Efficient inhibition of ovarian cancer by recombinant CXC chemokine ligand 10 delivered by novel biodegradable cationic heparin-polyethyleneimine nanogels

  • Authors:
    • Fan Yang
    • Malin Gou
    • Hongxin Deng
    • Tao Yi
    • Qian Zhong
    • Yuquan Wei
    • Xia Zhao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 6, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1853
  • Pages: 668-676
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Currently, great interest is focused on the anti-neoplastic effects of CXC chemokine ligand 10 (IP-10/CXCL10). IP-10 has shown significant antitumor and anti-metastatic properties via immunological, antiangiogenic and anti-neoplastic mechanisms. However, very few studies on the antitumor activity of IP-10 in human ovarian cancer have been reported. The use of polymeric nanoparticles to deliver functional genes intraperitoneally holds much promise as an effective therapy for ovarian cancer. In our study, a recombinant plasmid expressing IP-10 (pVITRO-IP-10) was constructed, and biodegradable cationic heparin-polyethyleneimine (HPEI) nanogels were prepared to deliver pVITRO-IP-10 into SKOV3 human ovarian cancer cells. Transfection efficiency was detected by expression profiling of green fluorescent protein. The expression of IP-10 was determined using RT-PCR and western blot analysis. In vitro, cell proliferation was evaluated by MTT assay. Apoptosis was examined by Hoechst33258/PI staining and flow cytometry assays. The effect on the inhibition of angiogenesis was evaluated by tube formation assay using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Moreover, a SKOV3 intraperitoneal ovarian carcinomatosis model was established to investigate the antitumor activity of HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 complexes in nude mice. Tumor weights were evaluated during the treatment course. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were evaluated by Ki-67 immunochemical staining and TUNEL assay, and the antiangiogenic effect of pVITRO-IP-10 was assessed by CD31 immunochemical staining and alginate-encapsulated tumor cell assay. pVITRO-IP-10 was efficiently transfected into SKOV3 cells by HPEI nanogels. Intraperitoneal administration of HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 complexes led to effective growth inhibition of ovarian cancer, in which tumor weight decreased by ~69.92% in the treatment group compared with that in the empty vector control group. Meanwhile, decreased cell proliferation, increased tumor cell apoptosis and reduction in angiogenesis were observed in the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 group compared with those in the control groups. These results indicated that HPEI nanogel delivery of pVITRO-IP-10 may be of value in the treatment against human ovarian cancer.

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common and lethal gynecologic neoplasm, and presently ranks fifth in causing female cancer-related mortality (1). The overall 5-year relative survival rate is no more than 50% (2). Due to its few and imperceptible early symptoms, ovarian cancer is mostly at advanced stage during the initial diagnosis. Although patients may initially respond to the combination treatment of surgical and chemical therapies, and various new chemotherapeutics have been developed for the treatment of ovarian cancer, most of the patients will inevitably die from relapse and the development of chemotherapy-resistant recurrence (3). Drug resistance and severe side effects remain unavoidable obstacles for chemotherapeutic approaches. Development of new approaches to overcome the therapeutic dilemma is of great urgency.

Interferon γ-inducible protein of 10 kDa (IP-10/CXCL10), a member of the non-ELR-CXC chemokine superfamily, is known to a highly inducible chemoattractant binding to the CXCR3 chemokine receptor (4,5). According to present studies, IP-10 has been demonstrated to be a pleiotropic molecule eliciting potent biological effects, including stimulation of monocytes, natural killer (NK) cells and T-cell, regulation of T-cell and bone marrow progenitor maturation, modulation of adhesion molecule expression as well as inhibition of angiogenesis (6). It has also been reported that IP-10 may inhibit human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumorigenesis and spontaneous metastases (7). Currently, much interest is focused on the anti-neoplastic effects of IP-10 (8). IP-10 has been found to possess anti-tumor and anti-metastatic properties by immunological, antiangiogenic and anti-neoplastic mechanisms (9,10). In the present study, we constructed this recombinant plasmid expressing IP-10 (pVITRO-IP-10) to test its antitumor effect on ovarian cancer.

In addition, the delivery system is a crucial factor affecting the effectiveness of therapy for ovarian cancer. Polyethyleneimine (PEI) has emerged as one of the most effective nonviral gene carrier agent. Currently, commercial PEI25K (25 kg/mol) is widely considered to be the gold standard for assessing the transfection efficiency of new polymer-based gene carriers (11,12). However, PEI has the shortcoming of inducing marked aggregation of erythrocytes and hemolysis (13,14). Moreover, PEI whose transfection efficiency comes with relatively high cytotoxicity is not biodegradable. In our previous study, PEI2K was chemically conjugated with heparin to form a novel biodegradable cationic nanogel, named HPEI. The novel biodegradable cationic HPEI nanogels were then used to effectively deliver a plasmid expressing vesicular stomatitis virus matrix protein (pVSVMP) into C-26 cells in vitro and in vivo, where the complex efficiently suppressed the growth of abdominal and pulmonary metastases in C-26 colon carcinomas in BALB/c mice (15). HPEI nanogels have also been used to transfect the novel FILIP1LDC103-p gene into SKOV3 cells efficiently (16). In the present study, biodegradable cationic HPEI nanogels were used as gene carriers to deliver a recombinant plasmid encoding IP-10 to treat a SKOV3 intraperitoneal ovarian carcinomatosis in nude mice, potential enhanced effect of IP-10 on ovarian cancer was expected.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Human epithelial serous cystadenocarcinoma SKOV3 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA) and cultured in DMEM (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) culture medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Cells were incubated in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C and passaged every 4 days at a split ratio of 1:3.

HUVECs were isolated from human umbilical vein vascular wall as described previously (17). Briefly, the human umbilical vein vascular wall was digested with collagenase IV at 37°C for 10 min, and the homogenate was centrifuged at 750 g for 10 min. Cells were suspended and seeded on fibronectin-coated plates and cultured in Earle's salts medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS).

Preparation of plasmids

A dual promoter plasmid, pVITRO2-neo-mcs (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) was utilized to express IP-10 genes, which is a common expression vector in gene therapy (18). The recombinant plasmid was named pVITRO-IP-10. The pVITRO2-neo-mcs plasmid cDNA without IP-10 was used as the empty-vector control (hereafter called E-p). The plasmids were purified using Qiagen Endo-free Giga kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions (19).

HPEI preparation and plasmid transfection

Biodegradable HPEI nanogels were synthesized as previously described (15). In brief, 0.05 g of heparin was first dissolved in 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffering agent (100 ml, 50 mM); 0.02 g of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) and 0.03 g of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were subsequently added to the solution to activate heparin's carboxylic acid groups. After 20 ml of PEI2K solution (7.5 mg/ml) was dropped into the solution, the reaction was carried out at room temperature overnight. The resulting HPEI nanogels were then dialyzed in double-distilled water for 3 days. Later, HPEI nanogels were filtered using a syringe filter, then adjusted to a final concentration of 1.0 mg/ml and stored at 4°C.

SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells (2.0×105) were grown on 6-well plates in DMEM medium and cultured for 24 h. Twenty micrograms of HPEI and 2 μg of pVITRO-IP-10 was diluted in 1 ml of DMEM medium without antibiotic or serum, and then combined at a ratio of 10:1. The combinations were transfected to cells in triplicate and incubated overnight to 80% confluence. Meanwhile, the medium alone and HPEI nanogels alone were used as control agents. After 4–6 h, the medium was replaced by 2 ml of DMEM medium with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. After 48 h of incubation, the cells and supernatants were collected for further assay.

Detection of transfection efficiency

In order to evaluate the transfection efficiency of HPEI in vitro, 2 μg of green fluorescent protein (GFP) plasmid was encapsulated with HPEI to transfect SKOV3 cells. The GFP expression profile was detected as described in our previous studies (20). In brief, SKOV3 cells (1×105 cells/well) were seeded on 6-well plates. Before transfection, the DMEM medium in each well was replaced with 0.8 ml of fresh serum-free medium, and then the HPEI:GFP complex was added and left to mix in serum-free medium at 37°C overnight. Then the complete DMEM medium was added, and the plate was maintained at 37°C for 48 h, after which we observed green fluorescence expression with a fluorescence inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i, Japan). The transfection efficiency was determined based on the percentage of cells expressing GFP. The number of GFP-expressing cells divided by the total cell quantity under the microscope was defined as the transfection efficiency. Cell counting was performed randomly in the microscopic observation scope under magnifications ×10 with 3 repeats. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

RT-PCR

The IP-10 primers were designed based on their cDNA sequences, upstream IP-10 primer: 5′-ATGAATCAAACTGCC ATTCTG-3′; and downstream IP-10 primer: 5′-TTAAGGAGA TCTTTTAGACCTTTCC-3′.

Total RNA was purified using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. RT-PCR was performed as follows: incubation at 50°C for 40 min and denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by a standard PCR regime of 94°C for 30 sec 53°C (IP-10) for 30 sec, and 72°C for 40 sec (30 cycles). Each RT-PCR product (5 μl) was analyzed by agarose gel (1.5%) electrophoresis. The housekeeping gene GAPDH served as the internal control. The density of PCR bands was quantified by Quantity One software.

Western blot analysis

Western blot analysis was employed to determine the expression level of IP-10 in vitro and in vivo. Cells or tumor tissue were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM NaF, and 1 mM Na3VO4, supplemented with proteinase inhibitor (1 mM cocktail plus 1 mM PMSF, Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The lysed product was then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm, 4°C for 30 min. Protein concentrations were measured with Bio-Rad protein assay kits (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Equal amounts of protein (40 μg) were loaded onto a 12% SDS-PAGE gel for electrophoresis and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). After being blocked in 5% skim milk for 1 h, the membranes were incubated with anti-IP-10 antibody (1:100 dilution, Abcam 9807) at 4°C overnight. The membranes were then incubated with goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody at 1:5,000 dilution (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) in PBS with Tween-20 for 1 h. Targeted protein bands were detected by the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Pierce Biotech Inc., Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. GAPDH served as the protein loading control. Bands were analyzed using Quantity One 4.52 software (Bio-Rad).

Assessment of proliferation in vitro

The effect of pVITRO-IP-10 on cell proliferation was measured by MTT assay (21). SKOV3 transfection procedure was as mentioned above, then 10 ml of 5 mg/ml MTT (pH 4.7) was added to each well, and the cells were incubated for another 4 h. The supernatant was then removed; 100 ml DMSO/well was added followed by shaking for 15 min. Absorbance at 490 nm was measured with a micro-plate reader. Independent experiments were performed in triplicate. Inhibition of cell proliferation (%) was assessed using the formula: cell inhibition (%) = (1-A490 of treated cells/A490 of control cells) × 100%.

Assessment of apoptosis in vitro

Cell apoptosis was analyzed by Hoechst 33258 staining. Briefly, 48 h after transfection, cells were immersed in 0.5 ml of methanol for 15 min, followed by two PBS rinses. Then the cells were stained with 1 μg/ml Hoechst 33258 compounds in a dark chamber at room temperature for 10 min and again rinsed two times with PBS, then stained with 1× PI 500 μl for 10 min and rinsed two times with PBS again. Cells were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy using excitation and emission wavelengths of 350 and 460 nm, respectively (22).

Quantitative evaluation of cellular apoptosis was performed by flow cytometric analysis. Briefly, after processing in 6-well plates as described above, the floated cells were discarded while the attached cells were trypsinized and thereafter washed twice with cold PBS. Cells were resuspended in prediluted binding buffer and stained with propidium iodide (10 μg/ml, BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA) for 10 min in the dark at room temperature, and the mixtures were immediately analyzed by flow cytometry (23).

Assessment of antiangiogenesis in vitro

Antiangiogenesis effect of pVITRO-IP-10 was evaluated by tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) (24,25). HUVEC were cultured as described above. Tube formation assay is reported as an effectively model for assessment of antiangiogenesis in vitro. Briefly, Matrigel was incubate on ice at 4°C overnight. Pre-cooled matrigel (150 μl) was transfered to a 48-well plate on ice and allowed to solidify at 37°C for 1 h. HUVEC were counted and diluted to 4×105 cells/ml in cell culture media. The molecules were diluted to required concentrations in cell culture media. The diluted HUVEC were transfer to wells of a 96-well plate. Respective diluted molecules were added to protein solution by pipetting them up and down three times, then ensuring the final concentration as 1× mix. The mixture (200 μl) was transfered to a 48-well plate and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 3 to 30 h. Endothelial tube size and numbers were recorded under a microscope and photograph. The increase or decrease in the formation of tubes in the test wells as compared to control wells indicated whether the molecule was angiogenic or anti-angiogenic.

Tumor xenograft model and animal treatment

All animal research procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan University (Chengdu, China). Female athymic BALB/c nude mice, 6–8 weeks old, were used to establish an intraperitoneal carcinomatosis model using a previously-established method with some modifications (26). In brief, 5×106 SKOV3 cells in 100 μl DMEM medium (free of serum and antibiotics) were injected subcutaneously into the dorsal sides of 6 mice. When the diameter of the resulting subcutaneous tumors reached ~10 mm, the tumor nodes were collected and minced into tiny particles (<1 mm3) by sterile stainless screen cloth. The tumor particles were then resuspended by serum-free medium to a final volume of 15 ml, and 30 mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 0.5 ml of the mixture. Mice were assigned randomly to one of the following groups (five per group): a) untreated, 100 ml of 5% glucose solution; b) HPEI, 50 ml of HPEI in 50 ml of 5% glucose solution; c) HPEI±E-p, 5 μg of pVITRO2-neo-mcs of HPEI in 50 ml of 5% glucose solution; and (d) HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10, 5 μg of pVITRO-IP-10 and 50 ml of HPEI in 50 ml of 5% glucose solution; intraperitoneal administration was initiated 5 days after inoculation. The HPEI/DNA complexes were prepared at room temperature before administration. The mice received therapy every 3 days and were sacrificed after 12 treatments. Intraperitoneal tumors were resected and weighed immediately to assess antitumoral efficacy.

Histological analysis

Each dissected tumor node group was divided into two parts. One was fixed in 10% formalin for 48 h and then embedded in paraffin. The other was stored at −80°C for frozen section and protein extraction. Sections (3–5 μm) were made of the paraffin-embedded tumors of each group. Then the paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and examined by an experienced pathologist using light microscopy to confirm histology. Immunohistochemistry staining of IP-10, and Ki67 was performed as described previously (27). Briefly, deparaffinized tumor sections were immersed in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and then heated in an autoclave for 5 min in saturated steam for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched in 3% H2O2 for 10 min, and the non-specific binding sites of reagents were subsequently blocked with homeotypic nonimmunoglobulin of the secondary antibody at 37°C for 20 min. Then tumor sections were incubated with the primary antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) at 4°C overnight. Tumor sections were incubated with the biotinylated secondary antibody at 37°C for 40 min, followed by sequential incubation with a streptavidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase complex for 40 min at 37°C. Colorimetric detection was performed with diaminobenzidine.

TUNEL assay for apoptotic cells

TUNEL staining was performed to analyze apoptotic cells in tumor tissues using apoptotic cell kits according to the manufacturer's protocol (Promega, Madison, WI) (16). The apoptosis index was calculated as the average percentage of green fluorescence-positive cells in 10 random fields from different sections at magnification ×400.

Alginate-encapsulated tumor cell assay

To explore inhibition of angiogenesis, we performed an alginate-encapsulation assay. Briefly, SKOV3 cells were resuspended in a 1.5% solution of alginate (Sigma) and added dropwise into a solution of 250 mM CaCl2; an alginate bead was formed containing 1×105 cells. Two beads were then implanted subcutaneously in the backs of every nude mouse. Eighteen mice were then grouped and treated as described earlier. Treatment was initiated on the same day the beads were implanted. After two weeks, mice were injected intravenously with 0.2 ml of a 50 mg/kg fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran (Sigma) solution. Alginate beads were photographed after being exposed surgically and then rapidly removed 20 min after FITC-dextran injection. The uptake of FITC-dextran was measured as described by Hoffmann et al(28).

Microvessel density assay

The frozen tumor masses stored in liquid nitrogen were sliced into 5-μm sections for quantification of microvessel density (MVD) with CD31 staining by the immunohistochemical ABC method, following the protocol of the manufacturer with a few modifications. Briefly, after fixing frozen sections in cold acetone for 20 min, rabbit serum was used in the blocking steps. Subsequently, endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 0.3% H2O2. Sections were then incubated in monoclonal CD31 primary antibody of rat anti-mouse PECAM-1 diluted 1:400 overnight at 4°C. After incubating and washing in PBS, sections were incubated in biotinylated rabbit anti-rat IgG (secondary antibody, 1:100 dilution) at 37°C for 40 min. The sections were then treated with streptavidin-biotin reagents, resulting in the brown staining of microvessel endothelial cells. Then MVD was determined by examining vascular hot spots as described previously (29). Three vascular tumor areas without necrosis were selected at high magnification (x200), and the three values were averaged for each sample.

Evaluation of possible adverse effects

For mice treated with pVITRO-IP-10 DNA complex, gross measures such as weight loss, diarrhea, toxic death, life span, behavior, and feeding were investigated in particular for potential signs of toxicity. Heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 3–5 μm were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and observed by two different experienced pathologists in a blinded manner.

Statistical analysis

All experimental data are expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons, was performed with SPSS software (version 15.0 for Windows). Dunnett's t-test (2-sided) was employed as needed. Statistical significance was determined by the log-rank test. Significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results

Transfection efficiency and expression of IP-10 in vitro and in vivo

The transfection efficiency of HPEI in vitro was tested by green fluorescent protein (GFP). The transfection efficiency, based on the percentage of cells expressing GFP, is ~48.8%±5.15, shown in Fig. 1A.

The in vitro expression of the IP-10 gene in transfected SKOV3 cells was confirmed using RT-PCR and western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 1B, the expression of IP-10 in SKOV3 cells transfected with HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 could be detected, whereas there was no expression of IP-10 in SKOV3 cells from the untreated, HPEI, or HPEI+E-p groups

To examine the expression of IP-10 in vivo, an intraperitoneal ovarian carcinoma model was established in nude mice, which were then treated with HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10, HPEI+E-p, HPEI, or 5% glucose. Tumors were collected for RT-PCR and western blotting on the third day after the final treatment. The level of IP-10 mRNA and expression of IP-10 protein were detected in tumor tissues from the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 group, whereas there was no expression in the HPEI, E-p, and 5% glucose groups (Fig. 1C). In addition, immunochemical staining of IP-10 in tumor tissues from the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 group also suggested positive expression, as shown in Fig. 1D.

Inhibition of proliferation and increased apoptosis induced by pVITRO-IP-10 in vitro

The effect of pVITRO-IP-10 on cell proliferation was measured by MTT assay. The inhibition rate of SKOV3 cell proliferation 72 h after transfection with HPEI reached 45.3% in pVITRO-IP-10 treated samples, while it is 21.7% in E-p treated samples, and 9.6% in samples treated only with HPEI, in comparison with untreated samples. Cell viability was significantly lower in the groups treated with pVITRO-IP-10 than in the other three control groups (untreated, HPEI alone, and E-p), as shown in Fig. 2A (p<0.05).

Hoechst 33258/PI staining was used to test the apoptosis. The pVITRO-IP-10 treated cells resulted in more morphological changes compared with controls. As shown in Fig. 2B, bright blue-fluorescent condensed nuclei (intact or fragmented), decreased cell volume, blebbing, condensation of nuclear chromatin, nuclear fragmentation, and apoptotic bodies were common in the pVITRO-IP-10 treated cells. Those cells also displayed prominent red fluorescence. However, these changes were less prominent, and slight bright blue or red fluorescence appeared in the untreated, HPEI alone, and E-p groups.

In addition, the number of apoptotic and non-apoptotic cells were quantitated by flow cytometric analysis. The results correlated strongly with those in the staining patterns observed with fluorescence microscopy. The percentage of apoptotic cells was significantly higher in the pVITRO-IP-10 samples (56.4%) compared with samples treated with E-p (22.3%), HPEI (11.8%), or untreated (5.1%) as shown in Fig. 2C.

Inhibition of angiogenesis in vitro

We tested the ability of IP-10 to inhibit endothelial cell activity in vitro using tube formation assay. Untreated HUVECs display a healthy tubular network formation. In the case of HUVECs treated by HPEI alone or HPEI+E-p supernatant, there was tubular network formation almost similar to that of the control. In the case of HUVECs treated with pVITRO-IP-10 supernatant, we found obvious inhibition of tubular network formation (Fig. 2D).

Inhibition of intraperitoneal ovarian cancer xenograft growth in nude mice

To evaluate the effect of HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 on suppressing ovarian cancer growth in vivo, we established an intraperitoneal xenograft model of human ovarian cancer. All intraperitoneal tumor nodules were collected carefully; each group with 5 mice. As shown in Fig. 3A, the average tumor weights were 1.33±0.41 (untreated), 1.43±0.29 (HPEI), 1.10±0.20 (HPEI+E-p), and 0.40±0.04 g (HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10), (p<0.01). It suggested that HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 reduced tumor weight by 69.92% compared with the controls (Fig. 3B).

Observation of toxicity

To determine potential side effects during treatment, we looked for signs of possible toxicity. No gross abnormalities were found regarding weight loss, feeding, or behavior in the treated groups. Furthermore, histologically, no apparent pathological differences were noted between the treated and control groups in the HE-stained organs, including heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney (Fig. 3C).

Inhibition of cell proliferation in vivo

To explore potential mechanisms underlying the antitumor effect of HPEI+ pVITRO-IP-10 in vivo, we performed Ki-67 immunohistochemistry to investigate whether the antitumor effect of HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 correlated with cell proliferation inhibition. The reduction of Ki-67 expression relative to the three control groups was obvious in the tumors of the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 treated groups. The Ki67-positive cells were 75.3±6.67 (untreated) vs. 71.34±6.49 (HPEI) vs. 68.5±4.50 (HPEI+E-p) vs. 20.94±3.51 (HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10) (p<0.05; Fig. 4A).

Figure 4

Inhibition of cell proliferation, suppression of angiogenesis and induction of cell apoptosis by pVITRO-IP-10 in vivo. (A) Ki-67 immunochemical staining was performed to detect the cell proliferation inhibition. The Ki67-positive cells were 75.3±6.67 (untreated) vs. 71.34±6.49 (HPEI) vs. 68.5±4.50 (HPEI + E-p) vs. 20.94±3.51 (HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10) vs. respectively. (B) The antiangiogenic effect of HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 was detected by CD31 immunochemical staining. This staining revealed a significant reduction of MVD in tumor tissues from the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 treated groups compared with the untreated, HPEI, and HPEI + E-p groups. The MVD were 27.91±1.67 (untreated) vs. 26.97±1.23 (HPEI) vs. 26.74±0.85 (HPEI + E-p) vs. 14.32±1.36 (HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10) vs. respectively. (C) Antiangiogenesis activity was also detected by the alginate-encapsulated tumor cell assay. There were fewer newborn blood vessels in the alginate bead nude mice treated with HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 than in those from the control groups. The FITC-dextran uptake were 5.62±0.46 μg/bead (untreated) vs. 5.49±0.45 μg/bead (HPEI) vs. 5.37±0.37 μg/bead (HPEI+E-p) vs. 2.99±0.16 μg/bead (HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10), respectively. Compared with the three control groups, the levels of FITC-dextran uptake were significantly lower in mice treated with HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10. (D) Apoptosis was detected by TUNEL assay. In tumor tissues, apoptotic cells were stained with bright green fluorescence, while normal live cells were stained by DAPI in bland blue. The TUNEL assay showed many apoptotic cells in the tumor sections of the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 groups, however, there were few such cells in the three control groups. The apoptotic index, the ratio of bright green-fluorescence cells to total cells, revealed that tumors in the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 groups had significantly more TUNEL-positive nuclei than tumors in the untreated, HPEI, or HPEI + E-p groups, apoptosis ratio was 5.79±1.67 (untreated) vs. 5.11±1.69 (HPEI) vs. 8.38±2.16 (HPEI+E-p) vs. 39.92±4.84 (HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10), which revealed that tumors in the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 groups had significantly more TUNEL-positive nuclei than tumors in the untreated, HPEI, or HPEI + E-p groups.

Suppression of angiogenesis in vivo

Frozen sections were stained by CD31 antibody to investigate the antiangiogenic effect of HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10. Angiogenesis in tumor tissues was evaluated by microvessel density (MVD) in different sections stained with an antibody reactive to CD31, which has high specific affinity for vascular endothelial cells. This staining revealed a significant reduction of MVD in tumor tissues from the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 treated groups compared with the untreated, HPEI, and HPEI+E-p groups. The MVD were 27.91±1.67 (untreated) vs. 26.97±1.23 (HPEI) vs. 26.74±0.85 (HPEI+E-p) vs. 14.32±1.36 (HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10) (p<0.01; Fig. 4B).

Antiangiogenesis activity was detected using the alginate-encapsulated tumor cell assay; there were fewer newborn blood vessels in alginate beads from nude mice treated with HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 than in those from the control groups. Moreover, compared with the three control groups, the levels of FITC-dextran uptake were significantly lower in mice treated with HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10. The FITC-dextran uptake were 5.62±0.46 (untreated) vs. 5.49±0.45 (HPEI) vs. 5.37±0.37 (HPEI+E-p) vs. 2.99±0.16 μg/bead (HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10) (p<0.01; Fig. 4C).

Induction of apoptosis in vivo

TUNEL assay was applied to test apoptotic cells in vivo. As described above, apoptotic cells were stained with bright green fluorescence, while normal live cells were stained by DAPI in bland blue. The TUNEL assay showed more apoptotic cells in the tumor sections of the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 groups, while there were few such cells in the three control groups. The apoptotic index, the ratio of bright green-fluorescence cells to total cells, revealed that tumors in the HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 groups had significantly more TUNEL-positive nuclei than tumors in the untreated, HPEI, or HPEI+E-p groups. Apoptosis ratio was 5.79±1.67 (untreated) vs. 5.11±1.69 (HPEI) vs. 8.38±2.16 (HPEI+E-p) vs. 39.92±4.84 (HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10) as shown in Fig. 4D.

Discussion

A previous study showed that growth of xenografted human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be suppressed by introducing IP-10 (7). IP-10 has been demonstrated to be a pleiotropic molecule eliciting potent biological effects, including stimulation of monocytes, natural killer (NK) cells and T-cell, regulation of T-cell and bone marrow progenitor maturation, modulation of adhesion molecule expression as well as inhibition of angiogenesis (6). However, the antitumoral efficacy of the IP-10 gene in human ovarian cancer is largely unknown. In the present study, we constructed a recombinant plasmid expressing IP-10 which was then used to effectively inhibit intraperitoneal xenograft growth of human ovarian cancer in nude mice, with biodegradable cationic HPEI nanogels as a novel delivery system. Treatment with HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 complexes in nude mice was found to have no detectable toxicity.

Although the exact mechanism of pVITRO-IP-10 antitumor activity remains to be determined, part of the answer may lie in increased induction of antiangiogenesis and apoptosis. This assumption is strongly supported by the result of our experiments. Firstly, inhibition of angiogenesis was found in the tumors treated with HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 compared with the control group. In this study, tube formation assay in vitro and CD31 staining, alginate-encapsulated tumor cell assay in vivo showed obvious inhibition of angiogenesis in HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 treatment compared with controls. Secondly, more apoptotic cells were found in the tumors treated with HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 than in control groups. In our study, the Hoechst/PI staining in vitro and the TUNEL assay in vivo suggested that pVITRO-IP-10 transfected by HPEI resulted in significant inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of cell apoptosis. Other agents, including soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (30), angiostatin (31), and endostatin (32,33) have also been reported to inhibit tumor angiogenesis, induce apoptosis, thus suppress tumor growth. The molecular mechanisms underlying the inhibition of angiogenesis, and thus the induction of apoptosis in tumor cells, have yet to be elucidated fully (34). Taken together, these previous findings support our hypothesis that the antitumor efficacy in the present study may result in part from the inhibition of angiogenesis and induction of apoptosis. These proposed mechanisms are persuasive, but further experiments in vitro and in vivo are required to resolve the relative contribution of the hypothesized mechanism.

In ovarian cancer, which is mainly limited in the abdominal cavity, systemic administration usually could not attain desired drug concentration at the tumor site. Compared with systemic administration, intraperitoneal administration of HPEI+pVITRO-IP-10 avoids the systemic toxicity and first pass effect (35), refrains from clearance through bonding with plasma protein or phagocytized by lymphocyte that was inevitable in cationic lipid-DNA complexes, and maintains high focal concentration of the drug in the area where it was topically applied.

Consequently, we may wonder whether transferring the IP-10 gene into ovarian cancer cells by a suitable delivery system could be an approach for treating ovarian cancer. Over the last decade, many other functional genes have been reported to effectively inhibit ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo(36,37). However, the lack of safe and efficient gene delivery approach is a major obstacle to the applications of gene treatments in clinical practice. Currently, delivery systems for gene transfer are generally classified as viral and non-viral vectors. Non-viral vectors have many advantages over viral vectors, such as calcium phosphate, liposome, and emerging chitosan (3843). In our study, a novel nonviral gene delivery system was developed based on PEI. In addition to the advantages of PEI, the delivery system resolved the transfection efficiency-dependent cytotoxicity and problems of non-biodegradability. The heparin conjugated PEI into biodegradable cationic nanogels were relatively stable in vitro and easy to degrade through enzymolysis and hydrolysis in vivo. As a natural polysaccharide, heparin is bio-compatible and non-toxic. Furthermore, it improves the biocompatibility of the nanogels. In our previous study, the transfection efficiency of HPEI was found to be comparable to that of PEI25k, but with less toxicity. Analyses of the erythrocyte aggregation and hemolysis showed that HPEI had better blood compatibility than PEI25K. Moreover, HPEI nanogels were stable in vitro and could be quickly degraded into the low-molecular weight chemical compound PEI and excreted in urine (15). We previously found that HPEI could effectively transfect plasmids into SKOV3 cells. Based on these advantages, HPEI nanogels were chosen to deliver a recombinant plasmid to evaluate the antitumor ability of IP-10, as well as the efficacy and safety of this delivery system.

In conclusion our study showed for the first time that the antitumor efficacy of a novel strategy of HPEI nanogel-delivered pVITRO-IP-10 could efficiently inhibit the growth of ovarian cancer both in vitro and in vivo. IP-10 as a potential angiogenesis inhibitor could efficiently inhibit the growth of xenografted ovarian cancer through inhibition of angiogenesis, inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and induction of tumor-cell apoptosis. Biodegradable cationic HPEI nanogels might also be used as a safe and effective delivery media. Hence, HPEI nanogel-delivered pVITRO-IP-10 may have a great potential in clinical practice against ovarian cancer in the future. However, more studies are required to further demonstrate the mechanisms involved.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China (2010CB529905, 2011CB910700), National Natural Science Foundation of China (0040215401068), and NIH81071861.

References

1 

Jermal A, Siegel R, Xu J and Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 60:277–300. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J and Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 59:225–249. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

DiSaia PJ and Creasman WT: Epithelial ovarian cancer. Clinical Gynecologic Oncology. 5th edition. 1997

4 

Farber J and Mig M: IP-10: CXC chemokines that target lymphocytes. J Leukoc Biol. 61:246–247. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Loetscher M, Loetscher P, Brass N, Meese E and Moser B: Lymphocyte-specific chemokine receptor CXCR3: regulation, chemokine binding and gene localization. Eur J Immunol. 28:3696–3705. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Neville LF, Mathiak G and Bagasra O: The immunobiology of interferon-gamma inducible protein 10 kD (IP-10): a novel, pleiotropic member of the CXC chemokine superfamily. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 8:207–219. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Douglas A, Arenberg A, Steven LK and Unkelfl PJ: Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 350:351–360. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Maru SV, Holloway KA, Flynn G, Lancashire CL, Loughlin AJ, Male DK and Romero IA: Chemokine production and chemokine receptor expression by human glioma cells: role of CXCL10 in tumour cell proliferation. J Neuroimmunol. 199:35–45. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Fujita M, Zhu X, Ueda R, Sasaki K, Kohanbash G, Kastenhuber ER, McDonald HA, Gibson GA, Watkins SC and Muthuswamy R: Effective immunotherapy against murine gliomas using type 1 polarizing dendritic cells - significant roles of CXCL10. Cancer Res. 69:1587–1595. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Strieter RM, Polverini PJ, Kunkel SL, et al: The functional role of the ELR motif in CXC chemokine mediated angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 270:348–357. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Boussif O, Lezoualc'h F, Zanta MA, et al: A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethylenimine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:7297–7301. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Lungwitz U, Breunig M, Blunk T and Gopferich A: Polyethylenimine-based non-viral gene delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 60:247–266. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Neu M, Fischer D and Kissel T: Recent advances in rational gene transfer vector design based on poly (ethyleneimine) and its derivatives. J Gene Med. 7:992–1009. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Kunath K, Von HA, Fischer D, et al: Low-molecular weight polyethyleneimine as a non-viral vector for DNA delivery: comparison of physicochemical properties, transfection efficiency and in vivo distribution with high-molecular-weight polyethyleneimine. J Control Release. 89:113–125. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Gou M, Men K, Zhang J, et al: Efficient inhibition of C-26 colon carcinoma by VSVMP gene delivered by biodegradable cationic nanogel derived from polyethyleneimine. ACS Nano. 4:5573–5584. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Chuan X, Ma LG, Tao Y, et al: Efficient inhibition of ovarian cancer by truncation mutant of FILIP1L gene delivered by novel biodegradable cationic heparin-polyethyleneimine nanogels. Hum Gene Ther. 22:1413–1422. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Baudin B, Bruneel A, Bosselut N and Vaubourdolle M: A protocol for isolation and culture of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Nat Protoc. 2:481–485. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Wen Y, Wang C, Ma T, Li Z, Zhou L, Mu B, Leng F, Shi H, Li Y and Wei Y: Immunotherapy targeting fibroblast activation protein inhibits tumor growth and increases survival in a murine colon cancer model. Cancer Sci. 101:2325–2332. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Qiaoyun S, Andrew T, Guyen N, Angell Y, et al: A combinatorial approach for targeted delivery using small molecules and reversible masking to bypass non-specific uptake in vivo. Gene Ther. 17:1085–1097. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Jen-Tsan C, Howard YC, Nancy NW, Dustin SC, Nina D and Patrick OB: Genome wide view of gene silencing by small interfering RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 11:6343–6346. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Selvakumaran M, Pisarcik DA, Bao R, Yeung AT and Hamilton TC: Enhanced cisplatin cytotoxicity by disturbing the nucleotide excision repair pathway in ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 63:1311–1316. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Xu GX, Zhong Y, Munir S, Yang BB, Tsang BK and Peng C: Nodal induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells via activin receptor-like kinase 7. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 89:5523–5534. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Lin XJ, Chen XC, Wei YQ, et al: Efficient inhibition of intraperitoneal human ovarian cancer growth and prolonged survival by gene transfer of vesicular stomatitis virus matrix protein in nude mice. Gynecol Oncol. 104:540–546. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Folkman J: Angiogenesis: an organizing principle for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 6:273–286. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Hillen F and Griffioen AW: Tumour vascularization: sprouting angiogenesis and beyond. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 26:489–502. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Lin XJ, Chen XC, Wang L, et al: Dynamic progression of an intraperitoneal xenograft model of human ovarian cancer and its potential for preclinical trials. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 26:467–474. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Sun C, Yi T, Song X, Li S, Qi X, Chen X, Lin H, He X, Li Z, Wei Y and Zhao X: Efficient inhibition of ovarian cancer by short hairpin RNA targeting claudin-3. Oncol Rep. 26:193–200. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Hoffmann J, Schirner M, Menrad A and Schneider MR: A highly sensitive model for quantification of in vivo tumor angiogenesis induced by alginate-encapsulated tumor cells. Cancer Res. 57:3847–3851. 1997.

29 

Fan Y, Li Z, Hong XD, et al: Efficient inhibition of ovarian cancer growth and prolonged survival by transfection with a novel pro-apoptotic gene, hPNAS-4, in a mouse model. Oncology. 75:137–144. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Takayama K, Ueno H, Nakanishi Y, et al: Suppression of tumor angiogenesis and growth by gene transfer of a soluble form of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor into a remote organ. Cancer Res. 60:2169–2177. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Yokoyama Y, Dhanabal M, Griffioen AW, Sukhatme VP and Ramakrishnan S: Synergy between angiostatin and endostatin: inhibition of ovarian cancer growth. Cancer Res. 60:2190–2196. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Herbst RS, Mullani NA, Davis DW, et al: Development of biologic markers of response and assessment of antiangiogenic activity in a clinical trial of human recombinant endostatin. J Clin Oncol. 20:3804–3814. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Schmidt NO, Ziu M, Carrabba G, et al: Antiangiogenic therapy by local intracerebral microinfusion improves treatment efficiency and survival in an orthotopic human glioblastoma model. Clin Cancer Res. 10:1255–1262. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Folkman J: Angiogenesis and apoptosis. Semin Cancer Biol. 13:159–167. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Alberts DS, Clouser MC, Hess LM, Springer V, Heidel B and Howell SB: Selection of drugs for intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Intraperitoneal Ther Ovarian Cancer. 1:77–88. 2010.

36 

Malek A, Bakhidze E, Noske A, et al: HMGA2 gene is a promising target for ovarian cancer silencing therapy. Int J Cancer. 123:348–356. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Nguyen TMB, Subramanian IV, Xiao X, et al: Adenoassociated virus-mediated delivery of kringle 5 of human plasminogen inhibits orthotopic growth of ovarian cancer. Gene Ther. 17:606–615. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Young LS and Mautner V: The promise and potential hazards of adenovirus gene therapy. Gut. 48:733–736. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Zhdanov RI, Podobed OV and Vlassov V: Cationic lipid-DNA complexes - lipoplexes - for gene transfer and therapy. Bioelectrochemistry. 58:53–64. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Gao Y, Xu Z, Chen S, et al: Arginine-chitosan/DNA self-assemble nanoparticles for gene delivery: in vitro characteristics and transfection efficiency. Int J Pharm. 359:241–246. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Montier T, Benvegnu T, Jaffre's PA, et al: Progress in cationic lipid-mediated gene transfection: a series of bioinspired lipids as an example. Curr Gene Ther. 8:296–312. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Morille M, Passirani C, Vonarbourg A, et al: Progress in developing cationic vectors for non-viral systemic gene therapy against cancer. Biomaterials. 29:3477–3496. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Suzuki R, Namai E, Oda Y, et al: Cancer gene therapy by IL-12 gene delivery using liposomal bubbles and tumoral ultrasound exposure. J Control Release. 142:245–250. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August 2012
Volume 28 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yang F, Gou M, Deng H, Yi T, Zhong Q, Wei Y and Zhao X: Efficient inhibition of ovarian cancer by recombinant CXC chemokine ligand 10 delivered by novel biodegradable cationic heparin-polyethyleneimine nanogels. Oncol Rep 28: 668-676, 2012.
APA
Yang, F., Gou, M., Deng, H., Yi, T., Zhong, Q., Wei, Y., & Zhao, X. (2012). Efficient inhibition of ovarian cancer by recombinant CXC chemokine ligand 10 delivered by novel biodegradable cationic heparin-polyethyleneimine nanogels. Oncology Reports, 28, 668-676. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1853
MLA
Yang, F., Gou, M., Deng, H., Yi, T., Zhong, Q., Wei, Y., Zhao, X."Efficient inhibition of ovarian cancer by recombinant CXC chemokine ligand 10 delivered by novel biodegradable cationic heparin-polyethyleneimine nanogels". Oncology Reports 28.2 (2012): 668-676.
Chicago
Yang, F., Gou, M., Deng, H., Yi, T., Zhong, Q., Wei, Y., Zhao, X."Efficient inhibition of ovarian cancer by recombinant CXC chemokine ligand 10 delivered by novel biodegradable cationic heparin-polyethyleneimine nanogels". Oncology Reports 28, no. 2 (2012): 668-676. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1853