Open Access

FoxM1 overexpression promotes cell proliferation and migration and inhibits apoptosis in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma resulting in poor clinical prognosis

  • Authors:
    • Yan Chen
    • Yifei Liu
    • Haosheng Ni
    • Chuanjin Ding
    • Xiaobo Zhang
    • Zhenxin Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 9, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4094
  • Pages:1045-1054
  • Copyright: © Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: HTML 0 views | PDF 0 views
0

Abstract

Forkhead box M1 (FoxM1), a member of the Fox family of transcriptional factors, is involved in the development of various human malignancies. However, the expression level of FoxM1 and its functional role in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC) remained unclear to date. The aim of the present study was to investigate the FoxM1 expression in 63 HSCC and 20 adjacent normal tissues, as well as to evaluate its association with the clinicopathological parameters and its diagnostic value in HSCC. To further explore the biological function of FoxM1 in vitro, siRNAs were used to knockdown the expression of FoxM1 in the HSCC cell line Fadu. The results revealed that FoxM1 protein was highly expressed in HSCC tissues and that its high expression was closely associated with HSCC tumor differentiation (P=0.004), tumor size (P=0.002), clinical stage (P=0.001), lymph node metastasis (P=0.002), treatment (P=0.045) and expression of the proliferation marker Ki-67 (P<0.001). Additionally, the elevated expression of FoxM1 in HSCC patients consistently predicted a poor survival time. Knockdown of FoxM1 expression blocked Fadu cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis, and also led to the downregulation of cyclin A1 expression. Furthermore, decreased expression of FoxM1 markedly impeded cell migration and reversed the epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype, as indicated by decreased expression of vimentin and increased expression of E-cadherin in Fadu cells. These results indicate that FoxM1 may act as an oncogene and serve as a therapeutic target against malignant progression in HSCC.

Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common group of malignancies worldwide, and is generally classified into four independent types of cancer (1). Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC), which accounts for ~3–5% of all HNSCCs (2), has high rates of recurrence and poor survival rates, and is regarded as the most malignant form of HNSCC (3,4). At the time of diagnosis, ~80% of HSCC patients are at an advanced stage of disease. However, there is only limited understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms that lead to a highly malignant phenotype and ultimately result in the unfavorable prognosis in HSCC patients. Thus, it is urgent to investigate the pathogenesis of HSCC, to identify new biomarkers and explore innovative treatment strategies.

Tumor progression is a multistep process that involves multiple genes, including the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and the activation of oncogenes (5). Two important features that are directly related to the severity of tumors, including HSCC, are unlimited cellular proliferation and tumor metastasis, which can occur due to the aberrant expression of key regulators controlling cell proliferation, survival and motility (6). Forkhead box M1 (FoxM1), belongs to the Fox transcription factor family, which are characterized by the presence of a 'Forkhead box' or 'winged helix' DNA-binding domain. FoxM1 acts as a key regulator of the cell cycle by influencing the phase transitions from G1 to S and G2 to M (7,8). In addition, a previous study showed that FoxM1 acts as a regulator of a wide range of other biological processes, including apoptosis, migration and angiogenesis (9). It has been reported that a variety of tumors, such as gastric (10), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (11) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (12), exhibit increased expression of FoxM1. In addition, the elevated expression of FoxM1 is reported to be closely associated with poor prognosis in patients with certain types of malignant tumors, and is regarded as an independent predictor of poor survival in various solid tumors (1315). Additionally, it has been shown that decreased expression of FoxM1 leads to a reduction in the proliferation of breast tumor (16) and leukemia cells (17), and increased apoptosis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) cells (18). Crosstalk between the FoxM1/Cav-1 axis and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was demonstrated to be a critical molecular mechanism in regulating the metastasis of pancreatic cancer (19). Furthermore, Xue et al (20) have highlighted the critical interaction of FoxM1 and SMAD3 for controlling TGF-β signaling during breast cancer metastasis. Collectively, these findings suggest that FoxM1 may act as a promising therapeutic target in numerous types of human malignancies. To the best of our knowledge, there have so far been no reports on the expression and functional role of FoxM1 in HSCC.

The aim of the present study was to clarify the expression of FoxM1 in HSCC tissues, to determine the clinical significance of FoxM1 in primary HSCC, and to evaluate the relationship between the FoxM1 expression and the prognosis of HSCC patients. In addition, to assess the function of FoxM1 in HSCC cell lines, we examined the effects of siRNA-mediated FoxM1 suppression on the proliferation, apoptosis, migration and EMT in the human HSCC cell line Fadu in vitro.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue samples

A total of 7 fresh primary HSCC tumor tissues and 2 adjacent normal tissue samples were resected during surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (Nantong, China) between March 2015 and May 2016. None of the patients had received treatment prior to surgery. In addition, we retrospectively collected biopsy samples from 63 HSCC patients with complete clinical and pathological data and who had received primary treatment in our hospital between August 2009 and August 2016, during the same period, 20 adjacent normal tissue specimens were also collected. The detailed clinical characteristics of the 63 HSCC patients are summarized in Table I. Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were obtained and sectioned in the Department of Pathology. The follow-up time ranged from 3 to 71 months, with a median time of 22 months. The overall survival (OS) time was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of death or last follow-up. The disease-free survival (DFS) time was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of recurrence or last follow-up. The last follow-up of these patients was in November 2016. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and all patients provided written informed consent. The pathological samples were obtained from the surgically resected tissue specimens to avoid disadvantaging the health or prognosis of the patients, and the privacy of the patients' personal information was maintained.

