Open Access

Predictive significance of STK17A in patients with gastric cancer and association with gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration

  • Authors:
    • Zehua Wang
    • Chenyi Wang
    • Bing-Hua Jiang
    • Litong Shi
    • Shan Lin
    • Lei Wang
    • Ling-Zhi Liu
    • Jian-Ge Qiu
    • Yanru Qin
    • Yongxu Jia
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 28, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2021.8070
  • Article Number: 119
  • Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed types of cancer worldwide, and exploring its potential therapeutic targets is particularly important for improving the prognosis of patients with GC. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between serine/threonine kinase 17a (STK17A) expression and GC prognosis. STK17A expression was measured by quantitative real‑time PCR, western blotting and immunohistochemical staining. Standard stable transfection technology was also used to construct overexpression and knockdown cell lines. Wound healing, Transwell, Cell Counting Kit‑8 and colony formation assays, as well as other methods, were used to explore the function and underlying molecular mechanism of STK17A in GC. The results indicated that STK17A overexpression significantly promoted the proliferation and migration of GC cells. The clinical significance of STK17A in a cohort of 102 cases of GC was assessed by clinical correlation and Kaplan‑Meier analyses. Overexpression of STK17A was demonstrated to be associated with tumor invasion depth (P<0.001), lymph node metastasis (P<0.001) and poor prognosis in terms of 5‑year survival (P<0.001). In addition, Cox multivariate analysis revealed that STK17A expression was an independent risk factor for overall and progress‑free survival (P<0.001). Therefore, STK17A may be a valuable biomarker for the prognosis of patients with GC.

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed types of cancer worldwide, with an estimated 1,089,103 newly diagnosed cases and 768,793 deaths worldwide in 2020 (1). Although there are numerous different treatments for GC, the prognosis of patients with advanced GC remains poor (2). Lymph node invasion and distant metastasis are the main factors that result in death and poor prognosis (3). Therefore, it is urgent to identify novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, which could contribute to improved outcomes in patients with GC.

Serine/threonine kinase 17a (STK17A; also known as death-associated protein kinase-related apoptosis-inducing protein kinase 1; DRAK1) is a serine/threonine kinase. STK17A is a member of the death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) family and acts as a positive regulator of apoptosis (4,5). STK17A was recently found to serve an important role in cell proliferation, apoptosis, tumor metastasis and tumorigenesis (611). However, the association between STK17A expression and the development of GC remains unclear.

At present, research on the molecular function of the DAPK family is mainly focused on the interaction between phosphorylation of the myosin light chain (MLC) regulatory subunit and the cytoskeleton, which leads to the regulation of actin stress fibers, adhesion junctions and cell movement (1214). Recent genetic evidence indicates that DRAKs are involved in the regulation of cell shape and adhesion and cytoskeletal dynamics through phosphorylation of the Drosophila ortholog of MLC (1517). MLC has been identified as one of the few targets for STK17A phosphorylation (4). A study on STK17A indicated that the expression of STK17A induced apoptosis-related morphological changes associated with membrane blistering, which was also induced by MLC phosphorylation (4,18). In addition, STK17A affects cell contractility by regulating weak metabolism, which further promotes metastasis and spread. Weak metabolism is a type of cell death triggered by cell detachment, which is necessary for survival in the lymphatic and vascular systems (19). This indicates a new direction for exploring the relationship between STK17A and tumor invasion, progression and metastasis.

In recent years, research on the association between STK17A and chemotherapy resistance has also yielded important results. It has been demonstrated that STK17A exhibits low expression in acquired drug-resistant cell phenotypes, which are resistant to oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (6). In MeWo cells, a malignant melanoma cell line, STK17A was also revealed to be associated with cross-resistance to DNA-damaging drugs (20). These results indicated that STK17A may mediate the response of tumor cells to chemotherapy and may be important for the development of cancer chemotherapeutics.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the STK17A mRNA and protein expression in GC cells and human GC tissues, and determine the effects of STK17A overexpression and silencing on the proliferation and migration of GC cells. Furthermore, its association with clinicopathological characteristics and its significance for the prognosis of GC were explored, in order to determine whether STK17A may be of value as a prognostic factor and potential therapeutic target for GC.

Materials and methods

Clinical samples

A total of 39 GC and matched normal tissue samples were obtained from patients with GC (aged from 41 to 76 years) who underwent surgical excision at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China) between October 2015 and March 2016, and were used for RNA extraction. Of the 39 samples, 26 were male and 13 were female. The inclusion criteria were as follows: Definite diagnosis of primary gastric cancer; successful radical resection of gastric cancer and R0 resection. The exclusion criteria were as fllows: Malignant tumors with other tissue origins; death from causes other than gastric cancer. A total of 102 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded GC samples from the period between January 2008 and December 2010 were also collected from the same hospital and STK17A immunohistochemistry was performed on all samples. No patients had undergone chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgical resection. In addition, tumors were staged according to the TNM staging criteria of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (7th edition, 2010) (21). Written informed consent for the use of tissue samples was obtained on their behalf from all from all patients or their legal guardians. The use of GC tissues in the present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University.

Cell lines

Human GC cell lines used in this study included AGS (RPMI-1640), HGC27 (RPMI-1640), KATOIII (IMDM), MKN45 (RPMI-1640), NCI-N87 (RPMI-1640), and SNU1 (RPMI-1640), normal gastric cell GES-1 (RPMI-1640), and 293T (DMEM) were obtained from the Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of Chinese Academy of Sciences. All culture media were obtained from GIBCO BRL Life Technologies. All cells were cultured in medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (all from Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO2.

Reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q)PCR analysis

Fresh tissue samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen after surgical resection and then stored at −80°C prior to RNA isolation. Total RNA was extracted from tissue samples with TRIzol® reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and reverse-transcribed to cDNA using the Reverse Transcription for PCR Kit (Takara Bio, Inc.) according to the standard protocols provided by the manufacturer. qPCR was performed with the ABI7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) using a SYBR Green PCR Kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The primer sequences used for STK17A and GAPDH are presented in Table I. The following PCR conditions were used: Initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 15 sec, and annealing/extension at 60°C for 1 min. The relative expression of STK17A mRNA against GAPDH was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (22).

Table I.

Primer sequences of STK17A and GAPDH.

Table I.

Primer sequences of STK17A and GAPDH.

GeneSequences
STK17Aq-F: 5′-TCTGAGTCGGCTGTTGATTTC-3′
q-R: 5′-GGGGTGCTTTAGACATTCTTCA-3′
GAPDHq-F: 5′-GCTGAACGGGAAGCTCACTG-3′
q-R: 5′-GTGCTCAGTGTAGCCCAGGA-3′

[i] STK17A, serine/threonine kinase 17a; q, qPCR; F, forward; R, reverse.

Tissue microarray (TMA) and immunohistochemical staining

Using 102 pairs of GC tissue samples and corresponding normal tissues, TMAs were constructed as previously described (23). The archived paraffin-embedded tissue blocks (21) were cut into 4-µm sections on adhesion slides and then sections were dried in a thermostat oven for 2 h at 65°C. Immunocytochemical staining was performed using the streptavidin-biotin complex method to investigate the expression of STK17A. In brief, tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in ethanol, followed by antigen retrieval in 0.1 mol/l citrate buffer solution (pH 6.0) in a microwave oven for ~15 min. After washing in PBS, the sections were blocked in 10% goat serum for 10 min at room temperature to eliminate nonspecific binding. The sections were then incubated overnight with primary anti-STK17A polyclonal antibody (1:150 dilution; ab97530, Abcam) at 4°C in humidity. In the next step, the sections were sequentially incubated with a biotin-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (cat. no. SP-9000; Beijing Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology, Co., Ltd.) at a concentration of 1:100, at room temperature for 30 min. Finally, diaminobenzidine (Beijing Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology, Co., Ltd.) was used for color development for 1 min at room temperature, followed by hematoxylin (Beijing Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology, Co., Ltd.). counterstaining for 2 min at room temperature.

Two independent pathologists evaluated the immunohistochemical results in a blinded manner. STK17A-positive staining intensity was scored as follows: 0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong. In addition, the percentage of STK17A-positive cells was scored as follows: 0, <5; 1, 5–25; 2, 26–50; 3, 51–75; and 4, >75%. The final staining scores were calculated by multiplying the scores for the percentage of STK17A-positive cells and staining intensity. To divide patients into high- and normal-expression groups, the cutoff value was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The sections were studied using a light microscope (Olympus BX 53; Olympus Corporation).

Western blot analysis

Total proteins were extracted from GC tissues and tumor cells using ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit. Proteins (20 µg) were heated in loading buffer at 100°C for 10 min and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by transfer onto PVDF membranes. After blocking with 5% skimmed milk at room temperature for 1 h, the membranes were probed at 4°C overnight with primary antibodies against N-cadherin (1:1,000 dilution; product no. 13116), E-cadherin (1:1,000 dilution; product no. 3195), vimentin (1:1,000 dilution; product no. 5741) and GAPDH (1:1,000 dilution; product no. 5174; all from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and STK17A (1:1,000 dilution; Abcam), After washing in TBST three times, the blots were incubated with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit IgG; 1:8,000 dilution, product no. 7074; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Imager 600; Amersham; Cytiva) was used to quantify the protein levels with enhanced chemiluminescent reagent (ECL; Epizyme, Inc.).

Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

The transfected tumor cells were plated in a 96-well plate at a density of 1,000 cells/well. CCK-8 reagent (10 µl; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc.) was added to 100 µl RPMI-1640 culture medium at 1–4 and 5 days and the sample was incubated in a cell culture incubator for 2 h at 37°C. Absorbance was detected at 450 nm using a microplate reader to generate a cell proliferation curve. At least three determinations were performed in triplicate.

Colony formation assay

Tumor cells and control cells were plated in triplicate in 6-well plates at a density of 1,000 cells/well. After 7 days of culture, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature, and then stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, images were captured and the number of cell colonies was counted, and clones with ≥50 cells were scored as actual colonies. At least three determinations were performed in triplicate.

Wound healing assay

Cells (AGS, HGC27, MKN45 and SNU1) were uniformly seeded in 6-well plates and cultured to 90% confluence. The cell monolayer was washed with PBS and a 100-µl pipette tip was used to scrape the bottom of the plate and create linear scratches. Then, the cell culture medium was replaced with RPMI-1640 serum-free medium. After scratching, images of the wound area were captured under a light microscope (Olympus CKX 53; Olympus Corporation) at 0 and 16 h. At least three determinations were performed in triplicate.

Transwell assay

Transwell experiments were performed using 24-well (8.0 µM) Transwell inserts (BD Biosciences). The cells were resuspended in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium, and 1×105 cells were seeded into the upper chamber of a 24-well plate. RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After culturing the cells in an incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37°C for 16 h, the cells remaining on the surface of the membrane were removed with a cotton swab, and the migrated cells were fixed with 4% methanol solution for 30 min at room temperature, stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution for 30 min at room temperature and images were captured under a light microscope.

Transfection

PEZ-Lv201-STK17A, psi-LVRU6GP-shRNA targeting STK17A and the corresponding control plasmids were purchased from GeneCopoeia, Inc.. Lentivirus containing STK17A and shRNA was packaged using the 3rd generation ViraPower™ Lentiviral Packaging Mix (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in 293T cells. The day before transfection, 293T cells were plated in 10-cm dishes cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS. When cell density reached ~60-80%, the cells were transfected with the above plasmids using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The mass of lentiviral plasmid used was 20 µg and the ratio of the lentiviral plasmid, packaging vector and envelope vector was 4:3:2. After, the transfected cells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for ~8-12 h, the culture medium was replaced with ~5-6 ml fresh DMEM with 10% FBS. The supernatants containing viruses were harvested at 24 and 48 h and concentrated by ultracentrifugation for 90 min at 50,000 × g, 4°C, and then stored at −80°C until use.

Cells were infected with lentiviruses according to the protocol of the manufacturer. Briefly, cells were plated in 24-well plates at 1×105 cells/well, lentiviruses were added into culture medium separately (the volume of lentiviruses was calculated as an MOI of 20), and medium was refreshed after 12 h. Puromycin was used to screen the stable cells after 72 h of lentiviral infection at 1.0 µg/ml as a final concentration.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 21.0 software (IBM Corp.) was used to perform statistical analysis. Paired two-tailed t-test was performed to compare STK17A expression between cancer tissues and their paired adjacent tissues. In addition, the statistical significance of associations between STK17A protein expression and clinicopathological characteristics was analyzed using the χ2 test. Survival rates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival curves were compared using log-rank testing, while the prognostic value of STK17A was analyzed with the Cox-proportional hazard model. Data from three separate experiments are presented as the mean values ± standard deviation (SD). The Student's t-test was used for comparisons between single experimental groups and the control groups. Multigroup comparisons of the means were carried out by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

Results

STK17A is upregulated in GC

Of the 39 GC tissue specimens, 31 (79.5%) exhibited higher STK17A mRNA expression compared with their paired adjacent specimens (P=0.0009; Fig. 1A). There was also a significant difference in STK17A protein levels between GC and adjacent normal tissues (P<0.001; Fig. 1B and C). Furthermore, STK17A expression was markedly upregulated in all six GC cell lines detected compared to GES1 by PCR (Fig. 1D) and western blotting (Fig. 1E).

Upregulation of STK17A is associated with advanced clinicopathological characteristics of GC

The associations between STK17A expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of GC are presented in Table II. The analysis results demonstrated that the overexpression of the STK17A protein was significantly associated with Lauren classification (P=0.018), pTNM stage (P<0.001), tumor invasion depth (P<0.001), lymph node metastasis (P<0.001) and 5-year survival (P<0.001). No other clinicopathological parameters, such as patient sex (P=0.815), age (P=0.695), tumor location (P=0.449) or differentiation grade (P=0.384). were found to be associated with STK17A expression levels.

Table II.

Relationship between STK17A protein expression in gastric cancer tissue and its clinical pathological parameters.

Table II.

Relationship between STK17A protein expression in gastric cancer tissue and its clinical pathological parameters.

STK17A expression

Clinicopathological parametersAll casesHighLowP-value
Sex
  Male7941380.815
  Female231112
Age (years)
  <605728290.695
  ≥60452421
Lauren classification
  Diffuse type261790.018
  Intestinal and mixed type763541
Differentiation
  Well and moderate5230220.384
  Poor502228
Tumor invasion depth
  T1/T225223<0.001
  T3/T4775027
Location
  Upper171070.449
  Middle813942
  Lower431
pTNM stage
  I/II49940<0.001
  III/IV534310
Lymph node metastasis
  Yes524111<0.001
  No501139
Survival status
  Survival35530<0.001
  Death674720

[i] STK17A, serine/threonine kinase 17a.

High expression of STK17A in GC tissues is associated with poor patient survival

The study demonstrated that pTNM stage, lymph node metastasis, depth of tumor invasion and STK17A protein expression levels were prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in GC (Table III). Multivariate analysis further indicated that STK17A protein expression and pTNM stage were independent risk factors for OS and PFS (Table IV). The OS (Fig. 2A) and PFS (Fig. 2B) analyses revealed that patients with high expression of STK17A exhibited shorter survival time compared with patients exhibiting normal STK17A expression. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in OS were found between STK17A expression in patients with pTNM stage I–II (P=0.019) and those with pTNM stage III–IV (P<0.001; Fig. 2C and D).

Table III.

Univariate Cox regression analysis for OS and PFS in gastric cancer.

Table III.

Univariate Cox regression analysis for OS and PFS in gastric cancer.

OSPFS


Clinical parametersHR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
Age0.629–1.6560.9350.621–1.6350.974
Sex0.676–2.0860.5510.667–2.0530.583
Lauren classification0.800–1.1760.7600.823–1.2070.971
Differentiation0.595–1.0610.1200.603–1.7080.146
Tumor invasion depth1.444–2.744<0.0011.417–2.673<0.001
pTNM stage1.569–3.181<0.0011.503–3.014<0.001
Lymph node metastasis1.799–5.109<0.0011.622–4.498<0.001
STK17A expression2.846–8.865<0.0012.573–7.619<0.001

[i] OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; STK17A, serine/threonine kinase 17a.

Table IV.

Cox multivariate regression analysis for OS and PFS in gastric cancer.

Table IV.

Cox multivariate regression analysis for OS and PFS in gastric cancer.

OSPFS


ParametersHR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
STK17A expression1.871–6.715<0.0011.744–5.929<0.001
pTNM stage1.042–2.2990.0311.022–2.2180.039

[i] OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; STK17A, serine/threonine kinase 17a.

Upregulation of STK17A promotes the proliferation of GC cells

As revealed in Fig. 3, to investigate the functional effects of STK17A, STK17A was overexpressed in MKN45 and SNU1 GC cells (Fig. 3A). CCK-8 assays revealed that overexpression of STK17A significantly promoted the proliferation of GC cells (Fig. 3B and C). Compared to vector-transfected cells, overexpression of STK17A also significantly increased the mean number of colonies in the colony formation assay (Fig. 3G-I). In parallel, STK17A-knockdown stable cell lines were established in AGS and HGC27 cells (Fig. 3D). CCK-8 and colony formation assays both indicated that knockdown of STK17A significantly reduced the proliferation of GC cells (Fig. 3E and F and J-L). These results suggested that STK17A could promote the proliferation of GC cells.

STK17A regulates the migration of GC cells via epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)

The effect of STK17A on the migration ability of GC cells was further evaluated. In the wound healing assay, MKN45 and SNU1 cells overexpressing STK17A exhibited more rapid wound closure compared with vector-expressing cells (Fig. 4A and B). Conversely, AGS and HGC27 cells with STK17A knockdown exhibited slower wound closure (Fig. 4C-F). Consistently, similar results were obtained with the Transwell assay. STK17A overexpression significantly enhanced the migration ability of MKN45 and SNU1 cells (Fig. 4G), while STK17A knockdown in AGS and HGC27 cells suppressed their migration ability (Fig. 4H). Consistent with the aforementioned results, the western blot analysis results demonstrated that STK17A overexpression significantly increased the expression of N-cadherin and vimentin, but inhibited the expression of E-cadherin (Fig. 5A), while STK17A downregulation produced the opposite results, as predicted (Fig. 5B).

Discussion

With the continuous development of clinical diagnosis and treatment technology, the clinical prognosis of patients with GC has significantly improved. However, patients with the similar clinicopathological characteristics exhibit different clinical results when receiving the same therapy. Therefore, it is imperative to identify new biomarkers, which may accurately predict the prognosis of patients and develop individualized treatments for patients with GC.

The present study demonstrated that STK17A was upregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels in GC compared with adjacent normal gastric tissues. It was observed that the STK17A expression level was correlated with clinical and pathological factors, specifically tumor invasion depth and lymph node metastasis. On clinical outcome analysis, patients with STK17A overexpression exhibited significantly shorter survival and poorer prognosis. These data provided evidence that STK17A expression may be associated with the malignant biological behavior of GC, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of GC. Therefore, STK17A may be considered as a potential prognostic biomarker. It was demonstrated that GC patients with lymph node metastasis and greater depth of tumor invasion exhibited higher expression levels of STK17A, and these results suggested that STK17A may promote GC growth and metastasis. Furthermore, it was demonstrated through functional analysis that high STK17A expression enhanced the proliferation and migration of GC cells. In addition, mechanistic studies demonstrated that STK17A promoted GC migration via mediating EMT.

EMT has been reported to be an important process in tumor occurrence and metastasis. EMT is characterized by loss of epithelial marker expression, increased mesenchymal marker expression, and enhanced migratory and invasive cell behaviors (24). Consistently, in the present study, upregulation of STK17A inhibited the expression of the epithelial marker E-cadherin, while it enhanced the expression of the mesenchymal markers N-cadherin and vimentin. Furthermore, STK17A was shown to promote tumor cell invasion and motility by changing the cell-cell and cell-stroma interactions (25). It has been reported that EMT of GC cells may affect the pathogenesis of GC through the Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT, and HGF/c-Met signaling pathways, which provides an important approach to the study of the relationship between cell behavior and EMT (2628).

It was previously demonstrated that, in some tumor types, STK17A is considered to act as a tumor promoter: STK17A was revealed to promote glioblastoma cell proliferation, and its overexpression may be considered as a biomarker for advanced cervical cancer (8,29). However, it was also demonstrated that STK17A overexpression reduced cell proliferation in testicular and ovarian cancer (7). These results support the highly relevant specificity and dependence of STK17A function on cancer type. These effects may be closely associated with the p53-dependent signaling mechanism, as the study revealed that STK17A is one of the direct and DNA damage-inducible p53 target genes. Moreover, STK17A has functional and shared response elements upstream of the p53 pathway, which is involved in cell signal transduction (7,30). These findings provide new insight into the mechanism through which STK17A may promote GC cell proliferation.

There remains a limitation in this research. It has been demonstrated that STK17A has a close relationship with chemoresistance in ovarian cancer cells (6). Unfortunately, the association between STK17A and chemoresistance in GC has not been fully evaluated. This issue may be addressed in a future study.

In summary, STK17A was revealed to be upregulated in GC tissues in the present study, and high STK17A expression was significantly associated with clinical metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with GC. In addition, STK17A may promote cell proliferation and migration via regulation of EMT, thereby providing a potential therapeutic target for GC.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81872264).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

ZW, YQ and YJ conceived and designed the study. ZW, CW, LL and JQ performed the experiments and analyzed the data. LS, SL and LW collected the specimens and performed patient follow-up. ZW and CW wrote the paper. YQ, BJ and YJ reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content and edited the manuscript. ZW and CW performed the experiments required for revision. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent for the use of tissue samples was obtained from all patients or their legal guardians. The use of GC tissues by the present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A and Bray F: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. Feb 4–2021.(Online ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Cidon EU, Ellis SG, Inam Y, Adeleke S, Zarif S and Geldart T: Molecular targeted agents for gastric cancer: A step forward towards personalized therapy. Cancers (Basel). 5:64–91. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Steeg PS: Metastasis suppressors alter the signal transduction of cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 3:55–63. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Sanjo H, Kawai T and Akira S: DRAKs, novel serine/threonine kinases related to death-associated protein kinase that trigger apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 273:29066–29071. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Bialik S and Kimchi A: The death-associated protein kinases: Structure, function, and beyond. Annu Rev Biochem. 75:189–210. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Gao J, Liu D, Li J, Song Q and Wang Q: Effect of STK17A on the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to paclitaxel and carboplatin. Oncol Lett. 12:1107–1112. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Mao P, Hever MP, Niemaszyk LM, Haghkerdar JM, Yanco EG, Desai D, Beyrouthy MJ, Kerley-Hamilton JS, Freemantle SJ and Spinella MJ: Serine/threonine kinase 17A is a novel p53 target gene and modulator of cisplatin toxicity and reactive oxygen species in testicular cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 286:19381–19391. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Mao P, Hever-Jardine MP, Rahme GJ, Yang E, Tam J, Kodali A, Biswal B, Fadul CE, Gaur A, Israel MA and Spinella MJ: Serine/threonine kinase 17A is a novel candidate for therapeutic targeting in glioblastoma. PLoS One. 8:e818032013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Park Y, Kim W, Lee JM, Park J, Cho JK, Pang K, Lee J, Kim D, Park SW, Yang KM and Kim SJ: Cytoplasmic DRAK1 overexpressed in head and neck cancers inhibits TGF-β1 tumor suppressor activity by binding to Smad3 to interrupt its complex formation with Smad4. Oncogene. 34:5037–5045. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Short SP, Thompson JJ, Bilotta AJ, Chen X, Revetta FL, Washington MK and Williams CS: Serine threonine kinase 17A maintains the epithelial state in colorectal cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res. 17:882–894. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Wei W and Liu C: Prognostic and predictive roles of microRNA-411 and its target STK17A in evaluating radiotherapy efficacy and their effects on cell migration and invasion via the p53 signaling pathway in cervical cancer. Mol Med Rep. 21:267–281. 2020.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Temmerman K, Simon B and Wilmanns M: Structural and functional diversity in the activity and regulation of DAPK-related protein kinases. FEBS J. 280:5533–5350. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Wang WJ, Kuo JC, Yao CC and Chen RH: DAP-kinase induces apoptosis by suppressing integrin activity and disrupting matrix survival signals. J Cell Biol. 159:169–179. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Lin Y, Hupp TR and Stevens C: Death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) and signal transduction: Additional roles beyond cell death. FEBS J. 277:48–57. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Kiger AA, Baum B, Jones S, Jones MR, Coulson A, Echeverri C and Perrimon N: A functional genomic analysis of cell morphology using RNA interference. J Biol. 2:272003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Neubueser D and Hipfner DR: Overlapping roles of Drosophila Drak and Rok kinases in epithelial tissue morphogenesis. Mol Biol Cell. 21:2869–2879. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Robertson F, Pinal N, Fichelson P and Pichaud F: Atonal and EGFR signalling orchestrate rok- and Drak-dependent adherens junction remodelling during ommatidia morphogenesis. Development. 139:3432–3441. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Coleman ML, Sahai EA, Yeo M, Bosch M, Dewar A and Olson MF: Membrane blebbing during apoptosis results from caspase-mediated activation of ROCK I. Nat Cell Biol. 3:339–345. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Gilmore AP: Anoikis. Cell Death Differ. 12 (Suppl 2):S1473–S1477. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Tang H, Liu YJ, Liu M and Li X: Establishment and gene analysis of an oxaliplatin-resistant colon cancer cell line THC8307/L-OHP. Anticancer Drugs. 18:633–639. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL and Trotti A: AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th edition. New York NY: Springer; 2010

22 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Li Y, Nie CJ, Hu L, Qin Y, Liu HB, Zeng TT, Chen L, Fu L, Deng W, Chen SP, et al: Characterization of a novel mechanism of genomic instability involving the SEI1/SET/NM23H1 pathway in esophageal cancers. Cancer Res. 70:5695–5705. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Kalluri R and Weinberg RA: The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 119:1420–1428. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Inoue T, Umezawa A, Takenaka T, Suzuki H and Okada H: The contribution of epithelial-mesenchymal transition to renal fibrosis differs among kidney disease models. Kidney Int. 87:233–238. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Chen DH, Yu JW and Jiang BJ: Contactin 1: A potential therapeutic target and biomarker in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 21:9707–9716. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Lamouille S, Xu J and Derynck R: Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 15:178–196. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Mesteri I, Schoppmann SF, Preusser M and Birner P: Overexpression of CMET is associated with signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation and diminished prognosis in oesophageal adenocarcinoma but not in squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 50:1354–1360. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Thomas A, Mahantshetty U, Kannan S, Deodhar K, Shrivastava SK, Kumar-Sinha C and Mulherkar R: Expression profiling of cervical cancers in Indian women at different stages to identify gene signatures during progression of the disease. Cancer Med. 2:836–648. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Cekirge HS, Peynircioglu B and Saatci I: Endovascular treatment of an ‘anterior cerebral artery’ aneurysm in a patient with ‘embryonic unfused middle cerebral artery’ anomaly: A case report. Neuroradiology. 47:690–694. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2021
Volume 45 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang Z, Wang C, Jiang B, Shi L, Lin S, Wang L, Liu L, Qiu J, Qin Y, Jia Y, Jia Y, et al: Predictive significance of STK17A in patients with gastric cancer and association with gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration. Oncol Rep 45: 119, 2021.
APA
Wang, Z., Wang, C., Jiang, B., Shi, L., Lin, S., Wang, L. ... Jia, Y. (2021). Predictive significance of STK17A in patients with gastric cancer and association with gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration. Oncology Reports, 45, 119. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2021.8070
MLA
Wang, Z., Wang, C., Jiang, B., Shi, L., Lin, S., Wang, L., Liu, L., Qiu, J., Qin, Y., Jia, Y."Predictive significance of STK17A in patients with gastric cancer and association with gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration". Oncology Reports 45.6 (2021): 119.
Chicago
Wang, Z., Wang, C., Jiang, B., Shi, L., Lin, S., Wang, L., Liu, L., Qiu, J., Qin, Y., Jia, Y."Predictive significance of STK17A in patients with gastric cancer and association with gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration". Oncology Reports 45, no. 6 (2021): 119. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2021.8070