs. present1.083 (0.441–2.659)0.861

[i] APmCLN, area proportion of the metastatic lesion within the central metastatic lymph node; CLT, chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis; ETE, extra-thyroidal extension; LN, lymph node; mLN, metastatic lymph node; c, clinically apparent; N, node; p, pathological.

Effect of the pathological metastasis of central LN on the Response to therapy category

It was observed that APmCLN affects the response to initial therapy in patients with pN1-PTC. The response to therapy in patients classified as pN0 was further analyzed. A statistically significant difference in excellent response to therapy was observed between patients in the APmCLN ≤75% and APmCLN >75% (P=0.022) categories, after using Bonferroni's correction, it still passed the statistical significance (P=0.022 <0.050/2). The excellent response to therapy rates were 75 and 57.4%, respectively. Notably, when comparing the pN0 and pN1-APmCLN ≤75% groups, there was no statistical difference in the rate of achieving an excellent response to treatment (P=0.247), and the incidence rates for these two groups were 80.5 and 75.0%, respectively (Table IV). Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that APmCLN >75% will make Response to therapy worse than APmCLN ≤75%.

Table IV.

Response to therapy categories on the pathological metastasis of central lymph node of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma treated with total thyroidectomy.

Table IV.

Response to therapy categories on the pathological metastasis of central lymph node of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma treated with total thyroidectomy.

ATA response-to-therapy categories, n (%)

CharacteristicsExcellentNon-ExcellentP-value
pN0132 (80.5)32 (19.5)0.247a
pN1-APmCLN ≤75%108 (75.0)36 (25.0)0.022b
pN1-APmCLN >75%27 (57.4)20 (42.6)

a χ2 test for pN0 vs. APmCLN <75% of pN1

b χ2 test for APmCLN ≤75% vs. APmCLN >75% of pN1. APmCLN, area proportion of the metastatic lesion within the central metastatic lymph node.

Recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to the APmCLN

In total, five cases of disease recurrence were identified during the median follow-up period of 57 months (range, 40–75 months) across all patients with PTC who underwent TT. The mean time of recurrence was 25.8 months. According to the APmCLN, the number of recurrence cases was higher in the pN1-APmCLN >75% group compared with the pN1-APmCLN ≤75% group (5/47 vs. 0/144, respectively), and the RFS was also significantly different between the two groups (89.4 vs. 100%; log-rank P<0.001). In addition, RFS of the pN1-APmCLN ≤75% and pN0 patients were both 100% and no patients relapsed (Fig. 3). Therefore, pN1-APmCLN >75% indicates a higher recurrence rate in PTC patients.

Discussion

PTC is generally an indolent disease that has an excellent prognosis. The SEER registry study concluded that the overall survival rate at 14 years is 82% in cases of PTC without LN metastases and 79% with nodal metastases in America (25). Therefore, an understanding of which patients require long-term follow-up for assessing disease status is needed. Methods to reduce the risk of recurrence and disease-specific death is also important. Previous studies have shown that the evaluation of clinical outcome in patients with PTC should be dynamically adjusted throughout the observation period (2629). A key step in risk re-evaluation is to assess the response to primary therapy and analyze the clinical data obtained from imaging, biochemical and cytopathological examination during dynamic monitoring, especially within the first 2 years of follow-up (7,15). According to the ATA guidelines, the response to therapy re-classification describes differences in clinical status and outcomes at various points during the observed progress period (7). For example, one study demonstrated a recurrence rate of 1–4% in the excellent response group, while for the remaining three groups, the likelihood of disease recurrence, persistence or progression is significantly increased (7).

The weight of LN metastasis has been decreased in the assessment of the new TNM system in patients with PTC. The nodal status does not affect TNM staging in patients <55 years old. In patients >55 years old with T1 or T2, N1 can promote the stage from I to II (17). However, LN metastasis in the central neck occurs frequently in PTC (10) and correlates with locoregional recurrence (8,30). Therefore, for the assessment of recurrent risk according to the 2015 ATA guidelines, the extent of LN involvement, including the number and size of mLN and LN metastasis, was added and emphasized (7). In previous years, some researchers have been concerned with the impact of other mLN parameters on PTC biological behavior and prognosis, such as ENE (31), cancerous nodules of LNs (32) and the ratio of metastatic LNs to total LNs removed (33,34). In the present study, APmCLN was initially introduced as a new parameter and its effect on PTC prognosis was analyzed.

