Conditionally replicative adenovirus carrying shRNA targeting EZH2 inhibits prostate cancer growth and invasion
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 13, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7157
- Pages: 273-282
Abstract
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a type of cancer specifically diagnosed in males, with higher incidence in European and American countries (1). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic PCa (2). However, patients may inevitably develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), which has a poor prognosis (3). Therefore, it is necessary to identify novel molecular mechanisms that regulate cancer progression and develop targeted therapies to improve PCa patient outcomes.
Gene therapy with conditionally replicative adenovirus (CRAds) is an emerging experimental therapeutic strategy for treating refractory cancer resistant to treatment. CRAds appear to be an effective option for targeting androgen-independent prostate cancer. CRAds exert intrinsic anticancer activity through selective replication, resulting in target tumor cell death (4).
Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a member of the polycomb group (PcG) protein family, whose main role is to remodel the structure of chromatin. Polycomb repressor complex (PRC)1 and PRC2 are classified according to their functions. EZH2 is one of the core enzymatic subunits of PRC2, that methylates histone H3 at lysine 27 to interfere with the transcription of several genes (5–7). EZH2 is overexpressed in many cancers. It has been reported that multiple gain or loss-of-function EZH2 mutations occur in distinct cancer types (8), including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), breast cancer, and PCa. EZH2 is not only a key epigenetic inhibitor of histone methylation, but also a gene expression activator through different pathways (9). Many studies have highlighted the association between EZH2 expression and PCa development. Varambally et al (10) demonstrated a positive association between EZH2 protein expression and PCa invasiveness (7,11). Following radical prostatectomy, EZH2 overexpression is associated with both metastasis and higher risk of PCa recurrence (12). Furthermore, it has been reported that EZH2 overexpression is a common phenomenon in PCa that is associated with a poor clinical outcome in PCa patients (13,14). Therefore, EZH2 was proposed to be an oncogene, and its increased expression may be used as a marker of prostate tumors with aggressive and metastatic potential (8). These studies demonstrate the role of EZH2 in PCa invasiveness, and suggest that EZH2 may be an effective therapeutic target in PCa therapy. Therefore, the elucidating the mechanisms that regulate EZH2 function may provide therapeutic insights into the treatment of this cancer.
The catalytic component of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is not expressed in the majority of primary somatic human cells, whereas most cancer cells reactivate telomerase by transcriptional upregulation of Htert (15). It has been demonstrated that the hTERT promoter can be used to restrict gene expression of E1-deleted replication defective adenoviral vectors to telomerase-positive cancer cells (16).
In the present study, the generation of a new adenovirus Ad-hTERT-EZH2 small hairpin (sh)RNA was reported, in which EZH2 shRNA expression cassettes containing the hTERT promoter were inserted. It was found that the Ad-hTERT-EZH2shRNA showed excellent antitumor efficacy on PCa in vitro. The results suggested that Ad-hTERT-EZH2shRNA may be a promising agent for the treatment of PCa.
Materials and methods
Tissue specimens
CRPC and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) specimens were obtained from transurethral resection of the prostate procedures, following the occurrence of lower urinary tract symptoms. Androgen-dependent prostate cancer (ADPC) samples were obtained from radical prostatectomies. No other treatments, including ADT, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were performed. Clinical pathological data were obtained from the clinical medical college of Yangzhou University from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018. In this prospective study, 120 patients aged 62–77 were enrolled, including 10 CRPC cases, 60 ADPC cases and 50 BPH cases. All of the tissue specimens were confirmed by two pathologists. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province and patient consent was obtained prior to tissue collection.
CRAd construction
The hTERT promoter sequence (Table I) was obtained from the relevant reference (17). The conventional cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter was replaced with a hTERT promoter in the adenovirus plasmid with green fluorescence. Ad-hTERT-EZH2shRNA was constructed by encoding EZH2-shRNA, which had the following sequences: shRNA1, 5′-GCTAGGTTAATTGGGACCAAA-3′; shRNA2, 5′-GGATGGTACTTTCATTGAAGA-3′; negative control, 5′-TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3′ (17). The construction of CRAds was as described previously (18). The other two complexes were also constructed to act as controls (Ad-CMV and Ad-CMV-EZH2-shRNA). All plasmid constructs were confirmed by detecting the DNA sequences (19).
Immunohistochemistry assay
All specimens were fixed in 4% formaldehyde at room temperature for 6 h following excision. Paraffin sections were dewaxed by xylene and hydrated in a gradient ethanol series. All immunohistochemical tissue sections were evaluated by two independent pathologists. Immunohistochemistry was performed with a primary antibody against human EZH2 (cat. no. 3147S; 1:200; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) at 4°C overnight. The secondary antibody (anti mouse IgG; cat. no. 7076P2; 1:2,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) was applied at 37°Cfor 15 min. For EZH2 expression scoring, the intensity of positive signal was evaluated by eye, as follows: 0, no staining; 1, low staining; 2, medium staining; and 3, strong staining (20). The samples were then categorized into two groups according to the scores assessed: <2, low expression; 2–3, high expression.
Cell culture
Human PCa cell lines (PC3 and DU145) were provided by the Stem Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 in RPMI-1640 (HyClone Laboratories; GE Healthcare Life Sciences), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone Laboratories; GE Healthcare Life Sciences), 50 IU/ml penicillin and 50 mg/ml streptomycin (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology).
Transient transfection
Cells were cultured at 37°C overnight in 6-well plates for 24 h, until 50–70 % confluence was reached. The frozen virus was thawed in an ice bath, prior to transfection on the 2nd day. The virus was diluted to the desired density according to the preliminary experiment (1×1010 pfu/ml). Cells and virus were mixed and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Next, the medium was replaced with fresh medium and cells were incubated for 24–36 h before infection was observed by fluorescence microscopy. Transfection efficiency was confirmed by western blotting. Cell proliferation and invasion were assayed following transfection.
Western blotting
Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (21). Cells were collected and lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer and the protein samples (50 µg) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and electrophoretically transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membrane was incubated with the following primary antibodies at 4°C overnight: EZH2 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 3147S; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), E-cadherin (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 4A2C7; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), Cyclin D1 (CCND1; dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. A0310; Shenzhen Yinji Technology, Co., Ltd.) and proliferation marker protein Ki-67 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 14-5698-82; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), followed by secondary antibody (dilution 1:2,000; cat. no. 7076P2; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) incubation at room temperature for 2 h. Finally, signal detection was performed by chemiluminescence using an ECL kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). GAPDH (dilution 1:10,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) was used as a protein loading control. Signals were visualized by using a Molecular Image ChemiDocÔ XRS+ system with Image Lab software version 5.2.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).
Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
RT-qPCR assays were used to detect EZH2 transcript expression. According to the manufacturer's instructions, total RNA was extracted from cell samples using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and 1 µg total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (cat. no. 18090050; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). EZH2 and internal control GAPDH were then amplified by qPCR using the following primers: EZH2 forward, 5′-CCAAGAGAGCCATCCAGACT-3′ and reverse, 5′-CGATGCCGACATACTTCAGG-3′; GAPDH forward, 5′-GCATCAAGGGAGACACCA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGACCTAACTAAAGCACCAGA-3′ (22). qPCR was conducted by using the Step One PlusÔ Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). All samples were amplified in triplicate. The PCR thermocycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 30 sec, then 40 cycles of 10 sec at 95°C, 60°C for 20 sec and 70°C for 10 sec. The 2−ΔΔCq method was used to calculate relative gene expression (23).
Transwell Matrigel invasion assay
Cell invasion ability was detected in 24-well plates. Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was diluted to 8-fold with serum-free medium, which was then injected into the upper chambers with polycarbonate membranes (8 µm pore size) the night before the experiment. Next, transfected PC3 and DU145 cells were diluted to 5×104/ml and added into the upper chamber with serum-free medium (200 µl), and the lower chambers were filled with 200 µl complete medium (RPMI-1640 with 10% FBS). Cells were cultured for 12 h at 37°C at an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Non-invading cells were removed from the top of the filter and invaded cells were fixed with 100% methanol for 30 min at room temperature. Crystal violet (0.1%) was used to stain the cells at room temperature for 10 min and the invaded cell number was counted in 10 random fields of view using an inverted light microscope.
Cell Counting Kit (CKK)-8 assay
Cell growth was analyzed by using a WST-8 Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Shanghai, China). Cells (2.5×103) suspended in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated for 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively. CCK-8 solution (10 µl) was added to each well for 30 min at 37°C. Absorbance was subsequently measured at 450 nm with a microplate reader.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from at least three independent experiments. Differences were assessed by Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Recurrence survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Clinical relevance of EZH2 expression in human PCa specimens
First, the expression of EZH2 in BPH, ADPC and CRPC patients was examined by immunohistochemistry. Compared with the BPH specimens, the expression of EZH2 was markedly upregulated in ADPC and CRPC specimens (Fig. 1A). The expression of EZH2 was associated with the category of specimens (P<0.01; Fig. 1B). After 18–30 months on ADT, large amounts of patients of ADPC progress to CRPC, particularly in patients whose EZH2 intensity scores were equal to 3 (P<0.05; Fig. 1C). The time of progression-free survival in ADPC patients with EZH2 scores <2 was significantly increased compared to patients with EZH2 scores ≥2 (P<0.05; Fig. 1D).
Successful construction of conditionally replicative adenovirus
Following CRAd construction, shRNA and hTERT promoter expression was identified in the monoclonal colonies by sequencing (Fig. 2A-C). For the hTERT promoter, the arrow symbol indicated the reverse complementary sequence from the beginning to the end. The correct clone was the successfully constructed target gene of adenovirus vector. CCK-8 assays were used to detect the transfection efficiency of the two shRNAs in the PC3 cell line. shRNA2 exhibited better inhibition of PC3 proliferation (Fig. 2D). As EZH2 and its protein are overexpressed in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells (24), adenovirus was transfected into these cells, which were then observed under a microscope 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after transfection. The fluorescence indicated that the transfected cells increased gradually with the extension of time which indirectly represented that adenovirus vector was successfully constructed (Fig. 2E).
EZH2 expression is reduced by Ad-hTERT-EZH2shRNA
PCa cells (PC3 and DU145) were transfected with three types of adenoviruses, respectively. After 72 h of transfection, the expression of EZH2 was detected by western blotting (Fig. 3A). The results suggested that Ad-hTERT-EZH2shRNA (Test group) transfection most significantly inhibited the expression of EZH2 gene in PCa cells, followed by Ad-CMV-EZH2shRNA (CMV-shRNA). RT-qPCR also showed that Ad-hTERT-EZH2shRNA significantly reduced the gene expression of EZH2 (Fig. 3B).
Cell invasion assay
To examine the invasion ability of the PCa cells, Transwell assays were performed following cell transfection and compared with the negative control group. Ad-hTERT-EZH2shRNA transfected cells exhibited a decrease in cell invasion after culture for 48 h, respectively (Fig. 4).
Cell proliferation assay
To examine the tumor-suppressive function of EZH2, the effect of EZH2 knockdown on cell proliferation was measured using CCK-8 assays. Following transfection, shRNA was stably expressed in PCa cell lines, compared with the negative control. Transfection with EZH2-shRNA resulted in a significant decrease of cell growth in the PCa cell lines (P<0.05; Fig. 5A and B).
EZH2 knockdown upregulates E-cadherin and represses Ki67 and CCND1 expression in PCa cell lines
In order to explore the mechanism of EZH2 in PCa, the relationship between EZH2, E-cadherin, Ki67 and CCND1 was examined. The expression of EZH2, E-cadherin, Ki67 and CCND1 was measured by western blotting following transfection with Ad-hTERT-EZH2shRNA. Untreated cells were used as a negative control. The expression level of EZH2, Ki67 and CCND1 was decreased by shRNA, whereas E-cadherin expression was repressed (Fig. 6A and B).
Discussion
Despite advances in technology that have allowed earlier diagnoses, PCa morbidity remains high, particularly in CRPC cases. CRPC occurs after 18 to 30 months of ADT (3). Limited therapeutic options are available once androgen resistance develops. Therefore, increasing amount of research has focused on gene therapy for patients with CRPC (25).
Oncolytic viral therapy is a novel method of tumor treatment, where tumor cells are selectively infected with viruses, resulting in tumor cell death and stimulation of a specific anti-tumor immune response (26–28). Oncolytic viruses are modified with attenuated or genetically engineered viruses, which are highly specific to tumor cells, meaning they have limited effects on normal tissues (29). The main side effects are influenza-like symptoms (<grade 3). In nearly 100 clinical studies of oncolytic viruses, no serious side effects caused by viruses have been found. No dose limiting toxicity was observed, and the safety was reliable (30).
Due to their stability and well-established methodology, traditional transgenic and gene targeting technologies currently remain the main strategy used for model construction, rather than the CRISPR/Cas system (31). CRAds selectively replicate and spread within tumor cells, meaning this tool not only has a strong tumor scavenging ability, but can also be used in reduced doses. This consequently reduces any toxic liver effects of the liver, and thus CRAds have gradually become a widespread concern in gene therapy (31).
EZH2 serves a pivotal role in regulating chromosomal structure (32). High EZH2 expression has been detected in a variety of tumors and is associated with the degree of tumor malignancy, invasion and metastasis (33,34). Varambally (10) et al showed that EZH2 siRNA transfection markedly inhibited benign prostate cell growth. A previous study also reported that EZH2 may be a potential target in the treatment of PCa (8). In the present study, it was demonstrated that EZH2 staining was localized in the nucleus of tumor cells, and EZH2 was overexpressed in PCa tissues compared to BPH. EZH2 shRNA transfection reduced the RNA and protein expression of EZH2, as determined by RT-qPCR and western blot analysis. In addition, EZH2 gene expression is low in early stage PCa, but significantly increased in CRPC, compared with ADPC (35,36). EZH2 knockdown inhibits cancer cell growth and metastasis (37,38). Studies have confirmed that EZH2 is positively correlated with tumor angiogenesis, as EZH2 is involved in the formation of VEGF (39,40). Researchers also found that in ADPC, EZH2 binds to androgen receptors as an androgen receptor transcription factor, in place of androgen, thereby contributing to the progression of PCa (9). In the present study, the effects of EXH2 on PCa cell growth and invasiveness was demonstrated in two CRPC cell lines. This indicated that EZH2 shRNA had potential anti-CRPC tumor activity.
Studies have shown that the aberrant expression of EZH2 in PCa at an early stage may promote the progression of PCa into a more aggressive form (36). In the present study, decreased EZH2 expression reduced PCa cell proliferation and invasion. Taken together, these findings indicate that EZH2 is involved in the proliferation, invasion, progression, metastasis of PCa cells (41,42).
Telomerase is positively expressed in >90% of human tumor cells but absent in almost all of the normal cells (43). hTERT is a determinant factor in telomerase activity among human telomerase components. hTERT is highly expressed in ~90% of malignant tumors, but inactive in normal cells (44,45). Research has shown that hTERT activity levels exhibit a prevalence range of 63–94 % for PCa (46). Vectors carrying the hTERT promoter have a targeted effect on malignant tumors (47,48). Based on the information above, hTERT was selected as a core promoter in the present study, in order to drive a specific target sequence in CRAds so that it could specifically be expressed in PCa tissues, but not in normal tissues. Western blotting showed that the experimental group (Ad-hTERT-EZH2shRNA) had obvious advantages in inhibiting the expression of EZH2 compared to the other two controls, and that the hTERT promoter was more effective in delivering the EZH2-shRNA.
Patients with the same PCa stage or grade often exhibit different clinical features, making it difficult to accurately predict prognosis with clinical stage and pathology data alone. In the present study, the expression of Ki67, E-cadherin and CCND1 may have also been associated with both PCa development and recurrence (5,49,7). E-Cadherin is a classical member of the cadherin superfamily. Loss of function is thought to contribute to progression in cancer by increasing proliferation, invasion and/or metastasis (50,51). Antigen Ki67 is a nuclear protein that is associated with and may be necessary for cellular proliferation. Furthermore, it is associated with ribosomal RNA transcription (52). Ki67 is an excellent marker to determine the growth fraction of a given cell population. The fraction of Ki67-positive tumor cells is often correlated with the clinical outcome in cancer. Finally, the main function of CCND1 is to promote cell proliferation. A previous study has demonstrated that CCND1 significantly decreased in EZH2-deficient cells (53). In the present study, the results indicated that silencing EZH2 led to decreased expression of CCND1 and Ki67, and increased the expression of E-cadherin. When combined with other clinicopathological information, such as pathological grade, CCND1, Ki67 and E-cadherin could be used as prognostic biomarkers. However, the signaling pathways between EZH2, CCND1, Ki67 and E-cadherin remain unclear. The underlying mechanism should be investigated in our future studies.
The current study provided evidence that EZH2 was correlated with CRPC cell invasion and proliferation, but there are several limitations. First, the number of CRPC specimens obtained was small, and more samples should be used in further studies. Second, an animal model should be established in the future to better demonstrate the efficacy of the Ad-hTERT-EZH2-shRNA. In addition, gene over-expression experiments was absent in the present study, as a large number of studies have proved that the EZH2 gene is abundantly expressed in cancer cells (8,13).
Collectively, the present study showed that CRAds armed with EZH2 shRNA exhibited significant antitumor effects in human PCa cells. EZH2 knockdown suppressed PCa cell proliferation and invasion. Additionally, silencing EZH2 led to the decreased expression of CCND1 and Ki67, and increased E-cadherin expression. To the best of our knowledge, the present study revealed a novel mechanism by which CRAds with EZH2 shRNA inhibited PCa cell growth, and highlighted the potential clinical importance of CRAds in CRPC therapies.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the laboratory staff at the Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University (Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province) for technical support.
Funding
The present study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81402101).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
XG, YXW and GCZ designed the study. SGX and JJY wrote the manuscript, collected clinical information and performed statistical analyses; QS, QN, ZG and BYG assisted with immunohistochemical analysis, cell culture, PCR, western blotting and in vitro experiments. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by institutional Review Board of Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University (Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province) and patient consent was obtained prior to tissue collection.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:7–30. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Klil-Drori AJ, Tascilar K, Yin H, Aprikian A, Bitton A and Azoulay L: Androgen deprivation therapy and the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with prostate cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 184:15–22. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Massard C and Fizazi K: Targeting continued androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 17:3876–3883. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Irving J, Wang Z, Powell S, O'Sullivan C, Mok M, Murphy B, Cardoza L, Lebkowski JS and Majumdar AS: Conditionally replicative adenovirus driven by the human telomerase promoter provides broad-spectrum antitumor activity without liver toxicity. Cancer Gene Ther. 11:174–185. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cao Q, Yu J, Dhanasekaran SM, Kim JH, Mani RS, Tomlins SA, Mehra R, Laxman B, Cao X, Yu J, et al: Repression of E-cadherin by the polycomb group protein EZH2 in cancer. Oncogene. 27:7274–7284. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu L, Xu Z, Zhong L, Wang H, Jiang S, Long Q, Xu J and Guo J: Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) promotes tumour cell migration and invasion via epigenetic repression of E-cadherin in renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 117:351–362. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lobo J, Rodrigues Â, Antunes L, Graça I, Ramalho-Carvalho J, Vieira FQ, Martins AT, Oliveira J, Jerónimo C and Henrique R: High immunoexpression of Ki67, EZH2, and SMYD3 in diagnostic prostate biopsies independently predicts outcome in patients with prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 36:161.e167–161.e117. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kim KH and Roberts CW: Targeting EZH2 in cancer. Nat Med. 22:128–134. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu K, Wu ZJ, Groner AC, He HH, Cai C, Lis RT, Wu X, Stack EC, Loda M, Liu T, et al: EZH2 oncogenic activity in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells is Polycomb-independent. Science. 338:1465–1469. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Varambally S, Dhanasekaran SM, Zhou M, Barrette TR, Kumar-Sinha C, Sanda MG, Ghosh D, Pienta KJ, Sewalt RG, Otte AP, et al: The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature. 419:624–629. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xiang S, Zou P, Tang Q, Zheng F, Wu J, Chen Z and Hann SS: HOTAIR-mediated reciprocal regulation of EZH2 and DNMT1 contribute to polyphyllin I-inhibited growth of castration-resistant prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 1862:589–599. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Laitinen S, Martikainen PM, Tolonen T, Isola J, Tammela TL and Visakorpi T: EZH2, Ki-67 and MCM7 are prognostic markers in prostatectomy treated patients. Int J Cancer. 122:595–602. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gu X, Gao XS, Bai Y, et al: EZH2 overexpression as a biomarker of poor prognosis in prostate cancer. 2016. | |
Cao P, Deng Z, Wan M, Huang W, Cramer SD, Xu J, Lei M and Sui G: MicroRNA-101 negatively regulates Ezh2 and its expression is modulated by androgen receptor and HIF-1alpha/HIF-1beta. Mol Cancer. 9:1082010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wirth T, Zender L, Schulte B, Mundt B, Plentz R, Rudolph KL, Manns M, Kubicka S and Kühnel F: A Telomerase-dependent conditionally replicating adenovirus for selective treatment of cancer. Cancer Res. 63:3181–3188. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kirch HC, Ruschen S, Brockmann D, Esche H, Horikawa I, Barrett JC, Opalka B and Hengge UR: Tumor-specific activation of hTERT-derived promoters by tumor suppressive E1A-mutants involves recruitment of p300/CBP/HAT and suppression of HDAC-1 and defines a combined tumor targeting and suppression system. Oncogene. 21:7991–8000. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu L, Liu Y, Zhang T, Wu H, Lin M, Wang C, Zhan Y, Zhou Q, Qiao B, Sun X, et al: Synthetic Bax-Anti Bcl2 combination module actuated by super artificial hTERT promoter selectively inhibits malignant phenotypes of bladder cancer. J Exp Clinl Cancer Res. 35:32016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cebrià F, Kobayashi C, Umesono Y, Nakazawa M, Mineta K, Ikeo K, Gojobori T, Itoh M, Taira M, Sánchez Alvarado A and Agata K: FGFR-related gene nou-darake restricts brain tissues to the head region of planarians. Nature. 419:620–624. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sanger F, Nicklen S and Coulson AR: DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 74:5463–5467. 1977. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ruan J, Wei B, Xu Z, Yang S, Zhou Y, Yu M, Liang J, Jin K, Huang X, Lu P and Cheng H: Predictive value of Sox2 expression in transurethral resection specimens in patients with T1 bladder cancer. Med Oncol. 30:4452013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu J, Lu Y, Cui D, Li E, Zhu Y, Zhao Y, Zhao F and Xia S: miR-200b suppresses cell proliferation, migration and enhances chemosensitivity in prostate cancer by regulating Bmi-1. Oncol Rep. 31:910–918. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li K, Liu C, Zhou B, Bi L, Huang H, Lin T and Xu K: Role of EZH2 in the growth of prostate cancer stem cells isolated from LNCaP cells. Int J Mol Sci. 14:11981–11993. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou W, Wang J, Man WY, Zhang QW and Xu WG: siRNA silencing EZH2 reverses cisplatin-resistance of human non-small cell lung and gastric cancer cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 16:2425–2430. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jalava SE, Urbanucci A, Latonen L, Waltering KK, Sahu B, Jänne OA, Seppälä J, Lähdesmäki H, Tammela TL and Visakorpi T: Androgen-regulated miR-32 targets BTG2 and is overexpressed in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Oncogene. 31:4460–4471. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Small EJ, Carducci MA, Burke JM, Rodriguez R, Fong L, van Ummersen L, Yu DC, Aimi J, Ando D, Working P, et al: A phase I trial of intravenous CG7870, a replication-selective, prostate-specific antigen–targeted oncolytic adenovirus, for the treatment of hormone-refractory, metastatic prostate cancer. Mol Ther. 14:107–117. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pol J, Buqué A, Aranda F, Bloy N, Cremer I, Eggermont A, Erbs P, Fucikova J, Galon J, Limacher JM, et al: Trial watch-oncolytic viruses and cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology. 5:e11177402016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
de Gruijl TD, Janssen AB and van Beusechem VW: Arming oncolytic viruses to leverage antitumor immunity. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 15:959–971. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Twumasi-Boateng K, Pettigrew JL, Kwok YYE, Bell JC and Nelson BH: Oncolytic viruses as engineering platforms for combination immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 18:419–432. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Delwar Z, Zhang K, Rennie PS and Jia W: Oncolytic virotherapy for urological cancers. Nat Rev Urol. 13:334–352. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fang W, Ping WH, Fang CX, Yuan LC and Qian H: Construction and characterization of oncolytic adenovirus controlled under heat shock protein70 gene promoter. Prog Biochem Biophys. 2009:1536–1543. 2009. | |
Li J, You Y, Yue W, Yu H, Lu T, Wu Z, Jia M, Ruan Y, Liu J, Zhang D and Wang L: Chromatin remodeling gene EZH2 involved in the genetic etiology of autism in Chinese Han population. Neurosci Lett. 610:182–186. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Simon JA and Lange CA: Roles of the EZH2 histone methyltransferase in cancer epigenetics. Mutat Res. 647:21–29. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu X, Wu Q and Li L: Functional and therapeutic significance of EZH2 in urological cancers. Oncotarget. 8:38044–38055. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Saramaki OR, Tammela TL, Martikainen PM, Vessella RL and Visakorpi T: The gene for polycomb group protein enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is amplified in late-stage prostate cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 45:639–645. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
van Leenders GJ, Dukers D, Hessels D, van den Kieboom SW, Hulsbergen CA, Witjes JA, Otte AP, Meijer CJ and Raaphorst FM: Polycomb-group oncogenes EZH2, BMI1, and RING1 are overexpressed in prostate cancer with adverse pathologic and clinical features. Eur Urol. 52:455–463. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bryant RJ, Cross NA, Eaton CL, Hamdy FC and Cunliffe VT: EZH2 promotes proliferation and invasiveness of prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 67:547–556. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cai H, Memarzadeh S, Stoyanova T, Beharry Z, Kraft AS and Witte ON: Collaboration of Kras and Androgen receptor signaling stimulates EZH2 expression and tumor propagating cells in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 72:4672–4681. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lu C, Han HD, Mangala LS, Ali-Fehmi R, Newton CS, Ozbun L, Armaiz-Pena GN, Hu W, Stone RL, Munkarah A, et al: Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by EZH2. Cancer Cell. 18:185–197. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu ZQ, Zhang L, Gao BS, Wan YG, Zhang XH, Chen B, Wang YT, Sun N and Fu YW: EZH2 promotes tumor progression by increasing VEGF expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol. 17:41–49. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu C, Jin X, Yang J, Yang Y, He Y, Ding L, Pan Y, Chen S, Jiang J and Huang H: Inhibition of EZH2 by chemo- and radiotherapy agents and small molecule inhibitors induces cell death in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 7:3440–3452. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Debeb BG, Gong Y, Atkinson RL, Sneige N, Huo L, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hung MC, Valero V, Ueno NT and Woodward WA: EZH2 expression correlates with locoregional recurrence after radiation in inflammatory breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 33:582014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Trujillo KA, Hines WC, Vargas KM, Jones AC, Joste NE, Bisoffi M and Griffith JK: Breast field cancerization: Isolation and comparison of telomerase-expressing cells in tumor and tumor adjacent, histologically normal breast tissue. Mol Cancer Res. 9:1209–1221. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Komata T, Kanzawa T, Kondo Y and Kondo S: Telomerase as a therapeutic target for malignant gliomas. Oncogene. 21:656–663. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Köchling M, Ewelt C, Fürtjes G, Peetz-Dienhart S, Koos B, Hasselblatt M, Paulus W, Stummer W and Brokinkel B: hTERT promoter methylation in pituitary adenomas. Brain Tumor Pathol. 33:27–34. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tang J, Wang Z, Li X, Li J and Shi H: Human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression correlates with vascular endothelial growth factor-promoted tumor cell proliferation in prostate cancer. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol. 36:83–93. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
March-Villalba JA, Martínez-Jabaloyas JM, Herrero MJ, Santamaria J, Aliño SF and Dasí F: Cell-free circulating plasma hTERT mRNA is a useful marker for prostate cancer diagnosis and is associated with poor prognosis tumor characteristics. PLoS One. 7:e434702012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou J, Wang H, Cannon V, Wolcott KM, Song H and Yates C: Side population rather than CD133+ cells distinguishes enriched tumorigenicity in hTERT-immortalized primary prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 10:1122011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Abdelrahman AE, Arafa SA and Ahmed RA: Prognostic value of Twist-1, E-cadherin and EZH2 in prostate cancer: An immunohistochemical study. Turk Patoloji Derg. 1:198–210. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Beavon IR: The E-cadherin–catenin complex in tumour metastasis: Structure, function and regulation. Eur J Cancer. 36:1607–1620. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Harrington KJ: The biology of cancer. Medicine. 44:1–5. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bullwinkel J, Baron-Lühr B, Lüdemann A, Wohlenberg C, Gerdes J and Scholzen T: Ki-67 protein is associated with ribosomal RNA transcription in quiescent and proliferating cells. J Cell Physiol. 206:624–635. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoo KH and Hennighausen L: EZH2 methyltransferase and H3K27 methylation in breast cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 8:59–65. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |