Salinomycin induces selective cytotoxicity to MCF-7 mammosphere cells through targeting the Hedgehog signaling pathway

  • Authors:
    • Ying-Zi Fu
    • Yuan-Yuan Yan
    • Miao He
    • Qing-Huan Xiao
    • Wei-Fan Yao
    • Lin Zhao
    • Hui-Zhe Wu
    • Zhao-Jin Yu
    • Ming-Yi Zhou
    • Mu-Tian Lv
    • Shan-Shan Zhang
    • Jian-Jun Chen
    • Min-Jie Wei
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 17, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4434
  • Pages: 912-922
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) are believed to be responsible for tumor chemoresistance, recurrence, and metastasis formation. Salinomycin (SAL), a carboxylic polyether ionophore, has been reported to act as a selective breast CSC inhibitor. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying SAL-induced cytotoxicity on BCSCs remain unclear. The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway plays an important role in CSC maintenance and carcinogenesis. Here, we investigated whether SAL induces cytotoxicity on BCSCs through targeting Hh pathway. In the present study, we cultured breast cancer MCF-7 cells in suspension in serum-free medium to obtain breast CSC-enriched MCF-7 mammospheres (MCF-7 MS). MCF-7 MS cells possessed typical BCSC properties, such as CD44+CD24-/low phenotype, high expression of OCT4 (a stem cell marker), increased colony-forming ability, strong migration and invasion capabilities, differentiation potential, and strong tumorigenicity in xenografted mice. SAL exhibited selective cytotoxicity to MCF-7 MS cells relative to MCF-7 cells. The Hh pathway was highly activated in BCSC-enriched MCF-7 MS cells and SAL inhibited Hh signaling activation by downregulating the expression of critical components of the Hh pathway such as PTCH, SMO, Gli1, and Gli2, and subsequently repressing the expression of their essential downstream targets including C-myc, Bcl-2, and Snail (but not cyclin D1). Conversely, Shh-induced Hh signaling activation could largely reverse SAL-mediated inhibitory effects. These findings suggest that SAL-induced selective cytotoxicity against MCF-7 MS cells is associated with the inhibition of Hh signaling activation and the expression of downstream targets and the Hh pathway is an important player and a possible drug target in the pathogenesis of BCSCs.

Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant cancers worldwide, and is the leading cause of cancer-related death in women (1). Despite great advances in the treatment of breast cancer in recent years, the development of drug resistance and relapse is a major hurdle in the treatment of breast cancer (2). Recent studies have shown that cancer stem cells (CSCs), a rare subpopulation of cells with tumorigenic potential, are resistant to chemotherapy, thereby allowing tumor regrowth (35). Therefore, targeting chemotherapy-resistant breast CSCs will be essential to prevent breast cancer resistance and relapse.

The Hedgehog (Hh), Notch, and Wnt signaling pathways are crucial to cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation during embryonic development, and play an important role in CSC maintenance and carcinogenesis (68). Recently, the Hh signaling pathway has attracted extensive attention in the CSC research. Aberrant activation of the Hh pathway has been found in many tumors, such as gastric carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, esophageal carcinoma, and small-cell lung cancer (912). In addition, it has been reported that Hh signaling activation is required for human glioma growth and survival as well as CSC self-renewal and tumorigenicity (13). Tanaka et al reported that the Hh signaling pathway played an essential role in maintaining the highly tumorigenic populations of breast cancer cells, including the side population and the CD44+CD24−/low subpopulation (14). Therefore, targeting Hh signaling pathway represents a novel and promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of breast cancer. Currently, Hh pathway inhibitors are undergoing preclinical and clinical studies as anticancer agents (15).

Salinomycin (SAL), a carboxylic polyether ionophore, has recently been identified as a highly effective inhibitor of breast CSCs by high-throughput screening (16). Subsequently, SAL has been shown to selectively kill CSCs in many other cancers including colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and endometrial cancer (1721). Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying selective toxicity of SAL for CSCs remain poorly understood. It has been reported that SAL inhibits cancer cell growth and migration by promoting oxidative stress, and inducing apoptosis and autophagy (2226). In addition, Lu et al reported that SAL inhibited the Wnt signaling pathway and selectively induced cell apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells (27). SAL has been reported to selectively inhibit osteosarcoma stem cells and downregulate Wnt signaling (28). However, it remains unclear whether the Hh signaling pathway is involved in SAL-induced toxicity for breast CSCs.

In the present study, we cultured breast cancer MCF-7 cells in suspension in serum-free medium to obtain BCSC-enriched MCF-7 mammospheres (MCF-7 MS), and examined the effect of SAL on proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion of MCF-7 MS cells. More importantly, we investigated the role/involvement of the Hh signaling pathway in SAL-induced selective cytotoxicity against MCF-7 MS cells. Our study showed that the Hh signaling pathway was highly activated in BCSC-enriched MCF-7 MS. The inhibition of the Hh signaling pathway mediated by SAL was critical for SAL-induced selective cytotoxicity to breast CSCs.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and mammosphere generation

The human breast cancer MCF-7 cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Invitrogen, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. Mammospheres were cultured as previously reported by Ponti et al (29). Briefly, MCF-7 cells (5×104/ml) were cultured in suspension in serum-free DMEM-F12 (Gibco, USA), supplemented with 2% B27 (Invitrogen) and 20 ng/ml EGF and 10 ng/ml bFGF (both from Peprotech, USA). Cells were grown in these conditions as non-adherent spherical clusters of cells, the MCF-7 mammospheres (MCF-7 MS). MCF-7 MS cells were enzymatically dissociated every 5–6 days with 0.25% trypsin and subcultured in DMEM-F12 with growth factors as described above.

Flow cytometric analysis

Flow cytometry was performed to determine the expression of CD44 and CD24 in MCF-7 and MCF-7 MS cells, apoptosis, and cell cycle change in the SAL-treated MCF-7 MS cells. For analysis of CD44 and CD24 expression, cells were suspended at a density of 1×106 cells/ml in 100 µl PBS and incubated with fluorescence isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated antibodies against CD44 (1:20) and phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated antibodies against CD24 (1:10) (both from BD Pharmingen, USA) for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. The cells were washed in PBS and centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 min. Single-cell suspensions were analyzed by flow cytometry using FACSCalibur (Becton-Dickinson).

MCF-7 MS cells were treated with 30 and 60 nM SAL for 48 h. DMSO was used as a negative control. Cells were the harvested by centrifugation, and washed twice with cold PBS. For apoptosis analysis, cells were resuspended in 250 µl Annexin V binding buffer at a density of 1×106 cells/ml. The suspension (100 µl) was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 min with a solution of Annexin V-FITC (2.5 µg/ml) and PI (5 µg/ml). Cells were analyzed for apoptosis by flow cytometer. For cell cycle analysis, cells were fixed with 70% ethanol and stored at 4°C overnight. Cells were then rehydrated with PBS for 10 min, and stained with propidium iodide (PI, 50 µg/ml) for 15 min at 37°C in PBS containing 2 µg/ml RNase A and 0.2% NP-40. Cell cycle analysis was performed by flow cytometry.

Soft agar colony formation assay

MCF-7 and MCF-7 MS cells (103 cells/ml) were suspended in 0.6% agar with culture medium (1:1), and layered on preformed 1.2% agar with culture medium (1:1) base layer. Culture medium was added on the top agar layer every 3–4 days. After incubation for 3 weeks at 37°C, the colonies/well was counted from 8 different random fields under an inverted microscope (Nikon TE2000-U; Nikon Japan).

Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8/WST-8) assay

Cell viability was measured by a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo, Japan). MCF-7 or MCF-7 MS cells (8,000 cells/well) were seeded into 96-well ultra-low adherent plates (Corning, Lowell, MA, USA), and allowed to grow in the growth medium for 24 h. To determine the IC50 value of SAL, cells were treated with various concentrations of SAL (10, 30, 100, 300, 1,000, 3,000 and 10,000 nM; Sigma, USA) for 48 h. To investigate the effect of Shh on SAL-induced inhibition on MCF-7 MS proliferation, MCF-7 MS cells were treated with SAL (60 nM), Shh (3 µg/ml; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), SAL (60 nM) + Shh (3 µg/ml), or vehicle control (DMSO) for 48 h. Cells in each well were then incubated with WST-8 (2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) for 4 h. Plates were read at 450 nm wavelength in an Anthos 2010 microplate reader (Anthos Labtec Instruments GmbH, Austria).

Transwell migration and invasion assays

Transwell migration and invasion assays were conducted as described by Fan et al (30). Briefly, the upper chambers were plated with 4×104 MCF-7 cells in 0.5 ml serum-free DMEM medium or 4×104 MCF-7 MS cells in 0.5 ml serum-free DMEM/F12 medium. The lower chambers were filled with 0.5 ml cell culture medium containing 10% FBS. To test the effect of SAL on migration and invasion of MCF-7 MS cells, MCF-7 MS cells were pretreated with 30 and 60 nM SAL, or vehicle control (DMSO) for 48 h. Cells were allowed to migrate toward the lower chamber for 24 h at 37°C. The number of cells migrating through the membrane was counted under a light microscope (×200 magnification, five random fields per well), and were analyzed using ImageJ software.

Total and nuclear proteins extraction and western blot analysis

Cells were harvested and total proteins were extracted was carried out as previously described (31), and nuclear proteins were extracted according to the manufacturer's protocol from nuclear protein extraction kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes by electroblotting. Membranes were blocked with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20, and then incubated with primary antibodies against OCT4 (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology), Gli1 (1:500), Gli2 (1:800), PTCH (1:1,000) and SMO (1:1,000) (all from Abcam), C-myc (1:1,000) and Bcl-2 (1:1,000) (both from Cell Signaling Technology), cyclin D1 (1:1,000; Beyotime Biotechnology), Snail (1:300; Abcam), GAPDH (1:6,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and histone H3 (1:1,000; Beyotime Biotechnology) overnight at 4°C. Membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (dilution 1:5,000; Abcam) at room temperature for 1 h. Bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham, Freiburg, Germany). The results were quantitatively analyzed using Scion Image software (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MA, USA).

Mammosphere formation assay

Single-cell suspensions of MCF-7 MS cells were thoroughly suspended and plated in 6-well ultra-low adherent plates (Corning) at 1×105 cells/well in 4 ml of sphere formation medium. After 24 h, cells were treated with SAL, Shh, or DMSO as a control for 48 h. Cells were then collected, digested into single cells and plated in 6-well ultra-low adherent plates with 2,000 cells/well in mammosphere formation medium (2 ml). Fresh medium (1 ml) was added into the plates every 3–4 days. After culture for 8 days, the number of the mammospheres/2,000 cells was counted for the primary mammosphere formation assay under an inverted microscope (Nikon TE2000-U; Nikon). The above mammospheres in each group were collected, digested into single cells and plated in 6-well ultra-low adherent plates with 2,000 cells/well in mammosphere formation medium (2 ml) for the secondary mammosphere formation assay.

Immunofluorescence

MCF-7 MS cells were treated with 30 and 60 nM SAL, or DMSO as a control for 48 h. After the treatment, cells were collected and rinsed in PBS before incubation in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections (4 µm) were cut and subjected to immunofluorescence staining. Cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 10 min, rinse in PBS, and blocked with normal goat serum for 1 h at room temperature. The sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against PTCH (1:20), SMO (1:100), Gli1 (1:100) and Gli2 (1:100) (all from Abcam). After primary antibody was removed by washing in PBS, immunoreactivity was detected by incubation with FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:300; Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained using DAPI for 15 min. Fluorescence was detected using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Japan).

In vivo xenograft experiments

For the study of the tumorigenic ability of MCF-7 and MCF-7 MS cells, equal numbers of MCF-7 cells or MCF-7 MS cells (2×103, 2×104, 2×105 and 2×106 cells) were suspended in PBS and Matrigel (1:1; BD Biosciences), and subcutaneously inoculated into the flank of female BALB/c athymic nude mice (n=6 mice per group). The presence or absence of a visible or palpable tumor was evaluated 6 weeks after the initial injection of the cells. Mice (n=5 mice per group) inoculated with 2×106 MCF-7 or MCF-7 MS cells were sacrificed 6 weeks after the initial injection of the cells, and tumors were weighed and harvested for subsequent western blot analysis. All mice were bred in pathogen-free conditions at the Animal Center of China Medical University. All animal studies were carried out in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistics 16.0 software package. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student's t-test was used to compare differences between two groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare differences among more than two groups. Statistical significance was considered at P<0.05.

Results

MCF-7 MS cells possess breast CSC-like properties

MCF-7 cells cultured in suspension in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with growth factors formed tight sphere-like mammospheres after 7–8 passages (Fig. 1A). It has been shown that breast CSCs have a CD44+CD24 phenotype (32), so that we examined the presence of CD44 and CD24 in MCF-7 MS cells using flow cytometry. We found that the proportion of CD44+CD24 cells in MCF-7 MS cells was as high as 81.4±11.7%, >30-fold greater than that (2.53±1.28%) in the parental MCF-7 cells (Fig. 1B), indicating that MCF-7 MS cells expressed breast CSC-specific markers.

We next assessed the expression of the stem cell marker OCT4 in MCF-7 MS cells. Western blot analysis showed that the expression of OCT4 was significantly higher in MCF-7 MS cells compared with MCF-7 cells (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, we measured the colony-forming ability of MCF-7 MS cells, using soft agar colony formation assay. The MCF-7 MS cells formed significantly more colonies than MCF-7 cells (Fig. 1D). These data suggested that MCF-7 MS cells exhibited breast CSC-like self-renewal capacity.

We further investigated the migration and invasion capacity of MCF-7 MS cells, using Transwell migration and invasion assays. The number of MCF-7 MS cells that migrated and invaded into the lower Transwell chamber was significantly greater than that of MCF-7 cells (Fig. 1E), suggesting that MCF-7 MS cells exhibited increased migration and invasion.

We also examined the re-differentiation potential of the MCF-7 MS cells by culturing MCF-7 MS in DMEM culture medium with 10% FBS. After culture for 42 h, some spherical MCF-7 MS cells began to grow adherently, and exhibited differentiation properties. After culture for 100 h, MCF-7 MS cells completely lost the spheroid characteristics, grew adherently, and exhibited morphology similar to MCF-7 cells (Fig. 1F). The finding that MCF-7 MS cells could re-differentiate into MCF-7 cells under serum-rich conditions suggested that MCF-7 MS cells have the CSC-like differentiation potential.

To further investigate the in vivo tumorigenic ability of MCF-7 MS, we subcutaneously inoculated MCF-7 MS cells or MCF-7 cells into the flank of nude mice. MCF-7 MS cells formed tumors in mice administered 2×103 cells, whereas 2×105 parental MCF-7 cells were required to generate tumors (Fig. 2A). With a given number of xenografted cells, MCF-7 MS cells generated tumors at a higher frequency in mouse xenografts than MCF-7 cells (Fig. 2A). Six weeks after inoculation of 2×106 cells, the average weight of MCF-7 MS cell-induced tumors (0.98±0.25 g) was significantly higher than that of MCF-7 cell-induced tumors (0.66±0.11 g) (Fig. 2B). The expression of OCT4 was also significantly higher in tumors transplanted with MCF-7 MS cells than in those transplanted with MCF-7 cells. These results showed that MCF-7 MS cells had stronger tumorigenicity.

Taken together, our data showed that MCF-7 MS cells obtained from serum-free suspension culture possessed breast CSC-like properties such as self-renewal, differentiation potential, strong migration and invasion capacities, and high tumorigenicity.

Salinomycin inhibits proliferation, induces apoptosis, and reduces migration and invasion of MCF-7 MS cells

It is known that SAL can selectively kill BCSCs (16). To investigate whether SAL selectively killed CSC-like MCF-7 MS cells obtained from serum-free suspension culture, we tested the sensitivity of MCF-7 and MCF-7 MS cells to SAL. Cells were treated with various concentrations of SAL (10–10,000 nM) for 48 h, and cell viability was examined using CCK-8 assay. The survival rates of both cells decreased in a dose-dependent manner. The IC50 value for SAL in MCF-7 MS cells was 99 nM, which was ~82-fold lower than that in MCF-7 MS cells (8,113 nM) (Fig. 3A), suggesting that SAL selectively killed MCF-7 MS cells. Furthermore, we examined the effect of SAL on mammosphere formation of MCF-7 MS cells. SAL (30 and 60 nM) significantly inhibited the primary and secondary mammosphere formation (Fig. 3B), further suggesting that SAL inhibited proliferation of MCF-7 MS cells.

We next examined the effect of SAL on the apoptosis of MCF-7 MS cells, using flow cytometry. SAL (30 and 60 nM) treatment for 48 h significantly increased the percentage of early apoptotic MCF-7 MS cells compared with the vehicle control (Fig. 3C). SAL treatment increased apoptosis of MCF-7 MS cells in a dose-dependent manner. However, compared with vehicle controls, SAL (30 and 60 nM) treatment for 48 h did not result in a significant change in the proportions of MCF-7 MS cells in G1, S, and G2 phases of the cell cycle (Fig. 3D).

We then investigated the effects of SAL on migration and invasion of MCF-7 MS cells using Transwell migration and invasion assays. Compared with vehicle controls, SAL (30 and 60 nM) treatment for 48 h resulted in a significantly lower number of MCF-7 MS cells that migrated into the lower chambers (Fig. 3E). SAL-induced inhibition of cell migration and invasion was dose-dependent.

The Hh signaling pathway is highly activated in MCF-7 MS cells and its activation can be effectively inhibited by salinomycin

The Hh signaling pathway regulates cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation during normal development, and plays an important role in CSC maintenance and carcinogenesis (6,8). Thus, we presumed that the Hh signaling pathway may be involved in SAL-induced cytotoxicity toward MCF-7 MS cells. We examined the protein expression of the main components of the Hh signaling pathway in MCF-7 and MCF-7 MS cells, including the Patched (PTCH) receptor, Smoothened (SMO), Gli1, and Gli2. Western blot analysis showed that the expression levels of PTCH, SMO, Gli1, and Gli2 were significantly higher in MCF-7 MS cells than in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 4A), suggesting that the Hh signaling pathway was highly activated in MCF-7 MS cells. As expected, SAL (30 and 60 nM) effectively inhibited the expression of PTCH, SMO, Gli1, and Gli2 in MCF-7 MS cells dose-dependenly (Fig. 4B). Consistently with western blot results, immunofluorescence results showed that the expression of PTCH, SMO, Gli1, and Gli2 was substantially decreased in MCF-7 MS cells after the treatment of SAL (Fig. 4C). In addition, we examined the nuclear expression of Gli1, which more reliably reflects Hh signaling activation. The nuclear expression of Gli1 was significantly inhibited by SAL treatment (Fig. 4D).

Oncogene C-myc, anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-2, cell cycle regulator cyclin D1, and transcription factor Snail are important downstream target genes of the Hh/Gli signaling pathway (3336). To further demonstrate SAL-induced inhibition on Hh signaling activation, we investigated the effect of SAL on the protein expression of C-myc, Bcl-2, cyclin D1, and Snail. Western blot analysis showed that SAL (30 and 60 nM) significantly reduced the expression of C-myc, Bcl-2, and Snail, but not cyclin D1 (Fig. 5). The inhibitory effect of SAL on the expression of C-myc, Bcl-2, and Snail was dose-dependent. These findings suggested that salinomycin could effectively inhibit the activation of Hh signaling pathway in MCF-7 MS cells.

Shh-mediated Hh signaling activation largely reverses SAL-induced cytotoxicity toward MCF-7 MS cells

To determine whether SAL-induced inhibition of the Hh signaling pathway is required for its selective cytotoxicity against MCF-7 MS cells, we conducted a series of rescue assays. Shh is a ligand that can activate the Hh signaling pathway (37), and therefore we used it for the rescue assays. As shown in Fig. 6A, Shh (3 µg/ml) significantly increased the expression of PTCH, SMO, Gli1, and Gli2, indicating that Shh could activate the Hh signaling pathway in MCF-7 MS cells. As expected, Shh treatment could largely reverse SAL-induced inhibition on the expression of PTCH, SMO, Gli1, Gli2 (Fig. 6A) and downstream target genes, C-myc, Bcl-2, and Snail (Fig. 6B) in MCF-7 MS cells, suggesting that Shh prevented SAL-induced inhibition on Hh signaling activation.

We then investigated the effect of Shh on SAL-induced cytotoxicity in MCF-7 MS cells. Shh (3 µg/ml) significantly promoted cell viability of MCF-7 MS cells compared with the vehicle control (Fig. 6C). Moreover, Shh treatment could largely reverse SAL-induced decrease in cell viability of MCF-7 MS cells (Fig. 6C). In addition, we found that Shh (3 µg/ml) significantly promoted mammosphere formation and Shh treatment could largely reverse SAL-induced inhibition on mammosphere formation (Fig. 6D). These results suggest that the Hh signaling pathway is critical for SAL-induced selective cytotoxicity against BCSC-enriched MCF-7 MS cells.

Discussion

Recent studies proposed that CSCs are responsible for tumor chemoresistance, recurrence, and metastasis (3,5,38). A subpopulation of breast cancer with the expression of the surface marker CD44+CD24−/low has been shown to display stem cell-like properties with tumorigenic potential (32). However, CSCs are rare, making them very difficult to isolate and study. Ponti et al have reported that CD44+CD24−/low cells with stem cell-like properties are enriched in mammospheres obtained from culturing of breast cancer samples and breast cancer MCF-7 cells in suspension in serum-free medium (29). In the present study, we applied a similar procedure for culturing MCF-7 cells and obtained CD44+CD24−/low cell-enriched mammospheres. In addition, MCF-7 MS cells are featured with high expression of the stem cell marker OCT4, increased colony-forming ability, strong migration and invasion capabilities, re-differentiation potential, and strong tumorigenicity in vivo. These properties are typical characteristics of breast CSCs (29,39,40).

Salinomycin (SAL) has been identified as a selective inhibitor of breast CSCs (16), and its selective inhibition on CSCs has also been observed in other cancers including colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (1721). Here we showed that SAL exerted selective cytotoxicity to MCF-7 MS cells with an IC50 value of 99 nM, which was ~82-fold lower compared with parental MCF-7 cells, suggesting that SAL selectively killed MCF-7 MS cells. In addition, Dong et al found that SAL selectively targeted CD133+ cell subpopulations and reduced cell migration in colorectal cancer cells (17). In the present study, we found that SAL reduced migration and invasion of MCF-7 MS cells. These studies suggest that SAL may prevent cancer metastasis. Additionally, SAL selectively induces cell apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells (27). Similarly, we found that SAL induced apoptosis in MCF-7 MS cells.

The mechanisms underlying SAL-induced cytotoxicity to CSCs remain unclear. Lu et al reported that SAL inhibited the Wnt signaling pathway in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells (27). In addition, SAL has been found to inhibit CSCs in osteosarcoma and endometrial cancer and downregulate Wnt signaling (21,28). It is well known that similar to the Wnt signaling pathway, the Hh signaling pathway plays an important role in maintaining self-renewal of stem cells (37,41). The Hh signaling pathway is activated by binding of ligands to the PTCH receptor and subsequently alleviating inhibition of SMO, thus regulating the expression of Gli transcription factors (3336). It has been reported that the expression of PTCH, SMO, Gli1 and Gli2 are upregulated in breast CSCs (37). In the present study, we found that the expression of PTCH, SMO, Gli1, and Gli2 was significantly higher in MCF-7 MS cells, T47D MS cells and MCF-7 MS xenograft tumors, suggesting that the Hh signaling pathway is activated in breast CSCs. In addition, we found that SAL inhibited Hh signaling activation, and Hh signaling activation reduced SAL-induced cytotoxicity in MCF-7 MS cells, suggesting that the Hh signaling pathway is involved in SAL-induced cytotoxicity to breast CSCs. Tanaka et al reported that inhibition of the Hh signaling pathway decreased proliferation of CD44+CD24−/low breast cancer cells (14), suggesting that the Hh signaling pathway plays an important role in maintaining proliferation of breast CSCs. In agreement with their findings, we found that SAL inhibited Hh signaling activation, and decreased CD44+CD24−/low cell-enriched mammosphere formation, suggesting that SAL reduces proliferation of breast CSCs via inhibition of the Hh signaling pathway. Recently, Lu et al reported that salinomycin exerted anticancer effects on MCF-7 cells via modulation of Hedgehog signaling (42). However, their study focused on the anticancer effects of salinomycin on MCF-7 cells, not breast cancer stem cells. While in the present study we demonstrated that salinomycin selectively induced cytotoxicity to BCSC-enriched MCF-7 mammosphere cells through targeting the Hedgehog signaling pathway.

Hh/Gli signaling activation results in an increase in the expression of many downstream target genes including C-myc, Bcl-2, cyclin D1, and Snail, which regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle, migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (3336). It has been reported that C-myc is required for proliferation and self-renewal of normal stem cell and CSCs (43,44). Our findings that SAL significantly inhibited cell proliferation and reduced the expression of C-myc in MCF-7 MS cells suggest that SAL may inhibit breast CSC proliferation via the downregulation of C-myc. In addition, we also found that SAL induced cell apoptosis and downregulated the expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins in MCF-7 MS cells, suggesting that SAL may induce breast CSC apoptosis via the downregulation of Bcl-2. Consistently with our findings, Fu et al found that inhibition of Bcl-2 expression promoted pancreatic CSC apoptosis (45). Furthermore, we found that SAL inhibited cell migration and invasion in MCF-7 MS cells and reduced the expression of Snail, a transcription factor that regulates EMT (46,47). It has been reported that blockade of Hh signaling downregulates the expression of Snail, and inhibits pancreatic cancer invasion and metastases (48). Therefore, SAL may inhibit breast CSC migration and invasion by inhibiting the expression of Snail. Taken together, these results suggests that SAL may produce cytotoxicity to MCF-7 MS cells via repressing the Hh/Gli signaling pathway by inhibiting C-myc expression to reduce cell proliferation, inhibiting Bcl-2 expression to promote cell apoptosis, and inhibiting Snail expression to reduce cell migration and invasion.

Cell cycle regulator cyclin D1 is one of the downstream target genes of the Hh signaling pathway (35). However, in the present study, although SAL inhibited Hh signaling activation in MCF-7 MS cells, SAL did not alter the expression of cell cycle regulator cyclin D1, and did not cause cell cycle arrest measured by flow cytometry. Similarly, SAL-induced apoptosis is not accompanied by cell cycle arrest in human Molt-4 leukemia cells (49). In contrast, it has been reported that SAL downregulates the expression of cyclin D1 in ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer cells, and induces apoptosis via cell cycle arrest at G1 in ovarian cancer cells (50). The effect of SAL on cell cycle regulation seems to be cell-context dependent.

In summary, we found that SAL exerted cytotoxicity to MCF-7 MS cells by inhibiting proliferation, inducing apoptosis, and reducing migration and invasion, but not affecting the cell cycle. SAL-induced cytotoxicity was associated with inhibition of Hh signaling activation and the expression of downstream target genes including C-myc, Bcl-2 and Snail, but not cyclin D1. Therefore, our studies not only revealed a novel molecular mechanism underlying SAL-induced selective cytotoxicity to BCSCs, but also suggest that the Hh signaling pathway likely plays an important role in the maintenance of CSC properties of breast cancer cells, and this pathway is a possible drug target for the treatment of breast cancer.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81373427 and 31300693), Program for Liaoning Innovative Research Team in University (grant no. LT2014016), Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University (grant no. LJQ2014084), the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (grant no. 2014021085) and the S&T Projects in Shenyang, China (grant no. F14-232-6-05).

References

1 

DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P and Jemal A: Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:409–418. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Marquette C and Nabell L: Chemotherapy-resistant metastatic breast cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 13:263–275. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Zhou J, Zhang H, Gu P, Bai J, Margolick JB and Zhang Y: NF-kappaB pathway inhibitors preferentially inhibit breast cancer stem-like cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 111:419–427. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Diehn M, Cho RW, Lobo NA, Kalisky T, Dorie MJ, Kulp AN, Qian D, Lam JS, Ailles LE, Wong M, et al: Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells. Nature. 458:780–783. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Sampieri K and Fodde R: Cancer stem cells and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 22:187–193. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Varjosalo M and Taipale J: Hedgehog: Functions and mechanisms. Genes Dev. 22:2454–2472. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Dontu G, Jackson KW, McNicholas E, Kawamura MJ, Abdallah WM and Wicha MS: Role of Notch signaling in cell-fate determination of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Breast Cancer Res. 6:R605–R615. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Taipale J and Beachy PA: The Hedgehog and Wnt signalling pathways in cancer. Nature. 411:349–354. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Watkins DN, Berman DM, Burkholder SG, Wang B, Beachy PA and Baylin SB: Hedgehog signalling within airway epithelial progenitors and in small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 422:313–317. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Ma X, Sheng T, Zhang Y, Zhang X, He J, Huang S, Chen K, Sultz J, Adegboyega PA, Zhang H, et al: Hedgehog signaling is activated in subsets of esophageal cancers. Int J Cancer. 118:139–148. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Fukaya M, Isohata N, Ohta H, Aoyagi K, Ochiya T, Saeki N, Yanagihara K, Nakanishi Y, Taniguchi H, Sakamoto H, et al: Hedgehog signal activation in gastric pit cell and in diffuse-type gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 131:14–29. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Kayed H, Kleeff J, Keleg S, Guo J, Ketterer K, Berberat PO, Giese N, Esposito I, Giese T, Büchler MW, et al: Indian hedgehog signaling pathway: Expression and regulation in pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer. 110:668–676. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Clement V, Sanchez P, de Tribolet N, Radovanovic I and Ruiz i Altaba A: HEDGEHOG-GLI1 signaling regulates human glioma growth, cancer stem cell self-renewal, and tumorigenicity. Curr Biol. 17:165–172. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Tanaka H, Nakamura M, Kameda C, Kubo M, Sato N, Kuroki S, Tanaka M and Katano M: The Hedgehog signaling pathway plays an essential role in maintaining the CD44+CD24−/low subpopulation and the side population of breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 29:2147–2157. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Sheikh A, Alvi AA, Aslam HM and Haseeb A: Hedgehog pathway inhibitors - current status and future prospects. Infect Agent Cancer. 7:292012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Gupta PB, Onder TT, Jiang G, Tao K, Kuperwasser C, Weinberg RA and Lander ES: Identification of selective inhibitors of cancer stem cells by high-throughput screening. Cell. 138:645–659. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Dong TT, Zhou HM, Wang LL, Feng B, Lv B and Zheng MH: Salinomycin selectively targets 'CD133+' cell subpopulations and decreases malignant traits in colorectal cancer lines. Ann Surg Oncol. 18:1797–1804. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Zhi QM, Chen XH, Ji J, Zhang JN, Li JF, Cai Q, Liu BY, Gu QL, Zhu ZG and Yu YY: Salinomycin can effectively kill ALDH(high) stem-like cells on gastric cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 65:509–515. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Zhang GN, Liang Y, Zhou LJ, Chen SP, Chen G, Zhang TP, Kang T and Zhao YP: Combination of salinomycin and gemci-tabine eliminates pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 313:137–144. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Kuo SZ, Blair KJ, Rahimy E, Kiang A, Abhold E, Fan JB, Wang-Rodriguez J, Altuna X and Ongkeko WM: Salinomycin induces cell death and differentiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma stem cells despite activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and Akt. BMC Cancer. 12:5562012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Kusunoki S, Kato K, Tabu K, Inagaki T, Okabe H, Kaneda H, Suga S, Terao Y, Taga T and Takeda S: The inhibitory effect of salinomycin on the proliferation, migration and invasion of human endometrial cancer stem-like cells. Gynecol Oncol. 129:598–605. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Ketola K, Hilvo M, Hyötyläinen T, Vuoristo A, Ruskeepää AL, Orešič M, Kallioniemi O and Iljin K: Salinomycin inhibits prostate cancer growth and migration via induction of oxidative stress. Br J Cancer. 106:99–106. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Kim KY, Yu SN, Lee SY, Chun SS, Choi YL, Park YM, Song CS, Chatterjee B and Ahn SC: Salinomycin-induced apoptosis of human prostate cancer cells due to accumulated reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 413:80–86. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Lieke T, Ramackers W, Bergmann S, Klempnauer J, Winkler M and Klose J: Impact of salinomycin on human cholangiocarcinoma: Induction of apoptosis and impairment of tumor cell proliferation in vitro. BMC Cancer. 12:4662012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Wang F, He L, Dai WQ, Xu YP, Wu D, Lin CL, Wu SM, Cheng P, Zhang Y, Shen M, et al: Salinomycin inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 7:e506382012. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Verdoodt B, Vogt M, Schmitz I, Liffers ST, Tannapfel A and Mirmohammadsadegh A: Salinomycin induces autophagy in colon and breast cancer cells with concomitant generation of reactive oxygen species. PLoS One. 7:e441322012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Lu D, Choi MY, Yu J, Castro JE, Kipps TJ and Carson DA: Salinomycin inhibits Wnt signaling and selectively induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:13253–13257. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Tang QL, Zhao ZQ, Li JC, Liang Y, Yin JQ, Zou CY, Xie XB, Zeng YX, Shen JN, Kang T, et al: Salinomycin inhibits osteo-sarcoma by targeting its tumor stem cells. Cancer Lett. 311:113–121. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Ponti D, Costa A, Zaffaroni N, Pratesi G, Petrangolini G, Coradini D, Pilotti S, Pierotti MA and Daidone MG: Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties. Cancer Res. 65:5506–5511. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Fan X, Chen X, Deng W, Zhong G, Cai Q and Lin T: Up-regulated microRNA-143 in cancer stem cells differentiation promotes prostate cancer cells metastasis by modulating FNDC3B expression. BMC Cancer. 13:612013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

He M, Sun HG, Hao JY, Li YL, Yu JK, Yan YY, Zhao L, Li N, Wang Y, Bai XF, et al: RNA interference-mediated FANCF silencing sensitizes OVCAR3 ovarian cancer cells to adriamycin through increased adriamycin-induced apoptosis dependent on JNK activation. Oncol Rep. 29:1721–1729. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ and Clarke MF: Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:3983–3988. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Hatton BA, Knoepfler PS, Kenney AM, Rowitch DH, de Alborán IM, Olson JM and Eisenman RN: N-myc is an essential downstream effector of Shh signaling during both normal and neoplastic cerebellar growth. Cancer Res. 66:8655–8661. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Bigelow RL, Chari NS, Unden AB, Spurgers KB, Lee S, Roop DR, Toftgard R and McDonnell TJ: Transcriptional regulation of bcl-2 mediated by the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway through gli-1. J Biol Chem. 279:1197–1205. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Duman-Scheel M, Weng L, Xin S and Du W: Hedgehog regulates cell growth and proliferation by inducing cyclin D and cyclin E. Nature. 417:299–304. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Li X, Deng W, Nail CD, Bailey SK, Kraus MH, Ruppert JM and Lobo-Ruppert SM: Snail induction is an early response to Gli1 that determines the efficiency of epithelial transformation. Oncogene. 25:609–621. 2006.

37 

Liu S, Dontu G, Mantle ID, Patel S, Ahn NS, Jackson KW, Suri P and Wicha MS: Hedgehog signaling and Bmi-1 regulate self-renewal of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells. Cancer Res. 66:6063–6071. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Liu H, Patel MR, Prescher JA, Patsialou A, Qian D, Lin J, Wen S, Chang YF, Bachmann MH, Shimono Y, et al: Cancer stem cells from human breast tumors are involved in spontaneous metastases in orthotopic mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:18115–18120. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Cariati M, Naderi A, Brown JP, Smalley MJ, Pinder SE, Caldas C and Purushotham AD: Alpha-6 integrin is necessary for the tumourigenicity of a stem cell-like subpopulation within the MCF7 breast cancer cell line. Int J Cancer. 122:298–304. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Zhao XQ, Dai CL, Ohnuma S, Liang YJ, Deng W, Chen JJ, Zeng MS, Ambudkar SV, Chen ZS and Fu LW: Tandutinib (MLN518/CT53518) targeted to stem-like cells by inhibiting the function of ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2. Eur J Pharm Sci. 49:441–450. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Takashima S, Mkrtchyan M, Younossi-Hartenstein A, Merriam JR and Hartenstein V: The behaviour of Drosophila adult hindgut stem cells is controlled by Wnt and Hh signalling. Nature. 454:651–655. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Lu Y, Ma W, Mao J, Yu X, Hou Z, Fan S, Song B, Wang H, Li J, Kang L, et al: Salinomycin exerts anticancer effects on human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cancer stem cells via modulation of Hedgehog signaling. Chem Biol Interact. 228:100–107. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Wang J, Wang H, Li Z, Wu Q, Lathia JD, McLendon RE, Hjelmeland AB and Rich JN: c-Myc is required for maintenance of glioma cancer stem cells. PLoS One. 3:e37692008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Murphy MJ, Wilson A and Trumpp A: More than just proliferation: Myc function in stem cells. Trends Cell Biol. 15:128–137. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Fu J, Rodova M, Roy SK, Sharma J, Singh KP, Srivastava RK and Shankar S: GANT-61 inhibits pancreatic cancer stem cell growth in vitro and in NOD/SCID/IL2R gamma null mice xenograft. Cancer Lett. 330:22–32. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Kalluri R and Weinberg RA: The basics of epithelial-mesen-chymal transition. J Clin Invest. 119:1420–1428. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Haslehurst AM, Koti M, Dharsee M, Nuin P, Evans K, Geraci J, Childs T, Chen J, Li J, Weberpals J, et al: EMT transcription factors snail and slug directly contribute to cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 12:912012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Feldmann G, Dhara S, Fendrich V, Bedja D, Beaty R, Mullendore M, Karikari C, Alvarez H, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Jimeno A, et al: Blockade of hedgehog signaling inhibits pancreatic cancer invasion and metastases: A new paradigm for combination therapy in solid cancers. Cancer Res. 67:2187–2196. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Fuchs D, Heinold A, Opelz G, Daniel V and Naujokat C: Sali-nomycin induces apoptosis and overcomes apoptosis resistance in human cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 390:743–749. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Koo KH, Kim H, Bae YK, Kim K, Park BK, Lee CH and Kim YN: Salinomycin induces cell death via inactivation of Stat3 and downregulation of Skp2. Cell Death Dis. 4:e6932013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2016
Volume 35 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Fu Y, Yan Y, He M, Xiao Q, Yao W, Zhao L, Wu H, Yu Z, Zhou M, Lv M, Lv M, et al: Salinomycin induces selective cytotoxicity to MCF-7 mammosphere cells through targeting the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Oncol Rep 35: 912-922, 2016.
APA
Fu, Y., Yan, Y., He, M., Xiao, Q., Yao, W., Zhao, L. ... Wei, M. (2016). Salinomycin induces selective cytotoxicity to MCF-7 mammosphere cells through targeting the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Oncology Reports, 35, 912-922. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4434
MLA
Fu, Y., Yan, Y., He, M., Xiao, Q., Yao, W., Zhao, L., Wu, H., Yu, Z., Zhou, M., Lv, M., Zhang, S., Chen, J., Wei, M."Salinomycin induces selective cytotoxicity to MCF-7 mammosphere cells through targeting the Hedgehog signaling pathway". Oncology Reports 35.2 (2016): 912-922.
Chicago
Fu, Y., Yan, Y., He, M., Xiao, Q., Yao, W., Zhao, L., Wu, H., Yu, Z., Zhou, M., Lv, M., Zhang, S., Chen, J., Wei, M."Salinomycin induces selective cytotoxicity to MCF-7 mammosphere cells through targeting the Hedgehog signaling pathway". Oncology Reports 35, no. 2 (2016): 912-922. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4434