Plasma miR-122 and miR-192 as potential novel biomarkers for the early detection of distant metastasis of gastric cancer
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 28, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3004
- Pages: 1863-1870
Abstract
Introduction
Although in recent years a downward trend in the global incidence of gastric cancer (GC) has been noted, GC still ranks worldwide as the fourth most common cancer and is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality (1–3). In China, the annual prevalence and death rates for GC are more than twice the world average, with mortality from GC accounting for almost a quarter (23.2%) of cancer-related deaths (4).
Almost one-third of GC cases present with metastasis at the time of diagnosis, and 4–14% have metastatic disease to the liver (3,5,6). Gastric cancer with distant metastasis (GC/DM) has a poor prognosis, with a median survival of only 3–5 months (7–9). Systemic chemotherapy is the preferred treatment for metastatic disease and may extend overall survival to 8–12 months (10,11). The efficacy of surgery is controversial, and only some rigorously selected cases may benefit from surgery. Palliative surgery in these patients is not recommended according to treatment guidelines (12,13). Therefore, effective diagnostic markers are needed to allow the early diagnosis of GC/DM. At present, detection of distant metastases mainly depends on computed tomography (CT) investigations, but it can be difficult to identify tiny or occult lesions. Thus, this technique is of limited diagnostic value. Consequently, assessment of a large number of recently identified blood tumor markers, such as circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) has become a central focus of research.
miRNAs are a class of non-coding small RNAs, usually 19–25 nucleotides long, which are transcribed from a stem-loop structure precursor (14). miRNAs mainly regulate target gene mRNAs by degradation or inhibition of translation through complete or incomplete matching of 3′UTR of the target gene, and, thus, participate in signaling pathways affecting tumor occurrence and development, playing similar roles to those of oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes, in either promoting or inhibiting tumor development (15,16). Differentially expressed miRNAs have been found in many types of tumors (17,18), and different types of cancers exhibit distinct miRNA profiles (15,19). Moreover, many studies have shown that miRNAs are stable in blood samples, thus, making the quantitative detection of miRNAs in blood feasible. Therefore, miRNAs in blood have been extensively studied as biomarkers for GC diagnosis, prognosis and treatment (20–23), yet, specific circulating miRNAs associated with distant metastasis in GC remain unidentified.
The aim of the present study was to identify specific miRNAs in GC/DM plasma samples. Using miRNA microarray screening and subsequent qRT-PCR validation, we identified 14 miRNAs in the plasma of patients with GC/DM. Of these miRNAs, we focused on two, miR-122 and miR-192, and found that compared with gastric cancer with no distant metastasis (GC/NDM), miR-122 expression was significantly lower, whereas miR-192 expression was significantly higher in GC/DM. In addition, the potential use of these miRNAs as markers for GC/DM was assessed in one gastric mucosal cell line, three human GC cell lines, and two gastric circulating tumor cell lines. Finally, survival analysis was performed to clarify whether the specific miRNA expression level was associated with patient survival time.
Materials and methods
Patient samples
The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, and all participants provided informed consent.
In total, 96 patients with GC, 7 patients with BGC, 10 patients with CG and 36 control subjects were enrolled in the study. The patients with GC consisted of 48 cases with GC/DM and 48 cases with GC/NDM. Plasma samples were obtained from the patients at the Department of Abdominal Cancer, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, during the period March 2012 to April 2013. The 48 GC/DM cases included GCs with liver, lung, or bone metastasis, or simultaneous multiple-organ metastasis, supported by imaging and pathological evidence. The 48 GC cases without DM were at a local-advanced stage, accompanied by a giant lump or distant lymph node (such as supraclavicular lymph node) metastasis, but had no pathological evidence of DM. Patients in the disease control set had no pathological evidence of tumor disease and were matched to patients by age and gender.
The control plasma samples were obtained from individual undergoing a routine physical examination, who showed no evidence of disease. Controls (HCs) were matched to patients by age and gender.
Study design
The study used a six-step procedure. In step 1, 12 pairs of GC/DM and GC/NDM samples (the discovery set) were set up for miRNA microarray screening. The miRNA profiles were then generated, and 14 miRNAs that were found to be differentially expressed were selected for validation.
In step 2, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to investigate for the presence of the 14 selected miRNAs in the validation set, which consisted of 72 plasma samples from GC (36 pairs of GC/DM and GC/NDM samples) and 36 plasma samples from HCs. This step identified 2 miRNAs (miR-122 and miR-192) that were differentially expressed.
In step 3, to ascertain whether the two identified miRNAs (miR-122 and miR-192) are specific to GC/DM, qRT-PCR validation was further conducted on a cohort containing disease controls, consisting of 10 patients with CG, 7 patients with benign BGC, as well as 10 GC/DMs and 10 HC samples.
In step 4, the levels of the selected miRNAs (miR-122 and miR-192) were also examined using paired pre- and post-distant metastasis plasma samples from 7 patients.
In step 5, final validation was conducted using gastric cell lines: a normal gastric mucosal cell line (GES-1), GC cell lines (SGC7901, MKN45 and BGC823), and cell lines established from circulating tumor cells (CTC141 and CTC105).
In step 6, we evaluated the diagnostic value of these markers for predicting DM. Using Youden’s index as the criterion for determining the optimal cut-off value, the area under the curve (AUC) of each receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated, and survival analysis was also conducted for these two miRNAs.
Gastric cancer cell lines
The human gastric mucosal cell line GES-1, and the human GC cell lines SGC7901, MKN45 and BGC823 were maintained in our laboratory. The circulating tumor cell lines CTC141 and CTC105 were a kind gift from the Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology of Sichuan University. These two cell lines are CD44-positive cells with great potential for tumor metastasis, and were derived from blood samples of two patients with gastric adenocarcinoma by magnetic isolation, purification and stable passaging (24).
All six cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in 5% CO2 at 37°C.
Plasma preparation and RNA isolation
All plasma samples were collected prior to any therapeutic procedure such as surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Venous blood (3–5 ml) was collected into tubes containing EDTA, and the separation procedure was carried out within 2 h after venipuncture. The samples were centrifuged at 1900 × g for 10 min at 4°C, followed by a high-speed centrifugation step of 13,000 × g for a further 10 min at 4°C to complete the removal of residual cell debris and genomic DNA. The supernatant plasma was then removed, split into aliquots and frozen at −80°C until use.
Total RNA was extracted from plasma using TRIzol LS reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and from cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). After adding 750 μl TRIzol LS to 250 μl plasma, 1 pmol ath-miR-159a (synthesized by Riobio, Guangzhou, China) was added as spike-in control and the solution was mixed thoroughly. Total RNA was extracted by TRIzol LS, following the manufacturer’s protocol with minor modifications. The RNA pellet was resuspended in 25 μl nuclease-free water and stored at −80°C.
miRNA profiling
Using 1 pooled plasma sample from 12 GC/DM samples and 1 pooled plasma sample from 12 GC/NDM samples, miRNA profiling was performed with miRCURY LNA™ Universal RT microRNA PCR assays (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark). The assays used the Serum-Plasma Focus microRNA PCR Panels (Exiqon) comprising a 168 miRNA primer set for disease-associated miRNAs commonly found in human serum/plasma, along with LNA™ enhanced primers tagged with SYBR-Green. The method used 384-well PCR plates, and the pre-aliquoted LNA™ PCR primers were added to each well. Total RNA was prepared as described above, and an amount of 22 ng of RNA was used for profiling in each reaction. cDNA was pre-amplified by primers SP6, after identifying Ct reunification values, then doing follow-up experiments. In total, 168 target miRNAs were detected, and the fold-change in the expression of each miRNA was calculated.
qRT-PCR validation of miRNAs in plasma
The miRNA profiling identified 14 differentially expressed miRNAs, which were selected and further quantified by qRT-PCR. Specific primers were purchased from Tiangen Biotechnology (Beijing, China). An aliquot (3 μl) of total RNA was obtained from the 25 μl solution of the resuspended total RNA and was polyadenylated and reverse-transcribed to cDNA using a commercial kit (One Step PrimeScript miRNA cDNA Synthesis kit; Takara, Tokyo, Japan). Subsequently, the cDNA was diluted 7.5-fold, and 2 μl of this diluted cDNA was used as a template. Finally, qRT-PCR was run on a PCR system (IQ5; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) with miRNA-specific primers and SYBR-Green Mix (Takara) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cycle threshold (Ct) values of miRNA expression were normalized to ath-miR-159a (U6).
Further validation of miRNAs in cell lines by qRT-PCR
Using the process described above, two miRNAs (miR-122 and miR-192) were selected for further validation in GES-1, a normal gastric mucosal cell line; two cell lines with low differentiation potential, BGC823 and MKN45; SGC7901, a cell line with moderate differentiation; and the blood circulating tumor cell lines CTC141 and CTC105. qRT-PCR was carried out as described above, except that U6 was used as an internal control in the cells (thus no spike-in control was needed) and the cDNA was diluted 40-fold.
Statistical analysis
The expression levels of miRNAs are presented as 2−ΔCt, where the ΔCt sample is defined as Ct(target)−Ct(miR-159), and Ct represents the threshold cycle number, shown as median ± SD. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to analyze the relative expression of miRNAs, and the Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the expression of plasma miRNAs between the different groups. ROC curves and AUC were used to evaluate the feasibility of using specific plasma miRNAs as a diagnostic tool for GC/DM. Probability of survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the significance of differences between groups was analyzed by the log-rank test. The fold-change (compared with paired samples in the HC group) was analyzed using >2 or <2 as the miRNA expression cut-off value. Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis was applied to estimate hazard ratios for survival. The relationship between clinicopathologic features was assessed by ANOVA, Student’s t-test or χ2 test. All tests were two-sided, and a significance level of P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 16.0; SPSS Ltd., Woking, Surrey UK). Graphs and charts were created using the software packages GraphPad Prism (version 5.00 for Windows; GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and MedCalc (version 12.3.0.0; MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium).
Results
Patients and groups
The baseline epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the 113 patients and the 36 HCs enrolled in the present study are shown in Table I.
 | Table IClinicopathological features of the GC cancer with distant metastasis and without distant metastasis and the healthy controls. |
There were no significant differences in the distribution of age or gender in the discovery set, the validation set and the disease control set. The pathological differentiation, TNM stage, and tumor location did not differ between the GC/DM and GC/NDM groups, and the distribution of metastatic location in the GC/DM group also did not differ between the discovery set and the validation set.
miRNA profiling analysis
RNA quantification and quality assurance of total RNA extracted from the two pooled samples (equal amount from 12 pairs of GC/DM and GC/NDM) showed that the concentration was 11.94 and 11.31 ng/μl, respectively. The miRNA profiling identified 14 significantly altered miRNAs (miR-122, miR-125a-5p, miR-126, miR-133b, miR-148b, miR-151-3p, miR-15b, miR-192, miR-195, miR-200c, miR-205, miR-320a, miR-346 and miR-136) (Table II).
Validation of the plasma-specific miRNAs for the three groups in the validation set
These 14 miRNAs were then assessed to identify those with a mean Cq value of <35, fold-change >2 and P<0.05. Using this method, we found 2 of the 14 miRNAs (namely, miR-122 and miR-192) to have significant expression in the plasma samples, and these were selected for further analysis.
Expression of miR-122 was significantly lower, and expression of miR-192 was significantly higher (both P<0.01) in the GC/DM when compared to levels in the GC/NDM and HC groups, and there were no significant differences in the levels of miR-122 or miR-192 between the GC/NDM and HC groups (P>0.05) (Fig. 1A and B). Using the AUC of the ROC curve to estimate the diagnostic value of miR-122 or miR-192 in discerning distant metastasis in GCs, we found that the plasma levels of miR-122 and miR-192 effectively distinguished patients with GC/DM from patients with GC/NDM and from the HCs (Fig. 1C–F).
Detection of candidate miRNAs in the disease control set
To ascertain whether the upregulated expression of miR-122 and miR-192 was specific to GC/DM, we evaluated the miR-122 and miR-192 expression in plasma from the controls with two additional diseases: 7 patients with BGU, 10 with CG. miR-122 and miR-192 expression in these diseases was compared with that of GC/DM and the controls. Results showed that miR-122 was lower and miR-192 was higher in patients with DM (P<0.01) than in the patients with the other two diseases (Fig. 2A and B), confirming that lower miR-122 and higher miR-192 levels are typical of GC/DM.
