Live attenuated measles virus vaccine induces apoptosis and promotes tumor regression in lung cancer
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 29, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.2109
- Pages: 199-204
Abstract
Introduction
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, resulting in more than 1.1 million deaths worldwide (1,2). Approximately 75–80% of lung cancer cases are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and 65% of these patients have advanced-stage disease at diagnosis (3). Despite the aggressive approaches achieved in the therapy of lung cancer in the past decades, the prognosis of NSCLC remains poor, with 5-year survival rates of 5–14%, even when patients are treated with surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy (4–6). Therefore, efforts to develop new and less toxic therapeutic approaches for the treatment of lung cancer are ongoing.
Measles virus, one member of the Paramyxoviridae family, is a negative strand RNA virus. The typical cytopathic effect of Measles virus is the formation of multinuclear cell aggregates (syncytia), which result from the fusion of infected cells. The wild-type virus enters cells exclusively via the SLAM receptor, one of the surface hemagglutinin (H) glycoproteins predominantly found on activated B and T lymphocytes (9–11). In contrast, the attenuated measles vaccine virus Edmonston strain preferentially infects cells with the CD46 receptor (12,13), which is frequently overexpressed in tumor cells (14). In addition, measles vaccine strains are attenuated and have an excellent safety record with several hundred millions of vaccine doses having been safely administered in over 40 years of use. These preferences enable the attenuated measles vaccine virus to be tumor-selective and result in minimal cytopathic effects on normal tissue.
Previous studies have shown that live attenuated measles virus Edmonston B strain has potent and specific oncolytic activity against a variety of human tumor types, including lymphoma, multiple myeloma, epithelial ovarian cancer and glioma (15–20). Thus, the present study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of live attenuated measles vaccine virus Hu-191 strain (MV) for the treatment of lung carcinoma. This study demonstrated that the oncolytic therapy exhibits powerful antitumor effects against murine lung carcinoma and provides potential implications for the treatment of human lung cancer.
Materials and methods
Cell lines
LLC, A549 and HEK 293T cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). They were maintained in monolayer cultures in DMEM, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Live attenuated measles vaccine virus Hu-191 strain was obtained from Chengdu Company of Biological Products.
MTT colorimetric assay
Survival of cells after treatment was quantified using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) colorimetric assay (21). Briefly, LLC and A549 cells were seeded in 96-well plates (1×104/ml). They were treated with MV or PBS. Each well was supplemented with 20 μl of 5 mg/ml MTT in complete media and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The medium and MTT solution were then removed, and 150 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each well. 293T cells were also treated as a non-transformed cell control. Absorbance was read at 490 nm using a microplate reader. Data were the average of 6 wells, and the experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. Medium only-treated cells served as the indicator of 100% cell viability.
Assessment of apoptosis in vitro
Cell apoptosis was analyzed by DNA ladder and flow cytometry (Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection kit; Sigma). The pattern of DNA cleavage was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis as described (22). Briefly, cells (1×106) were lysed with 0.1 ml lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1% Nonidet P-40 and 20 mM EDTA, followed by the addition of RNase A (Sigma) at a final concentration of 10 μg/μl and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Cells were then treated with 2.5 μg/μl proteinase K overnight at 37°C. Samples (10 μl) in each lane were subjected to electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose at 50 V for 3 h. DNA was stained with ethidium bromide.
Cells were collected and resuspended in 1X binding buffer at a concentration of 1×106 cells/ml. Annexin V-FITC conjugate (5 μl) and 10 μl of propidium iodide solution (22–24) were added to each cell suspension. After 10 min of incubation at room temperature, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Cells undergoing early apoptosis were stained with the Annexin V-FITC conjugate alone. Live cells showed no staining by either the propidium iodide solution or Annexin V-FITC conjugate. Necrotic cells were stained by both the propidium iodide solution and Annexin V-FITC conjugate.
Murine tumor model and treatment
Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells (1×106 to 1×107 cells) were inoculated subcutaneously in the right flanks of C57BL/6 mice 6–8 weeks of age. To explore the therapeutic efficacy of MV, we treated the mice on day 15 after the implantation of tumor cells, when the size of tumors reached ~30 mm3. The mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (5 male and 5 female mice/group). Approximately 1×106, 1×105, 1×104 CCID50/ml of MV or PBS were injected into the tumor every other day for 5 times. Tumor volume was determined by the following formula: Tumor volume (mm3) = π/6 × length (mm) × width (mm) × width (mm). All of the studies involving mice were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines concerning animal use and care. On day 4 after the completion of treatment as described above, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Mouse tissues of interest were excised and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution or frozen at 80°C (25).
Histological analysis
For the observations of potential side effects in the treated mice, the tissues from each group were embedded in paraffin. Sections (3–5 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (26). Immunostaining for MV was performed as previously described (27). Briefly, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from the treated mice were incubated with a polyclonal rabbit antibody against MV at a 1:300 dilution at 4°C overnight. Following washes, the secondary antibody, biotinylated goat anti-rabbit antibody at a 1:100 dilution (Dako, Carpinteria, CA), was added. Sections were then stained with streptavidin biotin reagents (Dako LSAB kit; peroxidase). Immunofluorescence staining was used to determine the infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in the tumor tissue. The frozen sections were blocked (10% FBS, 3% BSA) for 30 min before staining with the anti-CD4 antibody (ab51312; Abcam, USA) and anti-CD8 antibody (ab22378; Abcam). Fluorescence was visualized, and images were captured with fluorescence microscopy.
Quantitative assessment of apoptosis
Tumor species were prepared as described above. The presence of apoptotic cells within the tumor sections was determined using the In Situ Cell Death Detection kit (Fluorescein; Roche), following the manufacturer’s instructions. It is based on the enzymatic addition of digoxigenin nucleotide to the nicked DNA by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (28). In the tissue sections, four equal-sized fields were randomly chosen and analyzed. As a proliferation marker, Ki67 is required for maintaining cell proliferation. Immunohistochemical analysis with the anti-Ki67 antibody (ab16667; Abcam) was used to measure proliferation in the tumor tissue.
Evaluation of potential adverse effects
To evaluate the potential side effects or toxicity on mice during the treatment, gross measures such as weight loss, ruffling of fur, lifespan, behavior and feeding were investigated. Tissues from the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney and brain were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution, embedded in paraffin, and stained with H&E.
Data analysis and statistics
In order for the comparison of individual time points, data were assayed by variance (ANOVA) and an unpaired Student’s t-test (29). Survival analysis was computed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test (30). A P-value of <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
In vitro induction of apoptosis of lung cancer cell lines with MV treatment
To study the ability of MV to augment the induction of apoptosis of cells, we treated the various cell lines with MV. A549, LLC and 293T cells were seeded in cell culture flasks separately in appropriate culture. As shown in Fig. 1A, MV increased the cytopathic effect on both the A549 and LLC cell lines compared with the control group. Cell viability was also determined by MTT assay. As shown in Fig. 1B, the treatment of MV reduced the A549 and LLC cell viability by 60 and 62%, respectively, whereas the treatment with MV reduced 293T cell viability by 31%. These results indicated that the treatment of MV resulted in additive cytotoxicity to A549 and LLC lung cancer cells. However, the treatment showed less effect on 293T cell viability when compared with the nontransformed cell control.
In the next set of experiments, we aimed to determine increased cell apoptosis induced by MV. Flow cytometry was used to estimate the number of apoptotic cells. As shown in Fig. 2A, treatment with MV increased the number of apoptotic cells compared with the control groups. Furthermore, agarose gel electrophoresis of MV demonstrated a ladder-like pattern of DNA fragments consisting of multiples of ~150–200 bp, consistent with internucleosomal DNA fragmentation (Fig. 2B).
In vivo inhibition of growth of established lung carcinoma in mice
To determine the antitumor activity of MV in vivo, immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice bearing LLC Lewis lung carcinoma were treated with various amounts of MV or PBS. Our findings showed that both 104 CCID50/ml MV and 105 CCID50/ml MV resulted in effective suppression of tumor growth. However, the treatment of 106 CCID50/ml MV had a superior antitumor effect, resulting in >50% inhibition in tumor volume compared with the PBS group. No significant difference in tumor volumes was observed between the 104 CCID50/ml MV and 105 CCID50/ml MV groups (Fig. 3A). Moreover, a significant increase in the survival rate was observed in the 106 CCID50/ml MV-treated mice (P<0.05, by log-rank test; Fig. 3B). In addition, 106 CCID50/ml MV therapy effectively prolonged the lifespan of the tumor-bearing animals.
In vivo induction of apoptosis following MV treatment
Having confirmed the antitumor activity in LLC Lewis lung carcinoma models, we examined apoptosis-related molecular markers in tumor sections. An apoptosis detection kit (TUNEL) was used to detect early DNA fragmentation associated with apoptosis. Apoptotic cells were noted within the tumors treated with 106 CCID50/ml MV, compared with the treatment with 105 CCID50/ml MV or 104 CCID50/ml MV or PBS groups (Fig. 4A). We also tested the proliferation index of tumor tissues. Immunohistochemical analysis with the anti-Ki67 antibody, which is used to measure proliferation in tumor tissues, showed less proliferative cells within the tumors treated with 106 CCID50/ml MV, compared with the other three groups (Fig. 4B).
MV antigen-positive tumor cells were found within the tumors treated with MV, which confirmed that MV was capable of replicating in tumors. Virus antigen was detectable within either apoptotic cells or the intact tumor cells (Fig. 5A).
Histological analysis of intratumoral T-cell infiltration
To determine whether the therapy improved the infiltration of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes into the tumors, anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies were used in the immunofluorescence staining. The results showed that 106 CCID50/ml MV or 105 CCID50/ml MV significantly increased the infiltration of both CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes (Fig. 6).
Histological examination of tumor sections by H&E staining showed that PBS-treated group tumor cells had well-defined cell borders and hyperchromatic nuclei. The cytoplasm of these cells was vesicular and eosinophilic, with evidence of mitosis. In contrast, tumors from mice treated with MV showed extensive necrosis, characterized by loss of nuclear staining, increased cytoplasmic eosinophilia, and loss of cellular detail and cell borders (Fig. 5B).
Observation of potential toxicity
To evaluate the possible adverse effects of the treatments, the body weights of the mice were monitored every 7 days throughout the entire experiment and these values were considered as a variable for the evaluation of systemic well-being or cachexia. No significant differences in weights were found among the four groups. No adverse consequences in other gross measures such as ruffling of fur, behavior, feeding, or toxic death were observed in the 106 CCID50/ml MV-treated group. In the histopathological examination of the tissues, there was also no significant differences. Therefore, we confirmed that MV treatment is safe and effective.
Discussion
The beneficial effects of viral infections on cancer patients have been known for decades. Numerous viruses, such as adenovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus and measles virus, are currently considered as potential cancer therapeutics (31,32). Among them, measles virus was successfully used to treat multiple tumors, including myeloma, ovarian cancer and glioma after either intratumoral, intraperitoneal, or intravenous administration (7,19,20). Lung carcinoma is an aggressive tumor highly resistant to current therapeutic approaches, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy (8). These studies suggest a substantial antineoplastic potential for measles virus. The present studies were designed to test the therapeutic efficacy of MV in murine lung carcinoma.
The data in the present study showed that MV oncolytic therapy not only specifically and significantly reduced the growth of highly tumorigenic and poorly immunogenic LLC cells but also effectively improved the survival of tumor-bearing animals. Although the exact mechanism remains to be determined, the antitumor efficacy of MV in vivo may in part result from the increased induction of apoptosis following treatment. This suggestion is supported by the present findings. In vitro treatment with MV significantly reduced the viability (Fig. 1) and increased the apoptosis of tumor cells compared with PBS treatment (Fig. 2). In addition, more apparent apoptotic cells were found in the tumors treated with MV compared with the PBS-treated group. The mechanism by which MV leads to tumor cell apoptosis may be related to virus replication. This feature of viral replication provides continuous amplification of the input dose which continues until being stopped by the immune response or a lack of susceptible cells.
Breaking of immune tolerance against self-tumor antigen and induction of auto-immunity against tumors should be a useful approach for the treatment of tumors. Previous studies have shown that introduction of new antigens into tumor cells stimulates immune responses against autologous malignant cells. In the present study, intratumoral delivery of MV in tumor cells was intended to modify the tumor cells and enhance the presentation ability of the modified tumor cells to antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and then cross-priming through APCs. Our findings found a significant increasing infiltration. However, treatment with MV significantly increased the infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in the tumor tissues of the MV-treated group coincident with previous reports (Fig. 6).
The management of unresectable lung cancers remains a major therapeutic challenge to medical oncologists. Our observations may have potential implications for the treatment of human lung cancer by MV, since MV is capable of repressing tumor growth when administered.
Collectively, the present study showed that MV treatment resulted in statistically significant reduction in tumor growth, increased apoptosis of lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, and increased infiltration of lymphocytes, while significantly prolonging the survival of tumor-bearing animals. In addition, there was no obvious undesired toxicity following treatment. Our findings suggest that intratumoral delivery of MV may be a promising strategy for the treatment of lung cancer. Further studies involving this treatment strategy, used alone or in combination with chemotherapy and biotherapy, warrant consideration. Live attenuated measles vaccine may be used as a novel type of anticancer drug.
References
Minna JD, Roth JA and Gazdar AF: Focus on lung cancer. Cancer Cell. 1:49–52. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J and Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 57:43–66. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu J and Johnson DH; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 346:92–98. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Khuri FR, Herbst RS and Fossella FV: Emerging therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 12:739–744. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Soria JC, Jang SJ, Khuri FR, Hassan K, Liu D, Hong WK and Mao L: Overexpression of cyclin B1 in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and its clinical implication. Cancer Res. 60:4000–4004. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Vora SA, Daly BD, Blaszkowsky L, McGrath JJ, Bankoff M, Supran S and Dipetrillo TA: High dose radiation therapy and chemotherapy as induction treatment for stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 89:1946–1952. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Peng KW, Facteau S, Wegman T, O’Kane D and Russell SJ: Non-invasive in vivo monitoring of trackable viruses expressing soluble marker peptides. Nat Med. 8:527–531. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhong H, Han B, Tourkova IL, Lokshin A, Rosenbloom A, Shurin MR and Shurin GV: Low-dose paclitaxel prior to intratumoral dendritic cell vaccine modulates intratumoral cytokine network and lung cancer growth. Clin Cancer Res. 13:5455–5462. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Erlenhoefer C, Wurzer WJ, Löffler S, Schneider-Schaulies S, ter Meulen V and Schneider-Schaulies J: CD150 (SLAM) is a receptor for measles virus but is not involved in viral contact-mediated proliferation inhibition. J Virol. 75:4499–4505. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tatsuo H, Ono N, Tanaka K and Yanagi Y: SLAM (CDw150) is a cellular receptor for measles virus. Nature. 406:893–897. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hsu EC, Iorio C, Sarangi F, Khine AA and Richardson CD: CDw150 (SLAM) is a receptor for a lymphotropic strain of measles virus and may account for the immunosuppressive properties of this virus. Virology. 279:9–21. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dörig RE, Marcil A, Chopra A and Richardson CD: The human CD46 molecule is a receptor for measles virus (Edmonston strain). Cell. 75:295–305. 1993.PubMed/NCBI | |
Naniche D, Varior-Krishnan G, Cervoni F, Wild TF, Rossi B, Rabourdin-Combe C and Gerlier D: Human membrane cofactor protein (CD46) acts as a cellular receptor for measles virus. J Virol. 67:6025–6032. 1993.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bjørge L, Hakulinen J, Wahlström T, Matre R and Meri S: Complement-regulatory proteins in ovarian malignancies. Int J Cancer. 70:14–25. 1997. | |
Grote D, Russell SJ, Cornu TI, Cattaneo R, Vile R, Poland GA and Fielding AK: Live attenuated measles virus induces regression of human lymphoma xenografts in immunodeficient mice. Blood. 97:3746–3754. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Grote D, Cattaneo R and Fielding AK: Neutrophils contribute to the measles virus-induced antitumor effect: enhancement by granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor expression. Cancer Res. 63:6463–6468. 2003. | |
Peng KW, Ahmann GJ, Pham L, Greipp PR, Cattaneo R and Russell SJ: Systemic therapy of myeloma xenografts by an attenuated measles virus. Blood. 98:2002–2007. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dingli D, Peng KW, Harvey ME, Greipp PR, O’Connor MK, Cattaneo R, Morris JC and Russell SJ: Image-guided radiovirotherapy for multiple myeloma using a recombinant measles virus expressing the thyroidal sodium iodide symporter. Blood. 103:1641–1646. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Phuong LK, Allen C, Peng KW, Giannini C, Greiner S, TenEyck CJ, Mishra PK, Macura SI, Russell SJ and Galanis EC: Use of a vaccine strain of measles virus genetically engineered to produce carcinoembryonic antigen as a novel therapeutic agent against glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res. 63:2462–2469. 2003. | |
Peng KW, TenEyck CJ, Galanis E, Kalli KR, Hartmann LC and Russell SJ: Intraperitoneal therapy of ovarian cancer using an engineered measles virus. Cancer Res. 62:4656–4662. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Pumphrey CY, Theus AM, Li S, Parrish RS and Sanderson RD: Neoglycans, carbodiimide-modified glycosaminoglycans: a new class of anticancer agents that inhibit cancer cell proliferation and induce apoptosis. Cancer Res. 62:3722–3728. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wei YQ, Zhao X, Kariya Y, Fukata H, Teshigawara K and Uchida A: Induction of apoptosis by quercetin: involvement of heat shock protein. Cancer Res. 54:4952–4957. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gorczyca W, Gong J, Ardelt B, Traganos F and Darzynkiewicz Z: The cell cycle related differences in susceptibility of HL-60 cells to apoptosis induced by various antitumor agents. Cancer Res. 53:3186–3192. 1993.PubMed/NCBI | |
Barry MA, Reynolds JE and Eastman A: Etoposide-induced apoptosis in human HL-60 cells is associated with intracellular acidification. Cancer Res. 53:2349–2357. 1993.PubMed/NCBI | |
Sauter BV, Martinet O, Zhang WJ, Mandeli J and Woo SL: Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of endostatin in vivo results in high level of transgene expression and inhibition of tumor growth and metastases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:4802–4807. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wei YQ, Hang ZB and Liu KF: In situ observation of inflammatory cell-tumor cell interaction in human seminomas (germinomas): light, electron microscopic, and immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol. 23:421–428. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li G, Tian L, Hou JM, Ding ZY, He QM, Feng P, Wen YJ, Xiao F, Yao B, Zhang R, Peng F, Jiang Y, Luo F, Zhao X, Zhang L, Zhou Q and Wei YQ: Improved therapeutic effectiveness by combining recombinant CXC chemokine ligand 10 with cisplatin in solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 11:4217–4224. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xiao F, Wei Y, Yang L, Zhao X, Tian L, Ding Z, Yuan S, Lou Y, Liu F, Wen Y, Li J, Deng H, Kang B, Mao Y, Lei S, He Q, Su J, Lu Y, Niu T, Hou J and Huang MJ: A gene therapy for cancer based on the angiogenesis inhibitor, vasostatin. Gene Ther. 9:1207–1213. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Peto R and Peto J: Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 135:185–207. 1972. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Malaguarnera L: Implications of apoptosis regulators in tumorigenesis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 23:367–387. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu TC and Kim D: Systemic efficacy with oncolytic virus therapeutics: clinical proof-of-concept and future directions. Cancer Res. 67:429–432. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Parato KA, Senger D, Forsyth PA and Bell JC: Recent progress in the battle between oncolytic viruses and tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 5:965–976. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |