An efficient and simple co-culture method for isolating primary human hepatic cells: Potential application for tumor microenvironment research

  • Authors:
    • Wei Dong
    • Aiguo Lu
    • Jingkun Zhao
    • Shuai Yin
    • Baochi Ou
    • Hao Feng
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 28, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.4979
  • Pages: 2126-2134
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Co-cultivation of non-parenchymal cells (NPCs) and tumor cells from the same donor is important for metastatic cancer research. This study aimed to optimize a protocol for liver NPC isolation. Two novel 3D organotypic co‑culture models for hepatocyte, endothelial cell (EC) and Kupffer cell (KC) isolation were used. Long‑term cell co‑culture, density gradient centrifugation and magnetic‑activated cell sorting (MACS) were established. ECs were isolated from the co‑culture system; the purity of the ECs was 92±1.2%. The island‑like shape of hepatocytes was noted in the 3D co‑culture system, and spindle cells were found in the rest space. Immunofluorescence analysis showed a net structure; the connective tissue was positively stained with VE‑cadherin or CD68, which were ECs and KCs/macrophages. KCs were enriched in this system and separated by using selective adherence to plastic. Clec4f+ KCs consisted of 87±6.3% of these cells. Heterogeneous endothelium populations were detected, including sinusoid ECs, microvascular ECs and hepatic lymphatic vessel epithelial cells. In addition, hepatic progenitor cells were isolated and differentiated into hepatoblasts. Dendritic cells (DCs), invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells were further separated by density gradient centrifugation and magnetic bead sorting. In the present study, high protein expression levels of desmin and GFAP were observed in the hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Most of the HSCs were α‑SMA‑positive cells, which underlined the identity of activated HSCs. Intrahepatic human biliary epithelial cells (hBECs) were semi‑purified by centrifugation on a Percoll gradient and were further immunopurified. In conclusion, we provide an efficient long‑term culture method to obtain liver NPCs in sufficient number and purity.

Introduction

An extensive body of clinical data and experimental research has confirmed Stephen Paget's original 'seed and soil' hypothesis that proposed that the organ-preference patterns of tumor metastasis are the product of favorable interactions between metastatic tumor cells (the 'seed') and their organ microenvironment (the 'soil') (1,2). The liver is the second most common site of metastasis (spread of cancer), after the lymph nodes. Liver metastases have been found in 30–70% of patients who are dying of cancer (3). Breast cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, melanoma and pancreatic cancer all might spread to the liver, especially colorectal cancer. Unfortunately, only 20% of patients with colorectal liver metastases present liver-confined resectable disease and/or are candidates for major surgical operation (depending on comorbidities) (4,5). Importantly, 5-year survival rates are reported to be in the range of 40–58% (6). Based on the above analysis, it is important to investigate the liver environment and establish co-culture models for cancer research. Discovery of an efficient isolating method is definitely the first step, not only for hepatocytes but also for non-parenchymal cells (NPCs) such as liver sinusoid endothelial cells (LSECs), hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and liver resident immune cells, including Kupffer cells (KCs), invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells as well as dendritic cells (DCs). However, successful and consistent isolation of primary human hepatic cells remains a challenge for both cell-based therapeutics and laboratory research (7). Herein, a relatively synchronous (7–14 days for each cell type) and efficient method for isolating primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) and liver NPCs from surgical specimens is described.

Materials and methods

Tissue specimens

Liver wedges were obtained from non-diseased tissue removed at surgical resection for liver tumor, liver metastasis from colorectal carcinoma or fresh transplanted specimens (n=21; weight, 20–83 g). The surgical procedures were carried out at the University Hospital of Munich and Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. All patients provided written documentation of informed consent. The human liver pieces used in this study were acquired with consent for governance through the Human Tissue and Cell Research Foundation (http://www.htcr.de/english/home.html), a state-controlled non-profit foundation (ref. no. Antrags-Nr. 2014-01). After a pathologist removed what was required for diagnosis, liver pieces were collected from the remaining tissue. The tissue sectioned off by the pathologist was morphologically a healthy tissue obtained from resection margins after liver resection. The study conforms to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Human Tissue and Cell Research Foundation and the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Munich and Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.

Isolation of PHHs and NPCs

Liver cells were prepared according to a modified 'two-stage' perfusion technique described by Seglen (8) and isolated as previously described (9). Following 'two-stage' collagenase (batch no. NB 4G, cat. no. 17465; SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH, Germany) procedure and manual dissociation of the liver wedge, the suspension was passed through a sterile nylon mesh of 210 µm (neoLab 4–1413) followed by a sterile nylon mesh of 70 µm (neoLab 4–1419) (both from neoLab Migge GmbH, Germany). Suspensions were then washed once at 50 × g for 5 min at 4°C in cold storage solution (CSS; Hepacult GmbH, Germany). The pellet was washed two more times for hepatocyte enrichment. The NPC-containing cell suspension, as the supernatant obtained after the first wash, was further used to isolate KCs, LSECs, HSCs, DCs and iNKT cells. The procedure is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1. In detail, the supernatant was collected in 200 ml polypropylene centrifuge tubes (cat. no. 352075; BD Biosciences) and pelleted by 600 rpm centrifugation (Eppendorf 5810R; Eppendorf) for 5 min at 4°C.

The pellet was then resuspended and seeded in 12-well ultra-low attachment plates (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) at a density of 1.5–2×107 viable cells/cm2 by using Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/Ham's F-12 (Gibco Life Technologies, Germany). This pellet contained the remaining hepatocytes and KCs; the mixture was co-cultured for 2–3 weeks with 10 µg/ml HGF (red arrow, Fig. 1). The cells were collected at 14–21 days from each well and washed three times, and then the cells were transferred into 100-mm non-tissue culture grade plastic dishes. Incubation was carried out for 30 min at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and ~95% air. Macrophages readily attached to the non-tissue culture grade plastic dishes under this incubation process, whereas other types of cells did not. Two milliliters of trypsin solution was added into the dish and incubated for 10 min at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and ~95% air. Then 10 ml of the growth medium were added and the cells were gently scraped. The collected KCs were then centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 min, and propagated in 75-cm2 flasks (red dashed line in Fig. 1).

The supernatant washed with CSS was collected in a 50-ml polystyrene conical Falcon tube (BD Biosciences) and pelleted at 1,500 rpm for 7 min at 4°C. After three times washing, the pellet was seeded in collagen I-coated empty tissue culture 75-cm2 flasks or 6-well Corning BioCoat Collagen I Multiwell Plates (both from Corning, Inc.) with DMEM/F-12 and EGF, 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine for hepatic microvascular endothelial cell (EC) isolation (purple arrow, Fig. 1). The assessment of yield and viability was made by using a hemocytometer-based trypan blue exclusion assay. DMEM/F-12 plus 0.1 ng/ml recombined human EGF and 90 µg/ml heparin (10 ng/ml insulin-like growth factor was also optimal) were used from day 4 which lasted for ~7–8 days. On day 7, the hepatocytes were detached by trypsin (PAA) for 4–5 min and the procedure was observed by microscopy. Hepatocytes were then washed out, and the rest were microvascular epithelial cells (Fig. 2).

Or the pellet was processed as mentioned in step 1. The supernatant was placed in 50-ml Falcon tubes after washing once with RPMI-1640 medium by centrifugation at 800 × g for 5 min. The cells were then resuspended in 8 ml 30% Percoll™ PLUS/Percoll (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Freiburg, Germany), placed in 15-ml polystyrene conical centrifuge tube (BD Biosciences) and overlaid with 3 ml 70% Percoll solution. After being centrifuged at 2,500 rpm for 20 min at room temperature with decreased acceleration and without breaks, the various cell types were arranged according to their density. HSCs were enriched in an upper cell layer, whereas macrophages/KCs, oval cells and LSEC fractions were floating between 50 and 60% Percoll. DCs, monocytes and lymphocytes were enriched in the interphase of 60 and 70% Percoll. Mature intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells were floating on the 70% Percoll. Cell fractions were collected separately by pipetting (10).

For the immune cell enrichment, the monocyte fraction was pelleted, resuspended in 1 ml of 10X RBC lysis buffer and transfered to a new tube. The cell suspension was allowed to stay for 3 min at room temperature to lyse RBCs, and was then diluted with 9 ml RPMI-1640 medium, centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 min at 4°C and the cells were washed twice with 10 ml of RPMI-1640 medium. The live cell number was counted and adjusted to a cell concentration of 1×106 cells/ml and placed in 75-cm2 flasks after being washed three times. A total of 100 ng/ml α-galactosylceramide (α-Galcer; Abcam, UK) was added 8 h after seeding. The medium containing α-Galcer was changed every 2–3 days. DCs were induced and enriched in the first 48 h, being replaced by monocyte-induced macrophages after 72 h. On day 7–10, the supernatant was collected and washed three times. After being adjusted to a cell concentration of 1×106 cells/ml by adding FACS staining buffer, the cells were labeled with iNKT (clone 6B–11) microbeads (human TCR Vα24-Jα18 combined with Vβ11; Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were applied onto LS magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) columns (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH) twice, which were placed within the magnetic field of a MACS separator and washed three times with MACS buffer (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH). Vα24-Jα18 combined with Vβ11-positive iNKT cells were eluted from the columns, and the viable iNKT cells were counted and propagated in flasks.

DCs were enriched on day 2 or 3 as attached cells. However, other monocytes were in the suspension. These cell suspensions were collected and were propagated in another flask. The remaining cells were detached by trypsin (PAA) and were incubated with human IgG (1 µg/106 ml; BioLegend, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) to block non-specific binding to Fcγ receptors for 15 min. The cells were then labeled with CD1c microbeads. CD1c+ DCs were propagated in culture plates (blue arrow, Fig. 1) after magnetic sorting.

Cell suspension as mentioned in step 4 was collected and propagated in another flask as step 4. The former flasks which contained the attached cells were refilled with 20 ml completed growth medium. M2-differentiated macrophages were enriched on day 4–7, iNKT cells was also separated here (orange arrow, red arrow, Fig. 1). Alternatively, culture plates coated by the attached cells from the last step were cultivated with DMEM containing IL-4 and GM-CSF for 5 days, and M2-differentiated macrophages were harvested.

The macrophage/KC fraction was pelleted and KCs were also labeled with APC-conjugated anti-Clec4f antibody (LS-C233943, LifeSpan Biosciences, Inc., USA) for 45 min at 10 µl/100 µl after a 15-min incubation of human IgG blocking, followed by 10 µl/100 µl anti-APC-microbead incubation (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH) and magnetic cell sorting according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were resuspended in growth medium and seeded at a sufficient density of 1–2×106 cells/cm2.

For the stem cell enrichment, the fraction between 50 and 60% Percoll was pelleted and seeded in a 75-cm2 collagen I-coated flask after being washed three times and cultivated in a plastic dish for 30 min to eliminate KCs. Serum-free iPSC medium plus EGF was placed for the cell culture. ECs were proliferated from day 3. Hepatic progenitor cell-like cells differentiated to hepatocytes surrounding the EC niches from day 5.

For the intrahepatic biliary epithelial cell isolation and purification, the fraction floating on 70% Percoll was seeded in 75-cm2 collagen I-coated empty tissue culture flasks (Corning, Inc.). Cells were grown in medium containing DMEM/F-12 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (Cellgro; Mediatech, Inc. Manassas, VA, USA), penicillin/streptomycin, vitamin solution, MEM solution, CD lipid concentrate, L-glutamine, insulin/transferrin/selenium-A, bovine pituitary extract, epidermal growth factor, 3,3′,5-triiodo-L-thyronine and dexamethasone.

Identification of cell populations

Morphological characteristics were determined by phase contrast images acquired with an Olympus IX50 microscope (Olympus, Germany). Cells cultured in 8-well chamber slides (Falcon; BD Biosciences, Germany) and culture inserts (Ibidi GmbH, Martinsried, Germany) were washed twice with cold Tris-buffered saline (TBS), pH 7.4, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min (for the staining of extracellular markers, permeabilization was not necessary), blocked with 5% BSA, incubated with the indicated primary antibodies: rabbit anti-human Clec4f (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), mouse anti-human CD68 (Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit anti-human epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., UK), anti-GFAP and anti-desmin (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-α-SMA (Abcam), anti-OV-6 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Paso Robles, CA, USA), cytokeratin-19 (CK-19; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), rabbit anti-human VE-cadherin (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and APC-iNKT (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH) at 4°C overnight followed by anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 and anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies, Germany). The cells were then stained with anti-fade DAPI (Life Technologies) for nuclear staining, and the images were acquired with an Olympus Axion microscope (Olympus, Japan).

3D cell culture

Two 3D cell culture models were used in this study, ultra-low attachment plates (Sigma-Aldrich) and HDP1096 Perfecta3D® 96-Well Hanging Drop Plates (3D Biomatrix, Inc.). For the hanging drop plates, the pellet collected from step 1 was washed three times and a 100 cell/µl cell suspension was prepared. Hanging drops were formed by pipetting 45 µl of cell suspension into each well from the top side of the plate. Hanging drops were formed on and confined to the bottom of the plate. The lid was placed on the plate and the assembly was placed into a tissue culture incubator. Within hours, individual cells started to aggregate and eventually formed into spheroids. Media exchange followed the protocol supplied by 3D Biomatrix, Inc. DMEM/F-12 with HGF, 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine was used for culture maintenance.

Statistical analysis

All continuous values are expressed as means ± SD and all experiments were repeated three times. Immunofluorescence staining of cell type-specific markers was performed in five independent experiments. For quantitative analysis, DAPI-stained, marker-positive and -negative cells were counted in 10 independent images per cell type at ×20 magnification. The results were subjected to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. A paired Student's t-test was also used to analyze the intragroup differences. All statistical analyses were conducted using StatView 5.0 for Windows (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Student's t-test was also used to test differences in cell viability assays. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Hepatic (microvascular) EC isolation, primary culture and subculture based on the co-culture system

The supernatant from the first washing was centrifuged, the pellet was resuspended and plated in collagen I-coated flasks and processed as detailed in 'Materials and methods'. Fig. 2A and B show representative images of PHHs and microvascular ECs, in culture on days 4 and 5 after isolation. The hepatocytes formed an island-like shape with an irregular outline. In the rest space proliferated ECs were noted until day 7–9 (Fig. 2B). Fig. 2C and D shows the morphological features of the hepatocyte and EC co-culture system 6 and 7 days after isolation. The ECs exhibited cobblestone morphologic characteristics, which resembled the shape of microvascular epithelial cells (11). The cultured ECs were harvested as early as day 8, by detachment of hepatocytes. After a 4–5-min trypsin treatment, the hepatocytes were soon detached, however ECs were still attached (Fig. 2E). The number of ECs reached maximal levels on day 12–14, when the cells formed a flat cell sheet and tight conjunction on the plate surface (Fig. 2F). When the colonies of ECs reached 80% confluency, the cells were detached by trypsin for 8–10 min and subcultured in new collagen I-coated tissue culture flasks. The purity of the ECs was 92±1.2% as characterized by VE-cadherin and EpCAM.

KC isolation and purification based on the 3D co-culture system

Similar to what was observed in the 2D co-culture system for EC isolation, the island-like shape of hepatocytes was also observed in the 12- or 96-well 3D co-culture system (Fig. 3A). Spindle cells were found in the rest space (Fig. 3B). Primary KCs, prepared from the 3D co-culture system and plastic dish attachment as described in step 1, formed typical irregular morphology of both a stretched and an oval shape (12). Immunofluorescence staining was performed using the same methods as below. The medium in each well was carefully removed and gently refilled with embedding medium for cryosectioning (Leica, Germany), followed by freezing of the plates. The 3D co-culture model then underwent the immunofluorescence analysis. A net structure was found, and the connecting tissue was positively stained with VE-cadherin, CD68 or Clec4f (Fig. 3C–E), which were ECs and KCs/macrophages. Clec4f+ KCs were less than the CD68+ macrophages in the 3D organotypic co-culture models after whole-mount staining by two-photon microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany). In addition, the cells collected from the other wells were collected, centrifuged and washed three times. After that, KCs were enriched using the isolation method above (step 1). A total of 87±6.3% of these cells was Clec4f-positive (Fig. 6G and M), which were KCs rather than peripheral derived macrophages (13).

LSEC isolation and heterogeneous endothelium populations

The morphology of LSECs was different from the microvascular ECs (14,15) (Fig. 4A and C), although both were VE-cadherin+ EpCAM+ (Fig. 4B and D), especially when observed in the co-culture system of ECs and LSECs (Fig. 4E). In addition, the LSECs tended to form hepatic EC niche when co-cultivated with hepatocytes or NPCs (Fig. 4F). However, it was difficult to tell the differences between the hepatic microvascular ECs and ECs from the hepatic lymphatic vessels (Fig. 6K) according to the morphology. Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1) unequivocally distinguishes lymphatic from blood microvascular endothelium (16), as assessed by immunostaining with the anti-LYVE-1 antibody.

Hanging drop models for 3D hepatocyte culture

Spheroid formation time was 48–72 h and lasted for 9–12 days. Sponges were observed from day 10–12, which were formed by ECs and hepatocytes. VE-cadherin+ ECs not only were detected in the sponges but also in the spheroid. According to the color variations and immunofluorescence, the spheroid was formed by three layers. Blood cells were the major source of the core, hepatocytes formed the second layer and maintained the capability of regeneration. However, ECs and other NPCs constituted the cover of the spheroid (Fig. 5).

Characterization of other NPCs

The complete yield of the HSCs, separated from the NPC suspension by density gradient centrifugation, was seeded into a 75-cm2 tissue culture flask using stellate cell growth medium (cat. no. 5301; ScienCell Research Laboratories, Inc.). Once 90% confluency was reached, the cells were detached by trypsin and seeded into plastic dishes using DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine. Freshly isolated HSCs exhibited the phenotypically star-shaped morphology and were transformed into an activated state, as identified by a myofibroblast-like phenotype within 10 days of cell culture. In the present study, HSCs were stained for α-SMA, desmin and GFAP, well-known markers of HSCs to distinguish HSCs from myofibroblasts as described elsewhere (17). Imaging revealed high protein expression of desmin and GFAP in the HSCs. Most of the HSCs were α-SMA-positive cells, which confirmed the identity of the activated HSCs. Intrahepatic human biliary epithelial cells (hBECs) were semi-purified by centrifugation on a Percoll gradient and were further immunopurified. hBECs were cytokeratin-7 (CK-7+), CK-19+ (18,19) and α-SMA cells.

Hepatic progenitor cells were driven to differentiate into hepatoblasts

The oval cells were collected as described above. Cells were cultured using iPSC cell growth medium (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH) with 10 ng/ml HGF. On day 0, the oval cells (hepatic progenitor cells) displayed small oval morphology with a dark nucleus and few cytoplasma. Immunostaining revealed that most of the cells were positive for the definitive markers CK-19 and OV-6 (Fig. 7F) and the hepatic progenitor cell marker EpCAM (data not shown) (2022). On day 2 the oval cells started to display typical LSEC morphology, and LSECs were enriched on day 3–4. The number of LSECs reached maximal levels on day 4–6. Five to six days of iPSC cell growth medium and HGF-induction treatment resulted in the appearance of hepatocyte-like cells, which are reported to be hepatoblasts (Fig. 7A) (23). Fig. 7B–E shows the enrichment of the hepatoblasts on day 7–9.

Discussion

In order to improve the research platform for cancer research, especially for in vitro liver metastatic model establishment, functional and reproducible human liver cell co-culture models as well as high quality and quantity hepatocytes and non-parenchymal hepatic cells are essential. Recently, Pfeiffer et al isolated human hepatocytes and NPCs from tissue obtained by partial liver resection by a two-step EDTA/collagenase perfusion technique. The obtained cell fractions were purified by Percoll density gradient centrifugation. KCs, LSECs and HSCs were further separated using selective adherence to plastic. LSECs were separated by MACS using CD31 microBeads (24). Most recently, Werner et al established a three layer iodixanol density gradient using 9 and 12.6% iodixanol to separate NPCs. The advantage of the method of Werner et al is that LSECs and KCs can be separated as one fraction from the HSC population. These two methods were reported and approved to be available for high quality and quantity (25). In order to increase the purity, magnetic beads specific for CD31 or CD146 were used to label LSECs. Both methods provide cell yields comparable to those obtained by single and multiple cell type isolation methods.

In the present study, we established an efficient and co-culture isolation method based on 3D cell co-culture, long-term cell co-culture, density gradient centrifugation and MACS. The presented method provided high purities and comparable cell yields to the methods above.

Most recently, Lavin et al identified 12,743 macrophage-specific enhancers and established that tissue-resident macrophages have distinct enhancer landscapes beyond what can be explained by developmental origin. Clec4f was reported to be the biomarker of liver-resident macrophages, as known KCs, which would be a specific marker for KC characteristics (13). In the present study, we found less Clec4f+ KCs than CD68+ macrophages. However, in the co-culture model, 87±6.3% of the isolated macrophages were Clec4f-positive, which might also be differentiated tissue-resident macrophages that were reprogrammed by the 3D cultured liver microenvironment.

The liver has a dual blood supply. The hepatic artery and portal vein both drain into the hepatic sinusoids, which represent the capillary network in the liver. The endothelial lining of liver sinusoids demonstrates microheterogeneity between periportal and centrilobular regions (26). Nolan et al identified LSECs as VEGFR3+IsolectinGSIB4+CD34dim/−IgG cells (27). VE-cadherin+ ESC ECs (embryonic stem cell differentiation into ECs) were found to consist of ~60% of the vasculature in the regenerating liver in the same report. In line with this study, our study showed that both LSECs and microvascular ECs expressed VE-cadherin. To increase the purity of the LSECs, VEGFR3+IsolectinGSIB4 +CD34dim/− cell sorting would be recommended as an available strategy. Many groups used CD31 as a sorting strategy for LSECs (28,29), however, it was reported that purified ESC-ECs maintained 99.3% VE-cadherin and CD31 positivity for at least 4 weeks after purification (25).

With only <1% of the NPC population as hepatic DCs, isolating a sufficient amount of hepatic DCs is a timely and costly task. Several methods using cytokine stimulation have been developed to increase the total hepatic DC population in vitro and in vivo (30). Joyee et al provide direct evidence that iNKTs preferentially promote the functional development of DCs (31). Bollyky et al also found that iNKT cell activation with α-Galcer induced mature DCs (23). In this study, α-Galcer, as a specific ligand for human and mouse natural killer T (NKT) cells, was added into the culture system of monocytes. We supposed that iNKT cells could be selectively activated so that the DCs, mostly monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) would be induced. However, we only separated CD1c+ DCs in this study, which was the major subset of classic human DCs as well as inflammatory DCs (32). The subgroups of DCs need to be further analyzed by flow cytometry.

Concerning the biliary epithelial cells, their limited number (3% of the total liver mass) and their intrahepatic localization have limited the development of in vitro cell models in order to gain molecular insights into their function (33). In the present study, we isolated hBECs from chronic liver injury, most of which were liver metastasis, as it was reported that chronic cell injury such as chronic hepatitis elicited mobilization of hepatic endodermal stem cells or oval cells, which can give rise both to hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (34).

Reports have suggested that a 3D liver cell co-culture system is a promising approach to mimic the tissue architecture in vivo (35,36). Kostadinova et al (37) and Messner et al (35) reported the earliest investigation of 3D co-culture liver model. Messner et al showed that the accumulation of hepatocytes and NPCs in hanging drops resulted in microtissue formation within 3 days. Immunohistochemical staining showed hepatocytes, CD68+ KCs as well as CD31+ ECs. In addition, the functionality of liver microtissues was reported to be preserved for more than 5 weeks, as indicated by persistent albumin secretion. However, the PHHs in our hanging drop model did not attach after a 2-week cultivation (27). And the functionality of the PHHs was not as sufficient as reported. This might be because in our study, the cell number (>5,000 cells) and diameter of the spheroids were larger than these parameters in the previous studies. It is recommended to investigate the functionality of NPCs and PHHs on organotypic co-culture models.

In conclusion, we developed an efficient and 3D cell co-culture isolation method. Isolated KCs, sinusoid ECs, ECs, biliary epithelial cells, DCs, stellate cells, hepatic progenitor cell-like cells and iNKT cells can be further used as co-cultures for cancer research in particular tumor immunology and liver metastasis.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Wolfgang E. Thasler, and Hepacult GmbH for their assistance with the hepatocyte isolation. This study was supported, in part, by the China Scholarship Council (CSC) (201306230127) and the German Academic Exchange Service scholarship.

References

1 

Paget S: The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. 1889 Cancer Metastasis Rev. 8:98–101. 1989.

2 

Langley RR and Fidler IJ: Tumor cell-organ microenvironment interactions in the pathogenesis of cancer metastasis. Endocr Rev. 28:297–321. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Wanebo HJ, Chu QD, Avradopoulos KA and Vezeridis MP: Current perspectives on repeat hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma: A review. Surgery. 119:361–371. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Malafosse R, Penna C, Sa Cunha A and Nordlinger B: Surgical management of hepatic metastases from colorectal malignancies. Ann Oncol. 12:887–894. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Bentrem DJ, Dematteo RP and Blumgart LH: Surgical therapy for metastatic disease to the liver. Annu Rev Med. 56:139–156. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Pawlik TM, Schulick RD and Choti MA: Expanding criteria for resectability of colorectal liver metastases. Oncologist. 13:51–64. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Bhogal RH, Hodson J, Bartlett DC, Weston CJ, Curbishley SM, Haughton E, Williams KT, Reynolds GM, Newsome PN, Adams DH, et al: Isolation of primary human hepatocytes from normal and diseased liver tissue: A one hundred liver experience. PLoS One. 6:e182222011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Seglen PO: Preparation of rat liver cells. 3 Enzymatic requirements for tissue dispersion. Exp Cell Res. 82:391–398. 1973. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Bhogal RH, Hodson J, Bartlett DC, Weston CJ, Curbishley SM, Haughton E, Williams KT, Reynolds GM, Newsome PN, Adams DH, et al: Isolation of primary human hepatocytes from normal and diseased liver tissue: A one hundred liver experience. PloS one. 6:e182222011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Rothe GM: Electrophoresis of Enzymes: Laboratory Methods (Springer Lab Manuals). 1st edition. Springer-Verlag; Berlin, Heidelberger: pp. 39–45. 1994

11 

Holmén C, Christensson M, Pettersson E, Bratt J, Stjärne P, Karrar A and Sumitran-Holgersson S: Wegener's granulomatosis is associated with organ-specific antiendothelial cell antibodies. Kidney Int. 66:1049–1060. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Isidro RA, Bonilla FJ, Pagan H, Cruz ML, Lopez P, Godoy L, Hernandez S, Loucil-Alicea RY, Rivera-Amill V, Yamamura Y, et al: The probiotic mixture VSL#3 alters the morphology and secretion profile of both polarized and unpolarized human macrophages in a polarization-dependent manner. J Clin Cell Immunol. 5:10002272014.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Lavin Y, Winter D, Blecher-Gonen R, David E, Keren-Shaul H, Merad M, Jung S and Amit I: Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment. Cell. 159:1312–1326. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Daneker GW, Lund SA, Caughman SW, Swerlick RA, Fischer AH, Staley CA and Ades EW: Culture and characterization of sinusoidal endothelial cells isolated from human liver. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 34:370–377. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Elvevold K, Smedsrød B and Martinez I: The liver sinusoidal endothelial cell: A cell type of controversial and confusing identity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 294:G391–G400. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Podgrabinska S, Braun P, Velasco P, Kloos B, Pepper MS and Skobe M: Molecular characterization of lymphatic endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:16069–16074. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Yin C, Evason KJ, Asahina K and Stainier DY: Hepatic stellate cells in liver development, regeneration, and cancer. J Clin Invest. 123:1902–1910. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Massani M, Stecca T, Fabris L, Caratozzolo E, Ruffolo C, Furlanetto A, Morton S, Cadamuro M, Strazzabosco M and Bassi N: Isolation and characterization of biliary epithelial and stromal cells from resected human cholangiocarcinoma: A novel in vitro model to study tumorstroma interactions. Oncol Rep. 30:1143–1148. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Muff MA, Masyuk TV, Stroope AJ, Huang BQ, Splinter PL, Lee SO and Larusso NF: Development and characterization of a cholangiocyte cell line from the PCK rat, an animal model of Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease. Lab Invest. 86:940–950. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Duret C, Gerbal-Chaloin S, Ramos J, Fabre JM, Jacquet E, Navarro F, Blanc P, Sa-Cunha A, Maurel P and Daujat-Chavanieu M: Isolation, characterization, and differentiation to hepatocyte-like cells of nonparenchymal epithelial cells from adult human liver. Stem Cells. 25:1779–1790. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Terrace JD, Currie IS, Hay DC, Masson NM, Anderson RA, Forbes SJ, Parks RW and Ross JA: Progenitor cell characterization and location in the developing human liver. Stem Cells Dev. 16:771–778. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Li J, Xin J, Zhang L, Wu J, Jiang L, Zhou Q, Li J, Guo J, Cao H and Li L: Human hepatic progenitor cells express hematopoietic cell markers CD45 and CD109. Int J Med Sci. 11:65–79. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Bollyky PL and Wilson SB: CD1d-restricted T-cell subsets and dendritic cell function in autoimmunity. Immunol Cell Biol. 82:307–314. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Pfeiffer E, Kegel V, Zeilinger K, Hengstler JG, Nüssler AK, Seehofer D and Damm G: Isolation, characterization, and cultivation of human hepatocytes and non-parenchymal liver cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 240:645–656. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Werner M, Driftmann S, Kleinehr K, Kaiser GM, Mathé Z, Treckmann JW, Paul A, Skibbe K, Timm J, Canbay A, et al: All-in-one: Advanced preparation of human parenchymal and non-parenchymal liver cells. PloS One. 10:e01386552015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Aird WC: Phenotypic heterogeneity of the endothelium: II. Representative vascular beds. Circ Res. 100:174–190. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Nolan DJ, Ginsberg M, Israely E, Palikuqi B, Poulos MG, James D, Ding BS, Schachterle W, Liu Y, Rosenwaks Z, et al: Molecular signatures of tissue-specific microvascular endothelial cell heterogeneity in organ maintenance and regeneration. Dev Cell. 26:204–219. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G and Isner JM: Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 275:964–967. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Duncan GS, Andrew DP, Takimoto H, Kaufman SA, Yoshida H, Spellberg J, de la Pompa JL, Elia A, Wakeham A, Karan-Tamir B, et al: Genetic evidence for functional redundancy of platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1): CD31-deficient mice reveal PECAM-1-dependent and PECAM-1-independent functions. J Immunol. 162:3022–3030. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Hsu W, Shu SA, Gershwin E and Lian ZX: The current immune function of hepatic dendritic cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 4:321–328. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Joyee AG, Uzonna J and Yang X: Invariant NKT cells preferentially modulate the function of CD8α+ dendritic cell subset in inducing type 1 immunity against infection. J Immunol. 184:2095–2106. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Collin M, McGovern N and Haniffa M: Human dendritic cell subsets. Immunology. 140:22–30. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Dianat N, Dubois-Pot-Schneider H, Steichen C, Desterke C, Leclerc P, Raveux A, Combettes L, Weber A, Corlu A and Dubart-Kupperschmitt A: Generation of functional cholangiocyte-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells and HepaRG cells. Hepatology. 60:700–714. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Forbes S, Vig P, Poulsom R, Thomas H and Alison M: Hepatic stem cells. J Pathol. 197:510–518. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Messner S, Agarkova I, Moritz W and Kelm JM: Multi-cell type human liver microtissues for hepatotoxicity testing. Arch Toxicol. 87:209–213. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar :

36 

Schyschka L, Sánchez JJ, Wang Z, Burkhardt B, Müller-Vieira U, Zeilinger K, Bachmann A, Nadalin S, Damm G and Nussler AK: Hepatic 3D cultures but not 2D cultures preserve specific transporter activity for acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Arch Toxicol. 87:1581–1593. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Kostadinova R, Boess F, Applegate D, Suter L, Weiser T, Singer T, Naughton B and Roth A: A long-term three dimensional liver co-culture system for improved prediction of clinically relevant drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 268:1–16. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2016
Volume 36 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Dong W, Lu A, Zhao J, Yin S, Ou B and Feng H: An efficient and simple co-culture method for isolating primary human hepatic cells: Potential application for tumor microenvironment research. Oncol Rep 36: 2126-2134, 2016.
APA
Dong, W., Lu, A., Zhao, J., Yin, S., Ou, B., & Feng, H. (2016). An efficient and simple co-culture method for isolating primary human hepatic cells: Potential application for tumor microenvironment research. Oncology Reports, 36, 2126-2134. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.4979
MLA
Dong, W., Lu, A., Zhao, J., Yin, S., Ou, B., Feng, H."An efficient and simple co-culture method for isolating primary human hepatic cells: Potential application for tumor microenvironment research". Oncology Reports 36.4 (2016): 2126-2134.
Chicago
Dong, W., Lu, A., Zhao, J., Yin, S., Ou, B., Feng, H."An efficient and simple co-culture method for isolating primary human hepatic cells: Potential application for tumor microenvironment research". Oncology Reports 36, no. 4 (2016): 2126-2134. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.4979