Open Access

Microarray analysis of differentially-expressed genes and linker genes associated with the molecular mechanism of colorectal cancer

  • Authors:
    • Xingjie Shen
    • Meng Yue
    • Fansheng Meng
    • Jingyu Zhu
    • Xiaoyan Zhu
    • Yakun Jiang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 12, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5122
  • Pages: 3250-3258
  • Copyright: © Shen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and remains the third leading cause of cancer‑associated mortality. The present study aimed to fully elucidate the pathogenesis of CRC and identify associated genes in tumor development. Microarray GSE44076, GSE41328 and GSE44861 datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database and integrated with meta‑analysis. Differentially‑expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from CRC samples compared with adjacent non‑cancerous controls using the Limma package in R, followed by functional analysis using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery online tool. A protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs and linker genes was constructed using NetBox software and modules were also mined. Functional annotation was performed for modules with a maximum number of nodes. Subsequent to meta‑analysis to pool the data, one dataset that included 327 samples involved in 11,081 genes was obtained. A total of 697 DEGs were identified between CRC samples and adjacent non‑cancerous controls. In the PPI network, modules 1 and 5 contained the maximum number of nodes. Collagen, type I, α1 (COL1A1), COL1A2 and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) in module 1 and UDP‑glucose 6‑dehydrogenase (UGDH), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1 (ALDH1A1), fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) and monoglyceride lipase (MGLL) in module 5 exhibited a high degree of connectivity. Functional analysis indicated that the genes in module 1 were involved in extracellular matrix (ECM)‑associated functions and that the genes in module 5 were involved in metabolism‑related functions. Overall, significant DEGs and linker genes, namely COL1A1, COL1A2, MMP9, UGDH, ALDH1A1, FABP4 and MGLL, play a crucial role in the development of CRC via regulating the ECM and cell metabolism.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC), also known as colon cancer, is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and remains the third leading cause of cancer-associated mortality (1). In 2014, ~65,000 women and 71,830 men were estimated to be diagnosed with CRC (2).

Similar to the majority of other complex tumors, CRC has been the subject of multiple studies with regards to its pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy. Much has been elucidated about the molecular mechanism of CRC in recent years. It is widely recognized that chromosomal instability is the most common genetic abnormality to occur in CRC and has been found in almost 85% of all CRC cases (3). Key genes involved in this pathway include Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), deleted in colorectal carcinoma (DCC), SMAD family member 2 (SMAD2) and SMAD4. KRAS is a proto-oncogene that plays a critical role in the transduction of intracellular signals. The activation of KRAS by binding to guanosine triphosphate could regulate downstream mediator mitogen-activated protein kinase, which is involved in cell division (4). Additionally, SMAD2 and SMAD4 play a vital role in the transforming growth factor-β signaling pathway, which in involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis (5). DCC has been shown to correlate with metastasis and a poor prognosis in CRC (6). Moreover, chronic inflammation has been shown to increase the incidence of bowel cancer (7). In the process of inflammation, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) is a key molecule highlighted by experiments (8). Previous studies into the downstream effects of COX have illustrated that basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor are activated by COX2 via prostaglandin E2, all of which are involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and angiogenesis contributing to tumor development (911). However, the pathogenesis of CRC is complex and multifactorial. The complete elucidation of its etiology remains to be defined.

The present study analyzed three microarray datasets, comparing between colon tumor samples and adjacent normal mucosa tissue samples. Differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and functional annotation was performed for significant genes, followed by protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction. The study aimed to detect the molecular mechanisms and associated genes in the development of CRC.

Materials and methods

Microarray data

A total of 3 microarray datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), including GSE44076 (12), GSE41328 (13) and GSE44861 (14). Expression data from GSE44076, which included colon tumor samples from 98 patients and adjacent paired normal mucosa tissues from 50 healthy donors, were obtained using platform GPL13667 (Affymetrix Human Genome U219 Arrays). Microarray data from GSE41328, which included 5 colorectal adenocarcinomas samples and 5 matched normal colon tissue, were generated with the [HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array platform. Expression data from GSE44861, which included 56 tumor samples and 55 adjacent non-cancerous tissue samples, were obtained through the [HT_HG-U133A] Affymetrix HT Human Genome U133A Array platform.

Data preprocessing

Prior to analysis, probe identifications in each dataset were converted into standard gene symbols. For genes with more than one probe set in the array, the average value for the probes was obtained as the expression value of the gene. By contrast, the probe set was deleted when mapped to more than one gene. As the genes were different in the 3 datasets, meta-analysis was performed of these studies, pooling the microarray data across different platforms. In the combined process, batch effects are inevitable. To adjust the data for these batch effects, the surrogate variable analysis package (15) was applied, and normalization was performed using the preprocessCore package (16) in R.

Identification of DEGs in CRC

To identify significant DEGs in colon tumor samples compared with adjacent non-cancerous controls, preprocessed data were exported to Limma package in R language (17). An adjusted P-value was estimated using the Benjamini & Hochberg (BH) method (18). Significant DEGs were identified as those with |log 2 FC (fold-change)|>1 and an adjusted P-value of <0.05.

Functional annotation of DEGs in CRC

Testing for functional enrichment of DEGs in CRC was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) online tool (19). Categories analyzed included Gene Ontology (GO) terms (20) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (21). Data from the GO annotations was used to construct a functional enrichment network, which was visualized by the enrichment map plugin in Cytoscape (22). The BH correction for multiple testing was performed with a cutoff for an adjusted P-value of <0.05.

PPI network construction

NetBox software, which is written in the Java language, is used to store and establishment the Human Interaction Network based on public databases consisting of Reactome (23,24), the Human Protein Reference Database (25), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Cancer Cell Map (26) and the National Cancer Institute-Nature Pathway Interaction Database (27). Linker genes with statistical significance, which are not differentially-expressed in colon tumors, but interact with DEGs, were obtained through mapping DEGs onto the network. Cytoscape software (28) was used to visualize the molecular interaction. Besides the PPI network under the criteria, NetBox also divided the network into modules. The modules with the maximum number of nodes in the PPI network were subjected to GO terms and Swiss-Prot and Protein Information Resource Keywords enrichment analysis with the DAVID online tool.

Results

Preprocessed results and DEGs in CRC

Following meta-analysis of these 3 studies to pool microarray data across the different platforms, one dataset was obtained that included 327 samples and 11,081 genes. The dataset was preprocessed and normalized, followed by further analysis. The normalized results are shown in Fig. 1. A total of 697 genes were selected as DEGs, including 286 upregulated and 411 downregulated genes, between CRC samples and adjacent non-cancerous control.

Significant functions and pathways of DEGs

To annotate these DEGs in the tumor samples, DAVID was used for GO function and KEGG pathway analysis, with the threshold of the adjusted P-value at <0.05. Functional enrichment networks of upregulated and downregulated DEGs are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. The results showed that upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in cell cycle-related functions, including the cell cycle process, the regulation of the mitotic cell cycle and the regulation of cell proliferation. Downregulated DEGs were mainly enriched in homeostasis-related functions, including chemical homeostasis and cellular ion homeostasis.

PPI network analysis

Significant DEGs and linker genes were used to construct the PPI network (Figs. 4 and 5). In the PPI network for upregulated DEGs (Fig. 4), there were 2,508 edges and 296 genes, including 140 DEGs and 156 linker genes. The network was divided into 9 modules by NetBox, in which module 1 contained the maximum number of nodes. Additionally, in the PPI network for downregulated DEGs, there were 301 edges and 165 genes, including 113 DEGs and 42 linker genes. The network was divided into 18 modules, in which module 5 contained the maximum number of nodes. In the PPI network, the hub genes were mined with the top-five degrees of connectivity in the different modules (Table I). The upregulated minichromosome maintenance complex component 7 gene in module 0, linker genes collagen, type I, α1 (COL1A1) and COL1A2, and differentially-expressed matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) in module 1, and linker genes polo-like kinase 1 and exportin 1 in module 2 exhibited a connectivity degree of >20. Downregulated genes UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase (UGDH), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1 (ALDH1A1), fatty acid binding protein 4, adipocyte (FABP4) and monoglyceride lipase (MGLL) in module 5 exhibited a connectivity degree of >20.

Table I.

Connectivity degree of hub genes in the top-five modules.

Table I.

Connectivity degree of hub genes in the top-five modules.

Module no.Hub geneDegree
Upregulated gene modules
  0MCM722
  0TP5321
  0ORC1L21
  0ORC4L20
  0CDC45L20
  1COL1A125
  1COL1A220
  1MMP920
  1FN119
  1ITGB118
  2PLK171
  2XPO168
  2CDC2066
  2BIRC564
  2 PAFAH1B163
  4RRM211
  4SLC27A59
  4CYP39A18
  4SQLE7
  4LIPE6
  5BMP77
  5INHBA7
  5BMP46
  5INHBB5
  5BAMBI5
Downregulated gene modules
  5UGDH26
  5ALDH1A122
  5FABP421
  5MGLL21
  5PPAP2A21
  6PLG7
  6MEP1A6
  6MEP1B6
  6C35
  6NPY5
  8SHBG8
  8SPINK73
  8MT1G2
  8MT2A2
  8MT1F1
  9CCRL15
  9VCAN5
  9CCL55
  9CCL215
  9CCL194
  12CALM111
  12CAV15
  12SCP23
  12EDNRB3
  12EDN32

The functional annotation results showed that the DEGs in module 1 were mainly enriched in extracellular region-related functions and extracellular matrix (ECM)-associated functions (Table II). Downregulated DEGs in module 5 were significantly enriched in metabolic process and biosynthetic process-related functions (Table III).

Table II.

Functional annotation of genes in module 1.

Table II.

Functional annotation of genes in module 1.

CategoryTermCountBonferroni
Annotation cluster 1Enrichment score: 42.348195504843254
  GOTERM_CC_FAT GO:0044421~extracellular region part63 2.07×10−45
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSSecreted65 8.47×10−42
  GOTERM_CC_FAT GO:0005576~extracellular region71 2.53×10−35
Annotation Cluster 2Enrichment score: 41.212870504723476
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSSignal80 6.46×10−42
  UP_SEQ_FEATURESignal peptide80 2.31×10−41
  GOTERM_CC_FAT GO:0005576~extracellular region71 2.53×10−35
Annotation cluster 3Enrichment score: 26.15393329757373
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSExtracellular matrix32 3.45×10−33
  GOTERM_CC_FAT GO:0031012~extracellular matrix35 8.66×10−28
  GOTERM_CC_FAT GO:0005578~proteinaceous extracellular matrix33 3.76×10−26
  GOTERM_CC_FAT GO:0044420~extracellular matrix part15 1.57×10−11

[i] GO, Gene Ontology; SP_PIR_KEYWORDS, Swiss-Prot and Protein Information Resource Keywords; CC, cellular component.

Table III.

Functional annotation of genes in module 5.

Table III.

Functional annotation of genes in module 5.

CategoryTermCountBenjamini
Annotation cluster 1Enrichment score: 28.81018243601853
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSOxidoreductase28 1.58×10−31
  GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0055114~oxidation reduction28 2.57×10−25
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0008202~steroid metabolic process21 5.77×10−25
Annotation cluster 2Enrichment score: 17.61044037865203
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0008202~steroid metabolic process21 5.77×10−25
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSNadp14 3.94×10−17
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0016125~sterol metabolic process12 2.20×10−13
  GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0008203~cholesterol metabolic process10 1.82×10−10
Annotation cluster 3Enrichment score: 10.153502326316204
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0006694~steroid biosynthetic process15 5.19×10−20
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0016125~sterol metabolic process12 2.20×10−13
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0008610~lipid biosynthetic process15 6.44×10−12
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSSteroid biosynthesis8 1.29×10−11
  GOTERM_BP_FATGO:0016126~sterol biosynthetic process7 2.68×10−8
  KEGG_PATHWAYhsa00100:steroid biosynthesis7 1.05×10−8
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSSterol biosynthesis6 1.17×10−8
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSLipid synthesis7 2.69×10−7
  SP_PIR_KEYWORDSCholesterol biosynthesis3 2.98×10−3
  GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0006695~cholesterol biosynthetic process3 4.89×10−2

[i] GO, Gene Ontology; SP_PIR_KEYWORDS, Swiss-Prot and Protein Information Resource Keywords; BP, biological process; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Discussion

Using a meta-analysis approach to group 3 microarray datasets, including GSE44076, GSE41328 and GSE44861, DEGs were identified in CRC mucosa compared with adjacent normal mucosa samples. The results suggested that there were 697 DEGs, including 286 upregulated genes. Functional annotation results showed that the upregulated DEGs were involved in cell cycle-related functions, in comparison with the downregulated DEGs, which were enriched in homeostasis-associated functions. In the PPI network, the linker genes COL1A1 and COL1A2, and the DEGs MMP9, UGDH, ALDH1A1, FABP4 and MGLL, which exhibited a connectivity degree of >20, participated in the development of CRC.

After the upregulated and downregulated networks were divided into multiple modules, modules 1 and 5 with the maximum number of nodes were subjected to functional annotation. In module 1, the linker genes COL1A1 and COL1A2, and the DEG MMP9 exhibited the highest degree of connectivity. COL1A1 and COL1A2, two type I collagen members, are major components of the ECM. Growing evidence has shown that the ECM plays a critical role in promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is associated with tumor invasion and metastasis (29). Additionally, EMT is indicated to confer tumor cell resistance to apoptosis and to promote the escape of tumor cells from the senescence process (30,31). Moreover, a pioneer study uncovered the fact that EMT has the capacity of endowing tumor cells with cancer stem cell-like characteristics, which could promote tumor development and chemoresistance (32). MMP9 (also known as gelatinase B), a member of the MMP family, has been proven to degrade various components of the ECM, including type I collagen (33). Notably, an elevated level of MMP9 has been found in CRC (34), which is consistent with the present analysis. Numerous studies have shown that MMP9 plays crucial roles in invasion, metastasis, cell proliferation and angiogenesis (35,36). Angiogenesis and cell proliferation are critically important for tumor development and metastatic spreading (37). From the results of the functional annotation in the present study, the three important genes in module 1 were mainly enriched in ECM-related functions and the ECM-receptor interaction pathway. Accordingly, COL1A1, COL1A2 and MMP9 are involved in CRC tumorigenesis and metastasis via regulation of ECM-associated functions.

In module 5, UGDH, ALDH1A1, FABP4 and MGLL were downregulated in colorectal tumor samples and were significantly involved in metabolism-related functions. UGDH is the four-electron transfer enzyme and is associated with the biosynthesis of hyaluronan (HA), which participants in tissue organization, development and cell proliferation (38). A previous study showed that elevated levels of HA are directly involved in the progression of various cancers, and UGDH has been proposed as a biomarker for prostate cancer (39). In parallel, ALDH1A1, which belongs to a superfamily of enzymes, has been identified as a crystalline in the lens and cornea (40). Notably, ALDH1A1 also plays a critical role in regulating lipid metabolism and gluconeogenesis (41). In addition, FABP4, known as a new adipokine, is involved in fatty acid trafficking from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and in lipid metabolism (42). Furthermore, FABP4 is considered as a candidate biomarker of lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome (43). It is well known that MGLL is a member of the serine hydrolase superfamily, which hydrolyze intracellular triglyceride and cholesteryl ester into free fatty acid as an important fuel in mammals (44). More recently, MGLL was found to be abnormally expressed in aggressive human cancer, and to promote cell proliferation and tumor growth (45). It is now clear that the conversion of cells from a normal to cancerous state requires metabolic alterations, including changes in lipid metabolism and gluconeogenesis, in order to support tumor growth and survival. As a result, UGDH, ALDH1A1, FABP4 and MGLL play a key role in metabolism-related functions and regulate the tumorigenesis of CRC.

Taken together, the present results suggest that COL1A1, COL1A2 and MMP9 in module 1, and UGDH, ALDH1A1, FABP4 and MGLL in module 5 serve as key hub genes in CRC development, where the genes regulate ECM and cell metabolism-associated functions that are important for tumor growth. However, additional experiments will be required to confirm the bioinformatic results.

References

1 

Kemp Z, Thirlwell C, Sieber O, Silver A and Tomlinson I: An update on the genetics of colorectal cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 13:R177–R185. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Siegel R, DeSantis C and Jemal A: Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 64:104–117. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Grady WM and Carethers JM: Genomic and epigenetic instability in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology. 135:1079–1099. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, Brandhuber BJ, Anderson DJ, Alvarado R, Ludlam MJ, Stokoe D, Gloor SL, Vigers G, et al: RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature. 464:431–435. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Bellam N and Pasche B: Tgf-beta signaling alterations and colon cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 155:85–103. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Chang SC, Lin JK, Yang SH, Wang HS, Li AF and Chi CW: Relationship between genetic alterations and prognosis in sporadic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 118:1721–1727. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Harpaz N and Polydorides AD: Colorectal dysplasia in chronic inflammatory bowel disease: Pathology, clinical implications and pathogenesis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 134:876–895. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Zisman TL and Rubin DT: Colorectal cancer and dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 14:2662–2669. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Wang D and Dubois RN: Prostaglandins and cancer. Gut. 55:115–122. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Eisinger AL, Prescott SM, Jones DA and Stafforini DM: The role of cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandins in colon cancer. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 82:147–154. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Doherty GA, Byrne SM, Molloy ES, Malhotra V, Austin SC, Kay EW, Murray FE and Fitzgerald DJ: Proneoplastic effects of PGE2 mediated by EP4 receptor in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 9:2072009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Sanz-Pamplona R, Berenguer A, Cordero D, Molleví DG, Crous-Bou M, Sole X, Paré-Brunet L, Guino E, Salazar R, Santos C, et al: Aberrant gene expression in mucosa adjacent to tumor reveals a molecular crosstalk in colon cancer. Mol Cancer. 13:462014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Lin G, He X, Ji H, Shi L, Davis RW and Zhong S: Reproducibility probability score-incorporating measurement variability across laboratories for gene selection. Nat Biotechnol. 24:1476–1477. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Ryan BM, Zanetti KA, Robles AI, Schetter AJ, Goodman J, Hayes RB, Huang WY, Gunter MJ, Yeager M, Burdette L, et al: Germline variation in NCF4, an innate immunity gene, is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 134:1399–1407. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS, Fertig EJ, Jaffe AE and Storey JD: Package ‘SVA’: Surrogate Variable Analysis. R package version 3. 2013, https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/manuals/sva/man/sva.pdf

16 

Bolstad BM: Package ‘preprocessCore’: A collection of pre-processing functions. R package version 1. 2013, https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/manuals/preprocessCore/man/preprocessCore.pdf

17 

Smyth GK: Limma: Linear models for microarray dataBioinformatics and computational biology solutions using R and Bioconductor. Springer; NY: pp. 397–420. 2005, View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Ferreira JA: The Benjamini-Hochberg method in the case of discrete test statistics. Int J Biostat. 3:112007. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC and Lempicki RA: DAVID: Database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 4:P32003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al: Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 25:25–29. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Kanehisa M and Goto S: KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:27–30. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Merico D, Isserlin R and Bader GD: Visualizing gene-set enrichment results using the Cytoscape plug-in enrichment map. Methods Mol Biol. 781:257–277. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Joshi-Tope G, Gillespie M, Vastrik I, D'Eustachio P, Schmidt E, de Bono B, Jassal B, Gopinath GR, Wu GR, Matthews L, et al: Reactome: A knowledgebase of biological pathways. Nucleic Acid Res. 33:D428–D432. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Matthews L, Gopinath G, Gillespie M, Caudy M, Croft D, de Bono B, Garapati P, Hemish J, Hermjakob H, Jassal B, et al: Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes. Nucleic Acid Res. 37:D619–D622. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Prasad TK, Goel R, Kandasamy K, Keerthikumar S, Kumar S, Mathivanan S, Telikicherla D, Raju R, Shafreen B, Venugopal A, et al: Human protein reference database-2009 update. Nucleic Acid Res. 37:D767–D772. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Somwar R, Erdjument-Bromage H, Larsson E, Shum D, Lockwood WW, Yang G, Sander C, Ouerfelli O, Tempst PJ, Djaballah H and Varmus HE: Superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) is a target for a small molecule identified in a screen for inhibitors of the growth of lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:16375–16380. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Schaefer CF, Anthony K, Krupa S, Buchoff J, Day M, Hannay T and Buetow KH: PID: The pathway interaction database. Nucleic Acid Res. 37:D674–D679. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Kohl M, Wiese S and Warscheid B: Cytoscape: software for visualization and analysis of biological networks. Methods Mol Biol. 696:291–303. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

De Craene B and Berx G: Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 13:97–110. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Valdes F, Alvarez AM, Locascio A, Vega S, Herrera B, Fernández M, Benito M, Nieto MA and Fabregat I: The epithelial mesenchymal transition confers resistance to the apoptotic effects of transforming growth factor Beta in fetal rat hepatocytes. Mol Cancer Res. 1:68–78. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Ansieau S, Bastid J, Doreau A, Morel AP, Bouchet BP, Thomas C, Fauvet F, Puisieux I, Doglioni C, Piccinin S, et al: Induction of EMT by twist proteins as a collateral effect of tumor-promoting inactivation of premature senescence. Cancer Cell. 14:79–89. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, Brooks M, Reinhard F, Zhang CC, Shipitsin M, et al: The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 133:704–715. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Roy R, Yang J and Moses MA: Matrix metalloproteinases as novel biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in human cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27:5287–5297. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T: Gelatinases (MMP-2 and −9) and their natural inhibitors as prognostic indicators in solid cancers. Biochimie. 87:287–297. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Deryugina EI and Quigley JP: Pleiotropic roles of matrix metalloproteinases in tumor angiogenesis: Contrasting, overlapping and compensatory functions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1803:103–120. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Gialeli C, Theocharis AD and Karamanos NK: Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression and their pharmacological targeting. FEBS J. 278:16–27. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Carmeliet P and Jain RK: Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature. 473:298–307. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Viola M, Vigetti D, Genasetti A, Rizzi M, Karousou E, Moretto P, Clerici M, Bartolini B, Pallotti F, De Luca G and Passi A: Molecular control of the hyaluronan biosynthesis. Connect Tissue Res. 49:111–114. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Huang D, Casale GP, Tian J, Lele SM, Pisarev VM, Simpson MA and Hemstreet GP III: Udp-glucose dehydrogenase as a novel field-specific candidate biomarker of prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 126:315–327. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Chen Y, Koppaka V, Thompson DC and Vasiliou V: Focus on molecules: ALDH1A1: From lens and corneal crystallin to stem cell marker. Exp Eye Res. 102:105–106. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Kiefer FW, Orasanu G, Nallamshetty S, Brown JD, Wang H, Luger P, Qi NR, Burant CF, Duester G and Plutzky J: Retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 1 coordinates hepatic gluconeogenesis and lipid metabolism. Endocrinology. 153:3089–3099. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Wootan MG, Bernlohr DA and Storch J: Mechanism of fluorescent fatty acid transfer from adipocyte fatty acid binding protein to membranes. Biochemistry. 32:8622–8627. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Karakas SE, Almario RU and Kim K: Serum fatty acid binding protein 4, free fatty acids, and metabolic risk markers. Metabolism. 58:1002–1007. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Long JZ and Cravatt BF: The metabolic serine hydrolases and their functions in mammalian physiology and disease. Chem Rev. 111:6022–6063. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Nomura DK, Long JZ, Niessen S, Hoover HS, Ng SW and Cravatt BF: Monoacylglycerol lipase regulates a fatty acid network that promotes cancer pathogenesis. Cell. 140:49–61. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2016
Volume 12 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Shen X, Yue M, Meng F, Zhu J, Zhu X and Jiang Y: Microarray analysis of differentially-expressed genes and linker genes associated with the molecular mechanism of colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett 12: 3250-3258, 2016.
APA
Shen, X., Yue, M., Meng, F., Zhu, J., Zhu, X., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Microarray analysis of differentially-expressed genes and linker genes associated with the molecular mechanism of colorectal cancer. Oncology Letters, 12, 3250-3258. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5122
MLA
Shen, X., Yue, M., Meng, F., Zhu, J., Zhu, X., Jiang, Y."Microarray analysis of differentially-expressed genes and linker genes associated with the molecular mechanism of colorectal cancer". Oncology Letters 12.5 (2016): 3250-3258.
Chicago
Shen, X., Yue, M., Meng, F., Zhu, J., Zhu, X., Jiang, Y."Microarray analysis of differentially-expressed genes and linker genes associated with the molecular mechanism of colorectal cancer". Oncology Letters 12, no. 5 (2016): 3250-3258. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5122