TSPAN1 upregulates MMP2 to promote pancreatic cancer cell migration and invasion via PLCγ
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 30, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.6989
- Pages: 2117-2125
-
Copyright: © Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Pancreatic cancer (PC) has one of the highest mortality rates among all tumor-associated diseases (1). Less than one-fifth of patients with PC survive the first year, with a 5-year survival rate <6% (1,2). The majority of patients with PC are diagnosed at a late stage and succumb due to the invasion and migration of cancer cells (3,4). Current treatment methods, including surgical resection, radiation and chemotherapy do not significantly increase patient long-term survival (5–8). However, advancements in molecular biological techniques have created an opportunity for the exploration of effective targeted therapies for the treatment of PC.
Tetraspanins (TSPANs), also known as transmembrane 4 superfamily (TM4SF) proteins, is composed of a group of heterogeneous adaptor proteins, which exist in the form of TSPAN-enriched microdomains (9,10). As its name indicates, TM4SF consists of four transmembrane domains that interact with various cell surface signaling molecules, including integrins (11,12). It has been reported that the TSPAN superfamily affects the malignant properties of cancer cells, including their proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, infiltration and cell-cell aggregation (13,14). TSPAN1 has been identified as a member of the TSPAN family (15) and previous studies have revealed that TSPAN1 is highly expressed in gastric, colon, liver and esophageal cancers (13,16,17). TSPAN1 has also been demonstrated to be important in gastric and colon cancer cell invasion and metastasis (18,19). However, the role of TSPAN1 in PC, specifically in PC cell migration and invasion, is yet to be fully elucidated.
In the present study, various methods including immunohistochemistry (IHC), reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blotting were utilized to determine and assess the expression of TSPAN1 in human PC tissue samples, respective adjacent normal pancreatic tissue samples and in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines. Furthermore, RT-qPCR and western blotting were performed to assess the expression of TSPAN1 following transfection with TSPAN1 small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and pLNCX-TSPAN1-cDNA recombinant plasmids in human PC cell lines. Subsequently, cell migration and invasion were assessed via Transwell assays. The expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP2) and MMP9 were also determined and the molecular mechanism of TSPAN1 in human PC cell migration and invasion was further examined by employing phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ) siRNA.
Materials and methods
Tissues, cell lines and cell culture
The following PC cell lines SW1990, BxPC3, Capan1 and PANC-1, 293 and the immortalized non-tumorigenic human normal pancreatic epithelial cell line (HPDE) were purchased from Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in a humidified incubator at 37°C under 5% CO2. Cells were passaged until they reached 70–80% confluence using 0.25% (w/v) trypsin solution in 0.02% (w/v) EDTA. A total of 20 pairs of human PC tissue samples and their respective adjacent normal pancreatic tissue samples were obtained from China Medical University (Liaoning, China). Official written informed consent was obtained from each patient. A total of 95 patients were recruited between June 2015 and June 2016 (52 males and 43 females; age, 39–81 years). PC diagnosis was confirmed in all patients included in the present study. Patients had not undergone radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Tissue samples were collected during routine surgery performed in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Cancer Hospital of China Medical University and the Department of General Surgery, Shenjing Hospital of China Medical University. The present study was approved by the Ethical Committee of China Medical University.
IHC
The expression of TSPAN1 in tissue samples was detected via IHC staining. Tissue was fixed with 10% formalin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at room temperature for 18 h, paraffin-embedded using a tissue processor (Model, ATP700; Histo-Line laboratories, Milan, Italy) and sectioned on a microtome (Model, Leica RM 2165, Germany) to 4 µm thick sections. Samples were collected on silane-coated slides for immunohistochemical staining. The tissue sections were sequentially deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigens were then retrieved at 95°C using 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0; Merck KGaA). Freshly prepared 3% H2O2 was used to quench endogenous peroxidase activity. Blocking was subsequently performed with 10% normal serum (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at room temperature for 1 h. The sections were then sequentially incubated with anti-TSPAN1 primary antibodies (1:200; cat. no. NBP2-33867; Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 37°C for 2 h. Tissues were then incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (1:1,000; cat. no. BAF008; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) at room temperature for 30 min and washed with PBS. This was followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated streptavidin (1:2,000; cat. no. N100; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 5 min at room temperature. Immunostaining was developed using the 3,3-Diaminobenzidine substrate (Gene Tech Co., Ltd., Hong Kong, China) for 10 min at room temperature. Sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at room temperature for 3 min. Sections that were incubated with PBS only served as the negative control. Cells were examined under an inverted-TS100 microscope (magnification, ×200; Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and the Aperio Scanscope XT system (Aperio, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to analyze the stained tissues sections.
