miR-139 regulates the proliferation and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma through the WNT/TCF-4 pathway
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 1, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2831
- Pages: 397-404
Abstract
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common types of primary cancers in the world (1), ranking as the sixth most prevalent cancer and the third most frequent cause of cancer-related mortality (2). HCC has a poor 5-year survival rate of ~7% despite treatment (3). Potentially curative therapies, including liver transplantation and surgical resection, are only applied to a minority of patients due to a high rate of advanced-stage disease at the time of diagnosis and the lack of suitable organ donors. Other regional treatments may be beneficial for unresectable HCC, but local failure or recurrences are frequent, and the long term survival rate remains poor. The development of innovative, targeted therapies may represent an alternative for the treatment of these cancers.
microRNAs (miRNAs) are an evolutionarily conserved novel class of endogenous small non-coding RNAs present extensively in eukaryotes, that were first discovered in a 1994 investigation into eelworms (4,5). Most of the miRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II as primary miRNAs and are processed by the RNase III enzymes Drosha and Dicer to produce 21- to 23-nucleotide double-stranded RNA duplexes (6,7). These smaller RNAs are then exported to the cytoplasm by Exportin-5, where they are subsequently processed into mature miRNAs by Dicer (8). The mature miRNAs are loaded into the miRNA-induced silencing complex, where they recognize their target protein-coding mRNAs to inhibit mostly mRNA translation or degradation by base pairing to complementary sequences within the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) (9). With respect to miRNA functions, they play pivotal roles in pathophysiological processes such as apoptosis, cell differentiation, cell proliferation and organ development (10). Functionally speaking, several human diseases have now been associated with dysregulated miRNA expression.
The oncogenic activity associated with Wnt signaling was first recognized by the ability of Wnt-1 to promote tumor formation when ectopically expressed in mouse mammary tissue (11,12). Paradoxically, Wnt ligands themselves have never been formally implicated in contributing to human cancers. However, 2 tumor suppressors in the Wnt pathway, Axin and APC, and the proto-oncogene β-catenin, are commonly mutated in a variety of human neoplasms (12,13). Mutations in these genes deregulate the Wnt pathway by stabilizing β-catenin. Normally associated with cadherins at the plasma membrane, the uncomplexed form of β-catenin is stabilized in response to Wnt signaling and forms complexes with transcription factors of the TCF/LEF family (14). These HMG domain-containing transcription factors contain high affinity binding sites for β-catenin in their extreme N-terminal regions (15), and the bound β-catenin recruits various accessories essential for gene activation (16–18). A hallmark of Wnt signaling in cancer is the stabilization and/or mislocalization of β-catenin, which presumably exerts its oncogenic effect by exacerbating the transcription of growth controlling genes.
TCF-4 promotes initiation and progression of many types of cancers. TCF-4 binds to β-catenin to transactivate Wnt target genes (19). However, in the absence of β-catenin, TCF-4 becomes a repressor of transcription of those target genes via binding to corepressors (20). This characteristic may explain the apparently inconsistent findings that TCF-4 can either promote or repress breast cancer progression in different cellular contexts. We previously showed that TCF-4 binds to a metastasis-inducing DNA sequence (21). This results in a reduction in the amount of TCF-4 available to regulate the expression of endogenous genes, leading to a decrease in metastatic development (22).
The present study aimed to investigate whether miRNAs are involved in the regulation of HCC apoptosis. In this study, we focused on miR-139. Using qRT-PCR techniques, both our HCC patient tissue samples and cancer cell lines had lower miR-139 expression levels, as predicted. Furthermore, overexpression of miR-139 was involved in decreased HCC proliferation and invasion and induction of apoptosis. TCF-4 was found to have binding sites for miR-139 in the 3′UTR region. We demonstrated that TCF-4 is a direct target of miR-139. These findings suggest that miR-139 may act as a biomarker in HCC and that upregulation of miR-139 is a possible therapeutic approach for HCC that merits further evaluation.
Materials and methods
Tissue samples and clinical data
Informed consent was obtained for the use of 50 human HCC tissue samples from adult patients diagnosed with HCC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China. This study was approved by the hospital institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Cell culture and transfection
The human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK293), the human HCC cell lines, HepG2, Hep3B, SMMC7721, and the normal liver cell line HL7702, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA), and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 IU/ml penicillin/streptomycin in a 37°C humidified incubator with 5% CO2.
Plasmids and oligonucleotides
The hsa-miR-139 inhibitor and mimics were chemically synthesized and purified by high-performance liquid chromatography (GenePharma, Shanghai, China). The hsa-miR-139 mimics included the following: sense, 5′-GGA GAC GCG GCC CUG UUG GAG U-3′ and antisense, 5′-UCC AAC AGG GCC GCG UCU CCU C-3′. The hsa-miR-139 inhibitor was 5′-CUU CCA ACA GGG CCG CGU CUC C-3′. The microRNA mimic controls were 5′-GGA GAC GCG GCC CUG UUC GAG U-3′ and 5′-TCG AAC AGG GCC GCG UCU CCU C-3′. The microRNA inhibitor control was 5′-UUG UCA CAA ACU AAA GUA CUG-3′. The miR-139 mimic, inhibitor or their respective control (40 nM) was transfected into cells using Lipofectamine™ 2000 reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in serum-free conditions for 6 h before replacing with complete medium. The efficiency of transfection was determined using a Leica DMIRE2 microscope system (Leica Microsystems, Montreal, QC, Canada). RNA and protein were collected 48 and 72 h after transfection, respectively.
qRT-PCR
To assess the expression of miRNA-139 in HCC tissues and cell line, qRT-PCR was carried out using the ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). For detecting mature miR-139, reverse transcription and quantitative PCR were performed using the Hairpin-it™ miRNAs qPCR Quantitation kit (GenePharma). U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) expression was assayed for normalization. The thermal cycling conditions for miR-139 and U6 snRNA consisted of 95°C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 12 sec and 62°C for 1 min. To detect TCF-4 mRNA expression, the RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (MBI Fermentas, Burlington, ON, Canada) and SYBR® Premix ExTaq™ II (Takara Bio, Inc., Dalian, China) were used. TCF-4 (forward primer, 5′-GGC TAT GCA GGA ATG TTG GG-3′ and reverse primer, 5′-GTT CAT GTG GAT GCA GGC TAC-3′), and reference gene GAPDH (forward primer, 5′-CTG GGC TAC ACT GAG CAC C-3′ and reverse primer, 5′-AAG TGG TCG TTG AGG GCA ATG-3′) were generated and optimized to an equal annealing temperature of 60°C. The conditions for the TCF-4 and GAPDH reaction mixtures were 95°C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min and finally 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 1 min, 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 15 sec. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Analysis of relative miR-139 or TCF-4 mRNA expression was performed using the comparative Ct method with U6 and GAPDH snRNA as endogenous controls, respectively.
Proliferation assay
Following transfection with miR-139, an MTT assay was used to quantitate the cell viability of human HCC cells. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. The absorbance values of each well were measured with a microplate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at 450 nm. The proliferation analysis of each group in each individual experiment and the whole experiment process were performed in triplicate.
Cell apoptosis analysis
For cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry (FCM), transfected and control cells in the log phase of growth were harvested by trypsinization, and washed with PBS. Nuclei of cells were then stained with Annexin V and PI for 30 min. A total of 104 nuclei was examined in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Experiments were performed in triplicate.
In vitro invasion assays
Transwell membranes coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) were used to quantify in vitro HCC cell invasion. Transfected cells were plated at 5×104/well in the upper chamber in serum-free medium. Medium containing 20% FBS was added to the lower chamber. Following a 24-h incubation, non-invading cells were removed from the top well with a cotton swab while the bottom cells were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde, stained with 0.1% crystal violet, and photographed in 3 independent ×100 fields for each well. The fold-change in migration was calculated relative to the blank control. The data are represented as the means ± SD for 3 independent experiments.
Luciferase reporter assay
The 3′UTR of the human TCF-4 gene was PCR amplified using the following primers: TCF-4 forward, 5′-TCT AGA GGA TTA ACT AAT TGA AGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCT AGA CAG TAA GAA CAT AAG AAC ATC T-3′. They were then cloned downstream of the Renilla luciferase stop codon in the pGL3 control vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), giving rise to the p′UTR-TCF-4 plasmids. These constructs were used to generate, by inverse PCR, the p3′UTRmut-TCF-4 plasmid (primers: forward, 5′-ATT TGG AGG CTA TTT CAA GTT GAA AAA AGG AAA TGT AAA GTA A-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTA CTT TAC ATT TCC TTT TTT CAA CTT GAA ATA GCC TCC AAA T-3′). HEK293 cells were cotransfected with 1 mg of p3′UTRTCF-4 and with p30UTRmut-TCF-4 plasmids and 1 mg of a Renilla luciferase expression construct, pRL-TK (Promega Corporation), using Lipofectamine™ 2000 reagent. Cells were harvested 24 h post-transfection and assayed with Dual-Luciferase assay (Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Three independent experiments were performed in triplicate.
Western blotting
For whole protein extracts, liver tissue samples after grinding were homogenized in lysis buffer (Promega Corporation), incubated for 30 min on ice, and then centrifuged for 15 min at 14,000 × g. Prior to use, all buffers were treated with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Konchem, China). Equal amounts of protein were separated discontinuously on 12–15% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, USA). The antibodies employed included anti-TCF-4, anti-cyclin D1, anti-c-Myc, anti-MMP-2, anti-MMP-9 (all from Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Immunoblots were developed using anti-mouse or anti-rabbit HRP secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), followed by detection with Immobilon Western Blotting Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions by FX Fusion (Vilbert, France). For all western blottings, GAPDH was used as a reference gene.
Nude mouse tumor xenograft model and miR-139 treatment
HepG2 HCC cells were subcutaneously injected into 5-week-old female nude mice (Cancer Institute of the Chinese Academy of Medical Science). When the tumor volume reached 50 mm3, mice were randomly divided into 2 groups (8 mice/group). Each group was treated with miR-139 or a miR-CON oligo in 100 μl Lipofectamine through local injection of the xenograft tumor at multiple sites. The treatment was performed once every 3 days for 24 days. The tumor volume was measured with a caliper twice/week, using the following formula: Tumor size = ab2/2, where a is the larger and b is the smaller of the 2 dimensions.
Statistical analysis
Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used to determine statistical significance. All error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to test the association between miR-139 and TCF-4 in the normal vs. tumor groups. Statistical significance for all the tests, as assessed by calculating the P-value, was <0.05.
Results
miR-139 is downregulated in HCC tissues and cancer cells
In the present study, we aimed to ascertain whether miR-139 has an effect on HCC. miR-139 expression in primary HCC tumors and normal liver tissues was assessed by qRT-PCR. Fig. 1A shows that miR-139 was highly expressed in normal liver tissues when compared with the expression in the low-grade primary HCC tumors. We also examined the expression levels of miR-139 in the HCC cell lines HepG2, SMMC7721, Hep3B and in the normal liver cell line HL7702 (Fig. 1B). These cell lines demonstrated the same expression patterns as miR-139 in the liver sample tissues.
Upregulation of miR-139 inhibits HCC cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo
To explore the role of miR-139 in proliferation, we used an overexpression approach. An miR-139 oligonucleotide was used to overexpress miR-139 in HepG2 and Hep3B cells. Transient transfection of miR-139 led to the upregulation of miR-139 expression as determined by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2A). A significant decrease in cell viability was observed over time in HCC cells that exhibited high miR-139 expression (Fig. 2B) when compared to the cells expressing control levels of miR (miR-CON) as determined by the MTT assay. Furthermore, overexpression of miR-139 significantly suppressed the tumorigenicity of HCC cells in nude mice (Fig. 2C). These observations suggest that miR-139 upregulation suppresses the proliferation of HCC in vitro and in vivo.
miR-139 overexpression inhibits invasion and induces apoptosis in HCC cells
To assess the role of miR-139 in the cell invasion of HCC, we used Transwell assays. miR-139 overexpression decreased the invasiveness of HepG2 and Hep3B cells when compared to the miR-CON (Fig. 3A and B). In addition, we assessed apoptosis in the control and miR-139-transfected cells by flow cytometric analysis of Annexin V-PI stained HepG2 and Hep3B cells (Fig. 3C and D). In both cell lines, the average apoptotic cell fractions (early apoptotic + apoptotic) were significantly increased following transfection with miR-139 when compared to the miR-CON (P<0.05). This finding points to a pro-apoptotic role of miR-139 and suggests that miR-139 affects apoptosis while regulating tumorigenicity. Together, these data demonstrate that miR-139 impacts the tumorigenic properties of HCC cells both in vitro and in vivo.
miR-139 downregulates TCF-4 expression by targeting its 3′UTR
To identify miR-139 targets, we performed a bioinformatics search (Targetscan, Pictar, RNhybrid) for putative mRNA targets of miR-139. Among the candidate targets, 3′UTR of human TCF-4 (nucleotides 5311–5324; NM_001243226) contained regions that matched the seed sequences of hsa-miR-139 (Fig. 4A). To verify that TCF-4 is a direct target of miR-139, TCF-4 3′UTR, containing the miR-139 binding sites, was cloned downstream of the luciferase open reading frame. These reporter constructs were used to transfect HEK293 cells, which express very low levels of miR-139 (Fig. 4B) and are highly transfectable. Increased expression of miR-139 upon transfection, as confirmed by qRT-PCR, significantly affected luciferase expression, measured as relative luciferase activity (Fig. 4C).
Conversely, when we performed the luciferase assays using a plasmid harboring the 3′UTR of TCF-4 mRNA, where the binding sites for miR-139 were inactivated by site-directed mutagenesis (miR-CON), we observed a consistent reduction in miR-139 inhibitory effect (Fig. 4C). To determine whether miR-139 affects TCF-4 expression in the HepG2 cellular environment, we analyzed the consequences of ectopic expression of miR-139 in HepG2 cells. Increased expression of miR-139 upon transfection was confirmed by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4D), and then the effects on endogenous levels of TCF-4 were analyzed by western blotting (Fig. 4E).
miR-139 overexpression significantly reduced the endogenous levels of TCF-4 when compared to HL7702 cells transfected with the scrambled miR-CON. Conversely, knockdown of miR-139 by anti-miR-139, confirmed by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4F) in HL7702 cells with high levels of endogenous miR-139, increased the protein levels of TCF-4 (Fig. 4G).
miR-139 overexpression suppresses the β-catenin/TCF-4 pathway
TCF-4 binds to β-catenin to transactivate Wnt target genes (19). The essential role of the β-catenin/TCF-4 pathway as a mediator of miR-139 activity was confirmed by qRT-PCR and western blot assays which revealed reduced relative expression of β-catenin, cyclin D1, c-Myc, MMP-2 and MMP-9 in cells displaying high miR-139 expression (Fig. 5A and B). These data suggest critical downstream roles for the β-catenin/TCF-4 pathways in miR-139-mediated cell biology.
Discussion
miRNAs participate in maintaining the balance of gene regulating networks that determine the fate of cells. Bioinformatics analysis has revealed that miRNAs control the expression of one-third of the human proteome (23). Deregulation of miRNAs, which is a frequent outcome in human cancer, weakens this balance, thereby contributing to cancer progression. In the present study, we focused on miR-139, which has been found in head and neck (24), lung (25) and colorectal cancer (26), oral squamous cell carcinoma (27) and pancreatic cancer (28). However, no report on the biological consequences of miR-139 dysregulation in HCC have been characterized.
We focused on miR-139 as a potential candidate miRNA anti-oncogene in HCC. We confirmed miR-139 expression levels in clinical HCC tissues using qRT-PCR. The expression level of miR-139 was significantly low in HCC, as observed in our samples (Fig. 1). Based on these results, we hypothesized that miR-139 may play an important role in HCC. To test this hypothesis, we performed functional analyses to examine the function of miR-139. We analyzed cells that had been transfected with miR-139. As expected, high expression of miR-139 inhibited cell proliferation and invasion in HCC cells. Cell apoptosis was also dramatically induced following miR-139 transfected. These results suggest that miR-139 may function as an anticancer gene and plays an important role in the inhibition of cell growth and invasion of HCC.
We used the miRanda algorithm to identify targets of miR-139, and we identified TCF-4 a potential candidate target related to tumor-suppression. In this study, we focused on TCF-4, which was identified by study of WNT pathway signals. We performed a 3′UTR luciferase assay and observed that luciferase activity was increased after co-transfection with the miR-139 inhibitor and a 3′UTR vector containing the TCF-4 miR-139 target sequence. TCF-4 protein expression was also significantly upregulated in HepG2 and Hep3B cells that were transfected with the miR-139 inhibitor, indicating that TCF-4 is a direct target of miR-139.
The Wnt pathway is an important target for the development of novel therapeutics for cancer (29). Activated β-catenin/TCF-4 signaling by accumulation of β-catenin in the nucleus has been implicated in human carcinogenesis, including HCC. This accumulation may result from mutation of the tumor-suppressor gene β-catenin itself. In the present study, we conducted a detailed mechanistic study to evaluate the efficacy of the inhibition of β-catenin/TCF-4 signaling by miR-139 in HCC using HCC cell lines. We constructed miR-139 vectors in order to knockdown the expression of TCF-4. Western blot analysis revealed a decrease in TCF-4 protein expression in HepG2 and Hep3B cells at 48 h post-infection with the respective miR-139 vectors. In addition, the miR-139 vector markedly suppressed β-catenin/TCF-4 transcriptional activity as well as the expression of 2 known target genes, Cyclin D1 and c-Myc, in HepG2 and Hep3B cells. These data indicate that miR-139 overexpression suppresses the β-catenin/TCF-4 activity in vitro.
In conclusion, this study revealed that the downregulation of miR-139 expression is a common event in HCC, and we provide evidence that miR-139 plays a role in regulating proliferation, invasion and apoptosis. miR-139 is able to inhibit TCF-4 protein expression through directly binding to the 3′UTR region of TCF-4 mRNA. The regulation of HCC growth, by upregulation of miR-139 expression may represent a novel therapeutic strategy for HCC.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 81071877), and the Fundamental Research Fund of Xi’an Jiaotong University (2010-01).
References
Cha C, DeMatteo RP and Blumgart LH: Surgery and ablative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol. 35(Suppl 2): S130–S137. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Forner A, Llovet JM and Bruix J: Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 379:1245–1255. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Carr BI: Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management and future trends. Gastroenterology. 127(Suppl 1): S218–S224. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cai X, Hagedorn CH and Cullen BR: Human microRNAs are processed from capped, polyadenylated transcripts that can also function as mRNAs. RNA. 10:1957–1966. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee Y, Kim M, Han J, et al: MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 23:4051–4060. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gregory RI, Yan KP, Amuthan G, et al: The microprocessor complex mediates the genesis of microRNAs. Nature. 432:235–240. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chendrimada TP, Gregory RI, Kumaraswamy E, et al: TRBP recruits the Dicer complex to Ago2 for microRNA processing and gene silencing. Nature. 436:740–744. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Han J, Lee Y, Yeom KH, et al: Molecular basis for the recognition of primary microRNAs by the Drosha-DGCR8 complex. Cell. 125:887–901. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Valencia-Sanchez MA, Liu J, Hannon GJ and Parker R: Control of translation and mRNA degradation by miRNAs and siRNAs. Genes Dev. 20:515–524. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Plasterk RH: Micro RNAs in animal development. Cell. 124:877–881. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nusse R and Varmus HE: Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell. 31:99–109. 1982. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Peifer M and Polakis P: Wnt signaling in oncogenesis and embryogenesis - a look outside the nucleus. Science. 287:1606–1609. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Giles RH, van Es JH and Clevers H: Caught up in a Wnt storm: Wnt signaling in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1653:1–24. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Nelson WJ and Nusse R: Convergence of Wnt, β-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science. 303:1483–1487. 2004. | |
Brantjes H, Barker N, van Es J and Clevers H: TCF: Lady Justice casting the final verdict on the outcome of Wnt signalling. Biol Chem. 383:255–261. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hecht A, Vleminckx K, Stemmler MP, van Roy F and Kemler R: The p300/CBP acetyltransferases function as transcriptional coactivators of β-catenin in vertebrates. EMBO J. 19:1839–1850. 2000. | |
Takemaru KI and Moon RT: The transcriptional coactivator CBP interacts with β-catenin to activate gene expression. J Cell Biol. 149:249–254. 2000. | |
Kramps T, Peter O, Brunner E, et al: Wnt/wingless signaling requires BCL9/legless-mediated recruitment of Pygopus to the nuclear β-catenin-TCF complex. Cell. 109:47–60. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Graham TA, Ferkey DM, Mao F, Kimelman D and Xu W: Tcf4 can specifically recognize β-catenin using alternative conformations. Nat Struct Biol. 8:1048–1052. 2001. | |
Hoverter NP and Waterman ML: A Wnt-fall for gene regulation: repression. Sci Signal. 1:pe432008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
El-Tanani MK, Barraclough R, Wilkinson MC and Rudland PS: Regulatory region of metastasis-inducing DNA is the binding site for T cell factor-4. Oncogene. 20:1793–1797. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
El-Tanani M, Barraclough R, Wilkinson MC and Rudland PS: Metastasis-inducing DNA regulates the expression of the osteopontin gene by binding the transcription factor Tcf-4. Cancer Res. 61:5619–5629. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lewis BP, Burge CB and Bartel DP: Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 120:15–20. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wong TS, Liu XB, Wong BY, Ng RW, Yuen AP and Wei WI: Mature miR-184 as potential oncogenic microRNA of squamous cell carcinoma of tongue. Clin Cancer Res. 14:2588–2592. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mascaux C, Laes JF, Anthoine G, et al: Evolution of microRNA expression during human bronchial squamous carcinogenesis. Eur Respir J. 33:352–359. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arndt GM, Dossey L, Cullen LM, et al: Characterization of global microRNA expression reveals oncogenic potential of miR-145 in metastatic colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 9:3742009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kozaki K, Imoto I, Mogi S, Omura K and Inazawa J: Exploration of tumor-suppressive microRNAs silenced by DNA hypermethylation in oral cancer. Cancer Res. 68:2094–2105. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee EJ, Gusev Y, Jiang J, et al: Expression profiling identifies microRNA signature in pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer. 120:1046–1054. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takahashi-Yanaga F and Kahn M: Targeting Wnt signaling: can we safely eradicate cancer stem cells? Clin Cancer Res. 16:3153–3162. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |