Dendritic cell factor 1 inhibits proliferation and migration and induces apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells by inhibiting the ERK signaling pathway
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 16, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6796
- Pages: 103-112
-
Copyright: © Luo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer is the leading cause of death among children aged 1–14 years in the United States, and neuroblastoma (NB) accounts for 6% of those patients (1). NB is a common solid extracranial tumor in children that is diagnosed as a metastatic disease, most often metastasizing to the bone, bone marrow and lymph nodes (2,3) which destroys the bodys immune system. Despite the latest methods of chemotherapy and surgery, this type of tumor continues to make the prognosis very dismal for children presenting with advanced stages of the disease. Only 18–30% of patients with this type of cancer survive (4). Even worse, the mortality and recurrence rates of patients with high-risk (HR) NB is >60% (5), which is a heavy burden on both the patients and their families. An NB cell is a poorly differentiated type of cancer cell; therefore, it contains the functional and molecular characteristics of normal stem cells, which enables it to evade growth suppressors (6) that would increase patient survival. These characteristics provide NB with the ability to resist chemo- and radiotherapy treatments (7). In general, the overexpression of special cell-survival pathways and a deficiency in normal cell senescence or apoptosis control contribute to NB tumorigenesis and malignant transformation; therefore, the breakdown or hindrance in the connection to cell-survival pathways may decrease the potential for NB malignancy and provide several avenues to explore new NB therapies.
The Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK cascade pathway has been reported to play important roles in cancer cell growth and NB survival (8–10). Active mutations and/or overexpression of various components within this pathway (EGFR, Ras and Raf) are frequently observed in NB (11,12), especially in relapsing NB (13,14). As such, researchers have focused on the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in intense studies to identify new target-based approaches for cancer treatment to obtain more favorable results (15–17). Unfortunately, the disease in a majority of NB patients who receive treatment with Ras, Raf and MEK inhibitors becomes resistant after ~6–8 months and the drugs exhibit significantly reduced clinical efficacy. In view of this, the ERK1/2 pathway may be one of the best targets for NB treatment (17).
Previous studies have revealed that DCF1 plays a vital role in various cell processes, including regulation of neural stem-cell proliferation and differentiation (18,19), glioma cell apoptosis (20) and dendritic spine formation (21) and maintaining energy balance (22). Xie et al (23) demonstrated that DCF1 was significantly alerted among different grades of tumors and that DCF1 overexpression led to apoptosis by causing the cell mitochondria to dysfunction.
In the present study, we confirmed that the DCF1 inhibited cell viability and motility, promoted the apoptosis of Neuro-2a (N2a) and SK-N-SH cells, and identified the molecular mechanism by which DCF1 exerts tumor-suppressive effects on NB cells by inhibiting the ERK1/2 signaling pathway to promote apoptosis.
Materials and methods
All experiments were approved and performed in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of the Shanghai University Ethics Committee (Shanghai, China).
Plasmid construction
Human dcf1 was amplified from the 293T cellular cDNA library using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with KOD-Plus-Neo DNA polymerase (cat. no. KOD-401; Toyobo Shanghai Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and cloned into the XhoI and SmaI restriction sites of the pCAGGS-EGFP plasmid and into the HindIII and XhoI restriction sites of the pcDNA3.1-myc-his plasmid using following primers: sense, 5′-CGGAATTCATGGCGGCGCCGAAGGGGAG-3′ and antisense, 5′-CGGGATCCGTAAAATTTCAGAATGAGCA-3′. The small interfering RNA plasmid of DCF1 (psi-DCF1) was preserved in our laboratory.
Cell culture
The N2a mouse brain neuroma cells were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). N2a cells were cultured according to the methods used in a previous study (24). In brief, N2a cells were grown in an incubator containing Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) (cat. no. 32561094; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China) supplemented with GlutaMAX, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (cat. no. 10100147; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin (cat. no. 10378016; Thermo Fisher Scientific) in 5% CO2 at 37°C. SK-N-SH cells were purchased from FU Heng Biology (cat. no. FH0164; FuHeng Cell Center, Shanghai, China). SK-N-SH cells were grown in an incubator containing Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin in 5% CO2 at 37°C. The culture medium was changed every 1–2 days. For all experiments, the cells were grown to ~90% confluence and subjected to no more than 20 cell passages. The cells were harvested and seeded at a density of 2×105 cells/well in 12-well culture plates and used for fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), western blotting, cell migration assay, Matrigel invasion assay and immunofluorescence after being transfected with plasmid pCAGGS-DCF1-EGFP and pCAGGS-EGFP or pcDNA3.1 and pcDNA3.1-DCF1.
Cell transfection
Cells were plated on 12- or 24-well plates at a density of 2×105 cells/well or 1×105 cells/well and cultured overnight at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 for DNA transfection of up to 70% confluence. Lipofectamine 2000 (cat. no. 11668019; Thermo Fisher Scientific) or calcium phosphate (cat. no. K278001; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used according to the manufacturers protocols to transfect l µg/well plasmid into the cells.
Cell proliferation
Cell proliferation after DCF1 transfection was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; product no. C0038; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Briefly, the cells were seeded on 96-well plates for 18–20 h and transfected with plasmid pcDNA3.1-myc-his or pcDNA3.1-DCF1-myc-his for the appropriate time needed for proliferation. A mixture of 10 µl of CCK-8 and 90 µl of serum-free DMEM culture medium solution was added to each well at 12-h intervals. After being incubated with CCK-8 solution for 1 h, the absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The ability for the cells to proliferate was characterized by optical absorption, and each experiment was conducted five times.
Wound healing assay
Cell wound healing assays were performed in 6-well tissue culture plates. Cells at 30–40% confluence were transfected with pcDNA3.1-myc-his or pcDNA3.1-DCF1-myc-his. After 24 h, cell confluence reached ~75% and scratches in the wells were made using 1-ml pipette tips. The wells were then washed twice with full medium to remove the suspended cells and allowed to grow for an additional 48 h. Images were captured using a Nikon TI-S inverted microscope (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan) at 12-h intervals. The migration gap distance was measured using Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA) and the % of wound closure was calculated as follows: [(At=0h-At=∆h)/At=0h] ×100%, where, At=0h is the area of the wound measured immediately after scratching, and At=∆h is the area of the wound measured at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after scratching. When the samples were compared with the control cells, the differences were considered significant if P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001.
Cell invasion
The effect of DCF1 overexpression on the cells was assessed using the BioCoat™ Matrigel™ Invasion Chamber (cat. no. 354480; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). N2a and SK-N-SH cells were transfected with pCAGGS-EGFP and pCAGGS-DCF1-EGFP for 48 h, after which the cells were harvested and adjusted to a density of 5×104 cells/ml. After incubation in the invasion chamber for 22 h in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, the non-invaded cells were scrubbed with a cotton swab, and the remaining transfected cells were stained with 1% crystal violet and observed under a Nikon Ti-S fluorescence microscope (Nikon Corp.) at an ×100 magnification. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
Cell cycle detection using flow cytometry
After transfection with pcDNA3.1-myc-his or pcDNA3.1-DCF1-myc-his for 48 h, the cells were harvested using trypsin [0.25% in phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) solution without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)]. Next, the cells were washed twice with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-PBS and resuspended in 200 µl cold PBS, to which precooled 100% ethanol was slowly added dropwise, and the solution was gently mixed to reach 70% ethanol. The mixture was fixed overnight at −20°C, after which 5 µl RNase (10 mg/ml) was added for 30 min at 37°C to digest the RNA. To prepare for flow cytometry, the nuclei were stained in the dark with 100 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI) for 30 min (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA).
Cell apoptosis detection by flow cytometry
After transfection with pcDNA3.1-myc-his or pcDNA3.1-DCF1-myc-his for 48 h, the cells were harvested using trypsin (0.25% in PBS solution without EDTA), washed twice with 2%-BSA-PBS, and resuspended in 100 µl binding buffer combined with 5 µl Annexin V-FITC and gently mixed. Next, 10 µl 7-AAD was added to stain the cells according to the manufacturer's protocol for the Annexin V Apoptosis Detection kit with 7-AAD (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Samples were stained for 15 min at room temperature (RT), after which 400 µl binding buffer was added to prepare the samples for flow cytometry detection (Beckman Coulter, Inc.).
Cell tumorigenicity in nude mice
BALB/c athymic nude mice (Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China; 6–8 weeks of age, male) were used, and each experimental group consisted of 4 mice (the control group mice were infected subcutaneously with cells that were transfected with pCAGGS-EGFP, and the experimental group mice were infected subcutaneously with cells that were transfected with pCAGGS-DCF1-EGFP). All animal procedures were carried out in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of the Shanghai University Ethics Committee. Briefly, N2A cells were transfected with pCAGGS-EGFP (control) or pCAGGS-DCF1-EGFP for 48 h and harvested using trypsin digestion. Single cell suspensions were prepared, after which 2×106 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flanks of mice. The mice were raised in the same environment with a controlled temperature (23±1°C) and humidity (40–45%) on a 12-h light/dark cycle (08:00-20:00) with enough food and water provided and were observed every week. The tumor volume was calculated as the length × width2 × 0.52 (25).
Immunofluorescence
Graft tumors removed from the nude mice were fixed in precooled 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4). After fixing, the tumors were washed with PBS, dehydrated with 20 and 30% sucrose, frozen in optimal cutting temperature (O.C.T.) compound (Sakura Finetek US Inc., Torrance, CA, USA) and sliced into 20-µm sections using a cryostat (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Sections were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min and then washed three times with PBS. The slices were blocked with 5% BSA in PBS for 60 min and incubated with primary antibodies Tuj1 (dilution 1:500; cat. no. ab18207; Abcam Biotechnology, Cambridge, UK) and Nestin (dilution 1:100; cat. no. sc-23927; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C. After washing three times with PBS, the slices were incubated with secondary antibodies [cat. no. ZF-0513; Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L); cat. no. ZF-0511; Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L); Beijing Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology, Beijing, China] for 60 min at RT. Finally, the nucleus was stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 10 min, and fluorescence was detected using the Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Western blotting
Protein lysates were boiled and subjected to different densities (4–15%) of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were blocked with 5% BSA or non-fat milk for 1 h and incubated with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4°C: Raf1 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. A0223; ABclonal, Wuhan, China), Ras (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. A12212; ABclonal), Mek1/2 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. A11122; ABclonal), p-Erk1/2 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 9101; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), Erk1/2 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 137F5; Cell Signaling Technology), cell cyclin A2 (CCNA2; dilution 1:1,500; cat. no. A7632; ABclonal), cell cyclin kinase 2 (CDK2; dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. A10810; ABclonal); Bax (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. sc-20067; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), BID (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. sc-373939; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), Mcl-1 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. sc-53951; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), caspase-3 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. A2156; ABclonal), survivin (dilution 1:800; cat. no. D221289; Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), Bcl-2 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. sc-56015; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. sc-32233; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and α-tubulin (dilution 1:5,000; cat. no. 2144; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.). The membranes were washed thrice for 5 min in a mixture of Tris-buffered saline and Polysorbate 20 (TBST), incubated with KPL Dylight 800 goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (Ig)G (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 5230-0412; KPL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) or DyLight 700 goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Ig)G secondary antibodies (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 072-06-18-06; KPL) for 1 h, and washed again thrice for 5 min in TBST. Immunoblotting bands were observed and quantified using the LI-COR Odyssey infrared imaging system (simultaneous two-color targeted analysis) and software (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA).
Statistical analyses
All data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with Independent Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the statistical comparison of two and multiple groups, respectively. Tukey's post hoc test was used after the one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was considered for P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001, P<0.0001.
Results
Overexpression of DCF1 inhibits the viability and motility of N2a and SK-N-SH cells
To investigate the effect of DCF1 on NB cell growth, N2a cells and SK-N-SH cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-myc-his or pcDNA3.1-DCF1-myc-his. The result of the CCK-8 assay revealed that DCF1 significantly decreased the cell proliferation rate of N2a (Fig. 1A) and SK-N-SH cells (Fig. 1B). Our previous study indicated that DCF1 inhibited the motility of a glioma cell line (23). In the present study, we conducted invasion and migration assays to detect whether DCF1 inhibited the motility of NB in vitro. We observed that the overexpression of DCF1 could attenuate the invasion (Fig. 1C and D) and migration (Fig. 1E and F) abilities of N2a and SK-N-SH cells compared with cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-myc-his. Therefore, we concluded that DCF1 inhibited the viability and motility of NB cells.
DCF1 has no effect on the cell cycle and cell differentiation of N2a cells in vitro
Since NBs and their derived cell lines maintain the potential to terminally differentiate, and since cell-cycle arrest is tightly coupled to cell differentiation and affects the viability of NB cells, we examined whether DCF1 induced antiproliferative effects through cell-cycle arrest and cell differentiation. To assess this hypothesis, N2a cells were transfected with either pCAGGS-EGFP or pCAGGS-DCF1-EGFP and subsequently processed for fluorescence-activated cell sorting and immunoblotting analysis. The results of cytofluorimetric analysis revealed that the cell cycle was not arrested with DCF1 (Fig. 2A). CCNA2, a cell-cycle protein, controls both the G1/S and G2/M transition phases of the cell cycle and functions by forming specific serine-threonine protein kinase holoenzyme complexes with cyclin-dependent protein kinases, CDK1 or CDK2 (26). CCNA2 was also investigated using immunoblotting. No significant differences were observed (Fig. 2B), which was consistent with the results of the flow cytometric analysis. Next, to examine whether DCF1 induced NB cell differentiation, we monitored the levels of neuronal lineage markers SRY-box 2 (Sox2), Nestin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neuron-specific Class III β-tubulin (Tuj1). The expression levels of these markers were not altered after the cells were transfected with DCF1 (Fig. 2C). These results indicated that DCF1 had no effect on the cell cycle or the differentiation of N2a cells.
DCF1 promotes apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells
In view of the fact that DCF1 had no effect on the cell cycle or cell differentiation, we then examined apoptosis, another factor that affects cell viability. After the cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-myc-his and pcDNA3.1-DCF1-myc-his, respectively, for 48 h, apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells was investigated and analyzed using fluorescence-activated cell detection according to the manufacturers manual. The results of flow cytometric analysis revealed that the average proportion of apoptotic N2a cells containing pcDNA3.1-DCF1-myc-his (66.67±0.58%) was significantly higher than those containing pcDNA3.1-myc-his (24.79±1.90%) (Fig. 3A), and that the average proportion of apoptotic SK-N-SH cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-DCF1-myc-his (59.54±6.6%) was higher than those transfected with pcDNA3.1-myc-his (30.09±3.6%) (Fig. 3B). These results indicated that DCF1 had a huge impact on the process of apoptosis in both N2a and SK-N-SH cells. DAPI staining also revealed an increasing number of N2a cells that experienced programmed cell death after being transfected with DCF1. The cells with pCAGGS-DCF1-EGFP exhibited more shrinkage in the nucleus than those with pCAGGS-EGFP (Fig. 3C).
To examine the molecular mechanism by which DCF1 induces apoptosis, we evaluated the changes in the expression of apoptotic proteins, including Bax and BID, both pro-apoptotic proteins and Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and survivin (27,28), anti-apoptotic proteins that become prominently expressed in transformed cell lines and in all of the most common human cancers, such as those of the lung, colon, pancreas, prostate and breast (28). Notably, survivin is a direct inhibitor of caspase-3 and caspase-7 (29) and obstructs the process of apoptosis. Western blot analysis revealed that overexpressed DCF1 led to enhancement of Bax, a decrease of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and survivin, and activated apoptotic executor caspase-3 (Fig. 3D). The pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and BID were significantly increased; and the anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and survivin were significantly decreased in SK-N-SH cells (Fig. 3E). We also observed that the apoptosis executor caspase-3 was increased and activated with DCF1 in N2A cells (Fig. 3D) and SK-N-SH cells (Fig. 3E). These data revealed that DCF1 induced apoptosis through a caspase-dependent pathway in neuroblastoma cells.
DCF1 inhibits the growth of NB cells in vivo
The in vitro studies indicated that DCF1 may act as a tumor suppressor in NB cells by promoting apoptosis. In the present study, we investigated whether DCF1 could inhibit NB tumorigenesis in vivo. N2a cells (2×106) transfected with either pCAGGS-EGFP or pCAGGS-DCF1-EGFP were subcutaneously injected into the right flank of nude mice (8 male 6-week old mice were used in conducting the cell tumorigenicity experiment; all mice were randomly assigned into two groups, each group consisted of 4 mice) to investigate the relationship between DCF1 and tumorigenesis. As revealed in Fig. 4A, the volume of the tumor with DCF1 was smaller (0.65±0.08 cm3) than that from the negative control (2.09±0.25 cm3).
Considering that DCF1 overexpression leads to the maintenance of neural stem cells (NSCs) in an undifferentiated state (18) and the potential for NB cells to terminally differentiate, the expression levels of Nestin and Tuj1 were assessed by immunofluorescence in the tissue slices from the nude mice transplanted with N2a cells to examine whether DCF1 induced differentiation in vivo. The results revealed that there was no significant difference between Nestin and Tuj1 in DCF1-expressing graft tumors and the control graft tumor (Fig. 4B). Therefore, it was clear that DCF1 inhibited the growth of tumors in vivo but failed to induce differentiation in NB cells.
ERK1/2 signaling pathway is the target of DCF1 in NB cells
To gain deeper insight into the mechanisms by which DCF1 controls cell viability, motility and apoptosis in N2a cells and SK-N-SH cells, we focused on the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade pathway since previous studies have indicated that the activation or inhibition of the classical MAPK pathway (or the ERK1/2 signaling pathway) is crucial for controlling tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion and survival (30–35). We first evaluated the phosphorylation level of ERK1/2 using western blotting. The result revealed that the phosphorylation level of ERK was significantly decreased (Fig. 5A). Notably, downregulating DCF1 by small interfering RNA increased the phosphorylation level of ERK1/2 (Fig. 5B), which suggested that DCF1 inhibited the activation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway to regulate the apoptosis of NB cells. Subsequently, we detected the upstream regulator of ERK1/2, including Ras, Raf1 and MEK1/2 using immunoblotting. The results revealed that DCF1 significantly decreased the protein expression levels of Ras, Raf1 and MEK1/2 (Fig. 5A), while downregulated expression of DCF1 enhanced the expression of the proteins involved in the ERK1/2 signaling pathway, which indicated the activation of the ERK1/2 pathway (Fig. 5B). These results demonstrated that DCF1 regulated the viability and motility of N2a cells by inhibiting the ERK signaling pathway
Discussion
NB is a lethal cancer of the brain, and despite great endeavors to improve treatment methods and to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying this disease, the results remain far from our expectations; therefore, it is important and critical to find a treatment method to eradicate or inhibit NB. In the present study, for the first time, the critical role of DCF1 was demonstrated with regard to the inhibition of proliferation, motility, invasion and apoptosis of N2a and SK-N-SH cells. We also examined the expression levels of pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and BID, and anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2, Mcl-1, survivin and caspase-3. As anticipated, Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and survivin were downregulated, and Bax and BID were upregulated. Finally, DCF1 activated the apoptotic executor caspase-3 and suppressed the growth, but not the differentiation, of tumorigenesis in vivo. Although previous studies have shown that DCF1 can inhibit tumors, the mechanism by which DCF1 functions in cancers has not been fully investigated. In the present, we identified the ERK signaling pathway as a target of DCF1. The Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK cascade played a critical role in the regulation of cell-cycle progression and cell survival, and the aberrant activation of genes within the cascade was involved in the development and progression of nearly one-third of all human cancers (36–39). BRAF or RAS (KRAS, HRAS, or NRAS) mutations could be detected in nearly all tumor cases. RAS mutations are found in >50% of all pancreatic cancers, and BRAF mutations, particularly those involved with the Valine 600 codon, are found in very high percentages in several cancers, such as hairy cell leukemia, melanomas and Langerhans cell histiocytosis (40). Considering that these mutations exhibited wide distribution and played a critical role in several malignancies, great efforts are being made to develop drugs specifically targeting members of this pathway. Unfortunately, although considerable clinical efficacy has emerged by treating cancer patients with Ras, Raf and MEK inhibitors, the acquired resistance from this therapy is one negative side effect. Most cases of resistance were considered ERK dependent, which implies that inhibiting the activity of Ras, Raf, MEK or ERK1/2 could still be an effective method by which to activate the downstream substrate or target genes. Based on this, it has been suggested that ERK1/2 may be an optimal target to conquer the acquired resistance to Ras, Raf and MEK inhibitors (17); therefore, it is now the target in anticancer therapy and it is the subject of more intense studies (41). Our data revealed that DCF1 overexpression reduced the expression or inhibited the activity of Ras, Raf1 and MEK to inhibit activation of the ERK1/2 pathway; therefore, we propose that DCF1 should be regarded as a potential target for treating NB.
DCF1 plays an important role in controlling tumor viability, promoting tumor cell apoptosis, and inhibiting tumorigenesis in vivo, and the data aforementioned demonstrated that DCF1 could be a potential new inhibitor for components of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway and helped our understanding of the molecular mechanism of NB.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81271253 and 81471162), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai (no. 14JC1402400) and the Key Innovation Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (grant no. 14ZZ090).
Availability of data and materials
All data used in this study are included in this published article.
Authors contributions
TW conceived the study and revised the manuscript. GL designed and conducted the experiments, prepared the figures and wrote the manuscript. RF designed the experiments and analyzed the data. YS cultured the Neuro-2A and SK-N-SH cancer cells and conducted the transfection experiment. LZ fed the BALB/c athymic nude mice and conducted tumor graft in nude mice. YW performed the cellular tests and the plasmid construction; YC participated in the IHC related experiments and in western blotting. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal procedures were carried out in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of the Shanghai University Ethics Committee.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:7–30. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R and Cohn SL: Neuroblastoma. Lancet. 369:2106–2120. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
DuBois SG, Kalika Y, Lukens JN, Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Atkinson JB, Haase GM, Black CT, Perez C, Shimada H, et al: Metastatic sites in stage IV and IVS neuroblastoma correlate with age, tumor biology, and survival. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 21:181–189. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cotterill SJ, Parker L, More L and Craft AW: Neuroblastoma: Changing incidence and survival in young people aged 0–24 years. A report from the North of England Young Persons' Malignant Disease Registry. Med Pediatr Oncol. 36:231–234. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cohn SL, Pearson AD, London WB, Monclair T, Ambros PF, Brodeur GM, Faldum A, Hero B, Iehara T, Machin D, et al: ; INRG Task Force: The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: An INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 27:289–297. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hanahan D and Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 144:646–674. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang XH, Tang F, Shin J and Cunningham JM: A c-Myc-regulated stem cell-like signature in high-risk neuroblastoma: A systematic discovery (Target neuroblastoma ESC-like signature). Sci Rep. 7:412017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
DeNardo BD, Holloway MP, Ji Q, Nguyen KT, Cheng Y, Valentine MB, Salomon A and Altura RA: Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis identifies activation of the RET and IGF-1R/IR signaling pathways in neuroblastoma. PLoS One. 8:e825132013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Martinez MA, Ubeda A, Cid MA and Trillo MA: The proliferative response of NB69 human neuroblastoma cells to a 50 Hz magnetic field is mediated by ERK1/2 signaling. Cell Physiol Biochem. 29:675–686. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vieira GC, Chockalingam S, Melegh Z, Greenhough A, Malik S, Szemes M, Park JH, Kaidi A, Zhou L, Catchpoole D, et al: LGR5 regulates pro-survival MEK/ERK and proliferative Wnt/β-catenin signalling in neuroblastoma. Oncotarget. 6:40053–40067. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vujic I, Posch C, Sanlorenzo M, Yen AJ, Tsumura A, Kwong A, Feichtenschlager V, Lai K, Arneson DV, Rappersberger K, et al: Mutant NRASQ61 shares signaling similarities across various cancer types-potential implications for future therapies. Oncotarget. 5:7936–7944. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pugh TJ, Morozova O, Attiyeh EF, Asgharzadeh S, Wei JS, Auclair D, Carter SL, Cibulskis K, Hanna M, Kiezun A, et al: The genetic landscape of high-risk neuroblastoma. Nat Genet. 45:279–284. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eleveld TF, Oldridge DA, Bernard V, Koster J, Colmet Daage L, Diskin SJ, Schild L, Bentahar NB, Bellini A, Chicard M, et al: Relapsed neuroblastomas show frequent RAS-MAPK pathway mutations. Nat Genet. 47:864–871. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schramm A, Köster J, Assenov Y, Althoff K, Peifer M, Mahlow E, Odersky A, Beisser D, Ernst C, Henssen AG, et al: Mutational dynamics between primary and relapse neuroblastomas. Nat Genet. 47:872–877. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Roberts PJ and Der CJ: Targeting the Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade for the treatment of cancer. Oncogene. 26:3291–3310. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Montagut C and Settleman J: Targeting the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway in cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 283:125–134. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu Z, Ye S, Hu G, Lv M, Tu Z, Zhou K and Li Q: The RAF-MEK-ERK pathway: Targeting ERK to overcome obstacles to effective cancer therapy. Future Med Chem. 7:269–289. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang L, Wang J, Wu Y, Wu J, Pang S, Pan R and Wen T: A novel function of dcf1 during the differentiation of neural stem cells in vitro. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 28:887–894. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li X, Feng R, Huang C, Wang H, Wang J, Zhang Z, Yan H and Wen T: MicroRNA-351 regulates TMEM 59 (DCF1) expression and mediates neural stem cell morphogenesis. RNA Biol. 9:292–301. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xie Y, Li Q, Yang Q, Yang M, Zhang Z, Zhu L, Yan H, Feng R, Zhang S, Huang C, et al: Overexpression of DCF1 inhibits glioma through destruction of mitochondria and activation of apoptosis pathway. Sci Rep. 4:37022014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Q, Feng R, Chen Y, Luo G, Yan H, Chen L, Lin R, Ding Y and Wen T: Dcf1 triggers dendritic spine formation and facilitates memory acquisition. Mol Neurobiol. 55:763–775. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Q, Chen Y, Li Q, Wu L and Wen T: Dcf1 regulates neuropeptide expression and maintains energy balance. Neurosci Lett. 650:1–7. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xie Y, Li Q, Yang Q, Yang M, Zhang Z, Zhu L, Yan H, Feng R, Zhang S, Huang C, et al: Overexpression of DCF1 inhibits glioma through destruction of mitochondria and activation of apoptosis pathway. Sci Rep. 4:pp. 37022014, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03702 View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim MS, Yu JM, Kim HJ, Kim HB, Kim ST, Jang SK, Choi YW, Lee DI and Joo SS: Ginsenoside Re and Rd enhance the expression of cholinergic markers and neuronal differentiation in Neuro-2a cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 37:826–833. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weibel S, Hofmann E, Basse-Luesebrink TC, Donat U, Seubert C, Adelfinger M, Gnamlin P, Kober C, Frentzen A, Gentschev I, et al: Treatment of malignant effusion by oncolytic virotherapy in an experimental subcutaneous xenograft model of lung cancer. J Transl Med. 11:1062013.https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-106 View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pagano M, Pepperkok R, Verde F, Ansorge W and Draetta G: Cyclin A is required at two points in the human cell cycle. EMBO J. 11:961–971. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chipuk JE, Fisher JC, Dillon CP, Kriwacki RW, Kuwana T and Green DR: Mechanism of apoptosis induction by inhibition of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:20327–20332. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ambrosini G, Adida C and Altieri DC: A novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, expressed in cancer and lymphoma. Nat Med. 3:917–921. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shin S, Sung BJ, Cho YS, Kim HJ, Ha NC, Hwang JI, Chung CW, Jung YK and Oh BH: An anti-apoptotic protein human survivin is a direct inhibitor of caspase-3 and-7. Biochemistry. 40:1117–1123. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lavoie JN, L'Allemain G, Brunet A, Müller R and Pouysségur J: Cyclin D1 expression is regulated positively by the p42/p44MAPK and negatively by the p38/HOGMAPK pathway. J Biol Chem. 271:20608–20616. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Caunt CJ, Sale MJ, Smith PD and Cook SJ: ME K1 and MEK2 inhibitors and cancer therapy: The long and winding road. Nat Rev Cancer. 15:577–592. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Y, Zhang X, Yang B, Zhuang H, Guo H, Wei W, Li Y, Chen R, Li Y and Zhang N: Demethylation-induced overexpression of Shc3 drives c-Raf-independent activation of MEK/ERK in HCC. Cancer Res. 78:2219–2232. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang C, Zheng W and Du W: CXCR3A contributes to the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 36:1686–1692. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hou H, Ge C, Sun H, Li H, Li J and Tian H: Tunicamycin inhibits cell proliferation and migration in hepatocellular carcinoma through suppression of CD44s and the ERK1/2 pathway. Cancer Sci. 109:1088–1100. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao H, Liu B and Li J: LIM and SH3 protein 1 knockdown suppresses proliferation and metastasis of colorectal carcinoma cells via inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 15:6839–6844. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferreira-Silva GA, Lages CC, Sartorelli P, Hasegawa FR, Soares MG and Ionta M: Casearin D inhibits ERK phosphorylation and induces downregulation of cyclin D1 in HepG2 cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 38:27–32. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu X, Wang Q, He Y, Ding L, Zhong F, Ou Y, Shen Y, Liu H and He S: ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (ARF1) takes part in cell proliferation and cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR). Ann Hematol. 96:847–858. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yan Y, Wang L, He J, Liu P, Lv X and Zhang Y, Xu X, Zhang L and Zhang Y: Synergy with interferon-lambda 3 and sorafenib suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma proliferation. Biomed Pharmacother. 88:395–402. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Uehling DE and Harris PA: Recent progress on MAP kinase pathway inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 25:4047–4056. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu PK and Park JI: MEK1/2 Inhibitors: Molecular activity and resistance mechanisms. Semin Oncol. 42:849–862. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Serini S and Calviello G: Modulation of Ras/ERK and phosphoinositide signaling by long-chain n-3 PUFA in breast cancer and their potential complementary role in combination with targeted drugs. Nutrients. 9:1852017.doi:10.3390/nu9030185. View Article : Google Scholar : |