RT-qPCR
An RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract RNA from cells (HPDE, SW1990, BxPC3, Capan1, PANC-1, 293 cells, the transfected SW1990 and the transfected BxPC3 cells) following the manufacturer's protocol. Reverse transcription (RT) was performed as follows: A mixture of 2 µg total RNA and 1 µl Oligo (dT) was heated to 70°C for 5 min, rapidly cooled on ice and mixed with a reaction mixture containing 5 µl M-MLV RT 5X Buffer (cat. no. M531A; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), 0.5 µl deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (25 µM; cat. no. U1240; Promega Corporation), 0.7 µl RNAse inhibitor (2500 U; RNasin®; cat. no. N211A; Promega Corporation) and 1 µl M-MLV reverse transcriptase (10,000 U; cat. no. M170A; Promega Corporation). The reaction volume was made up to 25 µl with RNA-free water, and then incubated at 42°C for 1 h and then 70°C for 10 min. Real-time PCR was performed using a total reaction volume of 20 µl, which included 2X Mix SYBR-Green I (10 µl; Promega Corporation), primer (0.25 µl, 10 pmol/l), template DNA (1 µl) and sterile water. RT-qPCR was performed using the Applied Biosystems 7900HT thermal cycler instrument (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The following thermocycling conditions were used: Initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 50 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and then 60°C for 45 sec. Target gene expression were assessed by calculating fold change using the formula: Fold change = 2 - [Cq (control) gene X-Cq (control) actin] [Cq (activated) gene X-Cq (activated) actin] (20). The following primer sequences were utilized: Human TSPAN1 forward, 5′-CGTTGTGGTCTTTGCTCTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTCTTGATGGCAGGCACTAC-3′; Human MMP2 forward, 5′-CTCGGTAGGGACATGCTAAGTAGAG-3′ and reverse, 5′-CCTCTGGAGGTTCGACGTGA-3′; Human MMP9 forward 5′-TCATGAGGAAGAGCTCTGAGT-3′ and reverse 5′-TCATGAGGAAGAGCTCTGAGT-3′; and Human GAPDH forward, 5′-GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC-3′. The relative mRNA expression of TSPAN1, PLCγ and MMPs were normalized to the respective endogenous GAPDH mRNA expression.
Western blot analysis
Radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer and a protease inhibitor were used to lyse cells and collect protein (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) (21). A BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to quantify protein concentration. A total of 50 µg of protein from each sample was denatured, resolved using 10% SDS-PAGE gradient gel (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and electro-blotted to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (EMD Millipore). Membranes were then incubated with 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at room temperature and stained with primary antibodies against TSPAN1 (1:300; cat. no. NBP2-33867; Bio-Techne) MMP2 (1:500; cat. no. 4022; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), PLCγ1 (1:500; cat. no. 14008; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), phosphorylated PLCγ1 (1:500; cat. no. 5690; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and anti-β-actin (1:1,000; cat. no. NB600-503; Novus Biologicals, LLC, Littleton, CO, USA) at 4°C overnight. The PVDF membrane was washed with TBST three times and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (HRP-linked anti-rabbit IgG antibodies; 1:3,000; cat. no. NB710-57836; Novus Biologicals, LLC) for 90 min at room temperature. Enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to develop protein signals. A scanning densitometer along with Quantity One Software (version 4.4.1; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) was used to quantify the optical density of each protein band. Protein band density was normalized to the corresponding β-actin density.
Cytosolic protein was isolated from particulate-conjugated protein using the digitonin separation method from the transfected SW1990 and BxPC3 cells (22). Cells were collected and re-suspended in 1 ml saline solution (1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, 2 mM EGTA, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 100 µg/ml digitonin) with occasional shaking for 10 min. Cells were then centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C and the resulting supernatant contained the cytosolic proteins. The cell pellet was dissolved in 1 ml lysis buffer (pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM PBS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF, 0.1% SDS, 1 µg/ml aprotinin and 10 µg/ml leupeptin) and the membrane protein was obtained (particulate-conjugated proteins). A total of 80 µg of protein was separated via SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane as aforementioned. The expression of PLCγ1 and phosphorylated PLCγ1 were detected using western blotting as aforementioned.
Knockdown of TSPAN1 in SW1990 and BxPC3 cells by RNAi
The downregulation of TSPAN1 in SW1990 and BxPC3 cells was achieved using specific siRNAs targeting TSPAN1 (TSPAN1 siRNA; cat. no. 4392420; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cells transfected with scramble siRNA (cat. no. 4390846; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) were used as the control. The TSPAN1 siRNA group sequences were: 5′-GGCUCACGACCAAAAAGUAtt-3′ (sense) and 5′-UACUUUUUGGUCGUGAGCCtt-3′ (antisense). The scramble siRNA group sequences were: 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT-3′ (sense), 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAAdTdT-3′ (antisense). The transfection of siRNAs into SW1990 and BxPC3 cells was performed following the manufacturer's protocol. SW1990 and BxPC3 cells were re-suspended at a density of 1×105 cells/ml in DMEM medium. The RNAi MAX Lipofectamine transfection agent (Ambion; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), siRNA (20 nM) and DMEM medium were mixed to prepare transfection complexes. SW1990 and BxPC3 cells were then mixed with the transfection complexes, seeded in 6-well (2×105 cells/well) plates (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY, USA) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. RNA analysis was conducted on cells 48 h post-transfection, while protein analysis was performed 72 h post-transfection. The silencing efficiency of TSPAN1 siRNA was confirmed using RT-qPCR and western blotting. The transfection method of PLCγ siRNA (cat. no. 1299001; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) into 293, SW1990 and BxPC3 cells, along with the determination of silencing efficacy were the same as aforementioned.
Overexpression of TSPAN1 in SW1990 and BxPC3 cells
A TSPAN1 cDNA clone plasmid was purchased from Beijing Zeping Bioscience & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China; cat. no. HG 13073-UT). Recombinant plasmids (pLNCX-TSPAN1-cDNA) were constructed and sequenced by Bio Sune Biotechnologies (Shanghai, China). A total of 10 µg of pLNCX-TSPAN1-cDNA recombinant plasmid was transfected into 293, SW1990 and BxPC3 cells via the calcium phosphate precipitation method (23). SW1990, 293 and BxPC3 cells were grown on a 35 mm cell culture dish until they reached 70–80% confluence. The DNA-calcium phosphate precipitation transfection complexes were prepared by mixing plasmid DNA and 2 M CaCl2 (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) in HEPES buffered saline (included 50 mM HEPES, 280 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM Na2HPO4; pH 7.1; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). The transfection complexes were subsequently added into the cells drop by drop and incubated for 8 h at 37°C. Fresh DMEM medium was then added for cell culture at 37°C. The pLNCX plasmid was transfected into cells to serve as the control. At 48 h post-transfection, 0.25% (w/v) trypsin solution in 0.02% (w/v) EDTA was used to harvest cells, which were then cultured in DMEM medium with G418 (500 mg/l; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) to screen positive transfection clones. Following 2–3 weeks, positive clones were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated calf serum (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and G418 (200 µg/ml) at 37°C in 5% CO2.
Assessment of cell migration and cell invasion in vitro by Transwell assay
Cell migration was measured using the BD Falcon HTS multi-well insert system (pore size, 8.0 µm, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) (24). DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FCS at a volume of 500 µl was added to the lower chamber of the wells. Transfected SW1990 and BxPC3 cells suspended in serum-free DMEM medium were added into the insert at a density of 1.5×105 cells/ml. Non-migrated cells (the cells remaining in the insert) were removed following incubation for 6 h at 37°C by gently scraping with cotton swabs. Cells at the bottom of the insert, which represent the migrated cells, were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. Fixed cells were then stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min at room temperature. Excess stain was removed by washing the inserts with Milli-Q water (Merck KGaA). Filters were then dried overnight. The number of migrated cells was estimated by counting cells in five random fields and images were obtained using light microscopy and captured using a camera (magnification, ×100; Nikon Digital Camera Dxm 1200F; Nikon Corporation).
The cell invasion assay was performed using BioCoat Matrigel invasion chambers (BD Biosciences) (25). A total of 50 µg of reduced serum Matrigel (BD Biosciences) was added to the upper chamber of the inserts to coat the Transwell membrane. Transfected SW1990 and BxPC3 cellsin serum-free DMEM (1×106) were added into the upper chambers. DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS was added to the lower chamber and served as a chemoattractant. Following 48 h of incubation at 37°C, the membrane facing the lower chamber (where invaded cells were present) was gently removed and mounted on a glass slide. The subsequent steps for fixation, staining and measuring the level of cell invasion were as aforementioned for the migration assay.
Statistical analysis
The results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate. SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to determine significant differences. For comparisons between two groups, a two-tailed Student's t-test was performed. One-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey's post hoc test was used to assess significant differences among multiple groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Expression of TSPAN1 in clinical PC tissue samples and cell lines
The protein expression of TSPAN1 in clinical tissue samples of PC was detected via IHC staining. Compared with normal adjacent tissue samples, a markedly increased TSPAN1expression was observed in the PC tissue samples (Fig. 1A and B). TSPAN1 expression was predominantly observed in the cytoplasm of the cells. The mRNA expression of TSPAN1, as determined by RT-qPCR, was significantly increased in PC cell lines (SW1990, BxPC3, Capan1 and PANC-1) compared with the normal pancreatic cell line (HPDE; Fig. 1C). Similarly, TSPAN1 protein expression in the PC cell lines (SW1990, BxPC3, Capan1 and PANC-1) was higher when compared with the normal pancreatic cell line (HPDE; Fig. 1D).
Knockdown of TSPAN1 expression via TSPAN1 siRNA transfection
TSPAN1-siRNAs were transfected into human PC cell lines (SW1990 and BxPC3). The silencing efficiency of TSPAN1-siRNAs at the gene and protein level was confirmed by RT-qPCR and western blotting, respectively. TSPAN1 mRNA was significantly decreased in TSPAN1-siRNA transfected cells when compared with the control cells (those transfected with scrambled siRNA; Fig. 2A). Consistently, a significant downregulation of TSPAN1 protein was observedinTSPAN1-siRNA-transfected cells compared with the control cells (Fig. 2B).
Overexpression of TSPAN1 in SW1990 and BxPC3 cells
The expression of TSPAN1 in PC cell lines (SW1990 and BxPC3) transfected with pLNCX-TSPAN1-cDNA recombinant plasmid and pLNCX plasmid was determined via RT-qPCR and western blotting (Fig. 2C and D). Cells transfected with pLNCX were used as the control. The mRNA and protein expression of TSPAN1 was significantly upregulated in cells transfected with pLNCX-TSPAN1-cDNA compared with pLNCX-transfected cells. The results indicate that the TSPAN1-cDNA recombinant plasmid was successfully transfected into SW1990 and BxPC3 cells.
TSPAN1 inhibits SW1990 and BxPC3 cell migration and invasion, and MMP2/9 expression
Cell migration and invasion were determined in PC cell lines (SW1990 and BxPC3). Following TSPAN1-siRNA transfection, the downregulation of TSPAN1 significantly decreased cell migration and invasion compared with the control cells transfected with scrambled siRNA (Fig. 3A and B). Consistent with this, TSPAN1 ectopic overexpression in SW1990 and BxPC3 cells markedly increased cell migration and invasion in these cell lines (Fig. 3C and D). The results indicate that TSPAN1 knockdown suppresses PC cell migration and invasion.
Additionally, the expression of MMP2 at the mRNA and protein levels, as assessed via RT-qPCR and western blotting, respectively, were significantly decreased in TSPAN1 siRNA-transfected SW1990 and BxPC3 cells in comparison with scrambled siRNA transfected cells (Control). TSPAN1 ectopic overexpression in the same cell lines increased the expression of MMP2 at the mRNA and protein level (Fig. 4Ba and b). However, the mRNA levels of MMP9 were not changed following transfection with TSPAN1 siRNA or pLNCX-TSPAN1-cDNA in SW1990 and BxPC3 cells (Fig. 4Ac and Bc). These results indicate that TSPAN1 knockdown suppresses the expression of MMP2, but not that of MMP9.
Overexpression of TSPAN1 in PC cell lines promotes cell migration, invasion and MMP2 expression via PLCγ
The present study assessed the effects of PLCγ siRNA on PC cell migration and invasion and MMP2 expression following LNCX-TSPAN1-cDNA transfection. The expression of PLCγ was significantly downregulated after PLCγ siRNA was transfected into 293 cells, as determined by RT-qPCR and western blot analysis (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, the upregulated MMP2 expression, induced by the overexpression of TSPAN1 in the SW1990 and BxPC3 PC cell lines, was significantly reduced following the transfection of PLCγ siRNA (Fig. 4D and E). Thus, the results indicate that the overexpression of TSPAN1 promotes the expression of MMP2 and may be dependent on PLCγ. In addition, the increased cell migration and invasion induced by TSPAN1 overexpression was significantly attenuated following transfection with PLCγ siRNA (Fig. 5A and B). Therefore, the increased cell migration and invasion of TSPAN1-overexpressing cells and the upregulation of MMP2 expression may be dependent on PLCγ.
To confirm this hypothesis, the effect of TSPAN1 siRNA transfection on the activation of PLCγ was assessed. The proteins in the cytoplasm were isolated from particulate-conjugated proteins. The content of PLCγ1 and phosphorylated PLCγ1 were detected via western blotting. The results presented in Fig. 5C and D revealed that TSPAN1 siRNA transfection decreases the content of PLCγ1 in the cytoplasm and decreases the content of PLCγ1 and phosphorylated PLCγ1 on the plasma membrane.
The results demonstrated that TSPAN1 siRNA transfection inhibits the translocation and phosphorylation of PLCγ1, and thus inhibits the activation of PLCγ1. Thus, the aforementioned results indicate that TSPAN1 may affect PC cell migration and invasion as well as MMP2 expression via the activation of PLCγ.
Discussion
PC is the most common malignancy of the pancreas (1–3). PC arising from the ductal epithelium of the pancreas, otherwise known as PDAC, is the most frequently diagnosed type of PC, accounting for ~80–90% of all cases (1–3). PC exhibits high rates of metastasis and mortality. As such, the 5-year survival rate following PC diagnosis is poor, often at <6% (1,2). Therefore, effective therapeutic strategies are urgently required for PC.
TSPANs are a membrane protein superfamily that has four transmembrane domains (9). This four-transmembrane structure constructs intracellular-membrane-extracellular signaling pathways and facilitates the binding and interactions of cell surface signaling molecules, including integrin and cadherin (10–12). It has been demonstrated that the TSPAN superfamily is implicated in essential cellular activities, including cell survival, growth, proliferation, differentiation, migration, signal transduction and motility (9–14). TSPAN1 is a novel member of the TSPANs family (15). Previous studies have reported an overexpression of TSPAN1 in various types of cancers, including liver, colon and gastric cancer (16–19). In the present study, the results indicated that TSPAN1 was highly expressed in human PC tissue samples compared with adjacent normal pancreatic tissue samples. This observation was consistent in cell lines, where the expression of TSPAN1 was significantly higher in human PC cells (SW1990, BxPC3, Capan1 and PANC-1) when compared with that observed in HPDE, a normal pancreatic cell line.
To date, the function of TSPAN1 in PC is still undetermined. Previous reports have revealed that TSPAN1is positively correlated with clinical stage and negatively correlated with the survival rate of patients with cancer (25,26). In colon cancer and skin carcinoma cells, TSPAN1 has been revealed to inhibit cell survival, proliferation, migration and invasion (19,27). Furthermore, TSPAN1 has been demonstrated to promote cell migration and invasion in human cervical tumor cells (28). The present study assessed the role of TSPAN1 in the progression of PC. The results demonstrated that the ectopic expression of TSPAN1 promoted PC cell migration and invasion. Consistent with the results of previous studies, the silencing of TSPAN1 suppressed PC cell migration and invasion (12,27,29). These results indicate that TSPAN1 may be an oncogenic gene.
A complex, continuous multi-step process is involved in the invasion and metastasis of PC cells. Among these, the proteolytic degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) is an essential event (30). Membrane-type metalloproteinase directly or indirectly degrades various components of the ECM including collagens, fibronectin, laminins, HS proteoglycans and vitronectin (31,32). MMP2 and MMP9, which are members of the MMP protein family, cleave collagen and other types of ECM (33,34). Previous studies have revealed a close association between MMP2 and MMP9, and PC invasion and metastasis, which is further supported by the high expression of MMP2 and MMP9 demonstrated in PC tissue samples of the present study (35,36). The present results also revealed that the knockdown of TSPAN1 significantly downregulated the expression of MMP2, but did not affect MMP9 mRNA expression. In addition, MMP2 expression in PC cells was markedly increased following TSPAN1 ectopic overexpression. Therefore, the downregulation of MMP2 expression maybe one way in which the knockdown of TSPAN1 inhibits PC cell migration and invasion. Furthermore, the present results indicated that PLCγ siRNA significantly reduced cell migration and invasion, and the expression of MMP2 induced by TSPAN1 overexpression, indicating that TSPAN1 siRNA inhibits PC cell migration and invasion and that MMP2 expression may be dependent on PLCγ. To confirm this hypothesis, the effect of TSPAN1 siRNA transfection on the activation of PLCγ was assessed. The results demonstrated that TSPAN1 siRNA transfection inhibited the translocation and phosphorylation of PLCγ1, and thus inhibited the activation of PLCγ1. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that the knockdown of TSPAN1 suppresses PC cell migration and cell invasion by downregulating MMP2 induced by PLCγ. The results indicate that TSPAN1 may serve as an important biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of PC. Therefore, TSPAN1-targeted siRNA may be a promising therapy for PC and other types of cancer with increased TSPAN1 expression. However, future studies should assess the feasibility of this therapy in animal models to confirm these results.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was funded by the Liaoning Doctoral Scientific Research Initial Foundation (grant no. 201601417), the Project of Shenyang Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (grant no. 18-014-4-75), the National Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 81672427) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 30973501).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author's contributions
XZ, GS and XT conceived and designed the present study. XZ, GS, FG and PL performed the experiments. FG, PL and HW analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. GS and XT wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was performed after obtaining approval from China Medical University. Samples were taken from China Medical University with official written ethical consent from the patients.
Patient consent for publication
All patients provided their written informed consent for Publication and agreed to the publication of their associated data and any accompanying images as appropriate.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Vincent A, Herman J, Schuick R, Hruban RH and Goggins M: Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 378:607–620. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 64:9–29. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bosetti C, Bertuccio P, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Zeegers MP and Boffetta P: Pancreatic cancer: Overview of descriptive epidemiology. Mol Carcinog. 51:3–13. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Loos M, Kleeff J, Friess H and Büchler MW: Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1138:169–180. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F, Hawkins WG, Linehan DC and Strasberg SM: Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 214:46–52. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakai Y, Isayama H, Sasaki T, Sasahira N, Tsujino T, Toda N, Kogure H, Matsubara S, Ito Y, Togawa O, et al: A multicentre randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine alone vs gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: GEMSAP study. Br J Cancer. 106:1934–1939. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Long Y, Sun Q, Wu J, Wang Y and Jiao S: Allogeneic cell-based immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and targeted therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer with metastases: A case report. Oncol Lett. 7:1594–1598. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hall WA, Colbert LE, Nickleach D, Switchenko J, Liu Y, Gillespie T, Lipscomb J, Hardy C, Kooby DA, Prabhu RS, et al: The influence of radiation therapy dose escalation on overall survival in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol. 5:77–85. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hemler ME: Tetraspanin functions and associated microdomains. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 6:801–811. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yáñez-Mó M, Barreiro O, Gordon-Alonso M, Sala-Valdés M and Sánchez-Madrid F: Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains: A functional unit in cell plasma membranes. Trends Cell Biol. 19:434–446. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stipp CS, Kolesnikova TV and Hemler ME: Functional domains in tetraspanins proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 28:106–122. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu L, He B, Liu WM, Zhou D, Cox JV and Zhang XA: Tetraspanin CD151 promotes cell migration by regulating integrin trafficking. J Biol Chem. 282:31631–31642. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Richardson MM, Jennings LK and Zhang XA: Tetraspanins and tumor progression. Clin Exp Metastasis. 28:261–270. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pedro AL: Functional implications of tetraspanin proteins in cancer biology. Cancer Science. 98:1666–1677. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Garcia-España A, Chung PJ, Sarkar IN, Stiner E, Sun TT and Desalle R: Appearance of new tetraspanin genes during vertebrate evolution. Genomics. 91:326–334. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guo Q, Xia B, Zhang F, Richardson MM, Li M, Zhang JS, Chen F and Zhang XA: Tetraspanin CO-029 inhibits colorectal cancer cell movement by deregulating cell-matrix and cell-cell adhesions. PLoS One. 7:e384642012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ke AW, Shi GM, Zhou J, Wu FZ, Ding ZB, Hu MY, Xu Y, Song ZJ, Wang ZJ, Wu JC, et al: Role of overexpression of CD151 and/or c-Met in predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 49:491–503. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Duan H, Qu L and Shou C: Activation of EGFR-PI3K-AKT signaling is required for Mycoplasma hyorhinis-promoted gastric cancer cell migration. Cancer Cell Int. 14:1352014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen L, Yuan D, Zhao R, Li H and Zhu J: Suppression of TSPAN1 by RNA interference inhibits proliferation and invasion of colon cancer cells in vitro. Tumori. 96:744–750. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Albrethsen J, Bøgebo R, Gammeltoft S, Olsen J, Winther B and Raskov H: Upregulated expression of human neutrophil peptides 1, 2 and 3 (HNP 1–3) in colon cancer serum and tumours: A biomarker study. BMC Cancer. 5:82005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cordeiro C and Freire AP: Digitonin permeabilization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells for in situ enzyme assay. Anal Biochem. 229:145–148. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen CA and Okayama H: Calcium phosphate-mediated gene transfer: A highly efficient transfection system for stably transforming cells with plasmid DNA. Biotechniques. 6:632–638. 1988.PubMed/NCBI | |
Takahashi M, Sugiura T, Abe M, Ishii K and Shirasuna K: Regulation of c-Met signaling by the tetraspanin KAI-1/CD82 affects cancer cell migration. Int J Cancer. 121:1919–1929. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fei Y, Wang J, Liu W, Zuo H, Qin J, Wang D, Zeng H and Liu Z: CD151 promotes cancer cell metastasis via integrins α3β1 and α6β1 in vitro. Mol Med Rep. 6:1226–1230. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Haeuw JF, Goetsch L, Bailly C and Corvaia N: Tetraspanin CD151 as a target for antibody-based cancer immunotherapy. Biochem Soc Trans. 39:553–558. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen L, Zhu Y, Li H, Wang GL, Wu YY, Lu YX, Qin J, Tuo J, Wang JL and Zhu J: Knockdown of TSPAN1 by RNA silencing and antisense technique inhibits proliferation and infiltration of human skin squamous carcinoma cells. Tumori. 96:289–295. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hölters S, Anacker J, Jansen L, Beer-Grondke K, Dürst M and Rubio I: Tetraspanin 1 promotes invasiveness of cervical cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 43:503–512. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lu Z, Luo T, Nie M, Pang T, Zhang X, Shen X, Ma L, Bi J, Wei G, Fang G and Xue X: TSPAN1 functions as an oncogene in gastric cancer and is downregulated by miR-573. FEBS Lett. 589:1988–1994. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ellenrieder V, Adler G and Gress TM: Invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 10 (Suppl 4):S46–S50. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nagase H and Woessner JF Jr: Matrix metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem. 274:21491–21494. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Curran S and Murray GI: Matrix metalloproteinases in tumour invasion and metastasis. J Pathol. 189:300–308. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bramhall SR, Neoptolemos JP, Stamp GW and Lemoine NR: Imbalance of expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of the matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) in human pancreatic carcinoma. J Pathol. 182:347–355. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Khokha R and Denhardt DT: Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases: A review of their role in tumorigenesis and tissue invasion. Invasion Metastasis. 9:391–405. 1989.PubMed/NCBI | |
Koshiba T, Hosotani R, Wada M, Fujimoto K, Lee JU, Doi R, Arii S and Imamura M: Detection of matrix metalloproteinase activity in human pancreatic cancer. Surg Today. 27:302–304. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nagakawa Y, Aoki T, Kasuya K, Tsuchida A and Koyanagi Y: Histologic features of venous invasion, expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9, and the relation with liver metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 24:169–178. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |