Expression of neighbor of Punc E11 in hepatocarcinogenesis induced by diethylnitrosamine

  • Authors:
    • Young Hee Kim
    • Kyung A Kwak
    • Jin Seok Kang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 23, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3285
  • Pages: 1043-1049
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

To identify preneoplastic markers for hepatocarcino­genesis, the expression levels of neighbor of Punc E11 (Nope), E-cadherin and α-fetoprotein (AFP) were investigated in carcinogen-treated embryonic cell lineages. Mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs), and hepatocyte‑like cells (HCs) representing 0, 22, and 40 days of liver differentiation, respectively, were treated in vitro with diethylnitrosamine (DEN) at 4 doses (0, 1, 5, and 15 mM) for 24 h. The expression of Nope, E-cadherin and AFP was examined by quantitative real-time PCR, western blotting and immunocytochemistry. DEN treatment significantly increased the mRNA expression of Nope in ESCs and HPCs, and that of E-cadherin and AFP in all three cell lines, although the changes in expression were triggered by varying DEN concentrations. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that Nope was expressed at the cell membrane in ESCs and HPCs and within granules or in the cytoplasm of HCs, which was also stained by E-cadherin. DEN treatment induced Nope expression in ESCs, HPCs and HCs and caused a concomitant increase in E-cadherin expression. Although Nope expression clearly increased following tumor induction, its expression pattern changed with the developmental stage. In conclusion, we determined that Nope expression may carry prognostic significance during early hepatocarcinogenesis. Moreover, Nope expression may serve as a novel oncofetal surface marker for preneoplastic stages that are not identifiable by the commonly used marker, AFP.

Introduction

In toxicology and pharmacology, embryonic stem cell (ESC) derived hepatocytes have been suggested as an in vitro alternative model for toxicity and/or carcinogenicity assay testing (1,2). Hepatic differentiation of mouse ESCs was first demonstrated using a stepwise method, adding specific growth factors after the formation of an embryoid body (3). The recent generation of functional hepatocytes from ESCs using chemically defined culture conditions has revealed similarities to in vivo hepatogenesis (4,5). The functionality of differentiated hepatocytes is generally confirmed by the expression of specific marker proteins, such as cytokeratins (CK), GATA binding proteins (GATA), and α-fetoprotein (AFP). Expression of these indicators of hepatic development can also be used as a measure of hepatotoxicity.

ESC-derived hepatocytes and hepatic progenitors may also serve as a model to study the induction of hepatocarcinoma, as hepatic tumors originate from liver stem cells (6). Prior to tumor formation, exposure to carcinogens first causes the formation of preneoplastic lesions as an adaptive non-oncogenic response. Similar to numerous solid tumors, hepatocarcinoma is sustained by a distinct subpopulation of cancer stem cells (7).

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is distinguished from normal liver or dysplastic lesions by the expression of the neighbor of Punc E11 (Nope), a transmembrane protein in the immunoglobulin superfamily. Nope was initially described by Salbaum and Kappen (8) and has high sequence homology with Punc and the axonal guidance receptors, deleted in colorectal cancer and Neogenin (911). High levels of Nope expression are noted at the time of transformation from preneoplastic lesion to malignant HCC (12). Moreover, expression levels progressively increase with the advance of HCC, suggesting a potential role of Nope as a prognostic indicator.

Following our observation that diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced carcinogenicity in animals varies with age, we hypothesized that DEN-induced expression of Nope would vary with the differentiation stage of hepatic cells. In the present study, we investigated how sensitivity to DEN, as measured by the expression of Nope, varies with hepatic differentiation from ESCs to mature hepatocytes.

Materials and methods

Culture of mouse ESCs and differentiation of hepatic lineage cells

Mouse ESCs (NVRQS-11F) were cultured using mitomycin C-treated mouse embryonic fibroblasts as feeder cells on 0.1% gelatin-coated dishes in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Rockville, MD, USA), 2 ml-glutamine (Millipore), 0.1% nonessential amino acids (Invitrogen), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Millipore), and 10 ng/ml mouse leukemia inhibitory factor (Millipore). To differentiate ESCs into hepatic lineage cells (HPCs) in vitro, defined culture media were supplemented with rmHGF (Invitrogen), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and sodium butyrate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Subsequently, mEGF (Invitrogen), oncostatin M, dexamethasone, nicotinamide and ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) were added to differentiate HCs from HPCs.

DEN treatment of ESCs, HPCs and HCs

ESCs (day 0), HPCs (day 22 of differentiation) and HCs (day 40 of differentiation) were treated with four concentrations of DEN (0, 1, 5 and 15 mM) for 24 h.

Nope and E-cadherin mRNA expression

RNA was isolated from cultured cells using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), dissolved in diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated distilled water and stored at −80°C until use. RNA concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically. Nope and GAPDH mRNA expression was determined by relative quantitative real-time PCR in 96-well optical plates using an ABI StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The primers are listed in Table I. The expression levels of the target genes were normalized to mouse GAPDH mRNA and are expressed as the relative expression. Gene expression was normalized according to the cycle number at which the fluorescence signal of the target product was detectable (threshold cycle, Ct) to provide ΔCt. The expression of the genes relative to a reference was calculated as 2−ΔΔCt, where ΔΔCt refers to the difference between the ΔCt values of the test group and the reference.

Table I

Murine oligonucleotide primer sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR.

Table I

Murine oligonucleotide primer sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR.

Gene nameAccession numberPrimer sequenceProduct length (bp)
NopeNM_020043 5′-CCTGGTATATGACGCCATAA-3′
5′-GAGTGGACAATGACCTCAG-3′
90
AFPNM_007423 5′-TTGTGTATAAGGAATGAAGCAAG-3′
5′-CCTGTTGGAATACGAAGAGTT-3′
75
E-cadherinNM_009864 5′-AACTGGCTGGAGATTAACC-3′
5′-CTGTGGCGATGATGAGAG-3′
115
GAPDHNM_008084 5′-GAAACCTGCCAAGTATGATG-3′
5′-GGAGTTGCTGTTGAAGTC-3′
121
Immunofluorescence staining of Nope and E-cadherin

Cells were cultured at a low density on coverslips and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature (RT). The medium was removed by aspiration, and cells were washed twice with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4; Invitrogen), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min, and rinsed twice with 1× PBS. After cell permeabilization in 1× PBS and 0.1% Triton X-100 (PT) for 10 min, proteins were blocked with 4% normal goat serum in PT and incubated with anti-Nope (1:100 dilution; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Hepatic lineage cells were incubated in anti-E-cadherin (1:100 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) for 1 h at RT. Cells were then incubated with Alexa488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa597-conjugated anti-mouse IgG/IgM (Invitrogen) for 1 h at RT and counterstained with Hoechst 33258. After three washes with PBS, cells were mounted in Fluorescence Mounting Medium (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Immunofluorescence was detected under a confocal microscope (LSM-700; Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). All data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and are expressed as the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate or quadruplicate. P-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant results.

Results

Nope, E-cadherin and AFP mRNA expression

ESCs treated with 5 or 15 mM DEN expressed 1.5- or 4.5-fold greater levels of Nope, respectively, when compared with normal ESCs (P<0.001). Expression level of E-cadherin increased significantly by 3- and 1.3-fold in the ESCs treated with 5 or 15 mM DEN (P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively). AFP mRNA expression increased significantly 1.5-fold in the ESCs treated with 1 mM DEN (P<0.001), as compared to the control ESCs (Fig. 1).

HPCs treated with 15 mM DEN expressed 4.5-fold higher levels of Nope expression compared with the normal ESCs (P<0.001). Expression of E-cadherin significantly increased 1.5-fold in the ESCs treated with DEN 15 mM (P<0.001). AFP mRNA expression increased significantly 1.5- and 2-fold in the HPCs treated with 1 and 5 mM DEN (P<0.001), respectively, relative to the control HPCs (Fig. 2).

HCs treated with 5 or 15 mM DEN expressed 1.2- or 1.5-fold higher levels of Nope relative to the untreated HCs (P<0.01, P<0.001, respectively). Expression of E-cadherin increased by 3- and 1.3-fold in the HCs treated with 5 and 15 mM DEN, respectively (P<0.001). AFP mRNA expression increased significantly by 2.2-fold in the HCs treated with 1 mM DEN (P<0.001) as compared to the control HCs (Fig. 3).

Expression of Nope and E-cadherin increased in a dose-dependent manner with the concentration of DEN in the cultured hepatic lineage cells. However, AFP mRNA expression increased only at lower concentrations of DEN (1 or 5 mM).

Immunofluorescence staining of Nope and E-cadherin

Immunofluorescence staining for Nope revealed membranous expression in hepatic lineage cells derived from mouse ESCs, as well as the co-expression of E-cadherin. Merged images indicate that all cells were positive for both markers.

The cellular distribution of Nope was also compared to that of E-cadherin induced by exposure to DEN. Nope was specifically detected at the cell surface in cells treated with high doses of DEN in the ESCs and HPCs.

DEN treatment increased Nope and E-cadherin expression in ESCs, HPCs and HCs (Figs. 46). Furthermore, in ESCs treated with DEN, Nope expression not only increased but followed the same cell membrane pattern as E-cadherin (Fig. 4). During differentiation into HPCs and HCs, Nope and E-cadherin expression decreased, while DEN treatment reversed this trend (Figs. 5 and 6).

Discussion

Given that no effective treatment exists for HCC, and upon diagnosis, most patients with advanced disease have a remaining life-span of 4–6 months, the early detection of HCC is crucial (13). Serum AFP concentrations are often elevated in patients with HCCs, but can only be detected at advanced stages (14).

AFP, first described by Abelev et al in 1960, is the most intensively investigated tumor marker for HCC. AFP is an oncofetal glycoprotein with a molecular weight of 70 kDa and unknown function (15). It is physiologically expressed in fetal liver and pathologically increased in the serum of many patients with HCC, but its sensitivity and specificity are limited (60–70 and 80–90%, respectively) (16,17). For many years, AFP was the only marker available to identify HCC development in patients at high risk. The combination with ultrasound improves the detection rate of AFP, but a high percentage of patients with HCC do not present with elevated AFP levels and vice versa. Although recent clinical trials indicate that AFP is more sensitive in detecting HCC than other newly identified markers, current guidelines no longer recommend AFP for surveillance due to its unreliability (11).

Marquardt et al reported the potential of Nope as an oncofetal surface marker for murine and human HCC, and provided evidence for its specific expression in hepatoma cell lines and primary HCC. Nope expression was selectively detected in HCC specimens but not in normal liver or dysplastic lesions, and increases in Nope expression coincided with the transformation of preneoplastic lesions to malignant HCC. Nope was found to be expressed at higher levels than AFP, and was 100% sensitive and specific for HCC in the selected mouse model (12).

In the present study, expression of Nope was independent of AFP expression in the DEN-treated hepatic lineage cells from mouse ESCs. Although Nope expression increased with greater concentrations of the carcinogen, AFP expression remained low following treatment with lower concentrations of the carcinogen. Nope was expressed at higher levels than AFP in the hepatic lineage cells derived from mouse ESCs. Several studies have not been able to detect increased AFP in dysplastic lesions and early HCC; AFP expression appears to be specifically expressed by advanced HCC (1820). Thus, promising markers for the specific detection of preneoplastic and early HCC are needed. Nope seems to be a promising marker for specific, early detection of HCC that could complement other markers.

Although initial studies to identify and enrich for hepatoblasts or endodermal cells in the fetal liver relied on combinations of known stem cell surface markers expressed by many different cell types within the liver (21,22), more recent studies have shown that Liv2 (23), δ-like 1 homolog (Dlk1) (Drosophila) (24), and E-cadherin (25,26) are specific cell surface markers of fetal liver stem/progenitor cells (FLSPCs) within the developing liver.

In the present study, we detected high expression levels of Nope in DEN-treated hepatic lineage cells. DEN, a well-known hepatocarcinogen, is widely used in mouse liver cancer models (2732). Expression of E-cadherin and AFP was also highly elevated in DEN-treated cells as compared to untreated cells. When the concentration of DEN was varied (1, 5 and 15 mM), the mRNA expression of Nope and E-cadherin increased in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, mRNA expression of AFP did not change at the highest concentration of DEN. Nope expression patterns changed as cells differentiated into more defined hepatic cell types. Furthermore, Nope-positive cells also expressed E-cadherin, and merged images revealed that Nope was expressed only in E-cadherin-positive cells, indicating that all Nope-positive cells were of epithelial origin.

Clinically established screening methods for HCC such as ultrasound and elevated serum levels of AFP have slightly improved the accuracy of prognosis, but their sensitivity and specificity are still limited, particularly at the early stages of tumor development (7,33,34). Moreover, clinically established tumor markers fail to detect up to one-third of HCC cases. In addition to high sensitivity and reliable detection of early stages in carcinogenesis, the expression of ideal tumor markers should be limited in normal tissue and correlate with disease stage. Apart from AFP, other biomarkers, including AFP-L3, Golgi protein 73, and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), have been identified, and some show promising results for both screening and the evaluation of prognosis (3538). However, none fulfills all the aforementioned criteria, although combinations of several markers might increase diagnostic power and prognostic reliability. Therefore, the identification of additional, more reliable tumor markers is particularly relevant (16,17).

The expression of other biomarkers in HCC samples has been shown to generally be lower than that of Nope, and does not reach statistical significance in comparison to AFP. Notably, a previous study suggested that the expression levels of AFP and GPC-3 are regulated by similar mechanisms (39).

DEN-treated cells were stained positive for Nope, and Nope was specifically detected at the cell membrane during the early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis by confocal microscopy. Nope-positive cells co-expressed epithelial-specific E-cadherin. Nope was significantly overexpressed in DEN-treated hepatic lineage cells compared to untreated cells.

In conclusion, we identified that Nope may have prognostic significance during early hepatocarcinogenesis. These results indicate that Nope is a sensitive and specific marker for the early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis, and may have a superior detection rate compared to AFP. Nope is a novel oncofetal surface marker for preneoplastic stages in which the commonly used marker AFP is not yet overexpressed. This study contributes to cancer research by examining Nope expression during the early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis. Further investigations will concentrate on the functional and prognostic significance of Nope following treatment with other carcinogens.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Hwan-Goo Kang (Toxicology and Residue Chemistry Division, Animal, Plant and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection Agency, MIFAFF) for his help and comments. This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012-0002704).

References

1 

Greenhough S, Medine CN and Hay DC: Pluripotent stem cell derived hepatocyte like cells and their potential in toxicity screening. Toxicology. 278:250–255. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Okura H, Komoda H, Saga A, et al: Properties of hepatocyte-like cell clusters from human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Engineering Part C Methods. 16:761–770. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Hamazaki T, Iiboshi Y, Oka M, et al: Hepatic maturation in differentiating embryonic stem cells in vitro. FEBS Lett. 497:15–19. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Touboul T, Hannan NR, Corbineau S, et al: Generation of functional hepatocytes from human embryonic stem cells under chemically defined conditions that recapitulate liver development. Hepatology. 51:1754–1765. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Rambhatla L, Chiu C-P, Kundu P, Peng Y and Carpenter MK: Generation of hepatocyte-like cells from human embryonic stem cells. Cell Transplant. 12:1–11. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Abelev GI, Perova SD, Khramkova NI, Postnikova ZA and Irlin IS: Production of embryonal alpha-globulin by transplantable mouse hepatomas. Transplantation. 1:174–180. 1963. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Bruix J and Sherman M: Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 42:1208–1236. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Visvader JE and Lindeman GJ: Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat Rev Cancer. 8:755–768. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Schievenbusch S, Schrammel T, Goeser T and Nierhoff D: Neighbor of Punc E11 in the Mdr2-/- mouse model: Novel marker of stem/progenitor cells in regenerating adult liver. Hepatology. Wiley-Blackwell; MA: pp. 962A. 2011

10 

Schievenbusch S, Sauer E, Curth HM, et al: Neighbor of Punc E 11: expression pattern of the new hepatic stem/progenitor cell marker during murine liver development. Stem Cells. 21:2656–2666. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Salbaum JM and Kappen C: Cloning and expression of nope, a new mouse gene of the immunoglobulin superfamily related to guidance receptors. Genomics. 64:15–23. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Marquardt JU, Quasdorff M, Varnholt H, et al: Neighbor of Punc E11, a novel oncofetal marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 128:2353–2363. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

He G, Dhar D, Nakagawa H, et al: Identification of liver cancer progenitors whose malignant progression depends on autocrine IL-6 signaling. Cell. 155:384–396. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Sato Y, Nakata K, Kato Y, et al: Early recognition of hepatocellular carcinoma based on altered profiles of alpha-fetoprotein. N Engl J Med. 328:1802–1806. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Sell S and Dunsford H: Evidence for the stem cell origin of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Pathol. 134:13471989.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Gebo KA, Chander G, Jenckes MW, et al: Screening tests for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review. Hepatology. 36:S84–S92. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Gupta S, Bent S and Kohlwes J: Test characteristics of α-fetoprotein for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C: A systematic review and critical analysis. Ann Intern Med. 139:46–50. 2003.

18 

Marrero JA and Feng Z: Alpha-fetoprotein in early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 138:400–401. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Forner A, Reig M and Bruix J: α-fetoprotein for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis: the demise of a brilliant star. Gastroenterology. 137:26–29. 2009.

20 

Marrero JA, Feng Z, Wang Y, et al: Alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma carboxyprothrombin, and lectin-bound alpha-fetoprotein in early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 137:110–118. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Kubota H and Reid LM: Clonogenic hepatoblasts, common precursors for hepatocytic and biliary lineages, are lacking classical major histocompatibility complex class I antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:12132–12137. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Suzuki A, Zheng YW, Kondo R, et al: Flow-cytometric separation and enrichment of hepatic progenitor cells in the developing mouse liver. Hepatology. 32:1230–1239. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Watanabe T, Nakagawa K, Ohata S, et al: SEK1/MKK4-mediated SAPK/JNK signaling participates in embryonic hepatoblast proliferation via a pathway different from NF-kappaB-induced anti-apoptosis. Dev Biol. 250:332–347. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Tanimizu N, Nishikawa M, Saito H, Tsujimura T and Miyajima A: Isolation of hepatoblasts based on the expression of Dlk/Pref-1. J Cell Sci. 116:1775–1786. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Nierhoff D, Ogawa A, Oertel M, Chen YQ and Shafritz DA: Purification and characterization of mouse fetal liver epithelial cells with high in vivo repopulation capacity. Hepatology. 42:130–139. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Nitou M, Sugiyama Y, Ishikawa K and Shiojiri N: Purification of fetal mouse hepatoblasts by magnetic beads coated with monoclonal anti-e-cadherin antibodies and their in vitro culture. Exp Cell Res. 279:330–343. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Rabes H: Development and growth of early preneoplastic lesions induced in the liver by chemical carcinogens. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 106:85–92. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Kang JS, Kang HG, Park YI, et al: Expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule and proliferating cell nuclear antigen in diethylnitrosamine induced hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. Exp Ther Med. 5:138–142. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kang JS: Expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule in early phase of hepatocarcinogenesis of mice treated with diethylnitrosamine. J Biomed Res. 13:243–247. 2012.

30 

Fausto N and Campbell JS: Mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma. Seminars in Liver Disease. Thieme Medical Publishers; pp. 087–098. 2010, View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Kang JS, Wanibuchi H, Morimura K, Gonzalez FJ and Fukushima S: Role of CYP2E1 in diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in vivo. Cancer Res. 67:11141–11146. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Bannasch P: Sequential cellular changes during chemical carcinogenesis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 108:11–22. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Zhang BH, Yang BH and Tang ZY: Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 130:417–422. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Song BC, Chung YH, Kim JA, et al: Transforming growth factor-β1 as a useful serologic marker of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 94:175–180. 2002.

35 

Li D, Mallory T and Satomura S: AFP-L3: a new generation of tumor marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Chim Acta. 313:15–19. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Marrero JA, Su GL, Wei W, et al: Des-gamma carboxyprothrombin can differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma from nonmalignant chronic liver disease in American patients. Hepatology. 37:1114–1121. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Capurro M, Wanless IR, Sherman M, et al: Glypican-3: a novel serum and histochemical marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 125:89–97. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Marrero JA, Romano PR, Nikolaeva O, et al: GP73, a resident Golgi glycoprotein, is a novel serum marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 43:1007–1012. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Morford LA, Davis C, Jin L, Dobierzewska A, Peterson ML and Spear BT: The oncofetal gene glypican 3 is regulated in the postnatal liver by zinc fingers and homeoboxes 2 and in the regenerating liver by alpha-fetoprotein regulator 2. Hepatology. 46:1541–1547. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-2014
Volume 32 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kim YH, Kwak KA and Kang JS: Expression of neighbor of Punc E11 in hepatocarcinogenesis induced by diethylnitrosamine. Oncol Rep 32: 1043-1049, 2014.
APA
Kim, Y.H., Kwak, K.A., & Kang, J.S. (2014). Expression of neighbor of Punc E11 in hepatocarcinogenesis induced by diethylnitrosamine. Oncology Reports, 32, 1043-1049. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3285
MLA
Kim, Y. H., Kwak, K. A., Kang, J. S."Expression of neighbor of Punc E11 in hepatocarcinogenesis induced by diethylnitrosamine". Oncology Reports 32.3 (2014): 1043-1049.
Chicago
Kim, Y. H., Kwak, K. A., Kang, J. S."Expression of neighbor of Punc E11 in hepatocarcinogenesis induced by diethylnitrosamine". Oncology Reports 32, no. 3 (2014): 1043-1049. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3285