Table I

The relationship between FoxM1 expression and clinicopathological factors in HSCC.

Table I

The relationship between FoxM1 expression and clinicopathological factors in HSCC.

Clinicopathological featuresNo. of casesFoxM1 expressionP-value
Age (years)0.851
 <60237.39±2.78
 ≥60407.54±3.21
Sex0.321
 Male35.00±3.46
 Female607.61±2.99
Differentiation0.004a
 High differentiation306.37±2.67
 Poor differentiation338.51±3.02
Tumor size (cm)0.002a
 ≤2256.08±2.70
 >2388.41±2.92
Clinical stage0.001a
 I–II205.65±2.73
 III–IV438.34±2.81
Lymph node metastasis0.002a
 Negative306.30±2.84
 Positive338.57±2.84
Treatment0.045b
 Surgery only296.64±2.91
 Surgery and radiation197.74±2.71
 Surgery, radiation, chemotherapy128.18±3.42
 Other treatment311.33±1.15
Ki-67 expression<0.001a
 Low expression265.35±2.01
 High expression378.99±2.73

a P<0.01;

b P<0.05.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections with a thickness of 4 µm were dried at 60°C for 8 h, followed by dewaxing in xylene, dehydration in a graded alcohol series, and washing in double-distilled water. After pretreatment in sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0, 30 min, at 100°C) to facilitate antigen retrieval, followed by natural cooling, endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% H2O2 (ZSGB-Bio, Beijing, China) for 15 min at room temperature away from light. Subsequently, the slides were incubated with 10% normal goat serum for 40 min. Primary antibodies against FoxM1 (1:100; Bioworld Technology, Inc., Nanjing, China) and Ki-67 (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) were applied overnight in a moist chamber at 4°C. After 20 h, the slides were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), then were incubated with a 2-step Plus Poly-HRP Anti-Mouse/Rabbit IgG detection system (ZSGB-Bio) at room temperature for 30 min. 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (ZSGB-Bio) was used for the visualization of immunoreactivity, which appeared as a pale brown color. Nuclei were stained blue with hematoxylin.

Immunostained tissue sections were reviewed and scored independently by two pathologists without knowledge of the patient characteristics. The percentage of staining and the staining intensity were recorded as follows: 0 (0–4%), 1 (5–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%) and 4 (76–100%); and 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate) and 3 (strong). The products of these two scores were used as the final staining scores (ranging from 0 to 12). According to the final score, the expression levels of FoxM1 or Ki-67 were categorized as low (<6) or high (≥6).

Cell culture and siRNA transfection

The HSCC cell line Fadu was purchased from the ATCC (Shanghai, China) and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; GE Healthcare Life Sciences-HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cambridge, MA, USA), in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting FoxM1 and a control siRNA were obtained from Biomics Biotechnologies, Co., Ltd. (Nantong, China). Fadu cells were placed in 96- or 6-well plates in complete DMEM overnight. When the cells reached ~50% confluence, they were transfected with the siRNAs using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 6 h of transfection, the medium containing siRNAs and Lipofectamine 2000 was replaced with 100 µl (96-well plates) or 2 ml (6-well plates) of complete DMEM. RNAs and proteins were obtained at 48 and 72 h after transfection, respectively. The sequences of FoxM1 siRNAs (si-FoxM1) were as follows: #1, 5′-GGAAAUGCUUGUGAUUCAAdTdT-3′ (sense) and 5′-UUGAAUCACAAGCAUUUCCdTdT-3′ (antisense); #2, 5′-GGAUGUGAAUCUUCCUAGAdTdT-3′ (sense) and 5′-UCUAGGAAGAUUCACAUCCdTdT-3′ (antisense); #3, 5′-CCAACAGGAGUCUAAUCAdTdT-3′ (sense) and 5′-UUGAUUAGACUCCUGUUGGdTdT-3′ (antisense); and #4, 5′-GGAUUUCAGCCCAGUACAAdTdT-3′ (sense) and 5′-UUGUACUGGGUGAAAUCCdTdT-3′ (antisense). The sequences of the negative control siRNA (si-NC) were 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT-3′ (sense) and 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAAdTdT-3′ (antisense).

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using TRIzol® reagent (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using a cDNA synthesis kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. qPCR was performed using the AceQ® qPCR SYBR Green-Master Mix kit (Vazyme). The primer sequences were as follows: Human GAPDH, 5′-GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC-3′ (reverse); and FoxM1, 5′-CAGACTATCAAGGAGGAAG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCAGGAGTGAGATGATTC-3′ (reverse). The qPCR conditions were 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. The levels of FoxM1 mRNA were quantified using the 2−ΔΔCT method and normalized against the levels of GAPDH.

Protein extraction and western blot analysis

Tissue and cell samples were lysed in lysis buffer (PMSF: RIPA, 1:100; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). Protein concentrations were quantified using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay method, and 20 µg protein samples were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and electroblotted onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). After blocking in 5% skimmed milk in Tris-buffered saline Tween-20 (TBST) for 2 h, the membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C [anti-FoxM1 (1:1,000; Bioworld Technology), anti-GAPDH (1:8,000; Abways Technology, Wynne, AR, USA), anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (#ab2426, 1:2,000; Abcam), anti-cyclin A1 (#sc-751; 1:300; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-E-cadherin (#RLT1453, 1:300; Suzhou Ruiying Biological Technology, Co., Ltd., Jiaozuo, China) and anti-vimentin (#RLT4879, 1:300; Suzhou Ruiying Biological Technology)], followed by incubation for 1 h with the corresponding secondary antibody (1:1,000) at room temperature. An ECL Plus kit (ZSbio, Beijing, China) was used to detect the immunoreactive bands.

Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8) cell proliferation assay

Fadu cells were seeded into a 96-well plate at a density of 5×103 cells/well and cultured in complete medium overnight. Subsequently, the cells were transfected with FoxM1-siRNAs or control siRNA. After 6 h of transfection, the medium was replaced with 100 µl of complete DMEM containing 10 µl CCK-8 solution (CCK-8 kit; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and the cells were incubated for 1.5 h. The end of this incubation was defined as 0 h, and other subsequent time-points (6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h) were also analyzed. The optical density (OD) value of each well was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

Flow cytometric analyses of the cell cycle and cell apoptosis

Cells were serum-deprived for 72 h, followed by incubation with complete medium for 6, 12, 24 and 36 h; cells were collected at every time-point. The cells were then seeded into a 6-well plate and cultured overnight, then transfected with si-FoxM1 or si-NC. After 48 h, the cells were collected and fixed in 70% ice-cold ethylalcohol (precooled at 4°C) for at least 24 h at −20°C. Following centrifugation, the cells were washed with ice-cold PBS three times to remove the fixation fluid. Subsequently, with the addition of 1 ng/ml RNaseA, the cells were incubated in the dark for 20 min at 4°C. Propidium iodide (PI; Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) was then added for staining. Finally, cell cycle distribution was analyzed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson) and CellQuest acquisition and analysis programs (Becton-Dickinson). Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

For the analysis of apoptosis, cells were double-stained with an Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit (BBI) according to the manufacturer's protocol and analyzed using the FACSCalibur flow cytometer.

Wound healing assay

Fadu cells were seeded into a 6-well plate and transfected with si-FoxM1 or si-NC. After 24 h, cell confluence reached 90% and wounds were created by scraping the cells with a 100 µl pipette tip. Subsequently, 1X PBS was used to remove the free-floating cells and serum-free medium was added to the 6-well plate. After 48 h, a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe the migrated distance of the cells. Duplicate wells of the same treatment groups were examined.

Immunofluorescence analysis

The expression of FoxM1, EMT markers and β-tubulin were observed by immunostaining and imaging. After transfection with si-FoxM1 or si-NC for 48 h, cells were seeded on coverslips, which were pre-placed in a 24-well plate and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde after 24 h adherent growth. After 40 min, cells were washed with 1X PBS and blocked in Immunol Staining Blocking Buffer (#P0102; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 2 h at room temperature. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies against FoxM1 (1:100; Bioworld Technology), cyclin A1 (#sc-751, 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), PCNA (#ab2426, 1:100; Abcam), E-cadherin (#RLT1453, 1:100; Suzhou Ruiying Biological Technology) vimentin (#RLT4879, 1:100; Suzhou Ruiying Biological Technologyl) and β-tubulin (#RLM3030, 1:100; Suzhou Ruiying Biological Technology) for 20 h, and then incubated with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000; Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Hoechst stain (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 2 h at room temperature in the dark. The images were viewed and recorded with a fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).

Immunocytochemical staining

Cells were seeded on coverslips that were pre-placed in a 24-well plate and treated with si-FoxM1or si-NC for 72 h. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 40 min and incubated with 4% BSA for 2 h, followed by incubation with primary antibodies against FoxM1 (1:100; Bioworld Technology), E-cadherin (#RLT1453, 1:100; Ruiying Biological) and vimentin (#RLT4879, 1:100; Ruiying Biological) overnight at 4°C. Cells were washed with PBS for 15 min (3×5 min) and then incubated with the 2-step Plus Poly-HRP Anti-Mouse/Rabbit IgG detection system. Subsequently, after rinsing with PBS, the cells were stained with DAB and hematoxylin solution was used to stain the nuclei. The cells were imaged and analyzed under a microscope (Leica Microsystems).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Student's t-test or ANOVA were performed to analyze the associations between FoxM1 expression and the clinicopathological features of the HSCC patients, as well as the results of the in vitro experiments, while a Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between FoxM1 expression and Ki-67 expression in HSCC patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall or recurrence-free survival times; the differences between the survival curves were analyzed using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. In all analyses, P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result. Continuous data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

Results

FoxM1 is highly expressed in HSCC and is associated with tumor progression

To evaluate the expression of FoxM1 in HSCC, IHC was used to examine FoxM1 expression in 63 HSCC specimens at different levels of malignancy and 20 adjacent normal tissue specimens. FoxM1 was expressed predominantly in the nuclei, and mixed nuclear and cytoplasmic expression was also observed in some tumor cells. Notably, all HSCC tissues showed positive FoxM1 staining, by contrast, all of the adjacent tissues showed negative or weak staining of FoxM1 (P<0.001; Fig. 1A–E). In addition, fresh tissue samples from 7 HSCC patients [consisting of 2 early-stage (designated T1-2), 5 advanced-stage (designated T3-7) and 2 para-cancer samples (designated N1-2)] were collected to examine the protein and mRNA expression levels of FoxM1. The results showed that the advanced-stage tumors exhibited higher expression levels of FoxM1 compared with the early-stage tumors and para-cancer tissues (Fig. 1F and G).

To investigate potential associations between the expression level of FoxM1 and the clinicopathological characteristics of the HSCC patients, we used a Student's t-test or an ANOVA to compare the mean expression levels of FoxM1 between patients grouped according to their clinicopathological characteristics. The mean FoxM1 expression levels (IHC final scores) were significantly increased in poorly differentiated vs. well-differentiated tumors (P=0.004), in tumor size >2 vs. ≤2 cm (P=0.002), in tumors of clinical stage III–IV vs. I–II (P=0.001), in cases with vs. without lymph node metastasis (P=0.002), and according to the treatment method (surgery vs. surgery + radiation; surgery, radiation + chemoradiotherapy; and other treatment, P=0.045), whereas there were no significant differences associated with patient's age or sex (Table I). All of these results indicate that FoxM1 is highly expressed in HSCC tissues, and that the overexpression of FoxM1 is involved in the degree of tumor malignancy in HSCC.

Elevated FoxM1 expression in HSCC patients is associated with poor prognosis

Ki-67, a nuclear protein, is widely utilized as a proliferation marker in tumor specimens, and the Ki-67 index has been reported to be prognostic in various malignancies (21). Our results showed that there was a positive correlation between FoxM1 and Ki-67 expression (Pearson's correlation coefficient: r=0.637, P<0.001; Fig. 2A–C). Furthermore, we divided 63 patients with hypopharyngeal cancer into two groups, the results of the Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test showed that patients with high FoxM1 expression (N=33, FoxM1 IHC score >6) had shorter overall survival (P=0.0004) and recurrence-free survival (P=0.001) times compared with those patients with low FoxM1 expression (N=30, FoxM1 IHC score ≤6) (Fig. 2D–F).

In addition, a Cox proportional hazards model was applied to estimate the effect of FoxM1 expression on HSCC patient survival. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified treatment method and the expression of FoxM1 and Ki-67 as significant prognostic factors. Using multivariate analysis, FoxM1 (HR, 5.051; 95% CI, 1.079–23.262; P=0.038), Ki-67 and tumor size were found to be independent prognostic factors for overall survival (Table II). Collectively, the results indicate that FoxM1 expression may act as an independent predictor for poor patient prognosis.

Table II

Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival.

Table II

Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival.

CharacteristicsUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
Age (years)
 <60/≥602.0160.768–5.2950.155
Sex
 Male/female21.895 0.001–890135.6420.569
Differentiation
 High/poor1.6420.629–4.2850.3111.0660.355–3.2010.909
Tumor size (cm)
 ≤2/>21.3430.515–3.5040.5470.1460.027–0.7960.026a
Clinical stage
 I–II/III–IV3.4420.795–14.9100.0982.8250.435–18.3420.277
Lymph node metastasis
 Negative/positive2.1710.785–6.0010.1352.4020.516–11.1930.264
Treatment
 Surgery only1.8831.182–3.0000.008b1.0930.598–1.9980.771
 Surgery and radiation
 Surgery, radiation, chemotherapy
 Other treatment
Ki-67 expression
 Low/high6.7071.880–23.9280.003b6.4871.196–35.1710.030a
FoxM1 expression
 Low/high8.7882.031–38.0210.004b5.0511.097–23.2620.038a

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-ijo-51-04-1045'] } HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval;

a P<0.05,

b P<0.01.

FoxM1 is highly expressed in proliferating Fadu cells

As the clinical data supported the hypothesis that high FoxM1 expression is associated with the proliferation of HSCC, further studies in the HSCC cell line Fadu were performed to verify this. We detected the expression of FoxM1 during cell cycle progression. Fadu cells were serum-deprived for 72 h, and serum was then added to the cultures for 6, 12, 24 and 36 h. It was observed that the proportion of cells in G1 phase decreased (from 71.58±0.76 to 44.56±0.77%), and those in S phase cells gradually increased (from 10.03±0.14 to 34.57±1.24%) with the addition of serum (Fig. 3A and B). In addition, the expression of FoxM1 was found to be increased concomitantly with the upregulation of the cell proliferation marker PCNA (Fig. 3C).

Knockdown of FoxM1 with siRNA blocks cell proliferation and induces cell cycle arrest in Fadu cells

To further identify the effect of FoxM1 on the biological functions of Fadu cells, cells were transfected with a negative control siRNA (si-NC) or one of four siRNAs targeting FoxM1, which were used to knockdown FoxM1 expression (Fig. 4A and B). The results showed that si-FoxM1#2 was the most effective at decreasing FoxM1 mRNA expression (reduction of 74±13%), and that si-FoxM1#4 was moderately effective (reduction of 65±11%); therefore, these two siRNAs were selected for use in subsequent experiments.

CCK-8 assays showed that FoxM1 knockdown resulted in a significant decrease in Fadu cell proliferation compared with the proliferation of si-NC-transfected cells (P<0.05; Fig. 4C). Flow cytometry was used to analyze the effects of FoxM1 on cell cycle distribution, which revealed a reduced proportion of cells in S phase following treatment with si-FoxM1#2 (24.07±0.39%; P<0.05) or si-FoxM1#4 (29.15±1.03%; P<0.05) compared with si-NC treatment (34.84±0.58%; Fig. 4D and E). In addition, the protein expression levels of cyclin A1 and PCNA, which are closely related to cell proliferation, were also downregulated after treatment with si-FoxM1 (Fig. 4F and G) compared with si-NC treatment. Taken together, these data confirm that FoxM1 may regulate cell proliferation by influencing cell cycle progression.

Knockdown of FoxM1 with siRNA promotes apoptosis in Fadu cells

Annexin V/PI dual staining was used to confirm that FoxM1 knockdown could induce apoptosis in HSCC cells. As shown in Fig. 5A and B, after transfection with si-FoxM1 for 48 h, the proportion of cells undergoing apoptosis was increased from 2.37±0.10 (si-NC) to 4.37±0.29 (si-FoxM1#4) or 5.42±0.56 (si-FoxM1#2). These results indicate that higher levels of FoxM1 decrease the rate of cell apoptosis in HSCC.

FoxM1 enhances the migration of Fadu cells by promoting EMT

The migratory capacities of Fadu cells transfected with si-NC or si-FoxM1 were detected with a wound-healing assay. Following culture in serum-free medium for 48 h, the migratory activities of cells in the si-FoxM1#2 group were notably impaired compared with those of the si-NC group (Fig. 6A and B). These results indicated that FoxM1 may stimulate cell migration in HSCC.

EMT, as an essential cell biological process related to embryonic development, also contributes to cancer metastasis and tumor progression (22). During EMT, proliferating epithelial cells acquire the features of a more invasive mesenchymal phenotype, including increased migratory activity and motility (23). In order to investigate whether FoxM1 contributes to EMT progression in HSCC cells, we evaluated the protein expression levels of FoxM1 and epithelial (E-cadherin) and mesenchymal (vimentin) markers in Fadu cells. Western blot analysis revealed that cells treated with si-FoxM1 exhibited increased E-cadherin expression and decreased vimentin expression (Fig. 6C). Consistent with the results of the western blot analysis, the data from the immunofluorescence assays showed a similar molecular expression pattern, indicating phenotypic changes between Fadu cells transfected with si-NC and si-FoxM1 (Fig. 7A). The results were also confirmed by immunocytochemical staining; following FoxM1 knockdown, the staining intensity of vimentin was decreased and the staining intensity of E-cadherin was increased (Fig. 7B). Collectively, these results indicated that FoxM1 overexpression could partially induce the transition to a mesenchymal phenotype, which may be a potential mechanism regulating migration in HSCC cells. Furthermore, using immunofluorescence microscopy, we detected the expression of β-tubulin, which plays an essential role in maintaining cell morphology and promoting the migration of Fadu cells. Cells treated with si-FoxM1 showed fewer fibers and pseudopodia compared with the si-NC group (Fig. 7C), indicating that FoxM1 may be involved in the formation and growth of invadopodia and, thus, the initiation of cell migration (24).

Discussion

The progression of carcinomas is affected by complex gene regulatory networks. At present, little has been established regarding the molecular mechanisms involved in HSCC. A previous study by Mochizuki et al (25) demonstrated that CD271 was a marker for tumor initiation and was associated with a poor prognosis in human HSCC. Additionally, STK33 was found to be a potential oncogene and a promising diagnostic marker for HSCC (26,27). However, these two molecules alone do not explain the pathogenesis of HSCC.

Previous evidence has shown that aberrant expression of FoxM1 is involved in tumorigenesis and tumor progression (9,28). Overexpression of FoxM1 has been shown to be associated with larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis, advanced tumor stage and poor disease-free and overall survival times in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (29). In addition, patients with FoxM1-overexpressing angiosarcoma had significantly shorter disease-specific and event-free survival times compared with patients with low FoxM1 expression (30). Thus, a high level of FoxM1 in tumor patients appears to consistently indicate a high degree of malignancy and predict a poor prognosis. In the present study, FoxM1 was expressed to a significantly higher level in HSCC compared with para-tumor tissues in paraffin-embedded specimens. In addition, patients with advanced-stage HSCC had higher FoxM1 expression at the protein and mRNA levels compared with those patients with early-stage disease. Furthermore, analysis of the associations between FoxM1 expression and the clinicopathological features of 63 patients with HSCC revealed that patients defined as having poorly differentiated tumors, large tumor size, advanced-stage disease, positive lymph node metastasis and high Ki-67 expression exhibited higher FoxM1 expression. The results of Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses suggested that patients with high FoxM1 expression had a higher rate of mortality and tendency for recurrence. Collectively, these results indicate that high expression of FoxM1 may be a biological marker for malignant transformation and an indicator of poor prognosis in HSCC.

Abnormal proliferation has been demonstrated to be a key feature for cellular malignant transformation, and to play a vital role in tumorigenesis and development. FoxM1 is a typical proliferation-associated transcription factor involved in promoting the entry of cells into S phase and M phase, thereby maintaining the proper execution of mitosis (7,31). Previous studies have reported that tumor cells with elevated FoxM1 expression showed high proliferative ability, whereas inhibition of FoxM1 expression led to the suppression of proliferative activity. It was shown that knockdown of FoxM1 expression significantly diminished NPC cell proliferation in vitro and inhibited the growth of NPC tumors in vivo (32). Furthermore, by using shRNA to diminish FoxM1 expression, Yang et al (33) found that reduced FoxM1 expression blocked the anchorage-independent growth and proliferation of MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and ZR-75-30 breast cancer cells. In addition, FoxM1 was revealed to serve a pivotal role in tumor cell cycle progression. Previous studies also found that downregulation of FoxM1 inhibited cell proliferation and induced cell cycle arrest, with reduced the expression levels of cyclin B1, cyclin D1, and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (34). Moreover, Jiang et al (18) found that thiostrepton-mediated downregulation of FoxM1 induced cell cycle arrest at S phase and inhibited DNA synthesis in LSCC cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Consistent with these prior studies, the present results demonstrated that Fadu cells with inhibited FoxM1 expression showed a decreased rate of proliferation and a reduced proportion of cells in S phase, along with decreased levels of PCNA and cyclin A1 expression, thus, confirming the role of FoxM1 in the regulation of tumor cell proliferation via its influence on cell cycle progression.

The survival and growth of cancer cells does not depend solely on proliferation, but also on resistance to cell death signals. FoxM1 was previously reported to act as an oncogene by regulating cell apoptosis (35). In the present study, we found that knockdown of FoxM1 expression markedly reduced the rate of Fadu cell apoptosis, validating the stimulatory effect of FoxM1 on HSCC aggressiveness.

Metastasis, which is regarded as a significant event during the malignant progression of a tumor, has been widely researched; however, its detailed mechanisms are not fully understood. Various evidence supports the hypothesis that FoxM1 plays an active role in tumor cell migration and metastasis in malignancies such as liver (36) and colorectal cancer (37). In the present study, we observed that FoxM1 overexpression was related to the metastasis of HSCC. Accumulating data have revealed that EMT leads to increased cell migration in several types of cancer (38). In colorectal cancer, EMT was found to be a key process in tumor metastasis (37,39). In gastric cancer, it was demonstrated that Grhl2 reduced cell migration by inhibiting TGF-β-induced EMT in vitro and in vivo (40). In the present study, altered cell migratory capacity together with changes in the expression of EMT markers (E-cadherin and vimentin) in response to FoxM1 knockdown indicated that FoxM1 had a notable effect on the process of EMT in HSCC cells.

As one of the primary components and functional units of the cytoskeleton, β-tubulin is expressed in a wide variety of eukaryotic cells and is involved in invadopodium formation, which ultimately influences cell movement (41). We observed that Fadu cells transfected with si-NC had long erpseudopodia compared with those treated with si-FoxM1. Therefore, FoxM1-mediated EMT may be a pivotal step in HSCC metastasis.

There exist some limitations in this study. Firstly, due to low rates of HSCC, the number of samples is relatively small, with available follow-up data. Secondly, all of our samples were obtained from the same hospital. And then, the intricate mechanisms of FoxM1 in promoting HSCC progression need further studies to confirm. Furthermore, studies are also needed to enhance our results in vivo.

In conclusion, the present results demonstrated that FoxM1 was highly expressed in HSCC tissues, and that upregulated FoxM1 was significantly associated with the malignant phenotype and poor prognosis of HSCC patients, indicating a key role of FoxM1 in the regulation of HSCC progression. We also demonstrated that FoxM1 may serve as a promoter of HSCC cell cycle progression, thereby inducing cell proliferation. In addition, FoxM1 appeared to protect Fadu cells from apoptosis, and facilitate HSCC cell migration, possibly by promoting EMT. Collectively, these findings provide evidence for a novel molecular mechanism underlying the development of HSCC, and may lead to improvements in molecular targeted therapies for this type of tumor.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the Scientific and Innovative Research Project of Nantong (MS32016015).

References

1 

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:87–108. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Cooper JS, Porter K, Mallin K, Hoffman HT, Weber RS, Ang KK, Gay EG and Langer CJ: National Cancer Database report on cancer of the head and neck: 10-year update. Head Neck. 31:748–758. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Day D, Hansen AR and Siu LL: Hypopharyngeal cancer: looking back, moving forward. Curr Oncol. 23:221–222. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Hall SF, Groome PA, Irish J and O'Sullivan B: The natural history of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx. Laryngoscope. 118:1362–1371. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Hanahan D and Weinberg RA: The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 100:57–70. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Peiris-Pages M, Pestell RG, Sotgia F and Lisanti MP: Cancer metabolism: A therapeutic perspective. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 14:11–31. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Wierstra I: The transcription factor FOXM1 (Forkhead box M1): Proliferation-specific expression, transcription factor function, target genes, mouse models, and normal biological roles. Adv Cancer Res. 118:97–398. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Petrovic V: FoxM1 regulates cell cycle progression through multiple mechanisms. University of Illinois at Chicago; Dissertations & Theses - Gradworks. 2008

9 

Halasi M and Gartel AL: FOX(M1) news: it is cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 12:245–254. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Miao L, Xiong X, Lin Y, Cheng Y, Lu J, Zhang J and Cheng N: Down-regulation of FoxM1 leads to the inhibition of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer cells. Cancer Genet. 207:75–82. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Kong FF, Qu ZQ, Yuan HH, Wang JY, Zhao M, Guo YH, Shi J, Gong XD, Zhu YL, Liu F, et al: Overexpression of FOXM1 is associated with EMT and is a predictor of poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 31:2660–2668. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Jiang L, Wang P and Chen H: Overexpression of FOXM1 is associated with metastases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ups J Med Sci. 119:324–332. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Sun HC, Li M, Lu JL, Yan DW, Zhou CZ, Fan JW, Qin XB, Tang HM and Peng ZH: Overexpression of Forkhead box M1 protein associates with aggressive tumor features and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 25:1533–1539. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Wu XR, Chen YH, Liu DM, Sha JJ, Xuan HQ, Bo JJ and Huang YR: Increased expression of forkhead box M1 protein is associated with poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Med Oncol. 30:3462013. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Xia JT, Wang H, Liang LJ, Peng BG, Wu ZF, Chen LZ, Xue L, Li Z and Li W: Overexpression of FOXM1 is associated with poor prognosis and clinicopathologic stage of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 41:629–635. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Ahmad A, Wang Z, Kong D, Ali S, Li Y, Banerjee S, Ali R and Sarkar FH: FoxM1 down-regulation leads to inhibition of proliferation, migration and invasion of breast cancer cells through the modulation of extra-cellular matrix degrading factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 122:337–346. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Nakamura S, Hirano I, Okinaka K, Takemura T, Yokota D, Ono T, Shigeno K, Shibata K, Fujisawa S and Ohnishi K: The FOXM1 transcriptional factor promotes the proliferation of leukemia cells through modulation of cell cycle progression in acute myeloid leukemia. Carcinogenesis. 31:2012–2021. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Jiang L, Wu X, Wang P, Wen T, Yu C, Wei L and Chen H: Targeting FoxM1 by thiostrepton inhibits growth and induces apoptosis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 141:971–981. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Huang C, Qiu Z, Wang L, Peng Z, Jia Z, Logsdon CD, Le X, Wei D, Huang S and Xie K: A novel FoxM1-caveolin signaling pathway promotes pancreatic cancer invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res. 72:655–665. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar :

20 

Xue J, Lin X, Chiu WT, Chen YH, Yu G, Liu M, Feng XH, Sawaya R, Medema RH, Hung MC and Huang S: Sustained activation of SMAD3/SMAD4 by FOXM1 promotes TGF-β-dependent cancer metastasis. J Clin Invest. 124:564–579. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Ghanim B, Klikovits T, Hoda MA, Lang G, Szirtes I, Setinek U, Rozsas A, Renyi-Vamos F, Laszlo V, Grusch M, et al: Ki67 index is an independent prognostic factor in epithelioid but not in non-epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma: A multicenter study. Br J Cancer. 112:783–792. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Mego M, Reuben J and Mani S: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stem cells (CSCs): The Traveling Metastasis. Liquid Biopsies in Solid Tumors. Cancer Drug Discovery and Development. Cristofanilli M: Humana Press; Totowa, NJ: pp. 67–80. 2017, View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Chen T, You Y, Jiang H and Wang ZZ: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT): A biological process in the development, stem cell differentiation, and tumorigenesis. J Cell Physiol. Jan 12–2017, (Epub ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25797urisimplehttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25797. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Chodniewicz D and Klemke RL: Guiding cell migration through directed extension and stabilization of pseudopodia. Exp Cell Res. 301:31–37. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Mochizuki M, Tamai K, Imai T, Sugawara S, Ogama N, Nakamura M, Matsuura K, Yamaguchi K, Satoh K, Sato I, et al: CD271 regulates the proliferation and motility of hypopharyngeal cancer cells. Sci Rep. 6:307072016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Huang L, Chen C, Zhang G, Ju Y, Zhang J, Wang H and Li J: STK33 overexpression in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Possible role in tumorigenesis. BMC Cancer. 15:132015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Chen C, Huang L, Zhang G, Li Y, Li L, Bai X, Liu W, Wang H and Li J: STK33 potentiates the malignancy of hypopharyngeal squamous carcinoma: Possible relation to calcium. Cancer Biol Ther. 17:976–984. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Wierstra I: FOXM1 (Forkhead box M1) in tumorigenesis: Overexpression in human cancer, implication in tumorigenesis, oncogenic functions, tumor-suppressive properties, and target of anticancer therapy. Adv Cancer Res. 119:191–419. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Ahn H, Sim J, Abdul R, Chung MS, Paik SS, Oh YH, Park CK and Jang K: Increased expression of forkhead box M1 is associated with aggressive phenotype and poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Korean Med Sci. 30:390–397. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Ito T, Kohashi K, Yamada Y, Iwasaki T, Maekawa A, Kuda M, Hoshina D, Abe R, Furue M and Oda Y: Prognostic significance of forkhead Box M1 (FOXM1) expression and antitumor effect of FOXM1 inhibition in angiosarcoma. J Cancer. 7:823–830. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Wierstra I and Alves J: FOXM1, a typical proliferation-associated transcription factor. Biol Chem. 388:1257–1274. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Chen H, Yang C, Yu L, Xie L, Hu J, Zeng L and Tan Y: Adenovirus-mediated RNA interference targeting FOXM1 transcription factor suppresses cell proliferation and tumor growth of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Gene Med. 14:231–240. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Yang C, Chen H, Yu L, Shan L, Xie L, Hu J, Chen T and Tan Y: Inhibition of FOXM1 transcription factor suppresses cell proliferation and tumor growth of breast cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 20:117–124. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Xue Y, Zhang G, Xu R, Zou X, Zhong X, Wu G, Wang X, Long D, Wu Y, Xu H, et al: Overexpression of FoxM1 is associated with tumor progression. J Urol. 189:e7832013. View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Bhat UG, Halasi M and Gartel AL: Thiazole antibiotics target FoxM1 and induce apoptosis in human cancer cells. PLoS One. 4:e5592. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Park HJ, Gusarova G, Wang Z, Carr JR, Li J, Kim KH, Qiu J, Park YD, Williamson PR, Hay N, et al: Deregulation of FoxM1b leads to tumour metastasis. EMBO Mol Med. 3:21–34. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Zhang C, Wang Y, Feng Y, Zhang Y, Ji B, Wang S and Sun Y, Zhu C, Zhang D and Sun Y: Gli1 promotes colorectal cancer metastasis in a Foxm1-dependent manner by activating EMT and PI3K-AKT signaling. Oncotarget. 7:86134–86147. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Lamouille S, Xu J and Derynck R: Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 15:178–196. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Chen B, Zeng X, He Y, Wang X, Liang Z, Liu J, Zhang P, Zhu H, Xu N and Liang S: STC2 promotes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of colorectal cancer cells through AKT-ERK signaling pathways. Oncotarget. 7:71400–71416. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

40 

Xiang J, Fu X, Ran W and Wang Z: Grhl2 reduces invasion and migration through inhibition of TGFβ-induced EMT in gastric cancer. Oncogenesis. 6:e2842017. View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Ganguly A and Cabral F: The arresting action of microtubules in cell motility. Cell Cycle. 10:2614–2615. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October 2017
Volume 51 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

2016 Impact Factor: 3.079
Ranked #33/217 Oncology
(total number of cites)

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Ni, H., Ding, C., Zhang, X., & Zhang, Z. (2017). FoxM1 overexpression promotes cell proliferation and migration and inhibits apoptosis in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma resulting in poor clinical prognosis. International Journal of Oncology, 51, 1045-1054. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4094
MLA
Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Ni, H., Ding, C., Zhang, X., Zhang, Z."FoxM1 overexpression promotes cell proliferation and migration and inhibits apoptosis in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma resulting in poor clinical prognosis". International Journal of Oncology 51.4 (2017): 1045-1054.
Chicago
Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Ni, H., Ding, C., Zhang, X., Zhang, Z."FoxM1 overexpression promotes cell proliferation and migration and inhibits apoptosis in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma resulting in poor clinical prognosis". International Journal of Oncology 51, no. 4 (2017): 1045-1054. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4094