Docetaxel-loaded PEG-albumin nanoparticles with improved antitumor efficiency against non-small cell lung cancer
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 8, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.4863
- Pages: 871-876
Abstract
Introduction
Lung cancer is the first ranked malignant tumor with high incidence and mortality worldwide, and more than one million patients are diagnosed with lung cancer each year. Among the various types of lung cancer, NSCLC accounts for 75–85%, and elderly patients aged more than 65 years account for more than 50% (1). Generally when patients are diagnosed at a late stage (stage III or IV) the 5-year survival rate is only 12–15% (2,3), as the patients lost the opportunity for surgical treatment (4,5).
For elderly advanced NSCLC patients, chemotherapy is still the first choice of treatment (6,7), it is relatively effective treatment for elderly NSCLC patients who cannot tolerate surgical operation. It can effectively reduce the progress of lung cancer and the recurrence, enhance the effect of clinical treatment, prolong patient survival rate and improve their quality of life (8).
There are various chemotherapy regimens and drugs for elderly NSCLC patients, such as cisplatin, VP-16, gemcitabine, paclitaxel and docetaxel (9). However, there is still lack of a mature and effective way for NSCLC due to the side-effects of the drugs. Thus, how to choose a drug with benefits and little side effects is a hotspot in tumor research (10,11). Docetaxel is a type of anti-microtubule taxane drug, and it is the only one approved for first- and second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC treatment by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the EU. According to the existing clinical data of current studies, DTX has been proven very effective for NSCLC (12,13).
Biodegradable albumin nanoparticles are thought more and more important during the past few decades (14). Previous studies have been proven that drug-loaded polymeric nanoparticles accumulated in certain tumors more efficiently than other carriers by enhancing permeability and retention (EPR) effect (15,16). Furthermore, another advantage is long circulating half-life and lower systemic toxicity which is superior to conventional drug formulations (17–20).
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is one of medicinal synthetic polymer injections which can be used for the body as approved by FDA. There are numerous advantages of PEG drugs such as: i) extending biologic half-life of drugs, enhancing long-acting and sustained-release effect; ii) improving the solubility and stability of the drug; iii) reducing immunogenicity and antigenicity; iv) reducing enzyme degradation; v) enhancing the targeting function of drugs; and vi) reducing the toxicity of various drugs. Based on the above advantages, we chose PEG to formulate polymeric nanoparticles due to its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability.
Aiming to develop a good nanoparticle carrier for DTX, we synthesized PEG-DANPs via the emulsion-evaporation cross-link method, and we carried out a series of experiments both in vitro and in vivo, the results demonstrated that PEG-DANPs were quite a promising modality for NSCLC.
Materials and methods
Materials
All reagents and solvents were used as received, without further purification. Monomethoxy PEG with a molecular weight of 20,000 kDa (mPEG 20,000), D,L-lactide and stannous octoate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Corp. (Shanghai, China); DTX was purchased from Beijing Norzer Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China); free-DTX (Aisu®) is manufactured by Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu, China); and 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiazol(z-y1)-3,5-di-phenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was obtained from Amresco (Solon, OH, USA); Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit was purchased from 4A Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China); VivoGlo® luciferin was purchased from Promega Corporation (Madison, WI, USA). Trypsin, fetal bovine serum (FBS) and RPMI-1640 medium were purchased from HyClone (Logan, UT, USA), and culture flasks and dishes were from Corning (Corning, NY, USA).
Cell line and animals
Human non-small lung cancer A549 cell line was provided by the Department of Pathology in Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology in Peking Union Medical College. A549 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37°C. Female BALB/c mice (6–8-weeks old) were used for antitumor efficacy studies and were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratories (Beijing, China).
Animals were acclimatized in the holding facility prior to beginning of the present study. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. All surgeries were performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia (5 mg/ml solution), and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. Lung tumor and other sections were routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and evaluated under a light microscope.
Preparation of DANPs and PEG-DANPs
DTX was dissolved in chloroform and ethanol to form solution A, albumin was dissolved in sterile water to form solution B. The solution A and B was mixed and stirred by homogenate machine 5 min to form raw milk, the raw milk was moved into high pressure homogenizer, under the 20,000 psi for 12 cycles. The chloroform of mixture was eliminated using rotary evaporator for 25 min and followed by filtration through a 0.22 µm filter.
DANPs and mPEG (20,000 kDa) were added to the solution of boric acid buffer (0.1 mol/l, pH 9.0) according to the ratio of 3:1 with stirring and the reaction was terminated via adding glycine (1 mg/ml) 3 h later. Unbound HAS and PEG were removed by ultrafiltration (MWCO, 70 kDa) (21,22).
Determination via PAGE gel electrophoresis: DANPs and PEG-DANPs were determined via PAGE gel electrophoresis with iodine staining and Mas blue staining.
Cell viability
The in vitro cytotoxic activity of DANPs and PEG-DANPs was evaluated by the MTT assay. Briefly, the A549 cells (8×104 cells/ml) were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h to allow cell attachment. The cells were then treated with a series of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (control), Aisu®, DANPs and PEG-DANPs at 37°C (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 µg/ml). At the incubation-time points of 48 h, 20 µl of MTT (5 mg/ml) was added and incubated for 4 h, MTT was aspirated off and 180 µl/well of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to dissolve the formazan crystals, and the plate was gently shaken for 10 min. The optical density (OD) was measured at 490 nm by Synergy H1m monochromator-based multi-mode microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). The cell inhibition was calculated according to the below formula: Cell inhibition (%) = [1 − (ODsample − ODblank)/(ODsample − ODblank)] × 100%. The results were expressed as means ± SD of 3 measurements. No precipitation of DTX was found during incubation procedure (23).
Cell apoptosis assay
Apoptotic cells were determined by dual staining with an Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) kit (4A Biotech Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's instructions (24). After 48 h of incubation in the exponential stage, A549 cells seeded in 12-well plates were treated for a further 48 h with 10 nmol/ml Aisu®, DANPs and PEG-DANPs, respectively. After treatment, cells were washed twice with warm PBS, detached by trypsin without EDTA, then through the following steps: collection, centrifugation, washing with warm PBS, further staining with PI and Annexin V-FITC for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Apoptosis was then analyzed using a FACScan cytometer. Quadrant analysis was performed and cells that stained positive for both Annexin V-FITC and PI were designated as apoptotic, while unstained cells were designated as viable.
In vivo antitumor and metastasis inhibition
All experimental procedures were performed in conformity with institutional guidelines and protocols for the care and use of laboratory animals. We chose 40 BALB/c mice to divide into two parts, one part was to establish the transplantation tumor model (25,26) to observe the inhibition of drugs for transplantation tumor and weight changes of nude mice; the other part was to establish the in situ carcinoma model to observe the inhibition of drugs for in situ carcinoma and metastasis. Each group contained 20 mice and they were equally divided into four groups, respectively, negative control (glucose injection group), positive control (Aisu® group), DANPs and PEG-DANPs groups with 5 animals each. The lung cancer A549 cells were suspended in BD Matrigel, and the mice in each group were implanted with 3×106 cells in alar or in the lung. When the tumor volume in transplantation tumor group reached ~120 mm3, the mice were treated 4 times at 7-day intervals with 5% glucose injection (negative control), with Aisu®, DANPs or PEG-DANPs at the same time in both parts, respectively. All formulations were injected intravenously via the tail vein at a DTX dose of 20 mg/kg. The body weight and tumor volume were measured simultaneously. Tumor volume was calculated using the equation of V = w2 × l/2. Here, w and l are the width and length of the tumor. Forty-eight hours after the last treatment, the mice were sacrificed. The tumors with lung and other major organs (including heart, liver, spleen and kidney) were removed, fixed in 10% formalin solution, and subjected to paraffin embedding for H&E staining.
Survival rate of the nude mice after treatment
Additional 32 nude mice were used to establish the transplantation tumor model and divided into negative control group (group glucose injection), positive control group (Aisu®), DANPs and PEG-DANPs group, the mice were treated until natural death, observe and the survival rate was drawn.
Statistical analysis
Results are presented as means ± SD. Statistical comparisons were carried out by t-test or ANOVA analysis. The level of significance was set at p<0.05.
Results
Determination of DANPs and PEG-DANPs via PAGE gel electrophoresis
The PAGE gel electrophoresis displayed PEG-DANPs existing in two bands, PEG and protein, respectively; whereas there was only one band in DANPs, which represents the protein (Fig. 1).
Cell viability
Fig. 2 shows the result of the cytotoxicity of Aisu®, DANPs and PEG-DANPs against A549 lung cancer cells. A549 cells were exposed to a series of equivalent concentrations of Aisu®, DANPs and PEG-DANPs for 48 h, and the inhibition rates were determined via the MTT method. The cell survival rate had a dose-dependent inverse relationship with the drug concentrations. PEG-DANPs accelerated cellular uptake of the drug and induced higher cytotoxicity in cancer cells than Aisu® and DANPs, particularly at lower DTX concentrations (0.001–0.1 µg/ml). However, A549 cells were more sensitive to Aisu® than DANPs and PEG-DANPs at higher concentrations (1–100 µg/ml). Nanoparticles are internalized into cancer cells via endocytic mechanisms (27), while the free-drug diffuses into cells according to the concentration gradient between the intracellular and extracellular environments. It is why Aisu® is more cytotoxic at higher concentrations.
PEG-DANPs increase DTX-induced apoptosis in A549 cells
DTX was described as an antimitotic agent which could bind to β-tubulin, resulting in blocking the cell cycle at the G2/M phase and apoptosis of cells (28,29). According to a previous study, encapsulation of DTX in nanoparticles could increase apoptosis of prostate cancer cells (30). Given that PEG-DTX-HANPs demonstrated stronger in vitro cytotoxicity than DANPs and Aisu®, we performed apoptosis assays using Annexin V-FITC and PI staining to compare apoptosis induction. As predicted, PEG-DANPs (55.65%) increased late apoptosis in A549 cells compared with DANPs and Aisu® (25.85 and 43.00%) (Fig. 3).
Anticancer and metastasis inhibition of PEG-DANPs in vivo
Tumor-bearing nude mice were injected with Aisu®, DANPs and PEG-DANPs, and their therapeutic effects were examined by measuring the suppression of body weight and tumor growth. The body weight of the mice in the negative control groups was basically unchanged or slightly increased, while the mice in the drug groups all lost weight in the process of the treatment. However, the reduction range in the Aisu® group was more significant than the other two groups (p<0.01) (Fig. 4), suggesting severe systemic toxicity in addition to tumor toxicity. It was found that all the tumor volumes treated with Aisu®, DANPs and PEG-DANPs were much smaller than those of negative control groups treated with the same dose (p<0.05), and the tumors of PEG-DANPs groups were obviously smaller than those of Aisu® groups (Fig. 5A and B), indicating that PEG-DANPs is the most effective to inhibit tumor growth among the three.
A typical tumor cellular morphology was seen under the microscope in the negative control groups both in transplant model and in situ. Regardless of the tissue, tumor or lung, we could see that the tumor cells were of different sizes with abundant deep blue stained nuclei, and the nuclear division was significant. There was also loss of polarity, tightly packed cells with ill-defined nuclei and visible focal degeneration or necrosis of cancer cells. This showed that the model had been established successfully (Fig. 6A and B). In the PEG-DANPs groups, the number of cancer cells was significantly reduced, the color of nuclei was stained red rather than light blue in DANPs and Aisu® group, and large necrotic areas could be seen without any nuclear division.
Extensive metastases were found in the livers of control group mice, and there were large tumor nests, we could also see liver metastases both in Aisu® and DANPs-treated mice which were significant smaller than the control groups. In contrast, liver tissue from PEG-DANP-treated mice showed barely measurable levels of tumor cells but only few neutrophils infiltrated by tumor cells (Fig. 7), these results suggest that PEG-DANPs could suppress metastases in other organs such as liver more effectively than DANPs and Aisu®.
Survival rate of the nude mice after treatment
Nude mice in control group were all dead on the 36th day, and the mice in PEG-DANPs group were dead on the 56th day. Fig. 8 shows that the mice which were treated with PEG-DANPs survived longer than the other groups, and the differences are significant.
Discussion
According to the results of our previous experiments (31), we demonstrated that PEG-DANPs presented a more sustained manner of release in vitro, this is since DTX is encapsulated in the core portion, it has to go through the process of diffusion before release which leads to the delayed effect. Furthermore, PEG-DANPs are superior to DANPs in vitro drug release due to the PEG on the surface of the nanoparticles. Moreover, PEG-DANPs could be also used as a platform for the incorporation of active targeting moiety (28). PEG-DANPs could not only minimize the exposure of normal tissues but also increase the accumulation of the therapeutic drug in the tumor site compared to Aisu® (32), thus showing its potential applicability as a drug delivery system.
The PEG chain of PEG-DANPs is hydrophilic, it is currently thought to act as a protector to achieve long circulation time of drugs in the blood. It accumulated in the liver, spleen and lung, and finally was released from these organs to blood circulation according to the drug concentration gradient (29), which resulted in a sustained blood level compared to Aisu® and DANPs. From the above results, we can make a conclusion that PEG-DANPs can not only increase the concentration and uptake of antitumor drugs in the tumors, but also prolong the time that drugs are sustained in the blood (33,34), which are the main approaches to increase antitumor activity and inhibit tumor growth in chemotherapy.
PEG-DANPs with an appropriate particle size can significantly accumulate in the tumor via the EPR effect, this is called size-dependent passive targeting. The size of PEG-DANPs is ~169 nm (31), it can preferentially accumulate and stay in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues. Moreover, the higher DTX concentration in blood of the PEG-DANPs group could lead to delay tumor development significantly better than the other two drugs both in transplant model and in situ. In Fig. 4, the body weight changes in the tested mouse groups are shown. The body weight loss of the mice in Aisu® groups was more significant than the DANPs and PEG-DANPs groups, particularly the PEG-DANPs group. These results show that PEG-DANPs has less toxicity to normal organs and less systemic toxicity so that it can provide longer survival time.
Collectively, our experiments were reported on the PEG-DANPs against NSCLC in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro cytotoxicity study proved the dose- and time-dependent manner against A549 lung cancer cells; the in vivo PEG-DANPs had superior antitumor and metastasis effects compared to DANPs and Aisu®, and also relatively lower side-effects providing longer survival time. PEG-DANPs exerted promising therapeutic effects on NSCLC, and it is a good drug-delivery platform for the treatment of NSCLC.
References
Gridelli C, Maione P, Comunale D and Rossi A: Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Control. 14:57–62. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu SH: Effect of docetaxel with cisplatin in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Hainan Med Coll. 16:1615–1617. 2010.In Chinese. | |
Li XT: Docetaxel and cisplatin treatment of non-small cell lung cancer analysis. Chin J Mod Drug Appl. 4:34–35. 2010. | |
Lu XM and Mao GX: A study of docetaxel plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Basic Clin Oncol. 22:308–310. 2009. | |
Xu Y: Docetaxel combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chin J Mod Drug Applic. 4:26–28. 2010. | |
Shao JH: Efficacy of docetaxel combined with nedaplatin or cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chin J N Drugs. 19:599–601. 2010. | |
Zhang CH, Ren ZH, Li M, et al: Cisplatin plus docetaxel combination in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chin J Clin Oncol Rehab. 17:54–56. 2010. | |
Stinchcombe TE and Socinski MA: Considerations for second-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 13(Suppl 1): S28–S36. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Xu YZ and Xu LW: The exploration of 70 years of age or older chemotherapy against non-small cell lung cancer cells. Zhejiang Clin Med. 9:1226–1227. 2007.In Chinese. | |
Li JJ: A study of cisplatin plus docetaxel or gemcitabine in treating advanced non small cell lung cancer. Mod Med. 18:54–55. 582011. | |
Xiong Y, Zhou TC, Liu Y, Wang ZW, Lin XL, Song XL, Shi XY and Liao ZW: Clinical analysis of efficacy in docetaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy with 3-DCRT treating the patients with locally advanced NSCLC. China J Cancer Prev Treat. 17:699–702. 2010. | |
Greco FA, Spigel DR, Burris HA III, Shipley DL, Farley C, Gandhi J, Houston GA and Hainsworth JD: Weekly docetaxel versus docetaxel/gemcitabine in elderly/poor performance status (PS) patients (pts) with stage III B/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Randomized phase III trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. J Clin Oncol. 25(Suppl): S75342007. | |
Kudoh S, Takeda K, Nakagawa K, Takada M, Katakami N, Matsui K, Shinkai T, Sawa T, Goto I, Semba H, et al: Randomized phase study of docetaxel versus vinorelbine for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results of a west Japan thoracic oncology group trial (WJTOG 9904). J Clin Oncol. 24:3657–3663. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Q, Li R, Zhu Z, Qian X, Guan W, Yu L, Yang M, Jiang X and Liu B: Enhanced antitumor efficacy, biodistribution and penetration of docetaxel-loaded biodegradable nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 430:350–358. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ghosh SC, Neslihan Alpay S and Klostergaard J: CD44: A validated target for improved delivery of cancer therapeutics. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 16:635–650. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gao W, Xiang B, Meng TT, Liu F and Qi XR: Chemotherapeutic drug delivery to cancer cells using a combination of folate targeting and tumor microenvironment-sensitive polypeptides. Biomaterials. 34:4137–4149. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang F, Zhang D, Zhang Q, Chen Y, Zheng D, Hao L, Duan C, Jia L, Liu G and Liu Y: Synergistic effect of folate-mediated targeting and verapamil-mediated P-gp inhibition with paclitaxel-polymer micelles to overcome multi-drug resistance. Biomaterials. 32:9444–9456. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ganesh S, Iyer AK, Gattacceca F, Morrissey DV and Amiji MM: In vivo biodistribution of siRNA and cisplatin administered using CD44-targeted hyaluronic acid nanoparticles. J Control Release. 172:699–706. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Iyer AK, Greish K, Seki T, Okazaki S, Fang J, Takeshita K and Maeda H: Polymeric micelles of zinc protoporphyrin for tumor targeted delivery based on EPR effect and singlet oxygen generation. J Drug Target. 15:496–506. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fang J, Nakamura H and Maeda H: The EPR effect: Unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 63:136–151. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tang N, Du G, Wang N, Liu C, Hang H and Liang W: Improving penetration in tumors with nanoassemblies of phospholipids and doxorubicin. J Natl Cancer Inst. 99:1004–1015. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li RY: Docetaxel-loaded PEG-albumin nanoparticles for anti-metastasis in murine 4T1 breast cancer. Yanbian University PhD Thesis. 2012 | |
Li JQ, Yang ZZ, Meng TT and Qi XR: The use of cationic liposomes to co-deliver docetaxel and siRNA for targeted therapy of hepatocelluar carcinoma. J Chin Pharm Sci. 23:667–673. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Li Y, Jin M, Shao S, Huang W, Yang F, Chen W, Zhang S, Xia G and Gao Z: Small-sized polymeric micelles incorporating docetaxel suppress distant metastases in the clinically-relevant 4T1 mouse breast cancer model. BMC Cancer. 14:329–344. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim D, Gao ZG, Lee ES and Bae YH: In vivo evaluation of doxorubicin-loaded polymeric micelles targeting folate receptors and early endosomal pH in drug-resistant ovarian cancer. Mol Pharm. 6:1353–1362. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gao ZG, Fain HD and Rapoport N: Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by micellar-encapsulated drug and ultrasound. J Control Release. 102:203–222. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xiao L, Xiong X, Sun X, Zhu Y, Yang H, Chen H, Gan L, Xu H and Yang X: Role of cellular uptake in the reversal of multidrug resistance by PEG-b-PLA polymeric micelles. Biomaterials. 32:5148–5157. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen W, Zhan C, Gu B, Meng Q, Wang H, Lu W and Hou H: Targeted brain delivery of itraconazole via RVG29 anchored nanoparticles. J Drug Target. 19:228–234. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mu L, Teo MM, Ning HZ, Tan CS and Feng SS: Novel powder formulations for controlled delivery of poorly soluble anticancer drug: Application and investigation of TPGS and PEG in spray-dried particulate system. J Control Release. 103:565–575. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li X, Li R, Qian X, Ding Y, Tu Y, Guo R, Hu Y, Jiang X, Guo W and Liu B: Superior antitumor efficiency of cisplatin-loaded nanoparticles by intratumoral delivery with decreased tumor metabolism rate. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 70:726–734. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin G, Jin M, Yin X, Jin Z, Chen L and Gao Z: A comparative study on the effect of docetaxel-albumin nanoparticles and docetaxel-loaded PEG-albumin nanoparticles against non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Oncol. 47:1945–1953. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gong C, Xie Y, Wu Q, Wang Y, Deng S, Xiong D, Liu L, Xiang M, Qian Z and Wei Y: Improving anti-tumor activity with polymeric micelles entrapping paclitaxel in pulmonary carcinoma. Nanoscale. 4:6004–6017. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang F, Zhang D, Zhang Q, Guo S, Zheng D, Hao L, Guo H and Li C: Tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics evaluation of DOMC-FA micelles for intravenous delivery of PTX. J Drug Target. 21:137–145. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang J, Huo MR and Zhang XY: Progress in hyaluronic acidbased targeted nano-drug delivery systems. Chin J Pharm. 44:828–835. 2013. |