PinX1 without the G-patch motif suppresses proliferation, induces senescence, but does not inhibit telomerase activity in colorectal cancer SW480 cells

  • Authors:
    • Rui Zhang
    • Jian Zhao
    • Xu Wang
    • Li-Li Wang
    • Jian Xu
    • Chun Song
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 20, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3199
  • Pages: 286-292
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Evidence suggests that Pin2/TRF1-interacting protein X1 (PinX1) inhibits telomerase activity in many types of cancer cells. G-patch is a motif in the PinX1 protein; however, the function of G-patch in colorectal cancer cells has not been definitively elucidated. The present study investigated the antitumor activities of different PinX1 fragments in vitro, and explored the molecular mechanisms responsible for these effects. SW480 cells were transfected with pEGFP-A1-PinX1 1-328 (intact) or pEGFP-A1-PinX1 69-328 (truncated). Flow cytometry was used to observe apoptosis and the cell cycle of SW480 cells transfected with intact PinX1 or truncated PinX1. The apoptosis-related proteins, caspase 3, 8 and 9, were detected by western blotting. Our results indicate that both intact and truncated PinX1 induced apoptosis, G1 arrest, and cellular senescence. However, truncated PinX1 showed no effects on telomerase activity. Why PinX1 without G-patch has similar antitumor activities as intact PinX1 remains unclear. The mechanisms of G-patch require elucidation in subsequent studies. Finally, we detected the protein and mRNA levels of PinX1 and caspase 3, 8 and 9 in colorectal cancer specimens and confirmed that levels of PinX1 and caspase 3, 8 and 9 expression were closely linked to the poor prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Introduction

Telomeres have many functions within cells, such as maintaining genomic stability and protecting the chromosomal ends from degradation (1,2). Inhibition of telomerase activity or shortened telomeres may increase the incidence of cancer in aged cells (3). Pin2/TRF1-interacting protein X1 (PinX1) which consisting of seven axons is located at chromosome 8p23 (4). Its coding protein that contains 328 amino acids has 2 domains, one is G-patch found in RNA-binding proteins or damage repair agents, the second is telomerase inhibitory domain (TID) (4). In previous studies, it has been observed that PinX1 suppresses telomerase activity by its direct interaction with hTERT and hTR (5). Depletion of PinX1 results in lagging chromosome in mitosis and micronuclei in interphase (6). PinX1 is considered as a tumor suppressor in many tumors due to its low expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (7), prostate cancer (8), gastric carcinoma (9) and medulloblastomas (10).

Although much is known regarding the role of PinX1 in regulating telomerase function, less is known concerning the role of PinX1 without G-patch in colorectal cancer cells. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether PinX1 without G-patch suppresses the growth of colorectal cancer cells.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and synchronization

SW480 cells [American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA, USA] were maintained as subconfluent monolayers in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) and 100 U/ml penicillin plus 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were synchronized at G1/S with 5 mM thymidine for 12–16 h and then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times and cultured in thymidine-free medium for 10 h.

Plasmid construction and transfection

The cDNA encoding PinX1 was cloned into a pEGFP-A1 vector (reserved by our laboratory) to generate the pEGFP-A1-PinX1 plasmid. The PCR product for PinX1 69–328 was cut with restriction enzymes and then inserted into the pEGFP-A1. Transfection of plasmids into SW480 cells was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X, then blocked with 2% BSA in PBS. The primary PinX1 antibody (sc-376394, Epitope: 8–29; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) was used at a 1:100 concentration, and the secondary antibody was Alexa Fluor® 594 rat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) antibody at a concentration of 1:500. Cells were examined and photographed using an Olympus CX71 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

MTT assay

Viability of the cells was determined using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (Sigma-Aldrich, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were plated in 96-well plates (1,500 cells/well) and incubated under normal culture conditions. After 48 h, the cells described above were treated with 0.5 mg/ml of MTT for 4 h and lysed with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Absorbance rates were measured at 550–560 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) double staining

Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining assays were performed to detect apoptosis. Following the manufacturer’s instructions (Apoptosis Detection kit; KeyGen, Nanjing, China), cells were washed and resuspended in binding buffer prior to the addition of FITC-labeled Annexin V and PI for 10 min. Suspensions were immediately analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACSCalibur machine (BD Biosciences, Baltimore, MD, USA).

Cell cycle study

Cells were suspended in PBS and then fixed with 70% ethanol at 4°C. After centrifugation, the supernatants were discarded, and cellular DNA was stained in a solution containing 10 μM of propidium iodide (KeyGen). Then the mixture was analyzed by a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson).

SA-β-gal analysis

For SA-β-gal staining, cells were washed twice in PBS, fixed for 3–5 min at room temperature in 3% formaldehyde and washed again with PBS. Then cells were incubated overnight at 37°C without CO2 in a freshly prepared SA-β-gal-staining solution as described (11).

TRAP telomerase activity assay

Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH, 7.5, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM PMSF, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 % CHAPS, 10% glycerol) on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged at high speed for 30 min, the suspension containing telomerase was used for TRAP assay. Telomerase activity was measured with the TRAPeze telomerase detection kit (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (12).

Subjects

A total of 52 patients with colorectal cancer were obtained from the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute (January 2008 to December 2012). All patients underwent standard laboratory tests (cytology and histology). None of the patients underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy before the operation. Informed consent was provided by all patients according to the Helsinki Declaration.

Extraction of total RNA and real-time PCR

RNA was extracted from tissues using TRIzol solution (Invitrogen) according to the protocols recommended by the manufacturer. Total RNA concentration and quantity were assessed by absorbency at 260 nm using a DNA/Protein Analyzer (DU 530; Beckman, Fullerton, CA, USA). Real-time PCR was performed on a Rotor-Gene RG-6000A apparatus (Corbett Research, Cambridge, UK) for 40 cycles of 94°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 10 sec and 72°C for 15 sec. Reactions (20 μl) included 2 μl of cDNA, target-specific primers, and the QuantiTect SYBR-Green PCR kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The temperature range for analysis of the melting curves was 55–99°C over 30 sec. The primer sequences are listed in Table I. Relative quantitation was calculated using the ΔΔCt method.

Table I

The primers used in the real-time PCR analyses.

Table I

The primers used in the real-time PCR analyses.

GeneSequence (5′-3′; forward/reverse)
Pinx1 ATGTCTATGCTGGCTGAA/TCTGTGGCTCCTTGCT
Caspase 3 CTCGGTCTGGTACAGATGTCG/GGTTAACCCGGGTAAGAATG
Caspase 8 TCTGGAGCATCTGCTGTCTG/CCTGCCTGGTGTCTGAAGTT
Caspase 9 ATGGACGAAGCGGATCGG/CCCTGGCCTTATGATGTT
GAPDH TGGTATCGTGGAAGGACTCATGAC/ATGCCAGTGAGCTTCCCGTTCAGC
Western blot analysis

Cells or tissues were lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Cell extract protein amounts were quantified using the BCA protein assay kit. Equivalent amounts of protein (30 μg) were separated using 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). Anti-Pinx1 antibody (Santa Cruz) was used to identify transfection efficiency, and detection of β-actin was used as an internal control. Cell apoptosis-related proteins were also probed using the following antibodies (Santa Cruz): caspase 3, 8 and 9. Binding of each specific antibody was detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated respective secondary antibodies and ECL solutions (both from Amersham Biosciences, UK).

Immunohistochemical studies

Excised tumors were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h then embedded in paraffin. Sections (4-μm) were generated for immunohistochemical staining. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating sections in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min. Antigen retrieval was performed in citrate buffer (10 mM, pH, 6.0) for 30 min at 95°C in a pressure cooker (YQ50-90A; Peskoe®, Guangzhou, China). Antibodies described for western blot analysis were applied, and sections were incubated at 4°C overnight. Sections were washed with PBS and then incubated with a biotinylated secondary antibody at 37°C for 2 h and then exposed to a streptavidin complex (HRP; Beyotime, Beijing). Positive reactions were visualized using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB), followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin (both from Beyotime).

Statistical analysis

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 16.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival plots were generated, and comparisons were made with log-rank statistics. Data are expressed as the means ± SD, and the intergroup difference was compared using the Student’s t-test. A P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.

Results

PinX1-expressing SW480 cell line

We investigated the consequence of exogenous PinX1 expression in SW480 cells. SW480 cells were transfected with pEGFP-A1-PinX1 1–328 or pEGFP-A1-PinX1 69–328, and EGFP+ SW480 cells were measured by immunofluorescence analysis. As shown in Fig. 1, immunofluorescence analysis showed the localization of PinX1 and EGFP in the PinX1-expressing SW480 cells.

Effects of PinX1 or PinX1 69–328 on SW480 cells

Cell viability was monitored using an MTT assay, and the results indicated that the proliferation ratio of SW480 cells was inhibited by both PinX1 and PinX1 69–328 (P<0.05, Fig. 2A). We utilized Annexin V-FITC and PI double staining to detect apoptotic cells. The apoptotic ratio was 3.8- to 4.2-fold higher in the cells expressing intact or truncated PinX1 when compared with the ratio of the untransfected cells (P<0.05, Fig. 2B). When the cell cycle distribution of the transfected and untransfected cells was examined using PI staining, the ratio of cells in the G1 phase was found to be increased in cells expressing intact or truncated PinX1 vs. the untransfected cells (P<0.05, Fig. 2C). Intact or truncated PinX1-transfected SW480 cells showed strong levels of blue SA-β-gal staining when compared with the untransfected cells (P<0.05, Fig. 2D). Levels of caspase 3, 8 and 9 protein were significantly increased in the SW480 cells following PinX1 or PinX1 69–328 treatment (Fig. 2E). We next examined telomerase activity in the intact or truncated PinX1-transfected SW480 cells and found that the intact PinX1-transfected SW480 cells showed reduced telomerase activity, while the truncated PinX1-transfected cells displayed robust telomerase activity. In contrast, there was no significant change in the telomerase activity in the untransfected cells as observed by TRAP assay (Fig. 2F).

PinX1 or caspase expression in human colorectal cancer specimens and the clinicopathological variables

Western blot analysis was performed in order to determine the protein expression levels of PinX1, caspase 3, 8 and 9. PinX1, caspase 3, 8 and 9 protein levels in the cancer tissues were significantly lower than levels in the normal tissues (P<0.05, Fig. 3A). Real-time PCR analysis for PinX1 and caspase 3, 8 and 9 mRNA was performed in 52 colorectal cancer specimens. Results showed that the levels of PinX1 and caspase 3, 8 and 9 mRNA in cancer tissues were significantly lower than the levels in the normal tissues (P<0.05, Fig. 3B). The results of immunohistochemistry showed that caspase 3, 8 and 9 protein was localized in the cytoplasm, while PinX1 protein was localized in the nucleus of the cells (Fig. 3C). The protein levels of PinX1 and caspase 3, 8 and 9 were significantly positively correlated (P<0.05, Fig. 4). We then analyzed the potential relationship between the expression of PinX1 and caspase 3, 8 and 9 and the clinicopathological characteristics of these patients. Unfortunately, we only found that caspase 3 was associated with differentiation, and caspase 9 was associated with venous invasion and tumor size (P<0.05, Table II). Finally, we investigated the level of PinX1 and caspase 3, 8 and 9 with patient survival. Comparison by the Kaplan-Meier method for low vs. high PinX1 or caspase 3, 8 and 9 expression showed a significant difference in the 5-year survival rate of the patients with colorectal cancer (P<0.05, Fig. 5).

Table II

Relationship between Pinx1 or caspase expression and clinicopathological parameters of the patients with colorectal cancer.

Table II

Relationship between Pinx1 or caspase expression and clinicopathological parameters of the patients with colorectal cancer.

Pinx1Caspase 3Caspase 8Caspase 9




Clinicopathological featuresn+PR (%)χ2P-value+PR (%)χ2P-value+PR (%)χ2P-value+PR (%)χ2P-value
Gender0.10.740.00.920.00.950.50.46
 Female2116523.817419.018314.315628.6
 Male3126516.126516.12839.726516.1
Age (years)0.020.870.60.450.70.390.20.68
 <501412214.31317.111321.410428.6
 ≥503830821.130821.13537.931718.4
Differentiation1.80.185.90.010.10.690.130.71
 Well or moderate3329412.13126.13126.125824.2
 Poor1913631.612736.815421.116315.8
Lymphatic invasion0.30.600.30.610.80.360.00.92
 −2219313.617522.72114.517522.7
 +3023723.326413.325516.724620.0
Venous invasion0.20.630.70.390.30.596.60.01
 −2519624.019624.021416.02414.0
 +2723414.824311.12527.4171037.0
Tumor size (cm)1.60.212.40.121.40.2415.90.00
 <41510533.310533.31500.06960.0
 ≥43732513.533410.831616.23525.4
pN category0.320.950.20.971.40.702.40.50
 pN0119218.29218.29218.28327.3
 pN197222.27222.28111.16333.3
 pN21310323.111215.411215.410323.1
 pN31916315.816315.81815.317210.5

[i] PR, positive rate; χ2, Chi-square distribution. Pinx1, Pin2/TRF1-interacting protein X1.

Discussion

As noted in the Introduction, Pin2/TRF1-interacting protein X1 (PINX1) is a co-regulating gene of telomerase and telomere (7), which is located at chromosome 8p23, consisting of seven axons with two transcription pathways encoding 174 aa and 328 aa proteins (4). In the present study, we demonstrated that PinX1 could induce apoptosis, G1 arrest, and cellular senescence in colorectal cancer SW480 cells. In addition, we revealed that intact PinX1 (1–328 aa) inhibited telomerase activity in the SW480 cells. Previous studies also showed that PinX1 is an internal telomerase inhibitor and suppresses tumor growth both in vivo and in vitro (1315). Overexpression of PinX1 in tumor cells could inhibit telomerase activity, shorten telomeres, and suppress tumor growth, while depletion of endogenous PinX1 increased telomerase activity, elongated telomeres, and enhanced tumorigenicity in a fibrosarcoma cell line, HT1080 (4). However, to our knowledge, no studies have shown the functions of the G-patch motif in PinX1. Notably, in the present study, we found that PinX1 without G-patch (69–328 aa) induced apoptosis and G1 arrest but showed no effects on telomerase activity.

In budding yeast, the PinX1 homolog Gnop1 was shown to bind the yeast telomerase catalytic protein Est2p and inhibit telomerase (16). Gnop1 has additional functions in processing ribosomal RNA and other small nucleolar RNAs that are mediated, at least in part, through G-patch (17,18). However, the effect of human PinX1 on telomerase appears to be exclusive of the G-patch region and is mediated instead by the C terminus of the protein (4). Thus, combined with our results, these findings suggested that the interaction with hTR cannot be ascribed to a general RNA binding feature of PinX1 mediated through G-patch. However, why the PinX1 without G-patch has similar antitumor activities as intact PinX1 remains unclear. The mechanisms of G-patch warrant elucidation in further studies.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China (grant no. 2013020158).

References

1 

Blackburn EH: Switching and signaling at the telomere. Cell. 106:661–673. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

de Lange T: Protection of mammalian telomeres. Oncogene. 21:532–540. 2002.

3 

Smogorzewska A and de Lange T: Regulation of telomerase by telomeric proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 73:177–208. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Zhou XZ and Lu KP: The Pin2/TRF1-interacting protein PinX1 is a potent telomerase inhibitor. Cell. 107:347–359. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Banik SS and Counter CM: Characterization of interactions between PinX1 and human telomerase subunits hTERT and hTR. J Biol Chem. 279:51745–51748. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Yuan K, Li N, Jiang K, et al: PinX1 is a novel microtubule-binding protein essential for accurate chromosome segregation. J Biol Chem. 284:23072–23082. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Park WS, Lee JH, Park JY, et al: Genetic analysis of the liver putative tumor suppressor (LPTS) gene in hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer Lett. 178:199–207. 2002.

8 

Hawkins GA, Chang B, Zheng SL, et al: Mutational analysis of PINX1 in hereditary prostate cancer. Prostate. 60:298–302. 2004.

9 

Kondo T, Oue N, Mitani Y, et al: Loss of heterozygosity and histone hypoacetylation of the PINX1 gene are associated with reduced expression in gastric carcinoma. Oncogene. 24:157–164. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Chang Q, Pang JC, Li J, Hu L, Kong X and Ng HK: Molecular analysis of PinX1 in medulloblastomas. Int J Cancer. 109:309–314. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Dimri GP, Lee X, Basile G, et al: A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:9363–9367. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Kim NW, Piatyszek MA, Prowse KR, et al: Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science. 266:2011–2015. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Qian D, Zhang B, He LR, et al: The telomere/telomerase binding factor PinX1 is a new target to improve the radiotherapy effect of oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas. J Pathol. 229:765–774. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Lai XF, Shen CX, Wen Z, et al: PinX1 regulation of telomerase activity and apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 31:122012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Liu JY, Qian D, He LR, et al: PinX1 suppresses bladder urothelial carcinoma cell proliferation via the inhibition of telomerase activity and p16/cyclin D1 pathway. Mol Cancer. 12:1482013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lin J and Blackburn EH: Nucleolar protein PinX1p regulates telomerase by sequestering its protein catalytic subunit in an inactive complex lacking telomerase RNA. Genes Dev. 18:387–396. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Guglielmi B and Werner M: The yeast homolog of human PinX1 is involved in rRNA and small nucleolar RNA maturation, not in telomere elongation inhibition. J Biol Chem. 277:35712–35719. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Aravind L and Koonin EV: G-patch: a new conserved domain in eukaryotic RNA-processing proteins and type D retroviral polyproteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 24:342–344. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-2014
Volume 32 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang R, Zhao J, Wang X, Wang L, Xu J and Song C: PinX1 without the G-patch motif suppresses proliferation, induces senescence, but does not inhibit telomerase activity in colorectal cancer SW480 cells. Oncol Rep 32: 286-292, 2014.
APA
Zhang, R., Zhao, J., Wang, X., Wang, L., Xu, J., & Song, C. (2014). PinX1 without the G-patch motif suppresses proliferation, induces senescence, but does not inhibit telomerase activity in colorectal cancer SW480 cells. Oncology Reports, 32, 286-292. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3199
MLA
Zhang, R., Zhao, J., Wang, X., Wang, L., Xu, J., Song, C."PinX1 without the G-patch motif suppresses proliferation, induces senescence, but does not inhibit telomerase activity in colorectal cancer SW480 cells". Oncology Reports 32.1 (2014): 286-292.
Chicago
Zhang, R., Zhao, J., Wang, X., Wang, L., Xu, J., Song, C."PinX1 without the G-patch motif suppresses proliferation, induces senescence, but does not inhibit telomerase activity in colorectal cancer SW480 cells". Oncology Reports 32, no. 1 (2014): 286-292. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3199