Expression of cell proliferating genes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer by immunohistochemistry and cDNA profiling
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 1, 2005 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.13.5.837
- Pages: 837-846
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Abstract
Thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) is a key enzyme involved in the synthesis of DNA precursors and thus, cell proliferation-dependent. Antibodies against TK1 have provided attractive tools for cancer diagnosis. Expression of TK1 in 158 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with 59 adenocarcinoma (AC) and 99 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was determined by anti-TK1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) 1E3 (AC, n=50; SCC, n=70). Parallel tumor sections were stained for Ki-67 (MIB-1), and TK1 expression was also investigated with anti-TK1 chicken IgY Ab (AC, n=9; SCC, n=29; normal lung tissues, n=10). In one AC and one SCC patient, gene profiling was done by cDNA array. Using the mAb 1E3, a significantly higher TK1 labeling index (LI) of AC patients was found (68%) compared to the LI of Ki-67 (36%). This difference was due to a significantly higher TK1 LI of tumor stage II and grade 2. Although no difference in the LI of TK1 and Ki-67 of SCC patients was found (54 vs. 53%), significantly higher TK1 LI of SCC patients of tumor grade 1 was found. Using the anti-TK1 IgY Ab, a higher TK1 LI of AC patients (78%) and SCC patients (66%) was found compared to staining with mAb 1E3 (68 vs. 54%), but it was not significantly different. Samples stained only for TK1 represented mostly tumor stages I and II and grades 1 and 2 of both AC and SCC. AC patients whose samples stained only for Ki-67 were found to be in stage I and grade 1. cDNA profiling showed that the expression of BRCA1, cyclin B1 and cdc2p34 was higher in AC compared to SCC, while the expression of IGFBP-3 and EGFR was higher in SCC. TK1 is apparently a more reliable marker in AC patients than Ki-67. However, a combination of the two markers may help identify patients of different stages and grades more efficiently, and cyclin/kinase complexes and growth factors/receptors may be useful markers in distinguishing AC from SCC.