Evaluation of expression of cancer stem cell markers and fusion gene in synovial sarcoma: Insights into histogenesis and pathogenesis

  • Authors:
    • Yang Zhou
    • Dongdong Chen
    • Yan Qi
    • Ruixue Liu
    • Shugang Li
    • Hong Zou
    • Jiaojiao Lan
    • Xinxin Ju
    • Jinfang Jiang
    • Weihua Liang
    • Yaoyuan Shen
    • Lijuan Pang
    • Feng Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 2, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5617
  • Pages: 3351-3360
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is an aggressive soft tissue tumor, with uncertain histological and cellular origin. SYT-SSX is considered to be responsible for sarcoma initiation and progression. The histogenesis and pathogenesis of this tumor are poorly understood, and prognosis of patients of SS is unsatisfactory. Recent studies have shown an association of cancer stem cells with the initiation and development of tumors. We explored immunohistochemical expression level of stem cell associated markers to determine the possible histogenesis and pathogenesis of SS. Fusion gene SYT-SSX was tested to assess diagnostic value and the molecular pathological features. We obtained the clinicopathological data of 20 SS patients, immunohistochemical staining were used to evaluate stem cell-associated markers included CD133, CD29, CD44, nestin, and ALDH1. Fusion gene SYT-SSX was tested by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Twenty SS cases were observed and the positive immuno­expression results showed CD133 (17/20), CD29 (11/20), CD44 (11/20), nestin (6/20), and ALDH1 (5/20). Fusion gene SYT-SSX was successfully detected by RT-PCR from 18 available samples. The expression of stem cell-associated markers (CD133, CD29, CD44, Nestin, and ALDH1) and clinical data (age, gender, sites, tumor size, histological type, tumor stage, and distant metastases) did not show statistically significant relationship (P>0.05), whereas, statistically significance between ALDH1 and metastases was observed (P<0.01). The ALDH1 positive synovial sarcoma (ALDH1+ SS) cases had significantly poor prognosis compared to ALDH1 negative synovial sarcoma (ALDH1- SS) cases (P<0.05). Immunohistochemical results indicated different expression levels of the five cancer stem cell markers in SS suggesting that SS may arise from cancer stem cells. Fusion gene SYT-SSX may play a critical role in the molecular pathological of SS.

Introduction

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a malignant tumor that accounts for 7–10% of soft tissue sarcomas, which arises mostly in young adults with high risk of metastasis and recurrence (1). SS occurs in a wide variety of organs, with higher incidence near the joints of the lower extremities (2). The histological types of SS include biphasic type synovial sarcoma (BSS), monophasic type synovial sarcoma (MSS), and poorly differential type synovial sarcomas (PDSS) (1). Immunohistochemistry plays an important role in the identification and diagnosis of SS (3). EMA and CD99 are the commonly used markers for diagnosis of epithelial and mesenchymal tumors, recently, they have also been used in the diagnosis of SS. Approximately 60% of CD99 expression was positive and may be related to the histological type of SS. Most of the studies reported that CD99 showed high levels of expression in single phase synovial sarcoma and poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma. The positive expression rate of CD99 in the poorly differentiated SS was >90% (2).

The cellular origin of SS remains unknown, SS is currently classified as a miscellaneous tumor of uncertain histological origin, which is considered to arise from undifferentiated mesenchymal cells (2). Studies have supported the histogenesis and initiation of tumor may involve cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) that may derive from a small population of pluripotent stem cells (46). These stem-like cells initiate and sustain tumor growth in epithelial tumors including various soft tissue sarcoma such as synovial sarcoma (712). Specific surface markers such as CD133, CD44 and nestin have been identified to isolate the cancer stem cells in breast cancer, pancreatic cancer and gastric cancer (1315). However, the relationship between SS and tumor stem cells are still poorly understood. Studies have indicated that CD133 and other tumor stem cell-related markers are highly expressed in SS. The identification of cancer stem cell marker expression level has contributed to the understanding of the pathogenesis and origin of SS, and provides a new perspective for the diagnosis and treatment of SS.

Recent studies showed that >90% of synovial sarcoma with chromosomal translocation t(X;18) (p11.2;q11.2) leads to formation of SYT-SSX fusion protein (16). It is generally believed that the SYT-SSX fusion gene is an important event in the early stage of synovial sarcoma. SYT-SSX is thought to be responsible for sarcoma initiation and development. The value of SYT-SSX fusion gene in the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma has been widely recognized, however, the mechanism remains elusive (17).

This study explored immunohistochemical expression level of stem cell-associated markers to determine the possible histogenesis and pathogenesis of SS. Fusion gene SYT-SSX was evaluated to assess diagnostic value and the molecular pathological features.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue specimens

A total of 20 SS patients were included from the Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Shihezi University School of Medicine between 1978 and 2016. Histopathological diagnosis was evaluated independently by two certified pathologists from the Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Shihezi University School of Medicine. The collected data included age, gender, sites, tumor size, histological type, tumor stage, molecular pathology, metastases, and the follow-up surveys (Table I). The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine. Consent was obtained from the subjects for participation in the study and the use of their tissue.

Table I.

Clinical data in 20 cases of synovial sarcomas.

Table I.

Clinical data in 20 cases of synovial sarcomas.

Patient IDGender/AgeSiteSize (cm)DiagnosisTNMFusion geneMetastasesOutcome
1M/14Left elbow fossa6MFSSIIBSYT-SSX2NMDOD
2F/19Left thigh7.5MFSSIIISYT-SSXNMNA
3M/32Oral3MFSSISYT-SSX1LungDOD
4M/37Right elbow2MFSSIIISYT-SSX2NMDOD
5M/40Left hip22MFSSIVSYT-SSX2LiverAlive
6M/47Left leg5MFSSIVSYT-SSX2LungDOD
7F/40Left bone7.5PDSSIIISYT-SSXNMDOD
8F/10Right elbow5BSSIVSYT-SSX1Bone marrow cavityDOD
9F/15Right neck4BSSIIANANMNA
10F/21Right thigh7.5BSSISYT-SSX1NMAlive
11F/22Left heel3BSSIIASYT-SSX1NMNA
12F/32Left groinNABSSIIANANMDOD
13M/36Left forearm11BSSIIISYT-SSX1NMDOD
14F/37Left hand and forearm6BSSIIISYT-SSX1NMDOD
15M/40Right femoral2.8BSSIVSYT-SSX1NMDOD
16F/43Right kidney13BSSIIISYT-SSX1NMDOD
17M/52Left ilium5BSSIIISYT-SSX2NMAlive
18F/55Right foot10BSSIVSYT-SSX1LungDOD
19M/55Left thigh5.2BSSISYT-SSX1LungDOD
20M/64Left hip11.5BSSIVSYT-SSX1LungDOD

[i] BSS, biphasic synovial sarcoma; MFSS, monophasic fibrous synovial sarcoma; PDSS, poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma; F, female; M, male; NM, not metastasizing; DOD, died of disease; NA, not available.

Immunohistochemistry

Sections (4 µm) prepared from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue were obtained for immunohistochemical analysis. EnVisions two-step immunohistochemical kit (EnVision; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) were used to detect specific target proteins. Briefly, the baked sections were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol. Then sections were performed by microwave in citrate buffer (pH 6.0), heated at 100°C and quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide. The samples were incubated with specific target antibodies at 4°C overnight. The information of stem cell markers (including CD133, CD29, CD44, nestin and ALDH1) are shown in Table II. Sections were then washed with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies at 37°C. 3, 3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used as a chromogen. Finally, slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, gradient alcohol and xylene dehydration, and mounted. The expression of stem cell markers was scored semi-quantitatively according to the percentage of positive cells and staining intensity. The samples were scored according to the staining intensity and the ratio of positive cells as follows: distribution (0, 0%; 1, ≤10%; 2, 10–50%; 3, ≥50%) and intensity (0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong). A score of 0 was given for sections with no staining, and 1 was the lowest positive score. The product of the two scores determined the final score values; a score of 0 indicated negative expression (−), whereas a score of 1–3 represented weak positive expression (+). Similarly, a score of 4–12 was considered as strong positive expression (++). All of the results were confirmed by at least two senior pathologists independently.

Table II.

Primary antibodies used in the immunohistochemistry staining.

Table II.

Primary antibodies used in the immunohistochemistry staining.

AntigenAntibody speciesLocationCompanyClone numberDilution
CD133Rabbit PolyclonalCytoplasmARP, Waltham, MA, USA05-PA10211:200
CD29Rabbit monoclonalCytoplasmAbcam, Cambridge, UKEP1041Y1:800
CD44Mouse monoclonalCytomembraneDako, Glostrup, DenmarkDF14851:300
NestinRabbit monoclonalCytoplasmAbcam, Cambridge, UKSP1031:200
ALDH1Rabbit monoclonalCytoplasmAbcam, Cambridge, UKEP1933Y1:200
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from 18 of 20 paraffin-embedded tissues of SS using TRIzol, the other 2 cases were from consultations which did not provide paraffin tissue. Since 2 of 18 paraffin tissues could not be evaluated by RT-PCR because of the low RNA quality, 16 cases of RNA were successfully tested. To detect SYT-SSX transcript and positive control β-actin transcript, the design of the primers is shown in Table III. One-step RT-PCR was conducted using RNA PCR kit. The PCR products were visualized by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels.

Table III.

The primers of SYT-SSX and β-actin.

Table III.

The primers of SYT-SSX and β-actin.

PrimerSequence
SYT 5′-CCAGCAGAGGCCTTATGGATA-3′
SSX 5′-TTTGTGGGCCAGATGCTTC-3′
  SSX1 5′-GTGCAGTTGTTTCCCATCG-3′
  SSX2 5′-GCACAGCTCTTTCCCATCA-3′
β-actin-F 5′-CAGTTTGGAGCTCCTGGAAG-3′
β-actin-R 5′-TGCAAATCCAGGGTGCAGTG-3′
Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by SPSS software 17.0, and Fisher exact test was used to compare the relationship between the stem cell associated markers expression and clinicopathological data. Two-tailed P-values at <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical findings

The SS patients comprised of 10 males and 10 females, with a median age of 37 years (range: 10–64 years). All samples were primary tumors located in the limbs (17 cases) and extra-limb (oral, kidney, and neck). According to the follow-up survey, 7 patients had a poor prognosis with distant metastases (5 patients with lung metastasis, 1 patient with liver metastasis, and 1 patient with bone metastasis). Three patients still live with disease after presentation. Three patients dropped out, the other 14 patients died of their disease (Table I). ALDH1 SS cases had good prognosis with higher survival rate than ALDH1+ SS cases (P<0.05) (Fig. 1, Table IV).

Table IV.

P-value of the cumulate survival of ALDH1+ and ALDH1− synovial sarcoma patients.

Table IV.

P-value of the cumulate survival of ALDH1+ and ALDH1− synovial sarcoma patients.

Overall comparisons

TestChi-squaredfSig
Log Rank (Mantel-Cox)18.1901<0.001

[i] Test of survival distributions for the different level of type.

Pathological findings

According to the fourth WHO diagnostic criteria SS can be divided into biphasic synovial sarcoma (BSS), monophasic fibrous synovial sarcoma (MFSS) and poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma (PDSS). Histologically, the main characteristic of synovial sarcoma is epithelial and mesenchymal biphasic differentiation. In our study, the median tumor size was 7.2 cm, with a range from 2 to 22 cm. The cases were composed of 13 biphasic synovial sarcoma (BSS), 6 monophasic fibrous synovial sarcoma (MFSS), and 1 poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma (PDSS). Biphasic SS contained epithelial cells and spindle cells. The variable biphasic differentiation presented glands with a tubular or papillary architecture or solid nests with a population of oval or rounded cells. Epithelioid cells formed glands. Glands are irregular and covered by columnar or cuboidal cells. Tumor cells had eosinophilic cytoplasm, nucleus was round or oval and hyperchromatic (Fig. 2A and B). The spindle cells resemble histologically the monophasic fibrous synovial sarcoma and were ovoid to uniform spindle-shaped with elongated nuclear features forming dense cellular sheets and fascicles. The cell atypia was inconspicuous with pale-stained or eosinophilic cytoplasm. Nucleus showed short spindle shape, granular chromatin, mesenchymal vascular slightly enriched, slit-shaped thin wall (Fig. 2C). Poorly differentiated type synovial sarcoma was composed of round hyperchromatic atypical tumor cells with diffuse distribution. The cell nucleus was large, obviously atypical and eosinophilic (Fig. 2D).

Immunohistochemical findings of stem cell marker expression in SS

In 20 specimens, 17 were stained positive for CD133, 11 of 20 were positive for CD29 and CD44, 6 of 20 were positive for nestin (Tables V and VI). CD133 was detected in epithelial cells (Figs. 3A and B, and 4A and B). CD29 were also detected in the vascular endothelial cells (Figs. 3C and D, and 4C and D). CD44 and nestin displayed focal immunoreactivity in spindle cells (Figs. 3E-H; 4E-H). Of the 20 specimens, 5 were ALDH1-positive in scattered tumor cells (Figs. 3J and 4J) and negative in 15 cases (Figs. 3I and 4I). There was no statistically significant relationship between the expression of stem cell-associated markers (CD133, CD29, CD44, nestin, and ALDH1) and clinical data (age, gender, sites, tumor size, histological type, tumor stage, and metastases) (P>0.05), the expression of ALDH1 was significantly related to the metastases of SS (P<0.05) (Tables VII and VIII).

Table V.

Immunohistochemical expression for 5 stem cell markers in synovial sarcoma.

Table V.

Immunohistochemical expression for 5 stem cell markers in synovial sarcoma.

Stem cell markers

Patient IDCD133CD29CD44NestinALDH1
  1++++
  2++
  3+++
  4++++
  5++++
  6++
  7+
  8+++
  9++++
10+++++
11++
12+++
13+++++
14+++++
15+
16++++
17++++++++
18+++
19++++
20++++++++

[i] -, negative; +, weak positive; ++, positive.

Table VI.

Five stem cell marker expression in synovial sarcoma.

Table VI.

Five stem cell marker expression in synovial sarcoma.

Positive

MarkersNegative (−)(+)(++)Positive rate (%)a (n)
CD133  39885 (17)
CD29  94755 (11)
CD44  94755 (11)
Nestin144230 (6)
ALDH1154125 (5)

a Included all weak positive (+) and positive (++). Positive expression: CD133 (17/20), CD29 (11/20), CD44 (11/20), nestin (6/20) and ALDH1 (5/20).

Table VII.

Association between expression of 5 stem cell markers, fusion gene and clinicopathological features.

Table VII.

Association between expression of 5 stem cell markers, fusion gene and clinicopathological features.

CD133 CD29 CD44



FactorsNegativePositiveχ2 valueP-valueNegativePositiveχ2 valueP-valueNegativePositiveχ2 valueP-value
Age 0.131>0.05 0.067>0.05 0.067>0.05
  <50213 78 78
  ≥501  4 23 23
Gender 0.392>0.05 1.181>0.05 0.202>0.05
  F2  8 37 55
  M1  9 64 46
Size (cm) 1.644>0.05 0.024>0.05 2.170>0.05
  <50  6 33 42
  ≥5310 67 49
TNM 0.669>0.05 0.900>0.05 3.104>0.05
  I, II110 36 38
  III, IV2  7 65 63
Metastases 1.900>0.05 0.642>0.05 0.020>0.05
  +0  7 43 34
  −310 58 67
Fusion gene 1.039>0.05 0.042>0.05 0.95>0.05
  SYT-SSX12  9 56 56
  SYT-SSX20  5 23 14
Histology 1.644>0.05 1.310>0.05 2.328>0.05
  MFSS0  6 42 15
  BSS310 58 76

[i] BSS, biphasic synovial sarcoma; MFSS, monophasic fibrous synovial sarcoma; PDSS, poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma.

Table VIII.

Association between expression of 5 stem cell markers and clinicopathological features.

Table VIII.

Association between expression of 5 stem cell markers and clinicopathological features.

Nestin ALDH1 Fusion gene



FactorsNegativePositiveχ2 valueP-valueNegativePositiveχ2 valueP-valueSYT-SSX1SYT-SSX2χ2 valueP-value
Age 2.260>0.05 0.800>0.05 0.097>0.05
  <50134 123   84
  ≥50  12   32   31
Gender 0.952>0.05 0.267>0.05 4.364>0.05
  F  82   73   60
  M  64   82   55
Size (cm) 0.012>0.05 3.132>0.05 0.097>0.05
  <5  42   60   31
  ≥5  94   85   84
TNM 0.087>0.05 0>0.05 0.428>0.05
  I, II  83   93   41
  III, IV  63   62   74
Metastases 0.848>0.05 12.3810.001 0.042>0.05
  +  43 130   52
  −103   25   63
Fusion gene 0.019>0.05 0.873>0.05
  SYT-SSX1  74   92
  SYT-SSX2  32   32
Histology 0.903>0.05 3.041>0.05 8.0450.013
  MFSS  51   94   14
  BSS  85   80 101

[i] BSS, biphasic synovial sarcoma; MFSS, monophasic fibrous synovial sarcoma; PDSS, poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma.

RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted and evaluated successfully from 18 cases of SS. The β-actin was tested in 247 bp. The results of RT-PCR showed that fusion gene SYT-SSX (98 bp) was available in all the cases, SYT-SSX1 and SYT-SSX2 fusion gene were tested in 118 bp. SYT-SSX1 and SYT-SSX2 transcript were detected in 11 cases and 5 cases respectively. Among 11 cases of SYT-SSX1, 10 cases were BSS and 1 case was MFSS, the 5 cases of SYT-SSX2 included 4 cases of MFSS and 1 case of BSS. Two cases showed no explicit typing (Table I; Figs. 5 and 6).

Discussion

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is classified as uncertain differentiation tumor in the 4th WHO Classification of soft tissue tumors that occur in a widely variety of organs, especially near the joints of the limbs. SS occurs more frequently in young adults, in males more common than females. SS is a highly malignant soft tissue tumor with poor prognosis, the recurrence rate was approximately 50% within two years after operation and metastasis occurred in 40% of patients. The 5-year survival rate was <30%, lung and lymph node metastasis may be negative prognostic factors of long-term survival. Thus, confirming the tumor cellular and tissue origin is of great significance in the process of making a correct diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SS (1,16,17).

In the present study, distant metastasis occurred in 7 patients, in addition to 3 patients lost to follow-up and 3 patients still alive, the other 14 patients all died of a tumor. Recent studies supported that cancer is initiated by a population of tumor cells with stem cell characteristics (1820). The cancer stem cell hypothesis suggests that cancer stem cells may contribute to the initiation, progression and recurrence of cancer (21,22). Expression of cancer stem cell makers have been reported in leukemia, breast cancer, colon cancer and sarcoma (7,8,10,11,23,24). CD133 was first described as a surface antigen specific to human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, but has also recently been recognized as a common stem cell marker (14,2528). CD133 may be responsible for tumorigenesis and represents a pool of tumor progenitor cells or tumor stem cells (12). Terry et al isolated a small amount of CD133+ cells from SS cell line for the first time, this suggested the relationship between SS and cancer stem-like cells (25).

In our immunohistochemical study, CD133 was positively expressed in 85% SS cases. It implies SS may be derived from stem cells and progenitor cells. ALDH1 has been considered to be cancer stem cell marker in lung cancer, liver cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer. Recently, some evidence proved that ALDH1 staining was observed as stem cell marker in soft tissue tumors, such as solitary fibrous tumor (29,30). Bouvier et al (29) reported that ALDH1 expression may play an important role in distinguishing SS from soft tissue tumors such as solitary fibrous tumors. Many studies have found that the expression of ALDH1 protein is related to the histologic subtypes, recurrence, metastasis and invasion of the tumor. Increasing evidence has demonstrated ALDH1 as therapeutic target and a malignant tumor stem cell marker that indicates poor prognosis for tumors, decreased ALDH1 may suggest a good prognosis (31,32).

In our study, only 5 cases were positive for ALDH1, while ALDH1-positive cases are characteristic of poorly differentiated, tumors ≥5 cm, and TNM III/IV, especially in metastases. ALDH1 SS cases had better survival rate than ALDH1+ SS cases. This suggested that the SS may originate from cancer stem like cells. The high expression of ALDH1 may suggest an immature undifferentiated state and high malignancy, which leads to poor prognosis. The high expression of ALDH1 may be responsible for the failure of traditional chemotherapy of some malignancies including colon cancer (33), prostate cancer (34) and breast cancer (35).

More studies need to be done to explore the role of ALDH1 in the development of SS. SS occur in multiple sites of the body, the cellular origin may be cells with multiple differentiation ability, such as stem cells. Studies show high expression of MSC surface markers in SS. CD29, nestin, and CD44 are surface proteins associated with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (14,15,36). MSC markers CD29 and CD44 displayed high expression (55%). The mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells markers CD29 or CD44 could be identified and separated from SS, this suggested that SS may originate from mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (37). Recently, nestin was considered as a stem cell or progenitor cell surface marker. Nestin was detected in 6 SS cases in this investigation, it was positive in MFSS or spindle cells of BSS in our study. This suggested spindle cells of SS may originate from MSCs. However, the relationship between stem cells and SS is poorly understood, a larger number of SS patients needs to be explored for the histogenesis of SS.

SS is characterized by a chromosomal translocation t(X;18) (p11.2;q11.2), and this molecular genetic feature does not appear in other tumors (3840). SYT-SSX was tested positive in 93% cases of SS. The function of SYT-SSX fusion protein is not clear, but Naka et al reported that SS may be a stem cell malignancy because of the dysregulation of self-renewal and differentiation driven by SYT-SSX fusion protein (37). Garcia et al (41) reported that mesenchymal stem cells may be reprogrammed by SS-associated protein SYT-SSX, the aberrant differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells were caused by SYT-SSX2. However, more studies need to be done to explore the relationship between stem cells and SYT-SSX fusion gene. Saito (42) reported that the tumor phenotype may be determined by the SYT-SSX fusion gene. Our study showed that 77% of BSS had the SYT-SSX1 fusion gene (10/13) and 67% MFSS the SYT-SSX2 fusion gene (4/6). SYT-SSX can be used as an excellent diagnostic marker for SS. In our study, SYT-SSX was detected in 18 cases, of these, 7 had distant metastasis (1 case metastasis to bone, 1 case metastasis to liver, 5 cases metastasis to lung), 14 patients died of the disease (3 patients were not available, 3 patients are still alive). SYT-SSX1 may be related to the high proliferation rate of tumor cells, tumor distant metastasis and poor prognosis (3840). SYT-SSX1 fusion gene was detected in 71.4% (5/7) of cases of SS with distant metastasis. Gene therapy for SYT-SSX will be of great importance for the diagnostics, treatment and prognosis of SS.

In conclusion, we detected stem cell marker (CD133, CD29, CD44, nestin, and ALDH1) expression to explore the histogenesis and cellular origin of SS. The immunohistochemical findings for the stem cell markers indicated that SS may originate from MSCs. The RT-PCR results showed fusion gene SYT-SSX may play an important role in the tumor initiation and progression of SS. Due to the characteristic expression of stem cell markers and SYT-SSX for SS, these may provide new efficient drug design and therapy strategy in future. Our results need to be confirmed by further exploration to study the function of cancer stem cell markers and fusion gene SYT-SSX for histogenesis and pathogenesis of SS.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81560053), the Corps Doctor Foundation (no. 2014BB018), Shihezi University Outstanding Youth Science and Technology Talent Cultivation Plan (2013ZRKXJQ05, 2015ZRKXJQ07), the Pairing Program of Shihezi University with Eminent Scholar in Elite University (SDJDZ201508), Research Project of High Level Talents of Shihezi University (RCZX201549).

References

1 

Weiss SW and Goldblum JR: Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors. 30. 5th. Mosby Elsevier; Philadelphia, PA: 2008

2 

Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn P and Mertens F: WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th. IARC Press; 2013

3 

Haldar M, Hancock JD, Coffin CM, Lessnick SL and Capecchi MR: A conditional mouse model of synovial sarcoma: Insights into a myogenic origin. Cancer Cell. 11:375–388. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Lapidot T, Sirard C, Vormoor J, Murdoch B, Hoang T, Caceres-Cortes J, Minden M, Paterson B, Caligiuri MA and Dick JE: A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature. 367:645–648. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Hemmati HD, Nakano I, Lazareff JA, Masterman-Smith M, Geschwind DH, Bronner-Fraser M and Kornblum HI: Cancerous stem cells can arise from pediatric brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:pp. 15178–15183. 2003; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ and Clarke MF: Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:pp. 3983–3988. 2003; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Ponti D, Costa A, Zaffaroni N, Pratesi G, Petrangolini G, Coradini D, Pilotti S, Pierotti MA and Daidone MG: Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties. Cancer Res. 65:5506–5511. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Chu P, Clanton DJ, Snipas TS, Lee J, Mitchell E, Nguyen ML, Hare E and Peach RJ: Characterization of a subpopulation of colon cancer cells with stem cell-like properties. Int J Cancer. 124:1312–1321. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Zeimet AG, Reimer D, Sopper S, Boesch M, Martowicz A, Roessler J, Wiedemair AM, Rumpold H, Untergasser G, Concin N, et al: Ovarian cancer stem cells. Neoplasma. 59:747–755. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Walter D, Satheesha S, Albrecht P, Bornhauser BC, D'Alessandro V, Oesch SM, Rehrauer H, Leuschner I, Koscielniak E, Gengler C, et al: CWS Study Group: CD133 positive embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma stem-like cell population is enriched in rhabdospheres. PLoS One. 6:e195062011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Mutsaers AJ and Walkley CR: Cells of origin in osteosarcoma: Mesenchymal stem cells or osteoblast committed cells? Bone. 62:56–63. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Liu A, Feng B, Gu W, Cheng X, Tong T, Zhang H and Hu Y: The CD133+ subpopulation of the SW982 human synovial sarcoma cell line exhibits cancer stem-like characteristics. Int J Oncol. 42:1399–1407. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kekarainen T, Mannelin S, Laine J and Jaatinen T: Optimization of immunomagnetic separation for cord blood-derived hematopoietic stem cells. BMC Cell Biol. 7:302006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Schieker M, Pautke C, Haasters F, Schieker J, Docheva D, Böcker W, Guelkan H, Neth P, Jochum M and Mutschler W: Human mesenchymal stem cells at the single-cell level: Simultaneous seven-colour immunofluorescence. J Anat. 210:592–599. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Méndez-Ferrer S, Michurina TV, Ferraro F, Mazloom AR, Macarthur BD, Lira SA, Scadden DT, Ma'ayan A, Enikolopov GN and Frenette PS: Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature. 466:829–834. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Clark J, Rocques PJ, Crew AJ, Gill S, Shipley J, Chan AM, Gusterson BA and Cooper CS: Identification of novel genes, SYT and SSX, involved in the t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) translocation found in human synovial sarcoma. Nat Genet. 7:502–508. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Ladanyi M: Fusions of the SYT and SSX genes in synovial sarcoma. Oncogene. 20:5755–5762. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Boman BM and Wicha MS: Cancer stem cells: A step toward the cure. J Clin Oncol. 26:2795–2799. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Jung Y, Bauer G and Nolta JA: Concise review: Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells: progress toward safe clinical products. Stem Cells. 30:42–47. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Sadikovic B, Graham C, Ho M, Zielenska M and Somers GR: Immunohistochemical expression and cluster analysis of mesenchymal and neural stem cell-associated proteins in pediatric soft tissue sarcomas. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 14:259–272. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Santagata S, Ligon KL and Hornick JL: Embryonic stem cell transcription factor signatures in the diagnosis of primary and metastatic germ cell tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 31:836–845. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Ben-Porath I, Thomson MW, Carey VJ, Ge R, Bell GW, Regev A and Weinberg RA: An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat Genet. 40:499–507. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Passegué E: Hematopoietic stem cells, leukemic stem cells and chronic myelogenous leukemia. Cell Cycle. 4:266–268. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Nakanishi M, Niidome T, Matsuda S, Akaike A, Kihara T and Sugimoto H: Microglia-derived interleukin-6 and leukaemia inhibitory factor promote astrocytic differentiation of neural stem/progenitor cells. Eur J Neurosci. 25:649–658. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Terry J and Nielsen T: Expression of CD133 in synovial sarcoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 18:159–165. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Collins AT, Berry PA, Hyde C, Stower MJ and Maitland NJ: Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 65:10946–10951. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Okamoto H, Fujishima F, Nakamura Y, Zuguchi M, Ozawa Y, Takahashi Y, Miyata G, Kamei T, Nakano T, Taniyama Y, et al: Significance of CD133 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 11:512013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Zhang D, Sun B, Zhao X, Ma Y, Ji R, Gu Q, Dong X, Li J, Liu F, Jia X, et al: Twist1 expression induced by sunitinib accelerates tumor cell vasculogenic mimicry by increasing the population of CD133+ cells in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 13:2072014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Bouvier C, Bertucci F, Métellus P, Finetti P, de Paula A Maues, Forest F, Mokhtari K, Miquel C, Birnbaum D, Vasiljevic A, et al: ALDH1 is an immunohistochemical diagnostic marker for solitary fibrous tumours and haemangiopericytomas of the meninges emerging from gene profiling study. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 1:102013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

England DM, Hochholzer L and McCarthy MJ: Localized benign and malignant fibrous tumors of the pleura. A clinicopathologic review of 223 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 13:640–658. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Liu Y, Lv DL, Duan JJ, Xu SL, Zhang JF, Yang XJ, Zhang X, Cui YH, Bian XW and Yu SC: ALDH1A1 expression correlates with clinicopathologic features and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 14:4442014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Kuroda T, Hirohashi Y, Torigoe T, Yasuda K, Takahashi A, Asanuma H, Morita R, Mariya T, Asano T, Mizuuchi M, et al: ALDH1-high ovarian cancer stem-like cells can be isolated from serous and clear cell adenocarcinoma cells, and ALDH1 high expression is associated with poor prognosis. PLoS One. 8:e651582013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Matsika A, Srinivasan B, Day C, Mader SA, Kiernan DM, Broomfield A, Fu J, Hooper JD, Kench JG and Samaratunga H: Cancer stem cell markers in prostate cancer: An immunohistochemical study of ALDH1, SOX2 and EZH2. Pathology. 47:622–628. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Nishida S, Hirohashi Y, Torigoe T, Inoue R, Kitamura H, Tanaka T, Takahashi A, Asanuma H, Masumori N, Tsukamoto T, et al: Prostate cancer stem-like cells/cancer-initiating cells have an autocrine system of hepatocyte growth factor. Cancer Sci. 104:431–436. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Ieni A and Tuccari G: Comments on the ‘Prognostic impact and clinicopathological correlation of CD133 and ALDH1 expression in invasive breast cancer’. J Breast Cancer. 19:96–98. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Vassilopoulos A, Chisholm C, Lahusen T, Zheng H and Deng CX: A critical role of CD29 and CD49f in mediating metastasis for cancer-initiating cells isolated from a Brca1-associated mouse model of breast cancer. Oncogene. 33:5477–5482. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Naka N, Takenaka S, Araki N, Miwa T, Hashimoto N, Yoshioka K, Joyama S, Hamada K, Tsukamoto Y, Tomita Y, et al: Synovial sarcoma is a stem cell malignancy. Stem Cells. 28:1119–1131. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Brett D, Whitehouse S, Antonson P, Shipley J, Cooper C and Goodwin G: The SYT protein involved in the t(X;18) synovial sarcoma translocation is a transcriptional activator localised in nuclear bodies. Hum Mol Genet. 6:1559–1564. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Hayakawa K, Ikeya M, Fukuta M, Woltjen K, Tamaki S, Takahara N, Kato T Jr, Sato S, Otsuka T and Toguchida J: Identification of target genes of synovial sarcoma-associated fusion oncoprotein using human pluripotent stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 432:713–719. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Cironi L, Provero P, Riggi N, Janiszewska M, Suva D, Suva ML, Kindler V and Stamenkovic I: Epigenetic features of human mesenchymal stem cells determine their permissiveness for induction of relevant transcriptional changes by SYT-SSX1. PLoS One. 4:e79042009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Garcia CB, Shaffer CM, Alfaro MP, Smith AL, Sun J, Zhao Z, Young PP, VanSaun MN and Eid JE: Reprogramming of mesenchymal stem cells by the synovial sarcoma-associated oncogene SYT-SSX2. Oncogene. 31:2323–2334. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Saito T: The SYT-SSX fusion protein and histological epithelial differentiation in synovial sarcoma: Relationship with extracellular matrix remodeling. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 6:2272–2279. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2017
Volume 37 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhou Y, Chen D, Qi Y, Liu R, Li S, Zou H, Lan J, Ju X, Jiang J, Liang W, Liang W, et al: Evaluation of expression of cancer stem cell markers and fusion gene in synovial sarcoma: Insights into histogenesis and pathogenesis. Oncol Rep 37: 3351-3360, 2017.
APA
Zhou, Y., Chen, D., Qi, Y., Liu, R., Li, S., Zou, H. ... Li, F. (2017). Evaluation of expression of cancer stem cell markers and fusion gene in synovial sarcoma: Insights into histogenesis and pathogenesis. Oncology Reports, 37, 3351-3360. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5617
MLA
Zhou, Y., Chen, D., Qi, Y., Liu, R., Li, S., Zou, H., Lan, J., Ju, X., Jiang, J., Liang, W., Shen, Y., Pang, L., Li, F."Evaluation of expression of cancer stem cell markers and fusion gene in synovial sarcoma: Insights into histogenesis and pathogenesis". Oncology Reports 37.6 (2017): 3351-3360.
Chicago
Zhou, Y., Chen, D., Qi, Y., Liu, R., Li, S., Zou, H., Lan, J., Ju, X., Jiang, J., Liang, W., Shen, Y., Pang, L., Li, F."Evaluation of expression of cancer stem cell markers and fusion gene in synovial sarcoma: Insights into histogenesis and pathogenesis". Oncology Reports 37, no. 6 (2017): 3351-3360. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5617