Although five mLNs in cN0, micro-metastasis and the central mLN (mCLN) size were added to the 2015 ATA guidelines as new factors of recurrence risk assessment, the two parameters were not found to affect the response of initial treatment in the current study. The risk factors of non-excellent response to therapy were also evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. The presence of CLT, larger size mCLN and APmCLN >75% were independent risk factors for non-excellent response to therapy in patients with PTC with pN1.

There is no definitive conclusion as to whether CLT is linked with a particular set of clinicopathological characteristics or prognosis in PTC. Some studies have shown that multifocality and LN metastasis occurs more frequently in patients with CLT (3537). In contrast, other studies found associations between the presence of CLT and improved features, such as smaller tumor size, less advanced TNM stage, lower frequency of LN metastasis and improved prognosis (3840). In the present study, CLT was recognized as a risk factor for non-excellent response to therapy in PTC. One of the characteristics of CLT is abnormally elevated TgAb that does not return to normal within 2 years in some patients after TT (4143). The increased TgAb may interfere with the measurement of Tg, which would affect evaluation of the initial treatment response (4446). Therefore, it was hypothesized that CLT may not be suitable for predicting treatment response.

The size of the mCLN is an important prognostic factor for patients with PTC, and larger mCLNs tend to be more aggressive. Ito et al (47) showed that the presence of mLN >1.5 cm is associated with a significantly lower disease-free survival rate compared with patients with either N0 disease or patients with pN1 disease <1.5 cm. Similarly, Sugitani et al (48) reported that in patients with pN1 disease with the largest mLN (>3 cm, 27%), the risk of recurrence within 10 years after TT and neck dissection without RAI ablation was significantly higher compared with pN1 patients (<3 cm, 11%). In the present study, larger-sized central mLN was significantly associated with an increased risk of non-excellent response to therapy. However, because of the long-term stimulation of inflammation, the central LNs of CLT are relatively larger. Therefore, it may be unreasonable to consider the larger mCLN size as an independent risk factor for poor treatment response if the inference factor of CLT is not ruled out.

To better reflect the metastatic extent of LNs, the present study put forward the novel parameter of APmCLN, which includes two factors. These are the size of the metastatic LN and its metastatic foci, and whether the influence of inflammation due to CLT may be ruled out. This was conducted so that the definition of APmCLN is more scientific and rational. Previous studies have reported that the sizes of mLN and LN metastasis are indicators of tumor aggressiveness and risk factors for prognosis in PTC (47,4951). However, coexisting CLT, the frequently changing size of mCLN changes and the size of mLN foci were not independent risk factors for non-excellent response to therapy in the current study. It is inaccurate to predict treatment response based only on CLT and the size of mLNs, therefore the present study included APmCLN and systematically analyzed its clinicopathological and prognostic value in patients with pN1-PTC after TT and CND. APmCLN >75% exhibited worse clinicopathological features, a poor prognosis and may be regarded as a new independent risk factor for non-excellent response to therapy. Therefore, there was sufficient data to conclude that APmCLN may be a reliable and practical new indicator for predicting response to therapy and prognosis in patients with pN1-PTC.

Several limitations were evident in the current study. First, there were only 355 patients enrolled and only five relapsed cases were reported in the relatively short follow-up period. Therefore, additional studies with longer follow-up times and multicenter data are needed. Second, APmCLN is currently a categorical variable. The 75% critical value is obtained through step classification and comparison between groups. If it is a continuous variable, the cut-off value can be calculated using an ROC curve (5254), which is more scientific. Given the differences in the color and cell morphology of H&E-stained sections between tumor and normal tissue, software, such as ImageJ and ITK-SNAP (5558), can be used to identify the boundary, obtain the location and range of metastases in the LN, and calculate the area proportion of the metastatic lesion. This more extensive analysis would allow APmCLN to be analyzed as a continuous variable. Third, according to the ATA guidelines (2015 version) (7), some patients with PTMC are recommend Active Surveillance rather than surgery. Active Surveillance is applying life-long diagnostic modalities to evaluate changes in disease status without treatment, until progression of the disease becomes clinically apparent (5961). Regular follow-up should be provided for the patient to ensure that disease progression is tolerable without any additional therapeutic options, such as surgery. However, due to the retrospective nature of the present study, most of the patients enrolled had undergone surgical treatment, which was inconsistent with the current ATA guidelines (7). The present patients were recruited between 2013 and 2015, and treated according to the 2009 ATA guidelines (6) and the Chinese Thyroid Association (62) in which thyroid surgery is recommended if the lesion is considered to be malignant.

In conclusion, APmCLN >75% was an indicator of tumor aggressiveness and a significant independent risk factor for non-excellent response to therapy in patients with pN1-PTC. These results may enable physicians to further stratify patients into various risk groups and develop effective individual follow-up and treatment plans.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by The Innovative Talent Support Program of Medicine and Health Technology project from the Zhejiang Health Commission (grant no. 2021RC078) and The General Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education (grant no. Y202043478).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

LHS and LeX designed the study and confirm the authenticity and legitimacy of all raw data. LHS wrote the manuscript. LZ, JW and LJ performed the data collection and analysis. LHS interpreted the results. YL performed the histological examination, and confirmed the diagnosis. LiX performed the follow-up plan and collected the data from patients. LeX supervised the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by The Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Hangzhou, China). All patients provided written informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Talamonti MS and Sturgeon C: Extent of surgery affects survival for papillary thyroid cancer. Ann Surg. 246:375–384. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Adam MA, Pura J, Gu L, Dinan MA, Tyler DS, Reed SD, Scheri R, Roman SA and Sosa JA: Extent of surgery for papillary thyroid cancer is not associated with survival: An analysis of 61,775 patients. Ann Surg. 260:601–607. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Barney BM, Hitchcock YJ, Sharma P, Shrieve DC and Tward JD: Overall and cause-specific survival for patients undergoing lobectomy, near-total, or total thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer. Head Neck. 33:645–649. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Gilliland FD, Hunt WC, Morris DM and Key CR: Prognostic factors for thyroid carcinoma. A population-based study of 15,698 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program 1973–1991. Cancer. 79:564–573. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Doll KM, Rademaker A and Sosa JA: Practical guide to surgical data sets: Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. JAMA Surg. 153:588–589. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, ; Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Pacini F, et al: Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 19:1167–1214. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, Pacini F, Randolph GW, Sawka AM, Schlumberger M, et al: 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 26:1–133. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Randolph GW, Duh QY, Heller KS, LiVolsi VA, Mandel SJ, Steward DL, Tufano RP and Tuttle RM; American Thyroid Association Surgical Affairs Committee's Taskforce on Thyroid Cancer Nodal Surgery, : The prognostic significance of nodal metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma can be stratified based on the size and number of metastatic lymph nodes, as well as the presence of extranodal extension. Thyroid. 22:1144–1152. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Roh JL, Park JY and Park CI: Total thyroidectomy plus neck dissection in differentiated papillary thyroid carcinoma patients: Pattern of nodal metastasis, morbidity, recurrence, and postoperative levels of serum parathyroid hormone. Ann Surg. 245:604–610. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Sivanandan R and Soo KC: Pattern of cervical lymph node metastases from papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Br J Surg. 88:1241–1244. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Cranshaw IM and Carnaille B: Micrometastases in thyroid cancer. An important finding? Surg Oncol. 17:253–258. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Raue F and Frank-Raue K: Thyroid cancer: Risk-stratified management and individualized therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 22:5012–5021. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Tuttle RM, Tala H, Shah J, Leboeuf R, Ghossein R, Gonen M, Brokhin M, Omry G, Fagin JA and Shaha A: Estimating risk of recurrence in differentiated thyroid cancer after total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine remnant ablation: Using response to therapy variables to modify the initial risk estimates predicted by the new American Thyroid Association staging system. Thyroid. 20:1341–1349. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Castagna MG, Maino F, Cipri C, Belardini V, Theodoropoulou A, Cevenini G and Pacini F: Delayed risk stratification, to include the response to initial treatment (surgery and radioiodine ablation), has better outcome predictivity in differentiated thyroid cancer patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 165:441–446. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Ruben R, Pavithran PV, Menon VU, Nair V and Kumar H: Performance of ATA risk stratification systems, response to therapy, and outcome in an indian cohort of differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients: A retrospective study. Eur Thyroid J. 8:312–318. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Tuttle RM and Alzahrani AS: Risk stratification in differentiated thyroid cancer: From detection to final follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 104:4087–4100. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Edge SB and Compton CC: The American Joint Committee on Cancer: The 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 17:1471–1474. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Bassotti G, Villanacci V, Salerni B, Maurer CA and Cathomas G: Beyond hematoxylin and eosin: The importance of immunohistochemical techniques for evaluating surgically resected constipated patients. Tech Coloproctol. 15:371–375. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kaczka K, Wojcik I, Matejkowska M, Kuzdak K and Pomorski L: Lymph node metastases of papillary thyroid cancer in immunohistochemical and molecular examination-preliminary report. Endokrynol Pol. 56:160–167. 2005.(In Polish). PubMed/NCBI

20 

Stavropoulos A, Varras M, Vasilakaki T, Varra VK, Tsavari A, Varra FN, Nonni A, Kavantzas N and Lazaris AC: Expression of p53 and PTEN in human primary endometrial carcinomas: Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis and study of their concomitant expression. Oncol Lett. 17:4575–4589. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Rho MH, Kim DW, Hong HP, Park YM, Kwon MJ, Jung SJ, Kim YW and Kang T: Diagnostic value of antithyroid peroxidase antibody for incidental autoimmune thyroiditis based on histopathologic results. Endocrine. 42:647–652. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Spencer CA: Clinical review: Clinical utility of thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) measurements for patients with differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 96:3615–3627. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Segurado OG, Volmer W and Dowell B: PSA standardization: A review of NCCLS, Stanford and Abbott efforts. Anticancer Res. 17:2919–2920. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Feldt-Rasmussen U and Rasmussen AK: Serum thyroglobulin (Tg) in presence of thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAb). Clinical and methodological relevance of the interaction between Tg and TgAb in vitro and in vivo. J Endocrinol Invest. 8:571–576. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Podnos YD, Smith D, Wagman LD and Ellenhorn JD: The implication of lymph node metastasis on survival in patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Am Surg. 71:731–734. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Brito JP, Al Nofal A, Montori VM, Hay ID and Morris JC: The impact of subclinical disease and mechanism of detection on the rise in thyroid cancer incidence: A population-based study in olmsted county, minnesota during 1935 through 2012. Thyroid. 25:999–1007. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Aschebrook-Kilfoy B, Schechter RB, Shih YC, Kaplan EL, Chiu BC, Angelos P and Grogan RH: The clinical and economic burden of a sustained increase in thyroid cancer incidence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 22:1252–1259. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Harrison MB, Graham ID, van den Hoek J, Dogherty EJ, Carley ME and Angus V: Guideline adaptation and implementation planning: A prospective observational study. Implement Sci. 8:492013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Silberstein EB, Alavi A, Balon HR, Clarke SE, Divgi C, Gelfand MJ, Goldsmith SJ, Jadvar H, Marcus CS, Martin WH, et al: The SNMMI practice guideline for therapy of thyroid disease with 131I 3.0. J Nucl Med. 53:1633–1651. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Baek SK, Jung KY, Kang SM, Kwon SY, Woo JS, Cho SH and Chung EJ: Clinical risk factors associated with cervical lymph node recurrence in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 20:147–152. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Ricarte-Filho J, Ganly I, Rivera M, Katabi N, Fu W, Shaha A, Tuttle RM, Fagin JA and Ghossein R: Papillary thyroid carcinomas with cervical lymph node metastases can be stratified into clinically relevant prognostic categories using oncogenic BRAF, the number of nodal metastases, and extra-nodal extension. Thyroid. 22:575–584. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Chen L, Zhu Y, Zheng K, Zhang H, Guo H, Zhang L, Wu K, Kong L, Ruan W, Hu J, et al: The presence of cancerous nodules in lymph nodes is a novel indicator of distant metastasis and poor survival in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 143:1035–1042. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Lee J, Lee SG, Kim K, Yim SH, Ryu H, Lee CR, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY and Jo YS: Clinical value of lymph node ratio integration with the 8th edition of the UICC TNM classification and 2015 ATA risk stratification systems for recurrence prediction in papillary thyroid cancer. Sci Rep. 9:133612019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Ryu IS, Song CI, Choi SH, Roh JL, Nam SY and Kim SY: Lymph node ratio of the central compartment is a significant predictor for locoregional recurrence after prophylactic central neck dissection in patients with thyroid papillary carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 21:277–283. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Boi F, Pani F, Calo PG, Lai ML and Mariotti S: High prevalence of papillary thyroid carcinoma in nodular Hashimoto's thyroiditis at the first diagnosis and during the follow-up. J Endocrinol Invest. 41:395–402. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Resende de Paiva C, Grønhøj C, Feldt-Rasmussen U and von Buchwald C: Association between Hashimoto's thyroiditis and thyroid cancer in 64,628 patients. Front Oncol. 7:532017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Dong S, Xie XJ, Xia Q and Wu YJ: Indicators of multifocality in papillary thyroid carcinoma concurrent with Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Am J Cancer Res. 9:1786–1795. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Borowczyk M, Janicki A, Dworacki G, Szczepanek-Parulska E, Danieluk M, Barnett J, Antonik M, Kałużna M, Bromińska B, Czepczyński R, et al: Decreased staging of differentiated thyroid cancer in patients with chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis. J Endocrinol Invest. 42:45–52. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Ieni A, Vita R, Magliolo E, Santarpia M, Di Bari F, Benvenga S and Tuccari G: One-third of an archivial series of papillary thyroid cancer (Years 2007–2015) Has coexistent chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, which is associated with a more favorable tumor-node-metastasis staging. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 8:3372017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Lun Y, Wu X, Xia Q, Han Y, Zhang X, Liu Z, Wang F, Duan Z, Xin S and Zhang J: Hashimoto's thyroiditis as a risk factor of papillary thyroid cancer may improve cancer prognosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 148:396–402. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Kim WG, Yoon JH, Kim WB, Kim TY, Kim EY, Kim JM, Ryu JS, Gong G, Hong SJ and Shong YK: Change of serum antithyroglobulin antibody levels is useful for prediction of clinical recurrence in thyroglobulin-negative patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 93:4683–4689. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Latrofa F, Ricci D, Montanelli L, Rocchi R, Piaggi P, Sisti E, Grasso L, Basolo F, Ugolini C, Pinchera A and Vitti P: Lymphocytic thyroiditis on histology correlates with serum thyroglobulin autoantibodies in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: Impact on detection of serum thyroglobulin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 97:2380–2387. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Spencer C and Fatemi S: Thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) methods-Strengths, pitfalls and clinical utility for monitoring TgAb-positive patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 27:701–712. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Jankovic B, Le KT and Hershman JM: Clinical Review: Hashimoto's thyroiditis and papillary thyroid carcinoma: Is there a correlation? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 98:474–482. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Fugazzola L, Colombo C, Perrino M and Muzza M: Papillary thyroid carcinoma and inflammation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2:882011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Shi L, Zhou L, Wang J, Li F and Xie L: Cytokine production of papillary thyroid carcinoma coexisting with Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 10:9567–9574. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

47 

Ito Y, Higashiyama T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K and Miyauchi A: Risk factors for recurrence to the lymph node in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients without preoperatively detectable lateral node metastasis: Validity of prophylactic modified radical neck dissection. World J Surg. 31:2085–2091. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Sugitani I, Kasai N, Fujimoto Y and Yanagisawa A: A novel classification system for patients with PTC: Addition of the new variables of large (3 cm or greater) nodal metastases and reclassification during the follow-up period. Surgery. 135:139–148. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Perrier ND, Brierley JD and Tuttle RM: Differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:55–63. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Jeon MJ, Yoon JH, Han JM, Yim JH, Hong SJ, Song DE, Ryu JS, Kim TY, Shong YK and Kim WB: The prognostic value of the metastatic lymph node ratio and maximal metastatic tumor size in pathological N1a papillary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Endocrinol. 168:219–225. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Lee SR, Kim HO, Son BH, Shin JH and Yoo CH: Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in patients with gastric cancer. World J Surg. 36:1096–1101. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Yu J, Yang L, Vexler A and Hutson AD: Easy and accurate variance estimation of the nonparametric estimator of the partial area under the ROC curve and its application. Stat Med. 35:2251–2282. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Sorribas A, March J and Trujillano J: A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 21:1213–1235. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Habibzadeh F, Habibzadeh P and Yadollahie M: On determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: The case of tests with continuous results. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 26:297–307. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Wang LW, Qu AP, Yuan JP, Chen C, Sun SR, Hu MB, Liu J and Li Y: Computer-based image studies on tumor nests mathematical features of breast cancer and their clinical prognostic value. PLoS One. 8:e823142013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Dello SA, van Dam RM, Slangen JJ, van de Poll MC, Bemelmans MH, Greve JW, Beets-Tan RG, Wigmore SJ and Dejong CH: Liver volumetry plug and play: Do it yourself with ImageJ. World J Surg. 31:2215–2221. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Zhou J, Zhang Y, Chang KT, Lee KE, Wang O, Li J, Lin Y, Pan Z, Chang P, Chow D, et al: Diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions on DCE-MRI by using radiomics and deep learning with consideration of peritumor tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging. 51:798–809. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Nie P, Yang G, Wang Z, Yan L, Miao W, Hao D, Wu J, Zhao Y, Gong A, Cui J, et al: A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from homogeneous clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 30:1274–1284. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Jeon MJ, Kim WG, Chung KW, Baek JH, Kim WB and Shong YK: Active surveillance of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Where do we stand? Eur Thyroid J. 8:298–306. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Donovan JL: Presenting treatment options to men with clinically localized prostate cancer: The acceptability of active surveillance/monitoring. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012:191–196. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Kim TY and Shong YK: Active surveillance of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: A Mini-review from Korea. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 32:399–406. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Ya M: Interpretation of the management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer (2012 Chinese edition). Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 27:917–920. 2013.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2021
Volume 21 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Shi L, Zhou L, Wang J, Jin L, Lei Y, Xia L and Xie L: The effect of the area proportion of the metastatic lesion within the central metastatic lymph node on response to therapy in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Oncol Lett 21: 284, 2021.
APA
Shi, L., Zhou, L., Wang, J., Jin, L., Lei, Y., Xia, L., & Xie, L. (2021). The effect of the area proportion of the metastatic lesion within the central metastatic lymph node on response to therapy in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Oncology Letters, 21, 284. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12545
MLA
Shi, L., Zhou, L., Wang, J., Jin, L., Lei, Y., Xia, L., Xie, L."The effect of the area proportion of the metastatic lesion within the central metastatic lymph node on response to therapy in papillary thyroid carcinoma". Oncology Letters 21.4 (2021): 284.
Chicago
Shi, L., Zhou, L., Wang, J., Jin, L., Lei, Y., Xia, L., Xie, L."The effect of the area proportion of the metastatic lesion within the central metastatic lymph node on response to therapy in papillary thyroid carcinoma". Oncology Letters 21, no. 4 (2021): 284. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12545