Pelvic tumors with normal-appearing shapes of ovaries and uterus presenting as an emergency (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 23, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.692
- Pages: 10-14
Abstract
1. Introduction
Abdominopelvic pain with an associated pelvic mass is a common emergency. These patients create a management dilemma for most emergency physicians. This problem usually stems from the inability of the physical examination to reliably differentiate between a potential surgical problem (i.e., torsion of an enlarged ovary, pelvic abscess) and a non-surgical etiology (i.e., ovarian cyst, uterine myoma). Ultrasonograpy (US), magnetic resonance (MR) and/or computed tomography (CT) are the gold standard imaging modalities used to differentiate pelvic masses in female patients presenting with abdominopelvic pain as an emergency.
Ovarian tumors and uterine myoma constitute the most common masses in the female pelvis (1,2). The torsion of enlarged ovaries is one of the most common surgical gynecological emergencies (1). The differential diagnosis includes twisted exophytic ovarian fibroma, pedunculated myoma, peritoneal lipoma and accessory ovary although it should be noted that these conditions rarely cause acute abdominopelvic pain. The purpose of this review was to summarize the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses associated with acute abdominal pain when normal-appearing ovaries and uterus are detected.
2. Ovarian fibroma
Ovarian fibromas are the most commonly encountered subtype of sex cord-stromal tumors, accounting for 4–5% of all ovarian tumors (3–6). It is well known that MR imaging is useful in diagnosing ovarian fibromas, due to the characteristically low T1- and T2-weighted signal intensities of the tumors, caused by the presence of densely packed connective tissue (3–6). The main differential diagnosis of a solid adnexal mass with T2 hypointensity includes a uterine pedunculated myoma and an ovarian fibroma. In a retrospective analysis, crescent-shaped ovarian tissue may be detected along the periphery of the tumor in approximately 50% of ovarian fibroma cases and a normal-appearing ovary closely attached to the tumor in certain lesions may be misdiagnosed as a subserosal leiomyoma (5–8). Thus, careful evaluation of the ipsilateral ovary may aid the differentiation between ovarian fibroma and uterine leiomyoma. The cystic degeneration of fibromas has been reported to lead to the pre-operative misdiagnosis of malignant ovarian epithelial and collision tumors in certain cases (5,6). Larger or twisted tumors may result in various MR imaging findings which reflect the degenerative changes, including cystic degeneration, edematous changes, hemorrhagic infarction or necrosis as a result of torsion and myxomatous changes (4,9). Oh et al (5) reported that the ipsilateral ovaries were identified in half of the ovarian fibroma cases included in the study. The ovaries had a preserved, normal-appearing ovoid shape, suggesting the exophytic growth of the fibroma from the periphery of the ovary. Considering the high incidence (50%) of a long pedicle in ovarian fibromas reported by certain groups (5,6,10), the exophytic growth of fibromas is not uncommon. Torsion may occur incidentally (Fig. 1).
The remaining ovary on the same side as the fibroma is commonly detected on MR imaging, especially in premenopausal women, as is the exophytic growth of fibroma from the periphery of the ovary. Careful evaluation of the relationship between the ipsilateral ovary and an adnexal mass may be a significant clue in the differential diagnosis of ovarian fibroma from uterine leiomyoma, in addition to the characteristic morphology and signal intensities (5).
3. Fat-containing tumors in the pelvic cavity
There are numerous types of fat-containing lesions which may be found in the intraperitoneal cavity and retroperitoneal space and treatment varies according to the classification. Mesenteric panniculitis and pseudolipoma of Glisson’s capsule may be treated medically or not at all. Adrenal adenoma, myelolipoma, angiomyolipoma, ovarian teratoma and lipoma may be surgically resected when the lesions reach a large size or begin to cause symptoms, whereas liposarcoma and retroperitoneal teratoma should be resected at an earlier stage (11). Stalk torsion of a lipoma may present with acute abdominal pain and is an indication for emergency surgery (Fig. 2) (12,13).
Lipomas are commonly observed benign fat-containing soft-tissue tumors which may occur singly or, as in lipomatosis, in larger numbers, and have either a superficial or deep localization. Lipomas are mostly diagnosed in patients aged 40–60 years and, in adults, are often located in the trunk. However, previous studies have reported cases of deep lipomas located in the thorax, mediastinum, chest wall and retroperitoneum. Cases of intraperitoneal lipoma are extremely rare (12,14,15).
When visualised with US, adipose tissues, with some exceptions, are typically hyperechoic. Fat tissues in CT scans have a low attenuation, ranging from −10 to −100 Hounsfield units (HUs). However, in certain cases it is difficult to reliably identify fat tissues using CT, as the mean CT number increases if the proportion of fat in a voxel is low (11,16). Finally, MR imaging has a higher sensitivity for microscopic fat than CT and US imaging (Fig. 2) (17). In T1-weighted MR images, adipose tissue appears hyperintense and in T2-weighted fast spin and gradient-echo images, fat appears immediate- to hyperintense. MR is based on differences in the resonance frequencies of protons in different environments, in fat and water for instance, and methods such as in-phase/opposed-phase chemical shift imaging and the frequency-selective fat suppression technique mean that fat may be more reliably identified using MR images than CT or US (11,18).
Although cases of lipoma in the parietal peritoneum are rare, this type of tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients who present with an abdominal mass and acute abdomen.
4. Pedunculated myoma
Although uterine myomas are the most common type of tumor in females of reproductive age, the acute torsion of a subserosal uterine leiomyoma is a rare complication (2,19). The torsion of the vascular pedicle of a subserosal leiomyoma may cause ischemic gangrene and peritonitis (2,20,21). The diagnosis is difficult and is usually made during exploratory laparotomy.
There are a number of techniques that may be used in the identification of subserosal leiomyoma. The tumor may appear as a lesion lateral to the uterus in transvaginal US, but the pedicle of the subserous leiomyoma may be thin and invisible to US, meaning that a definitive diagnosis is rarely made using this technique (22). A CT scan may be performed as an alternative investigation and certain authors have reported signs which distinguish between ovarian and uterine masses, including a pedunculated myoma node (22,23). MR imaging is another non-invasive method used to detect and analyze uterine leiomyomas. This method is more sensitive and specific than US, has a good contrast resolution and produces a characteristic signal for uterine leiomyomas (2,21,24). Non-complicated myomas appear hypointense and homogenous in T2-weighted images and isointense in T1-weighted images compared with the myometrium (25,26). Necrotic leiomyomas, however, have a heterogeneous and hyperintense T2 signal and a hyper- or isointense T1 signal, dependent on whether the necrosis is due to hemorrhage or ischemia. MR imaging also aids diagnosis by facilitating the study of the anatomy and topography of the pelvis. Following a definitive or suspected diagnosis, surgical exploration is indicated and the lesion is typically resolved by excision (19,26).
5. Tumor within an accessory ovary
With an estimated incidence of between 1/29,000 and 1/700,000 gynecological admissions, ectopic ovarian tissue is rarely observed. It is difficult to make a narrower estimate of the incidence due to the lack of a clear and uncontroversial classification system. A definition of an accessory ovary as being in close proximity to, and having an association with, a eutopic ovary and its blood supply was proposed by Wharton (27). Accessory ovaries are commonly attached to a Fallopian tube or the ligamentous structure of the ovarian-uterine complex (28,29). Wharton also defined a supernumerary ovary as ovarian tissue which has a separate blood supply and is located at a distance from the eutopic ovaries. Supernumerary ovaries may be located at any point along the embryological migratory path of the ovarian primordium, including the mesentery, retroperitoneal space and omentum (30). Certain studies have described cases of tumors and/or their torsion arising from an accessory ovary (31,32). These tumors may preserve the normal oval shape of the ovary.
6. Pelvic hematoma
Nelson (33) reported an unusual cause of a pelvic mass caused by domestic violence. If the social history and high incidence of domestic violence had been considered, the cause of the mass may have been diagnosed earlier. Instead, the patient was tested for other diagnostic entities which occur relatively infrequently.
7. Other problems
Abdominopelvic problems which originate from the gastrointestinal tract have been documented in previous studies (34–37). Two cases with torsion of a wandering spleen detected by pelvic CT have been reported (38). In cases of acute abdomen with a palpable painful abdominal mass and the absence of the spleen from its normal location, torsion of a wandering spleen should be considered in the differential diagnosis.
8. Conclusion
The conditions discussed in this review, although extremely rare, must be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen when a palpable painful pelvic mass is present on physical and imaging examinations and the two ovaries and uterus are detected in their normal anatomical locations on radiological examination. An accurate diagnosis may be most frequently made at the time of exploratory laparotomy.
References
Lambert M and Villa M: Gynecologic ultrasound in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 22:683–696. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gupta S and Manyonda I: Acute complications of fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 23:609–617. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bazot M, Daraï E, Nassar-Slaba J, Lafont C and Thomassin-Naggara I: Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: A review. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 32:712–723. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kitajima K, Kaji Y and Sugimura K: Usual and unusual MRI findings of ovarian fibroma: Correlation with pathologic findings. Magn Reson Med Sci. 7:43–48. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oh S, Rha S, Byun J, Lee Y, Jung S, Jung C and Kim M: MRI features of ovarian fibromas: Emphasis on their relationship to the ovary. Clin Radiol. 63:529–535. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E, Nassar-Slaba J, Cortez A, Marsault C and Bazot M: Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing between ovarian fibroma and subserous uterine leiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 31:236–242. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Troiano R, Lazzarini K, Scoutt L, Lange R, Flynn S and McCarthy S: Fibroma and fibrothecoma of the ovary: MR imaging findings. Radiology. 204:795–798. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Outwater E, Siegelman E, Talerman A and Dunton C: Ovarian fibromas and cystadenofibromas: MRI features of the fibrous component. J Magn Reson Imaging. 7:465–471. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takehara M, Saito T, Manase K, Suzuki T, Hayashi T and Kudo R: Hemorrhagic infarction of fibroma. MR imaging appearance. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 266:48–49. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sivanesaratnam V, Dutta R and Jayalakshmi P: Ovarian fibroma - clinical and histopathological characteristics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 33:243–247. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shin N, Kim M, Chung J, Chung Y, Choi J and Park Y: The differential imaging features of fat-containing tumors in the peritoneal cavity and retroperitoneum: The radiologic-pathologic correlation. Korean J Radiol. 11:333–345. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Barut I, Tarhan O, Cerci C, Ciris M and Tasliyar E: Lipoma of the parietal peritoneum: an unusual cause of abdominal pain. Ann Saudi Med. 26:388–390. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Beattie G and Irwin S: Torsion of an omental lipoma presenting as an emergency. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 147:130–131. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ozel S, Apak S, Ozercan I and Kazez A: Giant mesenteric lipoma as a rare cause of ileus in a child: Report of a case. Surg Today. 34:470–472. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sato M, Ishida H, Konno K, Komatsuda T, Naganuma H, Segawa D, Watanabe S and Ishida J: Mesenteric lipoma: report of a case with emphasis on US findings. Eur Radiol. 12:793–795. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Prasad S, Wang H, Rosas H, Menias C, Narra V, Middleton W and Heiken J: Fat-containing lesions of the liver: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 25:321–331. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim T, Murakami T, Oi H, Tsuda K, Matsushita M, Tomoda K, Fukuda H and Nakamura H: CT and MR imaging of abdominal liposarcoma. Am J Roentgenol. 166:829–833. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pereira J, Sirlin C, Pinto P and Casola G: CT and MR imaging of extrahepatic fatty masses of the abdomen and pelvis: techniques, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 25:69–85. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gaym A and Tilahun S: Torsion of pedunculated subserous myoma - a rare cause of acute abdomen. Ethiop Med J. 45:203–207. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bennett G, Slywotzky C and Giovanniello G: Gynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain: spectrum of CT findings. Radiographics. 22:785–801. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maubon A, Aubard Y, Berkane V, Camezind-Vidal M, Marès P and Rouanet J: Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor. Abdom Imaging. 28:217–225. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee J, Jeong Y, Park J and Hwang J: ‘Ovarian vascular pedicle’ sign revealing organ of origin of a pelvic mass lesion on helical CT. Am J Roentgenol. 181:131–137. 2003. | |
Roy C, Bierry G, El Ghali S, Buy X and Rossini A: Acute torsion of uterine leiomyoma: CT features. Abdom Imaging. 30:120–123. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Robert Y, Launay S, Mestdagh P, Moisan S, Boyer C, Rocourt N and Cosson M: MRI in gynecology. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 31:417–439. 2002.(In French). | |
Hricak H, Tscholakoff D, Heinrichs L, Fisher M, Dooms G, Reinhold C and Jaffe R: Uterine leiomyomas: Correlation of MR, histopathologic findings, and symptoms. Radiology. 158:385–391. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Marcotte-Bloch C, Novellas S, Buratti M, Caramella T, Chevallier P and Bruneton J: Torsion of a uterine leiomyoma: MRI features. Clin Imaging. 31:360–362. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wharton L: Two cases of supernumerary ovary and one of accessory ovary, with analysis of previously reported cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 78:1101–1119. 1959.PubMed/NCBI | |
Nichols J, Zhang X and Bieber E: Case of accessory ovary in the round ligament with associated endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 16:216–218. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Benbara A, Tigaizin A and Carbillon L: Accessory ovary in the utero-ovarian ligament: an incidental finding. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 283(Suppl 1): 123–125. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kuga T, Esato K, Takeda K, Sase M and Hoshii Y: A supernumerary ovary of the omentum with cystic change: report of two cases and review of the literature. Pathol Int. 49:566–570. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fei Ngu S, Lok Tiffany Wan H, Tam Y and Cheung V: Torsion of a tumor within an accessory ovary. Obstet Gynecol. 117:477–478. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu A, Sun J, Shao W, Jin H and Song W: Steroid cell tumors, not otherwise specified (NOS), in an accessory ovary: a case report and literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 97:260–265. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nelson S: An unusual cause of pelvic mass. Tenn Med. 94:205–207. 2001. | |
Beddy D, DeBlacam C and Mehigan B: An unusual cause of an acute abdomen - a giant colonic diverticulum. J Gastrointest Surg. 14:2016–2017. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Banerjee S, Farrell R and Lembo T: Gastroenterological causes of pelvic pain. World J Urol. 19:166–173. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Barros A, Linhares E, Valadão M, Gonçalves R, Vilhena B, Gil C and Ramos C: Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGIST): a series of case reports. Hepatogastroenterology. 58:865–868. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zighelboim I, Henao G, Kunda A, Gutierrez C and Edwards C: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting as a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol. 91:630–635. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dirican A, Burak I, Ara C, Unal B, Ozgor D and Meydanli M: Torsion of wandering spleen. Bratisl Lek Listy. 110:723–725. 2009.PubMed/NCBI |