AMD3100 reduces CXCR4-mediated survival and metastasis of osteosarcoma by inhibiting JNK and Akt, but not p38 or Erk1/2, pathways in in vitro and mouse experiments
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 19, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.3992
- Pages: 33-42
-
Copyright: © Liao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY_NC 3.0].
Abstract
Introduction
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy. It mainly affects children and adolescents (1), and is often localized to the distal femur and proximal tibia. OS has a high propensity for lung metastasis, which is the leading cause of OS-related mortality, with 13–27% of OS patients presenting with lung metastases at diagnosis and 40% eventually developing metastasis (2–4). Despite advances in adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection, 5-year survival rates for OS patients without and with metastases are 60–65 and 20–29%, respectively (4). To better understand this disease, the mechanisms that regulate its progression and metastasis must be elucidated.
Chemokines and their receptors were initially identified as mediators of leukocyte migration to infection and inflammation sites, but have been increasingly shown to modulate tumor development, angiogenesis and metastasis (5–7). Chemokines are a superfamily of 8- to 12-kDa chemoattractant cytokines that are constitutively secreted by stromal cells, including fibroblasts and endothelial cells (8,9). Chemokine receptors are G protein-coupled seven-transmembrane cell-surface receptors to which their ligands bind with high affinity (10). At present, more than 50 chemokines and at least 20 chemokine receptors have been confirmed. Chemokines and their receptors are divided into four groups: C, CC, CXC, CX3C for chemokines and CXCR, CCR, XCR, CX3CR for its receptors based on the number and position of conserved cysteines, where C is the number of cysteine residues and X denotes the number of amino acids between conserved cysteines (10). The CXC subgroup is further classified into ELR+ and ELR− chemokines, based on the presence of the tripeptide glutamic acid-leucine-arginine (the ‘ELR’ motif) (11). Notably, ELR+ CXC chemokines stimulate angiogenesis, whereas most ELR− CXC chemokines inhibit angiogenesis, with the exception of CXCL12, an angiogenic ELR− CXC chemokine (11).
Of all the chemokines and their receptors, the interaction between CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 is the most widely studied due to its pivotal role in carcinogenesis (12). CXCL12, also designated as stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), is secreted by stromal cells including fibroblasts and endothelial cells, and is widely expressed in many organs including lung, liver, skeletal muscle, brain, kidney, heart, skin and bone marrow (8). CXCR4 was initially identified as the co-receptor that facilitates entry of T-tropic (X4) HIV viruses into CD4+ T cells. CXCR4 is the cognate receptor for CXCL12 (13,14), and its expression has been found in a wide range of tissues including brain, lymph node and small intestine (15) and monocytes, B and naive T cells, and early hematopoietic progenitor cells in the immune system (16). More importantly, CXCR4 overexpression has been detected in at least 23 different types of human cancer (17). As tumor cells that express CXCR4 are thought to be more likely to migrate to organs with abundant sources of CXCL12 (10), CXCR4 has long been considered a crucial mediator of metastasis for various types of tumors including OS (9,18–22). Hypoxia promotes human OS migration by inducing CXCR4 expression via hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) activation (23). The anti-metastatic effect of sorafenib chemotherapy on human OS cells includes CXCR4 downregulation (24). Lung metastases of human OS cell-derived orthotopic xenografts in a mouse model could be suppressed by CXCR4 antibody treatment (25). However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have shown that the expression of CXCL12 and CXCR4 correlates with a better long-term outcome and with a lower prevalence of metastases in OS (26). Despite accumulating evidence that CXCL12 and CXCR4 affect proliferation and growth of ovarian (27), prostate (28,29) and breast cancer (9,30,31), glioma (32), glioblastoma (33,34), esophageal cancer (35), Ewing’s sarcoma (36) and chondrosarcoma (7), the role of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis in the survival and growth of OS cells remains to be investigated. Miura et al (37) showed that the ability to form tumors in vivo positively correlated with CXCR4 levels in human OS cells.
The CXCR4 antagonist, AMD3100, is a small bicyclam molecule that was originally used to prevent X4-Tropic HIV-1 viruses entering into CD4+ T cells via CXCR4 (38). It was subsequently approved to treat multiple myeloma and lymphoma due to its safety and efficiency in stimulating hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (39,40). CXCR4 inhibition from AMD3100 reportedly decreases the CXCL12-induced migration of OS cells (22,41). However, little is known about the effect of AMD3100 on OS cell survival and growth, or the exact mechanisms of CXCL12-CXCR4 interaction and the effect of AMD3100 on downstream pathways. In recent years, more attention has been paid to the participation of CXCR7, a novel decoy receptor of CXCL12, in the CXCL12-CXCR4-mediated OS progression and metastasis. The critical role of CXCR7 in mediating OS progression in the lungs and its lung metastasis-enhancing effect on OS expressing CXCR4 has been reported (42,43). CXCR7 is also found to be involved in OS proliferation (44).
In the present study, we aimed to: i) detect the expression of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in two OS cell lines; ii) investigate the roles of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis and AMD3100 in OS cell survival and migration in vitro; iii) identify downstream pathways regulated by CXCL12/CXCR4 in OS; and iv) assess the effect of AMD3100 on primary tumor growth and lung metastasis in an OS animal model.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and reagents
The murine LM8 and Dunn OS cell lines were kindly donated by Dr Eugenie Kleinerman (M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA). The cell lines were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM-h; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. The cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Recombinant murine CXCL12 was purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) and AMD3100 from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The rabbit antibodies (Ab) used for western blotting were obtained from different resources: anti-CXCR4 polyclonal Ab, anti-CXCR7 polyclonal Ab (both from Abcam, Cambridge, MA USA), anti-phospho-SAPK/JNK monoclonal Ab (MAb) (Thr183/Tyr185), anti-SAPK/JNK MAb, anti-phospho-c-Jun MAb (Ser73), anti-c-Jun MAb, anti-phospho-Akt MAb (Ser473), anti-Akt MAb, anti-phospho-p38 MAPK MAb (Thr180/Tyr182), anti-p38 MAPK MAb, anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2; Thr202/Tyr204) MAb, anti-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2), anti-caspase-3 MAb, anti-caspase-8 MAb and anti-PARP MAb (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), and anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, inc. Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
MTT assay
The effects of CXCL12 and AMD3100 on the survival of two OS cell lines (LM8 and Dunn) were assessed using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 2×103/well in DMEM-h. After overnight growth, the cells were cultured for 7 days in FBS-free medium in the presence of 0 or 100 ng/ml CXCL12, 30 μM AMD3100 alone or 100 ng/ml CXCL12 with 10, 20 or 30 μM AMD3100. The FBS-free cells without 100 ng/ml CXCL12 or AMD3100 served as the control group. After the 7 day incubation, 20 μl MTT (5 mg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added into each well and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Culture medium was removed and 150 μl dimethylsulfoxide was added. The optical density (OD) was then measured using a model ELx800 microplate reader (Bio-Tech instruments inc.) at 490 nm. The cell viability was calculated using the equation: Cell viability (%) = (OD490nm of treatment/OD490nm of control) ×100%.
Migration assay
The migration assay was performed using Transwell assay (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA; pore size, 8-μm) in 24-well dishes. Prior to the assay, OS cells (LM8 and Dunn) were pretreated for 24 h in FBS-free medium with or without 30 μM AMD3100. Then, 1×105 cells in 200 μl of FBS-free DMeM-h medium were placed in the upper chamber, and 500 μl of the same medium containing 100 ng/ml CXCL12 in the lower chamber. Additionally, 500 μl FBS-free and 10% FBS DMeM-h medium was placed in the lower chamber as negative and positive controls, respectively. Plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2; culture medium was then removed and filters were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice. The cells on the upper side of filters were removed with cotton-tipped swabs. The cells on the underside of the filters were fixed in 95% alcohol for 10 min and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 15 min. Cells that migrated from the upper to the lower side of the filter were counted under a light microscope by counting 10 random fields at a magnification of ×100. This assay was performed in triplicate.
Flow cytometric analysis
To detect CXCR4, LM8 and Dunn cells (3×105/well) were incubated in 6-well plates with DMEM-h + 10% FBS for 24 h, washed in cold PBS three times, and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min and resuspended them in 50 μl PBS in flow cytometry (FCM) tubes. The cells were incubated with 5 μl phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse CXCR4 or PE-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG2b (κ as an isotype control) at 4°C for 45 min, and analyzed by FCM using FACSCalibur and CellQuest software (both from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).
To observe the effects of CXCL12 and AMD3100 on cell apoptosis, LM8 and Dunn cells (1×105/well) were cultured in FBS-free medium for 7 days with 0 or 100 ng/ml CXCL12, or 100 ng/ml CXCL12 with 10, 20 or 30 μM AMD3100. After the 7 day incubation, the cells were washed twice in cold PBS, centrifuged and mixed in 100 μl 1Χ binding buffer, and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 min with 5 μl of Annexin V-FiTC and 5 μl of propidium iodide (Pi) prior to analysis. Apoptosis was detected by FCM and analyzed using CellQuest software. Dual parameter dot plots combining Annexin V-FITC/PI showed living cells in the lower-left (Annexin V−/PI−), early apoptotic cells in the lower right (Annexin V+/PI−), late apoptotic cells in the upper right (Annexin V−/PI+), and necrotic cells in the upper left (Annexin V+/PI+) quadrant. Total apoptotic rates were calculated as sums of rates observed in the lower- and upper-right quadrants (45).
Western blot analysis
Western blotting was used to detect CXCR4 and CXCR7 in LM8 and Dunn cells, and phosphorylation of signaling molecules. The cells were starved in FBS-free medium for 48 h in the presence of 0 or 100 ng/ml CXCL12, or 100 ng/ml CXCL12 with 10, 20 or 30 μM AMD3100. Cellular lysates were obtained using RiPA lysis buffer (Beyotime institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China), protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Thermo Scientific). Protein concentrations were calculated using the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific). Equivalent amounts of total protein (30 μg) from each sample were separated by electrophoresis on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels at 80 volts and transferred to nitrocel lulose membranes. After blocking with TBST containing 5% skim milk for 1 h, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with 1:1,000 dilution of rabbit primary antibodies [CXCR4, CXCR7, phospho-SAPK/JNK, SAPK/JNK, phospho-c-Jun, c-Jun, phospho-Akt, Akt, phospho-p38 MAPK, p38 MAPK, phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2), p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2), caspase-3 and -8, PARP, β-actin], followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit IgG) at room temperature for 1 h. Expression of proteins was analyzed using the Odyssey infrared laser imaging system.
Animal experiments
Ten 4-week-old female C3H mice were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The mice were housed under standard conditions with a 12-h light-dark cycle and fed with sufficient water and food. All the animal procedures were performed in accordance with a protocol approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai Tongji University. A single-cell suspension of ~106 LM8 cells in 10 μl of PBS was injected into the right tibia medullary cavity to establish an orthotopic animal model of OS. Two weeks after transplantation, the mice were randomly allocated to the AMD3100-treated (n=6) and the PBS-treated group (n=4; controls). Each mouse in the treatment group received 100 μl AMD3100 (5 mg/kg, diluted with PBS) by tail vein injection every 2 days. The control mice were injected with 100 μl PBS in the same manner. After 10 continuous injections in the two groups, the mice were euthanized to observe the primary tumor size. Posterior limbs with tumors were weighed. Lung metastasis was detected by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.
Statistical analysis
All the experiments were repeated at least three times. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism v5.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Measurement data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Experiments with two groups were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.
Results
Expression of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in OS cells
Western blotting was used to determine whether CXCR4 and CXCR7 were expressed in LM8 and Dunn cells. LM8 but not Dunn cells, expressed high CXCR4 protein levels (Fig. 1A). Similarly, FCM showed that 4.1% of LM8 cells, but only 0.2% of Dunn cells, expressed cell-surface CXCR4 (Fig. 1B). The LM8 and Dunn cell lines did not express CXCR7 (Fig. 1A).
CXCL12 enhances serum-starved OS cell survival by binding CXCR4, but this effect can be abrogated by AMD3100
To investigate the effects of CXCL12 and AMD3100 on cell survival, OS cells were cultured for 7 days in FBS-free medium in the presence of 0 or 100 ng/ml CXCL12, 30 μM AMD3100 alone, or 100 ng/ml CXCL12 with 10, 20 or 30 μM AMD3100, and then analyzed for cell viability. The results showed that 100 ng/ml CXCL12 significantly increased the survival rate of CXCR4+ LM8 cells compared with the controls (P<0.05, Fig. 2). However, no similar effect was observed in CXCR4-Dunn cells (P>0.05, Fig. 2). As the two cell lines lacked CXCR7 expression (as described above), the function of which should be taken into account in the effects of CXCL12/CXCR4 on tumor survival, these results suggested that CXCL12 promotes OS cell survival through CXCR4 receptors in the absence of serum.
To confirm whether CXCL12-induced cell survival depends on binding to CXCR4, we used the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 (10, 20 or 30 μM) to block CXCR4 in OS cells. We found that inhibition of CXCR4 by AMD3100 significantly reduced LM8 cell survival in the presence of CXCL12 (P<0.05, Fig. 2), but had no effect on CXCR4− Dunn cells. However, the AMD3100 inhibition of LM8 cell survival was not dose-dependent (P>0.05, Fig. 2). Furthermore, survival of LM8 cells treated with 30 μM AMD3100 alone was not altered (P>0.05, Fig. 2). These results showed that blocking CXCR4 with AMD3100 decreases the CXCL12-induced survival of CXCR4+ OS cells, and this effect was not concentration-dependent.
CXCL12 protects serum-starved CXCR4+ OS cells from apoptosis and this effect can be reversed by AMD3100
To examine whether CXCL12 and AMD3100 affect apoptosis, cells were starved in FBS-free medium for 7 days with 0 or 100 ng/ml CXCL12, or 100 ng/ml CXCL12 with 10, 20 or 30 μM AMD3100. The total percentage of apoptotic LM8 cells (including early- and late-stage apoptosis) in the FBS-free group was 83.7%, but only 33.2% in the 100 ng/ml CXCL12 group (P<0.05), and 36.5, 40.1 or 45.8%, respectively, in LM8 cells treated with 100 ng/ml CXCL12 combined with 10, 20 or 30 μM AMD3100 (Fig. 3). However, the percentages of apoptotic Dunn cells did not significantly vary between the FBS-free control group (92.4%) and the 100 ng/ml CXCL12 group (96.0%; P>0.05, Fig. 3), and were 93.5, 94.3 or 96.4%, respectively, in Dunn cells treated with different AMD3100 concentrations. These results showed that CXCL12 prevents apoptosis in serum-starved CXCR4+ OS cells via the activation of CXCR4. As blocking CXCR4 with 30 μM AMD3100 led to significantly higher apoptosis percentages compared with the CXCL12 group (P<0.05), the addition of 30 μM AMD3100 in CXCL12 appeared to partly reverse its anti-apoptotic effect.
AMD3100 impairs CXCR4-dependent, CXCL12-induced migration of OS cells
To determine whether CXCL12 regulated OS migration, the cells were treated in FBS-free medium with 0 or 30 μM AMD3100 for 24 h before adding CXCL12. The number of migrated LM8 cells increased by 83.7% in the presence of CXCL12 compared with the negative controls (Fig. 4A and B), whereas the migration of LM8 cells pretreated with AMD3100 was notably inhibited in response to CXCL12. Notably, CXCL12 also attracted migration of CXCR4− Dunn cells (Fig. 4A and B), whereas AMD3100 pretreatment did not decrease their CXCL12-induced migration due to CXCR4 deficiency. These results suggested that CXCR4 inhibition by AMD3100 significantly reduced CXCR4-mediated, CXCL12-induced OS cell migration.
CXCL12 activates JNK and Akt pathways in OS by binding to CXCR4
Binding of CXCL12 to its cognate receptor CXCR4 is thought to activate several downstream pathways that regulate cell chemotaxis, survival, proliferation and migration (10). However, little is known regarding signaling pathways modulated by interactions of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in OS. To further identify specific downstream pathways by which CXCL12 and AMD3100 modulate OS behavior, including survival and metastasis, we performed western blotting to detect the phosphorylation levels of JNK, c-Jun, Akt, p38 and Erk1/2 in variously treated LM8 and Dunn cell groups. In LM8 cells, CXCL12 induced the phosphorylation of Akt, JNK and c-Jun, which was dose-dependently attenuated by AMD3100, but not the phosphorylation of p38 or erk1/2 (Fig. 5A and B). In the Dunn cells, none of these signaling pathway proteins were phosphorylated (Fig. 5C and D). These results indicated that activation of Akt, JNK and c-Jun occurred through CXCL12 binding to CXCR4, an effect that was weakened by blocking CXCR4 with AMD3100.
The anti-apoptotic effect of CXCL12 depends on the inactivation of cleaved PARP
As previously discussed, CXCL12 protects CXCR4+ LM8 cells from apoptosis induced by serum deprivation. However, the mechanism of this anti-apoptotic effect remains unclear. As the caspase family is crucial to tumor cell apoptosis (45), caspase-3 and -8, and PARP expression were detected by western blotting to investigate whether CXCL12 affected the regulation of caspase-dependent apoptosis. The presence of cleaved PARP, which ultimately leads to tumor cell apoptosis, was markedly decreased in the presence of CXCL12 in LM8 cells compared with the controls, although this result was not observed in Dunn cells (Fig. 6A and B). However, cleaved caspase-3 and -8 were not detected in LM8 and Dunn cells (Fig. 6A and B). These results showed that CXCL12 decreased apoptosis in serum-deprived CXCR4+ LM8 cells by decreasing cleaved PARP.
AMD3100 inhibits primary tumor growth and lung metastasis in vivo
To evaluate the tumor-inhibiting effect of AMD3100 in vivo, we established an orthotopic OS model by an intratibial injection of LM8 cells in mice, which were then injected with PBS alone (n=4, control group) or PBS with 5 mg/kg AMD3100 (n=6) every 2 days for 10 injections. The mice were then euthanized to observe primary tumor growth. Whereas the control group had large tumors, the tumors in AMD3100-treated group were not large enough to be observed with a naked eye (Fig. 7A). Posterior limbs with tumors resected from mice in the AMD3100-treated group were also lighter in weight than those of the control group (Fig. 7B). The H&E-stained lung tissues also showed tumor metastases to be notably smaller in the AMD3100-treated group than in the PBS control group (Fig. 7C).
Discussion
Osteosarcoma (OS) has a markedly high risk of lung metastasis and poor survival. Accumulating evidence has confirmed involvement of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis in the progression and metastasis of various types of cancer (18,19,34,46). To verify CXCR4 and/or CXCR7 participation in OS survival and metastasis, we first detected the expression of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in the murine LM8 and Dunn OS cell lines. LM8 was derived from Dunn using the Fidler method for generating metastatic clones of cancer cells. The metastatic potential of LM8 cells is higher than that of Dunn cells due to its higher expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)-2 and -9, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and β-catenin, which are crucial for metastasis (47). Consistent with that report, our western blotting results show that in LM8 cells, CXCR4 expression, which is widely considered to be an important biomarker for metastasis, is clearly higher than that in Dunn cells. Additionally, our FCM results show 4.1% of LM8 cells, but only 0.2% of Dunn cells, express cell-surface CXCR4. CXCR7, a novel decoy receptor of CXCL12, was identified in 2005 (48), and although its role in OS should also be taken into consideration, CXCR7 was not expressed in the LM8 or Dunn cells (Fig. 1A). Consistent with our observations, the study by Goguet-Surmenian et al (42) revealed that CXCR7 expression was undetectable in murine K7M2 and human SaOS-LM7 OS cells. Those authors indicated that CXCR7 was mainly expressed in tumor-associated blood vessels and rarely on tumor cells. CXCR7 was also not detected in human 143B OS cells by semi-quantitative RT-PCR and FACS analysis as reported by Brennecke et al (43). However, MG-63 and U-2OS OS cells, both expressing CXCR7, were utilized by Zhang et al to evaluate the role of CXCR7 in OS (44). As shown by our results, CXCR7 was not expressed in LM8 or Dunn cells, suggesting that CXCR4-CXCR7 crosstalk is not a factor when their ligand CXCL12 binds to LM8 or Dunn cells. In other words, only the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis affects progression and metastasis in these cells.
Previous studies have focused on the role of CXCR4 in OS metastasis (20–22), whereas little attention has been paid to CXCR4-mediated survival and growth in OS. Berghuis et al (36) reported that CXCL12 induced proliferation of serum-starved CXCR4+ Ewing sarcoma cells, and this effect was disturbed by AMD3100 in vitro. Concordantly, our results also showed the viability of serum-starved CXCR4+ LM8 cells in the presence of CXCL12 for 7 days to increase by 87% compared with the control groups, whereas this CXCL12-induced increased proliferation effect was not observed in CXCR4− Dunn cells (Fig. 2). Furthermore, we found that AMD3100 abolition of CXCL12-induced survival of LM8 cells is not dose-dependent, and treatment with AMD3100 alone does not alter LM8 cell survival. However, a study by Kim et al (49) revealed that CXCL12 did not affect the proliferation of CXCR4+ myeloma cells, and AMD3100 has dual effects, initially enhancing and subsequently inhibiting myeloma cell proliferation. One possible explanation for the opposite results may be that the observation time points we selected are different. To be specific, we evaluated long-term (7 days) effects of CXCL12 and AMD3100, whereas shorter-term (3 days) effects were assessed by Kim et al (49).
Another important finding in the present study is that CXCL12 protects CXCR4+ LM8 cells from serum-deprivation-induced apoptosis by inactivating cleaved PARP. Activation of caspase family proteins can irreversibly initiate protein degradation and apoptosis (50,51). Caspase-3 is considered to be of great importance among the caspases since its activated form cleaves PARP, which ultimately results in the apoptosis of tumor cells (45,50). The percentage of apoptotic LM8 cells treated with CXCL12 decreased by 0.60-fold to 33.2% compared with the controls (Fig. 3). To determine the anti-apoptosis mechanism of CXCL12, we used western blotting to detect the expression of caspase-3 and -8, and PARP, which play important roles in apoptosis. Although cleaved caspase-3 and -8 were not expressed in LM8 or Dunn, cleaved PARP in CXCL12-treated LM8 cells was significantly less than in the control group.
We also investigated the role of CXCR4 in the migration of OS cells. Previous studies have shown CXCL12-CXCR4 interaction to mediate OS migration and invasiveness and effects can be abrogated by the CXCR4 inhibitor (20,22). Consistent with these findings, our results also indicate that the migration of CXCR4+ LM8 cells increases in the presence of CXCL12 in vitro, although pretreatment with AMD3100 impairs the migration-increasing effect induced by CXCL12. However, CXCL12 also induces the migration of CXCR4− Dunn cells. It is likely that other undefined receptors in Dunn cells also contribute to migration in response to CXCL12. Further investigation is, however, required to confirm this hypothesis.
More importantly, binding of CXCL12 to CXCR4 stimulates the activation of downstream pathways that regulate cell chemotaxis, survival, proliferation and migration. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways have been found to critically affect tumor cell survival and migration, and are important downstream pathways involved in CXCL12/CXCR4 interactions, as summarized in our previous study (10). PI3K activation results in Akt phosphorylation, which induces the activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) transcription factors. MAPK pathways, which include extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-1/2, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38, can also stimulate NF-κB expression (10). Chinni et al (52) demonstrated that CXCL12 induced MMP-9 expression in prostate cancer cells by activating PI3K-Akt-NF-κΒ and MEK pathways. Leelawat et al (53) suggested that the binding of CXCL12 to CXCR4 induced cholangiocarcinoma cell invasiveness by triggering the ERK1/2 and PI3K signaling pathways. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to identify specific downstream pathways, which we deem novel, regulated by CXCL12/CXCR4 interaction in the survival and metastasis of OS. Based on our results that CXCL12 stimulates the phosphorylation of Akt, JNK and c-Jun, which were attenuated by AMD3100 in LM8 cells, we conclude that CXCL12 induces the CXCR4-mediated survival and metastasis of OS by activating Akt and JNK pathways. Of note, this survival and metastasis-enhancing effect can be abolished by AMD3100 via the suppression of Akt and JNK pathways.
To the best of our knowledge, few studies have focused on the role of AMD3100 in inhibiting tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Gros et al (35) reported that primary tumor growth and metastasis in a mouse model of esophageal cancer treated with 5 mg/kg AMD3100 by intraperitoneal injection were significantly reduced. Sun et al (7) also indicated that treatment with 1.25 mg/kg AMD3100 intraperitoneally twice daily for 4 weeks inhibited chondrosarcoma growth and metastasis. By contrast, Domanska et al (29) showed that treatment with 3.5 mg/kg AMD3100 alone for 5 weeks did not affect prostate tumor growth in vivo but sensitized prostate cancer to docetaxel chemotherapy. Despite findings of the AMD3100 effect on other tumors, its in vivo effect on OS growth remains to be determined.
To the best of our knowledge, the present study has shown, for the first time, the antitumor effect of AMD3100 in an OS C3H mouse model established by LM8 cells. Consistent with results with other types of cancer, we found that primary OS tumor growth and lung metastasis in C3H mice treated with 5 mg/kg AMD3100 by tail vein every 2 days for 10 injections were notably less than in the PBS control group.
In conclusion, a novel mechanism has been found to modulate survival and metastasis in OS. Due to a lack of CXCR7 expression, CXCL12 induces cell survival and migration of OS in vitro through CXCR4, which can be abrogated by AMD3100, a CXCR4-specific antagonist. The JNK and Akt pathways affect CXCR4-mediated OS progression and metastasis. The CXCL12-CXCR4 axis is therefore a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of OS.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the NSFC (81202115), the Key Project of Basic Research of Shanghai (11JC1410101), the Shanghai Pujiang Program (12PJ1407100), the Innovative Frontier Technology Program of Shenkang (SHDC12013107), and the Excellent Young Talent Program of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (XYQ2013108).
Abbreviations:
OS |
οsteosarcoma |
CXCL12 |
chemokine 12 |
CXCR4 |
chemokine receptor 4 |
SDF-1 |
stromal cell-derived factor-1 |
HIF-1α |
hypoxia-inducible factor-1α |
CXCR7 |
chemokine receptor 7 |
DMEM-h |
high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium |
FBS |
fetal bovine serum |
OD |
optical density |
FCM |
flow cytometry |
PE |
phycoerythrin |
FITC |
fluorescein isothiocyanate |
PI |
propidium iodide |
MMPs |
matrix metalloproteinases |
VEGF |
vascular endothelial growth factor |
PI3K |
phosphoinositide 3-kinase |
MAPK |
mitogen-activated protein kinase |
NF-κB |
nuclear factor-κB |
ERK |
extracellular signal-regulated kinase |
JNK |
Jun N-terminal kinase |
References
Mirabello L, Troisi RJ and Savage SA: Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer. 115:1531–1543. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mankin HJ, Hornicek FJ, Rosenberg AE, Harmon DC and Gebhardt MC: Survival data for 648 patients with osteosarcoma treated at one institution. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 429:286–291. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bentzen SM: Prognostic factor studies in oncology: Osteosarcoma as a clinical example. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 49:513–518. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Namløs HM, Kresse SH, Müller CR, Henriksen J, Holdhus R, Sæter G, Bruland OS, Bjerkehagen B, Steen VM and Myklebost O: Global gene expression profiling of human osteosarcomas reveals metastasis-associated chemokine pattern. Sarcoma. 2012:6390382012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liberman J, Sartelet H, Flahaut M, Mühlethaler-Mottet A, Coulon A, Nyalendo C, Vassal G, Joseph JM and Gross N: Involvement of the CXCR7/CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in the malignant progression of human neuroblastoma. PLoS One. 7:e436652012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Balkwill F: Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer. 4:540–550. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun X, Charbonneau C, Wei L, Yang W, Chen Q and Terek RM: CXCR4-targeted therapy inhibits VEGF expression and chondrosarcoma angiogenesis and metastasis. Mol Cancer Ther. 12:1163–1170. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Teicher BA and Fricker SP: CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 16:2927–2931. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dewan MZ, Ahmed S, Iwasaki Y, Ohba K, Toi M and Yamamoto N: Stromal cell-derived factor-1 and CXCR4 receptor interaction in tumor growth and metastasis of breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 60:273–276. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liao YX, Zhou CH, Zeng H, Zuo DQ, Wang ZY, Yin F, Hua YQ and Cai ZD: The role of the CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 axis in the progression and metastasis of bone sarcomas (Review). Int J Mol Med. 32:1239–1246. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Vandercappellen J, Van Damme J and Struyf S: The role of CXC chemokines and their receptors in cancer. Cancer Lett. 267:226–244. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Monnier J, Boissan M, L’Helgoualc’h A, Lacombe ML, Turlin B, Zucman-Rossi J, Théret N, Piquet-Pellorce C and Samson M: CXCR7 is up-regulated in human and murine hepatocellular carcinoma and is specifically expressed by endothelial cells. Eur J Cancer. 48:138–148. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Feng Y, Broder CC, Kennedy PE and Berger EA: HIV-1 entry cofactor: Functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 272:872–877. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wegner SA, Ehrenberg PK, Chang G, Dayhoff DE, Sleeker AL and Michael NL: Genomic organization and functional characterization of the chemokine receptor CXCR4, a major entry co-receptor for human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Biol Chem. 273:4754–4760. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang J, Loberg R and Taichman RS: The pivotal role of CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 axis in bone metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 25:573–587. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun X, Cheng G, Hao M, Zheng J, Zhou X, Zhang J, Taichman RS, Pienta KJ and Wang J: CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 chemokine axis and cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 29:709–722. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Balkwill F: The significance of cancer cell expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Semin Cancer Biol. 14:171–179. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ma M, Ye JY, Deng R, Dee CM and Chan GC: Mesenchymal stromal cells may enhance metastasis of neuroblastoma via SDF-1/CXCR4 and SDF-1/CXCR7 signaling. Cancer Lett. 312:1–10. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li X, Ma Q, Xu Q, Liu H, Lei J, Duan W, Bhat K, Wang F, Wu E and Wang Z: SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling induces pancreatic cancer cell invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in vitro through non-canonical activation of Hedgehog pathway. Cancer Lett. 322:169–176. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim SY, Lee CH, Midura BV, Yeung C, Mendoza A, Hong SH, Ren L, Wong D, Korz W, Merzouk A, et al: Inhibition of the CXCR4/CXCL12 chemokine pathway reduces the development of murine pulmonary metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis. 25:201–211. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
de Nigris F, Rossiello R, Schiano C, Arra C, Williams-Ignarro S, Barbieri A, Lanza A, Balestrieri A, Giuliano MT, Ignarro LJ, et al: Deletion of Yin Yang 1 protein in osteosarcoma cells on cell invasion and CXCR4/angiogenesis and metastasis. Cancer Res. 68:1797–1808. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang CY, Lee CY, Chen MY, Yang WH, Chen YH, Chang CH, Hsu HC, Fong YC and Tang CH: Stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 enhanced motility of human osteosarcoma cells involves MeK1/2, ERK and NF-kappaB-dependent pathways. J Cell Physiol. 221:204–212. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guo M, Cai C, Zhao G, Qiu X, Zhao H, Ma Q, Tian L, Li X, Hu Y, Liao B, et al: Hypoxia promotes migration and induces CXCR4 expression via HiF-1α activation in human osteosarcoma. PLoS One. 9:e905182014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Walter I, Wolfesberger B, Miller I, Mair G, Burger S, Gallè B and Steinborn R: Human osteosarcoma cells respond to sorafenib chemotherapy by downregulation of the tumor progression factors S100A4, CXCR4 and the oncogene FOS. Oncol Rep. 31:1147–1156. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Brennecke P, Arlt MJ, Campanile C, Husmann K, Gvozdenovic A, Apuzzo T, Thelen M, Born W and Fuchs B: CXCR4 antibody treatment suppresses metastatic spread to the lung of intratibial human osteosarcoma xenografts in mice. Clin Exp Metastasis. 31:339–349. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baumhoer D, Smida J, Zillmer S, Rosemann M, Atkinson MJ, Nelson PJ, Jundt G, von Luettichau I and Nathrath M: Strong expression of CXCL12 is associated with a favorable outcome in osteosarcoma. Mod Pathol. 25:522–528. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Scotton CJ, Wilson JL, Scott K, Stamp G, Wilbanks GD, Fricker S, Bridger G and Balkwill FR: Multiple actions of the chemokine CXCL12 on epithelial tumor cells in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 62:5930–5938. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun YX, Wang J, Shelburne CE, Lopatin DE, Chinnaiyan AM, Rubin MA, Pienta KJ and Taichman RS: Expression of CXCR4 and CXCL12 (SDF-1) in human prostate cancers (PCa) in vivo. J Cell Biochem. 89:462–473. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Domanska UM, Timmer-Bosscha H, Nagengast WB, Oude Munnink TH, Kruizinga RC, Ananias HJ, Kliphuis NM, Huls G, De Vries EG, de Jong IJ, et al: CXCR4 inhibition with AMD3100 sensitizes prostate cancer to docetaxel chemotherapy. Neoplasia. 14:709–718. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith MC, Luker KE, Garbow JR, Prior JL, Jackson E, Piwnica-Worms D and Luker GD: CXCR4 regulates growth of both primary and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 64:8604–8612. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Orimo A, Gupta PB, Sgroi DC, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Delaunay T, Naeem R, Carey VJ, Richardson AL and Weinberg RA: Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion. Cell. 121:335–348. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou Y, Larsen PH, Hao C and Yong VW: CXCR4 is a major chemokine receptor on glioma cells and mediates their survival. J Biol Chem. 277:49481–49487. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Barbero S, Bonavia R, Bajetto A, Porcile C, Pirani P, Ravetti JL, Zona GL, Spaziante R, Florio T and Schettini G: Stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha stimulates human glioblastoma cell growth through the activation of both extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 and Akt. Cancer Res. 63:1969–1974. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ehtesham M, Mapara KY, Stevenson CB and Thompson RC: CXCR4 mediates the proliferation of glioblastoma progenitor cells. Cancer Lett. 274:305–312. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Gros SJ, Kurschat N, Drenckhan A, Dohrmann T, Forberich E, Effenberger K, Reichelt U, Hoffman RM, Pantel K, Kaifi JT, et al: Involvement of CXCR4 chemokine receptor in metastastic HER2-positive esophageal cancer. PLoS One. 7:e472872012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Berghuis D, Schilham MW, Santos SJ, Savola S, Knowles HJ, Dirksen U, Schaefer KL, Vakkila J, Hogendoorn PC and Lankester AC: The CXCR4-CXCL12 axis in Ewing sarcoma: Promotion of tumor growth rather than metastatic disease. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2:242012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miura K, Uniyal S, Leabu M, Oravecz T, Chakrabarti S, Morris VL and Chan BM: Chemokine receptor CXCR4-beta1 integrin axis mediates tumorigenesis of osteosarcoma HOS cells. Biochem Cell Biol. 83:36–48. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hendrix CW, Collier AC, Lederman MM, Schols D, Pollard RB, Brown S, Jackson JB, Coombs RW, Glesby MJ, Flexner CW, et al AMD3100 HIV Study Group: Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of AMD3100, a selective CXCR4 receptor inhibitor, in HIV-1 infection. J Acquir immune Defic Syndr. 37:1253–1262. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Devine SM, Flomenberg N, Vesole DH, Liesveld J, Weisdorf D, Badel K, Calandra G and DiPersio JF: Rapid mobilization of CD34+ cells following administration of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 to patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 22:1095–1102. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cashen A, Lopez S, Gao F, Calandra G, MacFarland R, Badel K and DiPersio J: A phase II study of plerixafor (AMD3100) plus G-CSF for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 14:1253–1261. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang P, Dong L, Yan K, Long H, Yang TT, Dong MQ, Zhou Y, Fan QY and Ma BA: CXCR4-mediated osteosarcoma growth and pulmonary metastasis is promoted by mesenchymal stem cells through VEGF. Oncol Rep. 30:1753–1761. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Goguet-Surmenian E, Richard-Fiardo P, Guillemot E, Benchetrit M, Gomez-Brouchet A, Buzzo P, Karimdjee-Soilihi B, Alemanno P, Michiels JF, Schmid-Alliana A, et al: CXCR7-mediated progression of osteosarcoma in the lungs. Br J Cancer. 109:1579–1585. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brennecke P, Arlt MJ, Muff R, Campanile C, Gvozdenovic A, Husmann K, Holzwarth N, Cameroni E, Ehrensperger F, Thelen M, et al: Expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR7 in CXCR4-expressing human 143B osteosarcoma cells enhances lung metastasis of intratibial xenografts in SCID mice. PLoS One. 8:e740452013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang Y, Yang CQ, Gao Y, Wang C, Zhang CL and Zhou XH: Knockdown of CXCR7 inhibits proliferation and invasion of osteosarcoma cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt and β-arrestin pathways. Oncol Rep. 32:965–972. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zeng H, Sun M, Zhou C, Yin F, Wang Z, Hua Y and Cai Z: Hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether-mediated photodynamic therapy selectively kills sarcomas by inducing apoptosis. PLoS One. 8:e777272013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen Z, Pan X, Georgakilas AG, Chen P, Hu H, Yang Y, Tian S, Xia L, Zhang J, Cai X, et al: Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) protects cerebral neurocytes and inhibits glioma by down regulating chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression. Cancer Lett. 336:281–289. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ek ET, Dass CR and Choong PF: Commonly used mouse models of osteosarcoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 60:1–8. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Balabanian K, Lagane B, Infantino S, Chow KY, Harriague J, Moepps B, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Thelen M and Bachelerie F: The chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12 binds to and signals through the orphan receptor RDC1 in T lymphocytes. J Biol Chem. 280:35760–35766. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim HY, Hwang JY, Kim SW, Lee HJ, Yun HJ, Kim S and Jo DY: The CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 has dual effects on survival and proliferation of myeloma cells in vitro. Cancer Res Treat. 42:225–234. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu J, Wu Y, Wang B, Yuan X and Fang B: High levels of glucose induced the caspase-3/PARP signaling pathway, leading to apoptosis in human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Cell Biochem Biophys. 66:229–237. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang L, Pan J, Wang T, Song M and Chen W: Pathological cyclic strain-induced apoptosis in human periodontal ligament cells through the RhoGDIα/caspase-3/PARP pathway. PLoS One. 8:e759732013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chinni SR, Sivalogan S, Dong Z, Filho JC, Deng X, Bonfil RD and Cher ML: CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling activates Akt-1 and MMP-9 expression in prostate cancer cells: The role of bone microenvironment-associated CXCL12. Prostate. 66:32–48. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Leelawat K, Leelawat S, Narong S and Hongeng S: Roles of the MEK1/2 and AKT pathways in CXCL12/CXCR4 induced cholangiocarcinoma cell invasion. World J Gastroenterol. 13:1561–1568. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |