Synergistic killing of lung cancer cells by cisplatin and radiation via autophagy and apoptosis
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 8, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2049
- Pages: 1903-1910
Abstract
Introduction
Although significant progress has been achieved in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of mortality worldwide. The overall five-year survival rate of lung cancer is only 15.9% and, at diagnosis, 15% of cases are at the local stage. However, in 22% of cases, the tumor has metastasized to the regional lymph nodes or directly invaded nearby structures and in 56% of cases, distant metastasis has occurred. Therefore, few patients have the opportunity for curative surgery and, thus, the majority of patients can rely only on radiotherapy and chemotherapy (1–3).
During the process of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, multiple changes occur in the growth arrest and death pathways (4–6). Traditionally, irradiation is considered to induce cell death mainly via apoptosis. However, more recent studies have suggested that autophagy is also important in irradiation-induced cell death, which may aid to restore and improve radiosensitivity (7). Autophagy is a highly conserved cellular process whereby intracellular organelles and long-lived proteins are degraded to maintain homeostasis (8). Autophagy has also been revealed to act as a double-edged sword in the initiation, development and metastasis of cancer. On one hand, autophagy exhibits an antitumor role (9); while on the other hand, autophagy, an adaptive response, protects tumor cells against stress. Once autophagy is inhibited, the therapeutic effect is considered to be evidently enhanced (10–20). Cisplatin, a cell cycle non-specific antineoplastic agent, is usually regarded to function as a radiosensitizer during chemoradiotherapy, as it effectively inhibits the repair of sublethal damage resulting from irradiation.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect and mechanism of the synergistic killing of lung cancer cells induced by different fractionated radiotherapy treatments, as well as in combination with cisplatin in vitro and in vivo. The results identified the optimum dose of fractionated radiotherapy and whether the combination of cisplatin may offer a promising approach for clinical application.
Materials and methods
Cell culture, antibodies and reagents
The A549 cells and the mouse Lewis lung cancer cell line were cultured in RPMI-1640 and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, respectively, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at 37°C in a CO2 incubator.
Monodansylcadaverine (MDC) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The rabbit polyclonal anti-human antibodies against microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (MAPLC3), phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) III, Beclin1, damage-regulated autophagy modulator (DRAM), B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax), caspase-3, p21, p53 and phosphorylated protein kinase B (p-AKT) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA) and the mouse polyclonal antibodies against GAPDH, peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit I was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA, USA).
Treatment protocol
The A549 cells were divided into the following four groups: Control, no treatment administered; conventional radiotherapy (CRT), five doses of 2 Gy every day; hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HRT), five doses of 2 Gy administered as 1 Gy twice a day at 4 h intervals; and CRT plus cisplatin, five doses of 2 Gy and cisplatin (3 mg/kg intraperitoneally prior to the first irradiation). The radiotherapy was performed using a deep X-ray machine operated at 180 kV/18 mA with 0.25-mm copper filters at a dose rate of 0.41 Gy/min.
MTT assay
The A549 cells were cultured in 96-well microplates and various concentrations of cisplatin (1, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 40 μM) were added to each well for 48 h. A total of 20 μl MTT solution (5 mg/ml) was then added to each well and the plates were incubated for 4 h. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader.
Colony formation assay
The cells were trypsinized, counted and plated in 60 mm petri dishes containing standard culture medium. The cells were then treated with various doses of irradiation (0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 Gy) using a 180-KVp X-ray generator at a dose rate of 0.41 Gy/min (200 kV; 18 mA) and cisplatin (5 μM) was added prior to radiation. After two weeks, the cells were stained with crystal violet and the surviving colonies of >50 cells were scored under a dissection microscope (K102-Z; AmScope, Chino, CA, USA). The surviving fraction for each treatment dose was calculated as the plating efficiency of the irradiated samples compared with that of the sham-irradiated samples. For each dose level in the three treatment groups, three independent experiments were performed and the multi-target click model of GraphPad Prism 5.0 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used to generate cell survival curves.
MDC staining
The A549 cells were seeded on coverslips overnight and, following the indicated irradiation treatments, 0.5 μM MDC was added to the cells, which were cultured for 1 h. The cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with a solution of 3.3% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. The coverslips were examined using fluorescence microscopy (Olympus XSZ-D2; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Flow cytometry analysis
For the analysis of apoptosis, the A549 cells were treated with various doses of ionizing radiation (IR), collected 24 h later and then washed three times with PBS. Next, the cells were stained using the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The number of apoptotic cells was determined by flow cytometry (FACSCanto; BD Biosciences) and analyzed using the FCS Express v2.0 software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA, USA).
Western blot analysis
The total proteins were extracted with radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer [HEPES (50 mM), NaCl (150 mM), EDTA (1 mM), EGTA (2.5 mM), NaF (10 mM), DTT (1 mM), SV (1 mM), PMSF (1 mM), NP-40 (1%) and SDS (0.1%)] (Jilin University, Changchun, China) and a 2 ml aliquot of the total proteins was mixed with 20 μl protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Next, proteins (40 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) blocked with 5% dry milk or 3% bovine serum albumin in Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20 [10 mmol/l Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mmol/l NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20] both purchased from Shanghai qcbio Science & Technologies Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies. The signals were visualized by chemiluminescence (Western Blotting Luminol Reagent: sc-2048; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and GAPDH was used as a loading control. The intensities of the protein bands were quantified using ImageJ software (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) and the ratio of specific band to control was analyzed.
Tumor-bearing mouse model and treatment protocols
Male C57BL/6 mice, weighing 20±2 g, were purchased from the Animal Center of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Beijing, China). Lewis cells (2×105 cells per mouse in 0.2 ml saline) were injected subcutaneously in the right hind leg of each mouse and the tumors were allowed to grow. When the volume of tumors had reached ~300 mm3, the mice were divided randomly into different groups of 10 mice each. Cisplatin (3 mg/kg) was intraperitoneally injected prior to the first dose of radiation. Approval for animal experimentation was obtained from the University Animal Care Committee of Jilin University (Changchun, China).
The four groups of mice were treated as aforementioned; local radiation was administered to the selected areas and the other parts of the mice were protected by lead shielding.
Measurement of tumor volume and weight
The tumor growth was monitored by measuring the tumor diameters in two dimensions with a caliper each day. The tumor volumes were calculated using the following formula: Tumor volume (mm3) = (L × S2)/2, where L is the long diameter and S is the short diameter.
The mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation 24 h following the final treatment and the tumor samples were removed and weighed immediately.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining
The BALB/c mice were sacrificed and the xenografts were removed and fixed with 10% buffered formalin for 16 h, and embedded in paraffin blocks according to a conventional tissue processing procedure (21). The IHC staining was performed on 5-μm-thick sections of the paraffin and tissue microarray blocks. The sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated and then subjected to antigen retrieval, which was performed according to several recommended methods (22). The endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked using 0.3% hydrogen peroxide and the primary antibodies, anti-p-AKT, -MAPLC3-II, -PI3KIII, -Beclin1, -Bcl-2, -Bax, -DRAM and anti-p21, were applied and the samples were further incubated for 90 min at room temperature. The biotinylated homologous secondary antibodies were then applied and the samples were incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Following the reaction with the HRP-labeled streptavidin, diaminobenzene was added for color development followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin. The number of positive cells was counted in five microscopic fields from each tissue slide using ImagePro Plus 5.1 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA).
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl-transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay
Briefly, the sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated and digested with Proteinase K (Shanghai qcbio Science & Technologies Co., Ltd.) and then labeled with TUNEL reaction mixture (biotin-labeled POD; GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) for 60 min at 37°C. Next, the sections were screened for positive nuclei under a light microscope (Olympus CX21; Olympus Corporation). Data from all fields were pooled to obtain the apoptotic index and are presented as the percentage of TUNEL positive cells in the overall cell population, manually counted in 10 randomly selected fields.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± standard error and were analyzed by Student’s t-test, one-way analysis of variance or the χ2 test using SPSS version 17.10 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Cisplatin increases the cell-killing effects induced by radiation of tumor cells
The A549 cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate when 70–80% confluence was reached and treated with various doses of cisplatin for 48 h. The viability of the cells was then analyzed by MTT assay and cisplatin exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxicity in the A549 cells (P<0.05; Fig. 1A). A colony formation assay was performed to analyze the responses of the A549 cells to radiation with or without 5 μM cisplatin. As shown in Fig. 1B, cisplatin enhanced the radiation-induced cytotoxicity in A549 cells compared with that of the cells treated with IR alone. The colony formation assays and IHC staining identified a similar trend between the cells treated with fractionated IR with and without cisplatin (Fig. 1C and D). These observations indicated that cisplatin potently suppresses A549 tumor cell growth and synergizes with radiation to promote the cell-killing effect of radiation.
Combination of cisplatin with radiation enhances the cell-killing effects in vivo
To verify the effects of cisplatin and radiation on tumor growth in vivo, Lewis cells were injected into mice to establish the xenograft model. When the xenografts had grown to the same size, the mice were randomly grouped and treated as previously described. In comparison with the control group, the mice in the groups administered with different treatments, in particular the CRT plus cisplatin treatment group, exhibited tumors of smaller size (Fig. 2). These results provide additional evidence that the combination of cisplatin with IR leads to improved radiotherapy outcome.
Cisplatin enhances radiation-induced autophagy
Next, the underlying mechanism of the synergistic effect of cisplatin and radiation was investigated. Autophagy has been shown to exhibit a paradoxical function during cancer radiotherapy under certain circumstances; to confer radioresistance (23,24) or enhance radiation-induced cytotoxicity (25). As shown in Fig. 3, exposure of A549 cells to fractionated IR resulted in a significant elevation of autophagy rates as indicated by MDC staining. In addition, cisplatin was found to promote IR-induced autophagy. During the process of autophagy, the cytoplasmic MAPLC3-I protein (ATG-8 homolog) is converted to a lapidated form, MAPLC3-II, which tightly binds to the autophagosome membrane. In addition, Beclin1 was upregulated in A549 cells following exposure to fractionated IR.
Cisplatin enhances IR-induced apoptosis
Apoptosis has been acknowledged to be the predominant killing mechanism following radiation treatment. In the present study, fractionated IR upregulated apoptosis significantly in the A549 cells and cisplatin was found to markedly promote fractionated IR-induced apoptosis (Fig. 4A and B). To elucidate the underlying mechanism of this process, the levels of cleaved caspase-3 in the irradiated cells were evaluated at 48 h in the fractionated IR and fractionated IR plus cisplatin groups (Fig. 4C). The results demonstrated that the caspase-3 protein procession is involved in fractionated IR-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, the production of the active cleaved fragment of caspase-3 following fractionated IR treatment supported the involvement of this protease in apoptosis. Caspase-3 processing was enhanced further following the combination of cisplatin with radiation, when compared with radiation alone.
Fractionated IR was also found to result in a marked increase of p21 expression in the A549 cells, which was further enhanced with the cisplatin and radiation combination treatment. These observations suggested that cisplatin promotes the radiation-induced apoptosis via the activation of caspase-3 protein procession and p21 expression.
Combined effect of cisplatin and IR on the autophagy regulatory genes
Following the confirmation of the association between combination therapy and autophagy, the effect of radiation alone and radiation plus cisplatin on the diverse genes crucial in the autophagy signaling pathways were investigated. As shown in Fig. 5A and C, IHC analysis demonstrated that the combination of cisplatin with fractionated IR results in a significant elevation of PI3KIII and Beclin1 expression levels (P<0.05) when compared with exposure to fractionated IR alone (P<0.05). Class I PI3Ks activate AKT/PKB via phosphorylation, which in turn inhibits autophagy (26,27). In the current study, the level of p-AKT was found to decline following exposure to fractionated IR in the presence or absence of cisplatin. The DRAM1 gene has also been reported to promote the autophagy process (28). In the present study, DRAM1 was markedly upregulated following the exposure of the A549 cells to the combined treatment when compared with radiation alone. In addition, the MAPLC3-II protein (which indicates autophagosome formation) was significantly upregulated following exposure to radiation with or without cisplatin (P<0.05) compared with the Sham-irradiated group. These observations indicated that cisplatin acts synergistically with radiation to trigger autophagic signaling pathways.
Impact of combination therapy on apoptosis-related genes
Bcl-2 and Bax are crucial components of the apoptotic machinery. As shown in Fig. 5B and C using TUNEL assay and IHC analysis, the combined cisplatin and fractionated IR therapy resulted in a significant decrease of Bcl-2 expression levels (P<0.05) when compared with fractionated IR alone (P<0.05). By contrast, Bax expression was significantly elevated following the different treatments. In addition, p21 expression was markedly upregulated following combined therapy. These results indicated that the combination of cisplatin with radiation affects the apoptosis signaling genes more potently than radiation alone.
Discussion
Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are effective treatments for lung cancer, which induce tumor cell death via a variety of signaling pathways. Numerous efforts have been made to confirm that apoptosis induces cell death with regularity (10). However, the involvement of autophagy (type II programmed cell death) has not yet been fully clarified in this process.
In contrast to apoptosis, autophagy is paradoxical as it may induce autophagic cell death or provide a survival vehicle for the tumor against nutrition- and energy-deficient environments as a result of chemotherapy, endocrine drugs and irradiation, among others. Cisplatin, a commonly used chemotherapy agent, is generally considered to be a radiosensitizer as it inhibits the repair of sublethal damage from irradiation (29). The aim of the present study was to investigate the mechanism exerted by cisplatin and irradiation on non-small cell lung cancer cells in vitro and tumor xenografts in vivo, as well as to offer promising evidence for clinical practice.
Firstly, the current study revealed that cisplatin enhances the killing effect of irradiation in A549 cells and a xenograft model. Furthermore, although cisplatin was not found to act as a radiosensitizer, it did exhibit a synergistic effect.
Next, the underlying mechanisms of the synergistic effects of cisplatin and radiation were investigated and the autophagic and apoptotic changes were detected following the different A549 cell treatments. MDC staining and western blotting revealed an increase in autophagosome number, as well as increased MAPLC3 and Beclin1 expression when cisplatin was combined with radiation. Previous studies of autophagy in the human lung cancer cell lines, H460 and A549, provide strong and direct evidence that autophagic vacuoles may be induced by ionizing irradiation and that the autophagic death of tumor cells may be enhanced by an autophagy inducer alone or in combination with ionizing irradiation in vitro (13,30,31), which are consistent with the results of the present study. Additionally, data have implied that the inhibition of autophagy potentiates chemosensitivity to cisplatin (32).
Apoptosis is known to be the predominant cell-killing mechanism induced by radiation (33). The results of the present study revealed that cisplatin promotes radiation-induced apoptosis via the activation of the caspase-3 protein procession and p21 expression. Although p21 induces growth arrest and inhibits apoptosis and thereby protects cells in certain systems, studies have also suggested that p21 possesses proapoptotic functions under specific conditions in other systems (34). In thymocytes, the upregulation of p21 leads to hypersensitivity to cell death in response to IR and ultraviolet radiation, but not to dexamethasone in transgenic animals (35).
Following the confirmation in the present study of the association between combination therapy and autophagy/apoptosis, the impact of radiation alone and radiation plus cisplatin on the diverse genes that are considered to have crucial roles in autophagy signaling pathways was investigated in the xenografts. The results showed that the MAPLC3-II/MAPLC3-I conversion ratio and Beclin1 expression levels were increased following the combination of cisplatin with radiation. In addition, it was revealed that the combination of cisplatin with fractionated IR resulted in a significant elevation of the autophagy signaling genes, PI3KIII and Beclin1, as well as declined p-AKT levels and upregulated DRAM1 gene expression. These results demonstrated that cisplatin combined with radiation enhances autophagic cell death. The PI3Ks (classes I and III) are a family of enzymes that are involved in autophagic signaling. Class III PI3Ks have been shown to stimulate autophagy and Beclin1 (also known as Atg6 or BECN1) is an integral protein in the class III PI3K pathway and triggers autophagy. Beclin1 binds to class III PI3Ks and aids in the regulation of the autophagosome formation. Furthermore, studies have shown that following irradiation, the PI3KI/AKT signal pathway has a close association with the repair of DNA damage. The cell stress caused by IR, such as DNA base deletion and glucose molecule damage, may be repaired by DNA polymerase β which may be overexpressed in the PI3KI/AKT signal pathway. Thus, the inhibition of the PI3KI/AKT signaling pathway as a result of the addition of cisplatin improves the cell-killing efficacy of irradiation (36).
In the present study, the combination of cisplatin with fractionated IR was found to effect the apoptosis-related genes, resulting in a significant decrease in Bcl-2 expression and increase in p21 and Bax expression. Bcl-2 is known to negatively regulate the Beclin1-induced autophagy cell death (37) and, therefore, the inhibition of Bcl-2 was considered to potently enhance autophagy. However, Bax expression was significantly elevated following treatment with fractionated IR, but was not elevated with combined therapy. Conversely, p21 expression was markedly upregulated following combined therapy. These results indicated that the combination of cisplatin with radiation affects the apoptosis signaling genes more potently than radiation alone.
In conclusion, the current study offers strong evidence that the combination of cisplatin with radiation strengthens the cell-killing effect of radiation via proapoptotic and proautophagic cell death.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 30770649, 30970682 and 31370837), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (grant no. 20100061110070), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University and the Fundamental Research Funds for Jilin University.
References
Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 62:10–29. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
National Cancer Institute. SEER cancer statistics review. 1975–2010, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010/. Accessed August 20, 2012 | |
Ettinger DS, Akerley W, Borghaei H, Chang AC, et al; National comprehensive cancer network. Non-small cell lung cancer, version 2.2013. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 645–653. 2013. | |
Jin Z and El-Deiry WS: Overview of cell death signaling pathways. Cancer Biol Ther. 4:139–163. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
Schmitt CA, Fridman JS, Yang M, et al: A senescence program controlled by p53 and p16INK4a contributes to the outcome of cancer therapy. Cell. 109:335–346. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chu K, Teele N, Dewey MW, Albright N and Dewey WC: Computerized video time lapse study of cell cycle delay and arrest, mitotic catastrophe, apoptosis and clonogenic survival in irradiated 14-3-3sigma and CDKN1A (p21) knockout cell lines. Radiat Res. 162:270–286. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kim KW, Hwang M, Moretti L, Jaboin JJ, Cha YI and Lu B: Autophagy upregulation by inhibitors of caspase-3 and mTOR enhances radiotherapy in a mouse model of lung cancer. Autophagy. 4:659–668. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim R, Emi M, Tanabe K, Uchida Y and Arihiro K: The role of apoptotic or nonapoptotic cell death in determining cellular response to anticancer treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 32:269–277. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mathew R, Karp CM, Beaudoin B, et al: Autophagy suppresses tumorigenesis through elimination of p62. Cell. 137:1062–1075. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhu K, Dunner K Jr and McConkey DJ: Proteasome inhibitors activate autophagy as a cytoprotective response in human prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. 29:451–462. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Abedin MJ, Wang D, McDonnell MA, Lehmann U and Kelekar A: Autophagy delays apoptotic death in breast cancer cells following DNA damage. Cell Death Differ. 14:500–510. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boya P, González-Polo RA, Casares N, et al: Inhibition of macroautophagy triggers apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 25:1025–1040. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sotelo J, Briceño E and López-González MA: Adding chloroquine to conventional treatment for glioblastoma multiforme: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 144:337–343. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kanzawa T, Germano IM, Komata T, Ito H, Kondo Y and Kondo S: Role of autophagy in temozolomide-induced cytotoxicity for malignant glioma cells. Cell Death Differ. 11:448–457. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Paglin S, Hollister T, Delohery T, et al: A novel response of cancer cells to radiation involves autophagy and formation of acidic vesicles. Cancer Res. 61:439–444. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Qadir MA, Kwok B, Dragowska WH, et al: Macroautophagy inhibition sensitizes tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells and enhances mitochondrial depolarization. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 112:389–403. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Carew JS, Nawrocki ST, Kahue CN, et al: Targeting autophagy augments the anticancer activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA to overcome Bcr-Abl-mediated drug resistance. Blood. 110:313–322. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Amaravadi RK, Yu D, Lum JJ, et al: Autophagy inhibition enhances therapy-induced apoptosis in a Myc-induced model of lymphoma. J Clin Invest. 117:326–336. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Apel A, Herr I, Schwarz H, Rodemann HP and Mayer A: Blocked autophagy sensitizes resistant carcinoma cells to radiation therapy. Cancer Res. 68:1485–1494. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Katayama M, Kawaguchi T, Berger MS and Pieper RO: DNA damaging agent-induced autophagy produces a cytoprotective adenosine triphosphate surge in malignant glioma cells. Cell Death Differ. 14:548–558. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Schneider JP and Ochs M: Alterations of mouse lung tissue dimensions during processing for morphometry: A comparison of methods. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 306:L341–L350. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hofman FM and Taylor CR: Immunohistochemistry. Curr Protoc Immunol. 103:21–24. 2012. | |
Han MW, Lee JC, Choi JY, et al: Autophagy inhibition can overcome radioresistance in breast cancer cells through suppression of TAK1 activation. Anticancer Res. 34:1449–1455. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Cheng H, Li J, Liu C, et al: Profilin1 sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to irradiation by inducing apoptosis and reducing autophagy. Curr Mol Med. 13:1368–1375. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Altmeyer A, Josset E, Denis JM, et al: The mTOR inhibitor RAD001 augments radiation-induced growth inhibition in a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line by increasing autophagy. Int J Oncol. 41:1381–1386. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Alessi DR, James SR, Downes CP, et al: Characterization of a 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase which phosphorylates and activates protein kinase Balpha. Curr Bio. 7:261–269. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stokoe D, Stephens LR, Copeland T, et al: Dual role of phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate in the activation of protein kinase B. Science. 277:567–570. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mah LY, O’Prey J, Baudot AD, et al: DRAM-1 encodes multiple isoforms that regulate autophagy. Autophagy. 8:18–28. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Altundag O, Altundag K, Morandi P and Hanrahan E: Cisplatin as a radiosensitizer in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 41:4352005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang ZH, Peng ZL, Duan ZL and Liu H: Expression and clinical significance of autophagy gene Beclin 1 in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 37:860–863. 2006.(In Chinese). | |
Miracco C, Cosci E, Oliveri G, et al: Protein and mRNA expression of autophagy gene Beclin 1 in human brain tumours. Int J Oncol. 30:429–436. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kang R, Wang ZH, Wang BQ, et al: Inhibition of autophagy-potentiated chemosensitivity to cisplatin in laryngeal cancer Hep-2 cells. Am J Otolaryngol. 33:678–684. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ning S and Knox SJ: G2/M-phase arrest and death by apoptosis of HL60 cells irradiated with exponentially decreasing low-dose-rate gamma radiation. Radiat Res. 151:659–669. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ghanem L and Steinman R: A proapoptotic function of p21 in differentiating granulocytes. Leuk Res. 29:1315–1323. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fotedar R, Brickner H, Saadatmandi N, et al: Effect of p21waf1/cip1 transgene on radiation induced apoptosis in T cells. Oncogene. 18:3652–3658. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cataldi A, Zauli G, Di Pietro R, et al: Involvement of the pathway phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/AKT-1 in the establishment of the survival response to ionizing radiation. Cell Signal. 13:369–375. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pattingre S and Levine B: Bcl-2 inhibition of autophagy: a new route to cancer? Cancer Res. 66:2885–2888. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |