Comparison of hexamethylhypericin and tetrabromohypericin to hypericin for their in vivo efficacy as PDT tools

  • Authors:
    • Els Delaey
    • István Zupko
    • Bin Chen
    • Annelies Derycke
    • Frederik Van Laar
    • Dirk De Vos
    • Peter De Witte
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 1, 2003     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.23.2.519
  • Pages: 519-524
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study was performed to evaluate the PDT efficacy, the singlet oxygen yield, and the plasma binding profile of the natural photosensitizer hypericin and two hypericin derivatives, hexamethylhypericin and tetrabromohypericin. All compounds exhibited an excellent 1O2 quantum yield, as documented by TEMP spin trapping experiments. The efficacy of PDT with the different compounds using a P388 lymphoma tumour model was clearly dependent on the interval between drug administration and light irradiation of the tumours. The most effective PDT treatment time was obtained with hypericin (5 mg/kg) using a 30-min drug-light interval, whereas a 24-h interval was optimal for a similar dose of tetrabromohypericin. No significant difference in survival between control animals and animals treated with PDT using tetrabromohypericin (5 mg/kg) was noted when a 30-min, 2- or 6-h interval was used. PDT with hexamethylhypericin (5 mg/kg) using different drug-light intervals was unable to prolong the life span of the tumour-bearing mice. In contrast, a dose of 20 mg/kg hexamethylhypericin, especially when administered 30 min prior to light exposure, produced a profound local reduction of tumour mass and a concomitant significant increase in survival time. The binding of the hypericins to human plasma was evaluated using density-gradient ultracentrifugation. It was found that tetrabromohypericin exhibits an affinity for plasma constituents almost similar to hypericin, in contrast to the more hydrophilic hexamethylhypericin that mainly binds to heavy proteins (e.g. albumin). Since the latter compound showed an efficacy profile similar to hypericin, no correlation could be found between the optimal drug-light interval and the plasma protein binding of the compounds.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August 2003
Volume 23 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Delaey E, Zupko I, Chen B, Derycke A, Van Laar F, De Vos D and De Witte P: Comparison of hexamethylhypericin and tetrabromohypericin to hypericin for their in vivo efficacy as PDT tools. Int J Oncol 23: 519-524, 2003.
APA
Delaey, E., Zupko, I., Chen, B., Derycke, A., Van Laar, F., De Vos, D., & De Witte, P. (2003). Comparison of hexamethylhypericin and tetrabromohypericin to hypericin for their in vivo efficacy as PDT tools. International Journal of Oncology, 23, 519-524. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.23.2.519
MLA
Delaey, E., Zupko, I., Chen, B., Derycke, A., Van Laar, F., De Vos, D., De Witte, P."Comparison of hexamethylhypericin and tetrabromohypericin to hypericin for their in vivo efficacy as PDT tools". International Journal of Oncology 23.2 (2003): 519-524.
Chicago
Delaey, E., Zupko, I., Chen, B., Derycke, A., Van Laar, F., De Vos, D., De Witte, P."Comparison of hexamethylhypericin and tetrabromohypericin to hypericin for their in vivo efficacy as PDT tools". International Journal of Oncology 23, no. 2 (2003): 519-524. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.23.2.519