The DG75 B-cell lymphoma line exhibits biclonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangement

  • Authors:
    • Zongli Qi
    • Yuan Li
    • Jun Hu
    • Hua Guo
    • Xiangrong Zhao
    • Guanghua Wang
    • Jinwei Gao
    • Qiaoxia Hu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 15, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2012.22
  • Pages: 115-118
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Immunoglobulin (Ig) and T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement (GR) studies have been successfully employed to investigate the clonality and cell lineage of various lymphoid malignancies. Several lymphoma cell lines, such as BJAB, RAJI, DG75 and Jurkat cell lines, were often used as the positive controls in GR detection assays. Of those, the DG75 B-cell lymphoma line was found to exhibit biclonality [two or more homoduplex and heteroduplex bands in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product of clonality assay] in the PCR of GR detection assays. To further explore these characteristics of the biclonal phenomenon, the PCR products were purified and cloned into a pEGM-T clone vector. The sequences were analyzed using DNA analysis software. The results demonstrated that the two bands originated from two forms of GR of DG75 cell lines, i.e., DG75 is a biclonal cell line in Ig GRs, which has not been reported before.

Introduction

Cystatin C (Cys C) is a non-glycosylated cationic 13.3-kDa protein belonging to the cystatin superfamily of cysteine protease inhibitors (13). Cys C is produced by nucleated cells and is secreted into the blood at a constant rate (13). It is freely filtered through the glomerular membrane, completely re-absorbed and then catabolized in the proximal tubular cells (13). Thus, similarly to creatinine, the biological fate of Cys C is a good endogenous marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

In patients with esophageal cancer, cisplatin (CDDP) is used as a neoadjuvant or as a post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (4,5). When CDDP-based chemotherapy is administered, antiemetic drugs, such as dexamethasone (DEX), 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists or aprepitant are administered to prevent treatment-associated nausea and vomiting (6). A transient elevation was previously reported in serum Cys C concentration during the perioperative chemotherapy period in patients with esophageal cancer. We suggested that renal function estimates determined on the basis of serum Cys C levels during this treatment period might be misleading (7).

To understand the effect of DEX and other drugs in detail, it is crucial to investigate the renal effects associated with serum Cys C concentration. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of DEX to induce Cys C secretion in human cancer cell lines, as well as the effect of CDDP, 5-FU and mifepristone (RU-486) on Cys C secretion.

Materials and methods

Materials

DEX, 5-FU and CDDP were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). RU-486 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), while 2-(4-iodophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, mono-sodium salt (WST-1) and 1-methoxy-5-methylphenazinium methyl sulfate were purchased from Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan). The remaining reagents were of the highest grade commercially available for biochemical use.

Cell lines and cell culture

The KYSE150 human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, A549 human non-small cell lung cancer and the Caki-2 human renal carcinoma cell lines were used in this study. KYSE150 and A549 cells were obtained from the Health Science Research Resources Bank (Osaka, Japan), and Caki-2 cells were obtained from Summit Pharmaceuticals International (Tokyo, Japan). KYSE150, and Caki-2 cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen), 100 U/ml penicillin G and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). A549 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin G and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. The cells were seeded in culture flasks, cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2-95% air at 37°C, and subcultured with 0.05% trypsin-0.02% EDTA (Invitrogen).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assay for Cys C

For the quantification of Cys C protein released from the cells into the culture medium, KYSE150, A549 and Caki-2 cells were seeded in 60-mm dishes at 1×106 cells/dish and incubated overnight prior to treatment with each drug for the indicated periods. The final concentrations of the drugs during exposure were 100 nM, 10, 2 and 1 μM for DEX, CDDP, 5-FU and RU-486, respectively. The concentrations of DEX, CDDP and 5-FU were set to mimic clinical conditions (79). To examine the inhibitory effects on DEX-induced Cys C secretion, CDDP, 5-FU and RU-486 were added to the culture medium containing DEX at the abovementioned concentrations for each drug. Control cells were incubated with the culture medium without drugs in each experiment. The culture medium was collected and analyzed with the Quantikine® Human Cystatin C Immunoassay kit (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and harvested with lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich). Cell lysates were then vortexed at room temperature for 15 min, and centrifuged at 13,000 × g at room temperature for 15 min. Cell lysates were assayed for total protein levels by using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) Protein assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich) to adjust Cys C levels. The culture media and cell lysates were stored at −20°C until the ELISA and BCA assays were performed.

WST-1 colorimetric assay

The WST-1 assay was used to evaluate the effect of DEX, CDDP and 5-FU on KYSE150 cell viability (10). The cells were seeded in 96-well plates and pre-cultured for 24 h. The medium was exchanged with one containing each drug at various concentrations. Cells were then incubated for 72 h at 37°C. The culture medium was replaced with a medium containing a WST-1 reagent, and 3 h later the absorbance in the well was determined at 450 nm with a reference wavelength of 630 nm using a microplate reader (SpectraFluor™; Tecan, Maennedorf, Switzerland).

Statistical analysis

The data for Cys C protein release in samples treated with the indicated drugs were expressed as a percentage of the data obtained from the control. Data are presented as the means ± standard error (SE) of the results of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using the Tukey-Kramer test. P<0.05 (two-tailed) was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Effect of DEX on Cys C release into culture medium

Fig. 1 shows the Cys C protein release from the KYSE150, A549 and Caki-2 cell lines treated with DEX. In the cell lines treated with DEX alone, there was a time-dependent increase in Cys C release into the medium (Fig. 1). Cys C release from KYSE150 cells treated with DEX for 24 h was significantly higher compared to the control cells (50.3±2.5 and 27.8±1.4 ng/ml/mg protein, respectively), and a statistically significant difference between DEX-treated and untreated control cells was observed up to 72 h after treatment (Fig. 1A). Similar findings were also observed in A549 cells (Fig. 1B). However, Cys C release from Caki-2 cells following treatment with DEX for 24 h was significantly different from the control group, whereas this difference was not observed for the 48- and 72-h treatment groups (Fig. 1C).

Effects of concurrent drug treatment on DEX-induced Cys C release

Cys C release from KYSE150 cells following treatment with CDDP, 5-FU and RU-486 alone or in combination with DEX was detected (Fig. 2). The cells treated with 100 nM DEX for 72 h demonstrated a 2.1-fold increase in Cys C release compared to the control. DEX significantly enhanced Cys C release up to 1.9- and 2.0-fold in the presence of 10 μM CDDP and 2 μM 5-FU, respectively, whereas no such effect was observed in the presence of RU-486 (1 μM). Treatment with 5-FU alone significantly decreased Cys C release (66.5±4.0%) compared to the control, although CDDP and RU-486 had no significant inductive or suppressive effects when administered alone.

Cell viability analysis

The cytotoxic effect of DEX, CDDP and 5-FU in KYSE150 cells was examined using the WST-1 assay. No cytotoxicity was observed (Fig. 3A) following incubation of KYSE150 cells with DEX at the concentration used in the present experiments (100 nM) for 72 h. KYSE150 cells were also exposed to CDDP or 5-FU (Fig. 3B and C). Each drug reduced cell viability in a concentration-dependent manner, and the number of viable cells at 2 μM 5-FU and 10 μM CDDP was ∼60% of the control cells.

Discussion

Treatment with DEX induced Cys C release into the culture medium in the cell lines used in this study (Fig. 1), a fact suggesting that DEX treatment partly contributes to the elevation in serum Cys C concentration observed during chemotherapy in esophageal cancer patients (7). Co-treatment of DEX with CDDP or 5-FU demonstrated higher extracellular secretion of Cys C, compared to the values observed in the cells treated with the anticancer drug alone, while a synergistic effect between the drugs was not observed (Fig. 2). Regarding the effect of DEX on Cys C production, Bjarnadóttir et al(11) reported that Cys C expression and secretion from HeLa cells into tissue culture medium increased following treatment with dexamethasone and suggested an association with the Cys C promoter in transcription of the Cys C gene (11). In this study, we examined the effect of RU-486, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, on the enhanced Cys C release from KYSE150 cells induced by DEX. The results showed that RU-486 almost completely suppressed Cys C release from the cells treated with DEX, probably due to the inhibition of the transcriptional regulation mediated by steroid receptors (Fig. 2). Additionally, CDDP and 5-FU induced apoptosis, whereas the inhibition of apoptosis by DEX promoted proliferation in various established and primary cancer cells (12). The enhanced secretion of Cys C induced by co-treatment with DEX might be correlated with the inhibition of apoptosis as well as the abovementioned transcriptional regulation. Corticosteroids are widely used in cancer as well as immunotherapy, while the potential to underestimate normal renal function during these therapies is of marked importance.

Notably, the secretion of Cys C was significantly decreased following 5-FU treatment alone compared to the control, whereas no such effect was observed in CDDP treatment alone (Fig. 2). The difference in Cys C secretion is potentially due to a difference in cytotoxicity between CDDP and 5-FU. When assessing the cytotoxic effects of CDDP and 5-FU in KYSE150 cells using the WST-1 assay, treatment with either drug at the concentrations used in the present study reduced cell viability by ∼60% of their respective control values (Fig. 3B and C). The decreased cell viability was not specific to the 5-FU treatment. However, the correlation between cytotoxicity and reduced Cys C secretion was not fully elucidated.

According to the available literature, the Cys C housekeeping gene is constantly expressed by most nucleated cell types (13), while extracellular cystatins are broadly distributed and detected in most body fluids (14). Cys C is a cysteine protease inhibitor that targets cathepsins (15). Exposure to 5-FU has been reported to result in cleavage of cathepsin B and caspases in human colon carcinoma cell lines, while cathepsin B activation has been reported to contribute to 5-FU-induced apoptosis (16). Additionally, autophagy is believed to be crucially involved in the suppression of tumorigenesis (17), with 5-FU activating autophagic survival as well as apoptotic cell death (16). Although Cys C has been demonstrated to affect basal autophagy in neuronal cells under normal culture conditions and its deficiency suppresses autophagy (18), the reduced secretion of Cys C by 5-FU treatment observed in the present study may contribute to the acceleration of apoptotic cell death. Furthermore, necrosis is a key pathway in non-apoptotic cell death (17). The balance of apoptotic and non-apoptotic cell death varies among types of esophageal and colorectal cancer cell lines (16,19). Additionally, when treated with CDDP and 5-FU, certain cell lines show predominantly apoptotic cell death morphology, while others exhibit predominantly non-apoptotic morphology (19). Although it remains unclear to what extent apoptotic and non-apoptotic cell death were induced in the cells used in the present study, the extent of cytotoxicity might be correlated with the difference in the extracellular secretion of Cys C between treatments and cell types. Flow cytometry is required to address these issues in the future.

Circadian variations in physiological and behavioral processes are affected by several endogenous and exogenous factors. DEX has been reported to induce transient changes in the phase of circadian gene expression in peripheral tissues (20), while 5-FU has been demonstrated to have the ability to inhibit oscillation in the expression of clock genes (21). However, to what extent DEX-induced circadian gene expression affects extracellular Cys C secretion in esophageal cancer patients remains unclear. Moreover, is it not clear to what degree the in vitro reduction in Cys C secretion induced by treatment with 5-FU contributes to changes in systemic Cys C concentration. Further investigation concerning the effects of DEX and 5-FU on the cycle of extracellular Cys C secretion is required to clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying the transient elevation of serum Cys C concentrations observed in our previous clinical study.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) and a Grant-in-Aid for Encouragement of Scientists from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References

1. 

Filler G, Bökenkamp A, Hofmann W, Le Bricon T, Martinez-Brü C and Grubb A: Cystatin C as a marker of GFR - history, indications, and future research. Clin Biochem. 38:1–8. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2. 

Newman DJ: Cystatin C. Ann Clin Biochem. 39:89–104. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

3. 

Chew JS, Saleem M, Florkowski CM and George PM: Cystatin C - a paradigm of evidence based laboratory medicine. Clin Biochem Rev. 29:47–62. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

4. 

Ando N, Iizuka T, Ide H, et al: Surgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study-JCOG9204. J Clin Oncol. 21:4592–4596. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5. 

Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al: A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 19:68–74. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

6. 

American Society of Clinical Oncology; Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. J Clin Oncol. 24:2932–2947. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7. 

Kume M, Yasui H, Yoshikawa Y, et al: Transient elevation of serum cystatin C concentrations during perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy in esophageal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 69:1537–1544. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

8. 

Miki I, Tamura T, Nakamura T, et al: Circadian variability of pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and CLOCK T3111C genetic polymorphism in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ther Drug Monit. 27:369–374. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9. 

Nakade S, Ohno T, Kitagawa J, et al: Population pharmacokinetics of aprepitant and dexamethasone in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 63:75–83. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10. 

Takara K, Fujita M, Minegaki T, et al: Treatment schedule-dependent effect of 5-fluorouracil and platinum derivatives in colorectal cancer cells. Eur J Pharm Sci. 45:272–281. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11. 

Bjarnadóttir M, Grubb A and Olafsson I: Promoter-mediated, dexamethasone-induced increase in cystatin C production by HeLa cells. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 55:617–623. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

12. 

Zhang C, Beckermann B, Kallifatidis G, et al: Corticosteroids induce chemotherapy resistance in the majority of tumour cells from bone, brain, breast, cervix, melanoma and neuroblastoma. Int J Oncol. 29:1295–1301. 2006.

13. 

Abrahamson M, Olafsson I, Palsdottir A, et al: Structure and expression of the human cystatin C gene. Biochem J. 268:287–294. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

14. 

Abrahamson M, Barrett AJ, Salvesen G and Grubb A: Isolation of six cysteine proteinase inhibitors from human urine. Their physicochemical and enzyme kinetic properties and concentrations in biological fluids. J Biol Chem. 261:11282–11289. 1986.

15. 

Grzonka Z, Jankowska E, Kasprzykowski F, et al: Structural studies of cysteine proteases and their inhibitors. Acta Biochim Pol. 48:1–20. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

16. 

Bijnsdorp IV, Peters GJ, Temmink OH, Fukushima M and Kruyt FA: Differential activation of cell death and autophagy results in an increased cytotoxic potential for trifluorothymidine compared to 5-fluorouracil in colon cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 126:2457–2468. 2010.

17. 

Mathew R, Karantza-Wadsworth V and White E: Role of autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 7:961–967. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

18. 

Tizon B, Sahoo S, Yu H, et al: Induction of autophagy by cystatin C: a mechanism that protects murine primary cortical neurons and neuronal cell lines. PLoS One. 5:e98192010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19. 

O’Donovan TR, O’Sullivan GC and McKenna SL: Induction of autophagy by drug-resistant esophageal cancer cells promotes their survival and recovery following treatment with chemotherapeutics. Autophagy. 7:509–524. 2011.

20. 

Balsalobre A, Brown SA, Marcacci L, et al: Resetting of circadian time in peripheral tissues by glucocorticoid signaling. Science. 289:2344–2347. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21. 

Terazono H, Hamdan A, Matsunaga N, et al: Modulatory effects of 5-fluorouracil on the rhythmic expression of circadian clock genes: a possible mechanism of chemotherapy-induced circadian rhythm disturbances. Biochem Pharmacol. 75:1616–1622. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-February 2013
Volume 1 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Qi Z, Li Y, Hu J, Guo H, Zhao X, Wang G, Gao J and Hu Q: The DG75 B-cell lymphoma line exhibits biclonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangement. Biomed Rep 1: 115-118, 2013.
APA
Qi, Z., Li, Y., Hu, J., Guo, H., Zhao, X., Wang, G. ... Hu, Q. (2013). The DG75 B-cell lymphoma line exhibits biclonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangement. Biomedical Reports, 1, 115-118. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2012.22
MLA
Qi, Z., Li, Y., Hu, J., Guo, H., Zhao, X., Wang, G., Gao, J., Hu, Q."The DG75 B-cell lymphoma line exhibits biclonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangement". Biomedical Reports 1.1 (2013): 115-118.
Chicago
Qi, Z., Li, Y., Hu, J., Guo, H., Zhao, X., Wang, G., Gao, J., Hu, Q."The DG75 B-cell lymphoma line exhibits biclonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangement". Biomedical Reports 1, no. 1 (2013): 115-118. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2012.22