miR-23a promotes cisplatin chemoresistance and protects against cisplatin-induced apoptosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells through Twist
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 10, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3664
- Pages: 942-950
Abstract
Introduction
Oral squamous cell carcinoma is the most common head and neck cancer. It accounts for more than 90% of all head and neck cancers and has a poor prognosis (1). Tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) is the most common oral squamous cell carcinoma. It is associated with poorer survival and a lower rate of local tumor control than other sites of head and neck cancer, with a 5-year survival rate of 50% (2). Chemotherapy has been widely accepted as one of the three major therapies (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy) treating advanced squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region (3). Cisplatin, a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent, is effective as a single agent or in combination with other drugs for the treatment of TSCC (4). Treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been found to improve the prognosis of patients with TSCC (5). However, one of the most important clinical issues of cisplatin-based TSCC chemotherapy is the intrinsic/acquired chemoresistance to cisplatin (6).
Traditionally, the targets and modulators of chemotherapy most in focus are DNA, mRNA and proteins (3). Recently, it has been found that microRNAs (miRNAs) are implicated in oncogenic cell processes including chemoresistance (7). miRNAs are small non-coding RNA molecules of 19–25 nucleotides in length. They regulate target gene expression post-transcriptionally by incomplete base pairing with their target mRNAs (8). They function through RNA-induced silencing complexes, targeting them to mRNAs where they either repress translation or direct destructive cleavage (9). A recent study has shown that the increased expression of miR-23a promotes cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells (3).
Wist, also known as Twist1, belongs to the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. High expression of Twist has been detected in several types of cancers and has been associated with cancer progression and chemoresistance (10). A recent study has shown that overexpression of Twist is associated with poor prognosis of TSCC patients (11), which suggests that Twist could be a potential therapeutic target for TSCC.
Our pilot study suggested that miR-23a regulates the expression of Twist in TSCC cells. In the present study, we explored the interaction between miR-23a and Twist in TSCC cells, and assessed its impact on TSCC chemoresistance to cisplatin.
Materials and methods
Cell lines, plasmids and reagents
Human TSCC cell lines SCC-4 and Tca8113 were purchased from the American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA) and the Wuhan Boster Biological Engineering Inc. (Wuhan, China), respectively. Twist (sc-38604-V) shRNA lentiviral particles, control shRNA lentiviral particles-A (sc-108080) and anti-Twist (sc-81417) and anti-β-actin (ACTBD11B7) (sc-81178) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). SuperFect transfection reagent was purchased from Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA). The non-radioactive c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) assay kit (#8794) was purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA, USA). Human Twist cDNA was subcloned into the pcDNA 3.1 expression vector (12). The pMIRH23aPA-1 lentiviral vector expressing miR-23a, the pMIRZIP-23a lentiviral vector expressing shRNA against miR-23a, and the lentiviral packaging system were purchased from System Biosciences (Mountain View, CA, USA). The Annexin V-EGFP apoptosis detection kit was purchased from BioVision (Mountain View, CA, USA). Puromycin, cisplatin, selective JNK inhibitor SP600125 and all chemicals of reagent grade were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Transfection and lentiviral transduction
The Twist expression vector was transfected into cells using SuperFect transfection reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Pools of stable transductants were generated via selection with G418 (600 μg/ml) by the manufacturer’s protocol. Lentiviral transduction of Twist-shRNA was performed in SCC-4 and Tca8113 cells. Pools of stable transductants were generated via selection with puromycin (4 μg/ml) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). SCC-4 and Tca8113 cells were also transduced with the lentivirus expressing miR-23a (pMIRH23aPA-1) sequences, shRNAs against miR-23a (pMIRZIP-23a), or control scrambled hairpin vector sequences under the control of constitutive H1 promoter (Systems Biosciences). Lentiviral supernatants were used to infect the cells with the addition of Polybrene at 8 μg/ml for 8 h. Cells were harvested 48 h after the lentiviral transduction.
Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR
Total RNA was prepared from cells using TRIzol reagent followed by purification with TURBO DNA-free system (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The cDNAs were synthesized using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using SYBR-Green PCR Master Mix in a 7300 Real-Time PCR system (both from Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). TaqMan microRNA assays (Applied Biosystems) that include RT primers and TaqMan probes were used to quantify the expression of miRNA-23a; RNU66 (PN 4373382) was used as an internal control (Applied Biosystems) for determining the expression level of miR-23a. For measurement of the Twist mRNA level, the following primers were used: for Twist, 5′-AC GAGCTGGACTCCAAGATG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CACGCC CTGTTTCTTTGAAT-3′ (reverse); for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 5′-GACTCATGACCACAGT CCATGC-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGAGGCAGGGATGATGTT CTG-3′ (reverse). The results were normalized against that of the GAPDH gene in the same sample. Each experiment was repeated for three times in duplicates.
Western blot analysis
Briefly, cells were dissolved in 250 μl of 2X SDS loading buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 25% glycerol, 0.01% bromphenol blue, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol), and incubated at 95°C for 10 min. Equal amount of proteins for each sample were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride microporous membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were incubated for 1 h with a 1/500 dilution of primary antibody, and then washed and revealed using secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1/5,000; 1 h). Peroxidase was revealed with a GE Healthcare ECL kit (Shanghai, China).
JNK activity assay
The JNK activity was measured with a non-radioactive assay kit as per the manufacturer’s protocol (New England Biolabs) (13). Briefly, JNK was precipitated from the cell lysate by c-Jun fusion protein bound to glutathione sepharose beads. c-Jun contains a high affinity-binding site for JNK, N-terminal to the two phosphorylation sites, Ser63 and Ser73. After selectively pulling down JNK using c-jun fusion protein beads, the beads were extensively washed and the kinase reaction was carried out in the presence of cold ATP in a final volume of 25 μl. The reaction was stopped with 25 μl of 2X SDS sample buffer and loaded onto a 10% polyacrylamide gel. Protein was transferred to nitrocellulose by electroblotting, and c-jun phosphorylation was selectively measured using the phospho-c-Jun antibody.
Cisplatin chemosensitivity/chemoresistance assay
Cells were plated in duplicates in 96-well plates at a density of 5,000 cells. After 24 h of incubation, the medium was replaced by fresh medium with or without various concentrations of cisplatin (Sigma). Then cell viability was assayed 48 h later using a modified MTT assay as previously described (14). The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was defined as the concentration resulting in a 50% reduction in growth compared to control cells.
Apoptosis analysis
Cells were seeded at 5×105/well in 6-well plates. After cells attached to the plates (~2 h after seeding), cells were treated with 20 μM of cisplatin for 30 h. Cell apoptosis was analyzed with an Annexin V-EGFP apoptosis detection kit coupled with flow cytometric analysis according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioVision).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows 10.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). All data values are expressed as means ± SD. Comparisons of means among multiple groups were performed with one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc pairwise comparisons using Tukey’s test. A two-tailed p<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result in the present study.
Results
Overexpression and knockdown of miR-23a and Twist in human TSCC cells
To investigate the functional interaction between miR-23a and Twist in TSCC cells, we overexpressed miR-23a and Twist in SCC-4 and Tca8113 human TSCC cells, and on the other hand transduced the cells with lentiviral shRNAs to knock down miR-23a and Twist, respectively. Real-time reverse transcription PCR showed that compared with the controls, miR-23a was overexpressed by ~3.5-fold and knocked down ~70% in SCC-4 and Tca8113 cells, respectively; the Twist mRNA was overexpressed by ~4-fold and knocked down ~75% in SCC-4 and Tca8113 cells, respectively (Fig. 1). Twist expression at both the mRNA (Fig. 1) and protein levels (Fig. 2) in the TSCC cells increased (by ~3-fold at the mRNA and 2.6-fold at the protein level) and decreased (by ~53% at the mRNA and 50% at the protein level) in parallel with miR-23a overexpression and knockdown, respectively. In contrast, overexpression and knockdown of Twist had no significant effect on the expression of miR-23a (Fig. 1). Our pilot study suggested that miR-23a would regulate Twist expression in TSCC cells by a JNK-dependent mechanism (data not shown). Therefore, we included a selective JNK inhibitor SP600125 (10 μM) in all experiments in the present study (15). As shown in Fig. 1, the JNK inhibitor had no significant effect on the constitutive expression level of miR-23a. However, it abolished miR-23a-induced Twist expression in the TSCC cells (Figs. 1 and 2).
Effects of overexpression and knockdown of miR-23a and Twist on JNK activity in TSCC cells
The above results suggested that miR-23a regulates Twist expression in TSCC cells in a JNK-dependent manner. Therefore, we next examined the individual effect of and interaction between miR-23a and Twist on JNK activity, which was measured by phosphorylation of c-Jun, a substrate of JNK (13). As evidenced by the increased level of phosphorylated c-Jun, overexpression of miR-23a respectively induced JNK activity by 2.4- and 2.1-fold in the SCC-4 and Tca8113 cells, which was abolished by SP600125 (10 μM) yet not knockdown of Twist (Fig. 3). On the other hand, knockdown of miR-23a decreased JNK activity by ~70% in both SCC-4 and Tca8113 cells, which was not significantly affected by overexpression of Twist (Fig. 3). Compared with the controls, overexpression and knockdown of Twist showed no significant effect on JNK activity (Fig. 3).
Effects of overexpression and knockdown of miR-23a and Twist on TSCC cell chemoresistance to cisplatin
To explore the individual effect of and interaction between miR-23a and Twist on TSCC chemoresistance, we examined cisplatin IC50 in TSCC cells. A higher IC50 value was considered to correspond to clinical chemoresistance to cisplatin (16). As shown in Fig. 4, following 48 h of cisplatin treatment, the cisplatin IC50 values for SCC-4 and Tca8113 cells were 6.2 and 7.1 μM, respectively. Overexpression of miR-23a significantly increased the IC50 to 17.5 and 16.0 μM, respectively, which was abolished by knockdown of Twist or SP600125 (10 μM) (Fig. 4). In contrast, knockdown of miR-23a respectively decreased the IC50 to 3.3 and 4.0 μM, which was completely reversed by overexpression of Twist (Fig. 4). Overexpression of Twist respectively increased the cisplatin IC50 to 22.1 and 20.6 μM in SCC-4 and Tca8113 cells, while knockdown of Twist decreased the IC50 to 2.6 and 3.3 μM, respectively (Fig. 4).
Effects of overexpression and knockdown of miR-23a and Twist on cisplatin-induced apoptosis in TSCC cells
We next examined the individual effect of and interaction between miR-23a and Twist on cisplatin-induced apoptosis in the TSCC cells. Under normal culture conditions, overexpression and knockdown of miR-23a and Twist showed no significant effect on TSCC cell apoptosis compared with the controls (data not shown). After 30 h of cisplatin (20 μM) treatment, the percentages of apoptotic cells in SCC-4 (Fig. 5) and Tca8113 (Fig. 6) cells were 20.1 and 22.7%, respectively. Overexpression of miR-23a significantly decreased cell apoptosis to 8.3 and 11.9%, respectively, which was completely reversed by knockdown of Twist or by SP600125 (10 μM) (Figs. 5 and 6). In contrast, knockdown of miR-23a respectively increased cell apoptosis to 31.2 and 34.0%, which was abolished by overexpression of Twist (Figs. 5 and 6). Overexpression of Twist decreased apoptosis of SCC-4 (Fig. 5) and Tca8113 (Fig. 6) cells to 6.7 and 8.1%, respectively, while knockdown of Twist increased cell apoptosis to 41.4 and 39.6%, respectively.
Discussion
TSCC is associated with poorer survival and a lower rate of local tumor control than other sites of head and neck cancer (1). Innate or acquired resistance to cisplatin, a standard chemotherapy agent for TSCC, is common in patients with TSCC (4–6). Increased expression of miR-23a reportedly promotes cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells (3). High expression of Twist is also associated with cancer chemoresistance (10) and poor prognosis of TSCC patients (11). In the present study, we demonstrate that miR-23a promotes cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells largely through Twist.
We employed cisplatin IC50 as a measure of cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells. A higher IC50 value was considered to correspond to clinical chemoresistance to cisplatin (16). As evidenced by overexpression and knockdown experiments, miR-23a and Twist individually increased cisplatin IC50/cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells. Knockdown of Twist abolished the chemoresistance-promoting effect of overexpressing miR-23a, while overexpression of Twist completely reversed the inhibitory effect of knocking down miR-23a on cisplatin chemoresistance. The findings indicate that Twist is functionally downstream of miR-23a and largely mediates the promoting effects of miR-23a on cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells, which corroborates our finding that miR-23a induces Twist expression in TSCC cells. In addition, miR-23a and Twist individually showed a protective effect against cisplatin-induced apoptosis in TSCC cells. Knockdown of Twist abolished the protective effect of overexpressing miR-23a, while overexpression of Twist completely reversed the apoptosis-enhancing effect of knocking down miR-23a. The protective effect of miR-23a/Twist signaling against cisplatin-induced apoptosis serves as a mechanistic explanation for miR-23a/Twist-induced cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells.
Overexpression and knockdown of miR-23a in TSCC cells respectively increased and decreased the expression of Twist at both the mRNA and the protein levels, yet not vice versa. In addition, a selective JNK inhibitor readily abolished miR-23a-induced Twist expression in TSCC cells without significantly altering the expression of miR-23a, indicating that miR-23a induces Twist expression in a JNK-dependent manner in TSCC cells. How miR-23a induces the expression of Twist through JNK in TSCC cells will be explored by us in subsequent studies.
While selective JNK inhibitor SP600125 cancelled the promoting effects of miR-23a on cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells, overexpression of Twist still significantly augmented cisplatin chemoresistance in the presence of SP600125. The results suggest that miR-23a and Twist act functionally upstream and downstream of JNK, respectively. This is in agreement with our findings that while overexpression and knockdown of miR-23a respectively increased and decreased JNK activity, Twist showed no significant effect on JNK activity in TSCC cells. This is also in agreement with a previous report that JNK signaling may control the expression of twist (17). Previous studies have suggested that the JNK signaling pathway is clearly a basis for resistance to DNA-damaging drugs (18). Our findings indicate that JNK mediates miR-23a-induced Twist expression in TSCC cells, which markedly promotes cisplatin chemoresistance. Therefore, the functional role of JNK signaling in cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells is at least partially fulfilled through miR-23a/Twist signaling.
Yu et al demonstrated that miR-23a functions as an upstream regulator of DNA topoisomerase IIβ to induce cisplatin chemo-resistance in TSCC cells (3). In the present study, we showed that miR-23a promotes cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells through Twist. Thus, whether and how TOP2B and Twist would interact to impact cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells would be a significant topic for future studies. Cisplatin elicits DNA repair mechanisms by crosslinking DNA, which in turn activates apoptosis when repair proves impossible (19). In the present study, we only examined the effect of miR-23a/Twist signaling on cisplatin chemoresistance in TSCC cells. It is unclear whether miR-23a/Twist would impact chemoresistance to other types of chemotherapy agents. Further studies with more types of chemotherapy agents and TSCC cell lines would elucidate this issue. In addition, since Twist has been associated with chemoresistance in a variety of cancers such as nasopharyngeal, breast, prostate and lung cancer (10,20), it is worth defining the role of miR-23a/Twist signaling in other cancer types besides TSCC in future studies.
In conclusion, the present study for the first time demonstrated that miR-23a promotes cisplatin chemoresistance and protects against cisplatin-induced apoptosis in TSCC cells through inducing Twist expression by a JNK-dependent mechanism. It adds new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying TSCC chemoresistance.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Science and Technology Bureau of Hunan Province (grant no. 2013-SK-3203).
References
Choi KK, Kim MJ, Yun PY, Lee JH, Moon HS, Lee TR and Myoung H: Independent prognostic factors of 861 cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Korean adults. Oral Oncol. 42:208–217. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Xing Y, Qi J, Deng S, Wang C, Zhang L and Chen J: Small interfering RNA targeting ILK inhibits metastasis in human tongue cancer cells through repression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Exp Cell Res. 319:2058–2072. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu ZW, Zhong LP, Ji T, Zhang P, Chen WT and Zhang CP: MicroRNAs contribute to the chemoresistance of cisplatin in tongue squamous cell carcinoma lines. Oral Oncol. 46:317–322. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Price KA and Cohen EE: Current treatment options for metastatic head and neck cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 13:35–46. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wingo PA, Tong T and Bolden S: Cancer statistics, 1995. CA Cancer J Clin. 45:8–30. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gu Y, Fan S, Xiong Y, Peng B, Zheng G, Yu Y, Ouyang Y and He Z: Cloning and functional characterization of TCRP1, a novel gene mediating resistance to cisplatin in an oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line. FEBS Lett. 585:881–887. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Feng B, Wang R and Chen LB: Review of miR-200b and cancer chemosensitivity. Biomed Pharmacother. 66:397–402. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 116:281–297. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Filipowicz W, Jaskiewicz L, Kolb FA and Pillai RS: Post-transcriptional gene silencing by siRNAs and miRNAs. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 15:331–341. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ansieau S, Morel AP, Hinkal G, Bastid J and Puisieux A: TWISTing an embryonic transcription factor into an oncoprotein. Oncogene. 29:3173–3184. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
da Silva SD, Alaoui-Jamali MA, Soares FA, Carraro DM, Brentani HP, Hier M, Rogatto SR and Kowalski LP: TWIST1 is a molecular marker for a poor prognosis in oral cancer and represents a potential therapeutic target. Cancer. 120:352–362. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Matsuo N, Shiraha H, Fujikawa T, Takaoka N, Ueda N, Tanaka S, Nishina S, Nakanishi Y, Uemura M, Takaki A, Nakamura S, Kobayashi Y, Nouso K, Yagi T and Yamamoto K: Twist expression promotes migration and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 9:2402009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Muniyappa H and Das KC: Activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) by widely used specific p38 MAPK inhibitors SB202190 and SB203580: a MLK-3-MKK7-dependent mechanism. Cell Signal. 20:675–683. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ding X, Zhang Z, Li S and Wang A: Combretastatin A4 phosphate induces programmed cell death in vascular endothelial cells. Oncol Res. 19:303–309. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Venugopal SK, Chen J, Zhang Y, Clemens D, Follenzi A and Zern MA: Role of MAPK phosphatase-1 in sustained activation of JNK during ethanol-induced apoptosis in hepatocyte-like VL-17A cells. J Biol Chem. 282:31900–31908. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu M, Wang J, Huang H, Hou J, Zhang B and Wang A: miR-181a-Twist1 pathway in the chemoresistance of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 441:364–370. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhan X, Feng X, Kong Y, Chen Y and Tan W: JNK signaling maintains the mesenchymal properties of multi-drug resistant human epidermoid carcinoma KB cells through snail and twist1. BMC Cancer. 13:1802013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vasilevskaya I and O’Dwyer PJ: Role of Jun and Jun kinase in resistance of cancer cells to therapy. Drug Resist Updat. 6:147–156. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rosenberg B, VanCamp L, Trosko JE and Mansour VH: Platinum compounds: a new class of potent antitumour agents. Nature. 222:385–386. 1969. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Entz-Werlé N, Choquet P, Neuville A, Kuchler-Bopp S, Clauss F, Danse JM, Simo-Noumbissie P, Guérin E, Gaub MP, Freund JN, Boehm N, Constantinesco A, Lutz P, Guenot D and Perrin-Schmitt F: Targeted Apc;Twist double-mutant mice: a new model of spontaneous osteosarcoma that mimics the human disease. Transl Oncol. 3:344–353. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |