MicroRNA‑126 expression in the peripheral white blood cells of patients with breast and ovarian cancer is a potential biomarker for the early prediction of cancer risk in the carriers of methylated BRCA1
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 22, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2022.13396
- Article Number: 276
-
Copyright: © Al-Showimi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Distant metastases of cancer are responsible for most cancer-associated deaths. Breast cancer (BC), which is the most common cancer type in women worldwide, has enormous socio-economic and public health impacts. The progression of BC occurs through a series of gradually abnormal stages, beginning with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which, if untreated, might progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (1). IDC, the most common form of BC (2), is a histologically heterogeneous group of breast lesions with the potential for progression to metastatic BC (3).
Ovarian cancer (OC) is less common than BC but, due to the absence of signs or symptoms associated with early-stage disease, it is responsible for more deaths than other cancer types in women. High-grade serous OC (HGSOCs), which account for 68% of OC cases, are aggressive neoplasms commonly diagnosed at an advanced stage and have the worst prognosis (4). Complications associated with OC progression that have an ultimate fatal outcome occur in ~75% of patients despite good initial responses to chemotherapy (5).
BC type 1 gene (BRCA1) is a DNA repair and cancer suppressor gene that plays an essential role in maintaining genome integrity (6). Cells lacking BRCA1 protein are inclined to repair DNA damage by an error-prone mechanism resulting in gross chromosomal rearrangements and the generation of mutations that lead to carcinogenesis (7). Thus, female carriers of germline BRCA1 pathogenic mutations are at an increased risk of developing aggressive BC and OC at an early age. The inactivation of BRCA1 by epigenetic alteration is an alternative mechanism during sporadic BC and OC carcinogenesis (8,9). BC tumors, harboring hypermethylated BRCA1 promoter, display pathological features similar to BRCA1-mutated hereditary BC (8,10). Both types of tumors occur at an early age and are associated with the triple-negative (TNG) BC subtype (11,12). Moreover, the methylated BRCA1 promoter occurs in all histological types of epithelial OC, including serous, endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas (8,13,14).
In 2008, Snell et al (15) made a breakthrough, finding that methylated BRCA1 promoter is observed in peripheral white blood cells (WBC) of patients with mutation-negative familial BC and cancer-free controls. Since then, several studies have shown the association of WBC BRCA1 promoter methylation with the risk of developing early onset BC and high-grade serous OC, with pathological features similar to those of patients with germline mutated BRCA1 (15–24). The detection of BRCA1 promoter methylation in the WBCs of cancer-free (CF) females has raised the question of whether those individuals are at risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer (15,16,20,21,24,25). Our previous study demonstrated a strong association between BRCA1 promoter methylation and cancer-associated molecular changes in WBCs of CF BRCA1 methylation carriers (21). However, further studies are still needed to confirm the cancer risk of those individuals.
MicroRNA (miRNA/miR) is a type of cancer-associated molecule that regulates various cellular mechanisms, such as proliferation, differentiation and oncogenesis (26). These miRNAs are small 18–22 base-pair non-coding RNA molecules that play a crucial role in regulating gene expression by binding to the 3′-untranslated region of mRNA of the target gene. Long-lasting exposure to carcinogens results in miRNA alterations that activate carcinogenic mechanisms (27). The activated carcinogenic process, such as chromosome deletion and silencing of miRNA host genes, results in the irreversible loss of miRNA. Thus, miRNAs are a sensitive tool in detecting carcinogenic exposure and the pathological consequences induced by that exposure (27). Amongst the identified miRNAs is miR-126. The expression of miR-126 is increased as a defense mechanism to asbestos exposure. The subsequent loss of miR-126, due to the accumulation of DNA damage and chromosome deletion, leads to malignant mesothelioma (27).
miR-126 is one of several miRNAs that play critical roles in several human cancer types. miR-126 is located within the 7th intron of the epidermal growth factor-like protein 7 gene, and acts as a suppressor of metastasis in several cancer types. Loss of miR-126 expression in tumor tissue is associated with poor distal metastasis-free survival, and restoration of miR-126 reduces overall tumor growth and proliferation (28). Studies have shown that miR-126 differentiates malignant BC from benign BC (29,30). The patients with DCIS BC have a lower level of tissue and circulating miR-126 compared with normal adjacent tissue and healthy controls, respectively (31). Furthermore, downregulation of miR-126 is associated with aggressive OC with a poor prognosis (32,33). However, another study has observed upregulation of miR-126 in OC (34).
In contrast to the use of plasma miRNA, few studies have evaluated the use of miRNA in peripheral blood WBCs as a biomarker of cancer risk. In the present study, miR-126 in WBCs and plasma is investigated as a potential biomarker for the early prediction of BC and OC in CF BRCA1-methylated female carriers.
Materials and methods
Patient population
Fresh blood samples (10 ml) were collected from 502 patients with BC and 187 patients with OC who visited the Department of Oncology in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) between November 2017 and November 2021. The age of the patients ranged from 20–83 years (median, 48 years) for BC and 18–88 years (median, 53 years) for OC. Age, histological grade, estrogen receptor status and progesterone receptor status were provided by the Department of Pathology. For the CF female group, 10 ml fresh blood was collected from 425 CF female volunteers with an age range from 15–50 years. For newborn females, 20 leftover WBC RNA samples from our previous study (24) were used. Ethical approval (approval no. RAC #2170017) was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre. All participants provided written informed consent. The guardian of the volunteers provided written informed consent for participants <18 years old.
DNA and RNA isolation from WBC
Each fresh blood sample was collected in two BD Vacutainer EDTA (Becton, Dickinson and Company) blood collection tubes. The tubes were centrifuged immediately at 4°C for 10 min at 1,962 × g. The supernatants were frozen at −80°C in Eppendorf tubes for subsequent circulating RNA extraction using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen GmbH). The WBC layers were collected and transferred into two 2-ml Eppendorf tubes. One tube contained 900 ml RBC lysis solution for subsequent DNA extraction, and the other tube contained 1.2 ml RNALater solution for subsequent RNA extraction using the Gentra Puregene Blood Kit and RiboPure Blood Kit (Ambion; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), respectively (24).
Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Next, 2 µg WBC DNA was treated with sodium bisulfate and purified using the EpiTect Bisulfite kit (Qiagen GmbH) following the manufacturer's recommendations. The treated DNA was amplified using BRCA1 PCR primers that distinguish between methylated and unmethylated DNA (Table I) (8). The PCR conditions used were an initial cycle at 95°C for 1 min, then 40 cycles of 65°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 30 sec and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. All reactions were repeated at least twice.
Stem-loop PCR assay
Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for miR-126 was performed using a stem-loop RT primer and TaqMan miRNA RT kit (catalog no. 4427975; Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) following the manufacturer's protocol (Table I) and using the thermocycling conditions stated below. The small nuclear RNA U6 (U6; assay ID: 001973) was used for normalization, and all primers are stated in Table I. The expression level was calculated based on the threshold cycle value using the 2−ΔΔCq method (35). The fold-change of miR-126 expression in patients and carriers was performed relative to controls.
RT-qPCR
cDNA was synthesized from WBC RNA using Superscript III, reverse transcriptase and random hexamers (High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit; cat. no. 4368814; Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). qPCR using specific primers for the BRCA1 transcript (Table I) was performed as described previously (24). β-actin was used as a housekeeping gene, and the primers for this and BRCA1 are stated in Table I. PCR was performed using the CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) with SYBR Green (RT2 SYBR Green Fluor qPCR Mastermix; cat. no. 330513; Qiagen GmbH). The qPCR thermocycling conditions were an initial cycle at 95°C for 30 sec, followed by 44 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 30 sec. The 2−ΔΔCq method was used to calculate the relative BRCA1 expression. The fold-changes of mRNA expression were assessed relative to the unmethylated CF females, for patients with BC and OC, and CF female carriers.
Statistical analysis
Fisher's exact test was performed to determine the associations between BRCA1 promoter methylation and age, miR-126 expression and clinicopathological features of BC and OC. The unpaired t-test was performed to determine the statistical significance between two groups for gene expression (adult CF carriers vs. controls and newborns carriers vs. newborn controls). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparison tests were performed for comparing multiple groups. GraphPad version 9.1.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) was used for all analyses. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
WBC BRCA1 promoter methylation
Among the 502 patients with BC, 284 were aged <50 years and 218 were aged ≥50 years. There were 57 patients with methylated BRCA1 in their WBCs, of which 45 were aged <50 years (15.8%) and 12 were aged ≥50 years (5.5%). There was a significant association between BRCA1 methylation and the early onset of BC according to Fisher's exact test (P=0.0003; Table II). The clinicopathological characteristics of the screened patients with BC are shown in Table III. For the BRCA1 methylation–positive patients, the clinicopathological parameters, other than age, were known for only 49 cases. Notably, 34.7% (17/49) of the methylated cases were TNG BC, compared to 17.4% (63/363) of unmethylated cases. There was a significant association between WBC BRCA1 methylation and TNG BC according to Fisher's exact test (P=0.0066; Table III).
 | Table II.Association between BC type 1 gene promoter methylation in the white blood cells of patients with OC or early onset BC. |
Among the 187 patients with OC, 70 were aged <50 years and 117 were aged ≥50 years. There were 30 patients with OC (16%) who tested positive for BRCA1 methylation in their WBCs, with a significant association between WBC BRCA1 methylation and the incidence of ovarian cancer according to Fisher's exact test (P=0.0266; Table II). However, unlike BC, there was no association between BRCA1 methylation status and the onset of OC [20.0% aged <50 years (14/70) and 13.7% aged ≥50 years (16/117); P=0.3000]. The clinicopathological characteristics of the screened patients with OC are shown in Table IV. Most OC cases were of the serous OC subtype. Notably, 2 patients were positive for both BC and OC (Table IV).
In addition, among the 425 CF females who were screened, 9.4% (40/425) tested positive for the methylated BRCA1 promoter (Table II).
miR-126 in WBCs of patients with BC
miR-126 was measured in 74 randomly selected patients with BC (age range, 29–82 years; median age, 47 years), of which 32 patients were positive for methylated BRCA1 (median age, 44 years) (Table V). Based on a cut-off value of +3-fold relative to 17 age-matched female controls, there were 26 patients (35.1%) who had higher miR-126 expression, up to 18-fold, compared with the control (HBC group), and 48 patients (64.9%) who had unchanged miR-126 expression (UBC group) (Fig. 1A). The clinicopathological features, which were known for only 72 patients, showed that in the HBC group only 1 patient (3.8%) had distant metastasis compared to 11 patients (24%) in the UBC group. There was a significant negative association between miR-126 expression in WBC and the risk of distant BC metastasis according to Fisher's exact test (P=0.0452) (Table V). When the 32 patients with BRCA1-methylated BC were separately analyzed, similar results were observed where 9 patients (28%) had higher miR-126 expression, up to 13-fold, compared with the control (HBC group), and 23 patients (71.9%) had unchanged miR-126 expression (UBC group) (Fig. 1B). However, the negative association between miR-126 expression and the risk of distant BC metastasis was not statistically significant according to Fisher's exact test (P=0.3742) (Table VI).
| Table VI.MicroRNA-126 expression in the white blood cells of patients with BC type 1 gene methylated BC (n=32). |
mRNA in WBCs of patients with BC
When BRCA1 mRNA was measured in the WBCs of the patients with BRCA1-methylated BC, expression was significantly higher in the HBC group by up to 4-fold compared with the control group (P=0.0039). However, the UBC group did not significantly differ from the control group (P=0.4400) (Fig. 1C).
Circulating miR-126 in patients with BC
When miR-126 expression was measured in the plasma of patients with BC, there was less circulating miR-126 in the HBC (P=0.0260) and UBC (P=0.0160) groups compared with that in age-matched controls (Fig. 1D).
miR-126 in WBCs of patients with OC
miR-126 expression in WBCs was measured in 46 randomly selected patients with OC (age range, 19–88 years; median age, 51.5 years), of which 21 were positive for methylated BRCA1 (median age, 50 years) (Table VII). Similar to patients with BC, based on a cut-off value of +3-fold relative to 17 age-matched female controls, there were 11 patients (23.9%) who had higher miR-126 expression (HOC group), up to 7-fold, compared with the control, and 35 patients (76.1%) who had unchanged ImiR-126 expression (UOC group) (Fig. 2A; Table VII). In the HOC group, 8 patients (72.7%) had disease progression and 6 (54.5%) died, compared with the UOC group, where 10 patients (28.6%) had disease progression and 3 (8.57%) died. There was a significant positive association between the miR-126 expression in WBCs and the risk of OC disease progression and death according to Fisher's exact test (P=0.0029) (Table VII).
When the 21 patients with BRCA1-methylated OC were analyzed separately, similar results were found, with 4 patients (19%) exhibiting higher miR-126 expression (HOC group), up to 6-fold, compared with the control, and 17 patients (81%) with unchanged miR-126 expression (UOC group) (Fig. 2B;). However, the association between miR-126 expression and the risk of OC disease progression and death was not statistically significant according to Fisher's exact test (P=0.0797) (Table VIII).
| Table VIII.MicroRNA-126 expression in the white blood cells of patients with breast cancer type 1 gene methylated OC (n=21). |
mRNA in WBCs of patients with OC
When BRCA1 mRNA was measured in the WBCs of the patients with BRCA1-methylated OC, expression was significantly higher by up to 2.5-fold in the HOC group compared with that in the control group (P=0.0056). However, the UOC group did not significantly differ from the control group (P=0.1120) (Fig. 2C).
Circulating miR-126 in OC patients
When miR-126 expression was measured in the plasma of patients with OC, there was less circulating miR-126 in the HOC (P=0.0110) and UOC (P=0.0170) groups compared with that in age-matched controls (Fig. 2D).
miR-126 is elevated in WBCs but unchanged in the plasma of CF BRCA1-methylated female carriers
To further appreciate the use of miR-126 as a biomarker for the early prediction of BC and OC, miR-126 levels were measured in the WBC and plasma from 10 BRCA1 methylated CF female carriers (age range, 18–27 years; median age, 20 years). A greatly increased level of miR-126 expression, up to 27-fold higher, was noted in the WBCs of all the carriers compared with that in the age-matched control group. This result is similar to the miR-126 expression in the WBCs from the patients with BC and OC (Fig. 3A). In contrast to that in the patients with BC and OC, there was no change in the level of circulating miR-126 in the carrier group compared with the control group (Fig. 3C). This result revealed that, in the CF BRCA1-methylated carriers, miR-126 is altered in WBCs but not in the plasma.
mRNA in WBCs of CF carriers
Similar to the results in patients with BC and OC, when BRCA1 mRNA was measured in the WBCs of the CF BRCA1 methylation carriers, expression was significantly higher, up to 20-fold, in the carrier group compared with that in the age-matched control group (P<0.0001) (Fig. 3B).
miR-126 is elevated in the WBCs of CF BRCA1-methylated newborn female carriers. As BRCA1 promoter methylation is detectable from early on in life in carriers (22,24), miR-126 was measured in the WBCs of 13 BRCA1-methylated newborn female carriers. A significantly higher miR-126 expression level, up to 20-fold higher, was observed in the newborn carrier group compared with that in the newborn non-carrier control group (P=0.0391) (Fig. 3D). This result indicates an alteration in miR-126 from early on in the life of the carriers.
Discussion
There is a well-established association between BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood cells and the risk of BC and OC (20,22,23,36). However, less is known about its role in the cancer risk of CF BRCA1-methylated females. In the present study, BRCA1 promoter methylation was detected in peripheral WBCs in 9.4% of 425 CF female controls. This result agrees with our previous findings (16,21). The detection of methylated BRCA1 promoter in CF females raises the question of whether those individuals are at increased risk of developing BC or OC later in life. In the present study, miR-126 was investigated as a potential molecular biomarker for predicting BC and OC risk in CF BRCA1-methylated females.
In total, 502 patients with BC were screened for BRCA1-methylation in peripheral WBCs. BRCA1 promoter methylation was significantly associated with early onset BC (P=0.0003), which agrees with the results of previous studies (16,17,21,36). Typically, TNG BC accounts for 10–20% of all BC cases (37). In the BRCA1 methylated BC cases in the present study, TNG BC accounted for 34% compared with 17.4% of the unmethylated BC cases, which indicates enrichment of TNG BC in BRCA1 methylation-positive cases. This finding agrees with a recent study (18), which investigated the association between the BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood and the risk of TNG BC. The study reported that 30.2% of the TNG BC cases exhibited a methylated BRCA1 gene status in the peripheral blood cells, indicating a significant association between constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation and TNG BC (18).
Furthermore, in the present study, 187 patients with OC were screened for methylated BRCA1. A significant association was found between WBC methylated BRCA1 and OC incidence (P=0.0266). The vast majority of the methylated OC cases were HGSOC. These results agree with previously reported data, where it was shown that the frequency of BRCA1 methylation in WBCs was higher in patients with OC than in controls and that it was associated with risk for HGSOC (22).
miR-126 is downregulated in tumor tissues compared with that in normal adjacent tissues in several cancer types, including BC, OC and colorectal cancer, and this decrease is associated with higher malignancy tumor grade and metastasis (31,32,38). The restoration of miR-126 has been demonstrated to inhibit metastasis properties in these cancer types (32,38).
By contrast, it has been reported that in BC, miR-126 is increased significantly in DCIS tissue compared with that in IDC and normal adjacent tissue. In addition, the downregulation of miR-126 is associated with the later onset of IDC (39). These findings suggest that non-invasive tumor cells inside DCIS may counteract the progression to an invasive lesion by increasing the level of miR-126 expression (39). In the present study, the results revealed a significant association between an increase in miR-126 expression in WBCs and a lower risk of distant metastasis in patients with BRCA1-methylated and unmethylated BC.
In patients with OC, the expression of miR-126 in WBCs was significantly associated with a higher risk of disease progression and death in the present study. These results suggest that miR-126 is a dual-functional miRNA, functioning as a tumor suppressor in BC and as an oncogene in OC, which may indicate different targets and mechanisms of action in the two types of cancer. Indeed, it was previously reported that the abundance of miRNAs and their targets could contribute to their contradictory roles in cancer (40). Notably, as WBCs are considered normal cells with the body tissues, the present findings might suggest an increase in miR-126 in the whole body. However, further studies are needed to address these findings.
Similar to the findings in patients with BC and OC, increased miR-126 expression was observed in the WBCs of CF BRCA1-methylated carriers compared with that in age-matched controls. Unlike that in patients with cancer, miR-126 expression was not decreased in any of the carriers. Notably, the increase in miR-126 appears to occur from early on in the life of the carriers, as significant upregulation of miR-126 expression was observed in newborn female carriers. As BRCA1 epimutation is present from early on in the life of the carriers (24), we hypothesize that the increase in miR-126 could be a protective mechanism activated by the whole body, from the start of life, as a response to the epigenetically altered cancer suppressor gene, BRCA1. This claim is supported by the increase in BRCA1 mRNA expression in the patients and carriers despite the methylation status of the BRCA1 promoter. It has been reported that some hypermethylated genes are overexpressed due to the interaction with other factors (41). Based on the present findings, it is tempting to speculate that the increase in BRCA1 mRNA, which occurs from early on in the life of the carriers (24), could be the result of the interaction with other factors regulated by miR-126. The inevitable activation of the carcinogenic mechanisms derived by the constitutional methylation of the BRCA1 promoter, such as genomic instability, gross chromosomal rearrangements and generation of mutations, may result in the loss of miR-126 that leads to carcinogenesis (42). We therefore hypothesize that the upregulation of miR-126 could be part of a mechanism linking constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation with the pathological consequences induced by this epigenetic defect. Indeed, it has been reported that miR-126 is reversibly increased in response to short-term exposure to asbestos as a defensive process activating detoxifying mechanisms (42). However, long-lasting asbestos exposure results in the irreversible downregulation of miR-126 due to asbestos-induced DNA damage. The reduction in miR-126 activates the IRS1/PI3K/AKT pathway leading to the development of malignant mesothelioma (42). Thus, the expression of miR-126 links asbestos exposure to malignant mesothelioma.
Circulating miR-126 has been reported to differentiate patients with cancer from controls (43). In the present study, decreased circulating miR-126 was observed in the patients with BC and OC compared with that in healthy controls, regardless of its level in the WBCs, which agrees with previously reported data (27,29). Notably, the fact that there was no derease in the level of circulating miR-126 in the CF BRCA1 methylated carriers, despite the increase in the WBCs, suggests the use of miR-126 as a prognosticator for BC and OC risk for those carriers.
The present study has certain limitations. For example, the physiological association between miR-126 and BRCA1 in WBCs has not been explored. Further studies are needed to investigate if there is any transcriptional regulation between BRCA1 and miR-126. Additionally, future studies are needed to search for the different targets of miR-126 in BC and OC cancer that contribute to its contradictory actions in these two types of cancer.
In conclusion, the present study revealed the likely involvement of miR-126 in the constitutional methylation of BRCA1 promoter-related malignancies. Significant upregulation was observed in the level of miR-126 in WBCs, not only in patients with BC and OC, but also in CF BRCA1 methylated carriers. Overall, the increase in miR-126 could be a mechanism activated by the body in response to the aberrantly methylated cancer-suppressor gene BRCA1, which has different pathological consequences according to cancer type.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr Ayodele Alaiya (Department of Stem Cells, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) for providing help in collecting the clinical data of the patients.
Funding
This project was funded by the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
MAS, NAY and NAM performed the data analysis. MAS, WA, SA and AA contributed to the sample and data collection. OA and HA permitted sample collection and contributed to data acquisition. NAM conceived and designed the study and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. OA, HA and AA confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval (approval no. RAC #2170017) was obtained by the Human Research Ethics Committee of King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre. All participants provided written informed consent. The guardian of the patient provided written informed consent for participants <18 years old.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Glossary
Abbreviations
Abbreviations:
|
BC |
breast cancer |
|
BRCA1 |
breast cancer type 1 gene |
|
CF |
cancer-free |
|
miR-126 |
microRNA-126 |
|
OC |
ovarian cancer |
|
RT-qPCR |
reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction |
|
WBC |
white blood cell |
References
|
McCormick B, Winter K, Hudis C, Kuerer HM, Rakovitch E, Smith BL, Sneige N, Moughan J, Shah A, Germain I, et al: RTOG 9804: A prospective randomized trial for good-risk ductal carcinoma in situ comparing radiotherapy with observation. J Clin Oncol. 33:709–715. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Corben AD: Pathology of invasive breast disease. Surg Clin North Am. 93:363–392. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Duraker N, Hot S, Akan A and Nayir PO: A comparison of the clinicopathological features, metastasis sites and survival outcomes of invasive lobular, invasive ductal and mixed invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinoma. Eur J Breast Health. 16:22–31. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cho KR and Shih IM: Ovarian cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 4:287–313. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chan JK, Cheung MK, Husain A, Teng NN, West D, Whittemore AS, Berek JS and Osann K: Patterns and progress in ovarian cancer over 14 years. Obstet Gynecol. 108((3 Pt 1)): 521–528. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jacinto FV and Esteller M: Mutator pathways unleashed by epigenetic silencing in human cancer. Mutagenesis. 22:247–253. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Futreal PA, Liu Q, Shattuck-Eidens D, Cochran C, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Bennett LM, Haugen-Strano A, Swensen J and Miki Y: BRCA1 mutations in primary breast and ovarian carcinomas. Science. 266:120–122. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Birgisdottir V, Stefansson OA, Bodvarsdottir SK, Hilmarsdottir H, Jonasson JG and Eyfjord JE: Epigenetic silencing and deletion of the BRCA1 gene in sporadic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 8:R382006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Esteller M, Silva JM, Dominguez G, Bonilla F, Matias-Guiu X, Lerma E, Bussaglia E, Prat J, Harkes IC, Repasky EA, et al: Promoter hypermethylation and BRCA1 inactivation in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 92:564–569. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Butcher DT and Rodenhiser DI: Epigenetic inactivation of BRCA1 is associated with aberrant expression of CTCF and DNA methyltransferase (DNMT3B) in some sporadic breast tumours. Eur J Cancer. 43:210–219. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sudbø J, Reith A and Lingjaerde OC: Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 344:20292001.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M, Peterse HL, van der Kooy K, Marton MJ, Witteveen AT, et al: Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 415:530–536. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sahnane N, Carnevali I, Formenti G, Casarin J, Facchi S, Bombelli R, Di Lauro E, Memoli D, Salvati A, Rizzo F, et al: BRCA methylation testing identifies a subset of ovarian carcinomas without germline variants that can benefit from PARP inhibitor. Int J Mol Sci. 21:97082020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang YQ, Yan Q, Zhang JR, Li SD, Yang YX and Wan XP: Epigenetic inactivation of BRCA1 through promoter hypermethylation in ovarian cancer progression. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 39:549–554. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Snell C, Krypuy M, Wong EM; kConFab investigators, ; Loughrey MB and Dobrovic A: BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood DNA of mutation negative familial breast cancer patients with a BRCA1 tumour phenotype. Breast Cancer Res. 10:R122008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Al-Moghrabi N, Al-Qasem AJ and Aboussekhra A: Methylation-related mutations in the BRCA1 promoter in peripheral blood cells from cancer-free women. Int J Oncol. 39:129–135. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wong EM, Southey MC, Fox SB, Brown MA, Dowty JG, Jenkins MA, Giles GG, Hopper JL and Dobrovic A: Constitutional methylation of the BRCA1 promoter is specifically associated with BRCA1 mutation-associated pathology in early-onset breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 4:23–33. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Prajzendanc K, Domagala P, Hybiak J, Rys J, Huzarski T, Szwiec M, Tomiczek-Szwiec J, Redelbach W, Sejda A, Gronwald J, et al: BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood is associated with the risk of triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 146:1293–1298. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gupta S, Jaworska-Bieniek K, Narod SA, Lubinski J, Wojdacz TK and Jakubowska A: Methylation of the BRCA1 promoter in peripheral blood DNA is associated with triple-negative and medullary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 148:615–622. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Iwamoto T, Yamamoto N, Taguchi T, Tamaki Y and Noguchi S: BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood cells is associated with increased risk of breast cancer with BRCA1 promoter methylation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 129:69–77. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Al-Moghrabi N, Nofel A, Al-Yousef N, Madkhali S, Amer SM, Alaiya A, Shinwari Z, Al-Tweigeri T, Karakas B, Tulbah A and Aboussekhra A: The molecular significance of methylated BRCA1 promoter in white blood cells of cancer-free females. BMC Cancer. 14:8302014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lønning PE, Berge EO, Bjørnslett M, Minsaas L, Chrisanthar R, Høberg-Vetti H, Dulary C, Busato F, Bjørneklett S, Eriksen C, et al: White blood cell BRCA1 promoter methylation status and ovarian cancer risk. Ann Intern Med. 168:326–334. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jung Y, Hur S, Liu J, Lee S, Kang BS, Kim M and Choi YJ: Peripheral blood BRCA1 methylation profiling to predict familial ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 32:e232021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Al-Moghrabi N, Al-Showimi M, Al-Yousef N, Al-Shahrani B, Karakas B, Alghofaili L, Almubarak H, Madkhali S and Al Humaidan H: Methylation of BRCA1 and MGMT genes in white blood cells are transmitted from mothers to daughters. Clin Epigenetics. 10:992018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bosviel R, Garcia S, Lavediaux G, Michard E, Dravers M, Kwiatkowski F, Bignon YJ and Bernard-Gallon DJ: BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood DNA was identified in sporadic breast cancer and controls. Cancer Epidemiol. 36:e177–e182. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Calin GA and Croce CM: MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 6:857–866. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tomasetti M, Gaetani S, Monaco F, Neuzil J and Santarelli L: Epigenetic regulation of miRNA expression in malignant mesothelioma: MiRNAs as biomarkers of early diagnosis and therapy. Front Oncol. 9:12932019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tavazoie SF, Alarcon C, Oskarsson T, Padua D, Wang Q, Bos PD, Gerald WL and Massague J: Endogenous human microRNAs that suppress breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 451:147–152. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Meister J and Schmidt MHH: MiR-126 and miR-126*: New players in cancer. ScientificWorldJournal. 10:2090–2100. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bockmeyer CL, Christgen M, Müller M, Fischer S, Ahrens P, Länger F, Kreipe H and Lehmann U: MicroRNA profiles of healthy basal and luminal mammary epithelial cells are distinct and reflected in different breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 130:735–745. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang F, Zheng Z, Guo J and Ding X: Correlation and quantitation of microRNA aberrant expression in tissues and sera from patients with breast tumor. Gynecol Oncol. 119:586–593. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang Y, Qin X, Jiang J and Zhao W: MicroRNA-126 exerts antitumor functions in ovarian cancer by targeting EGFL7 and affecting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and ERK/MAPK signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 20:1327–1335. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pan C, Stevic I, Muller V, Ni Q, Oliveira-Ferrer L, Pantel K and Schwarzenbach H: Exosomal microRNAs as tumor markers in epithelial ovarian cancer. Mol Oncol. 12:1935–1948. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wyman SK, Parkin RK, Mitchell PS, Fritz BR, O'Briant K, Godwin AK, Urban N, Drescher CW, Knudsen BS and Tewari M: Repertoire of microRNAs in epithelial ovarian cancer as determined by next generation sequencing of small RNA cDNA libraries. PLoS One. 4:e53112009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Azzollini J, Pesenti C, Pizzamiglio S, Fontana L, Guarino C, Peissel B, Plebani M, Tabano S, Sirchia SM, Colapietro P, et al: Constitutive BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation can be a predisposing event in isolated early-onset breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 11:582019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nakai K, Hung MC and Yamaguchi H: A perspective on anti-EGFR therapies targeting triple-negative breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 6:1609–1623. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang Y, Wang X, Xu B, Wang B, Wang Z, Liang Y, Zhou J, Hu J and Jiang B: Epigenetic silencing of miR-126 contributes to tumor invasion and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep. 30:1976–1984. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Volinia S, Bertagnolo V, Grassilli S, Brugnoli F, Manfrini M, Galasso M, Scatena C, Mazzanti CM, Lessi F, Naccarato G, et al: Levels of miR-126 and miR-218 are elevated in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and inhibit malignant potential of DCIS derived cells. Oncotarget. 9:23543–23553. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xiang Y, Tian Q, Guan L and Niu SS: The dual role of miR-186 in cancers: Oncomir battling with tumor suppressor miRNA. Front Oncol. 10:2332020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Orgueira AM: Hidden among the crowd: Differential DNA methylation-expression correlations in cancer occur at important oncogenic pathways. Front Genet. 6:1632015.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Andersen M, Grauslund M, Ravn J, Sorensen JB, Andersen CB and Santoni-Rugiu E: Diagnostic potential of miR-126, miR-143, miR-145, and miR-652 in malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Mol Diagn. 16:418–430. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yan J, Ma S, Zhang Y, Yin C, Zhou X and Zhang G: Potential role of microRNA-126 in the diagnosis of cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 95:e46442016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |
