4-hexylresorcinol stimulates the differentiation of SCC-9 cells through the suppression of E2F2, E2F3 and Sp3 expression and the promotion of Sp1 expression

  • Authors:
    • Seong-Gon Kim
    • An-Sook Kim
    • Jae-Hwan Jeong
    • Je-Yong Choi
    • HaeYong Kweon
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 1, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1845
  • Pages: 677-681
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The dormancy-inducing factors of bacteria inhibit tumor cell growth. In the present study, we evaluated the antitumor effects of the dormancy-inducing factor 4-hexylresorcinol (4-HR) using real-time cell electronic sensing (RT-CES) in SCC-9 cells (tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells). Treatment with 4-HR suppressed the growth of SCC-9 cells in a dose-dependent manner. We used a DNA microarray to identify genes that showed a significant change in expression upon 4-HR administration in SCC-9 cells. Among the differentially expressed genes, the protein expression of several cell proliferation related factors, including E2F1, E2F2, E2F3, E2F4, E2F5, E2F6, Sp1 and Sp3, were determined by western blot analyses. Treatment with 4-HR strongly suppressed E2F2 and slightly suppressed E2F3 but did not change the expression of E2F1, E2F4, E2F5 and E2F6 relative to no treatment. Furthermore, 4-HR increased Sp1 expression in a dose-dependent manner and decreased Sp3 expression. Therefore, the ratio of Sp1 to Sp3, an important driving force of epithelial cell differentiation, was drastically increased. Consistent with this observation, 4-HR increased the expression of the epithelial cell differentiation markers involucrin and keratin 10. Together, our results indicate that 4-HR induces the differentiation of SCC-9 via the modulation of the E2F-mediated signaling pathway.

Introduction

The signaling pathways related to cell differentiation and senescence do not function properly in malignant tumor cells. As a result, tumor cells exhibit uncontrolled and invasive growth. Differentiation therapy is one emerging technique for the treatment of malignant cancer (1). Tumor cells originate from normal cells and many different carcinogenic stimuli can contribute to the development of cancer. Several key genes responsible for regulating apoptosis or senescence may undergo loss of function mutations in various tumors, particularly oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) (2). The main objectives of differentiation therapy may be achieved by the bypassing the mutated pathway, thus tipping the balance from carcinogenesis to terminal differentiation, or rescuing the senescence machinery.

E2F overexpression in squamous cell carcinoma cells results in aberrant proliferation and the suppression of the squamous differentiation program (3,4). E2F transcription factors promote the expression of genes related to DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression, resulting in cell proliferation (5,6). An increase in E2F activity is often associated with inappropriate cell proliferation and/or apoptosis (7), whereas a decrease in E2F activity is generally associated with a reduction in the proliferation capacity of cells (8). The deregulation of E2F activity contributes to carcinogenesis (9). E2Fs are involved in the differentiation of many cell types, such as myocytes (10), megakaryocytes (11), and adipocytes (12). The specific factor (Sp)1 to Sp3 ratio has been recognized as an important driving force of epithelial cell differentiation (1). Dysregulation of the expression of these factors or the change of the relative Sp1 and Sp3 expression levels result in dysregulated cell proliferation and differentiation (1). The direct downregulation of E2F and upregulation of Sp1 increases the expression of differentiation specific markers such as transglutaminase-1 and involucrin (1). Therefore, the expression of E2F factors and the ratio of Sp1 to Sp3 expression are important parameters determining the epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation.

The non-isoprenoid lipid is found in a wide range of plant and bacterial species. These lipids exert non-specific antioxidant and antimutagenic effects, and can regulate cell proliferation (13). Chemical analogs of these lipids have exhibited anticancer effects in animal models of colon (14), lung (15), and pancreatic tumors (16). 4-hexylresorcinol (4-HR) is also non-isoprenoid lipid. According to recent reports, 4-HR inhibits the transglutaminase-2 and NF-κB pathways (17,18), and 4-HR also shows a synergistic effect with cisplatin in KB cells (17,18). Interestingly, the cancer cells that survived 4-HR administration were less active and morphologically differentiated than the active proliferating control (data not shown). These findings suggest the possibility that 4-HR may induce differentiation in tumor cells. We hypothesize that 4-HR induces the differentiation of tumor cells through the control of cell cycle-related genes like E2F transcription factors.

The objectives of this study were: i) to evaluate of the effect of 4-HR on E2F signaling pathway on OSCC cells, and ii) to evaluate the level of expression of differentiation markers in OSCC cells after the administration of 4-HR.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Cell line SCC-9 cells (human tongue carcinoma; ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA) were maintained in monolayer cultures in DMEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum containing L-glutamine, vitamins (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY, USA), and penicillin-streptomycin (Flow Laboratories, Rockville, MD, USA). The cells were incubated in a mixture of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37°C. The cultures were maintained for no longer than 12 weeks after recovery from frozen stocks.

Real-time cell electronic sensing (RT-CES)

RT-CES is a measurement of impedance in a gold-plated culture dish. Because the cellular membrane is composed of lipid bilayer, increased cellular growth increases the impedance. The label-free detection of cell growth via RT-CES was conducted using an xCELLigence® system (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) and special gold-plated 96-well culture dishes in which the SCC-9 cells were grown. 4-HR was added at a concentration of 1, 5 or 10 μg/ml to each well 20 h following the initial seeding. No 4-HR was added in the control wells. The cell index values derived from the measured impedance were determined every hour for 4 days.

Western blot analysis

Whole cells were lysed in ProteoJET™ Mammalian Cell Lysis Reagent (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). Proteins were separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. Blots were blocked with 5% skim milk powder in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris-HCl, 137 mM NaCl, pH 7.6) containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T buffer) for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Western blot analyses were performed with anti-E2F1 (Abcam Inc. Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-E2F2 (Abcam Inc.), anti-E2F3 (Abcam Inc.), anti-E2F4 (Abcam Inc.), anti-E2F5 (Abcam Inc.), anti-E2F6 (Abcam Inc.), anti-Sp1 (Abcam Inc.), anti-Sp3 (Abcam Inc.), anti-keratin 10 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-involucrin (SantaCruz Biotechnology), and anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich Inc.) antibodies. Primary antibodies were added to the TBS-T buffer at a 1:1000 dilution and incubated for 90 min at RT prior to incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h at room temperature. The proteins were detected using a chemiluminescence detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The relative expression ratio of Sp1 to Sp3 was determined using Image Lab software (Bio-Rad).

DNA microarray analysis, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR), and fluorescent immunocytochemistry

DNA microarray analysis was performed by Genomic Tree Co. (Daejeon, Korea) using Agilent human whole-genome 4×44K chips (Santa Clara, CA). DNA microarray analysis was conducted using a previously published method (19). SCC-9 cells were treated with or without 4-HR (10 μg/ml) for 12 h, and total RNA was then extracted from the cells using TRI Reagent® as recommended by the manufacturer (Molecular Research Center Inc., Cincinnati, OH).

Keratin 10 and involucrin antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology for fluorescence immunocytochemistry analysis. Fluorescence immunocytochemistry was conducted using a previously published method (17). 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was used to stain nuclei.

For the Q-PCR analysis, SCC-9 cells were treated for 12 h with 0, 1, 5 or 10 μg/ml 4-HR. Total RNA (1 μg) was used as template for first-strand DNA synthesis using the ImProm-II Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The RT-PCR protocol and primers used to amplify involucrin and keratin 10 were published previously (20,21).

Results

4-HR decreased E2F2, E2F3, and Sp3 expression and increased Sp1 expression

In previous studies, we found that 4-HR has anti-tumor effects on several cancer cell lines (17,18). In this study, the anti-proliferative effect of 4-HR on SCC-9 cells observed in continuous RT-CES-based assays (Fig. 1). The growth of the SCC-9 cells slowed following the addition of 4-HR. The addition of 10 μg/ml 4-HR induced a prominent inhibitory effect, as determined by the observed decline in the growth curve (yellow) (Fig. 1). The 4-HR induced growth inhibition was dose-dependent.

To identify the target genes of 4-HR, a DNA microarray comparing 4-HR treated and untreated cells was performed, and differentially expressed genes were selected for further analysis (Table I). As shown in Fig. 1 and Table I, 4-HR decreased the levels of E2F2 and E2F3 expression. As 4-HR concentrations increased from 1 to 10 μg/ml, E2F2 expression was decreased (Fig. 2). The level of E2F3 expression was also decreased in 4-HR treated cells compared to the untreated control (Fig. 2). There was no significant difference in the expression of any other E2F transcription factors; E2F1, E2F4, E2F5, and E2F6 expression were all similar in the 4-HR treated cells and the untreated control cells.

Table I

The results of DNA microarray.a

Table I

The results of DNA microarray.a

TITLEGenBankFold-ratio
E2F2NM_0040910.428
E2F3NM_0019490.507
Sp1NM_1384731.498
Sp3BX6488570.464
InvolucrinNM_0055473.176
Keratin 10NM_0004213.213
Keratin 13NM_0022742.718
Keratin 14NM_0005262.823
Keratin 16NM_0055572.635
Keratin 17NM_0004222.951
Keratin 18NM_0002242.806
Keratin 19NM_0022762.841

a To identify the target genes of 4-HR, a DNA microarray comparing 4-HR treated and untreated cells was performed.

With respect to Sp transcription factors, Sp1 expression was increased by 4-HR treatment (Fig. 3A). However, Sp3 expression was decreased. DNA microarray analysis also demonstrated a decreased in the level of Sp3 expression (Table I). As a result, the Sp1/Sp3 ratio was increased upon 4-HR treatment in a dose-dependent manner. The Sp1/Sp3 ratios were 0.88, 1.72, 2.70 and 19.95 in the untreated control and in cells treated with 1, 5 and 10 μg/ml 4-HR, respectively (Fig. 3B). These results indicate that 4-HR regulates E2F2 and E2F3 expression and the Sp1/Sp3 expression ratio in SCC-9 cells.

4-HR accelerates SCC-9 cell differentiation

We also investigated genes that were involved in the epithelial cell differentiation, as identified by DNA microarray analyses. DNA microarray analysis revealed that keratins and involucrin exhibited significantly higher expression at 12 h after 10 μg/ml of 4-HR administration (Table I). The increased expression of keratin 10 and involucrin mRNA was confirmed by RT-PCR (Fig. 4A). Increased expression of the keratin 10 and involucrin proteins was confirmed by western blot analysis (Fig. 4B) and immunocytochemistry (Figs. 5 and 6). These results indicate that 4-HR stimulates the expression of differentiation marker genes in SCC-9 cells.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that 4-HR suppressed growth (Fig. 1) and stimulated the expression of differentiation marker genes in SCC-9 cells (Fig. 4). The 4-HR-induced SCC-9 cell differentiation was mediated by the E2F signaling pathway. E2F2, E2F3, and Sp3 were suppressed by 4-HR (Figs. 2 and 3). The level of Sp1 expression was increased by 4-HR treatment (Fig. 3). Indeed, 4-HR increased the expression of the epithelial cell differentiation markers keratin 10 and involucrin. Taken together, these data show that 4-HR induced SCC-9 cell differentiation through the downregulation of E2F2 and upregulation of Sp1/Sp3 ratio.

Senescence is defined as a permanent cell cycle arrest induced by oncogene expression and it is an effective anti-cancer mechanism in vivo(2224). Therefore, treatments aiming to inhibit the uncontrolled growth of cancer cells while simultaneously restoring their normal differentiation program would be invaluable (1). To develop such ‘differentiation therapies’, it is important to find candidate drugs that can control the E2F signaling pathway.

Squamous epithelial cell differentiation is controlled by Sp1 and E2F (25). Sp1 can act as a differentiation activator and its activity is regulated by E2F (1). E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3 are expressed highly in human osteosarcoma cells, and a large number of genes with known role in development and differentiation are consequently deregulated (26). However, the inhibition of E2F alone or the introduction of Sp1 alone is not sufficient to reinstate squamous differentiation (1). In the present study, 4-HR was able to suppress E2F2 and E2F3 expression (Fig. 2). At the same time, Sp1 expression was increased, and Sp3 expression was decreased (Fig. 3A). The Sp1 to Sp3 ratio is important in the regulation of cell differentiation, and the increase in this ratio observed upon 4-HR treatment (Fig. 3) is consistent with the activation of tumor cell differentiation (1).

In keratinocytes, E2F inhibition is a prerequisite for differentiation, and E2Fs 1–5 are all able to suppress differentiation-specific markers (3,4). E2F suppresses multiple markers of squamous cell differentiation (3,27). E2F is also able to suppress the differentiation induced by multiple stimuli (3,27). Thus, E2F has the capacity to act as an important regulator of squamous cell differentiation. In this study, the increased expression of differentiation markers such as keratin 10 and involucrin was due in part to the combination of the inhibition of E2F2 and E2F3 and the upregulation of the Sp1/Sp3 ratio by 4-HR (Fig. 4). However, these observations were made at the cellular level, and it will be important to validate these results in vivo. To this end, systemic administration of 4-HR in xenografted mice has been performed, and the expression of differentiation markers in the xenografted tumor mass is currently under investigation (data not shown).

In conclusion, 4-HR stimulated the differentiation of SCC-9 cells, potentially through the suppression of the E2F signaling pathway.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen21 Program ( Center for Nutraceutical & Pharmaceutical Materials no. PJ009051), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

1 

Wong CF, Barnes LM, Dahler AL, et al: E2F suppression and Sp1 overexpression are sufficient to induce the differentiation-specific marker, transglutaminase type 1, in a squamous cell carcinoma cell line. Oncogene. 24:3525–3534. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Bruckman KC, Schönleben F, Qiu W, Woo VL and Su GH: Mutational analyses of the BRAF, KRAS, and PIK3CA genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 110:632–637. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Wong CF, Barnes LM, Dahler AL, et al: E2F modulates keratinocyte squamous differentiation: implications for E2F inhibition in squamous cell carcinoma. J Biol Chem. 278:28516–28522. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Wong CF, Barnes LM, Smith L, Popa C, Serewko-Auret MM and Saunders N: E2F6: a member of the E2F family that does not modulate squamous differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 324:497–503. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Polyak K, Kato JY, Solomon MJ, et al: p27Kip1, a cyclin-Cdk inhibitor, links transforming growth factor-beta and contact inhibition to cell cycle arrest. J Gene Dev. 8:9–22. 1994.

6 

DeGregori J, Kowalik T and Nevins JR: Cellular targets for activation by the E2F1 transcription factor include DNA synthesis- and G1/S-regulatory genes. Mol Cell Biol. 15:4215–4224. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

7 

DeGregori J, Leone G, Miron A, Jakoi L and Nevins JR: Distinct roles for E2F proteins in cell growth control and apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:7245–7250. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Wu L, Timmers C, Maiti B, et al: The E2F1-3 transcription factors are essential for cellular proliferation. Nature. 414:457–462. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Wu Z, Zheng S and Yu Q: The E2F family and the role of E2F1 in apoptosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 41:2389–2397. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Wang J, Helin K, Jin P and Nadal-Ginard B: Inhibition of in vitro myogenic differentiation by cellular transcription factor E2F1. Cell Growth Differ. 6:1299–1306. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Guy CT, Zhou W, Kaufman S and Robinson MO: E2F-1 blocks terminal differentiation and causes proliferation in transgenic megakaryocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 16:685–693. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Fajas L, Landsberg RL, Huss-Garcia Y, Sardet C, Lees JA and Auwerx J: E2Fs regulate adipocyte differentiation. Dev Cell. 3:39–49. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kozubek A and Tyman JHP: Resorcinolic lipids, the natural non-isoprenoid phenolic amphiphiles and their biological activity. Chem Rev. 99:1–25. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Mutoh M, Takahashi M, Fukuda K, et al: Suppression of cyclooxygenase-2 promoter-dependent transcription activity in colon cancer cells by chemopreventive agents with a resorcin-type structure. Carcinogenesis. 21:959–963. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Hasegawa R, Furukawa F, Toyoda K, et al: Inhibitory effect of antioxidants on N-bis(2-hydroxypropyl)nitrosamine-induced lung carcinogenesis in rats. Jpn J Cancer Res. 81:871–877. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Maruyama H, Amamura T, Nakae D, et al: Effect of catechol and its analogs on pancreatic carcinogenesis initiated by N-nitrosobis(2-oxopropyl)amine in Syrian hamsters. Carcinogenesis. 12:1331–1334. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Kim SG, Jeong JH, Park YW, et al: 4-Hexylresorcinol inhibits transglutaminase-2 activity and has synergistic effects along with cisplatin in KB cells. Oncol Rep. 25:1597–1602. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Kim SG, Lee SW, Park YW, Jeong JH and Choi JY: 4-hexylresorcinol inhibits NF-κB phosphorylation and has a synergistic effect with cisplatin in KB cells. Oncol Rep. 26:1527–1532. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kim JY, Choi JY, Jeong JH, et al: Low molecular weight silk fibroin increases alkaline phosphatase and type I collagen expression in MG63 cells. BMB Rep. 43:52–56. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Trollinger DR, Cascio WE and Lemasters JJ: Selective loading of Rhod 2 into mitochondria shows mitochondrial Ca2+ transients during the contractile cycle in adult rabbit cardiac myocytes. Biochem Biophy Res Commun. 236:738–742. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Wagenblast J, Baghi M, Arnoldner C, et al: Effect of bortezomib and cetuximab in EGF-stimulated HNSCC. Anticancer Res. 28:2239–2243. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Braig M, Lee S, Loddenkemper C, et al: Oncogene-induced senescence as an initial barrier in lymphoma development. Nature. 436:660–665. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Chen Z, Trotman LC, Shaffer D, et al: Crucial role of p53-dependent cellular senescence in suppression of Pten-deficient tumorigenesis. Nature. 436:725–730. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LC, Soengas MS, et al: BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi. Nature. 436:720–724. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Hazar-Rethinam M, Cameron SR, Dahler AL, et al: Loss of E2F7 expression is an early event in squamous differentiation and causes derepression of the key differentiation activator Sp1. J Invest Dermatol. 131:1077–1084. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Muller H, Bracken AP, Vernell R, et al: E2Fs regulate the expression of genes involved in differentiation, development, proliferation, and apoptosis. Genes Dev. 15:267–285. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Dicker AJ, Popa C, Dahler AL, et al: E2F-1 induces proliferation-specific genes and suppresses squamous differentiation-specific genes in human epidermal keratinocytes. Oncogene. 19:2887–2894. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August 2012
Volume 28 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kim S, Kim A, Jeong J, Choi J and Kweon H: 4-hexylresorcinol stimulates the differentiation of SCC-9 cells through the suppression of E2F2, E2F3 and Sp3 expression and the promotion of Sp1 expression. Oncol Rep 28: 677-681, 2012.
APA
Kim, S., Kim, A., Jeong, J., Choi, J., & Kweon, H. (2012). 4-hexylresorcinol stimulates the differentiation of SCC-9 cells through the suppression of E2F2, E2F3 and Sp3 expression and the promotion of Sp1 expression. Oncology Reports, 28, 677-681. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1845
MLA
Kim, S., Kim, A., Jeong, J., Choi, J., Kweon, H."4-hexylresorcinol stimulates the differentiation of SCC-9 cells through the suppression of E2F2, E2F3 and Sp3 expression and the promotion of Sp1 expression". Oncology Reports 28.2 (2012): 677-681.
Chicago
Kim, S., Kim, A., Jeong, J., Choi, J., Kweon, H."4-hexylresorcinol stimulates the differentiation of SCC-9 cells through the suppression of E2F2, E2F3 and Sp3 expression and the promotion of Sp1 expression". Oncology Reports 28, no. 2 (2012): 677-681. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1845