Open Access

Antitumor effect of lenalidomide in malignant glioma cell lines

  • Authors:
    • Yuya Hanashima
    • Emiko Sano
    • Koichiro Sumi
    • Yoshinari Ozawa
    • Chihiro Yagi
    • Juri Tatsuoka
    • Sodai Yoshimura
    • Shun Yamamuro
    • Takuya Ueda
    • Tomohiro Nakayama
    • Hiroyuki Hara
    • Atsuo Yoshino
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 12, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2020.7543
  • Pages: 1580-1590
  • Copyright: © Hanashima et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Glioblastoma is a malignant brain tumor exhibiting highly aggressive proliferation and invasion capacities. Despite treatment by aggressive surgical resection and adjuvant therapy including temozolomide and radiation therapy, patient prognosis remains poor. Lenalidomide, a derivative of thalidomide, is known to be an immunomodulatory agent that has been used to treat hematopoietic malignancies. There are numerous studies revealing an antitumor effect of lenalidomide in hematopoietic cells, but not in glioma cells. The present study aimed to demonstrate the antitumor effect of lenalidomide on malignant glioma cell lines. The growth inhibition of malignant glioma cells (A‑172, AM‑38, T98G, U‑138MG, U‑251MG, and YH‑13) by lenalidomide was assessed using a Coulter counter. The mechanism of the antitumor effect of lenalidomide was examined employing a fluorescence‑activated cell sorter, western blot analysis, and quantitative real‑time reverse transcriptional polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR) in malignant glioma cell lines (A‑172, AM‑38). The results revealed that the number of malignant glioma cells was decreased in a concentration‑dependent manner by lenalidomide. DNA flow cytometric analysis demonstrated an increase in the ratio of cells at the G0/G1 phase following lenalidomide treatment. Western blot analysis and RT‑qPCR revealed that p53 activation and the expression of p21 were increased in glioma cells treated with lenalidomide. Western blot analysis revealed that cleavage of PARP did not occur; however, increased expression of Bax protein, cleavage of caspase‑9 and cleavage of caspase‑3 were confirmed. Analysis by FACS also supported the conclusion that little apoptosis induction occurred following lenalidomide treatment of malignant glioma cell lines. In conclusion, lenalidomide exerts an antitumor effect on glioma cells due to alterations in cell cycle distribution.

Introduction

Glioblastoma is the most common primary tumor of the central nervous system in adults. Despite treatment including maximal surgical resection, radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy, overall survival (OS) of patients remains at 14.6 months (1,2). Although several clinical trials have emerged as potential novel treatments, there have been few advances in treatment options during the last 3 decades.

Recently, drug repurposing has been successful in various different therapeutic fields, including those involving aspirin, sildenafil, erythromycin, minoxidil and thalidomide. Thalidomide was originally used for the treatment of morning sickness in the 1950s. However, in 1961, it was banned because of potential teratogenicity such as phocomelia. In 1999, thalidomide was found to exert an antitumor effect on multiple myeloma (3). Subsequently, it was again used and the side effects are now considered acceptable if the thalidomide is administered to patients with a life-threatening condition, such as multiple myeloma (47).

On the other hand, lenalidomide is a thalidomide derivative and was developed in order to reduce the side effects and enhance the antitumor effect of thalidomide. Clinically, the antitumor effect of lenalidomide was shown to be more effective than that of thalidomide in hematopoietic malignancies (812). Recently, lenalidomide has been widely used clinically as an antitumor drug for hematopoietic malignancies including multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndrome (1315). Lenalidomide has been reported to display a multiple antitumor effect including immunological activity, an inhibitory effect on angiogenesis, a growth inhibitory effect and induction of apoptosis (16). The main antitumor mechanism of lenalidomide has been proposed to involve induction of growth arrest due to an increased expression of p21 (16). It was reported recently that cell cycle arrest induced by p21 is related to cereblon protein as a primary target of lenalidomide (17), and cereblon expression is required for the antitumor activity of lenalidomide (18).

Thalidomide has been previously reported to exert an antitumor effect on glioma cells. Several clinical trials since then have revealed an effect of thalidomide on malignant glioma patients (1921). However, these trials failed to demonstrate an extended median survival time. An antitumor effect of lenalidomide in glioblastoma can also be expected, as lenalidomide is superior to thalidomide in cases of hematopoietic malignancies clinically. Furthermore, lenalidomide has a low molecular weight of 259.26 g/mol and can therefore pass through the blood-brain barrier. Lenalidomide may display an antitumor effect by prolonging progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with glioblastoma, and Phase I trials using lenalidomide for central nervous system tumors were reported in 2007 and 2011 (22,23). In these studies, lenalidomide was well tolerated in patients including children with recurrent central nervous system tumors, although the toxicity due to lenalidomide mainly involved myelosuppression and thromboembolism. Preliminary data indicated that the effect of lenalidomide was favorable. However, its effect on malignant glioma cells has remained controversial. In the present study, we aimed to elucidate the antitumor effect of lenalidomide on malignant glioblastoma cells.

Materials and methods

Materials

Lenalidomide (Celgene Corp.) was employed for the experiments. Lenalidomide was dissolved in DMSO, which was used as a control at corresponding concentrations.

Cell lines and culture

Human malignant glioma cell lines A-172 (cell no. JCRB0228; lot no. 021999), AM-38 (cell no. IFO05492; lot no. 12082003), T98G (cell no. IFO50303; lot no. 1007), U-251MG (cell no. IFO 50288; lot no. 12132002), and YH-13 (cell no. IFO50493; lot no. 1164) (purchased from Health Science Research Resources Bank), and U-138MG (cat. no. HTB-16; lot no. 1104428; purchased from American Type Culture Collection) were employed in the present study. These cells were regularly cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Nissui Pharmaceutical) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) using plastic flasks (Corning) in a humidified incubator at 37°C with an atmosphere containing 5% CO2, as described previously (24).

Coulter counter assays

The growth inhibition of malignant glioma cells by lenalidomide was evaluated by counting the numbers of cells using a Z1 Coulter Counter® (Beckman Coulter). Each well was seeded at 1×104 cells in 24 plates and cultured for 24 h. The cells were incubated in the medium with 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 µM of lenalidomide, respectively. After 72 h of exposure to the various concentrations of lenalidomide, the cells were trypsinized and counted with the cell Coulter counter. The experiments were repeated 4 times at each concentration.

Furthermore, to evaluate the underlying mechanisms of the antitumor effect of lenalidomide, we undertook further experiments employing A-172 and AM-38 human glioma cell lines. The cells were incubated for 24 h to achieve attachment and exposed to lenalidomide at a concentration of 10 µM in the new medium.

Cell cycle distribution analysis

A-172 and AM-38 cells were harvested using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) after 0, 8, 24, 48 and 72 h of lenalidomide treatment, fixed in ice-cold 70% of ethanol, and treated with 0.5% of RNase A (Roche Diagnostics). The treated cells were stained with 1 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI) (Miltenyi Biotec) for 30 min. The fluorescence was measured with a FACS-Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) at a wavelength of 610 nm (FL3). The DNA histograms were analyzed employing FlowJo software (v.9. 9. 6; BioLegend, Inc.).

Determination of apoptotic cells

The apoptosis induced by lenalidomide was evaluated by flow cytometry. The cells were incubated in the medium with 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 µM of lenalidomide, respectively. Following lenalidomide treatment, the cells were harvested using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution. After rinsing twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (−) (Nissui Pharmaceutical), the fixed cells were treated with RNase A for 1 h, and propidium iodide (PI) and Annexin V Alexa Flour 488 conjugate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) were added. Flow cytometry was performed with a FACS-Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The fluorescence was detected with FL1 (510 nm) and FL3 (610 nm). The apoptosis was analyzed employing FlowJo software (BioLegend, Inc.).

Western blot analysis

Soluble protein lysates of sub-confluent glioma cells were obtained using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Wako Pure Chemical) containing protease inhibitors (Complet Mini, EDTA-free, Roche Diagnostics) for 20 min on ice. After centrifugation at 20,400 × g for 1 h at 4°C, the protein content of the separated supernatants was determined by BCA assay employing a Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, Inc.). The protein (100 µg proteins) was loaded and separated by 12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories) for 1 h at 15 V with a Bio-Rad transblot (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The membrane was treated with blocking buffer (PBS/0.05% containing 1% skimmed milk) for 1 h at room temperature, and subsequently treated with primary antibodies (Table I) in new blocking buffer for 24 h at 4°C. After washing the membrane with washing buffer (PBS/0.05% Tween 20), treatment with the secondary antibody (Table I) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase was undertaken for 1 h in room air. The transferred membrane was washed 3 times with washing buffer and visualized using LAS-4000 (GE Healthcare) after treatment with ECL Prime Western Blotting detection reagent (dilution 1:1,000) (GE Healthcare). The proteins (Bax and cleaved PARP in A-172 cells, caspase-9 and caspase-8 in A-172 cells, and cleaved PARP and caspase-8 in AM-38 cells) were probed from the same membranes.

Table I.

Primary and secondary antibodies for the western blot analysis.

Table I.

Primary and secondary antibodies for the western blot analysis.

Antibody nameSpeciesDilutionSupplier
Primary antibody
  Anti-cereblon antibodyRabbit polyclonal1:1,000Proteintech
  Anti-p53 antibodyMouse monoclonal1:500Santa Cruz Biotechnology
  Anti-p-p53 antibodyMouse monoclonal1:500Santa Cruz Biotechnology
  Anti-p21 antibodyMouse monoclonal1:500Santa Cruz Biotechnology
  Anti-Bcl-2-associated × protein (Bax) antibodyMouse monoclonal1:500Santa Cruz Biotechnology
  Anti-caspase-9 antibodyMouse monoclonal1:1,000Cell Signaling Technology
  Anti-caspase-3 antibodyMouse monoclonal1:500Santa Cruz Biotechnology
  Anti-caspase-8 antibodyMouse monoclonal1:1,000Cell Signaling Technology
  -β-actin antibodyMouse monoclonal1:2,000Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.
  Anti-cleaved PARP antibodyRabbit polyclonal1:500Cell Signaling Technology
Secondary antibodies
  Conjugated anti-mouse IgG peroxidase Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA
  Conjugated anti-rabbit IgG peroxidase Cell Signaling Technology
Quantification of mRNA by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptional-PCR (RT-qPCR)

Cells were cultured in 25 cm2 collagen-coated flasks. After treatment with 10 µM lenalidomide, the total RNA was extracted from the cells by employing a RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Inc.). RT-qPCR was performed on a Step-One Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) with SYBR-Green PCR Mix (Toyobo). The PCR conditions were as follows: 1st stage, 90°C for 30 sec, 61°C for 20 min, and 95°C for 1 min; 2nd stage, 45 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec, 55°C for 15 sec and 74°C for 45 sec; and 3rd stage, 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 1 min, and 95°C for 15 sec. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatase dehydrogenase (GADPH) mRNA expression levels were employed as the quantitative internal control. The expression levels were calculated employing the following equations by comparing the threshold cycle (Cq): ∆Cq=Cq of p21 or p53-Cq of GAPDH, ∆∆Cq (target cell line)-∆Cq (reference cell line), and ratio=2−∆∆Cq (25). Fold changes of the related mRNA expression were calculated by using the comparative 2−ΔΔCq method to normalize the mRNA level. The sequences of primers that were utilized for the PCR are shown in Table II.

Table II.

Primer sets.

Table II.

Primer sets.

GenePrimer
GAPDHForward; 5′-CAGAACATCATCCCTGCCTCT-3′
Reverse; 5′-GCTTGACAAAGTGGTCGTTGAG-3′
p53Forward; 5′-GGCCCACTTCACCGTACTAA-3′
Reverse; 5′-GTGGTTTCAAGGCCAGATGT-3′
p21Forward; 5′-TGGAGACTCTCAGGGTCGAAA-3′
Reverse; 5′-GGCGTTTGGAGTGGTAGAAATC-3′
BaxForward; 5′-TTTGCTTCAGGGTTTCATCC-3′
Reverse; 5′-CAGTTGAAGTTGCCGTCAGA-3′
Caspase-9Forward; 5′-TTCCCAGGTTTTGTTTCCTG-3′
Reverse; 5′-CCTTTCACCGAAACAGCATT-3′
Caspase-3Forward; 5′-AGAACTGGACTGTGGCATTGAG-3′
Reverse; 5′-GCTTGTCGGCATACTGTTTCAG-3′
Statistical analysis

All studies were carried out more than 3 times. The resultant data are expressed as the means ± SE (standard error) and were considered significant at P<0.05 or P<0.01. The statistical significance was evaluated by the Student's t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test. Data analyses were performed employing the statistical software IBM SPSS statistics v.21.0 (International Business Machines Corporation).

Results

Coulter counter assay of glioma cells exposed to lenalidomide

To evaluate the antitumor effect of lenalidomide, the six malignant glioma cell lines (A-172, AM-38, T98 G, U-138MG, U-251MG, and YH-13) were incubated in medium with 0.1, 1.0, 10.0 and 100.0 µM of lenalidomide, respectively. Lenalidomide inhibited the cell counts of all malignant glioma cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1). The cell growth inhibition effect tended to be confirmed at 10 and 100 µM exposure to lenalidomide.

Effects of lenalidomide on the proliferation of A-172 and AM-38 cells

Hallmarks of cell cycle arrest including p53, p-p53 and p21 were determined in the glioma cells treated with lenalidomide using western blot analysis (Fig. 2A). The expression levels of p-p53 and p21 protein were increased at 4 h of treatment, while the expression of p53 protein was unchanged in the A-172 cells. In AM-38 cells, the expression of p-p53 protein was increased at 8 h of treatment, while the expression of p53 protein was decreased at 8 h of treatment and increased at 24 h of treatment. The expression of p21 protein was increased at 24 h after lenalidomide treatment (Fig. 2A). The RT-qPCR data showed that the p53 and p21 mRNA expression levels were significantly increased in the A-172 and AM-38 cells receiving 3 h of lenalidomide treatment (Fig. 2B). DNA flow cytometric analysis demonstrated a significantly increased population of cells in the G0/G1 phase at 24 h after treatment with lenalidomide. These findings indicated that alterations in the cell cycle distribution had occurred in the A-172 and AM-38 cells (Fig. 3A and B).

Expression of cereblon

Furthermore, to evaluate the mechanism underlying the cell cycle arrest induced by lenalidomide, we examined the expression of cereblon protein which is considered the primary target of lenalidomide. Cereblon protein was expressed in all cell lines, but the degree of expression was varied (Fig. 4). There was no obvious relationship between the expression level of cereblon and inhibition of malignant glioma due to lenalidomide.

Effects of lenalidomide on the apoptosis of the A-172 and AM-38 cells

To assess the apoptosis induced by lenalidomide, the expression levels of apoptotic hallmark proteins including Bax, caspase-9, caspase-3, cleaved poly-ADP-ribose polymerases (PARP) and caspase-8 were evaluated by western blot analysis. The data showed that there was little induction of apoptosis in the A-172 and AM-38 cells (Fig. 5). No band of cleaved PARP was detected, although the apoptotic hallmarks of the intrinsic pathway such as Bax and caspase-9 were accumulated over time following treatment with 10 µM lenalidomide. Cleaved caspase-9 and cleaved caspase-3 were accumulated during the same time course. The apoptotic hallmarks of the extrinsic pathway such as caspase-8 and cleaved caspase-8 remained unaffected (Fig. 6). The induction of apoptosis by lenalidomide in A-172 and AM-38 cells was evaluated by flow cytometry using Annexin V/PI double staining. This analysis revealed no increased population of early-stage apoptosis or late-phase apoptosis. After 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment with 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, and 100.0 µM of lenalidomide in the medium, the FACS data indicated that little apoptosis had occurred (Fig. 7).

Discussion

The antitumor activity of lenalidomide has been previously reported in hematopoietic cells. Kuramitsu et al demonstrated an effect of lenalidomide on the immune system in vitro and in vivo (26). Lenalidomide exerts an antitumor effect due to enhancement of the cytotoxic effect in T cell interferon-γ secretion. Kuhnol et al reported that the immune reaction was enhanced by lenalidomide in in vitro models (27). These studies evaluated the antitumor effect of immune cells induced by lenalidomide. However, no effect of lenalidomide on malignant glioma cells has yet been confirmed. We focused on the direct antitumor effects of lenalidomide, such as its influence on the cell cycle and induction of apoptosis in glioma cells. Much of the mechanisms underlying the antitumor effect in glioma cells remains unknown. It was newly discovered that lenalidomide showed a direct antitumor effect of cell cycle arrest in malignant glioma cell lines.

In the Coulter counter assays, the number of malignant glioma cells was decreased in a concentration-dependent manner. In most cell lines, an antitumor effect of lenalidomide was confirmed at a concentration of 10 µM.

We examined the mechanisms underlying the antitumor effect of lenalidomide using A-172 and AM-38 glioma cell lines. The glioma cells were exposed to lenalidomide, and we evaluated the expression levels of various proteins employing western blot analysis, flow cytometric analysis and mRNA expression analysis using the RT-qPCR to observe alterations occurring in cell cycle distribution and apoptosis.

The concentration utilized for our experiments was 10 µM, since our results indicated that the antitumor effect of lenalidomide was observed at a concentration less than 10 µM. In addition, Warren's phase I trial demonstrated that the safety dose of lenalidomide was in the range of 2.5 to 116 mg/m2 (23). Following administration of 20 mg/m2 of lenalidomide, the blood concentration in the body rises to approximately 2.2 µM with a peak at 1 h (28). We inferred that 10 µM of lenalidomide was reasonable for clinical use without harmful side effects.

In previous research concerning lenalidomide employing hematopoietic cancer cells, various antitumor effects including a growth inhibition effect, induction of apoptosis, anti-angiogenic activity and immunological activity were observed (16,29). In addition, induction of apoptosis was found to be related to caspase-3 activation. In addition to these direct antitumor effects, anti-angiogenesis mediated by suppression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was described (29,30).

In glioma cells, we confirmed that phosphorylated p53 and functional p53 were activated after 4 h of lenalidomide treatment based on western blot analysis. In the present study, we investigated whether the p53/p21 pathway was activated after treatment with lenalidomide, and it was found that increased p53 and p21 protein expression induced cell cycle arrest in the glioma cells. Fecteau et al and Escoubet-Lozach et al reported that activation of p21 occurred after treatment with lenalidomide; however, functional p53 was not correlated with p21 activation in multiple myeloma cells and chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells (18). In hematopoietic cancer cells, the expression of p21 protein was increased even when p53 protein was knocked out and loading with lenalidomide treatment was undertaken (31). These observations indicated that the activation of p21 and functional p53 may be independent in hematopoietic cancer cells. In glioma cells, it seemed difficult to conclude that p21 and p53 were dependent; however, lenalidomide did induce an increased expression of p21, p53, and phosphorylated p53 and cell cycle arrest occurred.

We found that cereblon protein was expressed in all six glioma cell lines. Recently, it was reported that cereblon is a target protein for thalidomide, lenalidomide, and its derivatives (3234). In hematopoietic malignancies, it was suggested that the expression level of cereblon regulates the antitumor effect via p21 (18). We investigated the expression of cereblon in glioma cells employing western blot analysis. It was difficult to establish the precise relationship between the expression level of cereblon and the antitumor effect. In order to investigate whether cereblon plays a crucial role in the antitumor effect mediated by lenalidomide, research using a glioma cell line with knockdown of cereblon will be carried out.

However, cereblon, a key target protein for lenalidomide, was expressed in the glioma cells. Previous studies have shown that lenalidomide directly binds cereblon and promotes the recruitment of Ikaros (IKZF1) and Aiolos (IKZF3) to the E3 complex containing cereblon. The complex of cereblon with IKZF1 and IKZF4 leads to ubiquitylation and degradation (3537). In the future, we believe that it will also be necessary to investigate the protein levels of IKZF1 and IKZF3.

We were unable to confirm that lenalidomide exhibited apoptosis-inducing effects in the glioma cells. Previously, it was demonstrated that lenalidomide induced apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells (38). In particular, lenalidomide activated the intrinsic pathway in mantle cell lymphoma cells (39). We hypothesized that lenalidomide may induce apoptosis in glioma cells as well, and investigated the expression changes in apoptosis-related proteins using western blot analysis. However, in the glioma cells, apoptosis was not clearly observed. Western blot analysis showed that apoptotic hallmarks of the intrinsic pathway such as Bax, cleaved-caspase-9, and cleaved-caspase-3 were increased in the A-172 and AM-38 cells. Although the proteins related to intrinsic apoptosis were activated, cleavage of PARP was not accumulated. In addition, there was no change in the expression of the extrinsic pathway such as caspase-8 during the treatment time courses. The FACS data revealed that only a few glioma cells were induced to undergo apoptosis. Lenalidomide is known to be an immunomodulatory agent that has been used to treat hematopoietic malignancies (812). It has been frequently reported that lenalidomide exhibits an antitumor effect in hematopoietic cells, but in glioma cells, the situation remains more controversial. The present study was designed to investigate the direct antitumor effect of lenalidomide on malignant glioma cell lines including cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction. The findings of previous studies indicated that lenalidomide exerted an antitumor effect on gliomas especially enhancement of immune reactions such as interferon secretion from T cells (26,27).

We used a Coulter counter for cell counts. However, the Coulter counter evaluates only the number of cells present, not the viable cells. For proliferation or cell viability assays, the MTT and ATP assays should be employed. We plan to perform further studies using these assays. Our findings were not sufficient to yield a conclusive picture concerning the mechanism of action, and in vivo experiments will also need to be undertaken in the future. Additionally, the effective concentration for an antitumor effect remains to be further evaluated in in vivo experiments. In the present study, we examined the antitumor effects of single-use lenalidomide, but not any combination use involving chemotherapy such as with alkylating agents. We need to confirm whether the effect of lenalidomide in combination use may be more effective in the case of glioma cells. Lenalidomide is becoming a key drug in the guidelines for the treatment of hematopoietic cancer including multiple myeloma (15). Several studies have shown that the combination use of lenalidomide with alkylating agents or dexamethasone can be more effective in hematopoietic cancers, and the chemotherapy regimens for hematopoietic cancers usually employ lenalidomide combined with alkylating agents, such as melphalan and cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (11,14). The standard protocol of the chemotherapy for glioblastoma also includes temozolomide, which is an alkylating agent. Furthermore, dexamethasone is often used in the postoperative management of glioblastoma (40). We speculate that the combination use of lenalidomide with temozolomide and dexamethasone may have a more potent effect in glioma patients, and this must be further researched.

In conclusion, lenalidomide displays an antitumor effect in malignant glioma cells. It induced increased expression of p21 and p53 and cell cycle arrest did occur, while there was little effect on apoptosis induction in the glioma cells.

Acknowledgements

Some parts of the present study have been included in a Japanese-language thesis submitted for the Ph.D. degree of Yuya Hanashima at Nihon University School of Medicine (Tokyo, Japan).

Funding

This research study was supported in part by a grant from the Health Sciences Research Institute, Inc. (Yokohama, Japan) for the Division of Companion Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine (Tokyo, Japan).

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

YH and AY designed the study. YH, ES and KS collected the data and drafted the manuscript. YH, ES, YO, CY, JT, SoY and ShY performed the in vitro experiments. YH analyzed and interpreted the data and performed the statistical analyses. TN, TU, HH and AY reviewed the manuscript, designed the figures and tables. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, et al: Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 10:459–466. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, et al: Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 352:987–996. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P, Munshi N, Anaissie E, Wilson C, Dhodapkar M, et al: Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 341:1565–1571. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, Merla E, Capparella V, Callea V, Cangialosi C, Grasso M, Rossini F, Galli M, et al: Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 367:825–831. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C, Benboubker L, Attal M, Pegourie B, Renaud M, Harousseau JL, Guillerm G, Chaleteix C, et al: Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99-06): A randomised trial. Lancet. 370:1209–1218. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Waage A, Gimsing P, Fayers P, Abildgaard N, Ahlberg L, Björkstrand B, Carlson K, Dahl IM, Forsberg K, Gulbrandsen N, et al: Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 116:1405–1412. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Wijermans P, Schaafsma M, Termorshuizen F, Ammerlaan R, Wittebol S, Sinnige H, Zweegman S, van Marwijk Kooy M, van der Griend R, Lokhorst H, et al: Phase III study of the value of thalidomide added to melphalan plus prednisone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The HOVON 49 study. J Clin Oncol. 28:3160–3166. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano J, Belch AR, Cavo M, Pinto A, Weisel K, Ludwig H, Bahlis N, et al: Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med. 371:906–917. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Fenaux P, Giagounidis A, Selleslag D, Beyne-Rauzy O, Mufti G, Mittelman M, Muus P, Te Boekhorst P, Sanz G, Del Cañizo C, et al: A randomized phase 3 study of lenalidomide versus placebo in RBC transfusion-dependent patients with Low-/Intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with del5q. Blood. 118:3765–3776. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Gay F, Hayman SR, Lacy MQ, Buadi F, Gertz MA, Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Mikhael JR, Bergsagel PL, Dingli D, et al: Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A comparative analysis of 411 patients. Blood. 115:1343–1350. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Stadtmauer EA, Weber DM, Niesvizky R, Belch A, Prince MH, San Miguel JF, Facon T, Olesnyckyj M, Yu Z, Zeldis JB, et al: Lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone at first relapse in comparison with its use as later salvage therapy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol. 82:426–432. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Zonder JA, Crowley J, Hussein MA, Bolejack V, Moore DF Sr, Whittenberger BF, Abidi MH, Durie BG and Barlogie B: Lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for multiple myeloma: A randomized Southwest Oncology Group trial (S0232). Blood. 116:5838–5841. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Knop S, Gerecke C, Liebisch P, Topp MS, Platzbecker U, Sezer O, Vollmuth C, Falk K, Glasmacher A, Maeder U, et al: Lenalidomide, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (RAD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A report from the German Myeloma Study Group DSMM (Deutsche Studiengruppe Multiples Myelom). Blood. 113:4137–4143. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Schey SA, Morgan GJ, Ramasamy K, Hazel B, Ladon D, Corderoy S, Jenner M, Phekoo K, Boyd K and Davies FE: The addition of cyclophosphamide to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in multiply relapsed/refractory myeloma patients; a phase I/II study. Br J Haematol. 150:326–333. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Palumbo A, Hajek R, Delforge M, Kropff M, Petrucci MT, Catalano J, Gisslinger H, Wiktor-Jędrzejczak W, Zodelava M, Weisel K, et al: Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 366:1759–1769. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Hideshima T, Chauhan D, Shima Y, Raje N, Davies FE, Tai YT, Treon SP, Lin B, Schlossman RL, Richardson P, et al: Thalidomide and its analogs overcome drug resistance of human multiple myeloma cells to conventional therapy. Blood. 96:2943–2950. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Lopez-Girona A, Mendy D, Ito T, Miller K, Gandhi AK, Kang J, Karasawa S, Carmel G, Jackson P, Abbasian M, et al: Cereblon is a direct protein target for immunomodulatory and antiproliferative activities of lenalidomide and pomalidomide. Leukemia. 26:2326–2335. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Fecteau JF, Corral LG, Ghia EM, Gaidarova S, Futalan D, Bharati IS, Cathers B, Schwaederlé M, Cui B, Lopez-Girona A, et al: Lenalidomide inhibits the proliferation of CLL cells via a cereblon/p21(WAF1/Cip1)-dependent mechanism independent of functional p53. Blood. 124:1637–1644. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Fine HA, Figg WD, Jaeckle K, Wen PY, Kyritsis AP, Loeffler JS, Levin VA, Black PM, Kaplan R, Pluda JM and Yung WK: Phase II trial of the antiangiogenic agent thalidomide in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol. 18:708–715. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Giglio P, Dhamne M, Hess KR, Gilbert MR, Groves MD, Levin VA, Kang SL, Ictech SE, Liu V, Colman H, et al: Phase 2 trial of irinotecan and thalidomide in adults with recurrent anaplastic glioma. Cancer. 118:3599–3606. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Penas-Prado M, Hess KR, Fisch MJ, Lagrone LW, Groves MD, Levin VA, De Groot JF, Puduvalli VK, Colman H, Volas-Redd G, et al: MD Anderson Community Clinical Oncology Program; Brain Tumor Trials Collaborative: Randomized phase II adjuvant factorial study of dose-dense temozolomide alone and in combination with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and/or thalidomide for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 17:266–273. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Fine HA, Kim L, Albert PS, Duic JP, Ma H, Zhang W, Tohnya T, Figg WD and Royce C: A phase I trial of lenalidomide in patients with recurrent primary central nervous system tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 13:7101–7106. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Warren KE, Goldman S, Pollack IF, Fangusaro J, Schaiquevich P, Stewart CF, Wallace D, Blaney SM, Packer R, Macdonald T, et al: Phase I trial of lenalidomide in pediatric patients with recurrent, refractory, or progressive primary CNS tumors: Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium study PBTC-018. J Clin Oncol. 29:324–329. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Ochiai Y, Sano E, Okamoto Y, Yoshimura S, Makita K, Yamamuro S, Ohta T, Ogino A, Tadakuma H, Ueda T, et al: Efficacy of ribavirin against malignant glioma cell lines: Follow-up study. Oncol Rep. 39:537–544. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Kuramitsu S, Ohno M, Ohka F, Shiina S, Yamamichi A, Kato A, Tanahashi K, Motomura K, Kondo G, Kurimoto M, et al: Lenalidomide enhances the function of chimeric antigen receptor T cells against the epidermal growth factor receptor variant III by enhancing immune synapses. Cancer Gene Ther. 22:487–495. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Kühnöl CD, Staege MS and Kramm CM: Lenalidomide in an in vitro dendritic cell model for malignant gliomas. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 16:1468–1473. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Chen N, Zhou S and Palmisano M: Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Lenalidomide. Clin Pharmacokinet. 56:139–152. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

D'Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E and Folkman J: Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:4082–4085. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Rao KV: Lenalidomide in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 64:1799–1807. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Escoubet-Lozach L, Lin IL, Jensen-Pergakes K, Brady HA, Gandhi AK, Schafer PH, Muller GW, Worland PJ, Chan KW and Verhelle D: Pomalidomide and lenalidomide induce p21 WAF-1 expression in both lymphoma and multiple myeloma through a LSD1-mediated epigenetic mechanism. Cancer Res. 69:7347–7356. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Holstein SA, Hillengass J and McCarthy PL: Next-generation drugs targeting the cereblon ubiquitin ligase. J Clin Oncol. 36:2101–2104. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Tao J, Yang J and Xu G: The interacting domains in cereblon differentially modulate the immunomodulatory drug-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of its binding partners. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 507:443–449. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Zheng J, Sha Y, Roof L, Foreman O, Lazarchick J, Venkta JK, Kozlowski C, Gasparetto C, Chao N, Ebens A, et al: Pan-PIM kinase inhibitors enhance Lenalidomide's anti-myeloma activity via cereblon-IKZF1/3 cascade. Cancer Lett. 440-441:1–10. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Krönke J, Udeshi ND, Narla A, Grauman P, Hurst SN, McConkey M, Svinkina T, Heckl D, Comer E, Li X, et al: Lenalidomide causes selective degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 in multiple myeloma cells. Science. 343:301–305. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Lu G, Middleton RE, Sun H, Naniong M, Ott CJ, Mitsiades CS, Wong KK, Bradner JE and Kaelin WG Jr: The myeloma drug lenalidomide promotes the cereblon-dependent destruction of Ikaros proteins. Science. 343:305–309. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Mori T, Ito T, Liu S, Ando H, Sakamoto S, Yamaguchi Y, Tokunaga E, Shibata N, Handa H and Hakoshima T: Structural basis of thalidomide enantiomer binding to cereblon. Sci Rep. 8:1294. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Yao R, Han D, Sun X, Xie Y, Wu Q, Fu C, Yao Y, Li H, Li Z and Xu K: Scriptaid inhibits cell survival, cell cycle, and promotes apoptosis in multiple myeloma via epigenetic regulation of p21. Exp Hematol. 60:63–72. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Qian Z, Zhang L, Cai Z, Sun L, Wang H, Yi Q and Wang M: Lenalidomide synergizes with dexamethasone to induce growth arrest and apoptosis of mantle cell lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Leuk Res. 35:380–386. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Pitter KL, Tamagno I, Alikhanyan K, Hosni-Ahmed A, Pattwell SS, Donnola S, Dai C, Ozawa T, Chang M, Chan TA, et al: Corticosteroids compromise survival in glioblastoma. Brain. 139:1458–1471. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2020
Volume 43 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hanashima Y, Sano E, Sumi K, Ozawa Y, Yagi C, Tatsuoka J, Yoshimura S, Yamamuro S, Ueda T, Nakayama T, Nakayama T, et al: Antitumor effect of lenalidomide in malignant glioma cell lines. Oncol Rep 43: 1580-1590, 2020.
APA
Hanashima, Y., Sano, E., Sumi, K., Ozawa, Y., Yagi, C., Tatsuoka, J. ... Yoshino, A. (2020). Antitumor effect of lenalidomide in malignant glioma cell lines. Oncology Reports, 43, 1580-1590. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2020.7543
MLA
Hanashima, Y., Sano, E., Sumi, K., Ozawa, Y., Yagi, C., Tatsuoka, J., Yoshimura, S., Yamamuro, S., Ueda, T., Nakayama, T., Hara, H., Yoshino, A."Antitumor effect of lenalidomide in malignant glioma cell lines". Oncology Reports 43.5 (2020): 1580-1590.
Chicago
Hanashima, Y., Sano, E., Sumi, K., Ozawa, Y., Yagi, C., Tatsuoka, J., Yoshimura, S., Yamamuro, S., Ueda, T., Nakayama, T., Hara, H., Yoshino, A."Antitumor effect of lenalidomide in malignant glioma cell lines". Oncology Reports 43, no. 5 (2020): 1580-1590. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2020.7543