27-hydroxycholesterol and the expression of three estrogen-sensitive proteins in MCF7 cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 12, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1859
- Pages: 992-998
Abstract
Introduction
27-hydroxycholesterol (27OHC), an abundant circulating cholesterol metabolite, is a potent regulator of some mammalian tissues. Few years ago, combined studies by the research groups of Mangelsdorf and MacDonnell demonstrated that 27OHC, locally produced from cholesterol by atheroma-infiltrating macrophages, damaged the bordering blood vessels (1). The effects of 27OHC were exhibited only by cells containing estrogen receptors (ER), therefore the concept of 27OHC as a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) was suggested (2). The same groups reported later on the detrimental activity of 27OHC on bone homeostasis (3,4). The proliferation of various ER-positive mammary cancer cell lines is also affected by 27OHC, as demonstrated by DuSell et al(2) and by us (5). Remarkably, the proliferation rate of non-tumorigenic mammary MCF10 cells are not affected by the exposure to micromolar concentrations of 27OHC (5). Recently, we have demonstrated that the exposure of ER-positive epithelial mammary tumor cells to 2 μM 27OHC for longer than 48 h triggers their transition into a mesenchymal phenotype (6).
In diverse cell types, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been associated with an increase in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (7). In animals, mitochondrion is the main source of ROS and in the organelle ≤3% of the transported electrons can be diverted to the production of superoxide instead of water (8). The regulation of mitochondrial ROS production is not completely understood, although it must be related with the complex modulation of intracellular metabolic processes (9–11). As mentioned above, reactive oxygen species are stimulatory molecules, crucial for the generation of EMT (12). The increased production of ROS in NB4 cells stimulates the translocation of ERK2 into the nucleus, triggering phosphorylation of p53 (13); a consequence of p53 activation is an augmented expression of mitochondrial superoxide dismutase II (MnSOD, also called SOD type II), enzyme with a major role in the protection from oxidative stress (14).
Several studies have demonstrated the presence of ERβ in various tissues (15,16). Most of the evidence for the presence of this receptor in tissues and cells has been obtained using specific antibody-based assays that, in addition, demonstrate its predominantly mitochondrial localization (17–21). It had been shown that ERβ regulates the production of energy by mitochondria by controlling the expression of components from the respiratory chain [(MRC) (22,23)]. Estrogen-filled receptor promotes the expression of MnSOD, expanding the survival times of these target cells (18). Increased levels of MnSOD protect the cells against oxidative stress and genotoxic injuries by preventing the damage of the mitochondrial (mt) genome and by maintaining the activity of mtDNA polymerase. Ultimately, the enhanced expression of MnSOD defends the cells from genotoxics damaging effects (24).
The expression of ERs in breast cancer cells seems to be related to the function of Forkhead transcription factor FoxM1 (25). Whereas, the expression of FOXM1 protein and mRNA in breast carcinoma cell lines appears to be regulated by estrogen-filled ERα (26). Recent studies indicate that the expression of the FoxM1 transcription factor is regulated by EGFR2 and it was found in ERα-positive breast cancer cell lines that the expression of this protein kinase-receptor is correlated with the expression of FoxM1 (27). FOXM1 regulates the expression of genes controlling the cell cycle at the level of DNA replication and mitosis; an elevated expression of FOXM1 has been reported in numerous ER-positive tumor cells and tissues (28,29).
In the present study we compare the responses of MCF7 cells to 27OHC and estradiol, emphasizing the analysis of the protein expression of three estrogen-sensitive polypeptides: MnSOD, FoxM1 and ERβ. Stimulation periods of 48 and 72 h were chosen, including thus the initial phases of EMT in cells exposed to 27OHC and comparing the responses with those from either non-treated- or estradiol-treated cells.
Materials and methods
Tissue culture material was obtained from NalgeNunc (Rochester, NY, USA). 27-hydroxycholesterol (C6570-000) was purchased from Steraloids Inc. (Newport, RI, USA). Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) was from Gibco-Invitrogen Corp. (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Most of the chemicals used here were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA) or E. Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany).
Antibodies and special probes for cell functionality
Mouse anti-actin (sc-8432), anti-ERα (1D5) (sc-56833), anti-EGFR2 (sc-08) and anti-β catenin (sc-65482) monoclonal antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Rabbit anti-estrogen receptor β (no. 06-629) polyclonal antibody and mouse anti-E-cadherin (MAB3199Z) monoclonal antibody were from Upstate-Chemicon-Millipore (Temecula, CA, USA). Rabbit anti-MnSOD (ab-13533) polyclonal antibody was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Mouse anti-FoxM1 (H00002305-M02) monoclonal antibody was from Abnova Inc. (Taipei, Taiwan). FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (F0257), peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (A6667) and peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (A9917) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Alexa Fluor-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (A10040) and MitoTracker® Red CMXRos (M7512) were obtained from Invitrogen/Molecular Probes (Grand Island, NY, USA). The FITC-Annexin flow kit was purchased from BD Biosciences (Bedford, MA, USA). Gold-decorated Fab2’ fragment (10 nm) of goat anti-mouse IgG (810.188) and Fab2’ fragment of goat anti-rabbit IgG (810.166) were obtained from Aurion, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Cells
Estradiol-sensitive MCF7 epithelial cells from human metastatic breast cancer tissue (HTB 22; ATCC, USA), were cultured in DMEM/F12 containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. In the proliferation studies, the cells were transferred 24 h after seeding to DMEM/F12 containing ITS (insulin, transferrin, selenium), 1% charcoal/dextran-twice-treated serum (CDTS), 3% hydroxyethylated starch (HAES), 50 U/ml penicillin and 50 μg/ml streptomycin. In each of the experiments, the cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified incubator, in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Immunofluorescence studies
MCF7 in medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (~5,000 cells/cm2), were seeded on sterile cover glasses hold in P24 plates incubated for 24 h to allow attachment; subsequently, non-adherent cells and media were removed. The cells were washed twice and incubated for 24 h with low-serum culture medium; then the medium was then adjusted to either 2 μM 27OHC or 2 nM E2 and the cells further incubated for up to 72 h, the time required by the cells exposed to 2 μM 27OHC to frankly display EMT, as checked by immunofluorescent studies using antibodies to E-cadherin, β-catenin and EGFR2, as described in our previous study (6). At the end of the incubation, the cells were fixed (absolute methanol at −20°C), rinsed with DPBS and blocked for 30 min with 2% BSA in DPBS. The samples were then incubated with the primary antibodies for 1 h at RT. After extensive washes (DPBS containing 2% BSA), samples were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody for 1 h and washed. The samples were mounted with Biomeda Gel/Mount (Foster City, CA, USA) and inspected with a Zeiss Axiophot epifluorescence microscope fitted with a color CCD camera (Kappa GmbH, Goettingen, Germany). In each experiment, the images were obtained under fixed settings of illumination, exposure times and camera gain.
Annexin V/PI labeling
The analyses were carried out using the FITC-Annexin flow kit from BD Biosciences, following the instructions of the manufacturer, as described previously (6).
NBT staining
MCF7 cells on cover glasses were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with a filtered solution of 0.3 mg/ml NBT in DPBS. After washing with DPBS, the cells were fixed for 5 min with absolute methanol and rinsed with water. Finally, the coverslips were mounted with Biomeda Gel/Mount and viewed with differential interference contrast (DIC) with a Zeiss microscope; the images were digitalized with a CCD digital camera.
Western blot analyses
MCF7 cells were grown at 37°C and 5% CO2 in phenol red-free media, containing 10% fetal bovine serum. For the exposure experiments, the cells were either left untreated (control) or stimulated with 2 nM 17β-estradiol (E2) or 2 μM 27OHC in D-Mem/F12 containing 1% charcoal-treated calf serum. At different times of treatment, cells were lysed to prepare extracts for western blot analyses of the ERα, ERβ, MnSOD, actin, EGFR2, E-cadherin and β-catenin expression.
Mitotracker CMXRos uptake
The uptake of MitoTracker CMXRos was analyzed following the manufacturer instructions. In brief, cells on the coverslips were incubated for 15 min with 50 nM of probe, fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde, rinsed with prewarmed DPBS, mounted with Biomeda Gel/Mount, viewed with a Zeiss Axiophot fluorescence microscope and the images documented with a CCD digital camera.
Indirect immunogold labeling
The cells were processed for immunogold labeling according to Sierralta et al(30). In brief, cells exposed to the different treatments, were fixed for 1 h at 20°C with 2% freshly depolymerized paraformaldehyde/0.05% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.3. After fixation, the cells were cooled-down, carefully scrapped and thoroughly washed with ice-cold buffer, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and infiltrated at 4°C with LR Gold (two changes for 1 h each and then overnight). The samples were transferred to size-0 gelatine capsules filled with LR Gold containing 0.8% benzoyl peroxide, placed in a pre-cooled aluminium block and allowed to polymerize for 30 min at 4°C in a desiccator evacuated to 500 mm Hg. The blocks were cured for 1–2 days af room temperature and then sectioned with a Reichert ultramicrotome using diamond knives. The 70–90-nm thin sections were mounted on pioloform-coated gold grids and immediately incubated. For this purpose, the grids were floated section side-down for 15 min each at room temperature on droplets of 0.1 M glycin in 20 mM HEPES-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (HBS) and 1% ovalbumin in HBS, then transferred to droplets of the primary antibody solutions appropriately diluted and left for 2 h at room temperature followed by 14 h at 4°C. After exhaustive washes with HBS to remove any free antibody, the sections were incubated for 1 h with the appropriated gold-labelled Fab2’s of the secondary antibodies diluted 1:30 with 1% ovalbumin in HBS. The specimens were ‘jet-washed’ with microfiltered buffer and distilled water, mildly postfixed, slightly contrasted with osmium tetroxide and uranyl acetate and viewed with a Philips CM 100 operating at 80 kV. Appropriated controls were run to assess the specificity of the localization procedures; with either of these controls, a background of <1 gold particle in 200 μm2 of the sections was observed.
Statistical analyses
Student’s t-test was used to evaluate differences between samples and the respective controls. P<0.05 was considered significant. Data were analyzed with Statistica for Windows Software, release 6, Statsoft Inc., USA.
Results
Non-stimulated MCF7 cells exhibited a basal capacity to build peroxides in the cytoplasm, as detected using the nitroblue tetrazolium test (NBT). Those MCF7 cells exposed to 2 nM E2 or 2 μM 27OHC displayed increased precipitation of insoluble formazan as compared with the non-stimulated, control cells; the NBT precipitate was associated with particulate elements of the cytoplasm (Fig. 1).
We analyzed for the possible relationship between the augmented production of insoluble formazan and the expression levels of MnSOD in MCF7 cells. Using the specific antibody, immunoreactivity of this dismutase was observed in the mitochondria of MCF7 cells (upper panel, Fig. 2). Following stimulation with either E2 or 27OHC, increases were observed in the expression of MnSOD when compared to non-stimulated cells. The assignation of MnSOD to mitochondria was confirmed by high-resolution, electron microscopy immunogold labeling. The lower panel shown in Fig. 2 depicts representative images of labelled mitochondria in ultrathin sections from non-stimulated and stimulated MCF7 cells embedded in LR-Gold resin. The fluorescence images of MnSOD presence shown in Fig. 2 were analogous to those obtained from the in vivo uptake of Mitotracker CMXRos (Fig. 3).
The immunoreactivity of ERβ showed essentially a mitochondrial localization in stimulated and non-stimulated cells. Higher expression of ERβ was detected after 48 and 72 h estradiol or 27OHC, as shown in the upper panel of Fig. 4. Immunogold-labeling of ultrathin sections with the specific anti-ERβ antibody demonstrated a predominant mitochondrial residence of ERβ after either sterol-stimulation.
In non-stimulated cells, FoxM1 was customarily detected both in cytoplasm and nucleus by the specific monoclonal antibody. The expression of this potent proliferation controller increased in the nucleus in MCF7 cells exposed for 48 h to 2 nM estradiol or 2 μM 27OHC; at 72 h the immunoreactivity remained high in estradiol-treated cells, but declines in the cells treated with 27OHC, as depicted in the upper panel of Fig. 5. This increase in nuclear immunoreactivity was confirmed at ultrastructural level by immunogold labelling, as shown in the lower panel of Fig. 5.
The changes in MnSOD expression in MCF7 cells exposed to estradiol or 27OHC were analyzed in cell extracts by western blotting; the results confirmed those obtained by indirect immunofluorescence and immunogold labelling studies (Fig. 6).
The changes in the expression of ERβ after exposure to E2 or 27OHC were analyzed in cell extracts by western blotting. The results obtained were coherent with those obtained by indirect immunofluorescence of whole cells and immunogold labelling analyses of cell sections (Fig. 7). Unfortunately, the specific anti-FoxM1 antibody, used for immunomicroscopy, was non-satisfactory in our hands to detect the protein in western blot analyses, independent on the protocol followed.
Discussion
In active cells, tetrazolium salts are reduced in vivo to formazan by the superoxide ion (31); therefore, NBT is widely used as an indicator of mitochondrial metabolism (11,32). Exposing MCF7 cells to either E2 or 27OHC, we observed an increased production of superoxide radical in comparison to the non-treated, control cells. The fluorescence images were comparable to those obtained from the in vivo uptake of Mitotracker CMXRos (Fig. 3). Combined, the results confirm that the treatment with either of these ER-ligands augment the mitochondrial activity, thus increasing ROS production. In parallel to an augmented production of superoxide, we detected the increased expression of MnSOD in stimulated MCF7 cells, suggesting the potential conformation of a defence machinery, probably with the goal to reduce the genotoxic effects from ROS released by the stimulation.
We have demonstrated that an exposure of MCF7 cells to 2 μM 27OHC for at least 48 h is adequate for the induction of their epythelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) (6). The association between an increased production of mitochondrial ROS and induction of EMT in diverse cell types has been reported (7). In the course of EMT, cells acquiring the mesenchymal phenotype exhibit migration and invasion abilities, with new contractile and motile properties. As shown by Giannoni et al, ROS activates the phosphorylation of members from the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family; this redox-dependent phosphorylation of EGFR activates the protein kinases Akt and ERK causing, among others, the degradation of pro-apoptotic proteins (33). In our earlier report we showed that MCF7 cells undergoing the 27OHC-triggered EMT displayed a persistently activated EGFR2 at the plasma membrane with increased traslocation of pERK into the cell nucleus; interestingly, these cells did not exhibit variations in cell death rates by Annexin V/PI labeling (6). In contrast to the non-genomic mitogenic estradiol effects on MCF7 cells, where just a transient stimulation of EGFR2 is observed (5), the exposure to 27OHC caused permanent activation of this membrane receptor. As mentioned in our previous study, 27OHC-triggered EGFR2 activation is not related to the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) nor to the trimming and release of HB-EGF (5). Instead, the most important visible signals for the ongoing EMT were the marked evanescence of E-cadherin, the notorious cellular re-allocation of β-catenin and the permanent activation of EGFR2 (6).
Following the launch of changes in the shape and function of cells experiencing EMT, increases in the cell death rate have been observed (11). As indicated above, we did not detect apoptosis in MCF7 cells following the 27OHC-induced EMT (6). Probably, the increased MnSOD expression would represent a protective cellular response, developed to bypass the toxic effects of the reactive oxygen species generated upon exposure to 27OHC. An example of 27OHC toxicity is provided by experiments using hippocampus-containing rabbit brain slices, where the exposure to 27OHC rapidly induced ROS and oxidative stress in nerve cells, eliciting anatomical and physiological alterations comparable to those observed in the brain of Alzheimer disease patients (34).
The changes induced by estradiol and 27OHC in the proliferation of MCF7 cells and their subsequent EMT, triggered by the oxysterol, are accompanied by an augmented expression of ERβ in mitochondria. It has been reported that the activity of mitochondrial respiratory complex IV (MRC-IV) in cardiomyocytes tightly depends on mitochondrial ERβ associated to SERMs; in addition, the filled-ERβ complex inhibit mitochondrial apoptotic signaling pathways (22). These observations indicate that ERβ is closely related with the control of mitochondrial activity. Conflicting opinions regarding the expression of ERβ in MCF7 cells are been formulated (35); however, numerous studies have demonstrated that this type of estrogen receptor is present in MCF7 cells (24,26,36). In the studies presented here, we confirmed the presence of this receptor subtype inside mitochondria of MCF7 cells and, in addition, observed changes of its expression following stimulation with estradiol and 27OHC.
Transcription factor Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) is a key regulator of cell proliferation being overexpressed in many forms of cancers and leading to uncontrolled cell division and genomic instability (37). An increased expression of FOXM1 is associated with the augmented proliferation of many tumor cell lines: FOXM1 regulates the transcription of genes that participate in the control of the cell cycle (38). The antagonist SERM 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen inhibits the expression of FOXM1 in ER-positive but not in ER-negative breast cancer cell lines, supporting the concept of FOXM1 as a key mediator for the activity of SERMs in ER-positive breast cancer cells (39). A positive correlation between FOXM1 expression and EGFR2 status in ERα-positive breast cancer cells has been found (28), but more information on the interaction between FOXM1 and EGFR2 is required to discern whether FOXM1 directly activates or not the expression of EGFR2. In our experiments, the MCF7 cells exposed for 72 h to 27OHC exhibited a slightly lower expression of FOXM1 as compared to cells exposed to E2 for the same time. Cells treated for 72 h with 27OHC, display a complete EMT, as judged from the immunolabelling patterns of β-catenin, E-cadherin and EGFR2 and the absence of proliferation (6). It has been demonstrated in glioma tumorigenesis, that FOXM1 associates with β-catenin and activate the Wnt pathways (40).
The results presented in this and previous studies (5,6) suggest that in MCF7 cells, 2 μM 27OHC initially functions as a regular agonist SERM; an exposure to the oxysterol exceeding 48 h will initiate a non-reversible phenotypical change into a mesenchymal cell type, with increased expression of MnSOD, ERβ and FOXM1. At the level of these proteins, comparable results were obtained at 48-h exposure between 27OHC and E2, the most specific ER-ligand. However, we detected lower nuclear levels of FOXM1 after an exposure of 72 h to 27OHC and estradiol. The oxisterol-treated cells displayed lower immunoreactivity of the protein, in parallel with an arrested proliferation in the MCF7 cells, transformed by an EMT process by activation of the Wnt signaling pathway.
It is well known that resistance may develop during the treatment of mammary cancer with anti-estrogens and aromatase inhibitors. This may be related to a continual operation of estrogen signaling pathways; a permanently activated path may be the consequence of an association of ERs with endogenous SERMs, such as 27OHC. Through metabolism of profusely available cholesterol, some cells produce and secrete 27OHC in their neighborhood; the infiltration with macrophages is a negative prognostic indicator in patients with a mammary gland tumor, probably because macrophages vigorously produces 27OHC (41). It is quite possible that in infiltrated tissues, tumor cells are constantly stimulated by local macrophages transforming cholesterol into 27OHC.
It has been suggested that obesity increases the risk of breast cancer because the high aromatase levels of adipose tissue produce elevated local concentrations of estradiol. However, obesity is associated with hypercholesterolemia and increased levels of circulating 27OHC, therefore, a stimulatory effect of the oxysterol will likely be observed in ER-positive cancer cells from obese patients. Furthermore, the triggering of EMT by 27OHC in MCF7 cells strengthens the warning about the risks from obesity for breast cancer patients.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Fondecyt Chile, grant no. 1090057.
References
Umetani M, Domoto H, Gormley AK, Yuhanna IS, Cummins CL, Javitt NB, Korach KS, Shaul PW and Mangelsdorf DJ: 27-Hydroxycholesterol is an endogenous SERM that inhibits the cardiovascular effects of estrogens. Nat Med. 13:1185–1192. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
DuSell CD, Umetani M, Shaul PW, Mangelsdorf DJ and McDonnell DP: 27-Hydroxycholesterol is an endogenous selective estrogen receptor modulator. Mol Endocrinol. 22:65–77. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
DuSell CD, Nelson ER, Wang X, Abdo J, Mödder UI, Umetani M, Gesty-Palmer D, Javitt NB, Khosla S and McDonnell DP: The endogenous selective estrogen receptor modulator 27-hydroxycholesterol is a negative regulator of bone homeostasis. Endocrinology. 151:3675–3685. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nelson ER, DuSell CD, Wang X, Howe MK, Evans G, Michalek RD, Umetani M, Rathmell JC, Khosla S, Gesty-Palmer D and McDonnell DP: The oxysterol, 27-hydroxycholesterol links cholesterol metabolism to bone homeostasis through its actions on the estrogen and liver X receptors. Endocrinology. 152:4691–4705. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cruz P, Torres C, Ramírez ME, Epuñán MI, Valladares LE and Sierralta WD: Proliferation of human mammary cancer cells exposed to 27-hydroxycholesterol. Exp Ther Med. 1:531–536. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Torres CG, Ramírez ME, Cruz P, Epuñan MI, Valladares LE and Sierralta WD: 27hydroxycholesterol induces the transition of MCF7 cells into a mesenchymal phenotype. Oncol Rep. 26:389–397. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou G, Dada LA, Wu M, Kelly A, Trejo H, Zhou Q, Varga J and Sznajder JI: Hypoxia-induced alveolar epithelial-mesenchymal transition requires mitochondríal ROS and hypoxia-inducible factor I. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 297:L1120–L1130. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Boveris A and Chance B: The mitochondrial generation of hydrogen peroxide: general properties and effect of hyperbaric oxygen. Biochem J. 134:707–716. 1973.PubMed/NCBI | |
Nemoto S, Takeda K, Yu Z-X, Ferrans VJ and Finkel T: Role for mitochondrial oxidants as regulators of cellular metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 20:7311–7318. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nicholls DG and Budd SU: Mitochondria and neuronal survival. Physiol Rev. 80:315–360. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Werner E and Werb Z: Integrins engage mitochondrial function for signal transduction by a mechanism dependent on Rho GTPases. J Cell Biol. 158:357–368. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Giannoni E, Bianchini F, Calorini L and Chiarugi P: Cancer associated fibroblasts exploit reactive oxygen species through a proinflammatory signature leading to epithelial mesenchymal transition and stemness. Antioxid Redox Signal. 14:2361–2371. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Li Z, Shi K, Guan L, Cao T, Jiang Q, Yang Y and Xu C: ROS leads to MnSOD upregulation through ERK2 translocation and p53 activation in selenite-induced apoptosis of NB4 cells. FEBS Lett. 584:2291–2297. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bakthavatchalu V, Dey S, Xu Y, Noel T, Jungsuwadee P, Holley AK, Dhar SK, Batinic-Haberle I and St Clair DK: Manganese superoxide dismutase is a mitochondrial fidelity protein that protects Polγ against UV-induced inactivation. Oncogene. Sep 12–2011.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen M, Ni J, Chang HC, Lin CY, Muyan M and Yeh S: CCDC62/ERAP75 functions as a coactivator to enhance estrogen receptor beta-mediated transactivation and target gene expression in prostate cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 30:841–850. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Monje P and Boland R: Subcellular distribution of native estrogen receptor alpha and beta isoforms in rabbit uterus and ovary. J Cell Biochem. 82:467–479. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fox EM, Davis RJ and Shupnik MA: ERβ in breast cancer -onlooker, passive player or active protector? Steroids. 73:1039–1051. 2008. | |
Yager ID and Chen JQ: Mitochondrial estrogen receptors-new insights into specific functions. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 18:89–91. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Klinge CM: Estrogenic control of mitochondrial function and biogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 105:1342–1351. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Psarra AM and Sekeris CE: Steroid and thyroid hormone receptors in mitochondria. IUBMB Life. 60:210–223. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Simpkins JW, Yang SH, Sarkar SN and Pearce V: Estrogen actions on mitochondria: physiological and pathological implications. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 290:51–59. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hsieh YC, Yu HP, Suzuki T, Choudhry MA, Schwacha MG, Bland KI and Chaudry IH: Upregulation of mitochondrial respiratory complex IV by estrogen receptor-beta is critical for inhibiting mitochondrial apoptotic signaling and restoring cardiac functions following trauma-hemorrhage. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 41:511–521. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen JQ, Russo PA, Cooke C, Russo IH and Russo J: ERbeta shifts from mitochondria to nucleus during estrogen-induced neoplastic transformation of human breast epithelial cells and is involved in estrogen-induced synthesis of mitochondrial respiratory chain proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1773:1732–1746. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bakthavatchalu V, Dey S, Xu Y, Noel T, Jungsuwadee P, Holley AK, Dhar SK, BatinicHaberle I, St Chen JQ, Delannoy M, Cooke C and Yager ID: Mitochondrial localization of ERalpha and ERbeta in human MCF7 cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 286:E1011–E1022. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Madureira PA, Varshochi R, Constantinidou D, Francis RE, Coombes RC, Yao KM and Lam EW: The Forkhead box M1 protein regulates the transcription of the estrogen receptor alpha in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 281:25167–25176. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Millour J, Constantinidou D, Stavropoulou AV, Wilson MS, Myatt SS, Kwok JM, Pedram A, Razandi M, Wallace DC and Levin ER: Functional estrogen receptors in the mitochondria of breast cancer cells. Mol Biol Cell. 17:2125–2137. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Francis RE, Myatt SS, Krol J, Hartman J, Peck B, McGovern UB, Wang J, Guest SK, Filipovic A, Gojis O, Palmieri C, Peston D, Shousha S, Yu Q, Sicinski P, Coombes RC and Lam EW: FoxM1 is a downstream target and marker of HER2 overexpression in breast cancer. Int J Oncol. 35:57–68. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bektas N, Haaf A, Veeck J, Wild PI, Lüscher-Firzlaff J, Hartmann A, Knüchel R and Dahl E: Tight correlation between expression of the Forkhead transcription factor FOXMi and HER2 in human breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 8:422008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sivanandan K, Coombes RC, Medema RH, Hartman J, Lykkesfeldt AE and Lam EW: FOXM1 is a transcriptional target of ERalpha and has a critical role in breast cancer endocrine sensitivity and resistance. Oncogene. 29:2983–2995. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sierralta WD, Boenig I and Thole HH: Immunogold labelling of estradiol receptor in MCF 7 cells. Cell Tis Res. 279:445–452. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Flohé L and Otting F: Superoxide dismutase assays. Methods Enzymol. 105:93–104. 1984. | |
Powers SK, Lieu FK, Criswell D and Dodd S: Biochemical verification of quantitative histochemical analysis of succinate dehydrogenase activity in skeletal muscle fibres. Histochem J. 25:491–496. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Giannoni E, Buricchi F, Grimaldi G, Parri M, Cialdai F, Taddei ML, Raugei G, Ramponi G and Chiarugi P: Redox regulation of anoikis: reactive oxygen species as essential mediators of cell survival. Cell Death Differ. 15:867–878. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Prasanthi JRP, Larson T, Schommer J and Ghribi O: Silencing GADD153/CHOP gene expression protects against Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology induced by 27-hydroxycholesterol in rabbit hippocampus. PLoS One. 6:e26420 View Article : Google Scholar : 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Nilsson S and Gustafsson JA: Estrogen receptors: therapies targeted to receptor subtypes. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 89:44–55. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao C, Dahlman-Wright K and Gustafsson JA: Estrogen signaling via estrogen receptors. J Biol Chem. 285:39575–39579. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kwok JM, Peck B, Monteiro U, Schwenen HD, Millour J, Coombes RC, Myatt SS and Lam EW: FOXM1 confers acquired cisplatin resistance in breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res. 8:24–34. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chua PJ, Yip GW and Bay BH: Cell cycle arrest induced by hydrogen peroxide is associated with modulation of oxidative stress related genes in breast cancer cells. Exp Biol Med. 234:1086–1094. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Karadedou CT: Regulation of the FOXM1 transcription factor by the estrogen receptor alpha at the protein level in breast cancer. Hippokratia. 10:128–132. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang N, Wei P, Gong A, Chiu WT, Lee HT, Colman H, Huang H, Xue J, Liu M, Wang Y, Sawaya R, Xie K, Yung WK, Medema RH, He X and Huang S: FoxM1 promotes R-catenin nuclear localization and controls Wnt target-gene expression and glioma tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 20:427–442. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Steele RJ, Eremin O, Brown M and Hawkins RA: A high macrophage content in human breast cancer is not associated with favourable prognostic factors. Br J Surg. 71:456–458. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |