Chemopreventive effects of PBI-Se, a selenium-containing analog of PBIT, on AOM-induced aberrant crypt foci in F344 rats
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 23, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2483
- Pages: 952-960
Abstract
Introduction
Colon cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States, resulting in ~55,000 deaths a year (1). It is considered one of the most preventable types of cancers as several modifiable environmental factors have been identified to play important roles in the development of this disease. These include specific dietary components such as selenium, an important micronutrient that can protect colonic cells against a wide range of external and internal stressors. Selenium has been reported to inhibit the growth of malignant colonic cells as well as to induce their demise.
Control of inflammatory conditions can also impact colon carcinogenesis. Inflammation favors tumorigenesis by stimulating angiogenesis (2), damaging DNA (3,4), and chronically stimulating cell proliferation (5,6). Proinflammatory genes have been shown to be important for the maintenance and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC) (7). Proinflammatory cytokines bind to specific receptors and activate various signal transduction pathways in the epithelial cells as well as in interacting immune cells, leading to upregulation of prostaglandin synthase 2 (PTGS2), interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6 and IL-8 genes (8). These genes have been shown to exhibit proinflammatory activity in the intestine (9,10). These findings support the regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as aspirin or ibuprofen, which are associated with a 40–50% decrease in the relative risk for colon cancer (11).
Nitric oxide (NO) has been implicated in the carcinogenic process, particularly in colon or intestinal epithelial cell lines (12,13) and in the known impairment of regulatory processes in these cells (14). The calcium-independent, inducible form of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) can be induced in many different cell types by cytokines and bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Once expressed, iNOS can produce sustained and substantial amounts of NO, which can be cytotoxic (15,16). Recently, natural and synthetic drugs that inhibit iNOS and both the NF-κB and STAT3 pathways (17) have been shown to reduce intestinal inflammation in patients and in rodents with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Chemically induced colonic inflammation and formation of aberrant crypt foci (ACF, early precursor lesions of colon cancer) also were diminished in animal models administered the iNOS inhibitor S,S′-1,4-phenylenebis(1,2-ethanediyl)bis-isothiourea (PBIT) (18).
To create a more potent compound for inhibition of colon cancer, a novel isosteric analog of PBIT, S,S′-1,4-phenylenebis(1,2-ethanediyl)bis-isoselenourea (PBIsSe) was synthesized, in which sulfur was replaced with selenium. Incorporation of selenium into the structure of PBIT provided the agent with additional novel properties at very low concentrations. To investigate the efficacy of these iNOS inhibitors for CRC, we first examined the effect of PBI-Se and PBIT on the well-differentiated human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cell line stimulated with a defined cytokine mixture (consisting of interferon γ (IFNγ), interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) or with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and monitored inhibition of growth, induction of apoptosis, and production of key proinflammatory signaling molecules (IL-8 and IL-6). Most human intestinal cell lines studied are poorly differentiated under standard growth conditions. The Caco-2 cell line is considered to resemble normal intestinal epithelial cells (19). LPS and the cytokine mixture have been shown to increase IL-8, IL-6 and iNOS production (20,21). We also examined the chemopreventive efficacy of PBIT and PBI-Se in an azoxymethane (AOM)-induced rat colon carcinogenesis model using ACF as an endpoint biomarker, and we tested the influence of PBI-Se on immune cells.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and reagents
Caco-2 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and used between passages 30 and 35. Cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 4 mM L-glutamine, 20% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% non-essential amino acids. Cells were cultured at 37°C in a water-saturated atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2, re-fed every 2 days and passaged weekly. Caco-2 cells were used at 21 days after confluence as indicated, to permit differentiation. PBIT and PBI-Se were provided by Dr Dhemant Desai and were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The primary antibodies for cyclin D1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The anti-rabbit antibody and ECL detection system were from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL, USA). Ethidium bromide and acridine orange were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Cell induction and treatment
Cells were grown as indicated above. At ~70% confluence and 21 days, cultures were switched to serum-free medium for 24 h. The serum-free medium was removed and the cell monolayer was washed with PBS (pH 7.4) prior to addition of cytokines and LPS with PBIT or PBI-Se in fresh medium without serum. Based on a previous study (21), the cytokine concentrations used for induction were IFNγ (200 μg/ml), IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and TNFα (100 ng/ml); the LPS concentration was 1 μg/ml.
Assay of the effect of PBI-Se and PBIT on cell viability
After teatment with PBIT or PBI-Se, cells were harvested and dissociated in a solution of 0.25% trypsin and 3 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in PBS, pH 7.4 (without calcium and magnesium). Trypan blue was added and cells were counted with a hemocytometer. Only cells that excluded the dye were counted as viable. Results are expressed as the number of viable cells/ml.
Detection of apoptosis
Cells were exposed to PBIT (0, 30, 60 and 100 μM) and PBI-Se (0, 2, 4 and 6 μM) for 24 h. Acridine orange/ethidium bromide (1 μl of a stock prepared from one part each of 100 μg/ml acridine orange and 100 μg/ml ethidium bromide in PBS) was added to the cell suspension (25 μl; 5×106/ml) just before microscopy. A 10-μl aliquot of the gently mixed suspension was placed on microscope slides, covered with glass coverslips, and examined under an Olympus AX71 microscope connected to a digital imaging system with SPOT RT software version 3.0. Cells were scored according to the following categories: C1, cells with large, green, non-condensed nuclei defined as non-apoptotic, viable cells; C2, cells with red/orange nuclei showing signs of nuclear bead formation defined as apoptotic cells; and C3, cells with large red nuclei not showing signs of nuclear condensation or bead formation defined as necrotic cells. At least 200 cells per sample were counted and scored. The apoptotic index (%) was calculated by dividing the sum of apoptotic cells (C2) × 100 by the total number of cells scored.
Reverse transcription-PCR for IL-6 and IL-8
Caco2 cells were treated with cytokine mixture and LPS plus subtoxic concentrations of PBIT and PBI-Se for 24 h. Total RNA from the treated and untreated samples was extracted using ToTally RNA™ kit (Ambion) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal quantities of DNA-free RNA were used for reverse transcription reactions for cDNA conversion using the SuperScript™ Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen). PCR conditions for IL-8 amplifications were denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 50 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec, 55°C for 10 sec and 72°C for 20 sec; PCR conditions for IL-6 consisted of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 62°C for 40 sec and extension at 72°C for 40 sec for 36 cycles. PCR was performed using the Taq Polymerase Master Mix (Qiagen, Inc.). The PCR products were visualized and photographed under UV illumination. The primer sequences used were as follows: IL-6 (628 bp), 5′-ATG AAC TCC TTC TCC ACA AGC GC-3′ (sense) and 5′-G AAG AGC CCT CAG GCT GGA CTG-3′ (antisense); IL-8 (295 bp), 5′-ACT TCC AAG CTG GCC GTG GCT CTC TTG GCA-3′ (sense) and 5′ TGA ATT CTC AGC CCT CTT CAA AAA CTT CTC-3′ (antisense).
Detection of PCNA and cyclin D1 by western blotting
Expression of PCNA and cyclin D1 proteins was analyzed in CaCo2 cells. After treatment with PBIT and PBI-Se for 24 h, cells were harvested and lysed in lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)] on ice. After centrifugation, supernatants were collected and the protein content was measured using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. Equal amounts of protein from each extract were separated via polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) in 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) using the Bio-Rad electrotransfer system. Blots were blocked by incubating in 5% milk with Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h at room temperature and probed overnight at 4°C with rabbit anti-cyclin D1 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for cyclin D1 protein and mouse anti-PCNA monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for PCNA. Antibodies were diluted 1:1,000 with 5% milk in Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 0.1% Tween-20. The immunoblots were then probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG for cyclin D1 and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG for PCNA [1:2,000 diluted with 5% milk in Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)]. After the final wash, the signal was detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA).
In vivo experiments
Animals, diet and care
All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the NIH guidelines and the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved protocol. Male F344 rats were obtained from Harlan Laboratories, housed under standardized conditions (21°C, 60% relative humidity, 12 h light/12 h dark cycle, 20 air changes/h), and fed a standard laboratory rodent chow and drinking water through reverse osmosis until initiation of the experiment. Prepared diets were based on the modified AIN-76A containing 5% corn oil by weight (American Institute of Nutrition). The experimental diets contained 0.001% (10 ppm) or 0.002% (20 ppm) PBI-Se. PBI-Se was premixed with a small quantity of casein and then blended into the bulk diet using a Hobart Mixer. Both control and experimental diets were prepared weekly and stored in a cold room. Rats were allowed ad libitum access to the respective diets and tap water.
Experimental design for the efficacy of PBI-Se
The experiment was designed to evaluate the efficacy of 0, 10 and 20 ppm of PBI-Se administered continuously starting 3 days after carcinogen treatment. The dose selection was based on our maximum tolerated dose (MTD) study. At 7 weeks of age, groups of rats [n=12 rats per treatment group, 12 AOM-treated plus 6 vehicle (saline)-treated] were fed the control diet. At 8 weeks of age, rats intended for carcinogen treatment were injected s.c. with azoxymethane (AOM; Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, MO, USA) at a dose rate of 15 mg/kg body weight once weekly for 2 weeks, and those intended for vehicle treatment received an equal volume of normal saline. The experimental diets were initiated 3 days later and continued until termination of the experiment 8 weeks later (Fig. 1). Rats were sacrificed by CO2 euthanasia, and all organs were examined grossly. Colons were evaluated for aberrant crypt foci (ACF). For this evaluation, they were slit open lengthwise from the anus to the ceacum and then fixed flat with the mucosa on the upper side between filter papers in 10% buffered formalin.
Quantification of ACF
Topographical analysis of the colonic mucosa was carried out according to Bird (22) and our previous report (23). After a minimum of 24 h, fixed colons were stained with 0.2% methylene blue solution for 5–10 min, placed mucosal side up on a microscopic slide, and viewed under a light microscope. The total number of ACF in the entire colon was determined in every 2-cm section of the colon, starting from the distal (taken as 0 cm) to the proximal end of the colon. Aberrant crypts were distinguished from the surrounding normal crypts by their increased size, increased distance of cells from lamina to basal surfaces, and easily discernible pericryptal zone. The variables used to assess the aberrant crypts were incidence and multiplicity. Aberrant crypt multiplicity was determined as the number of crypts in each focus and categorized as containing up to 4 or more aberrant crypts per focus.
Giemsa staining of the spleens
Spleens from untreated and treated animals were fixed in formalin, sectioned (4 μm), and stained with Giemsa to enumerate the number of polymorphic nuclear cells (PMNs). The percentages of PMNs were calculated relative to control untreated spleens.
Statistical analysis
All the results are reported as the means ± SE. Statistical differences between control and treated groups were evaluated using the unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. Differences between groups were considered significant at P<0.05.
Results
Effect of PBIT and PBI-Se on the proliferation of Caco2 cells
Caco2 cells were exposed for 24 h in the presence or absence of a cytokine mixture (IL-1β, TNFα + IFNγ), or to LPS and to PBIT (0–100 μM) or PBI-Se (1–12 μM). As shown in Fig. 2A and B, both iNOS inhibitors caused dose-dependent growth inhibition as determined using a Trypan blue dye exclusion assay. After 24 h of exposure, 50% inhibition of cell growth was achieved at 40 μM PBIT or at 4 μM PBI-Se. PBI-Se induced significant toxicity in Caco2 cells at or above 6 μM, whereas PBIT induced significant toxicity at or above 60 μM. These results demonstrate that PBI-Se is more potent than PBIT.
Effect of PBI-Se and PBIT on apoptosis in Caco2 cells
We observed apoptotic bodies by staining the cells exposed to PBIT or PBI-Se with ethidium bromide and acridine orange. The population of apoptotic cells was enhanced significantly (P<0.0002) in the PBI-Se-treated cells. As shown in Fig. 2D PBI-Se induced apoptosis in Caco2 cells in a dose-dependent manner (5.6% at 2 μM, 24% at 4 μM and 60% at 6 μM vs. the untreated cells).
Effect of PBI-Se and PBIT on IL-6 and IL-8 in Caco2 cells induced with a cytokine mixture
The inflammatory cytokine response (IL-6 and IL-8) was measured in 3-week cultured Caco-2 cells induced with the cytokine mixture (TNFα plus IL-1β + IFNγ). We identified basal IL-8 production in CaCo2 cells, whereas no IL-6 production was noted in the control cells (in the absence of stimulation with the cytokine mixture). As shown in Fig. 3A, stimulation with the cytokine mixture for 24 h caused a significant induction in IL-6 and ~50-fold increase in IL-8. Treatment with PBIT (30 and 60 μM) significantly decreased IL-6 at both doses tested, whereas treatment with PBI-Se caused a significant dose-dependent increase in cytokine-induced IL-6. There was no blockage of IL-8 by either drug. Taken together, the results indicate that inflammatory responses are increased by treatment of Caco-2 cells with the cytokine mixture and that PBIT, but not PBI-Se, can block the IL-6 component of the response.
Effect of PBI-Se and PBIT on expression of IL-6 and IL-8 in CaCo2 cells induced with LPS
We also incubated CaCo2 cells with LPS, in the presence or absence of NOS inhibitors PBIT or PBI-Se for 24 h. PBIT significantly attenuated the LPS-induced IL-6 and IL-8 production in a dose-dependent manner. PBI-Se also dose-dependently attenuated LPS-stimulated IL-6 production but not LPS-stimulated IL-8 production (Fig. 3B), whereas, both the drugs decreased endogenous production of IL-8 in CaCo2 cells (Fig. 3C).
Effect of PBI-Se and PBIT on iNOS and cyclin D1 in CaCo2 cells
A significant dose-dependent decrease in cyclin D1 protein expression was observed with both iNOS inhibitors, suggesting inhibition of cell cycle progression (Fig. 3D). As expected, treatment of Caco2 cells with PBI-Se and PBIT caused a significant inhibition of cytokine-induced iNOS protein expression (Fig. 3E).
Effect of PBI-Se on ACF formation in rats
An initial examination of the effect of PBI-Se on AOM-induced colon carcinogenesis was carried out in rats. Efficacy endpoints used were inhibition of total ACF number as well as reduction in the number of multicrypt clusters (4 or more) of aberrant crypts. Rats that were treated with saline and fed the control or experimental diets showed no evidence of ACF formation in the colon (data not shown). In rats fed the control diet, AOM treatment induced, on average, ~130 ACF/colon, out of which 32 foci contained multiple (4 or more) aberrant crypts/focus (Fig. 4A). ACF were observed predominantly in the distal colons. PBI-Se was found to be an effective inhibitor of total ACF/colon (32–41%, P<0.001) and of multicrypt clusters containing 4 or more crypts/focus (29–47%, P<0.001) (Fig. 4B).
Effect of PBI-Se on PMNs in spleen
Selenium is essential for cell mediated immunity which includes destruction of neoplastic cells (24). Hence, the effect of selenium in the diet on the number of PMNs was analyzed in the spleens of rats fed with the PBI-Se diet. Supplementation of rat diets with PBI-Se increased the percentage of PMNs in the spleens (P<0.002; Fig. 4C and D).
Discussion
In a quest to identify and characterize better compounds for chemoprevention, an isosteric selenium analog of the known iNOS inhibitor PBIT, was synthesized and tested in vitro and in vivo along with PBIT for comparison. PBI-Se and PBIT both caused a decrease in proliferation of Caco2 intestinal epithelial cells attributable to inhibition of DNA synthesis (Fig. 2). The IC50 for inhibition by PBI-Se was 3–4 μM, which is consistent with previously published data showing growth inhibition in melanoma cell lines (25). Cell cycle arrest can be achieved by a decrease in the levels of cyclins and/or associated cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) (26) and this is evident in the Caco2 cell line by a decrease in cyclin D1 protein expression with both PBI-Se and PBIT (Fig. 3D).
Intestinal epithelial cells have the potential to express and secrete a wide array of inflammatory cytokines (including chemokines such as IL-8), which may function as signals to neighboring immune and inflammatory cells, initiating and amplifying an ongoing acute immune response (27–29). Numerous studies have shown that IL-8 and iNOS may be expressed in a variety of cells in the setting of inflammation. It has been reported that selenium supplementation in individuals results in induction of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-8, superoxide dismutase (SOD)2, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2 (CXCL2) and several other immunological and oxidative stress-related genes (30). IL-8 was reported to inhibit significantly the growth of intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumors induced by transplantation of K562 cells and to induce cell death by apoptosis in these cells in vivo(31,32). IL-8 production can be increased after stimulation with a mixture of IL-1β, IFNγ and TNFα in a variety of cells (33,34).
Previous studies also demonstrated that Caco-2 cells grown in a non-co-culture system increased IL-8 protein and mRNA in response to a wide range of LPS concentrations (20). We observed high endogenous expression of IL-8 in unstimulated Caco2 cells and enhanced expression when the cells were stimulated with a mixture of IL-1β, IFNγ and TNFα or with LPS (Fig. 3A and B). Both PBIT and PBI-Se inhibited control endogenous IL-8 production (Fig. 3C). PBIT inhibited LPS-stimulated IL-8 production but not the cytokine-stimulated IL-8 production, whereas comparable growth inhibitory concentrations of PBI-Se did not decrease IL-8 in either stimulation condition (Fig. 3A and B). These results suggest that LPS and proinflammatory cytokines use different cell signaling pathways in colon cancer epithelial cells and that PBI-Se, unlike PBIT, does not interfere with LPS-enhanced IL-8 production. The induction of IL-8 has important biologic consequences for control of tumor growth. Lee et al(35) showed that the introduction of IL-8, a chemo-attractant for neutrophils, basophils and a subset of T-cells, into human ovarian tumors resulted in massive granulocytic and monocytic infiltration and subsequent reduction or elimination of tumor growth. Very high levels of IL-8 can be associated with increased risk of death (36) (in which cases, PBIT but not PBI-Se might be efficacious in decreasing the toxicity). IL-8 is an important mediator of the innate immune system response and maintenance of this chemokine by PBI-Se but not PBIT in the presence of LPS supports previous findings of the beneficial effects of selenium on the immune system. The results also are consistent with the observation that people with acute and severe illness who develop inflammation and widespread infection often have decreased levels of selenium in their blood (37).
A more dramatic difference between PBI-Se and PBIT was observed in their effects on IL-6 production. PBIT decreased both LPS- and cytokine-stimulated IL-6 production. At comparable growth inhibitory concentrations, PBI-Se had a significant effect on the large LPS-induced IL-6 production and actually increased the lesser cytokine-induced IL-6 production. IL-6 is one of the major mediators of the inflammatory response and is implicated in inflammation, tumor growth and angiogenesis. In patients with active ulcerative colitis, there are increased concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8 in the mucosa (38). These results suggest that PBI-Se is able to inhibit only the LPS-induced activation pathway. These divergent effects of PBIT and PBI-Se on IL-6 production require further investigation but suggest that PBI-Se and PBIT have different mechanisms of action and may have different chemopreventive/therapeutic niches. Blunting production of proinflammatory cytokines and/or enhancing anti-inflammatory factors to obtain a balance may become very important. Our results confirm previous findings that show that PBIT suppressed the inducible isoforms of NOS and cyclooxygenase (COX) and also that PBI-Se was effective in inhibiting both iNOS and cyclin D1. These two agents demonstrate that they reduce inflammatory responses in intestinal epithelial cells.
There is a great deal of evidence indicating that selenium supplementation at high levels reduces the incidence of cancer in animals. More than two-thirds of over 100 published studies in 20 different animal models of spontaneous, viral, and chemically induced cancers found that selenium supplementation significantly reduces tumor incidence (39). Observational studies indicate that death from cancer, including lung, colorectal and prostate cancers, is lower among people with higher blood levels or intake of selenium (40–46). The incidence of prostate, colorectal and lung cancer was notably lower in the group given selenium supplements (47). In the present study, PBI-Se was more potent than PBIT at inhibiting Caco2 growth in vitro and administration of PBI-Se provided up to 41% inhibition of AOM-induced total ACF formation, and suppression in growth of foci with 4 or more crypts by ≥47%. These results clearly support the potential colon tumor inhibitory properties of PBI-Se (Fig. 4A and B). However, a previous study showed that dietary administration of Se-free PBIT at 50 ppm could suppress the total number of ACF/colon by ~58% and aberrant crypt multiplicities by 78%, compared with a control diet (18). Although differential inhibition of IL-6 and IL-8 by the two inhibitors may contribute to the apparent reversal in order of efficacy of the two iNOS inhibitors in vivo, the difference may be due to different experimental designs. In the present study, animals were fed PBI-Se after the AOM injections, whereas in the previous study, PBIT was administered before AOM treatments. Also, the PBI-Se dose used here post-initiation was 50% less than the dose of PBIT used previously in the chemoprevention protocol. Our pre-clinical results are consistent with previous clinical observations with other forms of selenium (selenomethionine) showing lowered risk of developing prostate, lung and colorectal cancer in a large scale cancer prevention trial (48). Although the exact mechanism by which PBI-Se acts cannot be determined, the present findings highlight the need for further research on the potential interactions between epithelial cells and immune cells under different inflammatory conditions with activation of varied signaling pathways.
Certain breakdown products of selenium have been suggested to prevent tumor growth by enhancing immune cell activity and suppressing development of blood vessels to the tumor (49). There is accumulating evidence that selenium deficiency may contribute to the development of a form of heart disease, hypothyroidism, and a weakened immune system (50,51). At the doses used, the selenium in PBI-Se may have enhanced immune system function and affected carcinogen metabolism. Selenium is an essential component of thyroid metabolism and antioxidant defense, as well as immune function. It appears to improve activation and proliferation of B-lymphocytes and to enhance T-cell function. It is also involved in several key metabolic activities through selenoprotein enzymes that protect against oxidative damage (52). In one randomized study of free-living, healthy humans (57–84 years of age), those given 400 mcg/day of selenium for 6 months had a 65% increase in T cells, particularly CD4 cells, and a 58% increase in NK cell cytotoxicity (53). Studies on the effects of selenium deficiency on HIV connected selenium levels to T cell function and apoptosis suggesting that selenium may enhance resistance to infection by modulating IL production and T helper cell responses (54). The increased number of PMNs in the PBI-Se-treated rat spleens suggests an effect on immune cells which may have an important role in inducing apoptotic effects in the colon cancer cells.
Recently, a large randomized, placebo-controlled intervention study, the SELECT study, found that 200 mcg/day of selenium did not alter the risk of prostate cancer (55). However, a phase III clinical trial at NIH using selenium for chemoprevention therapy to try to prevent the development of neoplasia in the prostate is underway. Animal studies suggest that mammary tumors are significantly reduced by selenium, and a study in women that should yield more definitive information on this relationship is presently underway (56). The present study shows that PBI-Se is a more potent growth inhibitory agent in vitro than its isosteric sulfur analog PBIT and that it does not decrease cytokine- or LPS-stimulated IL-8 production. Both in vivo and in vitro data support the development of PBI-Se for prevention and treatment of colon cancer.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr Julie Sando for her valuable suggestions and for editing the article. The authors also thank the OUHSC Rodent Barrier Facility staff for their support for bioassay studies.
References
American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer key statistics. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/ColonandRectumCancer/DetailedGuidecolorectal-cancer-key-statistics. | |
Jackson JR, Seed MP, Kircher CH, Willoughby DA and Winkler JD: The codependence of angiogenesis and chronic inflammation. FASEB J. 11:457–465. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Phoa N and Epe B: Influence of nitric oxide on the generation and repair of oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells. Carcinogenesis. 23:469–475. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jaiswal M, LaRusso NF, Burgart LJ and Gores GJ: Inflammatory cytokines induce DNA damage and inhibit DNA repair in cholangiocarcinoma cells by a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res. 60:184–190. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Moore MA: Cytokine and chemokine networks influencing stem cell proliferation, differentiation, and marrow homing. J Cell Biochem. 38:29–38. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakajima N, Kuwayama H, Ito Y, Iwasaki A and Arakawa Y: Helicobacter pylori, neutrophils, interleukins, and gastric epithelial proliferation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 25:S198–S202. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Eberhart CE, Coffey RJ, Radhika A, Giardiello FM, Ferrenbach S and DuBois RN: Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression in human colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 107:1183–1188. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Rhodes JM and Campbell BJ: Inflammation and colorectal cancer: IBD-associated and sporadic cancer compared. Trends Mol Med. 8:10–16. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Keshavarzian A, Fusunyan RD, Jacyno M, Winship D, MacDermott RP and Sanderson IR: Increased interleukin-8 (IL-8) in rectal dialysate from patients with ulcerative colitis: evidence for a biological role for IL-8 in inflammation of the colon. Am J Gastroenterol. 94:704–712. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nusrat A, Sitaraman SV and Neish A: Interaction of bacteria and bacterial toxins with intestinal epithelial cells. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 3:392–398. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weiss HA and Forman D: Aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and protection from colorectal cancer: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Scand J Gastroenterol. 220:137–141. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jenkins DC, Charles IG, Thomsen LL, et al: Roles of nitric oxide in tumour growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:4392–4396. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ambs S, Merriam WG, Bennett WP, et al: Frequent nitric oxide synthase-2 expression in human colon adenomas: implication for tumour angiogenesis and colon cancer progression. Cancer Res. 58:334–341. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jobin C, Haskill S, Mayer L, Panja A and Sartor RB: Evidence for altered regulation of I kappa B alpha degradation in human colonic cells. J Immunol. 158:226–234. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Knowles RG and Moncada S: Nitric oxide synthases in mammals. Biochem J. 298:249–258. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Forstermann U, Gath I, Schwarz P, Closs EI and Kleinert H: Isoforms of nitric oxide synthase. Properties, cellular distribution and expressional control. Biochem Pharmacol. 50:1321–1332. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pana MH and Ho CT: Chemopreventive effects of natural dietary compounds on cancer development. Chem Soc Rev. 37:2558–2574. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rao CV, Kawamori T, Hamid R and Reddy BS: Chemoprevention of colonic aberrant crypt foci by an inducible nitric oxide synthase-selective inhibitor. Carcinogenesis. 2:641–644. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Briske-Anderson MJ, Finley JW and Newman SM: The influence of culture time and passage number on the morphological and physiological development of CaCo2 cells. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 214:248–257. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang Y, Li N, Liboni K and Neu J: Glutamine decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced IL-8 production in Caco-2 cells through a non-NF-kappaB p50 mechanism. Cytokine. 22:77–83. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chittezhath M, Deep G, Singh RP, Agarwal C and Agarwal R: Silibinin inhibits cytokine-induced STATs, MAPKs, NF-κB and AP-1 activation, and down-regulates HIF-1α and iNOS in human lung carcinoma A549 cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 7:1817–1826. 2008. | |
Bird RP: Observation and quantification of aberrant crypts in the murine colon treated with a colon carcinogen: preliminary findings. Cancer Lett. 37:147–151. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Janakiram NB, Mohammed A, Zhang Y, Choi CI, Woodward C, Collin P, Steele VE and Rao CV: Chemopreventive effects of Frondanol A5, a Cucumaria frondosa extract, against rat colon carcinogenesis and inhibition of human colon cancer cell growth. Cancer Prev Res. 3:82–91. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Arthur JR, McKenzie RC and Beckett GJ: Selenium in the immune system. J Nutr. 133:S1457–S1459. 2003. | |
Chung CY, Madhunapantula SV, Desai D, Amin S and Robertson GP: Melanoma prevention using topical PBI-Se. Cancer Prev Res. 4:935–948. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vermeulen K, Van Bockstaele DR and Berneman ZN: The cell cycle: a review of regulation, deregulation and therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell Prolif. 36:131–149. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fusunyan RD, Quinn JJ, Fujimoto M, MacDermott RP and Sanderson IR: Butyrate switches the pattern of chemokine secretion by intestinal epithelial cells through histone acetylation. Mol Med. 5:631–640. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ogle CK, Guo XL, Hasselgren PO, Ogle JD and Alexander JW: The gut as a source of inflammatory cytokines after stimulation with endotoxin. Eur J Surg. 163:45–51. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Haller D, Bode C, Hammes WP, Pfeifer AMA, Schiffrin EJ and Blum S: Non-pathogenic bacteria elicit a differential cytokine response by intestinal epithelial cell/leucocyte co-cultures. Gut. 47:79–87. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kibriya MG, Jasmine F, Argos M, Verret WJ, Rakibuz-Zaman M, Ahmed A, Parvez F and Ahsan H: Changes in gene expression profiles in response to selenium supplementation among individuals with arsenic-induced pre-malignant skin lesions. Toxicol Lett. 169:162–176. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Terui Y, Ikeda M, Tomizuka H, et al: Identification of a novel apoptosis-inducing factor derived from leukemic cells: endothelial interleukin-8, but not monocyte-derived, induces apoptosis in leukemic cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 243:407–411. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Terui Y, Ikeda M, Tomizuka H, et al: Activated endothelial cells induce apoptosis in leukemic cells by endothelial interleukin-8. Blood. 92:2672–2680. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoffmann E, Dittrich-Breiholz O, Holtmann H and Kracht M: Multiple control of interleukin-8 gene expression. J Leukoc Biol. 72:847–855. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Garat C and Arend WP: Intracellular IL-1Ra type 1 inhibits IL-1-induced IL-6 and IL-8 production in Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells through inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and NF-kappaB pathways. Cytokine. 23:31–40. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lee Li-F, Hellendall RP, Wang Y, Stephen Haskill J, Mukaida N, Matsushima K and Ting JP: IL-8 reduced tumorigenicity of human ovarian cancer in vivo due to neutrophil infiltration. J Immunol. 164:2769–2775. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Molica S, Vitelli G, Levato D, Levato L, Datillo A and Gandolfo GM: Clinico-biological implications of increased serum levels of interleukin −8 in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica. 84:208–211. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gartner R, Albrich W and Angstwurm MW: The effect of a selenium supplementation on the outcome of patients with severe systemic inflammation, burn, and trauma. Biofactors. 14:199–204. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Murata Y, Ishiguro Y, Itoh J, Munakata A and Yoshida Y: The role of pro-inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am J. 30:56–60. 1995. | |
Combs GF Jr and Gray WP: Chemopreventive agents: selenium. Pharmacol Ther. 79:179–192. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Russo MW, Murray SC, Wurzelmann JI, Woosley JT and Sandler RS: Plasma selenium levels and the risk of colorectal adenomas. Nutr Cancer. 28:125–129. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Patterson BH and Levander OA: Naturally occurring selenium compounds in cancer chemoprevention trials: a workshop summary. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 6:63–69. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Knekt P, Marniemi J, Teppo L, Heliovaara M and Aromaa A: Is low selenium status a risk factor for lung cancer? Am J Epidemiol. 148:975–982. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fleet JC: Dietary selenium repletion may reduce cancer incidence in people at high risk who live in areas with low soil selenium. Nutr Rev. 55:277–279. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shamberger RJ: The genotoxicity of selenium. Mutat Res. 154:28–48. 1985. | |
Young KL and Lee PN: Intervention studies on cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 8:91–103. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Burguera JL, Burguera M, Gallignani M, Alarcon OM and Burgueera JA: Blood serum selenium in the province of Merida, Venezuela, related to sex, cancer incidence and soil selenium content. J Trace Elem Electrolytes Health Dis. 4:73–77. 1990.PubMed/NCBI | |
Combs GF Jr, Clark LC and Turnbull BW: Reduction of cancer risk with an oral supplement of selenium. Biomed Environ Sci. 10:227–234. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Clark LC, Combs GF Jr, Turnbull BW, et al: Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 276:1957–1963. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Combs GF Jr, Clark LC and Turnbull BW: An analysis of cancer prevention by selenium. Biofactors. 14:153–159. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Combs GF Jr: Food system-based approaches to improving micronutrient nutrition: the case for selenium. Biofactors. 12:39–43. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zimmerman MB and Kohrle J: The impact of iron and selenium deficiencies on iodine and thyroid metabolism: biochemistry and relevance to public health. Thyroid. 12:867–878. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ryan-Harshman M and Aldoori W: The relevance of selenium to immunity, cancer and infectious/inflammatory diseases. Can J Diet Pract Res. 66:98–102. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wood SM, Beckham C, Yosioka A, Darban H and Watson RR: Beta-carotene and selenium supplementation enhances immune response in aged humans. Integr Med. 2:85–92. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baum MK, Miguez-Burbano MJ, Campa A and Shor-Posner G: Selenium and interleukins in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Infect Dis. 182:S69–S73. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lippman SM, Klein EA, Goodman PJ, et al: Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). JAMA. 301:39–51. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Whanger PD: Selenium and its relationship to cancer: an update. Br J Nutr. 91:11–28. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |