TNFAIP3 overexpression is an independent factor for poor survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
- Authors:
- Published online on: February 9, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.3869
- Pages: 1002-1010
Abstract
Introduction
Esophageal cancer is a serious malignancy and the eighth most common cancer worldwide, with an estimated 456,000 new cases, and the sixth most common cause of death from cancer with an estimated 400,000 deaths in 2012 (1). The global incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was 5.2 per 100,000 in the same year. Approximately 80% of cases of global ESCC occurred in the Central and East Asian region (2). The overall 5-year survival rate for ESCC ranges from 15 to 25% (3). Biomarker discovery for the malignancy could potentially lead to earlier diagnosis as well as allowing the monitoring of cancer recurrence (4).
Tumor necrosis factor α induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3 or A20) was first identified as a gene that is activated in response to TNFα in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (5). TNFAIP3 protein is composed of seven Cys2/Cys2 zinc-fingers (ZnFs) (6) that are induced by TNF-mediated NF-κB activation (7), and has a dual-function as a ubiquitin-editing enzyme to regulate NF-κB through several molecules involved in the NF-κB pathway (8,9).
TNFAIP3 was originally characterized as a protein that protects cells from the cytotoxic effect of TNF (10), and regulates TNF receptor signals by interactions with TNF receptor-associated factor-2 (11), interleukin 1, A20 binding inhibitor of NF-κB activation (ABIN) (12), inhibitor of NF-κB kinase γ (13), and stress-activated protein kinase (14). TNFAIP3 was also demonstrated to interact with TXBP151 protein to mediate the anti-apoptotic process through cleavage of caspase-3, -6 and -7 (15), suggesting that overexpression of TNFAIP3 is correlated with inflammatory and malignant diseases (16).
Recently, we reported the correlation of TNFAIP8 overexpression and cancer progression and poor prognosis in ESCC clinical samples. TNFAIP8 was also demonstrated as an effective therapeutic target for ESCC. TNFAIP8 is an apoptosis regulator and contains a death-effector domain that is also induced by NF-κB activation (17). Although TNFAIP3 and −8 have a different mechanism, both were reported to play a role in multiple myeloma (18). As with TNFAIP8, TNFAIP3 may also be a promising therapeutic target for malignant diseases.
Overexpression of TNFAIP3 was also found in breast tumor (19), pancreatic cancer (20), hepatocellular carcinoma (21) and bladder cancer (22). Also, single nucleotide polymorphisms in TNFAIP3 (TNFAIP3-SNPs) were reported to be associated with advanced disease stage and survival in surgically-treated esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (23). However, the clinical study and function of TNFAIP3 in malignant disease is very limited, especially in ESCC. In this study, we evaluated the correlation between TNFAIP3 expression and cancer progression in ESCC clinical samples. We also investigated the TNFAIP3 function in ESCC cells in vitro.
Materials and methods
Patients and specimens
Surgical specimens for immunohistochemical (IHC) study were obtained from 149 ESCC patients (134 males and 15 females) who underwent potentially curative surgery; no evidence of residual tumors and the resected margins were free of tumors by microscopic examination (R0) at the Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, between 2000 and 2010, after obtaining written informed consent. The patients were aged from 41 to 83 years (mean, 64.1 years). Tumor stage and disease grade of clinical samples were classified according to the 6th edition of the TNM classification of the International union against Cancer (UICC). The tumor differentiation evaluation was based on the histological criteria outlined by the Japanese Society for Esophageal Disease.
Surgical specimens for RNA samples were obtained from 83 ESCC patients (72 males and 11 females) that were a subset of IHC samples. The patients were aged from 42 to 83 years (mean, 65.2 years). Normal tissues were obtained far from the margin of the cancer in surgical specimens. All specimens for RNA extraction were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction.
None of the patients had received radiotherapy or chemotherapy prior to surgery, nor did any have hematogenous metastases at the time of surgery. Patients who had undergone non-curative surgery and/or who had received inadequate follow-up were excluded from the study.
Immunohistochemistry
Resected specimens were fixed with 10% formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin blocks, cut into 4 µm thick sections, and mounted onto platinum pro-micro slide glass (Matsunami Glass Ind., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). We examined sections containing portions of both tumor and its normal esophageal epithelium as inner control. Each section was deparaffinized, rehydrated, and incubated with fresh 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min at room temperature to block endogenous peroxidase activity. After being rehydrated through a graded series of ethanol concentrations, the sections were autoclaved in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 120°C for 2 min and then cooled to 30°C. After rinsing the sections in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4), non-specific binding sites were blocked by incubation with 10% normal goat serum for 30 min. The sections were then incubated at 4°C overnight with rabbit anti-TNFAIP3 polyclonal antibody (1:150; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin. Negative controls were obtained by absence of the specific primary antibody. The sections were then washed in PBS and incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG for 30 min at room temperature. IHC was performed using a Histofine streptavidin-biotin peroxidase (SAB-PO) complex solution kit (Nichirei Co., Tokyo, Japan). The sections were then lightly counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin and mounted.
The intensity and area of TNFAIP3 staining in tumor tissues was scored between 0–3, as follows; 0, no staining, 0%; 1, weak, <30%; 2, moderate, 30–60%; and 3, strong intensity, >60%. Low TNFAIP3 expression was scored 0–1, while high TNFAIP3 expression was 2–3. TNFAIP3 staining evaluation was performed by three experienced researchers well trained in pathology, in a blinded manner; i.e., they did not have any knowledge of the clinical or pathological backgrounds of the patients, or the assessment of each other.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR
Total RNA was extracted from the tissue and cells using the RNeasy plus Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The quantity of isolated RNA was measured using a ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). cDNA for TNFAIP3 mRNA quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was synthesized from 1 µg total RNA with the Omniscript Reverse Transcriptase kit (Qiagen) in a reaction volume of 20 µl (60 min at 37°C and 5 min at 93°C before being put on ice). The TNFAIP3-specific oligonucleotide primers were designed as follows: TNFAIP3 forward, 5′-TGCACACTGTGTTTCATCGAC-3′; reverse, 5′-ACGCTGTGGGACTGACTTTC-3′. GAPDH (258 bp) forward, 5′-AAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTCAAC-3′; reverse, 5′-CTTGATTTTGGAGGGATCTCG-3′. PCR amplification to quantify the levels of TNFAIP3 and GAPDH mRNA in the clinical samples was performed using a Light cycler 480 Real-Time PCR system and the LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master kit (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). The amplification conditions consisted of initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 sec, annealing at 60°C for 10 sec, and elongation at 65°C for 10 sec. All of the samples, expression of TNFAIP3 mRNA was calculated by dividing the quantity of TNFAIP3 mRNA with the quantity of GAPDH mRNA. To investigate the correlation of TNFAIP3 mRNA expression levels with clinicopathological features, we divided the tumor TNFAIP3 mRNA expression value with the corresponding non-cancerous ones in each samples. The results of samples with TNFAIP3 mRNA expression value higher than the median value of all samples was considered high expression, while that lower than the median value was low expression.
Cell lines
Four esophageal cancer cell lines were established from squamous cell carcinoma KYSE-70, TE-1, TE-8, TE-15 cell lines, and the non-cancerous immortalized esophageal cell line Het-1A, was used. Het-1A, TE-1, TE-8, TE-15 and KYSE-70 cells were provided from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA), JCRB Cell Bank, and RIKEN BioResource Center (Ibaraki, Japan) through the National Bio-Resource Project of the MEXT, Japan. TE-1, and TE-15 cells are well-differentiated ESCC primary lesion cells, TE-8 cells are moderately differentiated ESCC primary lesion cells, while KYSE-70 cells are from a poorly-differentiated ESCC sample. All cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Wako, Osaka, Japan) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin). The cells were cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C.
Western blot analyses
Het-1A, KYSE-70, TE-1, TE-8 and TE-15 cells (1×106 cell/ml) were washed twice in ice-cold medium and cell lysates were prepared after solubilizing cells with PRO-PREP Protein Extraction Solution (iNtRON Biotechnology, Gyeonggi-do, Korea). Protein concentrations of the lysates were determined with a Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Forty microgram of each extract was subjected to electrophoresis on a NuPAGE Novex 4–20% Bis-Tris gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the proteins were electrotransferred to a Hybond ECL (7×8 cm) membrane (GE Life Science Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). The membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit polyclonal antibody against TNFAIP3 (1:1,000; Abcam) and mouse monoclonal antibody against β-actin (1:2,000; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Bands on the membrane were detected using an Image Quant LAS4000 (GE Life Science) with the aid of an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system.
Small interfering RNA
TNFAIP3 small interfering RNA (siRNA) (hTNFAIP3_#1: sense 5′-CAAAGUUGGAUGAAGCUAAtt and antisense 5′-UUAGCUUCAUCCAACUUUGtt, hTNFAIP3_#2: sense 5′-GCACCAUGUUUGAAGGAUAtt and antisense 5′-UAUCCUUCAAACAUGGUGCtt and hTNFAIP3_#3: sense 5′-GAGCAGGAGAGGAAAGAUAtt and antisense 5′-UAUCUUUCCUCUCCUGCUCtt) siRNAs were purchased from GeneDesign (Osaka, Japan). TE-15 cells were seeded in 6-well flat-bottomed microtiter plates at a density of 1.5×105 cells per well in a volume of 2 ml and incubated in a humidified atmosphere (37°C and 5% CO2). After incubation, TE-15 cells were treated with siRNAs according to the manufacturer's instructions to final concentration 30 nM per well, by adding Opti-MEM I Reduced-Serum Medium liquid (Thermo Fisher Scientific) mixed with Lipofectamine RNAi MAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The experiments were then performed after 48 h incubation.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation analysis was performed using TE-15 cells transfected with TNFAIP3 siRNA; 100 µl of a cell suspension (1×104 cells) was seeded into each well of a 96-well plate (Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and incubated at 37°C overnight. Cell viability was determined using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Proliferation index were assessed as absorbance at 450 nm (OD450) the reference wavelength at 620 nm was read and the results were derived from three sets of triplicate experiments.
Wound healing assay
To determine the effect of TNFAIP3 on esophageal cell migration, a wound-healing assay was performed in TE-15 cells transfected with TNFAIP3 siRNAs. The cells were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated until 80% confluence. A wound was made through the monolayer using a sterile 200 µl pipette tip and cell debris removed by washing the cells with PBS three times. Wounds were observed under a microscope and measured over a time course to calculate the migration rate according to the following formula: percentage wound healing for 24 and 48 h = [(wound length at 0 h) − (wound length at 24 or 48 h)]/(wound length at 0 h) × 100. The experiments were performed three times with triplicate samples.
Cell invasion assay
Cell invasion was examined using the BD BioCoat Matrigel invasion chamber (8.0 µm, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Five hundred microliter containing 2.5×104 TE-15 cells transfected with TNFAIP3 siRNA were added to each invasion chamber. After incubation for 12 h, the cells were stained with a Diff-Quick kit (Sysmex Corp., Kobe, Japan), and then observed and counted under the microscope. The parental groups were used for normalization. All samples were tested twice in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
The χ2 test and t-test were used to assess the statistical significance of the correlations between TNFAIP3 expression and clinicopathological parameters. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for disease-specific survival. In addition, univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using Cox's proportional hazards regression model. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP5.0 software (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant when the P-value was <0.05.
Results
TNFAIP3 protein and mRNA expression levels in ESCC tissue samples
In normal esophageal epithelium, expression of TNFAIP3 was low in the basal layer of the epithelium (Fig. 1A). TNFAIP3 expression was localized in the cytoplasmic components of tumor cells (Fig. 1B and D). The expression of TNFAIP3 was investigated by IHC in 149 ESCC specimens, and we found that TNFAIP3 protein expression was high in 71 specimens (47.65%).
TNFAIP3 high expression is correlated with differentiation of ESCC pathological features in protein level, but not in mRNA level
The correlations between TNFAIP3 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of ESCC patients (age, gender, differentiation, TNM stage, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion) that were investigated by IHC are shown in Table I. A significant correlation between TNFAIP3 expression and tumor differentiation status (P=0.041) was identified, whereas there were no significant correlation between TNFAIP3 expression and age (P=0.137), or gender (P=0.935), TNM stage (P=0.603), tumor depth (P=0.381), lymph node metastasis (P=0.534), distant metastasis (P=0.299), lymphatic invasion (P=0.391), or venous invasion (P=0.075). However, no significant correlations were found between TNFAIP3 mRNA expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of ESCC patients or patient survival rates (data not shown).
TNFAIP3 high expression is correlated with poor survival as independent factor
The disease-specific survival rate of the ESCC patients with high TNFAIP3 expression was significantly poorer than that of the patients with low TNFAIP3 expression (P=0.025; Fig. 2). In univariate analysis, high TNFAIP3 expression was found to be a significant prognostic factor for poor survival, in addition to tumor depth, the presence of lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis (cervical lymph node metastasis, not distant organ metastasis), lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. Moreover, multivariate analysis of the six factors revealed that the presence of distant metastasis was significant (P=0.008) and showed that positive TNFAIP3 expression was an independent prognostic factor (P=0.021; Table II).
TNFAIP3 mRNA expression in ESCC tissues was significantly higher than in non-cancerous tissue
Whereas, TNFAIP3 mRNA expression was determined in clinical samples from 83 patients using real-time RT-PCR, and 53 patients (63.85%) showed higher TNFAIP3 mRNA expression levels in their ESCC tissue specimens (Fig. 3). The mean TNFAIP3 mRNA level in the ESCC tissue was significantly higher than that in the corresponding non-cancerous tissue (P=0.027).
Expression of TNFAIP3 protein in ESCC cells and noncancerous immortalized esophageal cells and knockdown of TNFAIP3 in TE-15 cells
We examined TNFAIP3 protein expression in four ESCC cell lines (KYSE70, TE-1, TE-8 and TE-15) and the non-cancerous immortalized esophageal cell line Het-1A. TNFAIP3 protein was expressed at low levels in Het-1A and TE-8 cells, whereas it was moderately expressed in KYSE70 and TE-1 cells and showed extremely high expression in TE-15 cells (Fig. 4A). Based on these results, we used TE-15 cells to analyze cell behavior following knockdown of TNFAIP3.
To determine the contribution of high expression levels of TNFAIP3 in ESCC cells, we used siRNA to knock down TNFAIP3 expression in TE-15 cancer cells. The suppression of TNFAIP3 by siRNAs was checked using western blotting (Fig. 4B). Since TNFAIP3 siRNA3 did not show any significant reduction, we used TNFAIP3 siRNA1 and siRNA2 for the subsequent analysis.
Depletion of TNFAIP3 expression inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and invasion
TE-15 cells treated with TNFAIP3 siRNA1 and siRNA2 showed a significant reduction in their cell proliferation rate compared with cells transfected with the negative control siRNA and the parental group (Fig. 5).
A significant reduction in cell migration ability was demonstrated in TE-15 cells that were treated with TNFAIP3 siRNA1 and siRNA2 compared with cells transfected with the negative control siRNA and the parental group (Fig. 6).
The weakening of the cell ability to invade was shown in TE-15 cells treated with TNFAIP3 siRNA1 and siRNA2 compared with cells transfected with the negative control siRNA and the parental group (Fig. 7). Based on the in vitro experiment results above, the depletion of TNFAIP3 protein expression seems to decrease cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion ability.
Discussion
In the present study, we found that high expression of TNFAIP3 in ESCC clinical samples was significantly correlated with tumor differentiation that is associated with tumor growth and spread. The disease-specific survival rates of patient with high TNFAIP3 expression were significantly poorer than those of patients with low TNFAIP3. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that positive TNFAIP3 expression was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival. According to clinical results, we investigated whether the TNFAIP3 overexpression accelerate tumor growth and spread enhancing the ability of tumor cells to migrate and invade. In vitro analysis showed that proliferation, migration and invasion were significantly reduced following TNFAIP3 siRNA knockdown compared with the control groups. Our results indicated that TNFAIP3 plays a role in enhancing the ability of cells to expand, that might be the reason why of the tumor appears to grow slowly in the primary tumor, but actually tumor cells migrate to other organs.
TNFAIP3 is an anti-inflammatory signaling molecule that was reported to protect cells from cytotoxic effects (10). Since TNFAIP3 was found to regulate NF-κB signaling through ubiquitination to form germline polymorphisms and somatic mutations, TNFAIP3 has been linked to multiple diseases. TNFAIP3-SNPs that might reduce TNFAIP3 function and expression were linked with multiple inflammatory diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and type 1 diabetes (16). TNFAIP3 with missense mutations was reported in breast cancer cells at 14-3-3 binding sites by changing the crucial serine residue to arginine (24). TNFAIP3 mutations cause overexpression and confer an anti-apoptotic function on TNFAIP3 to mediate RIP1 ubiquitination and hence inhibit caspase-8 cleavage in hepatocellular carcinoma cells (21). In endothelial cells, TNFAIP3 overexpression was showed to restrict TNF- and FAS-induced apoptosis by preventing subsequent activation of the apical caspases-8 and -2 to the downstream effectors (25). High TNFAIP3 expression caused by TNFAIP3 mutations were also reported in glioma stem cells (26). However, no study has been reported on high expression of TNFAIP3 associated with mutations in ESCC.
A previous study reported that germline TNFAIP3-SNPs in esophageal cancer had a relationship with AJCC disease stages, lymph node metastasis, and recurrence (23); however, in the present study, the overexpression of TNFAIP3 protein was correlated with differentiation. TNFAIP3 expression was high in well-differentiated ESCC and low in poorly and moderately differentiated cancer in the present study. This finding was reinforced by the findings in vitro that showed high TNFAIP3 expression was found in TE-15 cells, which are well-differentiated ESCC cells. Although these studies are different, the prediction obtained from previous studies demonstrated that TNFAIP3 regulates NF-κB signaling (8,16), with downstream effects on TGF-β signaling (27) and Wnt/β-catenin signaling (28), to influence tumor differentiation. However, for details of the mechanism further investigation is required.
In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, TNFAIP3 was expressed in poorly differentiated and undifferentiated, but not in well-differentiated cancers in mRNA level (29). However, there was no significance difference between TNFAIP3 mRNA levels and clinicopathological factors in this study, including tumor differentiation. Nonetheless, TNFAIP3 protein expression has a relationship with clinicopathological factors such as tumor differentiation. A previous study reported that a truncation mutant form of TNFAIP3 containing four ZnFs is responsible for the ubiquitination that can regulate TNFAIP3 protein expression levels (6). TNFAIP3 consists of two ubiquitin-editing domains, an N-terminal deubiquitinating domain of the ovarian tumor (OTU) family and a C-terminal ubiquitin ligase domain. In a previous study, the N terminal domain was shown to deubiquitinate K63-polyubiquitinated RIP1. The C-terminal ZnF-containing domain functions as a ubiquitin ligase that catalyzes K48-linked RIP1, targeting RIP1 for proteasomal degradation. Wild-type TNFAIP3 disassembles K63-linked ubiquitin chains on RIP1 and increases K48-linked RIP1 ubiquitination. Furthermore, TNFAIP3 with a ZnF4 mutation at the OTU-domain inhibits the disassembling of K63-linked ubiquitin chains on RIP1 and diminishes the ability of TNFAIP3 to ubiquitinate RIP1 with K48-linked ubiquitin chains (8,9). The dual-ubiquitination of mutant TNFAIP3 is predicted to cause differences in TNFAIP3 mRNA and protein expression levels in our study (16).
TNFAIP3-SNP was also found to be an independent prognostic factor, but AC and CC genotypes had a relationship with disease-free and overall survival in esophageal cancer (23). Even though it is not on the same condition that deserves to be compared, the present study revealed that TNFAIP3 was found to be an independent prognostic factor, and ESCC patients with high expression of TNFAIP3 had significantly poorer disease-specific survival than those patients with low expression ones. Although TNFAIP3 was not significantly correlated with metastases (lymph node and distant) or invasion (lymphatic and venous) in ESCC clinicopathological features, but in multivariate analysis TNFAIP3 showed significance (P=0.021) after distant metastases (P=0.008). Since activation of JAK/STAT pathway is predicted to play roles in malignancies, including tumor proliferation, invasion and metastases, activation of STAT3 was also considered a responsible mechanism for TNFAIP3 becoming an independent prognostic factor in the present study (30). According to a previous study, SNPs of TNFAIP3 in the C-allele and alteration of the binding of transcription factors reduce TNFAIP3 expression (16). It means this study results would be reasonable if that happens is the opposite of the previous results studied in TNFAIP3-SNP.
From our clinicopathological result in patients with ESCC, we expected that TNFAIP3 plays a role in cell growth and spread in ESCC. In breast cancer, overexpression of TNFAIP3 induced cell proliferation (19), consistent with a study of hepatocellular carcinoma cells that were reported with increased proliferation of TNFAIP3-overexpressing cells. So it is reasonable when in the present study, the depletion of TNFAIP3 expression in TE-15 cells resulted in a significant reduction in cell proliferation. These results suggest that TNFAIP3 plays a role in the regulation of cell proliferation. Based on a previous study, the mechanism of ABIN is by mimicking NF-κB and combined with TNFAIP3 inhibiting bond formation of TNFAIP3 and NF-κB that cause apoptosis occurrence (12). Different from ABIN mechanism, TNFAIP3 depletion lead to inhibit cell proliferation through attenuation of TNFAIP3 that increased SOCS3 expression, which inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation and suppressed cell proliferation. Because, overexpression of TNFAIP3 regulated lipopolysaccharide/TNF-induced IL-6 inhibition and induced STAT3 phosphorylation. Thus, high and sustained STAT3 phosphorylation induced cell proliferation (30). Moreover, when combined with cisplatin, IC50 of cisplatin in TE-15 cells is more cytotoxic compared with combination of cisplatin and TNFAIP3 siRNA treated TE-15 cells (data not shown).
Even though there are no previous reports describing the relationship between TNFAIP3 and the invasive or migratory ability of cancer cells, one study demonstrated microbial invasion of the intestinal inner mucus layer in TNFAIP3 transgenic mice (31). Another report showed that TNFAIP3 influenced the ability of intestinal cell migration in TNFAIP3 knockout mice (32). The present study demonstrated that the invasive and migratory ability of TE-15 cells in the TNFAIP3 siRNA groups were significantly reduced. Suppression of TNFAIP3 protein inhibits activation of NF-κB, which inhibits the activation of IFNα/STAT1 signaling (32) then resulting in a reduction of cell migration ability.
Clinical report of the TNFAIP3 overexpression is limited. The finding of TNFAIP3 affects in migration and invasion of esophageal cancer cells is a novelty of this study. Investigation to identify a suitable mechanism for cancer therapy is now in progress in order to apply this biomarker into a novel therapy against malignant disease. Furthermore, study that describes TNFAIP3 expression in patients with therapy adjuvant is required in future research.
Our data implied that the expression of TNFAIP3 in ESCC cancer tissues was significantly higher compared with the normal esophageal epithelial tissues, and was significantly correlated with tumor differentiation and found to be an independent prognostic marker for disease survival in ESCC. Our TNFAIP3 knockdown data demonstrated that TNFAIP3 expression may relate, not only to proliferation, but also to migration and invasion in ESCC cells. Taken together, these results suggest that TNFAIP3 could be used as a promising marker for diagnosis and as an effective therapeutic target for ESCC in the future.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS no. 22591450).
Glossary
Abbreviations
Abbreviations:
ESCC |
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma |
TNFAIP3 |
tumor necrosis factor α induced protein 3 |
ZnF |
zinc-finger |
ABIN |
A20 binding inhibitor of NF-κB activation |
TNFAIP3-SNPs |
TNFAIP3 in single nucleotide polymorphisms |
IHC |
immunohistochemical |
UICC |
International Union against Cancer |
RT-PCR |
reverse transcriptase PCR |
siRNA |
small-interfering RNA |
OTU |
ovarian tumor |
References
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D and Bray F: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 136:E359–E386. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Arnold M, Soerjomataram I, Ferlay J and Forman D: Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012. Gut. 64:381–387. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA and Luketich JD: Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet. 381:400–412. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Napier KJ, Scheerer M and Misra S: Esophageal cancer: A review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, staging workup and treatment modalities. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 6:112–120. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dixit VM, Green S, Sarma V, Holzman LB, Wolf FW, O'Rourke K, Ward PA, Prochownik EV and Marks RM: Tumor necrosis factor-α induction of novel gene products in human endothelial cells including a macrophage-specific chemotaxin. J Biol Chem. 265:2973–2978. 1990.PubMed/NCBI | |
Opipari AW Jr, Boguski MS and Dixit VM: The A20 cDNA induced by tumor necrosis factor α encodes a novel type of zinc finger protein. J Biol Chem. 265:14705–14708. 1990.PubMed/NCBI | |
Krikos A, Laherty CD and Dixit VM: Transcriptional activation of the tumor necrosis factor α-inducible zinc finger protein, A20, is mediated by kappa B elements. J Biol Chem. 267:17971–17976. 1992.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wertz IE, O'Rourke KM, Zhou H, Eby M, Aravind L, Seshagiri S, Wu P, Wiesmann C, Baker R, Boone DL, et al: De-ubiquitination and ubiquitin ligase domains of A20 downregulate NF-kappaB signalling. Nature. 430:694–699. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bosanac I, Wertz IE, Pan B, Yu C, Kusam S, Lam C, Phu L, Phung Q, Maurer B, Arnott D, et al: Ubiquitin binding to A20 ZnF4 is required for modulation of NF-κB signaling. Mol Cell. 40:548–557. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Opipari AW Jr, Hu HM, Yabkowitz R and Dixit VM: The A20 zinc finger protein protects cells from tumor necrosis factor cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem. 267:12424–12427. 1992.PubMed/NCBI | |
Song HY, Rothe M and Goeddel DV: The tumor necrosis factor-inducible zinc finger protein A20 interacts with TRAF1/TRAF2 and inhibits NF-kappaB activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:6721–6725. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Heyninck K, De Valck D, Vanden Berghe W, Van Criekinge W, Contreras R, Fiers W, Haegeman G and Beyaert R: The zinc finger protein A20 inhibits TNF-induced NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression by interfering with an RIP- or TRAF2-mediated transactivation signal and directly binds to a novel NF-kappaB-inhibiting protein ABIN. J Cell Biol. 145:1471–1482. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang SQ, Kovalenko A, Cantarella G and Wallach D: Recruitment of the IKK signalosome to the p55 TNF receptor: RIP and A20 bind to NEMO (IKKgamma) upon receptor stimulation. Immunity. 12:301–311. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lee EG, Boone DL, Chai S, Libby SL, Chien M, Lodolce JP and Ma A: Failure to regulate TNF-induced NF-kappaB and cell death responses in A20-deficient mice. Science. 289:2350–2354. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De Valck D, Jin DY, Heyninck K, Van de Craen M, Contreras R, Fiers W, Jeang KT and Beyaert R: The zinc finger protein A20 interacts with a novel anti-apoptotic protein which is cleaved by specific caspases. Oncogene. 18:4182–4190. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ma A and Malynn BA: A20: Linking a complex regulator of ubiquitylation to immunity and human disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 12:774–785. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hadisaputri YE, Miyazaki T, Suzuki S, Yokobori T, Kobayashi T, Tanaka N, Inose T, Sohda M and Kuwano H: TNFAIP8 overexpression: Clinical relevance to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 19(Suppl 3): S589–S596. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang MC, Liu SX and Liu PB: Gene expression profile of multiple myeloma cell line treated by realgar. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 25:243–249. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Vendrell JA, Ghayad S, Ben-Larbi S, Dumontet C, Mechti N and Cohen PA: A20/TNFAIP3, a new estrogen-regulated gene that confers tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 26:4656–4667. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang Q, Yuan L, Liu Z, Yin J, Jiang X and Lu J: Expression of A20 is reduced in pancreatic cancer tissues. J Mol Histol. 43:319–325. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dong B, Lv G, Wang Q, Wei F, Bellail AC, Hao C and Wang G: Targeting A20 enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 418:433–438. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang M and Li S: Bladder polypoid cystitis-derived A20 associates with tumorigenesis. Cell Biochem Biophys. 67:669–673. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ghadban T, Schmidt-Yang M, Uzunoglu FG, Perez DR, Tsui TY, El gammal AT, Erbes PJ, Zilbermints V, Wellner U, Pantel K, et al: An A/C germline single-nucleotide polymorphism in the TNFAIP3 gene is associated with advanced disease stage and survival in only surgically treated esophageal cancer. J Hum Genet. 59:661–666. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lademann U, Kallunki T and Jäättelä M: A20 zinc finger protein inhibits TNF-induced apoptosis and stress response early in the signaling cascades and independently of binding to TRAF2 or 14-3-3 proteins. Cell Death Differ. 8:265–272. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Daniel S, Arvelo MB, Patel VI, Longo CR, Shrikhande G, Shukri T, Mahiou J, Sun DW, Mottley C, Grey ST, et al: A20 protects endothelial cells from TNF-, Fas-, and NK-mediated cell death by inhibiting caspase 8 activation. Blood. 104:2376–2384. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hjelmeland AB, Wu Q, Wickman S, Eyler C, Heddleston J, Shi Q, Lathia JD, Macswords J, Lee J, McLendon RE, et al: Targeting A20 decreases glioma stem cell survival and tumor growth. PLoS Biol. 8:e10003192010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun X, Chen E, Dong R, Chen W and Hu Y: Nuclear factor (NF)-κB p65 regulates differentiation of human and mouse lung fibroblasts mediated by TgF-β. Life Sci. 122:8–14. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Murtas D, Maric D, De Giorgi V, Reinboth J, Worschech A, Fetsch P, Filie A, Ascierto ML, Bedognetti D, Liu Q, et al: IRF-1 responsiveness to IFN-γ predicts different cancer immune phenotypes. Br J Cancer. 109:76–82. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Codd JD, Salisbury JR, Packham G and Nicholson LJ: A20 RNA expression is associated with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma and poorly differentiated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Pathol. 187:549–555. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
da Silva CG, Studer P, Skroch M, Mahiou J, Minussi DC, Peterson CR, Wilson SW, Patel VI, Ma A, Csizmadia E, et al: A20 promotes liver regeneration by decreasing SOCS3 expression to enhance IL-6/STAT3 proliferative signals. Hepatology. 57:2014–2025. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Murphy SF, Rhee L, Grimm WA, Weber CR, Messer JS, Lodolce JP, Chang JE, Bartulis SJ, Nero T, Kukla RA, et al: Intestinal epithelial expression of TNFAIP3 results in microbial invasion of the inner mucus layer and induces colitis in IL-10-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 307:G871–G882. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moll HP, Lee A, Minussi DC, da Silva CG, Csizmadia E, Bhasin M and Ferran C: A20 regulates atherogenic interferon (IFN)-γ signaling in vascular cells by modulating basal IFNβ levels. J Biol Chem. 289:30912–30924. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |