miR-211 regulates the expression of RRM2 in tumoral metastasis and recurrence in colorectal cancer patients with a k-ras gene mutation
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 19, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8295
- Pages: 8107-8117
Abstract
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third-leading cause of cancer-associated mortalities in Taiwan (1). The majority of Taiwanese patients with CRC (60–70%) present with stage II–IV disease at initial diagnosis (2,3). Among newly diagnosed cases, ~20–25% of patients have advanced disease with distant metastases (2,3). Recurrence occurs in ~30% of patients with advanced CRC, even following curative resection (2). Patients with stage I and II CRC have an 86–95% five-year survival rate, whereas those with stage III and IV metastatic diseases have five-year survival rates of ~67 and ~12%, respectively (3). In a previous study by the present authors, it was reported that the genetic background of Taiwanese patients with CRC was different from that of Caucasian patients with CRC (4). In the study, ~33.8% of tumor tissues in Taiwanese patients with CRC contained Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutations. This figure is close to that reported in Asia but significantly lower compared with the values reported in western countries (70–80%) (5). Therefore, studies of the dynamic nature of molecular signatures in CRC are required to determine the prognosis of patients.
Ribonucleotide reductase (RR) is a highly regulated rate-limiting enzyme that is used in the conversion of ribonucleoside diphosphate to 2′-deoxyribonucleoside diphosphate (6), and it is essential for DNA synthesis (6,7). In humans, one large subunit (M1) and two small subunits (RRM2 and p53R2) of RR have been identified (6,7). Although the protein sequence of the two small RR subunits, p53R2 and RRM2, show 80% similarity, their biological function is markedly different (7). Previous reports demonstrated that the regulation of RRM2 and p53R2 might play a critical role in the invasion potential of cancer cells and the establishment of the metastatic phenotype (8,9). Research also suggested that RRM2 might potentially serve as a biomarker for predicting aggressive CRC, with poor survivability and progression-free survival (10). Inhibition of RR activity has been tested as a potential therapy in anticancer settings (11). Therefore, the overexpression of RRM2 has an important role in the pathogenesis of CRC.
Research has suggested that microRNAs (miRNAs), which are small, noncoding RNAs, modulate gene expression by degrading mRNA and/or inhibiting protein translation (12). The dysregulation of miRNA has been implicated in numerous processes during tumoral progression (12). In previous reports by the present authors, it was demonstrated that different miRNAs were involved in the pathogenesis in CRC, depending on the presence or absence of an APC gene mutation (5,13–15). For example, miR-224 suppressed the migration of CRC cells by targeting cell division cycle 42 in patients with CRC and an APC gene mutation (13). It was also demonstrated by the present authors that the downregulation of let-7a-5p in sera and tumor tissues of patients with CRC could be used to predict lymph node metastasis and disease prognosis (14). In addition, the present authors demonstrated that let-7a appeared to regulate the expression of miR-21 (15). miR-21 has oncogene-like activity and is highly expressed in several types of cancer (16). In a recent study, it was also found that patients with APC mutations and high miR-21 expression had lower APC gene expression and exhibited poorer overall survival (OS) rates compared with patients with APC mutations and low miR-21 expression, APC wild-type and high miR-21 expression, and APC wild-type and high miR-21 expression (5). The same study demonstrated that the downregulation of APC gene expression was associated not only with expression of the APC gene mutation but also with upregulation of miR-21 (5). Based on these findings, the present authors speculated that the expression of the p53, APC and k-ras genes may be associated with miRNA expression in patients with CRC.
The k-ras gene is a member of the ras gene family (H-, K- and N-ras) (17). Oncogenic k-ras mutations have been detected in several types of cancer (e.g., lung, colon and pancreatic) (17). Additionally, ~20–50% of primary colorectal tumors contain oncogenic k-ras mutations (18). Recent clinical trials verified that the k-ras gene mutation was associated with cetuximab resistance in patients with metastatic CRC (19). However, whether mutant k-ras genes affect survival rates, tumoral recurrence and drug resistance in patients with CRC and who receive adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. Previous research identified a positive association between RRM2 and k-ras genes, showing that re-expressed k-ras genes in a HKe3 colon cancer cell line induced RRM2 expression (20). Based on these findings, we suggest that the interaction of k-ras with RRM2 may play a role in survival rates and drug resistance in CRC patients.
In the present study, it was hypothesized that the downregulation of miR-211 would induce RRM2 expression and promote tumorigenesis in CRC and that the expression levels of miR-211, p53R2 and RRM2 may be used as biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes and tumoral recurrence in CRC. It was also hypothesized that p53/APC/k-ras gene mutations would result in overexpression of RRM2 and have a role in disease progression and clinical outcomes of patients with CRC. Therefore, the associations between miR-211, p53R2 and RRM2 gene expression and clinical outcomes in CRC patients with and without p53/APC/k-ras mutations were analyzed.
Patients and methods
Study population
CRC tumor tissue samples were collected from 192 non-selected patients who underwent surgical resection for CRC at the Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) between December 2011 and December 2013 (14). The acquisition of the samples and their subsequent examination were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University (Taipei, Taiwan). Informed written consent was obtained from all the patients and/or guardians prior to the use of the resected specimens.
None of the participants had a previous history of cancer. The clinical stages and pathological features of primary tumors were defined according to the criteria of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (https://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/Pages/What-is-Cancer-Staging.aspx). A total of 33 of the 192 patients with stage IV disease and distant metastasis were enrolled in the present study, of which 5 had lung metastasis, 16 had liver metastasis, 9 had peritoneum metastasis and 3 had para-aortic lymph nodes metastasis. All of the patients had oligometastatic disease and had undergone surgery but not chemotherapy. Postoperative follow-up visits were scheduled every three months thereafter during the first two years, then every six months thereafter, or more frequently if needed. Survival and recurrence were followed up in all the patients in the present study.
The CRC tissues and paired non-tumor tissues from the aforementioned patients were obtained from the Tissue Bank of Taipei Medical University (Taipei. Taiwan) between December 2011 and December 2013. In the present study, a total 192 patients were enrolled, including 90 females and 102 males, age ranging from 40 to 90 years old. A pathologist confirmed that >95% of the cells were tumor cells based on H&E-stained frozen sections. The normal tissues were used as a control. These tissue samples were obtained from the same patient and were checked by a pathologist.
Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) -based detection of miR-211
Total RNA was extracted from the tumor tissue samples or sera of the patients with CRC using TRIzol (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The expression of mature miRNA was detected by a TaqMan miRNA assay (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc; catalog no. 4427975; sequence; UUCCCUUUGUCAUCCUUCGCCU) and normalized relative to U6B using the 2−ΔΔCq method (21). All TaqMan PCRs were performed in triplicate. The PCR reaction was conducted with the following conditions: starting with 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min). The definition of high and low expression of miR-211 was dependent on the mean value of the expression of these genes in the normal tissues of the patients. High expression was defined as expression levels higher than the mean expression in non-tumor tissues. Low expression was defined as expression levels lower than he mean expression in normal tissues. The mean expression level of miR-211 in normal colon tissue samples was 20.21±10.81. The PCR-based detection of miR-211 was conducted as described in a previous report by the present authors (14).
Detection of p53R2 and RRM2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens were sectioned at a thickness of 3 µm. All the sections were deparaffinized in xylene, sequentially rehydrated through serial dilutions of alcohol, and washed in phosphate-buffered saline. The sections used for p53R2 and RRM2 detection were immersed in a citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and heated in a microwave oven twice for 5 min. Mouse anti-p53R2 (catalog no. SC-137174) and RRM2 (catalog no. SC-81850) monoclonal antibodies (all 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) were used as the primary antibodies. The conventional streptavidin peroxidase method (DAKO; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA; LSAB Kit K675) was performed to develop signals according to the manufacturer's protocol and the cells were counter-stained with hematoxylin. The details of the protocol used have been described previously (22). Negative controls that did not include the primary antibodies were also prepared.
A total of three observers independently evaluated the results and scored the percentage of positive expression in the samples. In each specimen, the cells that positively stained for anti-p53R2 and RRM2 antibodies were recorded as a percentage (%) using a labeling index, and the measurements were calculated. The scores were as follows: 0, no positive staining; +, from 1 to 10% positive cells; ++, from 11 to 50% positive cells; and +++, >50% positive cells. Among the 192 CRC patients, 99 samples were negative for p53R2 protein expression. None of the patients were scored +, 57 were scored ++ and 36 were scored +++. For RRM2 protein expression, 96 patients were negative. None of the patients were scored +, 35 were scored ++ and 61 were +++. The scores of ++ and +++ were considered to represent high immunostaining, and scores of 0 and + were classified as low immunostaining.
Mutation analysis of APC, k-ras and p53 genes
Genomic DNA was prepared from 192 frozen CRC tissues using standard proteinase K digestion and phenol/chloroform extraction following homogenization. Mutations in the APC, p53 and k-ras genes were determined by direct sequencing of PCR products. The detailed protocol used has been described previously (23). The target sequences were amplified in a 50 µl reaction mixture containing 20 pmol of each primer, 2.5 U Taq polymerase (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan), 0.5 mmol/l dNTPs, 5 µl PCR reaction buffer and 1 µl genomic DNA as the template. Oligonucleotide primers were used to amplify the mutation cluster region of the APC, p53 and k-ras genes. A total of four sets of oligonucleotide primers were used for APC: Forward, 5′-CAGACTTATTGTGTAGAAGA-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTCCTGAAGAAAATTCAACA-3′; forward, 5′-AGGGTTCTAGTTTATCTTCA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCTGCTTGGTGGCATGGTTT-3′; forward, 5′-GGCATTATAAGCCCCAGTGA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAATGGCTCATCGAGGCTCA-3′; forward, 5′-ACTCCAGATGGATTTTCTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGCTGGCTTTTTTGCTTTAC-3′. A total of three sets of oligonucleotide primers were used for p53: Forward, 5′-TGCCCTGACTTTCAACTCTG-3′ and reverse: 5′-AGTTGCAAACCAGACCTCAGG-3′; forward, 5′-CCTGTGTTATCTCCTAGGTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCTCCTCCACCGCTTCTTGT-3′; forward, 5′-AAGGCGCACTGGCCTCATCTT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GAATCTGAGGCATAACTGCAC-3′. One set of oligonucleotide primers was used for k-ras: Forward, 5′-AGGCCTGCTGAAAATGACTGAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAAGAATGGTCCTGCACCAG-3′.
Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA)
The Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) platform was used (http://www.ingenuity.com/) to investigate associations between RRM2, p53R2 (RRM2B), KRAS, and miR-211. The platform can reveal molecular interactions according to records contained in its Ingenuity Knowledge Base. The Path Explore tool in the platform was used to identify interactions between the molecules. In total, 13 interacting proteins were identified, including 4 transcription regulators, 3 enzymes, 1 transporter, and 5 proteins with other functions. Among the proteins, BCL2, an apoptosis regulator, serves a central role by interacting with RRM2, KRAS, and miR-211.
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, software (version 13.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A chi-square test (χ2 test) was used to compare the association of p53R2 and RRM2 gene expression with clinical parameters in CRC. A total of two independent tests and k-independent nonparametric tests were used to compare the expression level of miR-211 in the presence of different clinical parameters in CRC. A probability value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and the log-rank test was used to evaluate the differences in survival curves of patients with and without p53R2 and RRM2 expression. In the present study, survival was defined as the time from the date of the surgical intervention until 31st July 2016.
Results
RRM2/p53R2 expression is associated with tumoral metastasis in CRC
The p53R2 gene was expressed in 93 of 192 (48.4%) patients, and hRRM2 was expressed in 96 of 192 (50.0%) patients. Both proteins were expressed in CRC tumor cells (Fig. 1). As shown in Table I, the expression level of p53R2 was significantly lower in patients with distant metastasis and late-stage CRC compared with patients with no metastasis and early-stage CRC (M factor, distant metastasis, P=0.002; stage, P=0.008; Table I). No additional associations were identified between p53R2 expression and other clinical parameters (Table I). In addition, RRM2 expression was significantly higher in patients with lymph node metastasis and late-stage CRC compared with patients with no metastasis and early-stage CRC (N factor, lymph node metastasis, P=0.001; stage, P=0.001). No additional associations were detected between RRM2 and other clinical parameters (Table I).
Table I.Association of p53R2 and RRM2 expression and clinical parameters in tumor tissues of patients with colorectal cancer. |
Effect of RRM2 and p53R2 expression on OS and DFS in CRC
We hypothesized that the expression levels of p53R2 and RRM2 would contribute to tumoral progression and metastasis in CRC and that the expression of p53R2 and RRM2 would be associated with OS and DFS in CRC. As indicated by the results of the Kaplan-Meier analysis, p53R2 protein expression levels exhibited no association with OS or DFS in CRC (OS, P=0.488; DFS, P=0.915 for; Fig. 2). However, the results of the Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that RRM2 protein expression was associated with OS and DFS in patients with CRC (OS, P<0.0001; DFS, P=0.002; Fig. 2). Patients with low RRM2 expression had longer OS and DFS compared patients with high RRM2 expression. Therefore, it is suggested that RRM2 expression has potential to be a prognostic and tumoral recurrence biomarker in patients with CRC.
RRM2 expression is associated with the k-ras gene mutation but not with p53/APC gene mutations in patients with CRC
The associations between p53R2 and RRM2 expression and gene mutations (APC, p53 and k-ras) in patients with CRC were further analyzed. As indicated in Table II, the expression of p53R2 and RRM2 was not associated with APC or P53 gene mutations in tumors of patients with CRC. A positive association was observed between RRM2 protein expression and the k-ras gene mutation. However, there was no association between p53R2 expression and the k-ras mutation. In addition, the expression of RRM2 was higher in patients with the k-ras gene mutation compared with patients with wild-type k-ras (P=0.008; Table II).
Table II.Association between p53R2 and RRM2 expression and APC, p53, and k-ras gene mutations in patients with colorectal cancer. |
Effect of RRM2 expression on OS and DFS of patients with CRC according to k-ras status
The results indicated that RRM2 expression was associated with the k-ras gene mutation. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the effects of RRM2 expression on OS or DFS in CRC would differ among patients, depending on the presence or absence of k-ras mutations. The results of the Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that RRM2 expression was associated with clinical outcomes in patients with wild-type k-ras (P=0.001) and those with k-ras gene mutations (P=0.031) (all patients, P<0.0001; Fig. 3A-C). The association between RRM2 expression and DFS in patients with and without k-ras mutations was also analyzed. The results revealed that hRRM2 expression was associated with overall DFS in patients with wild-type k-ras (P=0.009) and in those with the k-ras gene mutation (P=0.048) (all patients, P=0.002; Fig. 3D-F). Therefore, it is suggested that RRM2 is not associated with the k-ras gene status but that RRM2 expression may have potential as a prognostic and recurrence marker in patients with CRC.
miR-211 expression negatively regulates RRM2 expression in patients with CRC and k-ras gene mutations
The association of miR-211 with RRM2 expression in tumor tissue samples of patients with CRC was analyzed. The levels of miR-211 expression in tumor tissue samples from patients with CRC are illustrated in Fig. 4. As indicated in Table III, the level of miR-211 was significantly negatively associated with RRM2 protein expression in patients with CRC and k-ras gene mutation (P<0.0001) but not in patients with CRC and wild-type k-ras gene (P=0.634). In addition, miR-211 expression was negatively associated with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and cancer stage (all P<0.0001; Table III). Patients with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and late-stage disease had lower miR-211 expression compared with those with early-stage disease and without metastasis (Table III).
Table III.Association of miR-211 expression levels and clinical parameters in tumor tissues of patients with colorectal cancer. |
Effect of miR-211 expression on OS and DFS in CRC
It was hypothesized that miR-211 expression would be associated with clinical outcomes in patients with CRC, depending on the k-ras gene status of the patient. As indicated by the results of the Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no association between OS and miR-211 expression in overall patients (P=0.488; Fig. 5A) and patients with the wild-type k-ras gene (P=0.400; Fig. 5B), but had effects in patients with k-ras gene mutations (P=0.003, Fig. 5C). In addition, there was no association between miR-211 and DFS in all patients (P=0.255; Fig. 5D) and patients with the wild-type k-ras gene (P=0.744; Fig. 5E). However, miR-211 expression had effects on OS and DFS in patients with CRC and k-ras gene mutations (Fig. 5C and F), patients with high miR-211 expression having longer OS and DFS compared with patients with low miR-211 expression (OS, P=0.003; Fig. 5C; DFS, P=0.004; Fig. 5F).
The effects of miR-211 and RRM2 expression on OS and DFS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method is presented in Fig. 6. The results indicated that patients with CRC and high RRM2/low miR-211 expression and high RRM2/high miR-211 expression had significantly poorer OS (P<0.0001; Fig. 6A) and DFS (P=0.015; Fig. 6B) compared with those with low RRM2/high miR-211 expression and low RRM2/low miR-211 expression. A shown by the results of the Cox regression analysis, patients with late-stage disease and high RRM2 expression had a higher hazard ratio compared with patients with early-stage disease and low RRM2 expression (Table IV). miR-211 expression and the presence of the k-ras mutation showed no significant different with overall survival of patients with CRC. These observations demonstrated that the expression of RRM2 in tumor tissues rather than the expression of miR-211 could be used as an independent biomarker to predict OS in CRC (Table IV). It is suggested that a combination of miR-211 and RRM2 expression could be used as a prognostic and tumoral recurrence marker only in patients with CRC and the k-ras gene mutation.
Table IV.Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the combined effects of RRM2, miR-211, distant metastasis, tumor stage and k-ras gene mutation on the overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer. |
Discussion
Previous reports demonstrated that patients with high RRM2 expression had poor prognoses and tumoral recurrence in several types of cancer, including hepatocellular cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, CRC and lung cancer (9,22,24–26). In the present study, it was detected that RRM2 expression in tumor tissues of patients with CRC and lymph node metastasis was significantly higher compared with patients without lymph node metastasis (Table I). In addition, patients with high RRM2 expression in tumors had poor DFS (Fig. 2). A previous study by Maftouh et al (27) on SUIT2-007 and SUIT2-028, subclones of a human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line (SUIT-2), reported that miR-211 targeted RRM2 and modulated its sensitivity to gemcitabine. In the present study, the expression of miR-211 was negatively associated with RRM2 expression in tumor tissues of patients with CRC and k-ras gene mutation (Table III). Tumoral recurrence was lower in patients with CRC and k-ras mutation and high miR-211 expression compared with patients with the k-ras mutation and low miR-211 expression. Therefore, it was proposed that the level of RRM2 expression and upstream expression of miR-211 in tumor tissues of patients with CRC may be useful biomarkers to predict tumoral metastasis and tumoral recurrence, particularly in patients with the k-ras gene mutation.
A previous study reported that RRM2 cooperated with a variety of oncogenes to promote cell transformation and tumorigenesis in cell model experiments (28). In addition, human and mouse cell models demonstrated that RRM2 played a critical role in enhancing the invasive potential of tumor cells (28–31). In the present study, RRM2 expression was higher in lymph nodes invasion groups compared with the group without invasion (Table I). Therefore, it was suggested that RRM2 expression in patients with CRC may be associated with increased metastasis of tumor cells.
As shown in a previous study, miR-211 modulated gemcitabine activity and inhibited the invasive ability of cancer cells by negatively regulating the expression of RRM2 (27). The downregulation of let-7a and miR-211 was associated with the overexpression of k-ras in 9, 10-dimethyl-1,2-benz [a]anthracene-induced mouse skin tumorigenesis (32). In the present study, the expression of miR-211 was negatively associated with RRM2 expression in tumor tissues of patients with CRC and k-ras mutation. Patients with low miR-211 expression and high RRM2 expression had poor DFS, particularly those with the k-ras mutation. Therefore, it was suggested that the k-ras gene mutation may be associated with downregulation of miR-211 and that this results in the overexpression of RRM2 and the induction of CRC tumorigenesis.
A meta-analysis indicated that the k-ras mutation was present in 1,364 of 4,687 (29.10%) patients with CRC (33). This result is similar to the results found in the present study (25.5%; Table II). Previous studies reported an association between k-ras gene mutation and clinicopathological characteristics (34–37). However, the association remains unclear, where some reports demonstrated that the k-ras gene mutation appeared to be associated with clinical outcomes, while other studies found no evidence to suggest that it could be used to predict clinical outcomes (34–37). The present study demonstrated that patients with low miR-211 expression had poor DFS, as did patients with the k-ras gene mutation. By contrast, the wild-type k-ras gene was not associated with poor DFS. A negative association was detected between RRM2 and miR-211 expression in patients with CRC and k-ras gene mutation (Table III). These findings indicate that a combination of k-ras gene mutation and miR-211 and RRM2 expression, may be a useful biomarker to monitor tumoral recurrence in CRC. However, k-ras alone cannot be used as a biomarker.
In the present study, the IPA platform was used to investigate the associations between RRM2, p53R2, (RRM2B), k-ras and miR-211. The platform can reveal molecular interactions between these genes based on data recorded in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base. The Path Explore tool in IPA was used to identify interactions between the molecules (Fig. 7). The following 13 interacting proteins were identified: Transcription regulators (n=4), enzymes (n=3), transporters (n=1) and proteins (n=5) with other functions. One of the proteins identified, Bcl2 is an apoptosis regulator, and it plays a central role by interacting with RRM2, k-ras and miR-211. The associations of these 13 target genes (Fig. 7) and the clinical application of these genes need to be examined in future studies.
In conclusion, it was detected that RRM2 and p53R2 protein expression was associated with lymph node and distant metastasis in CRC. Additionally, the expression level of RRM2 was regulated by miR-211. The protein expression of miR-211 and RRM2 but not that of p53R2 could be used to monitor metastasis, OS, and DFS in CRC, particularly in patients with CRC and k-ras gene mutation. The present authors propose that the activation of the k-ras gene may downregulate the expression of mir-211, resulting in RRM2 overexpression and the induction of tumoral recurrence in patients with CRC and k-ras gene mutation.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was supported by grants from the Health and Welfare Surcharge of Tobacco Products (grant no. MOHW105-TDU-B-212-134001) and the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan (grant nos. MOHW103-TD-B-111-01 and MOHW103-TDU-B-212-113001).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
YWC designed the study and wrote the paper. YWC, CCC, KTY, CCH and NYH designed the experiments, wrote the paper, and prepared the figures. CCL, CHW, KTY, PLW and CCH collected the colorectal tumor samples and clinical data. TWK evaluated the immunohistochemistry results. KCH analyzed the molecular pathway using the Ingenuity Pathways Analysis platform. All the authors gave their approval for the manuscript to be submitted for publication.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The acquisition of the samples and their subsequent examination were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University (Taipei, Taiwan). Informed written consent was obtained from all the patients and/or guardians prior to the use of the resected specimens.
Consent for publication
All identifying information is removed.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Su SY, Huang JY, Jian ZH, Ho CC, Lung CC and Liaw YP: Mortality of colorectal cancer in Taiwan, 1971–2010: Temporal changes and age-period-cohort analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 27:1665–1672. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Taiwan Cancer Registry. http://tcr.cph.ntu.edu.tw/main.php?Page=N1 | |
Chiang CJ, Lo WC, Yang YW, You SL, Chen CJ and Lai MS: Incidence and survival of adult cancer patients in Taiwan, 2002–2012. J Formos Med Assoc. 115:1076–1088. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen TH, Chang SW, Huang CC, Wang KL, Yeh KT, Liu CN, Lee H, Lin CC and Cheng YW: The prognostic significance of APC gene mutation and miR-21 expression in advanced-stage colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 15:1367–1374.. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fodde R, Smits R and Clevers H: APC, signal transduction and genetic instability in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 1:55–67. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reichard P: Ribonucleotide reductases: The evolution of allosteric regulation. Arch Biochem Biophy. 397:149–155. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tanaka H, Arakawa H, Yamaguchi T, Shiraishi K, Fukuda S, Matsui K, Takei Y and Nakamura Y: Ribonucleotide reductase gene involved in a p53-dependent cell-cycle checkpoint for DNA damage. Nature. 404:42–49. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fan H, Villegas C and Wright JA: Ribonucleotide reductase R2 component is a novel malignancy determinant that cooperates with activated oncogenes to determine transformation and malignant potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:14036–14040. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu X, Zhou B, Xue L, Shih J, Tye K, Lin W, Qi C, Chu P, Un F, Wen W and Yen Y: Metastasis-suppressing potential of ribonucleotide reductase small subunit p53R2 in human cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 12:6337–6344. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu X, Zhang H, Lai L, Wang X, Loera S, Xue L, He H, Zhang K, Hu S, Huang Y, et al: Ribouncleotide reductase small subunit M2 serves as a prognostic biomarker and predicts poor survival of colorectal cancers. Clin Sci (Lond). 124:567–578. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cerqueira NM, Pereira S, Fernandes PA and Ramos MJ: Overview of ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors: An appealing target in anti-tumour therapy. Curr Med Chem. 12:1283–1294. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Slack FJ and Weidhaas JB: MicroRNA in cancer prognosis. N Engl J Med. 359:2720–2722. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ke TW, Hsu HL, Wu YH, Chen WT, Cheng YW and Cheng CW: MicroRNA-224 suppresses colorectal cancer cell migration by targeting Cdc42. Dis Markers. 2014:6171502014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu TP, Huang CC, Yeh KT, Ke TW, Wei PL and Cheng YW: Down-regulation of let-7a-5p predicts lymph node metastasis and prognosis impact on chemotherapy of colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol. 25:429–434. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen X and Qin Z: Post-transcriptional regulation by microRNA-21 and let-7a microRNA in paediatric cholesteatoma. J Int Med Res. 39:2110–2118. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pfeffer SR, Yang CH and Pfeffer LM: The role of miR-21 in cancer. Drug Dev Res. 76:270–277. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang F and Cheong JK: The renewed battle against RAS-mutant cancers. Cell Mol Life Sci. 73:1845–1858. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rui YY, Zhang D, Zhou ZG, Wang C, Yang L, Yu YY and Chen HN: Can K-ras Gene mutation be utilized as prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy? A meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 8:e779012013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Normanno N, Tejpar S, Morgillo F, De Luca A, Van Cutsem E and Ciardiello F: Implications for KRAS status and EGFR-targeted therapies in metastatic CRC. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 6:519–527. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshida Y, Tsunoda T, Doi K, Tanaka Y, Fujimoto T, Machida T, Ota T, Koyanagi M, Takashima Y, Sasazuki T, et al: KRAS-mediated up-regulation of RRM2 expression is essential for the proliferation of colorectal cancer cell lines. Anticancer Res. 31:2535–2539. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hsu NY, Wu JY, Liu X, Yen Y, Chen CY, Chou MC, Lin CH, Lee H and Cheng YW: Expression status of ribonucleotide reductase small subunits hRRM2/p53R2 as prognostic biomarkers in stage i and ii non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 31:3475–3481. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen IC, Lee KH, Hsu YH, Wang WR, Chen CM and Cheng YW: Expression pattern and clinicopathological relevance of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1/tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase protein in colorectal cancer. Dis Markers. 2016:81697242016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang Y, Liu X, Wang YH, Yeh SD, Chen CL, Nelson RA, Chu P, Wilson T and Yen Y: The prognostic value of ribonucleotide reductase small subunit M2 in predicting recurrence for prostate cancers. Urol Oncol. 32:51.e9–e19. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wei CH, Gorgan TR, Elashoff DA, Hines OJ, Farrell JJ and Donahue TR: A meta-analysis of gemcitabine biomarkers in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancers. Pancreas. 42:1303–1310. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang L, Huang J and Jiang M: RRM2 computational phosphoprotein network construction and analysis between no-tumor hepatitis/cirrhotic liver tissues and human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Cell Physiol Biochem. 26:303–310. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maftouh M, Avan A, Funel N, Frampton AE, Fiuji H, Pelliccioni S, Castellano L, Galla V, Peters GJ and Giovannetti E: miR-211 modulates gemcitabine activity through downregulation of ribonucleotide reductase and inhibits the invasive behavior of pancreatic cancer cells. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 33:384–393. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhong Z, Cao Y, Yang S and Zhang S: Overexpression of RRM2 in gastric cancer cell promotes their invasiveness via AKT/NF-κB signaling pathway. Pharmazie. 71:280–284. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Fang Z, Gong C, Liu H, Zhang X, Mei L, Song M, Qiu L, Luo S, Zhu Z, Zhang R, et al: E2F1 promote the aggressiveness of human colorectal cancer by activating the ribonucleotide reductase small subunit M2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 464:407–415. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou BS, Tsai P, Ker R, Tsai J, Ho R, Yu J, Shih J and Yen Y: Overexpression of transfected human ribonucleotide reductase M2 subunit in human cancer cells enhances their invasive potential. Clin Exp Metastasis. 16:43–49. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Duxbury MS and Whang EE: RRM2 induces NF-kB-dependent MMP-9 activation and enhances cellular invasiveness. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 354:190–196. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tiwari P, Sahay S, Pandey M, Qadri SS and Gupta KP: Preventive effects of butyric acid, nicotinamide, calcium glucarate alone or in combination during the 7, 12-dimethylbenz anthracene induced mouse skin tumorigenesis via modulation of K-Ras-PI3K-AKTpathway and associated micro RNAs. Biochimie. 121:112–122. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ren J, Li G, Ge J, Li X and Zhao Y: Is K-ras gene mutation a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 55:913–923. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bazan V, Migliavacca M, Zanna I, Tubiolo C, Grassi N, Latteri MA, La Farina M, Albanese I, Dardanoni G, Salerno S, et al: Specific codon 13 K-ras mutations are predictive of clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients, whereas codon 12 K-ras mutations are associated with mucinous histotype. Ann Oncol. 13:1438–1446. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Conlin A, Smith G, Carey FA, Wolf CR and Steele RJ: The prognostic significance of K-ras, p53 and APC mutations in colorectal carcinoma. Gut. 54:1283–1286. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pricolo VE, Finkelstein SD, Wu TT, Keller G, Bakker A, Swalsky PA and Bland KI: Prognostic value of TP53 and K-ras-2 mutational analysis in stage III carcinoma of the colon. Am J Surg. 171:41–46. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Andersen SN, Lovig T, Breivik J, Lund E, Gaudernack G, Meling GI and Rognum TO: K-ras mutations and prognosis in large-bowel carcinomas. Scand J Gastroenterol. 32:62–69. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |