High expression of microRNA‑1266 in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with poor prognosis of patients and biological cell growth
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 3, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12608
- Article Number: 347
Abstract
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancer worldwide, with similar rates of incidence and mortality (1,2). As the third most common cause of cancer-related death, HCC leads to >60,000 deaths globally each year (3,4). The majority of patients with HCC are already in advanced stages when they are diagnosed, and the most effective treatment for early-stage patients is surgical resection (5). However, the long-term survival rate of patients with HCC is low, and the prognosis is poor due to the high rate of HCC recurrence and metastasis so resection is not available for most patients (6). Due to changes in lifestyle and environment, HCC is currently demonstrating a trend of continuously increasing global incidence that seriously affects quality of life (7). Numerous types of antitumor therapy, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy and adjuvant therapy have been used for HCC, however, there are few specific markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of HCC to date (8). It is important to identify effective targets for early detection, treatment, and prognostic monitoring of patients with HCC; hence, it is necessary to identify new biomarkers (9).
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a major class of small non-coding RNAs consisting of ~18–25 nucleotides that were originally identified in Caenorhabditis elegans and negatively regulate gene expression at the mRNA level (10–12). Numerous studies have revealed the important role of miRNAs in biological processes, such as cell proliferation and differentiation, embryogenesis, metabolism, organogenesis and apoptosis (12–14). Growing evidence indicates that miRNAs are altered in a number of diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, hepatitis and various types of cancer including prostate cancer and osteosarcoma due to genomic events, such as gene mutations or downregulation caused by enzymes that involved in miRNAs biogenesis (15–17). Previous studies have demonstrated that miR-29a, miR-21 and miR-221 and 222 are abnormally expressed in HCC (18–21). Shi et al (22) recently found that 29 miRNAs, including miR-1266, were upregulated in the tissues of patients with HCC. It can be concluded from previous studies that miR-1266 may serve an important role in the occurrence and development of HCC. However, the expression pattern, biological function and clinical significance of miR-1266 in the pathogenesis of HCC remain unclear.
The present study aimed to investigate the difference in miR-1266 expression between HCC and normal liver tissues and evaluated the clinical prognostic significance of miR-1266 in patients with HCC. In addition, the effects of miR-1266 on the proliferation, migration and invasion of HCC cell lines were also investigated. The present study aimed to provide a new biomarker for HCC.
Materials and methods
Patients and specimens
A total of 119 patients (median age, 60 years; age range, 26–77 years) with HCC admitted to Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University (Fuzhou, China) between January 2012 and December 2014 were included in this study. HCC tissue and normal adjacent tissues [all were confirmed by at least two pathologists of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University (Fuzhou, China)] 5 cm away from the cancer lesion were collected from each patient. The tissue samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen at −80°C until subsequent total RNA extraction experiments were performed. All patients underwent resection surgery and did not receive any treatment, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy before surgery. The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Patients with no complete follow-up data; ii) patients suffering from other types of cancer; and iii) patients with systemic intolerance to surgery. In order to collect the overall survival outcome information of patients with HCC, all of them were enrolled in the 5-year follow up investigation by telephone. The follow-up was performed at intervals of 3 months during the first 2 years, 6 months in years 2–4 and annually in the last year. The results of the follow up are listed in Table I. Each patient signed a written consent approving the use of their tissues for research purposes after the operation. The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University (approval no. 2012-032-01; Fuzhou, China).
Table I.Association between miR-1266 expression and clinical characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (n=119). |
Cell lines and transfection
In total 4 types of HCC cell lines (Hep3B, Huh-7, MHCC97 and SNU-387) and one normal human liver cell line MIHA were purchased from Shanghai Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. In Hep3B cells there are obvious granular endoplasmic reticulum pools and mitochondria; ring-shaped lamellar accumulation and glycogen aggregates are found in the cytoplasm, and α-fetoprotein (AFP) is positive (23). HuH-7 cells are flat polygonal in the early stage with fine particles in the cytoplasm, while later cells are elongated in the form of coarse particles (24). MHCC97 cells grow into dense colonies or single-layer flakes with a doubling time of about 31 h presenting a typical malignant epithelial morphology, and AFP is positive (25). The SNU-387 cell line demonstrates adherent cell growth and obvious nuclear convolution (26). The Hep3B, Huh-7 and MHCC97 cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), while the MIHA and SNU-387 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS. All cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.
Cells (2×105) were seeded into a 6-well plate before transfection. According to the manufacturer's instructions, miR-1266 mimic (5′-CCUCAGGGCUGUAGAACAGGGCU-3′), scrambled mimic negative control (mimic NC; 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′), miR-1266 inhibitor (5′-AGCCCUGUUCUACAGCCCUGAGG-3′) and scrambled inhibitor NC (5′-CAGUACUUUUGUGUAGUACAA-3′) (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd.) all at a final concentration of 50 nM were transfected into cells by using Lipofectamine® 2000 Reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in serum-free condition for 6 h at 37°C and then complete DMEM medium was added. Transfection efficiency was measured after 24 h of transfection at 37°C and then the transfected cells were used in subsequent experimentation. Untreated cells served as the blank control group.
RNA extraction and reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q) PCR analysis
Total RNA of tissues or cell lines was extracted using TRIzol® reagent (Takara Bio Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA was removed from the extracted total RNA by trypsin and then RNA concentration was detected by NanoDrop. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was obtained by reverse transcription from the extracted RNA using the cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) with incubation at 16°C for 30 min, then 42°C for 30 min and terminated at 85°C for 5 min. Relative expression of miR-1266 was assessed in cell lines and tissues using the SYBR Green I Real-Time PCR kit (Shanghai GenePharma Co. Ltd.) on an Applied Biosystems 7900 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) using the following thermocycling conditions: Preliminary denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, then 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 30 sec, followed by 72°C for 45 sec. The sequences used in RT-qPCR were as follows: miR-1266 forward, 5′-GCCGAGCCTCAGGGCTGTAGA-3′, reverse, 5′-CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGA-3′; U6 forward, 5′-GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT-3′ and reverse 5′-CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT-3′. U6 small nuclear RNA was used for normalization and relative quantification of miR-1266 expression was calculated by using the 2−ΔΔCq method (27). Each sample measurement was performed in triplicate.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation was assessed by using the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (CCK-8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. HCC Huh-7 and MHCC97H cells (1×103/well) were seeded into a 96-well culture plate at 7°C for 24 h after transfection. Then, the CCK-8 solution was added to each well for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h and incubated for 2 h. The absorbance was analyzed at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Each sample measurement was performed in triplicate at each time point.
Cell migration and invasion assay
Migration and cell invasion assays were performed using the Transwell chamber (BD Biosciences) with 8-µm pores. The cells were inoculated in serum-free DMEM medium after transfection. In the invasion assay, Matrigel (Becton-Dickinson and Company) was pre-coated on the bottom layer of the upper chamber at 37°C for 4 h, but Matrigel was not added in the upper chamber of the migration assay. Huh-7 and MHCC97H cell suspension (5×104 cells/well) was added into the upper chamber and 600–800 µl of medium containing 10% FBS as a chemokine was added into the lower chamber. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C, the bottom membrane of the upper chamber was fixed in methanol for 30 min at room temperature, and then stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 15 min at room temperature. After air-drying, the stained cells were mounted with neutral resin and counted under a light microscope.
Luciferase reporter assay
First, it was predicted that DAB2 Interacting Protein (DAB2IP) may be the target gene of miR-1266 through TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_71/). The wild-type (WT) and mutant (MUT) promoters of DAB2IP were constructed by Shanghai GenePharma Co. Ltd. and inserted into the pGL3 basic vector (Promega Corporation). The DAB2IP 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) sequence was amplified from normal human genomic DNA and subcloned into the pmirGLO luciferase reporter vector (Promega Corporation). MHCC97 cells were cultured in a 24-well plate, and after 24 h of culture, they were co-transfected with WT or MUT 3′-UTR vector and miR-1266 mimic, 5′-CCUCAGGGCUGUAGAACAGGGCU-3′; mimic NC, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′; miR-1266 inhibitor, 5′-AGCCCUGUUCUACAGCCCUGAGG-3′ or inhibitor NC, 5′-CAGUACUUUUGUGUAGUACAA-3′ using Lipofectamine® 2000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Following 24 h of transfection, luciferase activity was measured by the dual luciferase reporter gene assay system (Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The relative luciferase activity was estimated by normalizing the luciferase activity to the Renilla luciferase activity. All assays were repeated three times.
Statistical analysis
All biological experiments were repeated at least 3 times and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corp.) and GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc.). By using mean value of miR-1266 expression (0.8732) as the cut-off value, patients were divided into high miR-1266 expression group and low miR-1266 expression group. χ2 test was used for assessing the association between miR-1266 expression and clinical features of patients. The difference between two groups were analyzed using paired Student's t-test. Multiple comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey's test. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to test the overall survival rate of patients, and the prognostic significance of miR-1266 was evaluated by Cox regression analysis. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Expression of miR-1266 in HCC tissues and cell lines
Firstly, the expression of miR-1266 in 119 pairs of HCC tissues and adjacent normal liver tissues was assessed. The results indicated that the miR-1266 expression level was significantly higher in the HCC tissues compared with the adjacent normal tissues (P<0.001; Fig. 1A). In addition, further analysis of miR-1266 expression in HCC cell lines (Hep3B, Huh-7, MHCC97 and SNU-387) was performed. The expression of miR-1266 in the HCC cell lines was significantly higher compared with that of the normal cell line MHA (P<0.001; Fig. 1B). In addition, the highest expression of miR-1266 in the HCC cell lines was in the MHCC97 cell line followed by the Huh-7 cell line (Fig. 1B). Hence, these 2 cell lines were selected for subsequent experimentation due to their high miR-1266 expression.
miR-1266 expression is associated with the clinicopathological features of patients with HCC
As shown in Table I, the association between miR-1266 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with HCC was assessed. The patients were divided into the miR-1266 low expression group (n=57) and the miR-1266 high expression group (n=62) with the mean value of miR-1266 expression as the cut-off value. The results demonstrated that high mRNA expression of miR-1266 was significantly associated with Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage (28) (P=0.014; Table I). There was no significant association observed for the other characteristics, such as age, sex, hepatitis B virus infection, tumor size, AFP and cirrhosis (P>0.05; Table I).
High expression of miR-1266 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with HCC
To assess the potential prognostic value of using miR-1266 as a biomarker in HCC tissues, a cumulative survival curve was generated using the Kaplan-Meier method according to the patients' miR-1266 expression and overall survival information. The results demonstrated that, when compared with patients with lower miR-1266 expression levels, the 5-year survival rate of patients with HCC with higher miR-1266 expression levels was significantly lower (log-rank test P=0.015; Fig. 2). In the multivariate Cox hazard regression model, further multivariate analysis of the association between miR-1266 expression levels and overall survival of patients with HCC was performed. The results demonstrated that the miR-1266 expression level [hazard ratio (HR)=2.048; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.151–3.664; P=0.015; Table II) and TNM stage (HR=1.900; 95% CI=1.074–3.364; P=0.028; Table II) were independent prognostic factors for the 5-year overall survival of patients with HCC.
Table II.Multivariate Cox regression analysis for risk prognostic factors to the overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. |
Overexpression of miR-1266 promotes HCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion
To investigate whether miR-1266 regulates HCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion, in vitro HCC cell experiments were performed by transfecting miR-1266 mimics or miR-1266 inhibitor into MHCC97 and Huh7 cells. The effect of miR-1266 on the aforementioned cellular behavior was also measured in MIHA cells, which acted as a control for comparison with HCC cell lines. MHCC97 and Huh7 cells with significantly increased expression of miR-1266 (P<0.001) and MHCC97 and Huh7 cells with inhibited expression of miR-1266 were obtained through cell transfection, compared with untreated cells (P<0.01; Fig. 3A). The CCK-8 cell proliferation assay demonstrated that overexpression of miR-1266 by miR-1266 mimics in cells increased Transwell assays indicated that the migration and invasion of MHCC97 and Huh7 cells were significantly increased due to the overexpression of miR-1266 (P<0.001), while the downregulation of miR-1266 led to a significant decrease in the migration and invasion of MHCC97 (P<0.001) and Huh7 (P<0.01) cells (Fig. 4A and B), however, no effect was observed in normal MIHA cell line (Fig. 4A and B). It can be seen from the images of MIHA, MHCC97 and Huh7 cells in Fig. S1A and B that the invasion and migration trends were consistent with those in Fig. 4A and B.
DAB2IP may be a direct target of miR-1266
Luciferase reporter assay was performed using MHCCH97 cells due to its superior cellular activities (proliferative, migratory, and invasive abilities) compared with Huh-7 cells. Based on the TargetScan database, position 996–1003 of DAB2IP mRNA 3′UTR was discovered to have binding sites of miR-1266 (Fig. 5A). Luciferase reporter gene detection was used to verify the effect of miR-1266 on DAB2IP in MHCCH97 cell because of its better cellular activities. miR-1266 mimics significantly reduced the relative luciferase activities of cells with wild miR-1266-binding site (P<0.001; Fig. 5B) and miR-1266 inhibitors significantly increased its relative luciferase activities (P<0.01; Fig. 5B). However, neither miR-1266 mimics nor inhibitors caused significant changes in cells with mutated vectors (Fig. 5B). The aforementioned results demonstrated that miR-1266 can directly target DAB2IP expression.
Discussion
HCC is a disease that is common worldwide (29). The majority of patients find that the disease is already advanced upon diagnosis, and its prognosis is poor (30,31). It is necessary to discover new and effective biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of HCC, which will help to improve the clinical efficacy of treatments in patients (32,33). As a new type of biomarker, miRNAs serve an important role in the occurrence, development and metastasis of numerous types of cancer, such as HCC and prostate cancer (34,35). Accumulating studies have investigated the association between cancer and miRNAs, and it has been proven that various cancers exhibit abnormal expression of miRNAs (36–38). For example, the low expression of miR-129 is significantly associated with the poor prognosis of prostate cancer, and can be regarded as a new molecular target for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (39). Wang et al (40) discovered that the expression of miR-339-5p is significantly reduced in HCC patients tissues compared with non-cancerous liver tissues, and is closely related to the invasion of HCC cells indicating that the expression of miR-339-5p is an independent prognostic factor in patients with HCC. Several studies have proven that the abnormal expression of miR-1266 serves an important role in various diseases and cancers, such as papillary thyroid carcinoma and prostate cancer (41–44).
miRNAs have been proven to be oncogenes in various cancers (45). Wang et al (44) confirmed that miR-1266 demonstrated a highly upregulated trend in the tissues and serum of patients with cervical cancer compared with the controls. The aforementioned study is consistent with the findings of the present study. In the present study, the expression of miR-1266 in HCC tissues and cell lines was examined, and its potential role in HCC was investigated in relation to the pathological characteristics of patients. The results demonstrated that the expression of miR-1266 was significantly increased in HCC tissues and cell lines compared with non-cancerous tissue and a normal cell line. In addition, in the present study high expression of miR-1266 demonstrated a significant association with TNM stage, which was consistent with other studies (44,46). Lu et al (47) analyzed the miRNA expression profile of patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas database and concluded that miR-1266 is upregulated in HCC. The aforementioned results indicate that miR-1266 is an oncogene of HCC and is involved in the occurrence, development and metastasis of HCC.
In addition, the present study examined the relationship between miR-1266 expression and the survival of patients with HCC using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. The present study found that high expression levels of miR-1266 reduced the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with HCC. In addition, it was found that the expression level of miR-1266 was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year overall survival. These results indicated that miR-1266 may be an important prognostic biomarker for HCC. Sevinc et al (42) proved that miR-1266 is associated with the recurrence and metastasis of estrogen receptor positive patients with breast cancer. Wang et al (44) revealed that the overall survival rate of patients with cervical cancer with high expression of miR-1266 was significantly lower compared with patients with low expression of miR-1266. These studies indicated that miR-1266 may be used as a new molecular target for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. However, a previous study did not find a significant association between miR-1266 expression and the clinical prognosis of HCC (47). This may be because the previous study (47) selected patients from TCGA database and the patients came from different hospitals in various cities and the time span was large, which may lead to inconsistent criteria for determining patient information.
In addition, the present study investigated the effects of miR-1266 on the proliferation, migration and invasion of HCC cells using CCK-8 assays and Transwell assays, respectively. The results demonstrated that miR-1266 significantly increased the cell proliferation, migration and invasion ability of HCC cell lines, while inhibitors of miR-1266 inhibited their proliferation, migration and invasion. These results indicate that miR-1266 is involved in the molecular biological changes of HCC cells. Fu et al demonstrated that the upregulated expression of miR-1266 significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of papillary thyroid carcinoma cells (41). Sun et al (43) revealed that overexpression of miR-1266 significantly attenuated the proliferation, migration and invasion of prostate cancer cell lines. Chen et al (48) confirmed that miR-1266 affected the proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer cells by targeting telomerase reverse transcriptase. These studies indicated that miR-1266 may participate in the occurrence and development of different diseases by affecting proliferation, migration and invasion, which is consistent with the findings of the present study.
Wang et al (44) proved that miR-1266 promoted proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting DAB2IP in HeLa and SiHa cells. Hence, the present study sought to investigate the interaction between miR-1266 and DAB2IP. The results revealed that the overexpression of miR-1266 directly targeted downregulation of DAB2IP. From the results of the present study it can be concluded that DAB2IP is a target gene of miR-1266 expressed in HCC tissues and cells. Previous studies have found that DAB2IP can be used as a target gene for regulating HCC. Liu et al (49) found that miR-328-5p decreased its expression by targeting DAB2IPmRNA and promoted the development of HCC. Chen et al (50) proved that there was a direct interaction between miR-1307-3p and the 3′UTR of DAB2IP, and miR-1307-3p served a driving role in the process of HCC by targeting DAB2IP. The results of the present study indicate that DAB2IP may be a target gene for miR-1266 serving a role in HCC cells. This speculation needs further investigation in future studies.
The lack of in vivo experiments was a limitation in the present study. The current study is relatively microscopic, and the lack of in vivo assays makes it impossible to observe the effects of miR-1266 expression on tumor growth and invasion from a macroscopic perspective. In future studies, in vivo assays should be performed in order to verify the findings of the present study and further investigate the role and mechanism of miR-1266 expression in vivo.
In conclusion, the results of the present study indicated that the expression of miR-1266 was significantly increased in patients with HCC and is associated with poor prognosis in patients, and promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of HCC cells. The findings of the present study indicated that miR-1266 may be used as a biomarker for the prognosis of HCC.
Supplementary Material
Supporting Data
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was supported by the Science Foundation of Fujian province (grant no. 2017J05144).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
XH, YL, NY, YC, XY, ZC, YT, YH and JZ designed the study and performed the experiments. XH, YL and NY carried out the literature search, data acquisition, and data analysis. YC, XY, ZC and YT provided assistance for data acquisition, data analysis and manuscript editing. XH, YL, NY, YC, and XY drafted the manuscript. YH and JZ revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University (approval no. 2012-032-01; Fuzhou, China). All patients signed a written consent approving the use of their tissues for research purposes after the operation.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Forner A, Llovet JM and Bruix J: Hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 10:339–351. 2006. | |
Heinrich B, Czauderna C and Marquardt JU: Immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Res Treat. 41:292–297. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Etik DO, Suna N and Boyacioglu AS: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: Prevention, surveillance, diagnosis, and staging. Exp Clin Transplant. 31–35. 2017. | |
Intaraprasong P, Siramolpiwat S and Vilaichone RK: Advances in management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 17:3697–3703. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Sherman M: Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 359:2045–2047. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Poon RTP: Differentiating early and late recurrences after resection of HCC in Cirrhotic Patients: Implications on Surveillance, prevention, and treatment strategies. Ann Surg Oncol. 16:792–794. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cabrera R and Nelson DR: Review article: The management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 31:461–476. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Forner A, Da Fonseca LG, Diaz-Gonzalez A, Sanduzzi-Zamparelli M, Reig M and Bruix J: Controversies in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. JHEP Rep. 1:17–29. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De Stefano F, Chacon E, Turcios L, Marti F and Gedaly R: Novel biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis. 50:1115–1123. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Awasthi R, Rathbone MJ, Hansbro PM, Bebawy M and Dua K: Therapeutic prospects of microRNAs in cancer treatment through nanotechnology. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 8:97–100. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mohr AM and Mott JL: Overview of microRNA biology. Semin Liver Dis. 35:3–11. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Saliminejad K, Khorram Khorshid HR, Soleymani Fard S and Ghaffari SH: An overview of microRNAs: Biology, functions, therapeutics, and analysis methods. J Cell Physiol. 234:5451–5465. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vienberg S, Geiger J, Madsen S and Dalgaard LT: MicroRNAs in metabolism. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 219:346–361. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cai Z, Zhang F, Chen W, Zhang J and Li H: miRNAs: A promising target in the chemoresistance of bladder cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 12:11805–11816. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Aghdam SG, Ebrazeh M, Hemmatzadeh M, Seyfizadeh N, Shabgah AG, Azizi G, Ebrahimi N, Babaie F and Mohammadi H: The role of microRNAs in prostate cancer migration, invasion, and metastasis. J Cell Physiol. 234:9927–9942. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schulte C, Karakas M and Zeller T: microRNAs in cardiovascular disease-clinical application. Clin Chem Lab Med. 55:687–704. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li C, Xu B, Miu X, Deng Z, Liao H and Hao L: Inhibition of miRNA-21 attenuates the proliferation and metastasis of human osteosarcoma by upregulating PTEN. Exp Ther Med. 15:1036–1040. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Garofalo M, Di Leva G, Romano G, Nuovo G, Suh SS, Ngankeu A, Taccioli C, Pichiorri F, Alder H, Secchiero P, et al: miR-221&222 regulate TRAIL resistance and enhance tumorigenicity through PTEN and TIMP3 downregulation. Cancer Cell. 16:498–509. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kong G, Zhang J, Zhang S, Shan C, Ye L and Zhang X: Upregulated microRNA-29a by Hepatitis B Virus X protein enhances hepatoma cell migration by targeting PTEN in cell culture model. PLoS One. 6:e195182011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Meng F, Henson R, Wehbe-Janek H, Ghoshal K, Jacob ST and Patel T: MicroRNA-21 regulates expression of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in human hepatocellular cancer. Gastroenterology. 133:647–658. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen F, Li XF, Fu DS, Huang JG and Yang SE: Clinical potential of miRNA-221 as a novel prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Biomark. 18:209–214. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shi B, Zhang X, Chao L, Zheng Y, Tan Y, Wang L and Zhang W: Comprehensive analysis of key genes, microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma. FEBS Open Bio. 8:1424–1436. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Aden DP, Fogel A, Plotkin S, Damjanov I and Knowles BB: Controlled synthesis of HBsAg in a differentiated human liver carcinoma-derived cell line. Nature. 282:615–616. 1979. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakabayashi H, Taketa K, Yamane T, Miyazaki M, Miyano K and Sato J: Phenotypical stability of a human hepatoma cell line, HuH-7, in long-term culture with chemically defined medium. Gan. 75:151–158. 1984.PubMed/NCBI | |
Tian J, Tang ZY, Ye SL, Liu YK, Lin ZY, Chen J and Xue Q: New human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line with highly metastatic potential (MHCC97) and its expressions of the factors associated with metastasis. Br J Cancer. 81:814–821. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park JG, Lee JH, Kang MS, Park KJ, Jeon YM, Lee HJ, Kwon HS, Park HS, Yeo KS, Lee KU, et al: Characterization of cell lines established from human hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 62:276–282. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cheng CH, Lee CF, Wu TH, Chan KM, Chou HS, Wu TJ, Yu MC, Chen TC, Lee WC and Chen MF: Evaluation of the new AJCC staging system for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 9:1142011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zachau L, Zeckey C, Schlue J, Sander J, Meyer-Heithuis C, Winkler M, Klempnauer J and Schrem H: Haematogenous abdominal wall metastasis of differentiated, alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma after previous antiandrogen therapy within a site of lipoma manifestation since childhood. World J Surg Oncol. 10:982012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Poon RT and Fan ST: Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Patient selection and postoperative outcome. Liver Transpl. 10 (2 Suppl 1):S39–S45. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Su CW, Lei HJ, Chau GY, Hung HH, Wu JC, Hsia CY, Lui WY, Su YH, Wu CW and Lee SD: The effect of age on the long-term prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after resection surgery: A propensity score matching analysis. Arch Surg. 147:137–144. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu RH, Wei W, Krawczyk M, Wang W, Luo H, Flagg K, Yi S, Shi W, Quan Q, Li K, et al: Circulating tumour DNA methylation markers for diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Mater. 16:1155–1161. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sohn W, Kim J, Kang SH, Yang SR, Cho JY, Cho HC, Shim SG and Paik YH: Serum exosomal microRNAs as novel biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Mol Med. 47:e1842015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ostadrahimi S, Fayaz S, Parvizhamidi M, Abedi-Valugerdi M, Hassan M, Kadivar M, Teimoori-Toolabi L, Asgari M, Shahrokh H, Abolhasani M, et al: Downregulation of miR-1266-5P, miR-185-5P and miR-30c-2 in prostatic cancer tissue and cell lines. Oncol Lett. 15:8157–8164. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Cañueto J, Cardeñoso-Álvarez E, García-Hernández JL, Galindo-Villardón P, Vicente-Galindo P, Vicente-Villardón JL, Alonso-López D, De Las Rivas J, Valero J, Moyano-Sanz E, et al: MicroRNA (miR)-203 and miR-205 expression patterns identify subgroups of prognosis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 177:168–178. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Sun S, Liu Z, Zhang Y and Jiao S: Overexpression of MicroRNA-221 is associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 37:10155–10160. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Galardi S, Mercatelli N, Giorda E, Massalini S, Frajese GV, Ciafrè SA and Farace MG: miR-221 and miR-222 expression affects the proliferation potential of human prostate carcinoma cell lines by targeting p27Kip1. J Biol Chem. 282:23716–23724. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu S, Yi XM, Zhang ZY, Ge JP and Zhou WQ: miR-129 predicts prognosis and inhibits cell growth in human prostate carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 14:5025–5032. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang YL, Chen CM, Wang XM and Wang L: Effects of miR-339-5p on invasion and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 40:51–56. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fu YT, Zheng HB, Zhang DQ, Zhou L and Sun H: MicroRNA-1266 suppresses papillary thyroid carcinoma cell metastasis and growth via targeting FGFR2. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 22:3430–3438. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Sevinc ED, Egeli U, Cecener G, Tezcan G, Tunca B, Gokgoz S, Tasdelen I, Tolunay S and Evrensel T: Association of miR-1266 with recurrence/metastasis potential in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 16:291–297. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun CM, Zhang GM, Qian HN, Cheng SJ, Wang M, Liu M and Li D: MiR-1266 suppresses the growth and metastasis of prostate cancer via targeting PRMT5. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 23:6436–6444. 2019.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang J, Liu Y, Wang X, Li J, Wei J, Wang Y, Song W and Zhang Z: MiR-1266 promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion in cervical cancer by targeting DAB2IP. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 1864:3623–3630. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tutar Y: miRNA and cancer; computational and experimental approaches. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 15:4292014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang X, Ren D, Wu X, Lin X, Ye L, Lin C, Wu S, Zhu J, Peng X and Song L: miR-1266 contributes to pancreatic cancer progression and chemoresistance by the STAT3 and NF-κB signaling pathways. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 11:142–158. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lu M, Kong X, Wang H, Huang G, Ye C and He Z: A novel microRNAs expression signature for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and prognosis. Oncotarget. 8:8775–8784. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen L, Lü MH, Zhang D, Hao NB, Fan YH, Wu YY, Wang SM, Xie R, Fang DC, Zhang H, et al: miR-1207-5p and miR-1266 suppress gastric cancer growth and invasion by targeting telomerase reverse transcriptase. Cell Death Dis. 5:e10342014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Z, Yu Y, Huang Z, Kong Y, Hu X, Xiao W, Quan J and Fan X: CircRNA-5692 inhibits the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by sponging miR-328-5p to enhance DAB2IP expression. Cell Death Dis. 10:9002019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen S, Wang L, Yao B, Liu Q and Guo C: miR-1307-3p promotes tumor growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by repressing DAB2 interacting protein. Biomed Pharmacother. 117:1090552019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |