Inhibition of human colorectal cancer metastasis by notoginsenoside R1, an important compound from Panax notoginseng

  • Authors:
    • Chang-Yin Lee
    • Shu-Ling Hsieh
    • Shuchen Hsieh
    • Chin-Chung Tsai
    • Lan-Chi Hsieh
    • Yu-Hao Kuo
    • Chih-Chung Wu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 7, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.5222
  • Pages: 399-407
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Panax notoginseng (P. notoginseng) and its components are used as traditional Chinese medicine for cardiovascular disease, although studies concerning the anti-metastatic properties of these compounds are limited. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of notoginsenoside R1 (NGR1), an important compound derived from P. notoginseng, on the metastasis of human colorectal cancer (CRC). The migratory, invasive, and adhesive abilities of cultured human CRC cells (HCT-116) treated with NGR1 and expression of metastasis‑associated regulatory molecules were assessed. The migratory and invasive abilities of the HCT-116 cells were reduced after treatment with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 24 h. When HCT-116 cells were incubated with 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 24 h, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 expression was reduced compared with that of the control group. In the adhesion reaction assays, treatment with 150 or 300 µM NGR1 led to significantly decreased adhesion of the HCT-116 cells to endothelial cells (EA.hy926 cells). Levels of integrin-1 protein were significantly decreased in the HCT-116 cells following treatment with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1, and levels of E-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) proteins were significantly decreased in the EA.hy926 cells treated with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1. Scanning electron microscopy examination indicated that HCT-116 cells treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) combined with 300 µM NGR1 exhibited a less flattened and retracted shape compared with cells treated with LPS alone, and this change in shape is characteristic of extravasation. Additionally, the transepithelial electrical resistance of the EA.hy926 endothelial cell monolayer increased after incubation with 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 24 h. Overall, these results demonstrated the anti-metastatic properties of 150 or 300 µM NGR1, a compound that affects CRC metastasis by inhibiting cell migration, invasion, and adhesion and by regulating expression of metastasis-associated signalling molecules.

Introduction

Human colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers and lethal malignancies in both Taiwan and worldwide. Approximately 1.4 million new cases of CRC are diagnosed annually, and approximately half of all CRC patients will develop metastatic cancer (1). Indeed, the major cause of death among CRC patients is metastasis (2). Thus, research concerning anti-metastatic agents is important for cancer prevention and therapy.

During metastasis, multistage progression and a series of regulatory events occur, with involvement of specific regulatory molecules. Major metastatic processes include migration and invasion, intravasation, circulation and adhesion, extravasation, and colonization (3). In the early stage of metastasis, migration and intravasation occur when the structure responsible for cell-cell contact, i.e., the extracellular matrix (ECM), is degraded by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (4). After migration and intravasation, cancer cells leave the original tumor organ and enter the circulation. For extravasation to a metastatic organ, circulating cancer cells first need to adhere to endothelial cells, and adhesion molecules [e.g., integrin-1 in tumor cells and E-selectin and intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) in endothelium cells] play a key role in regulating adhesion of tumor cells to endothelial cells (5,6). Thus, inhibition of cancer cell migration, invasion and adhesion and/or regulators of expression may be an effective strategy for suppressing CRC metastasis.

The root of Panax notoginseng (P. notoginseng) is used as a traditional Chinese medicine and functional food. Previous studies have shown that P. notoginseng suppressed liver metastasis when B16 melanoma cells were transplanted into the spleen of C57BL/6 mice (7). In addition, 20(S)-25-methoxyldammarane-3b, 12b, 20-triol (25-OCH3-PPD), a ginsenoside from P. notoginseng, was active against the proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells via downregulation of mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) (8). Recently, we demonstrated that a P. notoginseng ethanol extract exerted a suppressive effect on metastasis by inhibiting migration, invasion and adhesion through alterations in the expression of associated regulatory molecules (9). P. notoginseng contains additional active ingredients, mainly consisting of dammarane-type saponins (10). The total saponin content of P. notoginseng is ~12%, with notoginsenoside, ginseng saponin and gynostemma glycosides being the three major types (10). Notoginsenoside R1 (NGR1), a unique major saponin of P. notoginseng, has been shown to effectively prevent cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, neurotoxicity and osteoporosis (1114). Regarding cancer, some studies have demonstrated that NGR1 is beneficial for the prevention and treatment of colon cancer and leukaemia (1517). However, the effects of NGR1 on CRC metastasis and the related regulatory mechanisms remain unclear.

The aims of this study were to investigate the possible anti-metastatic effects of NGR1 and to identify whether these effects are involved in regulating human CRC cell migration, invasion or adhesion. Wound healing and invasion assays and MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression analyses were performed using HCT-116 cells treated with NGR1. In addition, the effects of NGR1 on the adhesion of HCT-116 cells to EA.hy926 human endothelial cells were investigated, and the expression levels of integrin-1, E-selectin and ICAM-1 in EA.hy926 human endothelial cells were examined. To determine the effects of NGR1 on intravasation and extravasation, the cell shape and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of EA.hy926 cells were evaluated. The results of this study will help to elucidate the effects of NGR1 on migration, invasion and adhesion of human CRC cells via regulation of metastasis-associated molecules.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Notoginsenoside R1 (NGR1) (3β,6α,12β)-20-(β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-3,12-dihydroxydammar-24-en-6-yl 2-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-β-D-glucopyranoside) was purchased from Tianjin Zhongxin Pharmaceutical Co. (Tianjin, China). Antisera against integrin-1, E-selectin and ICAM-1 were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Antisera against MMP-2 and MMP-9 were obtained from GeneTex, Inc. (Hsinchu, Taiwan). In addition, 2′,7′-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5- (and-6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) was purchased from Life Technologies GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Cell cultures and treatment

The human CRC cell line HCT-116 was used as a model for CRC intravasation, migration and adhesion (18), and the human umbilical vein endothelial cell line EA.hy926 was used as an extravasation model for cancer cell adhesion to endothelial cells (19). HCT-116 and EA.hy926 cells were purchased from Bioresource Collection and Research Center (Hsinchu, Taiwan) and cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

For various biochemical analyses, the cells were plated and incubated for 24 h before treatment with 75, 150, 300 or 500 µM NGR1 for the indicated times. NGR1 was diluted in ethanol, and cells treated with ethanol alone served as the control group.

Cell viability analysis

Cell viability was evaluated using the 3-(4,5-dimethyazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction assay as described by Denizot and Lang (20). HCT-116 cells were incubated in 3-cm plates (1×106 cells) for 24 h and treated with 75, 150, 300, or 500 µM NGR1 for 12, 24 or 48 h. MTT (5 mg/ml) was then added, and the optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm.

Wound healing assay

To determine whether the migration of HCT-116 cells was suppressed by NGR1, a monolayer wound healing assay was conducted. The protocol for the wound healing assay was a modified version of that described by Ang et al (21). HCT-116 cells were cultured in 3-cm plates (1×106 cells) for 24 h, and a micropipette tip was then used to make a uniform scratch in the center of the monolayer. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1 was added for 0, 12, 24, or 48 h. HCT-116 cell morphology was subsequently observed under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX51 microscope; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and the width of the wound area was measured using ImageJ software to determine the cell migration distance (22).

Invasion assay

An invasion assay was performed to assess intravasation and extravasation abilities. Matrigel solution (50 µl) was added to the wells of a 24-well Transwell plate, which was then incubated at 37°C for 30 min. In the upper chamber, HCT-116 cells were resuspended in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium (5×104 cells/3-cm plate) in the absence or presence of NGR1 (75, 150 or 300 µM). RPMI-1640 medium (500 µl) containing 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After incubation for 24 h, the invading cells that migrated to the lower surface of the filter membrane were stained with 0.2% crystal violet for 15 min. The number of invading cells on the lower surface of the membrane was determined under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX51; Olympus) using NIH ImageJ software (22).

Adhesion assay

The adhesion assay protocol used was a modification of that described by Braut-Boucher et al (23). EA.hy926 cells (1×106 cells) were cultured in 3-cm plates and exposed to 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 6 h. The cells were then washed with PBS and co-cultured for 1 h with HCT-116 cells labelled with 10 µM BCECF. After washing with PBS, the morphology of the BCECF-stained HCT-116 cells was evaluated under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX51; Olympus). The BCECF-stained cells were collected and measured fluorometrically using an ELISA reader at an OD of 580 nm.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination

SEM was used to examine morphological changes in cell shape and to examine protruding surface structures (24). HCT-116 cells were treated with 1 µg/ml LPS, an invasion inducer (25), or 300 µM NGR1 combined with 1 µg/ml LPS for 24 h. The cells were then collected, washed with PBS, and fixed for 30 min in 10% glutaraldehyde solution (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA; 25%). Dehydration was achieved in a graded ethanol series (2×15 min in 50 vol% ethanol, 2×15 min in 70 vol% ethanol, 2×15 min in 80 vol% ethanol, 2×15 min in 90 vol% ethanol, 2×20 min, and 60 min overnight in absolute ethanol). After dehydration, the cells were prepared on gold substrates and platinum-coated conductive substrates (JEOL JFC-1600; Jeol, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). SEM images were obtained using a JEOL JSM-7000F SEM microscope at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.

Measurement of TEER

TEER is a quantitative measurement of the barrier integrity of a monolayer that is used to examine cell-cell integrity and permeability (26). For TEER measurements, EA.hy926 cells (5×104 cells/well) were cultured for 24 h in RPMI-1640 medium containing 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1. TEER values were obtained by subtracting the TEER measurement for the cell culture dish groove from the measurement obtained in the presence of a cell layer. These measurements were collected using a Millicell-ERS voltohmmeter (Millipore-Continental Water Systems, Bedford, MA, USA).

Analysis of expression of regulatory proteins involved in migration, adhesion and invasion

Approximately 5×105 HCT-116 cells/3-cm plate were used for MMP-2, MMP-9, and integrin-1 expression analyses; 5×105 EA.hy926 cells/3-cm plate were used for E-selectin and ICAM-1 expression analyses. The cells were incubated in a 12-well plate with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 24 h, washed twice in cold PBS and harvested using 200 µl of lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 20 µg/ml aprotinin at pH 7.4. The levels of cellular protein were determined following the method described by Lowry et al (27).

For each sample, 10–20 mg of cellular protein was applied to 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) polyacrylamide gels (28). After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (29). The membranes were then incubated with an anti-MMP-2, anti-MMP-9, anti-integrin-1, anti-E-selectin or anti-ICAM-1 antibody at 37°C for 1 h and subsequently with a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Bands were visualized using hydrogen peroxide/tetrahydrochloride diaminobenzidine or an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Life Science, Buckinghamshire, UK) and quantified using an AlphaImager 2000 (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using the statistical analysis software SPSS for Windows, version 20.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncans multiple range tests were employed to evaluate the significance of differences between two mean values. A P-value of <0.05 or 0.01 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.

Results

NGR1 suppresses the viability of human CRC cells

According to the MTT assay results, HCT-116 cell viability after treatment with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1 did not differ significantly from that of the control during the 48-h incubation period (data not shown). However, the viability of cells treated with 500 µM NGR1 for 48 h was significantly reduced (58±7.26%) compared with the control cells (100%) (p<0.05). Therefore, we used an NGR1 concentration of 75, 150 or 300 µM for all subsequent experiments.

NGR1 inhibits the migratory and invasive abilities of human CRC cells. The effects of NGR1 on the migratory abilities are presented in Fig. 1. When HCT-116 cells were incubated with various concentrations of NGR1 for 12, 24 or 48 h, the wound healing areas varied as shown in Fig. 1A. The results showed that the HCT-116 cells treated with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 24 or 48 h exhibited reduced wound closure rates compared with the control group (17–21 and 24–34%, respectively) (Fig. 1B). These results indicate that NGR1 significantly suppressed HCT-116 cell migration. The results of the Transwell Matrigel invasion assay indicated that when HCT-116 cells were incubated in various concentrations of NGR1 for 24 h (Fig. 1C), the level of HCT-116 cell invasion was significantly decreased by 64±8, 61±14 or 51±19% after treatment with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 24 h, respectively, compared with the control group (100%) (p<0.01) (Fig. 1D). This result suggests that NGR1 inhibits the inter-colon migratory and invasive abilities of colon cancer cells.

The effects of NGR1 on the levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 are presented in Fig. 2. Immunoblotting assays showing the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in HCT-116 cells after NGR1 treatment are presented in Fig. 2A. NGR1 did not regulate MMP-2 expression in the HCT-116 cells (Fig. 2B). However, when HCT-116 cells were treated with 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 24 h, the MMP-9 protein expression was significantly decreased by 35 and 68%, respectively, compared with the control group (100%) (p<0.01) (Fig. 2C). These results indicate that NGR1 regulates migration and intravasation by regulating MMP-9 expression.

NGR1 reduces adhesion of human CRC cells

Fluorescence microscopic examination revealed that treatment of EA.hy926 cells with various concentrations of NGR1 decreased the number of adherent cells detected after co-culture with the HCT-116 cells (Fig. 3A). After EA.hy926 cells were incubated with 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 24 h (Fig. 3B), cell adhesion was significantly decreased by 18 to 20% in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, the adhesion levels of these cells were significantly reduced compared with that of the control group (100%) (p<0.01) after 24 h. These results demonstrated that NGR1 decreased the ability of HCT-116 cells to adhere to EA.hy926 cells and may be able to reduce cancer cell adhesion to a metastasis target organ.

The protein levels of integrin-1 in HCT-116 cells, and E-selectin and ICAM-1 in the EA.hy926 cells were analysed (Fig. 4). The expression levels of integrin-1, E-selectin and ICAM-1 are presented in Fig. 4A. Treatment of HCT-116 cells with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 24 h significantly decreased integrin-1 protein levels by 10 to 27% compared with the control group (100%) (Fig. 4B). As shown in Fig. 4C, after treatment with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1 for 24 h, the levels of E-selectin protein in the EA.hy926 cells were 85±5, 78±7 and 78±4%, respectively, compared with the control values (100%); and these values were significantly lower than levels in the control group (p<0.01). The levels of ICAM-1 protein in cells incubated with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1 were significantly reduced (86±3, 68±3 and 34±2%, respectively) (Fig. 4D) compared with these levels in control cells (100%). These results indicate that expression of these adhesion molecules was suppressed by NGR1 and NGR1 may exert an important anti-adhesion effect during metastasis.

NGR1 inhibits extravasation of human CRC cells

To investigate the effects of NGR1 on extravasation, changes in HCT-116 cell shape were examined using SEM technology. The LPS-treated HCT-116 cells exhibited a flattened and partially collapsed shape compared with the shape of the control cells, whereas HCT-116 cells treated with LPS combined with 300 µM NGR1 exhibited a less flattened shape compared with the cells treated with LPS alone (Fig. 5A). The effect of NGR1 on the TEER of EA.hy926 cells was also examined. After treatment with 75, 150 or 300 µM NGR1, the TEER values were 113±3, 128±14 and 134±16%, respectively (Fig. 5B), representing significant increases compared with the control group (100%) (p<0.05). This result shows that NGR1 may increase inter-epithelial cell TEER, thereby decreasing cell permeability and inhibiting the invasive ability of endothelial cells.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that notoginsenoside R1 (NGR1), an important component of P. notoginseng, significantly inhibited HCT-116 cell metastasis by suppressing migration, invasion and adhesion through regulation of MMP-9, integrin-1, E-selectin and ICAM-1 expression. In addition, our previous findings indicated that a P. notoginseng ethanol extract significantly suppressed metastasis of CRC (9). We conclude that NGR1 may be an important component of P. notoginseng, exerting an anti-metastasis effect. This finding is important in regard to the use of P. notoginseng and NGR1 as anti-metastatic agents, as 40 to 70% of colon cancers metastasize to the liver, and the prognosis is quite poor once metastasis has occurred (2). Indeed, anti-metastasis has become an important field of study for cancer prevention and therapy, as have investigations of the use of P. notoginseng or other active principle components.

P. notoginseng contains ~12% total saponins. The three major types of saponins are ginsenosides (e.g., Rb1, Rg1, Rg3), notoginsenosides (e.g., R1, R2, R3) and jiaogulan glucosides (e.g., RVI) (3033). The structures of both notoginsenosides and ginsenosides exhibit a tetracyclic gonane steroid core. Gonane, the simplest steroid, and its metabolites typically act as signaling molecules that are associated with various physiological effects (31). These saponins are also active principle components of P. notoginseng, and NGR1 is the most abundant of the notoginsenosides (33). Previous anticancer studies have indicated that NGR1 suppresses human colon cancer cell proliferation (16,17,34). However, we are the first to report that NGR1 significantly suppressed CRC metastasis. Among saponins with a gonane structure, ginsenoside Rb1 was found to exhibit anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic effects by suppressing the formation of endothelial tube-like structures on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (35). Ginsenoside Rg1 also suppressed transforming growth factor β1 (TGF β1)-induced invasion and migration in HepG2 liver cancer cells (36). In addition, by inhibiting MMP-13 expression, ginsenoside Rg3 significantly suppressed the migration, invasion, wound healing, and colony-forming abilities of B16F10 cells in a dose-dependent manner (37), and by inhibiting wound healing and MMP-9 expression via suppression of NF-κB phosphorylation and DNA binding activity, ginsenoside Rg1 suppressed phorbol myristate acetate-induced invasion and migration in MCF-7 breast cancer cells (38). The above studies indicate that saponins can reduce the activities of MMPs to inhibit cancer metastasis.

MMPs can degrade collagen in the ECM and basement membrane components such as collagen type IV, elastin and fibronectin (39). MMP-2 and MMP-9 are major gelatinases that catalyse degradation of type IV collagen (39). Our previous study showed that a P. notoginseng ethanol extract inhibited HCT-116 cell migration by significantly decreasing MMP-9 but had no effect on MMP-2 expression (9). Ginsenoside Rg1 also suppressed PMA-induced MMP-9 expression but did not affect MMP-2 expression (38). In the present study, NGR1 was found to regulate MMP-9 expression in the HCT-116 cells. Levi et al demonstrated that MMP-2 and MMP-9 have different specificities for growth factor receptors in metastatic regulation (40). Nonetheless, the MMP signalling mechanism of NGR1 requires further study.

In the present study, NGR1 suppressed adhesion of a colon cancer cell line to an endothelial cell line of the blood vasculature of metastatic target organs by inhibiting integrin-1 levels in HCT-116 cells and reducing E-selectin and ICAM-1 levels in EA.hy926 cells. This important finding indicates the potential anti-metastatic effect of P. notoginseng and its active principle components. During the metastatic process, cancer cells leave the primary tumor site and enter the blood or lymphatic circulation via migration and intravasation. These circulating tumor cells migrate along the endothelial cell surface and invade metastatic target organs, which is referred to as adhesion and extravasation (41,42). Once the adhesion reaction is triggered, various adhesion molecules, such as integrin-1, E-selectin and ICAM-1, play key roles in regulating the adhesion of circulating tumor cells to endothelial cells (43,44). A previous study indicated that tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) induced ICAM-1 expression in human A549 alveolar epithelial cells and adhesion of U937 cells to these cells reduced their metastatic ability (45). Bisdemethoxycurcumin, a major active compound of curcuminoids, significantly inhibited the adhesion, migration, invasion and metastasis of SKOV-3 cells by inhibiting MMP-9 and ICAM-1 expression (46). Among these adhesion-regulating molecules, integrins, a major class of cancer cell surface receptors of primary cancer cells, were responsible for the adhesion of cells to ECM proteins (47), and as demonstrated previously, E-selectin-mediated adhesion of tumor cells to the vascular endothelium is crucial for extravasation and metastasis (48). ICAM-1 plays a central role in cell-cell contacts, and cells overexpressing ICAM-1 may become targets for T cell infiltration. Indeed, ICAM-1 can enhance immune cell adhesion and migration (49). These integrins mediate strong adhesion between cancer cells and endothelial cells (50), and this process promotes the transmigration of cancer cells through the endothelium to metastatic sites (51,52). Our previous study showed that P. notoginseng exerts anti-metastasis effects in HCT-116 cells by decreasing adhesion activity through reduction in the levels of such adhesion molecules, including integrin-1, E-selectin and ICAM-1 (9). The suppressive effect of NGR1 on adhesion may be an important factor that contributes to the observed anti-migration effect.

In addition to their use in our analysis of the adhesion reaction, EA.hy926 cells were used in this study as a blood model to investigate the effects of NGR1 on extravasation in the vascular endothelial monolayer of the circulatory system. Extravasation is triggered when tumor cells adhere to endothelial cells and penetrate the endothelial cell layer. These metastatic cells bind to the monolayer cells, leading to disruption of endothelial cell-cell interactions and retraction of metastatic cells (5254). The results of SEM examination indicated that HCT-116 cells became flattened and retracted after LPS induction. However, this flattening was significantly reduced by treatment with both NGR1 and LPS. Monolayer endothelium cell-cell permeability and integrity also play important roles in regulating the extravasation of tumor cells to endothelial cells (5,6). The TEER value is used as an indicator of the integrity of cellular barriers before they are evaluated for the transport of organisms (e.g., cells, microorganisms), drugs or chemicals, and cell-cell permeability and barrier integrity are vital for the physiological activities of tissues (55). Thus, TEER is a widely accepted quantitative technique for measuring the integrity of endothelial and epithelial monolayers in cell culture models. Our results indicate that NGR1 inhibits HCT-116 cell extravasation. EA.hy926 cells treated with 150 or 300 µg/ml NGR1 exhibited significantly reduced monolayer endothelial cell permeability, resulting in the inhibition of extravasation.

As shown in Fig. 6, our results illustrate a model in which NGR1 suppresses CRC cell metastasis. NGR1 significantly suppresses migration-regulated molecules (e.g., MMP-9), reduces adhesion trigger molecules (e.g., integrin-1, E-selectin and ICAM-1), and increases cell-cell permeability, resulting in inhibition of HCT-116 migration, invasion and adhesion. Hence, NGR1 may serve as a potential anti-metastatic agent.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by E-Da Hospital (EDAHP103032) in Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

References

1 

Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 127:2893–2917. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 62:283–298. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Leber MF and Efferth T: Molecular principles of cancer invasion and metastasis (Review). Int J Oncol. 34:881–895. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Valastyan S and Weinberg RA: Tumor metastasis: Molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell. 147:275–292. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Okegawa T, Li Y, Pong RC and Hsieh JT: Cell adhesion proteins as tumor suppressors. J Urol. 167:1836–1843. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Yates CM, McGettrick HM, Nash GB and Rainger GE: Adhesion of tumor cells to matrices and endothelium. Methods Mol Biol. 1070:57–75. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Chen PF, Liu LM, Chen Z, Lin SY, Song WX and Xu YF: Effects of ethanol extracts of Panax notoginseng on liver metastasis of B16 melanoma grafted in mice. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 4:500–503. 2006.(In Chinese). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Wang W, Zhang X, Qin JJ, Voruganti S, Nag SA, Wang MH, Wang H and Zhang R: Natural product ginsenoside 25-OCH3-PPD inhibits breast cancer growth and metastasis through down-regulating MDM2. PLoS One. 7:e415862012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Hsieh SL, Hsieh S, Kuo YH, Wang JJ, Wang JC and Wu CC: Effects of Panax notoginseng on the metastasis of human colorectal cancer cells. Am J Chin Med. 44:851–870. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Yang X, Xiong X, Wang H and Wang J: Protective effects of Panax notoginseng saponins on cardiovascular diseases: A comprehensive overview of experimental studies. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014:2048402014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Jia C, Xiong M, Wang P, Cui J, Du X, Yang Q, Wang W, Chen Y and Zhang T: Notoginsenoside R1 attenuates atherosclerotic lesions in ApoE deficient mouse model. PLoS One. 9:e998492014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Yan S, Li Z, Li H, Arancio O and Zhang W: Notoginsenoside R1 increases neuronal excitability and ameliorates synaptic and memory dysfunction following amyloid elevation. Sci Rep. 4:63522014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Wang T, Wan D, Shao L, Dai J and Jiang C: Notoginsenoside R1 stimulates osteogenic function in primary osteoblasts via estrogen receptor signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 466:232–239. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Yu Y, Sun G, Luo Y, Wang M, Chen R, Zhang J, Ai Q, Xing N and Sun X: Cardioprotective effects of Notoginsenoside R1 against ischemia/reperfusion injuries by regulating oxidative stress- and endoplasmic reticulum stress-related signalingpathways. Sci Rep. 6:217302016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Xu L, Wang B and Gao J: Preliminary studies of notoginsenoside R1-induced differentiation of HL-60 cell lines in vitro. Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 22:124–127. 1991.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

16 

Wang CZ, Xie JT, Zhang B, Ni M, Fishbein A, Aung HH, Mehendale SR, Du W, He TC and Yuan CS: Chemopreventive effects of Panax notoginseng and its major constituents on SW480 human colorectal cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 31:1149–1156. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Wang CZ, Xie JT, Fishbein A, Aung HH, He H, Mehendale SR, He TC, Du W and Yuan CS: Antiproliferative effects of different plant parts of Panax notoginseng on SW480 human colorectal cancer cells. Phytother Res. 23:6–13. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Wang X, Wang Q, Ives KL and Evers BM: Curcumin inhibits neurotensin-mediated interleukin-8 production and migration of HCT116 human colon cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 12:5346–5355. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Zhang XM, Lv YG, Chen GB, Zou Y, Lin CW, Yang L, Guo P and Lin MP: Effect of mild hypothermia on breast cancer cells adhesion and migration. Biosci Trends. 6:313–324. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Denizot F and Lang R: Rapid colorimetric assay for cell growth and survival. Modifications to the tetrazolium dye procedure giving improved sensitivity and reliability. J Immunol Methods. 89:271–277. 1986.

21 

Ang SF, Zhao ZS, Lim L and Manser E: DAAM1 is a formin required for centrosome re-orientation during cell migration. PLoS One. 5:e130642010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Vincent C, Siddiqui TA and Schlichter LC: Podosomes in migrating microglia: components and matrix degradation. J Neuroinflammation. 9:1902012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Braut-Boucher F, Pichon J, Rat P, Adolphe M, Aubery M and Font J: A non-isotopic, highly sensitive, fluorimetric, cell-cell adhesion microplate assay using calcein AM-labeled lymphocytes. J Immunol Methods. 178:41–51. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Kung ML, Hsieh SL, Wu CC, Chu TH, Lin YC, Yeh BW and Hsieh S: Enhanced reactive oxygen species overexpression by CuO nanoparticles in poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Nanoscale. 7:1820–1829. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Harmey JH, Bucana CD, Lu W, Byrne AM, McDonnell S, Lynch C, Bouchier-Hayes D and Dong Z: Lipopolysaccharide-induced metastatic growth is associated with increased angiogenesis, vascular permeability and tumor cell invasion. Int J Cancer. 101:415–422. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Gopal PK, Prasad J, Smart J and Gill HS: In vitro adherence properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DR20 and Bifidobacterium lactis DR10 strains and their antagonistic activity against an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Int J Food Microbiol. 67:207–216. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL and Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 193:265–275. 1951.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Towbin H, Staehelin T and Gordon J: Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: Procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 76:4350–4354. 1979. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227:680–685. 1970. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Lau AJ, Woo SO and Koh HL: Analysis of saponins in raw and steamed Panax notoginseng using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. J Chromatogr A. 1011:77–87. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Yoshikawa M, Morikawa T, Kashima Y, Ninomiya K and Matsuda H: Structures of new dammarane-type triterpene saponins from the flower buds of Panax notoginseng and hepatoprotective effects of principal ginseng saponins. J Nat Prod. 66:922–927. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Li L, Zhang JL, Sheng YX, Guo DA, Wang Q and Guo HZ: Simultaneous quantification of six major active saponins of Panax notoginseng by high-performance liquid chromatography-UV method. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 38:45–51. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Sun S, Wang C, Tong R, Li X, Fishbein A, Wang Q, He T, Du W and Yuan C: Effects of steaming the root of Panax notoginseng on chemical composition and anticancer activities. Food Chem. 118:307–314. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

34 

He NW, Zhao Y, Guo L, Shang J and Yang XB: Antioxidant, antiproliferative, and pro-apoptotic activities of a saponin extract derived from the roots of Panax notoginseng (Burk.) F.H. Chen. J MedFood. 15:350–359. 2012.

35 

Leung KW, Cheung LW, Pon YL, Wong RN, Mak NK, Fan TP, Au SC, Tombran-Tink J and Wong AS: Ginsenoside Rb1 inhibits tube-like structure formation of endothelial cells by regulating pigment epithelium-derived factor through the oestrogen β receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 152:207–215. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Yu M, Yu X, Guo D, Yu B, Li L, Liao Q and Xing R: Ginsenoside Rg1 attenuates invasion and migration by inhibiting transforming growth factor-β1-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition in HepG2 cells. Mol Med Rep. 11:3167–3173. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

37 

Lee SG, Kang YJ and Nam JO: Anti-metastasis effects of Ginsenoside Rg3 in B16F10 cells. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 25:1997–2006. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Li L, Wang Y, Qi B, Yuan D, Dong S, Guo D, Zhang C and Yu M: Suppression of PMA-induced tumor cell invasion and migration by ginsenoside Rg1 via the inhibition of NF-κB-dependent MMP-9 expression. Oncol Rep. 32:1779–1786. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Woessner JF Jr: Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in connective tissue remodeling. FASEB J. 5:2145–2154. 1991.PubMed/NCBI

40 

Levi E, Fridman R, Miao HQ, Ma YS, Yayon A and Vlodavsky I: Matrix metalloproteinase 2 releases active soluble ectodomain of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:7069–7074. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Fidler IJ: Critical determinants of metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 12:89–96. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Jacobs PP and Sackstein R: CD44 and HCELL: Preventing hematogenous metastasis at step 1. FEBS Lett. 585:3148–3158. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Dimitroff CJ, Lechpammer M, Long-Woodward D and Kutok JL: Rolling of human bone-metastatic prostate tumor cells on human bone marrow endothelium under shear flow is mediated by E-selectin. Cancer Res. 64:5261–5269. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Kobayashi H, Boelte KC and Lin PC: Endothelial cell adhesion molecules and cancer progression. Curr Med Chem. 14:377–386. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Huang WC, Chan ST, Yang TL, Tzeng CC and Chen CC: Inhibition of ICAM-1 gene expression, monocyte adhesion and cancer cell invasion by targeting IKK complex: Molecular and functional study of novel α-methylene-γ-butyrolactone derivatives. Carcinogenesis. 25:1925–1934. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Pei H, Yang Y, Cui L, Yang J, Li X, Yang Y and Duan H: Bisdemethoxycurcumin inhibits ovarian cancer via reducing oxidative stress mediated MMPs expressions. Sci Rep. 6:287732016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Xiong J, Balcioglu HE and Danen EH: Integrin signaling in control of tumor growth and progression. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 45:1012–1015. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Köhler S, Ullrich S, Richter U and Schumacher U: E-/P-selectins and colon carcinoma metastasis: First in vivo evidence for their crucial role in a clinically relevant model of spontaneous metastasis formation in the lung. Br J Cancer. 102:602–609. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Zhu XW and Gong JP: Expression and role of ICAM-1 in the occurrence and development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 14:1579–1583. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Barthel SR, Hays DL, Yazawa EM, Opperman M, Walley KC, Nimrichter L, Burdick MM, Gillard BM, Moser MT, Pantel K, et al: Definition of molecular determinants of prostate cancer cell bone extravasation. Cancer Res. 73:942–952. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Sreeramkumar V, Leiva M, Stadtmann A, Pitava C, Ortega-Rodríguez I, Wild MK, Lee B, Zarbock A and Hidalgo A: Coordinated and unique functions of the E-selectin ligand ESL-1 during inflammatory and hematopoietic recruitment in mice. Blood. 122:3993–4001. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Wood S Jr: Pathogenesis of metastasis formation observed in vivo in the rabbit ear chamber. AMA Arch Pathol. 66:550–568. 1958.PubMed/NCBI

53 

Kramer RH and Nicolson GL: Interactions of tumor cells with vascular endothelial cell monolayers: A model for metastatic invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 76:5704–5708. 1979. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Kramer RH, Gonzalez R and Nicolson GL: Metastatic tumor cells adhere preferentially to the extracellular matrix underlying vascular endothelial cells. Int J Cancer. 26:639–645. 1980. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Srinivasan B, Kolli AR, Esch MB, Abaci HE, Shuler ML and Hickman JJ: TEER measurement techniques for in vitro barrier model systems. J Lab Autom. 20:107–126. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2017
Volume 37 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lee C, Hsieh S, Hsieh S, Tsai C, Hsieh L, Kuo Y and Wu C: Inhibition of human colorectal cancer metastasis by notoginsenoside R1, an important compound from Panax notoginseng. Oncol Rep 37: 399-407, 2017.
APA
Lee, C., Hsieh, S., Hsieh, S., Tsai, C., Hsieh, L., Kuo, Y., & Wu, C. (2017). Inhibition of human colorectal cancer metastasis by notoginsenoside R1, an important compound from Panax notoginseng. Oncology Reports, 37, 399-407. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.5222
MLA
Lee, C., Hsieh, S., Hsieh, S., Tsai, C., Hsieh, L., Kuo, Y., Wu, C."Inhibition of human colorectal cancer metastasis by notoginsenoside R1, an important compound from Panax notoginseng". Oncology Reports 37.1 (2017): 399-407.
Chicago
Lee, C., Hsieh, S., Hsieh, S., Tsai, C., Hsieh, L., Kuo, Y., Wu, C."Inhibition of human colorectal cancer metastasis by notoginsenoside R1, an important compound from Panax notoginseng". Oncology Reports 37, no. 1 (2017): 399-407. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.5222