Irinotecan combined or alternated with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid versus the Mayo Clinic regimen in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer

  • Authors:
    • Ullrich Graeven
    • Karsten Ridwelski
    • Maja Artandi
    • Pilar Espana
    • Jürgen Schölmerich
    • Adolfo M. Rosales
    • Göran CARLSSON
    • Markus Borner
    • Blandine Boussard
    • Wolff Schmiegel
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 1, 2005     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.13.4.681
  • Pages: 681-688
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of two regimens of irinotecan, combined or alternated with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA), and the Mayo Clinic regimen as first-line therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC). A total of 152 patients with advanced CRC were randomised, and 149 patients were treated intravenously by irinotecan 125 mg/m2, FA 20 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m2 bolus, weekly for 4 weeks (arm A, Saltz regimen; n=46), or irinotecan 350 mg/m2 alternating with FA 20 mg/m2/day followed by 5-FU bolus 425 mg/m2/day for 5 days (arm B; n=53), or FA 20 mg/m2/ day followed by 5-FU bolus 425 mg/m2/day over 5 days every 4 weeks (arm C, Mayo Clinic regimen; n=50). Patients were analyzed for tumor response, time to progression, overall survival, safety and quality of life. The overall response rate for evaluable patients in arm A was 33% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17-49%], in arm B was 32% (95% CI, 16-49%) and in arm C was 26% (95% CI, 12-40%). Median times to progression were 7.9, 7.0 and 6.9 months and median survival times were 22.2, 17.0 and 18.2 months for arms A, B and C, respectively, in the intention-to-treat population. The main grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (7%, 39% and 12%) and diarrhea (6%, 21% and 18%). In conclusion, both regimens containing irinotecan were active and well tolerated in patients with advanced CRC.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April 2005
Volume 13 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Graeven U, Ridwelski K, Artandi M, Espana P, Schölmerich J, Rosales AM, CARLSSON G, Borner M, Boussard B, Schmiegel W, Schmiegel W, et al: Irinotecan combined or alternated with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid versus the Mayo Clinic regimen in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep 13: 681-688, 2005.
APA
Graeven, U., Ridwelski, K., Artandi, M., Espana, P., Schölmerich, J., Rosales, A.M. ... Schmiegel, W. (2005). Irinotecan combined or alternated with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid versus the Mayo Clinic regimen in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer. Oncology Reports, 13, 681-688. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.13.4.681
MLA
Graeven, U., Ridwelski, K., Artandi, M., Espana, P., Schölmerich, J., Rosales, A. M., CARLSSON, G., Borner, M., Boussard, B., Schmiegel, W."Irinotecan combined or alternated with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid versus the Mayo Clinic regimen in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer". Oncology Reports 13.4 (2005): 681-688.
Chicago
Graeven, U., Ridwelski, K., Artandi, M., Espana, P., Schölmerich, J., Rosales, A. M., CARLSSON, G., Borner, M., Boussard, B., Schmiegel, W."Irinotecan combined or alternated with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid versus the Mayo Clinic regimen in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer". Oncology Reports 13, no. 4 (2005): 681-688. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.13.4.681