Validation of the candidate miRNAs in self-paired plasma samples in pre- and post-distant metastasis plasma samples
By comparison of the samples of patients before distant metastases, we found that miR-122 was significantly decreased while miR-192 was dramatically elevated in patients after distant metastases (P<0.01; Fig. 2C and D).
Further validation using gastric cell lines
Compared with the GES-1 cells, CTC105 and CTC141 cells showed miR-122 levels that were 1.9- and 2.1-fold lower, respectively, and miR-192 levels that were 8.5- and 11.0-fold higher. The expression of both miRNAs in the other three cell lines varied (Fig. 3A and B).
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis
Finally, we determined whether the expression levels of miR-122 and miR-192 are correlated with the survival of patients with GC. Using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods, we found that high expression of plasma miR-122 was correlated with prolonged overall survival (OS) of patients with GC. Univariate Cox analysis revealed that TNM stage (IV) and differentiation (poor) were significantly associated with reduced patient survival, while the plasma miRNA level (high miR-122) contributed to better prognosis of patients with GC. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that upregulation of plasma miR-122 independently contributed to a more favorable prognosis of patients with GC (hazard ratio, 0.262; 95% CI, 0.164–0.816; P=0.038), while the level of miR-192 was not associated with OS in patients with GC (Table III and Fig. 4A and B).
| Table IIIUnivariate and multivariate analyses of plasma miR-122 and clinicopathological factors associated with survival in gastric cancer. |
Discussion
In the present study, we used a case-control experiment to investigate the role of plasma miRNAs in predicting GC/DM using miRNA profiling on two pooled samples, followed by qRT-PCR assays on an independent validation set and then later uisng gastric cancer cell lines. Plasma obtained from 12 cases of each of the two patient groups in the discovery set were mixed together to form two pooled plasma samples that were used for subsequent experiments. This method of pooling samples is a widely used technique that has been shown to be reliable for profiling (25–28).
Tumor metastasis involves a number of critical steps, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), apoptosis and angiogenesis. Multiple miRNAs have been shown to promote or inhibit metastasis (29). Previous studies have shown that miR-200c is closely associated with cancer metastasis and acts as a metastamiR in the EMT process (30). By contrast, miR-31 inhibits multiple steps of metastasis, including invasion, anoikis and colonization, and was shown to cause a 95% reduction in lung metastasis in a model of breast cancer (31). In the present study, using miRNA profiling screening, we identified a total of 14 differentially expressed miRNAs (see Material and methods). These miRNAs were then selected and validated, and two miRNAs, miR-122 and miR-192, were selected for further investigation. The plasma levels of these miRNAs, but not of the other tested miRNAs, were significantly different between the GC/DM and GC/NDM patients in this population.
miR-122 was initially discovered as a liver-specific miRNA, and its precursors are found on human chromosome 18, at position 18q21 (32,33). miR-122 is physiologically involved in liver cell metabolism, cell differentiation and other emergency responses, while in pathological states, it promotes hepatitis C virus replication in liver cells, and participates in carcinogenesis, development and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (34). A recent study found that higher expression of circulating miR-122 predicts metastasis in early-stage breast cancer (35). Iino et al (36) found that miR-122 was significantly upregulated in synchronous colorectal liver metastasis, and also negatively regulated its target gene, cationic amino acid transporter 1. In contrast, in the present study, we found significantly reduced levels of plasma miR-122 in patients with GC/DM relative to patients with GC/NDM and to the HCs, in accordance with another previous study that showed that miR-122 is downregulated in cancer (37,38).
Previous studies found that miR-192 is significantly increased in many types of cancer (39–41), but decreased in many others (42,43). Studies have also shown that p53-mediated upregulation of miR-192 prevents EMT in hepatocellular carcinoma through repression of the transcription factor ZEB2 (44). In the present study, we found that miR-192a was present at significantly higher levels in patients with GC/DM, compared with patients with GC/NDM, the HCs as well as the patients with gastric benign lesions, which is consistent with previous results. This suggests that miR-192 is involved in DM from GC, and might be a suitable marker for discriminating GC/DM from GC/NDM.
We also tested miR-122 and miR-192 in the GC cell lines CTC105 and CTC141, and found that, compared with levels in the GES-1 cells, miR-122 levels were moderately lower while miR-192 levels were dramatically higher. Since CTC105 and CTC141 cells were established from circulating tumor cells possessing metastatic potential, the expression of miR-122 was lower in these two original metastatic cell lines than in the GES-1 cell line, while miR-192 showed the opposite trend. Compared with levels in the GES-1 cells, miR-122 was moderately increased in the SGC7901 cells but slightly decreased in the MKN45 cells and was almost absent in the BGC823 cells. By contrast, miR-192 levels in the SGC7901 and MKN45 cells were considerably lower than that in the GES-1 cells, but levels in the BGC823 cells were almost the same as in the GES-1 cells. These findings are in agreement with those of Chiang et al (45), who found that miR-192 was downregulated in BGC-803, BGC-823 and SGC-7901 cells.
Finally, we also compared the diagnostic value of miR-122 and miR-192 between GC/DM, GC/NDM and HCs by analyzing the AUC. We found that these two candidate miRNAs could perfectly distinguish GC/DM from both GC/NDM and the HCs. Furthermore, through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox analysis, we found that high expression of plasma miR-122 was correlated with prolonged OS of patients with GC, and thus, plasma miR-122 upregulation may be an independent predictor of a more favorable prognosis in patients with GC.
Collectively, our data showed that differential plasma levels of miR-122 and miR-192 exist between patients with GC/DM and patients with GC/NDM. Lower levels of miR-122 and higher levels of miR-192 in plasma were associated with the development of DM in patients with GC. miR-122 and miR-192 may be valuable plasma biomarkers for discerning DM in patients with GC. Therefore, further studies concerning the value of detecting plasma miR-122 and miR-192 in the diagnosis of DM in GC in a larger population of patients with GC and the potential molecular mechanisms by which these miRNAs regulate metastasis of GC are warranted.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2011CB935800), and the National Natural Science Foundation (81071640).
References
|
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J and Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 60:277–300. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 127:2893–2917. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yang L: Incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in China. World J Gastroenterol. 12:17–20. 2006. | |
|
Schlansky B and Sonnenberg A: Epidemiology of noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 106:1978–1985. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kamangar F, Dores GM and Anderson WF: Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 24:2137–2150. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Glimelius B, Ekström K, Hoffman K, et al: Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 8:163–168. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Murad AM, Santiago FF, Petroianu A, Rocha PR, Rodrigues MA and Rausch M: Modified therapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer. 72:37–41. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pyrhonen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P and Kouri M: Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 71:587–591. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, et al: Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 24:4991–4997. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Roth AD, Fazio N, Stupp R, et al: Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil; docetaxel and cisplatin; and epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil as systemic treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research. J Clin Oncol. 25:3217–3223. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chang YR, Han DS, Kong SH, et al: The value of palliative gastrectomy in gastric cancer with distant metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 19:1231–1239. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li C, Yan M and Zhu ZG: Nonpalliative surgical resection for gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis. J Invest Surg. 25:100–106. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 116:281–297. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Calin GA and Croce CM: MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 6:857–866. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ambros V: The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 431:350–355. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Garzon R, Calin GA and Croce CM: MicroRNAs in cancer. Annu Rev Med. 60:167–179. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ortholan C, Puissegur MP, Ilie M, Barbry P, Mari B and Hofman P: MicroRNAs and lung cancer: new oncogenes and tumor suppressors, new prognostic factors and potential therapeutic targets. Curr Med Chem. 16:1047–1061. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shen J, Stass SA and Jiang F: MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers in human solid tumors. Cancer Lett. 329:125–136. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Allegra A, Alonci A, Campo S, et al: Circulating microRNAs: new biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer (Review). Int J Oncol. 41:1897–1912. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Blanco-Calvo M, Calvo L, Figueroa A, Haz-Conde M, Antón-Aparicio L and Valladares-Ayerbes M: Circulating microRNAs: molecular microsensors in gastrointestinal cancer. Sensors. 12:9349–9362. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Song MY, Pan KF, Su HJ, et al: Identification of serum microRNAs as novel non-invasive biomarkers for early detection of gastric cancer. PLoS One. 7:e336082012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang M, Gu H, Wang S, et al: Circulating miR-17-5p and miR-20a: molecular markers for gastric cancer. Mol Med Rep. 5:1514–1520. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen T, Yang K, Yu J, et al: Identification and expansion of cancer stem cells in tumor tissues and peripheral blood derived from gastric adenocarcinoma patients. Cell Res. 22:248–258. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu R, Zhang C, Hu Z, et al: A five-microRNA signature identified from genome-wide serum microRNA expression profiling serves as a fingerprint for gastric cancer diagnosis. Eur J Cancer. 47:784–791. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hu Z, Dong J, Wang LE, et al: Serum microRNA profiling and breast cancer risk: the use of miR-484/191 as endogenous controls. Carcinogenesis. 33:828–834. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Takei Y, Takigahira M, Mihara K, Tarumi Y and Yanagihara K: The metastasis-associated microRNA miR-516a-3p is a novel therapeutic target for inhibiting peritoneal dissemination of human scirrhous gastric cancer. Cancer Res. 71:1442–1453. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gui J, Tian Y, Wen X, et al: Serum microRNA characterization identifies miR-885-5p as a potential marker for detecting liver pathologies. Clin Sci. 120:183–193. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hurst DR, Edmonds MD and Welch DR: Metastamir: the field of metastasis-regulatory microRNA is spreading. Cancer Res. 69:7495–7498. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hur K, Toiyama Y, Takahashi M, et al: MicroRNA-200c modulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human colorectal cancer metastasis. Gut. 62:1315–1326. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Valastyan S, Reinhardt F, Benaich N, et al: A pleiotropically acting microRNA, miR-31, inhibits breast cancer metastasis. Cell. 137:1032–1046. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jopling C, Norman K and Sarnow P: Positive and negative modulation of viral and cellular mRNAs by liver-specific microRNA miR-122. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; pp. 369–376. 2006, View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Etiemble J, Möröy T, Jacquemin E, Tiollais P and Buendia M: Fused transcripts of c-myc and a new cellular locus, hcr in a primary liver tumor. Oncogene. 4:51–57. 1989.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Girard M, Jacquemin E, Munnich A, Lyonnet S and Henrion-Caude A: miR-122, a paradigm for the role of microRNAs in the liver. J Hepatol. 48:648–656. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wu X, Somlo G, Yu Y, et al: De novo sequencing of circulating miRNAs identifies novel markers predicting clinical outcome of locally advanced breast cancer. J Transl Med. 10:422012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Iino I, Kikuchi H, Miyazaki S, et al: Effect of miR-122 and its target gene cationic amino acid transporter 1 on colorectal liver metastasis. Cancer Sci. 104:624–630. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tsai WC, Hsu PWC, Lai TC, et al: MicroRNA-122, a tumor suppressor microRNA that regulates intrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 49:1571–1582. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hsu SH, Wang B, Kota J, et al: Essential metabolic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-tumorigenic functions of miR-122 in liver. J Clin Invest. 122:2871–2883. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gu J, Wang Y and Wu X: MicroRNA in the pathogenesis and prognosis of esophageal cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 19:1292–1300. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao C, Zhang J, Zhang S, et al: Diagnostic and biological significance of microRNA-192 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncol Rep. 30:276–284. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Schee K, Lorenz S, Worren MM, et al: Deep sequencing the MicroRNA transcriptome in colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 8:e661652013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chiang Y, Song Y, Wang Z, et al: microRNA-192, -194 and -215 are frequently downregulated in colorectal cancer. Exp Ther Med. 3:560–566. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang G, Chan ES, Kwan BC, et al: Expression of microRNAs in the urine of patients with bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 10:106–113. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim T, Veronese A, Pichiorri F, et al: p53 regulates epithelial–mesenchymal transition through microRNAs targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Exp Med. 208:875–883. 2011. | |
|
Chiang Y, Zhou X, Wang Z, et al: Expression levels of microRNA-192 and -215 in gastric carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 18:585–591. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |
