Immunohistochemical profiling of the tumour microenvironment in borderline and malignant ovarian tumours in young women
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 15, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13763
- Article Number: 177
-
Copyright : © O'Νeill et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].
Abstract
Introduction
Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer affecting women world-wide (1) and has a UK incidence of over 7,400 cases per year (2). Approximately 70% of women present at an advanced stage with evidence of metastatic disease (3,4). More than 80% of women with stage 3 and 4 disease respond to surgical debulking and chemotherapy (5), however recurrences tend to occur within 22 months. The overall 5 year survival rate is poor (27%) (4,6).
It was not until 2003 that Zhang et al (7) demonstrated the association between tumour-infiltrating T cells (CD3+) and prognosis in ovarian cancer. They showed a 5-year survival of 38% in cancers with CD3+ infiltration compared to 4.3% in those where such infiltrates were not evident. It also significantly affected progression-free survival and correlated with delayed recurrence and delayed death. Tumours with high T cell infiltration were more likely to achieve complete cytoreduction (7).
The relevance of TILs has been highlighted in several other solid cancers such as breast and liver (8,9). Additionally, it is not simply the presence or absence of TILs that is of importance, it is their location within the tissue that is becoming of interest. A study by Sato et al (10) highlighted the importance of identifying the precise in situ localisation of the TILs suggesting that their topographic location within an ovarian tumour could be of significance to the outcome. This has also been explored by Toss et al (11) in breast carcinoma. It is known from prior studies that the presence of TILs in invasive breast cancer positively augmented the effect of chemotherapy mainly in triple-negative cancers (12), prompting the publishing of guidelines recommending TILs evaluation.
Many studies have demonstrated that a lack of TIL infiltration is associated with a poorer outcome in many solid cancers, however the population used in these amongst ovarian cancer studies tends to be older women with a median age in the fifth or sixth decade of life. A meta-analysis performed on TILs in ovarian cancer identified ten suitable studies and the mean age of patients was between 55 and 62 (13).
The significance of TILs in young women with ovarian cancer is yet to be explored. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyse, in detail, the expression and topographical distribution of CD20 and CD3 tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and their impact on prognosis or response to therapy in ovarian cancer women under the age of 50. Comparisons were drawn between histologically borderline tumours and frankly invasive carcinomas.
Materials and methods
Study cohort
This was a retrospective study of women under the age of 50 who underwent surgery for a borderline or invasive ovarian tumour between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2015 at the Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom. Ethical approval was sought and granted by the West Midlands-Black Country NRES Committee (07/Q2702/24). Women aged less than 50 were specifically chosen because this age group is under-represented in the current literature and may demonstrate a different pathophysiological course in comparison to women of an older age.
The patients were identified by searching the clinical and pathology databases. Clinicopathological data including patients' age, tumour type, disease stage, management, recurrence and survival were retrieved from case notes and electronic records. Data including overall survival and disease specific survival was collected till 1st December 2019. Information was gathered on standard treatment regimens but data on complementary and alternative medicine was not available and has not been included. Women received standard therapy as per local guidance so would have received the same treatment in accordance with their diagnosis. The influence of any additional treatment factors within this cohort would be marginal and so are likely representative of the general patient population.
Immunohistochemistry
Slide review and histological selection of representative full face formalin fixed paraffin wax embedded tumour blocks of the primary treatment naïve tumours was performed. Representative 4 microsections were prepared and immunohistochemically stained for CD3 and CD20 using the Dako Link autostainer using ready-to-use CD3 and CD20 antibodies following the manufacturer's instructions. CD3 staining was completed utilising the Agilent anti-human CD3 polyclonal ready-to-use antibody (product GA503, CE-IVD). CD20 staining was completed utilising the Agilent anti-human CD20 ready to use antibody, clone L26 (product GA604, CE-IVD). Both assays were completed on the Agilent OMNIS platform and visualised with the EnVision FLEX DAB detection kit. The CD3 assay is a pan T-cell marker well suited to labelling reactive T-cells in tissue with lymphoid infiltrates, the CD20 assay reacts with an intracytoplasmic epitope localised on the CD20 antigen and labels cells of the B-cell lineage. Both assays reliably label human B-cells or T-cells in histological tissue preparations. Antibodies were used as per their published protocol. Sections were anonymised using unique identification numbers by a third party and assessors were blinded to the patient and clinical data. Slides were scored manually by one investigator (DO) overseen by a pathologist (AMS). Guidelines produced by the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group (8) aim to standardise the assessment of TILs in solid tumours and this guidance was applied to counting the TIL populations in our samples. Briefly, the number of positively stained CD3 or CD20 cells present in ten high-power fields (HPFs) was counted and average per HPF calculated. The percentage infiltration of TILs representing the area occupied by the immune cells in relation to the total stromal area present was also estimated for each patient following the guidelines of the International ImmunoOncology Group (8). Representative slides of CD3 and CD20 IHC staining are shown in Fig. 1.
Scoring of TILs expression
Intratumoural lymphocytes were defined as those in direct contact with tumour cells or within the tumour itself. The stromal lymphocytes were defined as those lying within the tumoural stroma. Hotspots representing regions with highest densities were recorded if present. Touching lymphocytes were defined as the number of lymphocytes touching the basement membrane or within one lymphocyte cell diameter from the basement membrane as previously described and are shown in Fig. 1C (11). This method was shown to have minimal intra-observer variance and good concordance (11). Lymphoid aggregates (well defined, densely populated areas of lymphocytes within the stroma) where present, were also scored and are shown in Fig. 1D. Any discrepancies were subsequently reviewed by both assessors and a consensus was reached.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software version 26 (IBM Corp.). Normally distributed data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. For data without normal distribution, such as age, median values (with interquartile range) are presented. Chi-squared analysis (χ2) was used to correlate patient outcome (dead vs. alive) with tumour type. The nonparametric independent samples median test [Mann-Whitney-U Wilcoxon (rank sum) test (MWW)] and Kruskal-Wallis test (KWt) were performed to compare the means and medians of the variables, including age, CD3, CD20, touching lymphocytes count, aggregates and hot spot counts among different groups. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) was used to correlate continuous variables of biomarker expression with clinical variables (e.g., age, CA125, RMI). All comparisons were two sided and significance threshold was set to a p-value of less than 0.05. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to determine overall and disease specific survival in relation to TILs expression in the studied cohort. In accordance with the journal's guidelines, we will provide our data for the reproducibility of this study in other centres if such is requested.
Results
Patient characteristics
A total of 58 patients fulfilled the initial inclusion criteria, however one was subsequently excluded due to a diagnosis of primary colonic malignancy, giving a total of 57 cases in the cohort. There were 23 women in the borderline cohort and 34 in the invasive cancer cohort. The histological diagnoses and patient characteristics are described in Table I. The median age was 41 (Interquartile range 28.5-46), with over a third of women belonging to the over 45 category. There was no significant difference in age at diagnosis between invasive ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumour (BOT) (MWW, P=0.33). The majority of women (89.5%) were of white ethnicity, with representation from black Caribbean, Pakistani and Indian ethnicities included. The most common diagnosis was serous epithelial ovarian cancer (n=21, 36.8%), followed by mucinous BOT and serous BOT. Women largely presented in stage 1 (59.6%) or stage 3 (26.3%) disease.
The median follow up was 56 months (range 1–114 months). A total of 15 women (44%) succumbed to their disease and this was exclusively within the cancer cohort. No deaths were seen in the BOT category. The risk of malignancy index (RMI) was significantly greater among the women diagnosed with cancer (MWW, P=0.04) and the CA125 serum level tended to be higher within the cancer cohort (MWW, P=0.05).
CD3 expression
Regardless of the underlying histology, we noted that within our cohort there was a greater infiltration of CD3 cells within the stroma compared to CD20 cells. The mean CD3 infiltration was 91.3 (SD 102.4) whilst with CD20 cells the mean was 14.6 (SD 18.7) as shown in Fig. 2A and B. There were significantly more CD3 and CD20 TILs residing in the stroma compared to within the tumour (MWW, P=0.01 and P=0.008). The infiltration of T cells (CD3 positive) was significantly greater within the stroma of cancer cases compared to BOT (MWW, P=0.02) as shown in Fig. 2C. The median CD3 stromal count for both clear cell and endometrioid cancers was 139, compared to 84.5 in serous cancer per 10 high power fields. Within the BOT samples, the median CD3 stromal count was much lower, with 23 and 46.5 for serous and mucinous BOT respectively. When considering the percentage stromal infiltration, the clear cell cancers had the greatest abundance with a median of 25%, compared to 15% in endometrioid, 7% in serous cancer and 5% in mucinous cancer. The percentage stromal infiltration was much greater in cancer compared to BOT, however, as the mucinous BOT had a median percentage of 1.25%, whilst the serous BOT had 0.5%. The mean CD3 stromal and intra-tumoural lymphocyte count did not significantly differ between the different epithelial cancer histological subtypes (KWt, stromal P=0.36 and intra-tumoural P=0.15). The intra-tumoural infiltration of CD3 cells was not significantly greater in cancer compared to BOT (MWW, P=0.25).
CD20 expression
Overall, the expression of CD20 in various compartments was much less than that of CD3. There was a trend to a greater presence of B cells (CD20 positive) within the stroma of cancerous tumours in comparison to BOT (MWW, P=0.06) as shown in Fig. 2D. The median CD20 stromal infiltration was greatest in endometrioid cancer with a score of 13.8, whilst in serous cancer it was 0 (absent). Within the borderline cancers, mucinous BOT had a median CD20 infiltration of 1 and serous BOT had a median of 0. Similar to our findings with CD3 aggregates, there was no significant difference in the presence of CD20 aggregates within the samples (MWW, P=0.22). The stromal CD20 infiltration was not significantly greater in the different histological subtypes, nor was it significant for intra-tumoural infiltration. The intra-tumoural infiltration of CD20 positive lymphocytes attained significance, with more CD20 TILs present in the cancer samples compared to BOT (MWW, P=0.048).
Touching lymphocyte
The number of T and B lymphocytes within the stroma touching the tumour (touching lymphocytes) was not significantly different between ovarian cancer and BOT (MWW, CD3 P=0.81 and CD20 P=0.46), demonstrated in Fig. 3. In addition, there was no significant difference between the number of touching lymphocytes between the different ovarian cancer subtypes with CD3 cells (KWt, P=0.67) or CD20 cells (KWt, P=0.72).
TILs aggregates and hotspots
The presence of CD3 aggregates were not significantly different in either the cancer or BOT samples (MWW, P=0.09), nor were there more CD3 hotspots in one cohort over the other (MWW, P=0.81).
Correlation with patients' outcome
We evaluated the relationship between the presence of TILs and prognostic indicators. Primarily, all of the deaths occurred within the cancer cohort [n=15/34 (44%) χ2, P=0.001] with no mortality within the BOT group. The median survival was 34.8 months in the cancer cohort and mortality did not depend on the underlying histological cancer subtype, with a significance value of P=0.10 (KWt). The infiltration of CD3 or CD20 TILs in the stroma or tumour and the number of aggregates or hotspots were not predictive of mortality. Additionally, the number of touching lymphocytes of CD3 or CD20 cells was not associated with mortality (MWW, P=0.64 and P=0.33 respectively). The Kaplan-Meier curve in Fig. 4 demonstrates no mortality within the BOT cohort and that clear cell carcinoma was associated with the poorest prognosis.
CD3 and CD20 stromal infiltration was significantly correlated with the serum CA125 level (rs, P=0.005 and P<0.001 respectively). No statistically significant correlation was found between, intra-tumoural CD3 or CD20 TILs, the presence of aggregates or hotspots and serum CA125.
Discussion
Our results have primarily demonstrated that there were significantly more CD3 than CD20 TILs in the stroma of our specimens. There were significantly more CD3 TILs within the stroma of ovarian cancers in comparison to BOT and significantly more CD20 within the tumour of cancerous neoplasms in comparison to BOT. Collectively, however, these results failed to impact on prognosis or mortality or response to therapy.
In the context of published literature, this is the first study to analyse the role of TILs in ovarian neoplasms of young women. Our results show a predominant infiltration by CD3 TILs and their greater infiltration within the stroma of ovarian cancer cases compared to those with BOT. This finding is consistent with other literature in ovarian cancer of older women, but also in other solid cancers. Stromal TILs have been found to be prognostic of outcome in triple negative breast cancer and as such, their routine reporting has been proposed (14,15). Within ovarian cancer, this has been previously demonstrated comparing benign and malignant ovarian tumours whereby those which were malignant had a greater stromal infiltration (16). A recent systematic review on TILs in ovarian cancer highlighted a lack of reliable studies investigating stromal CD3 TILs therefore a conclusion was not able to be formed, however intratumoural CD3 TILs were associated with increased progression-free survival and overall survival (17). Our results did not identify a significant relationship between TIL infiltration and prognosis, a finding that has been corroborated in other published work (18). In addition, a comparison between malignant and BOT, to our knowledge, has not been performed previously.
CD20 positive B cells have been shown to be associated with an improved clinical outcome in high grade serous (HGS) cancer (19–21) as well as other cancers including lung, melanoma and breast (22–26). We demonstrated that CD20 infiltration was considerably lower than that of CD3 infiltration in both the stroma and intra-tumoural compartments.
In our cohort, CD20 prevalence was reduced in HGS ovarian cancer in comparison to endometrioid and mucinous cancers. This is in contrast to the findings by Milne et al (27) who demonstrated a greater infiltration of CD20 positive cells in HGS cancer. They also found that disease-specific survival was greater in those with greater CD20 infiltration (27). CD20 TILs are thought to have antigen-presenting cell functionality as well as a direct cytolytic response (19) so contribute greatly to the immune microenvironment. The cohort used within that study, however, was considerably older than our cohort. Whether age affects the tumour biology and subsequent immune infiltration is unknown but work is currently underway to investigate this. There are no published studies identifying the differences in stromal infiltration of B cells between the different ovarian cancer subtypes.
Aside from primary tumours, CD20 positive B cells have also been found to be present in omental metastases of HGS ovarian cancer, localising mainly in lymphoid aggregates within the stroma. Their presence was unaffected by the exposure to chemotherapy, however those who had been exposed to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy had a greater proportion of class-switched memory B cells, potentially contributing to an improved response to therapy (28). The presence of stromal CD20 cells has also been associated with the absence of lymph node metastases and therefore may play a role in preventing metastatic spread.
It is known that there is significant heterogeneity of immune cells within the tumour microenvironment between patients and also between different sites in the same patient (29–31). Additionally, the degree of infiltration of CD3+ cells prior to chemotherapy has, however, been shown to vary wildly within HGS cancer patients (21). As such, the interrelationship of both T and B cells should be considered. A meta-analysis demonstrated that the presence of intraepithelial CD3+ and CD8+ lymphocytes improved survival despite significant heterogeneity between the published studies (13).
Despite multiple publications demonstrating correlation of TILs infiltration and prognosis in HGS ovarian cancer and other solid tumours, our results did not corroborate with this in this young age group. This may be due to the population we sampled as we chose a specific population of women presenting with ovarian tumours under the age of 50. As such these women may present atypically and demonstrate a different biology/immune infiltrate when compared to the more common presentation of women in their 5th or 6th decade of life. There has been one study identified which split their cohort into 2; those aged less than 52 and those greater than 52. This did not show any difference in CD3 infiltration between the cohorts, suggesting that age may not be an important factor. They also found that tumour size or its location, presence of ascites, and lymph node metastasis had no significant association with the densities of CD3 cells (32).
In addition to this, our population was rather unique as the vast majority of women presented in stage 1 of their disease. Usually, women tend to present at stage 3 or 4 due to the vague presenting symptoms and late diagnosis. Whether this also has contributed to our findings is unclear; perhaps women presenting in later stage disease have greater stromal and intra-tumoural infiltration compared to those women in stage 1, potentially dictated by their histological sub-type and host genetic and immune factors. Our population was also largely consisting of white women with very few women representing ethnic minority groups. This needs to be considered and further work is required to detect any interracial differences within the population.
We showed that touching lymphocytes were not predictive of histology or prognosis. We assessed this parameter because dense touching lymphocytes in other cancers such as breast cancers have been associated with more aggressive tumours, a shorter recurrence-free interval and ductal carcinoma in situ recurrence. When more traditional methods of scoring were used, such as counting stromal or intra-epithelial TILs, there was considerable variability in association with the outcome. This method of counting was also shown to be superior with regards to reproducibility between assessors (11). Whether touching lymphocytes become more reliable and predictive in the older population with ovarian cancer is unknown.
Our findings suggested that CD3 and CD20 infiltration was greatest in endometrioid cancers but there was no statistically significant difference demonstrated between the different ovarian cancer subtypes or the prognosis. The density of infiltration can vary considerably between patients and even within the same patient, as mentioned above, so it may be necessary to expand our cohort to see if any of results attain significance. It has been found that TIL infiltration was greatest in HGS and endometrioid ovarian cancer in both intra-tumoural and stromal samples, however it was unclear as to the cell types included within the ‘TIL’ definition. Interestingly, our results echo their findings that there was no statistically significant difference in prognosis between those with a greater TIL infiltration and those with few TILs (33). No existing publications were identified that investigated T and B cell infiltration specifically in the various sub-types of ovarian cancer; most focus solely on the most common, HGS cancer. As such this research would be a welcome contribution to existing knowledge.
In accordance with the findings of Toss et al (11) in breast carcinoma, we found no significant association between the presence of TILs hotspots or aggregates with prognosis.
We found that the risk of malignancy index (RMI) and CA125 were greater in women with cancer compared to women with a diagnosis of BOT. It has been shown that CA125 has a linear relationship with CD3 infiltration (32), which corresponds to our findings. RMI is used to differentiate cancer from benign lesions (34), however it has also been shown to differentiate benign from borderline tumours (35). There is limited published data concerning the use of RMI to differentiate BOT and ovarian cancer as usually these diagnoses are grouped together and compared to benign tumours.
While this is a retrospective cohort, there are several strengths to this study. The patient cohort is unique (including young women with ovarian cancer and separating borderline and ovarian malignancies; two cohorts that are often grouped together) with a long follow up. There was rigorous histological assessment with slide review, selection of representative tumour blocks, optimal staining following diagnostic standards in a UKAS accredited laboratory and detailed TILs assessment following international guidance and overseen by experienced pathologists. Potential weaknesses with this study lie in its small size of cohort and consequently poor ethnic diversity.
This research has shown an increase in TILs in cancer specimens but that this does not impact on mortality or prognosis, therefore TILs assessment in routine histological assessment is not duly warranted. In addition, the assessment of touching lymphocytes was not predictive of prognosis and as such does not require particular assessment, unlike that advised in the histological assessment of breast carcinoma.
To further this work, it would be prudent to investigate the relationship of both CD3 and CD20 positive cells to other important immunoregulatory cells, such as CD8 T cells and macrophages. It has been extensively demonstrated that CD8 cells are found in tertiary lymphoid structures with CD20 B cells, alongside dendritic cells (20). Tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) have been found to exhibit an immunomodulatory effect on the tumour microenvironment with M2 subset enabling tumour growth in both the primary and metastatic sites. It has been shown that TAMs have been identified in greater numbers at sites of metastasis in comparison to primary sites, demonstrating their potential role in creating an environment conducive to metastatic deposit and development (31,36). Additionally, further work is required in an older population to determine if our findings remain true in women presenting over the age of 50.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
AMS is funded by Birmingham Cancer Research UK Centre (grant no. C17422/A25154).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
AMS and AEG conceived the original idea for the research, designed the study, performed the statistical analysis and contributed to writing. KR and AB reviewed tumour slides and selected representative blocks. DK performed the immunohistochemical staining. DO analysed the immunohistochemical staining under the supervision of AS, collected the outcome data and wrote the first draft. FB sought ethical approval, contributed to the study design and edited the manuscript. DO, AEG and AMS reviewed and confirmed the authenticity of the raw data. All authors contributed to editing the manuscript. The authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval was sought and granted by the West Midlands-Black Country (Wolverhampton, Birmingham, UK) NRES Committee (07/Q2702/24). Tissue was obtained via the University of Birmingham Human Biomaterials Resource Centre (HBRC) and therefore individual patient consent was not required.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Glossary
Abbreviations
Abbreviations:
BOT |
borderline ovarian tumour |
RMI |
Risk of Malignancy Index |
TILs |
tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes |
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A and Bray F: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 71:209–249. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cancer Research UK, . Available from. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/vulval-cancer#heading-ZeroSeptember 14–2018 | |
Lengyel E: Ovarian cancer development and metastasis. Am J Pathol. 177:1053–1064. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Giornelli GH: Management of relapsed ovarian cancer: A review. Springerplus. 5:11972016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ahmed N and Stenvers KL: Getting to know ovarian cancer ascites: Opportunities for targeted therapy-based translational research. Front Oncol. 3:2562013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kipps E, Tan DSP and Kaye SB: Meeting the challenge of ascites in ovarian cancer: New avenues for therapy and research. Nat Rev Cancer. 13:273–282. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang L, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, Gimotty PA, Massobrio M, Regnani G, Makrigiannakis A, Gray H, Schlienger K, Liebman MN, et al: Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 348:203–213. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hendry S, Salgado R, Gevaert T, Russell PA, John T, Thapa B, Christie M, van de Vijver K, Estrada MV, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, et al: Assessing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in solid tumors: A practical review for pathologists and proposal for a standardized method from the international immunooncology biomarkers working group: Part 1: Assessing the host immune response, TILs in invasive breast carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ, metastatic tumor deposits and areas for further research. Adv Anat Pathol. 24:235–251. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Garnelo M, Tan A, Her Z, Yeong J, Lim CJ, Chen J, Lim KH, Weber A, Chow P, Chung A, et al: Interaction between tumour-infiltrating B cells and T cells controls the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 66:342–351. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sato E, Olson SH, Ahn J, Bundy B, Nishikawa H, Qian F, Jungbluth AA, Frosina D, Gnjatic S, Ambrosone C, et al: Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:18538–18543. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Toss MS, Miligy I, Al-Kawaz A, Alsleem M, Khout H, Rida PC, Aneja R, Green AR, Ellis IO and Rakha EA: Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Mod Pathol. 31:1226–1236. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Loi S, Sirtaine N, Piette F, Salgado R, Viale G, Van Eenoo F, Rouas G, Francis P, Crown JPA, Hitre E, et al: Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial in node-positive breast cancer comparing the addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: BIG 02–98. J Clin Oncol. 31:860–867. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hwang WT, Adams SF, Tahirovic E, Hagemann IS and Coukos G: Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating T cells in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 124:192–198. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Burstein HJ, Curigliano G, Loibl S, Dubsky P, Gnant M, Poortmans P, Colleoni M, Denkert C, Piccart-Gebhart M, Regan M, et al: Estimating the benefits of therapy for early stage breast cancer. The St gallen international consensus guidelines for the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2019. Ann Oncol. 30:1541–1557. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kos Z, Roblin E, Kim RS, Michiels S, Gallas BD, Chen W, van de Vijver KK, Goel S, Adams S, Demaria S, et al: Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 6:172020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
de Lima CA, Jammal MP, Etchebehere RM, Murta EFC and Nomelini RS: Lymphocytes in peritumoral stroma: Evaluation in epithelial ovarian neoplasms. Immunol Invest. 49:397–405. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hao J, Yu H, Zhang T, An R and Xue Y: Prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in high grade serous ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 31:17588359209672412020.PubMed/NCBI | |
Darb-Esfahani S, Kolaschinski I, Trillsch F, Mahner S, Concin N, Vergote I, Nieuwenhuysen EL, Achimas-Cadariu P, Glajzer J, Woopen H, et al: Morphology and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in high-stage, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma correlated with long-term survival. Histopathology. 73:1002–1012. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nielsen JS, Sahota RA, Milne K, Kost SE, Nesslinger NJ, Watson PH and Nelson BH: CD20+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes have an atypical CD27-memory phenotype and together with CD8+ T cells promote favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 18:3281–3292. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Truxova I, Kasikova L, Hensler M, Skapa P, Laco J, Pecen L, Belicova L, Praznovec I, Halaska MJ, Brtnicky T, et al: Mature dendritic cells correlate with favorable immune infiltrate and improved prognosis in ovarian carcinoma patients. J Immunother Cancer. 4:1392018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lo CS, Sanii S, Kroeger DR, Milne K, Talhouk A, Chiu DS, Rahimi K, Shaw PA, Clarke BA and Nelson BH: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of ovarian cancer results in three patterns of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte response with distinct implications for immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 23:925–934. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Germain C, Gnjatic S, Tamzalit F, Knockaert S, Remark R, Goc J, Lepelley A, Becht E, Katsahian S, Bizouard G, et al: Presence of B cells in tertiary lymphoid structures is associated with a protective immunity in patients with lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 189:832–844. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ladányi A, Kiss J, Mohos A, Somlai B, Liszkay G, Gilde K, Fejös Z, Gaudi I, Dobos J and Tímár J: Prognostic impact of B-cell density in cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 60:1729–1738. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Iglesia MD, Vincent BG, Parker JS, Hoadley KA, Carey LA, Perou CM and Serody JS: Prognostic B-cell signatures using mRNA-seq in patients with subtype-specific breast and ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 20:3818–3829. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nedergaard BS, Ladekarl M, Nyengaard JR and Nielsen K: A comparative study of the cellular immune response in patients with stage IB cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Low numbers of several immune cell subtypes are strongly associated with relapse of disease within 5 years. Gynecol Oncol. 108:106–111. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arias-Pulido H, Cimino-Mathews A, Chaher N, Qualls C, Joste N, Colpaert C, Marotti JD, Foisey M, Prossnitz ER, Emens LA and Fiering S: The combined presence of CD20 + B cells and PD-L1 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in inflammatory breast cancer is prognostic of improved patient outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 171:273–282. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Milne K, Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Barnes RO, Gao D, Gilks CB, Watson PH and Nelson BH: Systematic analysis of immune infiltrates in high-grade serous ovarian cancer reveals CD20, FoxP3 and TIA-1 as positive prognostic factors. PLoS One. 4:e64122009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Montfort A, Pearce O, Maniati E, Vincent BG, Bixby L, Böhm S, Dowe T, Wilkes EH, Chakravarty P, Thompson R, et al: A strong B-cell response is part of the immune landscape in human high-grade serous ovarian metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 23:250–262. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maley CC, Aktipis A, Graham TA, Sottoriva A, Boddy AM, Janiszewska M, Silva AS, Gerlinger M, Yuan Y, Pienta KJ, et al: Classifying the evolutionary and ecological features of neoplasms. Nat Rev Cancer. 17:605–619. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Valastyan S and Weinberg RA: Tumor metastasis: Molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell. 147:275–292. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hensler M, Kasikova L, Fiser K, Rakova J, Skapa P, Laco J, Lanickova T, Pecen L, Truxova I, Vosahlikova S, et al: M2-like macrophages dictate clinically relevant immunosuppression in metastatic ovarian cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 8:e0009792020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dai D, Liu L, Huang H, Chen S, Chen B, Cao J, Luo X, Wang F, Luo R and Liu J: Nomograms to predict the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Front Oncol. 25:5904142021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
James FR, Jiminez-Linan M, Alsop J, Mack M, Song H, Brenton JD, Pharoah PDP and Ali HR: Association between tumour infiltrating lymphocytes, histotype and clinical outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 20:6572017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Geomini P, Kruitwagen R, Bremer GL, Cnossen J and Mol BWJ: The accuracy of risk scores in predicting ovarian malignancy: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 113((2 Pt 1)): 384–394. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang S, Yu S, Hou W, Li X, Ning C, Wu Y, Zhang F, Jiao YF, Lee LTO and Sun L: Diagnostic extended usefulness of RMI: Comparison of four risk of malignancy index in preoperative differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors and benign ovarian tumors. J Ovarian Res. 12:872019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Robinson-Smith TM, Isaacsohn I, Mercer CA, Zhou M, Van Rooijen N, Husseinzadeh N, McFarland-Mancini MM and Drew AF: Macrophages mediate inflammation-enhanced metastasis of ovarian tumors in mice. Cancer Res. 67:5708–5716. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |